Angiotensin-converting Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy Research Articles

The association between the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors /angiotensin receptor blockers and the development of ventilator-associated pneumonia in the intensive care unit: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundThis study was to examine the association between treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and the risk of developing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) among patients receiving mechanical ventilation (MV) in the intensive care unit (ICU).MethodsUtilizing a retrospective cohort approach, the data were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database. VAP diagnoses were ascertained through the international classification of disease codes recorded in the database. Both univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the association between ACEI or ARB use and VAP. Subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of comorbidities (AKI, renal failure, diabetes, hypertension, and sepsis), simplified acute physiology score II (SAPS II), as well as the use of vasopressors and antibiotics on this association. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used as the evaluation metrics.ResultsThe study comprised 8,888 patients, with 897 (10.09%) experiencing VAP. The analysis revealed that patients on ACEI or ARB therapy had a lower risk of developing VAP (OR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.62–0.99, P = 0.047). Subgroup analyses revealed that the protective effect was observed in patients with AKI (OR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.52–0.94, P = 0.020), renal failure (OR: 0.14, 95% CI: 0.02–0.84, P = 0.032), and diabetes (OR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.43–0.94, P = 0.024), as well as in those receiving vasopressors (OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.49–0.92, P = 0.012), and antibiotics (OR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.57–0.96, P = 0.021). No significant difference in VAP development was observed between patients treated with ACEI versus ARB (OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.49–1.47, P = 0.547).ConclusionThis study’s findings suggest a substantial association between the use of ACEIs or ARBs and reduced development of VAP, particularly among patients with specific comorbidities and those on vasopressor and antibiotic therapy. This study may educate the ICU team on the potential benefits of ACEIs and ARBs in preventing VAP, emphasizing the importance of considering these medications in the overall treatment plan.

Retrospective evaluation of risk factors for worsening renal function after angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor treatment in dogs.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) have the potential to cause worsening renal function (WRF). Therefore, reevaluation of renal function is recommended 1-2 weeks after starting ACEi therapy. To identify risk factors for WRF in dogs receiving ACEi for cardiac diseases, proteinuria, or systemic hypertension. A total of 156 client-owned dogs that received ACEi were included. Serum creatinine concentration was determined at the initial presentation and first reevaluation to detect and grade WRF (increase in sCr ≥ 0.3 mg/dL). Grade 1 (nonazotemic), 2 (mild), and 3 (moderate to severe) WRF were characterized by sCr remaining ≤1.6 mg/dL, 1.7-2.5 mg/dL increase, and 2.6-5.0 mg/dL increase, respectively. Demographic and serum chemistry data, such as total protein, albumin, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, symmetric dimethylarginine, glucose, triglyceride, total cholesterol concentrations, and serum electrolyte concentrations at first presentation, were evaluated. Multivariable modeling was performed to identify risk factors for WRF after treatment with ACEi. Worsening renal function was identified in 27/156 (17%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11-0.23) dogs after ACEi treatment. It was classified as Grades 1, 2, and 3 in 17, 2, and 8 dogs, respectively. The only significant factors associated with WRF in dogs receiving ACEi were concurrent administration of furosemide (odds ratio, 5.05; 95% CI, 2.05-12.4; P < .001) and pre-existing azotemia (odds ratio, 3.21; 95% CI, 1.28-8.03; P = .01). Although WRF is uncommon and mild, ACEi should be cautiously prescribed in dogs receiving furosemide or those with pre-existing azotemia.

The Impact of Heart Failure Chronic Treatment Prior to Cardiac Transplantation on Early Outcomes.

Background and Objectives: Cardiac transplantation represents the option for patients with end-stage heart failure (HF), providing the best survival rate. However, the postoperative complications of transplant patients remain a challenge for clinicians. The objective of our study was to evaluate the effect of preoperative chronic HF treatment on the occurrence of in-hospital complications. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively included a total of 50 patients who underwent cardiac transplantation between January 2011 and December 2023 from the Emergency Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases and Transplantation of Targu Mures. We correlated the preoperative chronic HF treatment with the postoperative complications by Spearmen's correlation coefficient, respectively. With logistic regression, the associations between the treatment and specific complications were determined. Results: Significant negative correlations were found between Carvedilol treatment with 2-month mortality (r = -0.30; 95% CI: -0.53--0.02; p = 0.03), Ramipril with hospital stay (r = -0.38; 95% CI: -0.60--0.12; p < 0.01) and intensive care unit (ICU) stay (r = -0.37; 95% CI: -0.59--0.11; p = 0.01), and Spironolactone usage with hospitalization duration (r = -0.28; 95% CI: -0.52--0.01; p = 0.04). Furthermore, Carvedilol treatment represented a protective factor against early acute kidney injury (AKI) (OR: 0.22; 95% CI: 0.05-0.91; p = 0.03). Spironolactone treatment was a protective factor against AGR (OR: 0.12; 95% CI: 0.02-0.66; p = 0.01) treatment, in contrast to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) therapy (OR: 5.30; 95% CI: 1.03-27.17; p = 0.04). Conclusions: Pre-transplant Carvedilol treatment was negatively correlated with the 2-month mortality rate. Ramipril and Spironolactone therapy were negatively correlated with hospitalization duration, and Ramipril was additionally correlated with ICU stay. Moreover, Carvedilol therapy represented a protective factor against early AKI. Pre-transplant Spironolactone was associated with lower event rates of AGR, in contrast to ACEI treatment. Prospective studies with larger cohorts are needed in order to draw drastic conclusions.

