Angiotensin Receptor Blockers Users Research Articles

Angiotensin Receptor Blockers, But Not Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, Improve Bone Mineral Density: Results From The TUDA study

Abstract Background Both hypertension and osteoporosis are common in older adults and frequently co-exist. The renin angiotensin system has been implicated in osteoclast activation and bone loss. Several studies have previously examined the relationship between various inhibitors of RAS and bone mineral density (BMD). In this study we examined the relationship between angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and angiotensin converting enzyme ACE inhibitors and BMD. Methods Study participants were from a cross-sectional study of adults aged >60 years; Trinity Ulster University Department of Agriculture (TUDA) study. We excluded participants on treatments for osteoporosis. In users and non-users of ARBs and ACE inhibitors, we compared least squares means BMD measured by densitometry at the neck of femur, hip, and lumbar spine adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, timed up and go, vitamin D, parathyroid hormone, eGFR, diabetes mellitus, smoking, alcohol consumption, dairy intake, glucocorticoid exposure, thiazide, and loop diuretic use. Results There were 2218 participants (mean age 70.1±6.5 years, 58.3% female, 23.4% (n=519) on ARBs and 30.9% (n=686) on ACE inhibitors). In both univariate and multivariate analysis, ARB users had higher BMD than non-users were associated with higher BMD at the neck of femur (0.860 g/cm² vs. 0.846 g/cm², p=0.016); at the total hip, (0.938 g/cm² vs. 0.919 g/cm², p=0.004); at the lumbar spine, BMD was 1.106 g/cm² vs. 1.074 g/cm² p< 0.001). No significant relationship between ACE inhibitors and BMD at any site was observed after multivariate adjustment. Conclusion ARBs were associated with improved BMD while ACE inhibitors were not. Similar results have been found in other studies but the mechanisms but there is substantial uncertainty regarding the mechanisms underlying these relationships. These findings could be important in the choice of antihypertensive agent in older patients at risk of fracture and further research is warranted.

Angiotensin Receptor Blockers for Hypertension and Risk of Epilepsy

Animal and human studies have suggested that the use of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may be associated with a lower risk of incident epilepsy compared with other antihypertensive medications. However, observational data from the US are lacking. To evaluate the association between ARB use and epilepsy incidence in subgroups of US patients with hypertension. This retrospective cohort study used data from a national health administrative database from January 2010 to December 2017 with propensity score (PS) matching. The eligible cohort included privately insured individuals aged 18 years or older with diagnosis of primary hypertension and dispensed at least 1 ARB, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), β-blocker, or calcium channel blocker (CCB) from 2010 to 2017. Patients with a diagnosis of epilepsy at or before the index date or dispensed an antiseizure medication 12 months before or 90 days after initiating the study medications were excluded. The data analysis for this project was conducted from April 2022 to April 2024. Propensity scores were generated based on baseline covariates and used to match patients who received ARBs with those who received either ACEIs, β-blockers, CCBs, or a combination of these antihypertensive medications. Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate epilepsy incidence during follow-up comparing the ARB cohort with other antihypertensive classes. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine the association between ARB use and epilepsy incidence in various subgroups. Of 2 261 964 patients (mean [SD] age, 61.7 [13.9] years; 1 120 630 [49.5%] female) included, 309 978 received ARBs, 807 510 received ACEIs, 695 887 received β-blockers, and 448 589 received CCBs. Demographic and clinical characteristics differed across the 4 comparison groups prior to PS matching. Compared with ARB users, patients receiving ACEIs were predominantly male and had diabetes, CCB users were generally older (eg, >65 years), and β-blocker users had more comorbidities and concurrent medications. The 1:1 PS-matched subgroups included 619 858 patients for ARB vs ACEI, 619 828 patients for ARB vs β-blocker, and 601 002 patients for ARB vs CCB. Baseline characteristics were equally distributed between comparison groups after matching with propensity scores. Use of ARBs was associated with a decreased incidence of epilepsy compared with ACEIs (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.58-0.96), β-blockers (aHR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.54-0.90), and a combination of other antihypertensive classes (aHR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.56-0.95). Subgroup analyses revealed a significant association between ARB use (primarily losartan) and epilepsy incidence in patients with no preexisting history of stroke or cardiovascular disease. This cohort study found that ARBs, mainly losartan, were associated with a lower incidence of epilepsy compared with other antihypertensive agents in hypertensive patients with no preexisting stroke or cardiovascular disease. Further studies, such as randomized clinical trials, are warranted to confirm the comparative antiepileptogenic properties of antihypertensive medications.

