Aneurysm-related Death Research Articles

Abstract 4138322: Do branched stent grafts for dissecting aortic aneurysms really improve long-term outcomes?

Backgrounds: We have previously used a handmade branched stent graft (SG) to treat thoracic aortic aneurysms. In this study, we examined the long-term results of treatment for dissecting thoracic aortic aneurysms. Methods: Between 2004 and 2014, we treated 28 patients with dissecting thoracic aneurysms using the branched SGs. Results: The mean age was 65 ± 14 years; 17 were over 70, and 22 were male. The mean time from the onset of dissection was 5.7 ± 6.3 years; 6 were operated within one year. The mean aneurysm diameter was 59 ± 8 mm. All dissecting aneurysms were located after zone 3. SG branches were one in 24 cases, two in 2, and three in 2. Twenty-two were treated for entry closure and distal landing in the true lumen. Six with limited dissecting aneurysms were treated for entry closure and distal landing in a non-dissected lumen. The cause of perioperative death was pneumonia in 1. The mean follow-up was 8.3 ± 5.3 years. Entry closure was achieved at 86%, branch patency was 94%, and aneurysm diameter was reduced by an average of 5 ± 14%. There were 6 aneurysm-related deaths. Two were aneurysm ruptures, and each of the 4 was additional operative death, sudden death, SMA occlusion, and type A dissection. The aneurysm-related mortality was 26% at eight years; there was no difference between under 70 and over 70 years old. The cumulative risk of additional procedures was 57% at eight years, and the risk was higher in those over 70 than those under 70 (p<0.05). Thirteen required additional procedures, and 5 required multiple. In detail, re-TEVAR to distal SINE was in 7, re-TEVAR for aneurysm enlargement due to residual false lumen was in 1, re-TEVAR for type 1a endoleak (EL) was in 4, open repair was in 3, stenting for stenosis of true lumen in iliac artery was in 1, stenting for SG branches were in 2, and embolization of the left subclavian artery after re-TEVAR was in 1. Details of open repair were partial arch and thoracic descending replacement for type 1a EL in 1, ascending and partial arch replacement for type 1a EL followed by partial arch and thoracoabdominal replacement in 1, partial arch and thoracoabdominal replacement for distal SINE and aneurysm enlargement in 1. Conclusion: The branched SG for dissecting thoracic aneurysms successfully achieved the initial goal of entry closure, which concept is promising, but requires careful observation for appropriate additional procedures.

Clinical impact of proximal fixation augmentation using the Najuta thoracic fenestrated stent graft during endovascular treatment for distal aortic arch aneurysm

ObjectivePrevention of late type 1a endoleaks is the main concern in thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (TEVAR) for thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA). Since 2017, we have performed zone 0 TEVAR with proximal fixation augmentation using a Najuta thoracic fenestrated stent graft in addition to zone 2 TEVAR for distal arch aneurysms. We report the early-midterm outcomes of TEVAR performed using this strategy. MethodsThis single-center retrospective study enrolled 386 cases of TEVAR for thoracic aortic disease between January 2013 and December 2020. Patients with TAA treated by TEVAR landing at zone 2 was referred to as the Standard group (S group), whereas those treated by TEVAR landing at zone 0 using a Najuta fenestrated stent graft in addition to zone 2 TEVAR was referred to as the Augmentation group (A group). We retrospectively compared the clinical outcomes between the two groups. The primary endpoint was secondary intervention for postoperative type1a endoleaks. Secondary endpoints were technical success, aneurysm-related death (ARD), and major adverse events (MAEs) including stroke, paraplegia, endoleaks, and secondary interventions. ResultsWe performed TEVAR in 41 and 30 cases in the S and A groups, respectively. The mean aneurysm sizes in the S and A group were 54.5 and 57.3 mm (p=0.23), and the proximal neck lengths were 16.8 and 17.4 mm (p = 0.65), respectively. The anatomical characteristics appeared to be similar in both groups. The technical success rate in both groups was 100%. Three cases in the S group had MAEs, including two stroke and one brachial artery pseudoaneurysm; whereas, 2 cases had MAEs in the A group, including one stroke and one paraplegia. There was no 30-day mortality or retrograde type A dissection in both groups. The mean observation periods in the S and A groups were 46 (1–123) and 35 (1–73) months, respectively. At 36 and 60 months post-procedure, the freedom from ARD was 97.6% and 97.6% in the S group, 100.0% and 100.0% in the A group (p=0.39); and the freedom from re-intervention for type1a endoleaks was 79.2% and 65.2% in the S group, 100.0% and 100.0% in the A group (p = 0.0087 < 0.05). A statistically significant reduction in re-intervention for type1a endoleaks was observed in the A group. ConclusionsProximal fixation augmentation using the Najuta fenestrated stent graft during TEVAR for distal arch aneurysm is effective in preventing the postoperative late type 1a endoleaks.