Clinical and genetic analysis of a child with co-morbid progressive IgA nephropathy and COQ8B-associated glomerulopathy

To explore the genetic etiology and clinical outcome of a child with co-morbid progressive IgA nephropathy and COQ8B-associated glomerulopathy. A child who was admitted to Peking University First Hospital on March 2, 2021 was selected as the study subject. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples from the child and his parents and sister. Whole exome sequencing was carried out, and candidate variant was verified by Sanger sequencing. This study was approved by the Peking University First Hospital (Ethics No. 2016[1029]). The child, a 7-year-old boy who had developed proteinuria 8 months before, was diagnosed with IgA nephropathy (M1E1S1T1C1). With steroid, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy, partial remission of proteinuria was achieved. However, his serum creatinine level had increased from 53.8 mol/L at the onset of disease to 86.7 mol/L after 3.9 years, along with massive proteinuria. Kidney biopsy still indicated IgA nephropathy (M0E0S1T0C0). The child was found to harbor a homozygous c.737G>A (p.Ser246Asn) missense variant of the COQ8B gene, for which his parents and sister were heterozygous carriers. The variant was predicted to be pathogenic (PS1+PM2_Supporting+PM3+PP3+PP4) based on the guidelines from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. The child was treated with high-dose coenzyme Q10 in combination with steroid and/or mycophenolate mofetil, though his serum creatinine level still increased to 286 mol/L after 7.3 years, which conformed to a chronic kidney disorder with glomerular filtration rate category of G3b. The homozygous c.737G>A missense variants of the COQ8B gene probably underlay the progressive kidney dysfunction in this child. For children with IgA nephropathy presenting with atypical clinical manifestations, unsatisfactory therapeutic effect, and/or early onset of kidney function decline, coexistence of other diseases should be suspected.

Kidney Outcomes Following Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor vs Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor/Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Therapy for Thrombotic Microangiopathy.

Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) on kidney biopsy is a pattern of endothelial injury commonly seen in malignant hypertension (mHTN), but treatment strategies are not well established. To evaluate the kidney outcomes of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), specifically sacubitril/valsartan, vs angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) therapy for patients with mHTN-associated TMA. This single-center cohort study enrolled consecutive patients in China diagnosed with mHTN-associated TMA through kidney biopsy from January 2008 to June 2023. Follow-up was conducted until the conclusion of the study period. Data were analyzed in September 2023. Treatment with sacubitril/valsartan or ACEI/ARBs during hospitalization and after discharge. The primary outcome was a composite of kidney recovery: a 50% decrease in serum creatinine level, decrease in serum creatinine levels to the reference range, or kidney survival free from dialysis for more than 1 month. The secondary and tertiary outcomes were a 15% increase in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) relative to baseline and kidney survival free from dialysis, respectively. Propensity score matching (PSM) and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were used to evaluate the association between sacubitril/valsartan and ACEI/ARB therapy with kidney recovery outcomes. Among the 217 patients (mean [SD] age, 35.9 [8.8] years; 188 men [86.6%]) included in the study, 66 (30.4%) received sacubitril/valsartan and 151 (69.6%) received ACEI/ARBs at baseline. Sacubitril/valsartan treatment was associated with shorter time to the primary outcome compared with ACEI/ARB treatment (20 of 63 [31.7%] vs 38 of 117 [32.5%]; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.85; 95% CI, 1.05-3.23). Sacubitril/valsartan treatment was independently associated with shorter time to a 15% increase in eGFR (15 of 46 [32.6%] vs 46 of 83 [55.4%]; aHR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.09-4.17) and kidney survival free from dialysis (11 of 23 [47.8%] vs 16 of 57 [28.1%]; aHR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.15-5.88) compared with ACEI/ARB treatment. These differences remained significant in the PSM comparison. In this cohort study, sacubitril/valsartan treatment was associated with a potential kidney function benefit in patients with mHTN-associated TMA compared with ACEI/ARB treatment. The findings suggested that sacubitril/valsartan could be a superior therapeutic approach for managing this serious condition in terms of kidney recovery.

