Anesthesia-related Adverse Events Research Articles

Comparison of the Incidences of Anesthesia-Related Adverse Events in Patients Undergoing Surgery in the Daytime, Care Transition, and After-Hours Period

Background: The timing of surgery might affect anesthesia-related adverse events due to limited personnels, inadequate supervision, and/or lack of equipment, especially after-hours period. Objective: To compare the incidence of adverse anesthesia events in patients undergoing surgery in different periods of the day. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed in adult patients who undergone surgery under anesthesia at Siriraj Hospital in 2020. Patients were randomly selected and categorized into three groups according to the time of anesthesia, Group 1, daytime anesthesia group (8 a.m. to 4 p.m.), Group 2, anesthesia with care transition between the daytime and after-hours period, and Group 3, after-hours anesthesia group (4 p.m. to 8 a.m.). The patients’ demographic data, surgical-related, anesthesia data, and anesthesia-related adverse events were reviewed from the hospital electronic medical records. Analysis was performed to compare the incidence and determine the risk factors associated with adverse anesthesia events. Results: One thousand two hundred patients were included in the present study with 600, 400, and 200 patients in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The overall incidence of adverse anesthesia events was 5.3% with 6.7%, 3.5%, and 5.0% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p=0.090). The most common adverse anesthesia event was difficult intubation at 1.5%. The factor found to be significantly associated with anesthesia-related adverse events was the non-operating room anesthesia (OR 5.97, 95% CI 2.94 to 12.13, p<0.001). Conclusion: The present study was unable to demonstrate a significant difference in the incidences of anesthesia-related adverse events among the various anesthesia periods.

The impact of diurnal variations on emergence delirium following general anesthesia and surgery in children.

Emergence delirium (ED) is a widely recognized issue that prolongs mechanical ventilation and post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) resuscitation time, consequently increasing hospital costs and mortality. Postoperative disturbance in circadian rhythms, commonly leading to sleep disorders, has been identified as a significant risk factor for ED. However, the influence of surgery timing (morning vs. afternoon) on the incidence of ED in pediatric patients undergoing general anesthesia remains unknown. Patients aged 2-6 years who were operated on under general anesthesia with a bispectral index value between 50 and 60 were categorized based on anesthesia start time into either the morning surgery group (Group M, 8:00-12:00) or the afternoon surgery group (Group A, 13:00-17:00). The primary outcome was the post-extubation incidence of ED assessed by the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium (CAPD) score. Secondary outcomes included extubation time, duration of PACU stay, and adverse postoperative events and complications. We recruited a total of 560 patients, 280 in group M and 280 in group A. Compared to Group M, Group A exhibited a significantly higher incidence of ED (p < 0.001), elevated CAPD scores (p < 0.001), and prolonged PACU stays (p < 0.001). Notably, there was no significant difference in extubation time and anesthesia-related adverse events or other postoperative complications between the groups. Our study highlights that the time of surgery significantly affects the incidence of ED, CAPD scores, and PACU stay duration in children. Further validation of these findings may guide future strategies to reduce ED.

Spinal anesthesia for endoscopic submucosal dissection of large recto-sigmoid lesions: a feasibility study

Background and study aims: Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is often challenging and time-consuming. Prolonged sedation and general anesthesia are associated with a relevant risk of anesthesia-related adverse events (ARAEs), especially in elderly and difficult airway patients. Spinal anesthesia (SA), a simple technique providing analgesia and motor block without systemic drug administration, has never been described in gastrointestinal endoscopy. We assessed the feasibility of SA in colorectal lesion ESD. Patients and methods: We retrospectively collected data on all consecutive patients who underwent ESD for colorectal laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) under SA in our Center during the last three years. We evaluated the rates of technical success, i.e. ESD completion under SA without need of conversion to deep sedation or general anesthesia, and ARAEs after SA. Results: ESD under SA was performed on 20 recto-sigmoid LSTs ≥35 mm. Technical success was achieved in 95.0% (19/20) of cases, while one patient (5.0%) required conversion to deep sedation. Two patients (10.0%) experienced acute urinary retention that was successfully treated with temporary catheterization. Conclusions: Our initial experience suggests that SA for ESD of large recto-sigmoid LSTs is feasible, and it may prove to be a valuable option especially for elderly and frail patients.