Endovascular Treatment versus Open Surgical Repair for Isolated Iliac Artery Aneurysms.

Endovascular treatment (EVT) has been shown to be effective and safe for isolated iliac artery aneurysms (IAAs). However, concerns remain regarding the lack of consideration to recent advances in perioperative care and surgical techniques, as well as a significant number of re-interventions with EVT. This study compares the outcomes of open surgical repair (OSR) and EVT using recent clinical data. This retrospective, single-center study included patients who underwent OSR or EVT for isolated degenerative IAAs between January 2007 and December 2018. Primary outcomes were procedure time, number of transfusions during admission, length of hospital stay, complications, and number of preserved internal iliac arteries. Secondary outcomes included all-cause and aneurysm-related mortality, and re-intervention rates. Fifty-eight consecutive patients underwent treatment for isolated IAAs (25 underwent OSR and 33 underwent EVT), with a median follow-up of 75 months (range: 39-133 months). Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups, except for a lower mean age in the OSR group than in the EVT group (66.0±8.2 vs. 73.1±8.6, P=0.003). Both groups had a mild risk of comorbidity severity score. Early complications (within 30 days of the procedure) occurred more frequently in the OSR group, though not statistically significant (24.0% vs. 6.1%, P=0.07). Late complications, including sac expansion and thrombotic occlusion, were significantly more common in the EVT group (15.2% vs. 0%, P=0.04). Re-intervention rate was higher in the EVT group but not statistically significant (9.1% vs. 4.0%, P=0.44). No significant differences were observed in major adverse cardiovascular events and mortality between the groups (P=0.66 and P=0.27), and there were no aneurysm-related deaths. For patients with mild risk factors, EVT does not offer a survival or re-intervention advantages over OSR in the treatment of isolated IAAs. However, EVT is associated with an increased risk of late complications. Although larger randomized studies are necessary, OSR may be considered the first-line treatment for isolated IAAs in younger and mild-risk patients.

Endovascular Treatment of Aortoiliac Aneurysms With the Bell-Bottom Technique: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Aneurysmal degeneration of the common iliac artery (CIA) can pose a challenge to achieve distal landing zone sealing at the time of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). The aim of this study was to summarize the current literature regarding the bell-bottom technique (BBT) for ectatic CIAs during EVAR. This study was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Eligible articles were identified through a comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central published until April 2023. A meta-analysis was conducted using the random effects model and the I2 statistic was used to assess for heterogeneity. The primary endpoints were type Ib/III endoleak, graft occlusion/limb embolization, and reintervention rate. Secondary endpoints included perioperative adverse events and mortality. Overall, twenty-six studies and 4332 patients with flared limbs were included. The pooled estimate for type Ib/III endoleak was 4% (95% CI: 2-6, I2 = 85.6%), for reintervention rate was 9% (95% CI: 6-12, I2 = 90.4%), and for overall mortality was 10% (95% CI: 4-19, I2 = 97.3%). No aneurysm related deaths were recorded. Comparative analysis showed similar type Ib/III endoleak, graft occlusion, and reintervention rates between the EVAR BBT, iliac branch endoprosthesis (IBE), and embolization of the internal iliac artery followed by extension of the iliac limb to the external iliac artery (EIE) groups. The use of flared limbs could be considered a reasonable first line choice for EVAR cases with CIA ectasia as it is simpler, allows for future IBE or EIE and does not increase the risk for type Ib/III endoleak or graft occlusion. Further comparative studies with longer follow-up are needed.

Outcomes of fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair with an inverted contralateral limb

ObjectiveTo report technical success and evaluate clinical outcomes of fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair (F/B-EVAR) incorporating a contralateral inverted limb. MethodsPatients who underwent F/B-EVAR with a custom-made bifurcated device containing an inverted limb between January 2010 and September 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Time-to-event data were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. ResultsA total of 32 patients (26 men; mean age 77±6.2 years) were included in the analysis. Technical success was achieved in 28 patients (87.5%). Two technical failures resulted from misplaced contralateral limbs in patients with previous endovascular aortic repair (EVAR), necessitating one open conversion due to a type 3b endoleak, and one femoro-femoral crossover bypass after occlusion of a misplaced contralateral limb. Additionally, two technical failures were attributed to a type 3c endoleak and a type 1c endoleak, originating from a fenestrated device at the level of the left and right renal artery, respectively. One patient (3.1%) died <30 days post-operatively due to a subdural hemorrhage. Estimated patient survival after 1 and 2 years was 92.7%±5.1%, and 74.3%±10.1%, respectively. No aneurysm-related deaths were observed. During the median follow-up of 13 months, one (3.1%) inverted limb occluded, in addition to the occlusion resulting from a misplaced contralateral limb, and was treated with a femoro-femoral crossover bypass. One target vessel (right renal artery) occluded (0.9%), resulting in a permanent, significantly reduced renal function. Freedom from overall reintervention after 1 and 2 years was 73.5%±8.0% and 68.3%±9.0%, respectively. An additional four patients (12.5%) presented with a type 3c endoleak during follow-up scans, three of which originated from fenestrations at the level of the renal stents. There were no junctional problems between the inverted limb device and the main endograft, and no significant correlation was found between the one-sealing-stent inverted limb device design and the onset of type 3 endoleak (log-rank p=.064). ConclusionF/B-EVAR incorporating an inverted limb can be a viable endovascular option to manage complex aneurysms with a short renal artery to bifurcation distance. However, using the inverted limb presents a notable technical challenge and could be associated with a higher need for reintervention. Carefully confirming correct cannulation of the inverted limb is warranted.