СПЕКТР КЛИНИЧЕСКИХ ПРОЯВЛЕНИЙ Х-СЦЕПЛЕННОГО СИНДРОМА АЛЬПОРТА У ДЕВОЧЕК: ОДНОЦЕНТРОЕ КОГОРТНОЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЕ

X-linked Alport syndrome (XLAS) is an inherited disorder caused by genetic variants in gene COL4A5. The frequency and the severity of clinical manifestations as well as the risk of glomerulopathy progression are variable in XLAS in females, and the disease course features have not been sufficiently studied as yet. Since patient management tactics is determined by the disease course nature, studying the spectrum of XLAS clinical manifestations and prognosis in girls remains relevant. The purpose of this research was to determine the spectrum and the features of clinical manifestations of XLAS in girls. Materials and methods used: a single-center cohort prospective study was carried out by the Authors that included 74 girls aged 2 to 17 y/o with genetically proven XLAS diagnosis. Authors have analyzed the patients’ medical records identifying sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), arterial hypertension (AH; blood pressure (BP) over 95% than at the patient’s age/height), albuminuria (Alb; norm&lt;30 mg/mmol of creatinine), proteinuria (Pr; norm&lt;100 mg/sq m/day) - with its degree, decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, ml/min/1.73 sq m; norm≥90 ml/min/1.73 sq m) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) therapy data. Results: all patients had hematuria with episodical macrohematuria in 27% of cases, proteinuria in 40%, eGFR decrease in 15%, SNHL in 8% and peripheral retinopathy in 7%. Girls with missense v. those with non-missense variants of COL4A5 more often had macrohematuria (0.15 v. 0.05; p=0.015) and albuminuria (1 v. 0.5; p&lt;0.001) whilst no statistically significant difference was showed in proteinuria frequency and age of onset (0.48 v. 0.5 and 6.5 [3; 11] v. 5 [5; 8] y/o), eGFR decrease (0.15 v. 0.15; 12.4±2.6 v. 13.2 ±2.8 y/o), SNHL (0.07 v. 0.1; 13±2.8 v. 14.4±3.1 y/o) and retinopathy (0.04 v. 0.15; 14.3±3.5 v. 12.6±2.9 y/o). ACEIs therapy did not show any statistically significant effect on the cumulative proportion of patients with both proteinuria and eGFR decrease (log-rank test=1.25, p=0.213 and log-rank test=0.66, p=0.512, respectively). Conclusion: the results obtained demonstrate the need for a dynamic follow-up of girls with XLAS with the purpose of earliest possible detection of proteinuria and timely prescribing with nephroprotective therapy as well as hearing loss diagnosing and timely audiological correction.

Angiotensin Receptor Blockers Versus Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors in Acute Myocardial Infarction Without Heart Failure

BackgroundWhether angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) can be an alternative to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) in patients without heart failure (HF) after acute myocardial infarction (MI) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between initial ARB and ACEI therapy in patients with MI without HF. MethodsBetween 2010 and 2016, a total of 31,013 patients who underwent coronary revascularization for MI with prescription of ARBs or ACEIs at hospital discharge were enrolled from the Korean nationwide medical insurance data. Patients who had HF at index MI were excluded. The primary outcome was all-cause death. The secondary outcomes included recurrent MI, hospitalization for new heart HF, stroke, and a composite of each outcome. ResultsOf 31,013 patients, ARBs were prescribed in 12,685 (40.9%) and ACEIs in 18,328 (59.1%). Patients receiving ARBs had a lower discontinuation rate compared with those receiving ACEIs (28.2% vs 43.5%, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31-0.37; P < .01). During a median follow-up of 2.2 years, 2480 patients died. The incidence rate of all-cause death in patients receiving ARBs and those receiving ACEIs was 27.7 and 22.9 per 1000 person-years, respectively (adjusted HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.95-1.13; P = .40). There were no significant differences in the secondary outcomes between patients receiving ARBs and those receiving ACEIs, except stroke (19.2 vs 13.6 per 1000 person-years; adjusted HR 1.17; 95% CI 1.04-1.32; P = .01). In a subgroup analysis, a higher mortality was observed with ARBs compared with ACEIs in patients with diabetes. ConclusionsIn this nationwide cohort, there was no significant difference in the incidence of all-cause death between ARBs and ACEIs as discharge medications in patients with myocardial infarction without heart failure. Angiotensin II receptor blockers would be an alternative to ACEIs for those intolerant to ACEI therapy.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors or Angiotensin-Receptor Blockers for Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease : A Systematic Review and Retrospective Individual Participant-Level Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials.

In patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), the effects of initiating treatment with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) or angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB) on the risk for kidney failure with replacement therapy (KFRT) and death remain unclear. To examine the association of ACEi or ARB treatment initiation, relative to a non-ACEi or ARB comparator, with rates of KFRT and death. Ovid Medline and the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration Clinical Trials Consortium from 1946 through 31 December 2023. Completed randomized controlled trials testing either an ACEi or an ARB versus a comparator (placebo or antihypertensive drugs other than ACEi or ARB) that included patients with a baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) below 30 mL/min/1.73 m2. The primary outcome was KFRT, and the secondary outcome was death before KFRT. Analyses were done using Cox proportional hazards models according to the intention-to-treat principle. Prespecified subgroup analyses were done according to baseline age (<65 vs. ≥65 years), eGFR (<20 vs. ≥20 mL/min/1.73 m2), albuminuria (urine albumin-creatinine ratio <300 vs. ≥300 mg/g), and history of diabetes. A total of 1739 participants from 18 trials were included, with a mean age of 54.9 years and mean eGFR of 22.2 mL/min/1.73 m2, of whom 624 (35.9%) developed KFRT and 133 (7.6%) died during a median follow-up of 34 months (IQR, 19 to 40 months). Overall, ACEi or ARB treatment initiation led to lower risk for KFRT (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.55 to 0.79]) but not death (hazard ratio, 0.86 [CI, 0.58 to 1.28]). There was no statistically significant interaction between ACEi or ARB treatment and age, eGFR, albuminuria, or diabetes (P for interaction > 0.05 for all). Individual participant-level data for hyperkalemia or acute kidney injury were not available. Initiation of ACEi or ARB therapy protects against KFRT, but not death, in people with advanced CKD. National Institutes of Health. (PROSPERO: CRD42022307589).

#530 Cardiorenal effects of dual blockade with ACE inhibitors and ARBs among people with CKD: emulation of a reference trial (ONTARGET) using CPRD

Abstract Background and Aims Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of death globally, and individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased risk. Results from the ONTARGET trial, in conjunction with the ALTITUDE and VA-Nephron-D studies, led to an end of recommendations for dual ACE inhibitor and ARB therapy due to an increase in acute kidney injury. However, these studies had low power to address long-term kidney outcomes and there remains uncertainty about whether dual therapy could be effective at reducing adverse cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with CKD. Observational data provides an opportunity to explore such hypotheses in subgroups underrepresented in trials and with power and follow-up enabling estimation of risk of rare outcomes. We aimed to use ONTARGET to perform a reference trial emulation analysis, before extending analysis to explore treatment effectiveness of dual ARB and ACEi use vs ACEi alone in preventing cardiovascular and renal outcomes among those with CKD. Method Using routinely-collected data from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum linked with Hospital Episode Statistics secondary care data, we applied the ONTARGET trial eligibility criteria to patients prescribed an ARB/ACE inhibitor between 1/1/2001-31/7/2019. As the number of patients receiving prescriptions for both medications on the same day was likely to be small in routine care, we used an operational definition to capture dual users. Outcomes included ONTARGET primary cardiovascular composite outcome of cardiovascular-related death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or hospitalisation for heart failure and a composite renal outcome of ≥50% reduction in GFR or end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Within the trial-eligible cohort, outcomes of interest were compared between groups prescribed dual therapy vs ACE inhibitors alone using a propensity-score—weighted time-to-event analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model. Conditional on successfully benchmarking results against the ONTARGET trial, we explored treatment effect heterogeneity by chronic kidney disease (CKD) at baseline, with CKD defined as estimated glomerular rate (eGFR) &amp;lt; 60 ml/min/1.73 m2. Results 412,406 trial-eligible patients in CPRD were included in analysis. Among those with non-missing eGFR at baseline, 37% had CKD (Table 1). We found similar effectiveness of dual therapy and ACE inhibitors in reducing the risk of the primary composite cardiovascular outcome (HR 0.98 (95% CI: 0.93, 1.03), consistent with the ONTARGET trial results (HR 0.99 (95% CI: 0.92, 1.07), with no evidence of heterogeneity by CKD (P-value for interaction = 0.14). However, dual therapy use was associated with a greater risk for the composite renal outcome compared to ACE inhibitor, HR 1.24 (95% CI: 1.14, 1.35), with no evidence of heterogeneity by CKD (P = 0.93) (Fig. 1). Analysing components of the composite renal outcome separately gave consistent results (≥50% reduction in GFR: HR 1.22 (95% CI: 1.12, 1.33); ESKD: HR 1.34 (95% CI: 1.24, 1.57)), as did a post-hoc sensitivity analysis by proteinuria status (no proteinuria: HR 1.28 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.59); proteinuria: 1.27 (95% CI: 1.08, 1.49)). Conclusion We found evidence that dual therapy use was associated with increased risk of renal outcomes in both those with and without CKD at baseline. Applying a reference trial emulation approach and successfully benchmarking findings against ONTARGET, where confounding was not present due to randomisation, provides confidence in the validity of these results.