Anesthesia-Specific Software Module for Voluntary Adverse Event Reporting

Objectives Hospital staff are expected to report adverse events to safety leaders and risk managers. At our institution, staff report adverse events via an incident reporting software system, known as “RL.” These “RL reports” are kept separate from patient medical records. Within the Anesthesiology Department, we noted low numbers of RL reports relative to known adverse events. Anesthesiology-related events were scattered within the RL software and therefore difficult to find. We hypothesized that compiling these events in one location would increase reporting rates and allow for deeper analysis of filed adverse events. Methods We created an Anesthesia-specific RL software module, which included all anesthesia-related adverse events in one location. Additionally, we tracked the impact on RL reporting of two other quality improvement initiatives, including an intradepartmental quality assurance form, implemented during the study period. Results The Anesthesia RL software module led to a 3.2-fold increase (P &lt; 0.001) in the monthly average of filed RL reports. The increase was even greater (11.1-fold, P &lt; 0.001) when excluding the most prevalent category of RL reports (Controlled Substance Discrepancies). The intradepartmental quality assurance form had minimal impact on filed RL reports. “Controlled Substance Discrepancies,” “Other,” and “Equipment issue” were the most common event types. Most events were classified as constituting no harm to the patient. Conclusions Creating a specialty-specific RL software module led to increased RL reports, even when accounting for other implemented quality improvement initiatives, and allowed for deeper analysis of the filed reports. Our findings may be replicated for other specialties.

Validation of a natural language processing algorithm using national reporting data to improve identification of anesthesia-related ADVerse evENTs: The “ADVENTURE” study

BackgroundReporting and analysis of adverse events (AE) is associated with improved health system learning, quality outcomes, and patient safety. Manual text analysis is time-consuming, costly, and prone to human errors. We aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of novel machine learning and natural language processing (NLP) approaches for early predictions of adverse events and provide input to direct quality improvement and patient safety initiatives. MethodsWe used machine learning to analyze 9559 continuously reported AE by clinicians and healthcare systems to the French National Health accreditor (HAS) between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2020 . We validated the labeling of 135,000 unique de-identified AE reports and determined the associations between different system's root causes and patient consequences. The model was validated by independent expert anesthesiologists. ResultsThe machine learning (ML) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) model trained on 9559 AE datasets accurately categorized 8800 (88%) of reported AE. The three most frequent AE types were “difficult orotracheal intubation” (16.9% of AE reports), “medication error” (10.5%), and “post-induction hypotension” (6.9%). The accuracy of the AI model reached 70.9% sensitivity, 96.6% specificity for “difficult intubation”, 43.2% sensitivity, and 98.9% specificity for “medication error.” ConclusionsThis unsupervised ML method provides an accurate, automated, AI-supported search algorithm that ranks and helps to understand complex risk patterns and has greater speed, precision, and clarity when compared to manual human data extraction. Machine learning and Natural language processing (NLP) models can effectively be used to process natural language AE reports and augment expert clinician input. This model can support clinical applications and methodological standards and used to better inform and enhance decision-making for improved risk management and patient safety. Trial RegistrationThe study was approved by the ethics committee of the French Society of Anesthesiology (IRB 00010254-2020-20) and the CNIL (CNIL: 118 58 95) and the study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT: NCT05185479).

Effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on gastric mucosal visibility and retained gastric contents during EGD

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are increasingly used in diabetes and obesity management. Although GLP-1RAs delay gastric emptying, their impact on visibility during EGD remains uncertain. A 1:1 matched case-control study was conducted. Individuals undergoing EGD who were taking GLP-1RAs were matched to nonusers based on demographic characteristics and diabetes status. A validated scale (POLPREP) was used to determine gastric mucosal visibility scores. A total of 84 pairs (N= 168) were included. GLP-1RA users had significantly lower visibility scores, with a 2.42 times higher likelihood of lower scores compared with nonusers. In addition, GLP-1RA users had a higher incidence of retained gastric contents (13.1% vs 4.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 4.62; P= .025) and aborted procedures due to this issue. No anesthesia-related adverse events were observed. GLP-1RA use at the time of endoscopy exhibited higher odds of lower gastric mucosal visibility scores, retained contents, and aborted procedures. Further research is warranted.