Early results from the pivotal trial substudy of the GORE EXCLUDER conformable endoprosthesis in angulated necks

ObjectiveTo report the investigational device exemption study 1-year clinical outcomes of the high neck angulation (HNA) substudy of the GORE EXCLUDER Conformable AAA Endoprosthesis (EXCC) for treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). MethodsThis study is a prospective, multicenter clinical trial conducted in the United States and included core laboratory assessment of imaging and independent event adjudication. Anatomical criteria for enrollment in the HNA substudy included infrarenal aortic neck angulation >60° and ≤90° with aortic neck length ≥10 mm. Primary safety end points included estimated blood loss of >1000 mL, death, stroke, myocardial infarction, bowel ischemia, paraplegia, respiratory failure, renal failure, and thromboembolic events. Primary effectiveness end points included technical success, absence from type I and III endoleaks, migration (≥10 mm), sac enlargement (≥5 mm), sac rupture, and conversion to open repair. ResultsBetween January 2018 and February 2022, 95 patients were enrolled in the HNA substudy across 35 sites. Of the 95 patients, 71 (74.7%) were male and the cohort average age was 74.4 years. The mean infrarenal proximal aortic neck angle was 71.6° and the mean AAA size was 62.9 mm. Overall technical success was achieved in 93 patients (97.9%). Freedom from a primary safety end point through 30 days was 96.7%; 3 (3.3%) patients had an estimated blood loss of >1000 mL. Freedom from the primary effectiveness at 12 months was achieved in 94.8%. Four patients (4.3%) had a type IA endoleak; intervention after the procedure was not required and no subsequent interventions or sac enlargement were noted in these patients. At 12 months, 29 patients (39.7%) experienced a type II endoleak and 1 (1.3%) patient experienced AAA sac expansion of ≥5 mm. Through 12 months, 1 patient (1.3%) had a conversion to open surgical repair. There were no aneurysm-related deaths, ruptures, or migration through 12 months. ConclusionsThe investigational device exemption study demonstrates safety and effectiveness of the GORE EXCLUDER Conformable AAA Endoprosthesis device in AAA with highly angulated necks (>60° and ≤90°) are preserved at the 12-month follow-up.

Outcomes of endovascular intervention for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm with hostile necks

Overview: Currently, endovascular intervention of the abdominal aortic aneurysm is considered the standard treatment method. Aneurysm neck’s morphology can affect 60% of the success or failure of endovascular intervention. Many advanced techniques to treat hostile necks have gradually become popular. However, endovascular intervention of the abdominal aortic aneurysms with hostile aneurysm necks are still considered a challenge. Objectives: Describe the characteristics of patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms with hostile necks. Evaluate the perioperative and mid-term outcomes of endovascular intervention to treat infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms with hostile necks. Methods: The patients were diagnosed with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms at the Vascular Surgery Department of Cho Ray Hospital, and were treated by endovascular intervention, from January 2020 to August 2023, and met the including criteria. Results: The technical success rate was 95.12%. The early death rate was 2.44%. There were no aneurysm-related deaths. Early endoleak rate was low at 4.88%. Late type I endoleak was 7.5%. The mid-term mortality rate was 9.76%. The mid-term mortality rate recorded in the aneurysm necks length ≤ 15mm group was significantly higher than the other group. Late type I endoleak had no significant difference, when comparing the short neck groups and the angulated neck groups. Conclusion: Endovascular intervention to treat infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms with hostile necks is a safe and effective method.