Angiotensin Receptor Blockers and the Risk of Suspected Drug-Induced Liver Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using Electronic Health Record-Based Common Data Model in South Korea.

Angiotensin receptor blockers are widely used antihypertensive drugs in South Korea. In 2021, the Korea Ministry of Food and Drug Safety acknowledged the need for national compensation for a drug-induced liver injury (DILI) after azilsartan use. However, little is known regarding the association between angiotensin receptor blockers and DILI. We conducted a retrospective cohort study in incident users of angiotensin receptor blockers from a common data model database (1 January, 2017-31 December, 2021) to compare the risk of DILI among specific angiotensin receptor blockers against valsartan. Patients were assigned to treatment groups at cohort entry based on prescribed angiotensin receptor blockers. Drug-induced liver injury was operationally defined using the International DILI Expert Working Group criteria. Cox regression analyses were conducted to derive hazard ratios and the inverse probability of treatment weighting method was applied. All analyses were performed using R. In total, 229,881 angiotensin receptor blocker users from 20 university hospitals were included. Crude DILI incidence ranged from 15.6 to 82.8 per 1000 person-years in treatment groups, most were cholestatic and of mild severity. Overall, the risk of DILI was significantly lower in olmesartan users than in valsartan users (hazard ratio: 0.73 [95% confidence interval 0.55-0.96]). In monotherapy patients, the risk was significantly higher in azilsartan users than in valsartan users (hazard ratio: 6.55 [95% confidence interval 5.28-8.12]). We found a significantly higher risk of suspected DILI in patients receiving azilsartan monotherapy compared with valsartan monotherapy. Our findings emphasize the utility of real-world evidence in advancing our understanding of adverse drug reactions in clinical practice.

Evaluation of antihypertensive medications use and survival in patients with ovarian cancer: a population-based retrospective cohort study

BackgroundDespite declining mortality in most countries and in Lithuania, ovarian cancer burden has remained high. Studies have indicated that antihypertensive medications use may help to improve ovarian cancer survival, however findings remain controversial. The aim of the study was to analyse the association between post-diagnosis antihypertensive medications intake and cancer-specific survival in ovarian cancer patients.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included 588 ovarian cancer cases diagnosed between 2013 and 2015. Hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models to assess associations between antihypertensive medications and ovarian cancer-specific mortality.ResultsIn total, 279 (47%) patients died during the follow-up; 242 (87%) of them died due to ovarian cancer. The risk of ovarian cancer death was reduced in angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE inhibitors) users vs. non-users (HR 0.55, 95% CI: 0.36–0.83). Subgroup analysis showed better ovarian cancer survival in higher dose ACE inhibitors users (HR 0.46, 95% CI: 0.28–0.77, p for trend 0.002); the effect was also stronger in age 51–65 years, stage I–III, surgery or chemotherapy treatment, pre-diagnosis ACE inhibitor users’ and pre-diagnosis hypertension subgroups. The risk of cancer-specific death was slightly lower among calcium-channel blocker and angiotensin-receptor blocker users and higher among beta-blocker users as compared to non-users, however chance and confounding could not be ruled out. We found no association between the use of centrally and peripherally acting antiadrenergic agents and diuretics and risk of ovarian cancer-specific mortality.ConclusionsOur findings imply that post-diagnosis use of ACE inhibitors may be associated with reduced ovarian cancer-specific mortality; however, further research is needed for the comprehensive assessment.

Abstract TMP98: Pre-Stroke Use of Blood-Brain Barrier Crossing Angiotensin Receptor Blockers in Elderly Patients Mitigates Neurological Severity at the Onset of Acute Stroke