Transfers and anesthesia-related postoperative outcomes after 3361 same-day cancer surgeries at a freestanding surgery center: An observational retrospective study.

Expanding outpatient surgery to the increasing number of procedures and patient populations warrants continuous evaluation of postoperative outcomes to ensure the best care and safety. We describe adverse postoperative outcomes and transfer rates related to anesthesia in a large sample of patients who underwent same-day cancer surgery at a freestanding ambulatory surgery center. Between January 2017 and June 2021, 3361 cancer surgeries, including breast and plastic, head and neck, gynecology, and urology, were performed. The surgeries were indicated for diagnosis, staging, and/or treatment. We report the incidence of transfers and adverse postoperative outcomes related to anesthesia. Breast and plastic surgeries were the most common (1771, 53%), followed by urology (1052, 31%), gynecology (410, 12%), and head and neck surgeries (128, 4%). Based on patients'first procedure, comorbidity levels were highest for urology (75% American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score 3, 1.7% score 4) and lowest for breast surgeries (31% score 3, 0.2% score 4). Most gynecology surgeries used general anesthesia (97.6%), whereas breast surgeries used the least (38%). A total of sevenpatients (0.2%; 95% CI: 0.08%-0.4%) were immediately transferred to an outside hospital; fourdue to anesthesia-related reasons. Only 7 (0.2%) patients needed additional postoperative care related to anesthesia-related adverse events, specifically cardiac events (4), difficult intubations (2), desaturation (1), and agitation, nausea, and headache (1). The incidence of anesthesia-related adverse postoperative outcomes is low in cancer patients undergoing outpatient surgeries at our freestanding ambulatory surgery center. This suggests that carefully selected cancer patients, including patients with metastatic cancer, can undergo anesthesia for same-day surgery, making cancer care accessible locally and reducing stress associated with travel for treatment. More research investigating complication rates related to surgery and to cancer disease trajectory are needed to establish a complete evaluation of safety for outpatient cancer surgery.

What Is the Incidence of Anesthesia-Related Adverse Events in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Offices? A Review of 61,237 Sedation Cases From a Large Private Practice Consortium

BackgroundThe safety of the anesthesia team model performed in oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMS) offices has been criticized by professional and mainstream media. PurposeThis study aims to assess the incidence of adverse anesthetic events (AE) associated with the OMS anesthesia team model and identify risk factors associated with AEs. Study design, setting, sampleThis was a retrospective cohort study utilizing a patient database from Paradigm Oral Health®, Lincoln, Nebraska, a managed service organization (MSO). Subjects included were 14 and older, undergoing open-airway intravenous anesthesia for ambulatory OMS procedures using the OMS anesthesia team model at multiple private practices in the MSO network between June 30th, 2010, and September 30th, 2022. Exclusion criteria included patients younger than 14 or patients with incomplete medical records. Predictor variablePrimary predictor variables were age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification system (ASA) score, type of surgical procedure performed, and the types of medications administered during sedation. Main outcome variableThe presence of an AE. The definition of an AE was modeled on the World Society of Intravenous Anesthesia (SIVA) definition. All AEs were identified through surrogate markers which were identified through chart review. One example of an AE is ventricular fibrillation, which necessitates application of medications, here the medication is the surrogate marker. CovariatesNone. AnalysesThe data were analyzed using t-tests and χ2 tests. P values ≤.05 were considered statistically significant. ResultsIncluded in the study were 61,237 sedation cases (53.87% female and 46.13% male), for 56,076 unique patients ranging from 14 to 98 years of age (mean 33.26 ± 18.35). An AE incidence of 3 per 100,000 per year (25 total events) was observed. Neither age, sex, ASA score, nor type of surgical procedure exhibited statistically significant associations with AEs. A statistically significant association was found between AEs and fentanyl (P = 0.0008). Conclusions and RelevanceThis investigation shows a smaller incidence of AEs than previous studies of the OMS anesthesia team model.

Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound without Anesthesiologist Support

Introduction: Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) is an effective treatment option for essential tremor (ET) and tremor dominant Parkinson’s disease (TDPD), which is often performed with sedation or in the presence of an anesthesiologist in an effort to minimize adverse events and maximize patient comfort. This study explores the safety, feasibility, and tolerability of performing MRgFUS without an anesthesiologist. Methods: This is a single academic center, retrospective review of 180 ET and TDPD patients who underwent MRgFUS treatment without anesthesiologist support. Patient demographics, intra-procedural treatment parameters, peri-procedural adverse events, and 3-month Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor Part B (CRST-B) scores were compared to MRgFUS studies that utilized varying degrees of anesthesia. Results: There were no anesthesia related adverse events or unsuccessful treatments. There were no early treatment terminations due to patient discomfort, regardless of skull density ratio. 94.6% of patients would repeat the procedure again. The most common side effects during treatment were facial/tongue paresthesia (26.3%), followed by nausea (22.3%), dysarthria (8.6%), and scalp pain (8.0%). No anxiolytic, pain, or antihypertensive medications were administered. The most common early adverse event after MRgFUS procedure was gait imbalance (58.3%). There was a significant reduction of 83.1% (83.4% ET and 80.5% TDPD) of the mean CRST-B scores of the treated hand when comparing 3-month and baseline scores (1.8 vs. 10.9, n = 109, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: MRgFUS without intra-procedural anesthesiologist support is a safe, feasible, and well-tolerated option, without an increase in peri-procedural adverse events.

Application of propofol-remifentanil intravenous general anesthesia combined with regional block in pediatric ophthalmic surgery

ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to observe the anesthetic effect and safety of intravenous anesthesia without muscle relaxant with propofol-remifentanil combined with regional block under laryngeal mask airway in pediatric ophthalmologic surgery.MethodsA total of 90 undergoing ophthalmic surgery were anesthetized with general anesthesia using the laryngeal mask airway without muscle relaxant. They were randomly divided into two groups: 45 children who received propofol-remifentanil intravenous anesthesia combined with regional block (LG group), and 45 children who received total intravenous anesthesia (G group). The peri-operative circulatory indicators, awakening time after general anesthesia, postoperative analgesic effect and the incidence of anesthesia-related adverse events were respectively compared between the two groups.ResultsAll the children successfully underwent the surgical procedure. The awakening time after general anesthesia and removal time of laryngeal mask were significantly shorter in the LG group than in the G group (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the heart rates in the perioperative period between the two groups (P > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of intraoperative physical response, respiratory depression, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and emergence agitation (EA) between the two groups (P > 0.05). The pain score at the postoperative hour 2 was lower in the LG group than in the G group (P < 0.05).ConclusionPropofol-remifentanil intravenous anesthesia combined with long-acting local anesthetic regional block anesthesia, combined with laryngeal mask ventilation technology without muscle relaxants, can be safely used in pediatric eye surgery to achieve rapid and smooth recovery from general anesthesia and better postoperative analgesia. This anesthesia scheme can improve the comfort and safety of children in perioperative period, and has a certain clinical popularization value.