#2954 A comparative view of IgA nephropathy care across four global regions

Abstract Background and Aims IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is a chronic, rare, and slow progressing glomerular disease. IgAN treatment currently consists of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, corticosteroids, and recently approved Nefecon and sparsentan in select markets. This research compares approaches to IgAN treatment in four regions of the world. Method Data was collected in partnership with 730 nephrologists submitting chart data from 1,570 of their most recently seen IgAN patients to create a representative sample across the US, EU5 (UK, Germany, Italy, France, and Spain), Japan, and China via parallel online surveys in 2023. Results Regardless of their geographic location, audited patient charts revealed that hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity, and diabetes were the leading comorbid conditions among IgAN patients. Across the four regions evaluated, Japanese patients were the healthiest (44% have no comorbid conditions vs. 28% EU5, 25% China, 18% US) and Japanese nephrologists perceived 79% of their IgAN patients to be in “excellent” overall health. Comparatively, patients in the US had the highest calculated body mass index (28.2) and the most comorbid conditions reported. Audited records also revealed that patients in Japan and China were referred to nephrology care earlier in their CKD progression as measured by eGFR levels, with over 50% of patients referred to their current nephrologist in CKD Stages 1 or 2, compared to approximately 35% of patients in the US and EU5. Chinese nephrologists (59%) and those in the US (53%) were most likely to agree that it is easy to identify IgAN patients who are likely to have rapid progression (vs. 43% EU5 and 40% Japan). When treating their IgAN patients, Japanese nephrologists ordered labs on a more frequent basis compared to those in the US, EU5, and China and on average, Japanese patients had blood work and urinalysis labs conducted six times within the past twelve months (versus four in the other countries.) Most audited patients had a calculated annual eGFR decline of 1 ml/year or more. Chinese patients (77%) were most notable for their IgAN progression, while those in Japan were least likely to be progressing in their disease (41%). Due to its chronic nature, most IgAN patients will eventually need dialysis, and while still representative of the majority of their audited patients, US nephrologists projected the lowest percentage of IgAN patients to eventually progress to end stage renal disease (66% vs. 73% Japan, 75% EU5, and 85% China). Most participating nephrologists reported that they closely adhere to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines when treating their IgAN patients. Nearly all audited IgAN patients were on baseline therapy of ACE inhibitors or ARBs, while the uptake of SGLT2 inhibitors has been notable in China (44%), the US (43%), and EU5 (43%), with Japan (33%) trailing in current treatment rates. Meanwhile, the use of corticosteroid was also higher in patients in Japan (65%) and China (59%) compared to those in the EU5 (51%) and US (43%). Of note, tonsillectomies are frequently used as a treatment approach for IgAN patients in Japan, with 45% of patients having received the procedure, whereas this approach is used much less often in the other regions. Following a tonsillectomy, nearly all Japanese patients received a pulse of steroids, leading to higher overall corticosteroid use compared to other regions. At the time of fielding, Nefecon was available to prescribe in the US and Germany with 9% and 7% of patients currently on treatment, respectfully; however, sparsentan had not been approved in any regions. Conclusion The comparison of patient chart data across various regions reveals differences in perspectives and IgAN treatment approaches among nephrologists. Prognostic and predictive tools are available and utilized globally, but the reliability and correlation between results, lab values, and disease progression calls for better education and alignment of global treatment guidelines.

Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers for preventing the progression of diabetic kidney disease.

Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers for preventing the progression of diabetic kidney disease.

Mathematical modelling of the influence of ACE I/D polymorphism on blood pressure and antihypertensive therapy

The angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene (ACE) insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism raises the possibility of personalising ACE inhibitor therapy to optimise its efficiency and reduce side effects in genetically distinct subgroups. However, the extent of its influence among these subgroups is unknown. Therefore, we extended our computational model of blood pressure regulation to investigate the effect of the ACE I/D polymorphism on haemodynamic parameters in humans undergoing antihypertensive therapy. The model showed that the dependence of blood pressure on serum ACE activity is a function of saturation and therefore, the lack of association between ACE I/D and blood pressure levels may be due to high ACE activity in specific populations. Additionally, in an extended model simulating the effects of different classes of antihypertensive drugs, we explored the relationship between ACE I/D and the efficacy of inhibitors of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system. The model predicted that the response of cardiovascular and renal parameters to treatment directly depends on ACE activity. However, significant differences in parameter changes were observed only between groups with high and low ACE levels, while different ACE I/D genotypes within the same group had similar changes in absolute values. We conclude that a single genetic variant is responsible for only a small fraction of heredity in treatment success and its predictive value is limited.

The Potential Role of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Beta-Blockers in Reducing Pneumonia Severity in Older Adults.