Treatment strategy for splenic artery aneurysms and novel classification based on imaging

ObjectiveThe incidence of splenic artery aneurysms (SAAs) has increased with advances in imaging techniques, necessitating a comprehensive classification to guide treatment strategies. This study aims to propose a novel classification system for SAAs based on aneurysm characteristics and to review treatment outcomes at our center. MethodsThis retrospective study included 113 patients with SAAs admitted to Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 2019 to December 2023, assessed using computed tomography angiography or digital subtraction angiography. A new classification system was devised based on the aneurysm location, morphology, integrity, and parent artery anatomy. Treatment strategies were determined based on these characteristics, with interventions ranging from endovascular therapy to laparoscopic and open surgery. Patients were followed up after the intervention to assess mortality, complications, reinterventions, and aneurysm-related outcomes. ResultsThe study cohort of 113 patients with 127 SAAs had a predominance of female patients (63.7%) and a mean age of 52.7 years. The SAAs were classified into five types, with type I being the most common. The intervention techniques varied across types, with sac embolization, covered stent implantation, and artery embolization being the most frequently used. The overall technical success rate was 94.7%, with perioperative complication and reintervention rates of 25.0% and 0.9%, respectively, and no deaths within 30 days after the intervention. The median follow-up duration was 21 months, with overall complications rate of 3.5% and no aneurysm-related complications or deaths. ConclusionsThe proposed classification system effectively guides the selection of treatment strategies for SAAs, incorporating key anatomical and morphological features. This system facilitated high technical success and low complication rates, underscoring the importance of tailored techniques in managing SAAs.

Use of Artificial Intelligence With Deep Learning Approaches for the Follow-up of Infrarenal Endovascular Aortic Repair.

Endoleaks represent one of the main complications after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) and can lead to increased re-intervention rates and secondary rupture. Serial lifelong surveillance is required and traditionally involves cross-sectional imaging with manual axial measurements. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based imaging analysis has been developed and may provide a more precise and faster assessment. This study aims to evaluate the ability of an AI-based software to assess post-EVAR morphological changes over time, detect endoleaks, and associate them with EVAR-related adverse events. Patients who underwent EVAR at a tertiary hospital from January 2017 to March 2020 with at least 2 follow-up computed tomography angiography (CTA) were analyzed using PRAEVAorta 2 (Nurea). The software was compared to the ground truth provided by human experts using Sensitivity (Se), Specificity (Sp), Negative Predictive Value (NPV), and Positive Predictive Value (PPV). Endovascular aortic repair-related adverse events were defined as aneurysm-related death, rupture, endoleak, limb occlusion, and EVAR-related re-interventions. Fifty-six patients were included with a median imaging follow-up of 27 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 20-40). There were no significant differences overtime in the evolution of maximum aneurysm diameters (55.62 mm [IQR: 52.33-59.25] vs 54.34 mm [IQR: 46.13-59.47]; p=0.2162) or volumes (130.4 cm3 [IQR: 113.8-171.7] vs 125.4 cm3 [IQR: 96.3-169.1]; p=0.1131) despite a -13.47% decrease in the volume of thrombus (p=0.0216). PRAEVAorta achieved a Se of 89.47% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 80.58 to 94.57), a Sp of 91.25% (95% CI: 83.02 to 95.70), a PPV of 90.67% (95% CI: 81.97 to 95.41), and an NPV of 90.12% (95% CI: 81.70 to 94.91) in detecting endoleaks. Endovascular aortic repair-related adverse events were associated with global volume modifications with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.7806 vs 0.7277 for maximum diameter. The same trend was observed for endoleaks (AUC of 0.7086 vs 0.6711). The AI-based software PRAEVAorta enabled a detailed anatomic characterization of aortic remodeling post-EVAR and showed its potential interest for automatic detection of endoleaks during follow-up. The association of aortic aneurysmal volume with EVAR-related adverse events and endoleaks was more robust compared with maximum diameter. The integration of PRAEVAorta AI software into clinical practice promises a transformative shift in post-EVAR surveillance. By offering precise and rapid detection of endoleaks and comprehensive anatomic assessments, clinicians can expect enhanced diagnostic accuracy and streamlined patient management. This innovation reduces reliance on manual measurements, potentially reducing interpretation errors and shortening evaluation times. Ultimately, PRAEVAorta's capabilities hold the potential to optimize patient care, leading to more timely interventions and improved outcomes in endovascular aortic repair.

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Accessory Renal Artery Exclusion during Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

Accessory renal arteries (ARAs) frequently coexist with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) and can influence treatment. This study aimed to retrospectively analyze the ARA's exclusion effect on patients undergoing standard endovascular aneurysm repair for AAA. The study focused on medium- and long-term outcomes, including type II endoleak, aneurysmal sac changes, mortality, reoperation rates, renal function, and infarction post-operatively. 76 patients treated with EVAR for AAA were included. One hundred and two ARAs were identified: 69 originated from the neck, 30 from the sac, and 3 from the iliac arteries. The ARA treatment was embolization in 15 patients and coverage in 72. Technical success was 100%. One-month post-operative computed tomography angiography (CTA) revealed that 76 ARAs (74.51%) were excluded. Thirty-day complications included renal deterioration in 7 patients (9.21%) and a blood pressure increase in 15 (19.73%). During follow-up, 16 patients (21.05%) died, with three aneurysm-related deaths (3.94%). ARA-related type II endoleak (T2EL) was significantly associated with the ARA's origin in the aneurysmatic sac. Despite reinterventions were not significantly linked to any factor, post-operative renal infarction was correlated with an ARA diameter greater than 3 mm and ARA embolization. ARAs can influence EVAR outcomes, with anatomical and procedural factors associated with T2EL and renal infarction. Further studies are needed to optimize the management of ARAs during EVAR.