Effect of Preoperative Accurate Evaluation and Intervention on Prognosis and Outcome in Elderly Patients with Painless Gastroenteroscopy: Protocol for A Single-Centre Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Factors such as abstinence from drinking, fasting, intestinal preparation, and stress responses can contribute to issues like inadequate blood volume, hypoglycemia, and electrolyte imbalances. The ASA classification presently serves as a primary assessment standard globally. In response to prevailing clinical challenges, we propose enhancing the preoperative assessment for elderly patients undergoing painless gastroenteroscopy. This enhancement involves incorporating the Frailty score, bedside ultrasound, and bedside laboratory results alongside the ASA classification, to establish a comprehensive assessment system. This holistic approach aims to monitor patients’ fluid balance, electrolyte levels, and blood glucose changes, facilitating precise interventions and optimized anesthesia strategies. The ultimate goal is to diminish perioperative adverse events, especially those related to the cardiovascular system, thereby enhancing prognosis, outcomes, and patient satisfaction among the elderly. Methods: This study is a randomized controlled trial conducted at a single center. It includes 204 patients scheduled for painless gastroenteroscopy. Eligible subjects will be randomly assigned to either Group A or Group B. Pre-anesthesia assessments will be conducted twice – during the preoperative visit and upon entry to the endoscopy center on the examination day. Evaluation parameters will encompass the Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS), bedside ultrasound measurements including inspiratory IVCDmax, expiratory IVCDmin, and calculation of the inferior vena cava collapse index (IVC-CI). Additionally, serum electrolyte (potassium) and blood glucose levels will be measured. Patients in Group A will receive specific interventions based on predetermined criteria. The primary endpoint is anesthesia-related adverse events. The measurements will be performed perioperatively, post-treatment, and at 1 day, 3 days, and 7 days after the end of treatment.

ED50 of remimazolam combined with different doses butorphanol for first trimester artificial abortion.

Remimazolam (RMZ) is a novel intravenous sedative drug of ultra-short benzodiazepine. The optimal dose of RMZ plus butorphanol for sedation during first trimester artificial abortion is unknown. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the median effective dose (ED50) of RMZ combined with different doses of butorphanol on the sedative effect for first-trimester artificial abortion. Sixty-one female patients were randomly assigned to Group B10 (31 patients) and Group B15 (30 patients). RMZ was administered 5 min after IV butorphanol at doses of 10 μg/kg (Group B10) and 15 μg/kg (Group B15). Cervical dilatation at the time of using a cervical dilating rod, if the patient has body movement and affects the gynecologist's operation, we define it as "Ineffective." Therefore, the dose of RMZ was increased in the next patient. Otherwise, it was defined as "Effective," and the dose of RMZ was reduced in the next patient. According to the pre-experiment, the first dose of RMZ in the first patient was 0.35 mg/kg, and the adjacent geometric dose ratio was 0.9. The centered isotonic regression was performed to determine the ED50 of RMZ. The total RMZ dose administered, recovery time, and anesthesia-related adverse events were all recorded. The ED50 (90% CI) of RMZ was 0.263 (0.215-0.310) mg/kg in Group B10, and 0.224 (0.191-0.261) mg/kg in Group B15, respectively. The recovery time in Group B10 was significantly shorter than in Group B15 (9.8 ± 2.3 vs. 12.5 ± 3.6 min, p ≤ 0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence rate of all anesthesia-related adverse events between the two groups (p > 0.05). The ED50 of RMZ combined with a 10 μg/kg or 15 μg/kg dose of butorphanol was 0.263 and 0.224 mg/kg during painless first trimester artificial abortion. However, RMZ combined with a 10 μg/kg dose of butorphanol seems to have a shorter recovery time. https://www.chictr.org.cn/bin/project/edit?pid=166623.

The median effective dose of propofol combined with butorphanol during artificial abortion: a randomized controlled trial

ObjectivePropofol-opioids are the most common drug combination and can reduce the dose of propofol and the incidence of adverse events in painless artificial abortion. We hypothesized that butorphanol may reduce the median effective dose (ED50) of propofol, propofol injection pain, and postoperative uterine contraction pain.MethodsThis was a randomized, double-blind, controlled study. A total of 54 female patients, who had ASA I or II, aged 18–49 years, undergoing painless artificial abortion, were randomly assigned into two groups, namely, Group P (propofol) and Group PB (propofol plus 10 μg/kg butorphanol). According to the pre-experiment, the initial dose of propofol for the P and PB groups was 3 and 2.5 mg/kg, respectively, with a dose gradient of 0.25 mg/kg. The ED50 of propofol was analyzed using probit regression analysis. The total propofol dose consumed, recovery time, and anesthesia-related adverse events were also recorded.ResultsThere were 25 and 29 patients in the P and PB groups, respectively. The ED50 (95% CI) of propofol for artificial abortion were 2.477 (2.186–2.737) and 1.555 (1.173–1.846) mg/kg in the P and PB groups, respectively. The total propofol dose consumed was (150.7 ± 21.7) mg and (110.4 ± 28.2) mg in the P and PB groups, respectively (P &amp;lt; 0.001). Compared with the P group, injection-site pain (76 vs. 20.7%) and uterine contraction pain (72 vs. 6.9%) in the PB group had a significant decrease (P &amp;lt; 0.001).ConclusionCombination of propofol with 10 μg/kg butorphanol reduced the ED50 of propofol and decreased the incidence of propofol injection-site pain and postoperative uterine contraction pain during painless artificial abortion compared with propofol alone.Clinical trial registrationhttps://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=166610, identifier: ChiCTR2200059795.