Background Understanding the impact of pharmacological therapy on pneumonia severity is crucial for effective clinical management. The impact of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) and beta-blockers (BBs) on pneumonia severity remains unknown, warranting further investigation. Methodology This retrospective study examined the hospital records of inpatients (≥75 years) admitted with community-acquired pneumonia in 2021. Pneumonia severity associated with the use of pre-established ACEi and BB therapy was documented using CURB-65 (confusion, uraemia, respiratory rate, blood pressure, age ≥65 years) and pneumonia severity index (PSI) scores. Descriptive statistics and multivariable linear regression were used to analyse differences across BB therapy, ACEi therapy, their combination, or neither (control group). Results A total of 803 patient records were examined, of whom 382 (47.6%) were male and 421 (52.4%) were female. Sample sizes for each group were as follows: control (n = 492), BB only (n = 185), ACEi only (n = 68), and BB + ACEi (n = 58). Distribution of aspiration pneumonia (AP) versus non-AP for each group, respectively, was control (21.1% vs. 78.9%), BB only (9.7% vs. 90.3%), ACEi only (7.3% vs. 92.7%), and ACEi + BB (12.1% vs. 87.9%). No significant differences in PSI and CURB-65 scores were found between intervention groups even after controlling for patient characteristics and irrespective of AP or non-AP aetiology. Patients with AP had significantly higher CURB-65 (p = 0.026) and PSI scores (p = 0.044) compared to those with non-AP. Conclusions Pre-prescribed ACEi or BB therapy did not appear to be associated with differences in pneumonia severity. There were no differences in pneumonia severity scores with ACEi and BB monotherapy or combined ACEi and BB therapy.

Isolated Laryngeal Angioedema in a Patient with Long-term ACE Inhibitor Use: A Case Report.

Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor-associated angioedema is the most common cause of angioedema seen in the emergency department (ED) and can be associated with a high morbidity. Most cases occur within months of initiation of an ACE inhibitor and are associated with facial and/or oropharyngeal swelling. We present a case of isolated laryngeal edema requiring intubation following 10years of ACE inhibitor therapy. An 82-year-old female, who was on lisinopril therapy for 10years, presented to the ED with shortness of breath and a sensation that her throat was swelling. She appeared to be in mild respiratory distress and could only speak in one-word sentences. On the physical exam, there was no swelling in the tongue, lips, or face, and the uvula was midline. There was mild posterior pharyngeal edema and swelling noted, but the airway was not visibly obstructed. She was tachypneic and stridor was present. After no improvement with medications, anesthesia successfully intubated her in the operating room. It was deemed a difficult airway secondary to posterior pharyngeal erythema and edema. She was diagnosed with ACE inhibitor-associated angioedema and was extubated four days later. Her lisinopril was discontinued, and she has not had a recurrence of angioedema. ACE inhibitor-induced angioedema commonly presents with facial and oropharyngeal swelling. Its recognition, even years after starting an ACE inhibitor, is necessary to ensure swift and appropriate treatment of potentially life-threatening posterior pharyngeal edema.

Get reliable laboratory findings- how to recognize the deceptive effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy in the laboratory diagnostics of sarcoidosis?

Serum angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) is the only biomarker routinely used in the laboratory diagnostics of sarcoidosis, and ACE inhibitor (ACEi) drugs are among the most prescribed drugs worldwide. Taking ACEi can mislead medical teams by lowering ACE activity, delaying diagnosis and giving a false impression of disease activity of sarcoidosis. We aimed to develop a simple method to detect the presence of ACEi drugs in samples, to investigate the ACEi medication-caused interference and consequences in a retrospective study. ACE activity and the level of ACE inhibition were determined for 1823 patients with suspected sarcoidosis. These values were compared with the therapeutic information at the first and follow-up visits. A total of 302 patients had biochemical evidence of an ACEi drug effect during diagnostic ACE activity testing. In their case, ACE activity was significantly lower (median(IQR): 4.41 U/L(2.93-6.72)) than in patients not taking ACEi (11.32 U/L(8.79-13.92), p<0.01). In 62 sarcoidosis patients, the ACEi reduced ACE activity to the reference range or below. Only in 40 % of the cases was the medication list recorded in the outpatient chart and only in 3 cases was low ACE activity associated with ACEi use. 67 % of the repeated ACE activity measurements were also performed during ACEi therapy. Our study revealed that the use of ACEi is common in patients with suspected sarcoidosis. The ACE activity lowering effect of ACEi drugs may escape the attention of medical teams which can lead to diagnostic errors and unnecessary tests. Nevertheless, these pitfalls can be avoided by using a method suggested by our team.