Midterm outcomes of endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm using the cuff-first technique to prevent type II endoleaks

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the initial and midterm outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) using the cuff-first technique (CFT) to prevent type II endoleak (T2EL). MethodsCFT involves deploying an aortic cuff inside the AAA to cover the ostium of the aortic side branch vessels before deploying the main body. We performed a retrospective review of all patients undergoing EVAR with CFT or side branch embolization (SBE) for AAAs at The Jikei University Hospital between 2016 and 2022. Primary endpoint was the rate of aneurysm sac shrinkage. Secondary endpoints were procedure time, radiation exposure, technical and clinical success rates, occurrence of T2EL, and freedom from reintervention or aneurysm-related death. ResultsOf 406 patients who underwent EVAR for AAAs, CFT was utilized in 56 (CFT group) and SBE in 35 (SBE group); all 91 patients were included in this study. There were no differences in patient demographics between groups, but there were differences in patency rate of the inferior mesenteric artery and absent intraluminal thrombus. The technical success rate per target vessel in the CFT and SBE group was 97.8% and 91.8%, and the clinical success rate was 91.0% and 100%, respectively. The median procedure time was shorter for CFT than for SBE: CFT, 10 (interquartile range [IQR], 6-14) minutes vs SBE, 25 (IQR, 18.5-45) minutes; P < .05), and median radiation exposure was lower for CFT than for SBE (CFT, 1455 (IQR, 840-2634) mGy vs SBE, 2353 (IQR, 1552-3586) mGy; P < .05). During the median follow-up of 25 months (IQR, 12.5-47 months), sac shrinkage occurred at similar rates in both groups (CFT, 37.5% vs SBE, 40.0%; P = .812), and there were no differences in freedom from reintervention (CFT, 96.2% and 91.4% at 12 and 36 months vs SBE, 100% and 89.5% at 12 and 36 months; log-rank P = .761) and freedom from aneurysm-related death (100% at 36 months in both groups; log-rank P = .440). The odds ratio of CFT vs SBE for sac regression was calculated by adjusting for inferior mesenteric artery patency and absent intraluminal thrombus, resulting in no statistical significance (odds ratio, 1.231; 95% confidence interval, 0.486-3.122). ConclusionsCFT is feasible with a shorter procedure time and lower radiation exposure than SBE and comparable mid-term outcomes, including sac shrinkage rate, compared with SBE. We believe that CFT, if anatomically suitable, is an alternative to SBE for the prevention of T2EL during EVAR.

Ten-year single-center outcomes following endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm using the INCRAFT device

ObjectiveThis study aimed to report the long-term outcomes beyond 10 years of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysms using the low-profile INCRAFT device. MethodsThis was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of all patients undergoing EVAR using the INCRAFT device as part of the regulatory trial between 2012 and 2013. Primary endpoint was aneurysm-related death. Secondary endpoints were all-cause death, reintervention, late open conversion, and aneurysm status (shrinkage, stable, and growth). ResultsThirty patients with a mean age of 71.8 ± 7.7 years were included in this study. The median aneurysm diameter at EVAR was 54.5 mm (interquartile range, 53-56.8 mm). All abdominal aortic aneurysms in this study were treated following the device’s instructions for use. At index EVAR, the INCRAFT device was successfully implanted in all patients using a percutaneous approach under local anesthesia. No patients experienced major adverse events or procedure-related complications 30 days after EVAR. During the median follow-up of 125 months (interquartile range, 98-131 months) with follow-up rates of 100% at 5 years and 96.7% at 10 years, aneurysm-related mortality was 0%, and freedom from all-cause mortality was 82.9% at 5 years and 75.3% at 10 years. Reintervention was required in 10 patients with 15 procedures. Sac growth was observed in 11 patients (36.7%), six of whom eventually required late open conversion; five of these patients underwent open aneurysmorrhaphy with stent graft preservation, and one underwent open surgical repair with endograft explantation. Late rupture was identified in one case, where type Ia endoleak led to rupture at 69 months, and open repair was successfully performed. Freedom from reintervention was 89.0% at 5 years but declined to 60.9% at 10 years; freedom from late open conversion was 100% at 5 years but declined to 70.8% at 10 years. ConclusionsLong-term outcomes of the INCRAFT stent graft showed no aneurysm-related deaths. However, sac growth occurred persistently throughout the follow-up period, resulting in a relatively high rate of reinterventions in the later periods, which highlights the importance of lifelong postoperative surveillance and appropriate reinterventions when indicated.

