Utilization Of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers Research Articles

The Utilization, Expenditure, and Price of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers in the US Medicaid Programs: Trends Over a 31 Year Period

BackgroundAngiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are used for several indications including hypertension. Our aim is to evaluate the utilization, expenditure, and drug price of ACEIs and ARBs in the US Medicaid population. MethodsA retrospective descriptive trend analysis was conducted using Medicaid State Drug Utilization outpatient pharmacy summary files managed by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services from 1991 to 2021. Study drugs included ACEIs (e.g., captopril) and ARBs (e.g., losartan). Annual reimbursement and utilization were calculated for both classes. The average reimbursement per prescription was calculated as a proxy for drug prices. Market share competition between ACEIs and ARBs was analyzed over time. ResultsACEI and ARB utilization rose by 25% from 1991 to 2021. Brand ACEIs utilization peaked in 2002 with 28 million prescriptions while brand ARBs utilization continued to increase until 2005 with over 23 million prescriptions. However, generic products took the lead and exceeded brand ACEI and ARB utilization in 2006 and 2012 respectively. Medicaid spent over $ 33.7 billion on ACEIs and ARBs over 31-year. Brand ACEIs and ARBs average prices increased sharply to $8,104 and $6,908 respectively in 2021. The total prescription market share for ACEIs was 68% compared to 32% of ARBs over the entire study. ConclusionACEIs and ARBs utilization increased over the last 31 years. Brand utilization switched over to generic resulting in less reimbursement. The average prices of brand ACEIs and ARBs continue to increase even after generics were introduced to the market.

PCV59 - Utilization of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers In Ministry Of Health Institutions, Malaysia

Ministry of Health Medicines Formulary (MOHMF) is a list of approved drugs to be used in the Ministry of Health Malaysia institutions. As more drugs are listed into the formulary each year, the MOHMF Review Panel has requested to relook at the Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARBs) used in the MOH Institutions (hospitals and health clinics). The objective of this study is to review the adoption and utilization of ARBs in the MOH institutions. As of September 2016, four types of ARBs with 25 different strengths of single and combination tablets available were listed in the MOHMF. Based on the ARBs listed, a cross-sectional study on usage of ARBs was conducted among the Asia countries namely Thailand, India, Singapore, Indonesia and South Korea. In addition, a survey was sent to MOH institutions (hospitals and health clinics) in September 2016 to March 2017 to obtain a feedback on the availability of ARBs in their local setting. The utilisation estimates were calculated using data for public sector, extracted from the IMS Health (Malaysia) database from 2012 until 2016. The defined daily dose (DDD) per 1000 inhabitants per day was calculated. On average, both hospitals and health clinics kept 11 different strengths of ARBs in the local formulary. Single agents ARBs are most commonly used in the MOH facilities. Up to 2015, the most commonly used ARB was telmisartan, followed by irbesartan, losartan and valsartan. From 2016 onwards, losartan become the most used ARB single agent. Similarly, the cross-sectional survey showed losartan was most commonly used among the Asia countries. However, Malaysia reimbursed the most ARBs while most countries choose to reimburse between two and three ARBs. The result of this study can help to formulate the investment and disinvestment policy on ARBs in the MOH Medicines Formulary.

Assessment of the utilization of angiotensin receptor blockers in hypertension

To assess the degree in which the utilization of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in our Healthcare Area fits the criteria proposed by the Autonomous Community of Madrid (CAM) before setting «Plan de Actuación de ARA-II» («Action Plan ARA-II»). To study the indications for which are prescribed and to identify those factors that can show influence in prescription. Drug utilization study of the type indication-prescription, descriptive and transversal, for which ARBs-treated and hypertensive patients admitted to a University General Hospital for a study period of 3 months were selected. Based on the clinical situations summarized in the CAM Document «Criterios para establecer el lugar en la terapéutica de los antagonistas de los receptores de la angiotensina II» («Criteria for the place of angiotensin receptor blockers in the therapeutic»), a percentage of patients with «appropriate prescription» and «inadequate prescription« of ARBs was calculated and analyzed in order to determine if the age and the sex were related to the type of prescription or the main indications for which they had been prescribed. Out of the 153 patients included in the study, 67.3% had a «inadequate prescription«, 47.6% of them due to an ARBs prescription as the first drug inhibitor of the reninangiotensin- aldosterone system and 34.0% owing to a poor control of blood pressure with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi). There were no statistically significant differences found either by age or sex in the type of prescription or in the main indications for which they were prescribed. The adequacy of the criteria for the utilisation of ARBs Document occurred in 32.7% of cases. In addition, factors such as age and sex did not seem to affect the type of prescription. Misconceptions of superiority of ARBs versus ACEi were evidenced as well.