Introduction: Functional outcomes after acute stroke (AS) are related to the initial neurological severity. Therefore, using neuroprotective agents to prevent or reduce brain damage shows promise as a preventive approach. Blood-brain barrier crossing (BBBc) angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) have been reported to reduce the risk of cognitive disorders. Therefore, BBBc ARBs may exert neuroprotective effects on brain damage caused by AS. However, the association between pre-stroke BBBc ARB use and neurological severity at the onset of AS has not been well studied. Hypothesis: Pre-stroke BBBc ARBs in elderly patients is linked to mild neurological severity (MNS) at the time of AS onset. Methods: We retrospectively included patients admitted within 24 hours of AS onset between January 2013 and March 2019 with available pre-stroke medication information. We defined MNS as a score of ≤5 points on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. We conducted logistic regression analysis using variables for pre-stroke BBBc ARBs initiation, calculated propensity scores for pre-stroke BBBc ARBs use, and implemented one-to-one propensity score matching (PSM). The McNemar test assessed whether pre-stroke BBBc ARBs administration significantly affected MNS. Results: Out of 4294 patients with AS, 3472 met the inclusion criteria. Following one-to-one PSM, we identified 508 patients each in the BBBc ARBs usage and non-usage groups. The median ages of BBBc ARBs users and non-users were 80 and 81 years, respectively. Among the 508 BBBc ARBs users and the 508 non-users, 325 and 278 patients exhibited MNS, respectively (p=0.0027). Furthermore, the McNemar test revealed an asymmetrical binary matched pairs contingency table of MNS (p=0.0021), indicating a significant association between pre-stroke BBBc ARB use and MNS at the time of AS onset. Conclusions: The pre-stroke utilization of BBBc ARBs among elderly patients is associated with MNS at the onset of AS, implying potential neuroprotective effects against AS-induced brain damage. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate our findings and establish the practical application of BBBc ARBs for neuroprotection before AS.

Three-Year Cardiovascular Outcomes of Telmisartan in Patients With Hypertension: An Electronic Health Record-Based Cohort Study.

Telmisartan exhibits superior efficacy in controlling 24-h blood pressure (BP) compared with other angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs). However, data on its cardiovascular effects in patients with hypertension are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the cardiovascular outcomes in patients taking telmisartan compared to those taking other ARBs. This multicenter retrospective study used data from the Korea University Medical Center database, built from electronic health records. A total of 19,247 patients taking two or more antihypertensive medications were identified. Patients prescribed telmisartan (telmisartan users) were compared with those prescribed an ARB other than telmisartan (other ARB users). The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and hospitalizations due to heart failure. The adjusted outcomes were compared using 1:1 propensity score (PS) matching. Overall, 3,437 (17.9%) patients were telmisartan users. These patients were more likely to be younger and male and less likely to have a history of chronic kidney disease, dialysis, or heart failure. In the PS-matched cohort, BP control was similar in both groups; however, telmisartan users exhibited significantly lower visit-to-visit BP variability. The adjusted 3-year MACE rate was similar between telmisartan users (4.6%) and other ARB users (4.7%, log-rank P = 0.75), with comparable safety profiles. In real-world practice, telmisartan showed cardiovascular outcomes similar to those of other ARBs in patients with hypertension taking two or more antihypertensive drugs.

Impact of calcium channel blockers and angiotensin receptor blockers on hematological parameters in type 2 diabetic patients.

Antihypertensive medications have been associated with a reduction in hemoglobin (Hb) levels, leading to clinically significant anemia. We aimed to provide valuable insights into the impact of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) on hematological parameters by measuring the levels of erythropoietin (EPO), ferritin, and complete blood count (CBC) in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), particularly considering the duration of the antihypertensives use. In addition to comparing their effects on blood pressure, glycemic status, and renal function, a retrospective cohort study was conducted at the consultation unit of Alsalam Teaching Hospital, Mosul, Nineveh Province, between October 2022 and February 2023. A total of 160 participants were enrolled after being fully examined by the consultants to detect their eligibility for inclusion in the study and to rule out any abnormality. They consisted of 40 healthy controls, 30 T2DM patients (T2DM group), 30 T2DM patients with newly diagnosed hypertension (HT) (T2DM+HT group), 30 type 2 diabetic-hypertensives on ARBs (T2DM+HT+ARBs group), and 30 type 2 diabetic-hypertensives on CCBs (T2DM+HT+CCBs group). Five milliliters of blood was drawn from a vein and divided into two parts. Two milliliters was transferred into an anticoagulant tube for the measurement of HbA1c and complete blood picture. Serum was obtained from the remaining blood and used for assessment of ferritin, EPO, FSG, creatinine, urea, and uric acid. Significantly reduced FSG and HbA1c levels were observed in T2DM+HT+CCBs and T2DM+HT+ARBs groups vs T2DM+HT group (p < 0.05). The T2DM+HT+CCBs group had statistically higher urea levels than the T2DM group (p < 0.05). Both CCBs and ARBs use resulted in reduced creatinine clearance (CrCl). T2DM+HT+CCBs group exhibited slightly higher uric acid levels compared to controls (p < 0.05). Prolonged use of CCBs and ARBs led to disturbances in hematological parameters, with CCBs users showing the lowest levels of hemoglobin (Hb), RBCs, and hematocrit (Hct) among the groups. ARBs users displayed the lowest values of EPO and ferritin compared to other patient groups, along with reduced levels of Hb, RBCs, and Hct, albeit slightly higher than CCBs users. Our study highlights the importance of a balanced approach in prescribing ARBs and CCBs to patients with T2DM, given their potential to induce blood abnormalities, particularly with prolonged usage.