Pre-emptive Aortic Side Branch Embolization during Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Using the Excluder Stent-Graft System: A Prospective Multicenter study

PurposeTo evaluate the effectiveness and safety of pre-emptive transcatheter arterial embolization (P-TAE) for aortic side branches (ASBs) to prevent Type 2 endoleaks (EL2) before endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) using the Excluder stent-graft system (Excluder). Materials and MethodsIn this prospective, multicenter study, 80 patients (mean age, 79.1 years [SD ± 6.7]; 85.0% were men; mean aneurysmal sac diameter, 48.4 mm [SD ± 7.4]) meeting the eligibility criteria were prospectively enrolled from 9 hospitals. Before EVAR, P-TAE was performed to embolize the patent ASBs originating from the abdominal aortic aneurysm. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) was performed at 1 month and 6 months after EVAR. The primary endpoint was EL2 incidence at 6 months, and the secondary endpoints were aneurysmal sac diameter changes at 6 and 12 months, P-TAE outcomes, adverse events related to P-TAE, reintervention, and aneurysm-related mortality. ResultsAll patients successfully underwent P-TAE without serious. Coil embolization was successful in 81.6% of ASBs. EL2 incidence at 6 months was identified in 18 of 70 (25.7%) patients. Aneurysmal sac diameter shrinkage (≥5 mm) was observed in 30.0% of patients at 6 months and in 40.9% at 12 months. Only 1 patient required reintervention for EL2 within 1 year of EVAR; aneurysm-related deaths were not observed. ConclusionsP-TAE for ASBs before EVAR using Excluder is a safe and effective strategy. It aids in achieving early aneurysmal sac shrinkage and reduces EL2 reintervention at 1 year after EVAR.

The Challenge of Treating Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms with Hostile Neck Anatomy: An Overview.

Hostile aortic neck anatomy challenges the outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). Besides reverting to open surgical repair (OSR), thoughtful endograft selection and a number of advanced endovascular techniques have been suggested as potential solutions for preventing proximal seal zone complications, improving EVAR durability, and preventing aneurysm-related death. Each technique is associated with advantages and limitations and there has not been a credible direct comparison amongst them in the form of a well-designed prospective trial. The not infrequent presence of multiple hostile anatomic characteristics further complicates decision making and challenges the surgeon's skills. This paper serves as an overview of hostile neck anatomy and its implications on EVAR. We provide a concise literature review with the purpose of outlining the treatment modalities and outcomes in this patient population.

Outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair using fenestrated stent grafts in patients with thoracic aortic distal arch aneurysms.

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for aortic arch aneurysms is challenging because of anatomical restrictions and the presence of cervical branches. Revascularization of the cervical branch is required when conventional commercial stent grafts are used. TEVAR using fenestrated stent grafts (FSG) often does not require additional procedures to revascularize cervical branches. This study aimed to evaluate the features and initial and midterm outcomes of TEVAR using fenestrated stent grafts. From April 2007 to December 2016, 101 consecutive patients underwent TEVAR using fenestrated stent grafts for distal aortic arch aneurysms at a single centre. Technical success, complications, freedom from aneurysm-related death, secondary intervention and aneurysm progression were retrospectively investigated. All the patients underwent TEVAR using fenestrated stent grafts. The 30-day mortality rate was zero. Cerebral infarction, access route problems and spinal cord injury occurred in 4, 3 and 2 patients, respectively. Each type of endoleak was observed in 38 of the 101 patients during the course of the study; 20/38 patients had minor type 1 endoleaks at the time of discharge. The endoleak disappeared in 2 patients and showed no significant change in 8 patients; however, the aneurysm expanded over time in 10 patients. Additional treatment was performed in 8 of the 10 patients with type 1 endoleaks and dilatation of the aneurysm. The rate of freedom from aneurysm-related death during the observation period was 98%. TEVAR with FSG is a simple procedure, with few complications. Additional treatment has been observed to reduce aneurysm-related deaths, even in patients with endoleaks and enlarged aneurysms. Based on this study, the outcomes of endovascular repair of aortic arch aneurysms using a fenestrated stent graft seem acceptable.