The role of angiotensin converting enzyme (insertion)/(deletion) and angiotensin II type 1 receptor (A1166C) gene polymorphisms in antiproteinuric effect of ACE inhibitors in type 2 diabetic Iraqi patients

The angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) I\D gene polymorphism influences the blood ACE enzyme activity. Renoprotective effect of ACE inhibitors (ACEIs) varies among patients due to genetic variation, particularly in Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System genes. This study investigates the genetic variations of ACE I\D and AGT1RA1166C gene polymorphisms in the antiproteinuric effect of ACEI therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. This is a cross-sectional study that included 76 T2DM patients who are ACEI users, divided into two groups: T2DM without diabetic kidney disease (DKD) included 31 patients, and T2DM with DKD included 45 patients. Urine samples were taken for measurement of urine albumin and creatinine, then calculation of albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR). Blood samples were taken for the measurement of serum parameters and also for the extraction of DNA for genetic evaluation of ACEI/D and AGT1RA1166C gene polymorphisms. The results reveal that T2DM patients carrying the ID genotype have significantly lower ACE1 levels compared to DD and II carriers (p = 0.012). When grouping patients according to the ACR, serum ACE1 and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) levels were higher in DKD compared to normalbuminuric patients, with the only significant difference for ACE2. After subdividing according to ACE I\D genotypes, the ACE2 differences were only significant in DD genotype carriers (p = 0.049) between DKD and normalbuminuric groups. While for AGT1RA1166C polymorphisms, the AC genotype shows non-significantly lower levels for ACE1 and ACE2. After subdividing according to AGT1RA1166C genotypes, ACE2 levels were significantly higher in DKD patients carrying the AA genotype (p = 0.015). Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that both ACE (I\D) and AGT1RA1166C genes are significant predictors of ACE1 levels after controlling age, gender, and DKD state. This study concluded that both genes are predictors of ACE1 levels; in addition, ID genotype carriers and AC genotype carriers had lower ACE1 and ACE2 levels with lower ACR and higher glomerular filtration rate, identifying better ACEIs responses in ID and AC carriers.

Enalapril Is Superior to Lisinopril in Improving Endothelial Function without a Difference in Blood-Pressure-Lowering Effects in Newly Diagnosed Hypertensives.

Here, we tested if lipophilicity affects the efficacy of ACE inhibitory drugs when used as the first therapy in newly identified hypertensives in a prospective study. We tested the differences in the cardiovascular efficacy of the hydrophilic lisinopril (8.3 ± 3.0 mg/day) and the lipophilic enalapril (5.5 ± 2.3 mg/day) (n = 59 patients). The cardiovascular parameters were determined using sonography (flow-mediated dilation (FMD) in the brachial artery, intima-media thickness of the carotid artery), 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (peripheral arterial blood pressure), and arteriography (aortic blood pressure, augmentation index, and pulse wave velocity) before and after the initiation of ACE inhibitor therapy. Both enalapril and lisinopril decreased blood pressure. However, lisinopril failed to improve arterial endothelial function (lack of effects on FMD) when compared to enalapril. Enalapril-mediated improved arterial endothelial function (FMD) positively correlated with its blood-pressure-lowering effect. In contrast, there was no correlation between the decrease in systolic blood pressure and FMD in the case of lisinopril treatment. The blood-pressure-lowering effects of ACE inhibitor drugs are independent of their lipophilicity. In contrast, the effects of ACE inhibition on arterial endothelial function are associated with lipophilicity: the hydrophilic lisinopril was unable to improve, while the lipophilic enalapril significantly improved endothelial function. Moreover, the effects on blood pressure and endothelial function did not correlate in lisinopril-treated patients, suggesting divergent mechanisms in the regulation of blood pressure and endothelial function upon ACE inhibitory treatment.

Effect of vitamin D receptor genetic polymorphism on the clinical response to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors therapy among breast cancer patients with chemotherapy induced cardiomyopathy

Abstract Background Blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is the cornerstone treatment of chemotherapy induced cardiomyopathy (CIC) yet, variability in response to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) acting on the RAAS is well-documented. Vitamin D was found to play a role in regulating RAAS. Previous studies revealed an inverse relationship between levels of vitamin D in serum and RAAS activation. Purpose The current study is primarily to evaluate the association between genetic variants in the vitamin D receptor (VDR) and clinical response to ACEIs among breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy with CIC. Methods A total of 60 breast cancer patients with CIC (mean ejection fraction 30%) on β-blocker therapy were started on a ACEIs and followed for 6 months. Post-ACEIs-treatment changes in ejection fraction (EF) and serum potassium (K) were evaluated. We genotyped VDR gene polymorphisms including; ApaI (rs7975232), TaqI (rs731236), BsmI (rs1544410) and FokI (rs2228570) variants using TaqMan technique. Stepwise linear regression was performed to identify genetic and clinical factors associated with variability in ACEIs response, with adjustment for all potential confounding covariates. Results BsmI (rs1544410) (CT) heterozygous and TaqI (rs731236) (GA) genotypes had a significant increase in EF (12.8% and 10.8 %, respectively) and serum K (1.1 mEq/L and 0.91 mEq/L respectively); adjusted-p = 0.0001 and 0.004 for ∆EF and adjusted-p = 0.005 and 0.002 for ∆K. In contrast, (AA) homozygous carriers of the ApaI SNP (rs7975232) had a smaller increase in EF (∆EF = 1.2%) and K (∆K = 0.1 mEq/L) compared to (CA) (∆EF = 6.5%, ∆K = 0.73mEq/L) and (CC) (∆EF = 9%, ∆K = 0.9mEq/L) carriers; adjusted-p = 0.003 for ∆EF, adjusted-p = 0.004 for ∆K. Finally, for the FokI SNP (rs2228570), there was no significant change in EF and serum K level. Conclusion The results from this study highlight that BsmI (rs1544410) and TaqI (rs731236) are strong predictors of response to ACEIs therapy in chemotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy (CIC).