Factors associated with non-adherence to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in older patients with peripheral arterial disease.

Introduction: As in other chronic conditions, medication adherence is important in the treatment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Our study aimed at a) analysing non-adherence to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in groups of older ACEI and ARB users with PAD, and b) identifying characteristics associated with non-adherence. Methods: We focused on the implementation phase of adherence (i.e., after treatment initiation and before possible discontinuation of treatment). The study cohort included ACEI/ARB users aged ≥65years in whom PAD was newly diagnosed during 2012. Non-adherence was defined as Proportion of Days Covered (PDC) < 80%. Results: Among 7,080 ACEI/ARB users (6,578 ACEI and 502 ARB users), there was no significant difference in the overall proportion of non-adherent patients between ACEI and ARB users (13.9% and 15.3%, respectively). There were differences in factors associated with non-adherence between the groups of persistent and non-persistent (i.e., discontinued treatment at some point during follow-up) ACEI and ARB users. Increasing age, dementia and bronchial asthma were associated with non-adherence in persistent ACEI users. General practitioner as index prescriber was associated with adherence in the groups of non-persistent ACEI users and persistent ARB users. Conclusion: Identified factors associated with non-adherence may help in determining the groups of patients who require increased attention.

Development and Verification of Time-Series Deep Learning for Drug-Induced Liver Injury Detection in Patients Taking Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers: A Multicenter Distributed Research Network Approach.

The objective of this study was to develop and validate a multicenter-based, multi-model, time-series deep learning model for predicting drug-induced liver injury (DILI) in patients taking angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs). The study leveraged a national-level multicenter approach, utilizing electronic health records (EHRs) from six hospitals in Korea. A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using EHRs from six hospitals in Korea, comprising a total of 10,852 patients whose data were converted to the Common Data Model. The study assessed the incidence rate of DILI among patients taking ARBs and compared it to a control group. Temporal patterns of important variables were analyzed using an interpretable timeseries model. The overall incidence rate of DILI among patients taking ARBs was found to be 1.09%. The incidence rates varied for each specific ARB drug and institution, with valsartan having the highest rate (1.24%) and olmesartan having the lowest rate (0.83%). The DILI prediction models showed varying performance, measured by the average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, with telmisartan (0.93), losartan (0.92), and irbesartan (0.90) exhibiting higher classification performance. The aggregated attention scores from the models highlighted the importance of variables such as hematocrit, albumin, prothrombin time, and lymphocytes in predicting DILI. Implementing a multicenter-based timeseries classification model provided evidence that could be valuable to clinicians regarding temporal patterns associated with DILI in ARB users. This information supports informed decisions regarding appropriate drug use and treatment strategies.

A Real-World Analysis of Post-Marketing Surveillance Data Assessing the Incidence of Hyperkalemia or Acute Kidney Injury in Patients on Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors Versus Angiotensin-Receptor Blockers.