Changes in global mortality from aortic aneurysm

ObjectiveGlobally, there has been a marked increase in aortic aneurysm-related deaths between 1990 and 2019. We sought to understand the underlying etiologies for this mortality trend by examining secular changes in both demographics and the prevalence of risk factors, and how these changes may vary across sociodemographic index (SDI) regions. MethodsWe queried the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD) for aortic aneurysm deaths from 1990 to 2019 overall and by age group. We identified the percentage of aortic aneurysm deaths attributable to each risk factor identified by GBD modeling (smoking, hypertension, lead exposure, and high sodium diet) and their respective changes over time. We then analyzed aneurysm mortality by SDI region. ResultsThe number of aortic aneurysm-related deaths have increased from 94,968 in 1990 to 172,427 in 2019, signifying an 81.6% increase, which greatly exceeds the 18.2% increase in all-cause mortality observed over the same time interval. Examination of age-specific mortality demonstrated that the number of aortic aneurysm deaths markedly correlated with advancing age. However, when considering rate of death rather than mortality count, overall age-standardized death rates decreased 18% from 2.72 per 100,000 in 1990 to 2.21 per 100,000 in 2019. Analysis of the specific risk factors associated with aneurysm death revealed that the percentage of deaths attributable to smoking decreased from 45.6% in 1990 to 34.6% in 2019, and deaths attributable to hypertension decreased from 38.7% to 34.7%. Globally, hypertension surpassed smoking as the leading risk factor. The reported rate of death was consistently greater as SDI increased, and this effect was most pronounced among low-middle and middle SDI regions (173.2% and 170.4%, respectively). ConclusionsDespite an overall increase in the number of aneurysm deaths, there was a decrease in the age-standardized death rate, demonstrating that the observed increased number of aortic aneurysm deaths between 1990 and 2019 was primarily driven by an overall increase in the age of the global population. Fortunately, it appears that the increase in overall aneurysm-related deaths has been modulated by improved risk factor modification, in particular smoking. Given the rise in aneurysm-related deaths, global expansion of vascular specialty capabilities is warranted and will serve to amplify improvements in population-based aneurysm health achieved with risk factor control.

Endovascular Repair of Juxtarenal and Pararenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Using a Novel Low-Profile Fenestrated Custom-Made Endograft: Technical Details and Short-Term Outcomes.

The aim of this study is to share preliminary experiences and outcomes with a novel custom-made fenestrated TREO® Abdominal Stent-Graft System to treat juxtarenal and pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Juxtarenal and pararenal AAA patients treated with the custom-made fenestrated TREO® Abdominal Stent-Graft System were included from 4 high-volume European academic medical centers from June 2021 to September 2023. Technical success and 30-day/in-hospital mortality and complications were analyzed. Technical success was defined as successful endovascular implantation of the stent graft with preservation of antegrade flow to the target vessels, and absence of type 1 or 2 endoleak (EL) at the first postoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA). Forty-two consecutive patients were included. The majority of the devices were constructed with 2 (N=4; 9.5%), 3 (N=9; 21.4%), or 4 (N=27; 64%) fenestrations. In 1 case, the device was constructed with a single fenestration (2.4%) and 1 device contained 5 fenestrations (2.4%); 17% had previous AAA repair. Target vessel cannulation with placement of a bridging stent was successful in all but 1 vessel (99, 3%). One aneurysm-related death occurred in the direct postoperative period and 2 limb occlusions necessitated reintervention during admission. In the median follow-up period of 101 (2-620) days, 3 more patients died due to non-aneurysm-related causes. Technical success was achieved in 90% of the cases. Nineteen ELs were seen on the first postoperative CT scan: 1 type 1b EL (N=1; 2%), 15 type 2 ELs (N=15; 36%), and 3 type 3 ELs (N=3%). Eleven patients received more than 1 CT scan during a median follow-up of 361 days (82-620): 3 type 2 ELs resolved and 1 type 3 EL was treated in this period. In the follow-up, 1 patient had a coagulation disorder that caused occlusions of the branches. The results of the first experiences using the custom-made fenestrated TREO® Abdominal Stent-Graft System in Europe are promising. There was a low short-term mortality and morbidity rate in these patients of which 17% had previous AAA repair. Mid-term and long-term follow-up data are needed to evaluate endograft durability and performance. This study shows the first experiences and short-term results of a novel low-profile custom-made device: the custom-made fenestrated TREO® Abdominal Stent-Graft System. Showing these results and experiences can help the physicians in clinical decision-making for their patients.

Endovascular Strategies and Outcomes for Aberrant Splenic Artery Aneurysms.