ACE I/D genotype associates with strength in sarcopenic men but not with response to ACE inhibitor therapy in older adults with sarcopenia: Results from the LACE trial.

Angiotensin II (AII), has been suggested to promote muscle loss. Reducing AII synthesis, by inhibiting angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) activity has been proposed as a method to inhibit muscle loss. The LACE clinical trial was designed to determine whether ACE inhibition would reduce further muscle loss in individuals with sarcopenia but suffered from low recruitment and returned a negative result. Polymorphic variation in the ACE promoter (I/D alleles) has been associated with differences in ACE activity and muscle physiology in a range of clinical conditions. This aim of this analysis was to determine whether I/D polymorphic variation is associated with muscle mass, strength, in sarcopenia or contributed to the lack of response to treatment in the LACE study. Sarcopenic individuals were recruited into a 2x2 factorial multicentre double-blind study of the effects of perindopril and/or leucine versus placebo on physical performance and muscle mass. DNA extracted from blood samples (n = 130 72 women and 58 men) was genotyped by PCR for the ACE I/D polymorphism. Genotypes were then compared with body composition measured by DXA, hand grip and quadriceps strength before and after 12 months' treatment with leucine and/or perindopril in a cross-sectional analysis of the influence of genotype on these variables. Allele frequencies for the normal UK population were extracted from 13 previous studies (I = 0.473, D = 0.527). In the LACE cohort the D allele was over-represented (I = 0.412, D = 0.588, p = 0.046). This over-representation was present in men (I = 0.353, D = 0.647, p = 0.010) but not women (I = 0.458, D = 0.532, p = 0.708). In men but not women, individuals with the I allele had greater leg strength (II/ID = 18.00 kg (14.50, 21.60) vs DD = 13.20 kg (10.50, 15.90), p = 0.028). Over the 12 months individuals with the DD genotype increased in quadriceps strength but those with the II or ID genotype did not. Perindopril did not increase muscle strength or mass in any polymorphism group relative to placebo. Our results suggest that although ACE genotype was not associated with response to ACE inhibitor therapy in the LACE trial population, sarcopenic men with the ACE DD genotype may be weaker than those with the ACE I/D or II genotype.

Response and survival of dogs with proteinuria (UPC > 2.0) treated with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) are a recommended treatment for glomerular proteinuria. Frequency of response to ACEi and the association of achieving proposed urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPC) targets on survival is unknown. To determine response rates to ACEi therapy and whether a positive response is associated with improved survival. Eighty-five dogs with proteinuria (UPC > 2.0). Retrospective study including dogs (UPC > 2.0) prescribed an ACEi for treatment of proteinuria. Baseline creatinine, albumin, cholesterol, UPC, and systolic blood pressure were recorded, and cases reviewed to track UPC. Treatment response was defined as achieving a UPC of <0.5 or reduction of ≥50% from baseline within 3 months. Outcome data were collected to determine overall and 12-month survival. Thirty-five (41%) dogs responded to ACEi treatment. Treatment response was statistically associated with both median survival time (664 days [95% confidence interval (CI): 459-869] for responders compared to 177 [95% CI: 131-223] for non-responders) and 12-month survival (79% responders alive compared to 28% non-responders). Baseline azotemia or hypoalbuminemia were also associated with a worse prognosis, with odds ratios of death at 12 months of 5.34 (CI: 1.85-17.32) and 4.51 (CI: 1.66-13.14), respectively. In the 25 dogs with normal baseline creatinine and albumin, response to treatment was associated with 12-month survival (92% responders alive compared to 54% non-responders, P = .04). When the UPC is >2.0, achieving recommended UPC targets within 3 months appears to be associated with a significant survival benefit. Response to treatment is still associated with survival benefit in dogs with less severe disease (no azotemia or hypoalbuminemia).