The widely used Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor (RASI) may increase the risk of hyperkalemia and acute kidney injury (AKI). We aimed to analyze the RASI-related AKI or hyperkalemia reported in the Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to optimize patients' treatment and provide a reference for a clinically safe and rational prescription. We obtained data in FAERS recorded from January 2004 to December 2020. Disproportionality analysis and Bayesian analysis were used in data mining to screen the suspected AKI or hyperkalemia after RASI. The time to onset, hospitalization, and prognosis of RASI-associated AKI or hyperkalemia were also investigated. We identified 11,301 RASI-related adverse events (AEs) of hyperkalemia and AKI in the FAERS database; 4997 were due to Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), 5658 were due to angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), and 646 were due to the combination of ACEI and ARB. AKI was more commonly reported in patients with ARB (78.42%) than ACEI users (57.27%). Hyperkalemia cases were reported more in ACEI users (28.70%) than ARB users (14.14%). The median time to onset of RAS-associated AKI was 135.0 (17.0-620.0) days. RASI-associated hyperkalemia occurred relatively later in ACEI users, with a median onset time of 261.0 (43.0-1097.7) days, compared with that of 200.5 (52.0-636.0) days in ARB users (p 0.001). Among all AEs, 72.39% of cases received hospitalization. Death occurred in 6.3% of the renal AE cases. The elderly and heart failure were potential risk factors for death in patients who developed RASI-associated renal AEs, with an increased Odds Ratio (OR) compared with younger age (OR = 1.32) and hypertension patients (OR = 2.55). Based on the criteria of the four algorithms, the ACEI and ARB combination further increased the incidence of AKI and hyperkalemia, demonstrating the highest Reporting Odds Ratios (RORs), Proportional Reporting Ratios (PRRs) and Empirical Bayesian Geometric Average (EBGMs). Patients who indicated RASI for heart failure demonstrated a higher death risk when AEs occurred. ACEI combined with ARB can increase the incidence of hyperkalemia and AKI. Careful and individualized management is necessary.

Valsartan, Losartan and Irbesartan use in the USA, UK, Canada and Denmark after the nitrosamine recalls: a descriptive cohort study

ObjectivesTo examine valsartan, losartan and irbesartan usage and switching patterns in the USA, UK, Canada and Denmark before and after July 2018, when the first Angiotensin-Receptor-Blocker (ARB) (valsartan) was recalled.DesignRetrospective...

Comparison of cardiocerebrovascular disease incidence between angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker users in a real-world cohort.

Both angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are known to be effective in managing cardiovascular diseases, but more evidence supports the use of an ACEI. This study investigated the difference in cardiovascular disease incidence between relatively low-compliance ACEIs and high-compliance ARBs in the clinical setting. Patients who were first prescribed ACEIs or ARBs at two tertiary university hospitals in Korea were observed in this retrospective cohort study for the incidence of heart failure, angina, acute myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular disease, ischemic heart disease, and major adverse cardiovascular events for 5 years after the first prescription. Additionally, 5-year Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used based on the presence or absence of statins. Overall, 2,945 and 9,189 patients were prescribed ACEIs and ARBs, respectively. When compared to ACEIs, the incidence of heart failure decreased by 52% in those taking ARBs (HR [95% CI] = 0.48 [0.39-0.60], P < 0.001), and the incidence of cerebrovascular disease increased by 62% (HR [95% CI] = 1.62 [1.26-2.07], P < 0.001). The incidence of ischemic heart disease (P = 0.223) and major adverse cardiovascular events (P = 0.374) did not differ significantly between the two groups. ARBs were not inferior to ACEIs in relation to reducing the incidence of cardiocerebrovascular disease in the clinical setting; however, there were slight differences for each disease. The greatest strength of real-world evidence is that it allows the follow-up of specific drug use, including drug compliance. Large-scale studies on the effects of relatively low-compliance ACEIs and high-compliance ARBs on cardiocerebrovascular disease are warranted in the future.

An updated meta-analysis: The effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in the mortality of hypertensive patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background One of the most common co-morbidities identified among COVID-19 patients was hypertension. Debates on use of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEI) and Angiotensin-Receptor blockers (ARB) emerged due to an interaction of the said drugs with Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), an enzyme which is a point of entry of coronavirus. This study aims to give an update on the work of Zhang et al13 in exploring the association of ACEI/ARB use on mortality and disease severity. Methods This meta-analysis involves review of observational studies among hypertensive COVID-19 patients with composite data on ACEI and ARB use. The literature search included studies published from December 2019 until June 30, 2020. Analyses were performed determining the odds ratio of each event using the raw data obtained from each study. Random effects model and Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel Method were utilized at 95% confidence interval. To check for heterogeneity, X2 test and I2 statistic were calculated. Subgroup analyses on ACEI users and ARB users were also done. Cochrane Review Manager (REVMAN 5.3) was used and Forest plots were generated. In this update, the total population of patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection was more than 50,000 with hypertensive patients comprising more than half of the sample population. The analyses done manifested decreased frequency of both outcomes with ACEI/ARB use. Results The calculated odds ratio for mortality and disease severity were 0.63 and 0.56, respectively. However, a statistically significant heterogeneity existed for both outcomes. Subgroup analyses among ACEI users versus ACEI/ARB non-users (odds ratio for mortality = 0.95, I2 = 0%; and odds ratio for disease severity = 0.30, I2 = 0%), and ARB users versus ACEI/ARB non-users (odds ratio for mortality = 0.70, I2 =f 68%; and odds ratio for disease severity = 0.48, I2 = 77%) also manifested decreased frequency of both outcomes. However, significant heterogeneity exists among the ARB users, which is in contrary among the ACEI users. Conclusion The use of ACEI contributes to a statistically significant reduction of mortality and disease severity among hypertensive patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection. We recommend continuing analysis of association of ACEI and ARB use and clinical outcomes since recent analysis suggests a beneficial effect especially in the ACEI group. At present, our findings are still in line with the current recommendation to not discontinue the use of ACEI and ARB among our hypertensive patients.