Aberrant splenic artery aneurysms (ASAAs) located at the splenomesenteric trunk (SMT) and the celiacomesenteric trunk have a close anatomical relationship with the superior mesenteric artery (SMA). The aim of this study was to review our institutional experience of endovascular treatment for ASAAs and evaluate the long-term outcomes. A retrospective review of patients with ASAAs who underwent endovascular treatment between December 2006 and December 2022 was performed. The demographics of the patients, aneurysm characteristics, treatment strategies, perioperative and long-term outcomes, and complications were analyzed. A total of 29 patients with ASAAs were endovascularly treated at our institution. The SMT variant occurred in the majority of the patients. All ASAAs were characterized by eccentric growth and extremely short inflow arteries. Only 1 patient's inflow artery of the aneurysm exceeded 1 cm in length. Thirteen patients were treated by coil embolization alone. Four patients received bare stent-assisted coil embolization. A combination of coil embolization and covered stent placement across the orifice of the aberrant splenic artery was performed in the remaining 12 cases. Coil migration into the SMA occurred in 2 patients during the operation. Technical success was achieved in all patients. With a median duration of 63 (34-101) months of follow-up, no intestinal ischemia, aneurysm-related death, aneurysm rupture, or sac enlargement occurred. Three cases of aneurysm sac reperfusion were observed, and 1 patient underwent reintervention with secondary embolization. Asymptomatic occlusion of the covered stent was detected in 1 patient at 2 years. Endovascular treatment is a safe, effective, and durable option for ASAAs. Inflow embolization might be difficult to achieve in ASAAs and poses a high risk of coil migration into the SMA. Long-term observation indicates that reasonable use of the covered stent could achieve reliable inflow artery exclusion in ASAAs without intestinal complications. Aberrant splenic artery aneurysm (ASAA) is an extremely rare entity. This study reported a large sample size of ASAAs treated by endovascular techniques with long-term follow-up. The ASAA was characterized by an extremely short inflow artery and a close anatomical relationship with the superior mesenteric artery (SMA). Endovascular treatment is a safe, effective, and durable option for ASAAs. Inflow embolization might be difficult to achieve in ASAAs and pose a high risk of coil migration into the SMA. Long-term observation indicates that reasonable use of the covered stent could achieve reliable inflow artery exclusion in ASAAs without intestinal complications.

Use of EndoAnchors during index endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in patients with hostile proximal aortic neck anatomy.

Standard endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is sometimes the only treatment option for patients with hostile aortic neck anatomy, but it carries an increased risk of both early and late procedure-related complications. The aim of this study was to report on single-center experience with the Heli-FX EndoAnchors (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA) as an adjunctive procedure to endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for prevention and perioperative treatment of proximal neck complications in patients with hostile neck anatomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Asingle-centre, retrospective study evaluating 24 consecutive patients treated with EndoAnchors during the index EVAR procedure between November 2018 and August 2021. EndoAnchor implantation was indicated for cases with hostile proximal aortic neck anatomy characterised by the presence of at least one of the following parameters: length of 28 mm, angle of >60°, circumferential thrombus/calcification involving ≥50%, and reverse taper. Median follow-up period was 22.5 months (IQR 2-31.5 months) with no aneurysm-related death, rupture, or conversion to open surgical repair during the follow-up. The procedural success rate was 100%, with no type Ia endoleak at the completion angiography. Amean of 7 EndoAnchors was used per patient (range 4-12). There were no EndoAnchor fractures and dislocations or stent graft fabric damage due to anchor implants.Twenty-three patients (95.8%) remained free of type Ia endoleak and migration on follow-up imaging. Aneurysm sac regression was observed in 13 patients (54.1%), while in 8 patients (33.3%) the sac remained stable. Sac enlargement was present in 1 patient (4.2%) due to late type Ia endoleak. Twopatients were lost to the follow-up immediately after the procedure.Between two groups of patients (sac regression versus failure to regress), the larger initial diameter of the proximal neck was the only significant independent factor associated with a lower possibility of sac regression (p= 0,021). The use of EndoAnchors during the index EVAR procedure in cases with challenging aortic neck anatomy with or without perioperative type Ia endoleak was associated with good midterm results and led to sac regression in most of the patients (Tab. 4, Fig. 3, Ref. 31).

Low-profile versus standard-profile stent grafts in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a case-matched study.

Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) is nowadays a widespread method of managing abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Low-profile stent grafts (LPSGs) enable treatment of patients with complex and anatomically challenging aneurysms, and facilitate a percutaneous and thus less invasive procedure. To assess the outcomes of EVAR with low-profile versus standard-profile stent grafts (SPSGs). Thirty-one patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) were treated by endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) using LPSGs. The control group of patients treated with SPSGs was matched with MedCalc software. The clinical records and the preoperative and follow-up computed tomography angiography of patients who underwent endovascular treatment of AAA were included in this study. Patients in the LPSG group had significantly more often low access vessel diameter (< 6 mm) compared to the SPSG group (38.7% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.003). In 1-year follow-up, there was no rupture, no infection, no conversion to open repair and no aneurysm-related death. Five secondary interventions were necessary in the SPSG group and only 1 in the LPSG group (p = 0.09). Type of stent graft was not a risk factor of perioperative complications, presence of endoleak or reintervention (p > 0.05). Risk factors for perioperative complications were COPD and conical neck (OR = 6.3, 95% CI: 1.5-25, p = 0.01 and OR = 6.2, 95% CI: 1-39.76, p = 0.04). The risk factor for endoleak was lower maximal aneurysm diameter. The risk factor for reintervention was proximal neck diameter (OR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.-0.97, p = 0.03). Our study showed that use of LPSGs is a safe and viable method for patients with narrow access vessels who are not eligible for standard-profile systems.