Influence of lifting prescribing restrictions for losartan on subsequent sartan utilization patterns in Austria: implications for other countries

Introduction: Prescribing restrictions for angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) limited their utilization in Austria. Recently, generic losartan became available with its prescribing restrictions lifted while still in place for patented ARBs. Objectives: The main aim of this study is to assess the impact of the lifting of the prescribing restriction on utilization of losartan in ambulatory care versus other single ARBs, expenditure per defined daily dose (DDD) of losartan as well as total ARB expenditure and utilization of ARB combinations. Finally, to suggest potential measures that could be introduced to further enhance ARB-prescribing efficiency. Methodology: A quasi-experimental study of the utilization of different ARBs alone or in fixed dose combinations using a segmented time series. Utilization measured in DDDs, defined as ‘the average maintenance dose of a drug when used in its major indication in adults’. Costs measured as total expenditure for different ARBs as well as their expenditure/DDD. Results: Losartan utilization increased significantly following the withdrawal of prescribing restrictions (p > 0.001). Utilization of single-sourced ARBs also increased , but the growth rate was appreciably reduced once restrictions were lifted for losartan (p > 0.01). As a result, total expenditure of single ARBs increased but at an appreciably lower rate than utilization, helped by total expenditure/DDD for losartan declining by 78% over the study period. There was continuing appreciable utilization of fixed-dose combinations. Conclusion: Lifting of prescribing restrictions for losartan significantly enhanced its utilization, increasing ARB-prescribing efficiency, providing direction to other European authorities. Additional reforms are being considered to further switch utilization away from single-sourced ARBs to additionally improve prescribing efficiency as more multiple sourced ARBs become available.

Possible ways to enhance renin–angiotensin prescribing efficiency: Republic of Serbia as a case history?

Multiple reforms have been instigated across Europe to enhance prescribing efficiency. Supply-side reforms in the Republic of Serbia include measures to lower the price of generics and originators, with demand-side measures including patient copayments and prescribing restrictions. Specific measures for renin-angiotensin inhibitor drugs include a 50% copayment for angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) versus approximately 50 cents per prescription for established angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), as there is no perceived difference in effectiveness between the two classes. To assess the influence of these measures on ARB utilization, as well as reimbursed prices of ACEIs and ARBs over time. Observational retrospective case study of all ambulatory care patients in the Republic of Serbia's Health Insurance Fund database who were dispensed at least one ACEI or ARB alone or in combination (fixed dose combination [FDC]) between 2005 and 2011. Utilization measured in defined daily doses (DDDs) and only reimbursed expenditure (overall and expenditure/DDD) as Health Insurance perspective. There was a 1.8-fold increase in renin-angiotensin inhibitor drug utilization, rising to 207.4 DDDs/1000 inhabitants per day in 2011. This is driven principally by a 19.6-fold increase in ACEI FDCs. There was only limited utilization of ARBs at just 2% of total renin-angiotensin inhibitor drugs in 2011. Reimbursed expenditure increased 2.54-fold due to an appreciable increase in ACEI FDC utilization at approximately twice the cost of ACEIs in recent years. Alongside this, we noted considerable differences in expenditure/DDD for different ACEIs. CONCLUSION & FUTURE PERSPECTIVE: High patient copayments for ARBs appreciably limited their utilization in Serbia, which mirrors the findings from other studies. Potential future measures to enhance prescribing efficiency include reference pricing for ACEIs based on the lowest price of an established ACEI. In addition, reference pricing for FDCs should be based on the reference price of the individual components combined. This builds on recent reforms restricting the reimbursement of FDCs until 3 months after individual components have been prescribed separately.