Comparative Risk of Angioedema With Sacubitril-Valsartan vs Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone Inhibitors

BackgroundData on angioedema risk among sacubitril-valsartan (SV) users in real-world settings are limited. ObjectivesWe sought to evaluate the risk of angioedema among SV new users compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor and angiotensin-receptor-blocker (ARB) new users separately. MethodsWe conducted a propensity score–matched cohort study, comparing SV new users (no use of SV, ACE inhibitor, ARB 6 months before) and SV new users with prior use (within 183 or 14 days) of ACE inhibitor or ARB (ACE inhibitor–SV and ARB-SV users; recent ACE inhibitor–SV and recent ARB-SV users, respectively) vs ACE inhibitor and ARB new users separately. ResultsCompared with ACE inhibitor, SV new (HR: 0.18; 95% CI: 0.11-0.29) and ACE inhibitor–SV users (HR: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.23-0.43) showed lower risk of angioedema. On the other hand, there was no difference in angioedema risk when SV new users (HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.35-1.01) or ARB-SV users (HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.58-1.26) were compared with ARB new users. Compared with SV new users, ACE inhibitor–SV users (HR: 1.62; 95% CI: 0.91-2.89) trended toward higher angioedema risk, which intensified when the ACE inhibitor to SV switch occurred within 14 days (recent ACE inhibitor–SV) (HR: 1.98; 95% CI: 1.11-3.53). Similarly, ARB-SV users (HR: 2.03; 95% CI: 1.16-3.54) experienced an increased risk compared with SV new users, which intensified for the more recent switchers (recent ARB-SV) (HR: 2.45; 95% CI: 1.36-4.43). ConclusionsWe did not observe an increased risk of angioedema among SV new users compared with ACE inhibitor or ARB users. However, there was an increased risk of angioedema among SV users who recently switched from ACE inhibitor or ARB compared with SV new users.

Renin-angiotensin blocker use is associated with improved cardiovascular mortality in Indian patients with mild-moderate chronic kidney disease-findings from the ICKD study.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) are the antihypertensive drug class of choice in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Head-to-head comparisons of the renal or non-renal outcomes between ACEI/ARB users and nonusers have not been conducted in all population groups. We examined the renal and cardiovascular outcomes in users and nonusers enrolled in the Indian Chronic Kidney Disease (ICKD) Study. A total of 4,056 patients with mild-moderate CKD were studied. Patients were categorized as ACEI/ARB users or nonusers. Major adverse kidney events [ESKD (end stage kidney disease), ≥50% decline in eGFR and kidney death], all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular mortality were analyzed over a median follow-up period of 2.64 (1.40, 3.89) years between the two groups. Out of a total of 4,056 patients, 3,487 (87%) were hypertensive. The adjusted sub-hazard ratio (SHR) and 95 % CI for ACEI /ARB users was 0.85 (0.71, 1.02) for MAKE, 0.80 (0.64, 0.99) for a 50% decline in eGFR, and 0.72 (0.58, 0.90) for ESKD. For cardiovascular mortality, ACEI/ARB users were at lower risk (SHR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.34, 0.88). Diuretic users were at increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.50, 2.53) and cardiovascular mortality (adjusted SHR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.09, 2.73). There was non-significant association between the use of other antihypertensives and any of the end points. ACEI/ARB use is associated with slower rate of decline in eGFR in those with CKD stage 1-3. ACEI/ARB users had a significantly lower risk of renal outcomes, and cardiovascular mortality.