Ongoing initiatives in the Republic of Srpska to enhance prescribing efficiency: influence and future directions

Background: Multiple reforms have been introduced in the Republic of Srpska to enhance prescribing efficiency. Objectives: First, assess their influence on utilization and expenditure on proton-pump inhibitors, statins and renin–angiotensin inhibitor drugs. Second, assess whether the Republic can obtain low prices for generics. Third, suggest additional reforms that could be introduced. Methods: Observational study of all ambulatory care patients between 2003 and 2010. Defined daily doses (DDDs) and DDDs per 1000 inhabitants per day used for measuring changes in utilization. Reimbursed expenditure used as health insurance perspective. Results: Increasing utilization in all three classes. Utilization of angiotensin-receptor blockers principally limited by prescribing restrictions. Reimbursed expenditure/DDD in all three classes decreased by up to 82% in 2010 versus 2004, appreciably improving prescribing efficiency for the statins. Increased utilization of esomeprazole at higher reimbursed expenditure/DDD, and similarly angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitor combinations at higher expenditure versus single drugs, limited the ability to fully capitalise on these reductions. Conclusion: Multiple measures helped lower expenditure/ DDD, providing hope to countries with small populations. Additional measures are planned to further improve prescribing efficiency in the Republic of Srpska.

Influence of demand-side measures to enhance renin–angiotensin prescribing efficiency in Europe: implications for the future

European countries strive to enhance prescribing efficiency. This includes renin–angiotensin drugs following the availability of generic angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs). Aims: To compare angiotensin receptor blocker utilization and expenditure patterns in Austria and Croatia following prescribing restrictions, as well as with other European countries introducing different supply- and demand-side measures. Lastly, to appraise the impact of generic losartan in Croatia on utilization of patented angiotensin receptor blockers. Method: Observational retrospective study principally between 2001 and 2007, using defined daily doses and €/1000 inhabitants/year. Demand-side measures were based on the four ‘E’s – education, engineering, economics and enforcement. Results: Greater intensity of follow-up of prescribing restrictions in Croatia enhanced utilization of ACEIs versus Austria. There was high utilization of ACEIs in Scotland following intensive demand-side measures, similar to Austria and Croatia. Demand-side measures in Spain (Catalonia) and Sweden also appeared to moderate angiotensin receptor blockers utilization. The combination of measures helped stabilize expenditure on renin–angiotensin drugs when adjusted for population sizes despite appreciable increases in volumes. The only exception was Portugal, with less intensive measures. Conclusion: Multiple and intensive demand-side measures enhanced prescribing efficiency. The more intense follow-up of ARB prescribing restrictions in Croatia had a greater influence on subsequent utilization patterns than Austria. Both findings confirm earlier studies. Reforms also favorably enhanced the prescribing of generic losartan once available.