Antihypertensive Medication Class and the Risk of Dementia and Cognitive Decline in Older Adults: A Secondary Analysis of the Prospective HELIAD Cohort

It is unclear whether the main antihypertensive medication classes (diuretics, calcium channel blockers, beta-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs)) are associated with different risks of cognitive decline. Published evidence is conflicting and stems mainly from observational studies. To investigate the differential effects of antihypertensives on the risks of developing dementia and cognitive decline, with a specific focus on the vascular component of the mechanisms underlying these interactions. Older adults with a history of hypertension and without dementia were drawn from the population-based HELIAD cohort. Age-, gender-, education-, and antihypertensive medication- (five dichotomous exposures) adjusted Cox proportional-hazards models and generalized estimating equations were performed to appraise the associations of baseline antihypertensive therapy with dementia incidence and cognitive decline (quantified using a comprehensive neuropsychological battery). Analyses were subsequently adjusted for clinical vascular risk (dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, smoking, cardiovascular, and cerebrovascular history) and genetic susceptibility to stroke (using polygenic risk scores generated according to the MEGASTROKE consortium GWAS findings). A total of 776 predominantly female participants (73.61±4.94 years) with hypertension and a mean follow-up of 3.02±0.82 years were analyzed. Baseline treatment was not associated with the risk of incident dementia. ARB users experienced a slower yearly global cognitive [2.5% of a SD, 95% CI = (0.1, 4.9)] and language [4.4% of a SD, 95% CI = (1.4, 7.4)] decline compared to non-users. The fully adjusted model reproduced similar associations for both global cognitive [β= 0.027, 95% CI = (-0.003, 0.057)], and language decline [β= 0.063, 95% CI = (0.023, 0.104)]. ARBs may be superior to other antihypertensive agents in the preservation of cognition, an association probably mediated by vascular-independent mechanisms.

Different cardiovascular responses to exercise training in hypertensive women receiving β-blockers or angiotensin receptor blockers: A pilot study

ABSTRACT Aim To verify the influence of β-blockers or angiotensin receptor blockers on cardiovascular responses to exercise training in hypertensive post-menopausal women. Methods Postmenopausal women were allocated into: healthy control group (CON; n = 9); angiotensin receptor blockers users (ARB; n = 19); and β-adrenergic blockers users (BB; n = 19). Before and after 12 weeks of combined (aerobic and resistance) exercise training they were evaluated by: heart rate (HR) and its variability (HRV), blood pressure (BP) under stress (Cold pressor and Stroop color tests), and ambulatorial BP and its variability. Results In ambulatorial BP analysis only in ARB group awake systolic BP decreased (p = .011; ARB: From 122 ± 11 to 117 ± 9; BB: From 118 ± 7 to 114 ± 5; CON: From 121 ± 7 to 127 ± 11 mmHg). There were time effects in BP reactivity to stress, where BP reactivity after Stroop color and Cold pressor test decreased in all groups. In BP variability analysis, only BB group has significative decreased values in systolic SD24 (p = .007; ΔARB = −0.3 ± 2.0; ΔBB = −1.3 ± 2.0; ΔCON = 0.8 ± 1.7 mmHg) and SDdn (p = .006; ΔARB = −0.2 ± 1.6; ΔBB = −1.3 ± 2.0; ΔCON = 0.4 ± 2.1 mmHg). HRV analysis demonstrated that post-training, only in BB group LF/HF decreased (p = .001; ΔARB = 0.1 ± 0.8; ΔBB = −0.4 ± 1.5; ΔCON = 1.0 ± 1.7). Conclusion ARB present pronounced responses in awake ambulatorial systolic BP, while β-blockers users present greater responses in BP variability. Besides that, exercise can mitigate BP reactivity to stress with no differences between groups. Lastly, there were no major differences in HRV. Trial registry at “Clinicaltrials.gov” NCT03529838

Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker Associated With Less Outcome Risk in Patients With Acute Kidney Disease.

Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the respective use of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) on the outcomes of patients who could be weaned from dialysis-requiring acute kidney injury (AKI-D). Methods: This case–control study enrolled 41,731 patients who were weaned from AKI-D for at least 7 days from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Administration. We further grouped AKI-D patients according to ACEi and ARB use to evaluate subsequent risks of all-cause mortality and re-dialysis. The outcomes included the all-cause mortality and new-onset of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD; re-dialysis) following withdraw from AKI-D. Results: A total of 17,141 (41.1%) patients surviving AKI-D could be weaned from dialysis for at least 7 days. The overall events of mortality were 366 (48.9%) in ACEi users, 659 (52.1%) in ARB users, and 6,261 (41.3%) in ACEi/ARB nonusers, during a mean follow-up period of 1.01 years after weaning from AKI-D. In regard to all-cause of mortality, pre-dialysis ARB users had lower incidence than ACEi users [hazard ratio (HR 0.82), p = 0.017]. Compared with ACEi/ARB nonusers, continuing ARB users had a significantly low risk of long-term all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 0.51, p = 0.013) after propensity score matching. However, new users of ACEi at the acute kidney disease (AKD) period had a higher risk of re-dialysis after weaning than ACEi/ARB nonusers (aHR 1.82, p < 0.001), whereas neither ACEi nor ARB users confronted significantly increased risks of hyperkalemia after weaning. Conclusions: Compared with patients without ACEi/ARB, those continuing to use ARB before the event and after weaning had low all-cause mortality, while new users of ACEi at AKD had increased risk of re-dialysis. AKI-D patients continuing to use ACEi or ARB did not have higher risk of hyperkalemia. Future prospective randomized trials are expected to confirm these findings.

Association of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibition with Covid-19 hospitalization and all-cause mortality in the UK biobank.

With growing evidence on the protective effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), we aimed to thoroughly investigate the association between the use of major classes of antihypertensive medications and Covid-19 outcomes in comparison with the use of ACEIs and ARBs. We conducted a population-based study in patients with pre-existing hypertension in the UK Biobank with data from the first 2 SARS-CoV-2 waves prior population-based vaccination. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed adjusting for a wide range of confounders. The use of either β-blockers (BBs), calcium-channel blockers (CCBs) or diuretics was associated with a higher risk of Covid-19 hospitalization compared to ACEI use (adjusted OR (95%CI): 1.66 [1.43-1.93]) and ARB use (1.53 [1.30-1.81]). The risk of 28-day mortality among Covid-19 patients was also increased among users of BBs, CCBs or diuretics when compared to ACEI users (1.74 [1.30-2.33]) but not when compared to ARB users (1.26 [0.93-1.71]). The association between BB, CCB or diuretic use (compared to ACEI use) and 28-day mortality among hospitalized Covid-19 patients narrowly missed statistical significance (1.47 [0.99-2.18]) but it was statistically significant when the analysis was restricted to patients hospitalized during the second SARS-CoV-2 wave (1.80 [1.15-2.83]). Our results suggest protective effects of inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system on Covid-19 hospitalization and mortality, particularly with ACEI, among patients with pharmaceutically treated hypertension. If confirmed by randomized controlled trials, this finding could have high clinical relevance for treating hypertension during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors prevent liver-related events in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) can inhibit liver fibrogenesis in animal models. We aimed to evaluate the impact of ACEI/ARB use on the risk of liver cancer and cirrhosis complications in patients with NAFLD. We conducted a retrospective, territory-wide cohort study of adult patients with NAFLD diagnosed between January 2000 and December 2014 to allow for at least 5 years of follow-up. ACEI or ARB users were defined as patients who had received ACEI or ARB treatment for at least 6 months. The primary endpoint was liver-related events (LREs), defined as a composite endpoint of liver cancer and cirrhosis complications. We analyzed data from 12,327 NAFLD patients (mean age, 54.2±14.7 years; 6163 men [50.0%]); 6805 received ACEIs, and 2877 received ARBs. After propensity score weighting, ACEI treatment was associated with a lower risk of LREs (weighted subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 0.48; 95% CI, 0.35-0.66; p<0.001), liver cancer (weighted SHR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.28-0.75; p=0.002), and cirrhosis complications (weighted SHR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.27-0.66; p<0.001), but ARB was not. In subgroup analysis, ACEI treatment was associated with greater reduction in LREs in patients with chronic kidney diseases (CKDs) than those without (CKD-weighted SHR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.52-0.96; p=0.036; non-CKD-weighted SHR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.07-0.33; p<0.001). ACEI, rather than ARB, treatment is associated with a lower risk of LREs in NAFLD patients, especially among those with CKD.