ACE Inhibitor and ARB utilization and expenditures in the Medicaid fee-for-service program from 1991 to 2008.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are widely prescribed for the treatment of hypertension and heart failure, as well as for kidney disease prevention in patients with diabetes mellitus and the management of patients after myocardial infarction. To (a) describe ACE inhibitor and ARB utilization and spending in the Medicaid fee-for-service program from 1991 through 2008, and (b) estimate the potential cost savings for the collective Medicaid programs from a higher ratio of generic ACE inhibitor utilization. A retrospective, descriptive analysis was performed using the National Summary Files from the Medicaid State Drug Utilization Data, which are composed of pharmacy claims that are subject to federally mandated rebates from pharmaceutical manufacturers. For the years 1991-2008, quarterly claim counts and expenditures were calculated by summing data for individual ACE inhibitors and ARBs. Quarterly per-claim expenditure as a proxy for drug price was computed for all brand and generic drugs. Market shares were calculated based on the number of pharmacy claims and Medicaid expenditures. In the Medicaid fee-for-service program, ACE inhibitors accounted for 100% of the claims in the combined market for ACE inhibitors and ARBs in 1991, 80.6% in 2000, and 64.7% in 2008. The Medicaid expenditure per ACE inhibitor claim dropped from $37.24 in 1991 to $24.03 in 2008 when generics accounted for 92.5% of ACE inhibitor claims; after adjusting for inflation for the period from 1991 to 2008, the real price drop was 59.2%. Brand ACE inhibitors accounted for only 7.5% of the claims in 2008 for all ACE inhibitors but 32.1% of spending; excluding the effects of manufacturer rebates, Medicaid spending would have been reduced by $28.7 million (9%) in 2008 if all ACE inhibitor claims were generic. The average price per ACE inhibitor claim in 2008 was $24.03 ($17.64 per generic claim vs. $103.45 per brand claim) versus $81.98 per ARB claim. If the ACE inhibitor ratio had been 75% in 2008 rather than 64.7%, the Medicaid program would have saved approximately 13% or about $41.8 million, again excluding the effects of manufacturer rebates. If the ACE inhibitor ratio had been 90% in 2008, the cost savings for the combined Medicaid fee-forservice programs would have been about 33% or about $102.3 million. The total cost savings opportunity with 100% generic ACE inhibitor utilization in 2008 and an ACE inhibitor ratio of 75% was $75.1 million (24%) or $142.3M (46%) with a 90% ACE inhibitor ratio. Factors that affect Medicaid spending by contributing to increased utilization of ACE inhibitors and ARBs, such as the rising prevalence of hypertension, heart disease, and diabetes, can be offset by reduction in the average price attained through a higher proportion of ACE inhibitors and a higher percentage of generic versus brand ACE inhibitors.

Initiatives to enhance renin–angiotensin prescribing efficiency in Austria: impact and implications for other countries

Aim: To assess the utilization of renin–angiotensin drugs, including combinations, in Austria in practice given the limited availability of diuretics, as well as the impact of recent reforms and initiatives on the utilization and expenditure of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), following prescribing restrictions on ARBs immediately after their introduction. Methods: Utilization of dispensed prescriptions in ambulatory care was captured from 2001 to 2007 using defined daily doses as well as defined daily doses/1000 inhabitants/day for patients covered by the social health-insurance system. The data were provided by the internal data warehouse of Hauptverband der Österreichischen Sozialversicherungsträger. Total costs in Euros were used for the analysis to facilitate comparisons with earlier studies. Results: There was appreciable utilization of fixed-dose diuretic combinations at between 36 and 38% of all renin–angiotensin products, in line with expectations. The reduction in expenditure/defined daily dose for originator and generic ACEis and their combinations is, again, in line with expectations, mirroring earlier findings for proton pump inhibitors and statins. ARB utilization was just under 27% of all renin–angiotensin products. This is higher than the low utilization rates seen with atorvastatin following its prescribing restrictions, and may reflect the difficulties if restrictions are based on subjective criteria. ARB utilization rates were lower or similar to other countries, who have implemented a different range of demand-side reforms to limit their prescribing with the advent of generic ACEis. Conclusion: The results confirm the successful implementation of the latest pricing policies and demand-side measures for generics and originators in Austria. We believe the prescribing restrictions for ARBs reduced their utilization in practice and offer an alternative approach to other demand-side measures.

Angiotensin receptor blockers on the formularies of Medicare drug plans.

The presence of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) on the formularies of Medicare Part D prescription drug plans (PDPs) is vitally important to the health of seniors who cannot tolerate angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. To determine whether ARBs are present on the formularies of PDPs and how the prescription cost-sharing for ARBs under Part D compares to cost-sharing before Part D. Cross-sectional analyses of March 2006 Medicare Part D formularies (n = 1,446) and of ARB utilization and cost-sharing for adults over the age of 64 included in the nationally representative Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. (1) Presence of ARBs on Part D formularies. (2) Average out-of-pocket costs for 30-day supply of ARBs before and after Part D (both in 2006 dollars). All PDP formularies included at least 1 ARB. Most plans covered 2 ARBs (41%) and 35% covered all 7. The average monthly copay for the most commonly used ARB, valsartan, is $28 under part D, $14 before Part D for individuals with prescription coverage, and $53 before Part D for individuals without coverage. Whereas ARBs are present on all Part D formularies, many seniors will pay more for these drugs under Part D. Any savings in copayments under Part D may be erased by the monthly premium and by more expensive cost-sharing when seniors reach the 'donut hole'.