Application of early enteral nutrition nursing based on enhanced recovery after surgery theory in patients with digestive surgery.

Postoperative nursing can improve the restlessness and gastrointestinal function of patients with tracheal intubation under general anesthesia in digestive surgery. Wide application of various nursing methods and routine nursing in perioperative nursing of patients with general anesthesia in digestive surgery. To investigate the impact of early postoperative enteral nutrition nursing based on the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) theory on postoperative agitation and gastrointestinal recovery in patients undergoing general anesthesia that experienced tracheal intubation. The data of 126 patients with digestive surgery from May 2019 to February 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. According to different nursing methods, they were divided into control group and observation group, with 63 cases in observation group and 63 cases in control group. The patients in the control group had standard perioperative nursing care, whereas those in the observation group got enteral nourishment as soon as possible after surgery in accordance with ERAS theory. Both the rate and quality of gastrointestinal function recovery were compared between the two groups after treatment ended. Postoperative anesthesia-related adverse events were tallied, patients' nutritional statuses were monitored, and the Riker sedation and agitation score (SAS) was used to measure the incidence of agitation. When compared to the control group, the awake duration, spontaneous breathing recovery time, extubation time and postoperative eye-opening time were all considerably shorter (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the recovery time of orientation force between the two groups (P > 0.05); however, the observation group had a lower SAS score than the control group (P < 0.05). The recovery time for normal intestinal sounds, the time it took to have the first postoperative exhaust, the time it took to have the first postoperative defecation, and the time it took to have the first postoperative half-fluid feeding were all faster in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05); Fasting blood glucose was lower in the observation group compared to the control group (P < 0.05), while the albumin and hemoglobin levels were higher on the first and third postoperative days; however, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of anesthesia-related adverse reactions between the two groups (P > 0.05). The extremely early postoperative enteral nutrition nursing based on ERAS theory can reduce the degree of agitation, improve the quality of recovery, promote the recovery of gastrointestinal function, and improve the nutritional status of patients in the recovery period after tracheal intubation under general anesthesia.

Determining the 90% Effective Dose of Remimazolam Inhibiting Responses to Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Insertion in Adults: A Double-Blind Study Utilizing a Biased Coin Up-and-Down Sequential Method

Background. Remimazolam, a benzodiazepine sedative with clinical advantages, is used for anesthesia during GI endoscopy. However, the accurate clinical dosage remains understudied. This study aims to investigate the 90% effective dose (ED90) of remimazolam in inhibiting responses to upper GI endoscopy insertion and evaluate its efficacy and safety for upper GI endoscopic diagnosis and treatment. Methods. A total of 54 adult patients undergoing upper GI endoscopy under procedural sedation were included, and they were anesthetized with an intravenous bolus of remimazolam. The first patient was given a dose of 0.3 mg/kg of remimazolam and was next randomized according to a biased coin design (BCD) method, and each patient received a dose of remimazolam depending on the response of the previous patient. A positive reaction was defined as no choking cough, nausea and vomiting, and/or motor response during placement of the upper GI endoscope into pharyngeal cavity or within 3 minutes after placement; otherwise, it was a negative reaction. If positive, randomize the next patient’s dose of remimazolam to be unchanged or decrease by 0.05 mg/kg. If negative, increase the next patient’s dose of remimazolam by 0.05 mg/kg. According to the study protocol, at least 45 patients with positive reactions were needed to suspend the trial while monitoring anesthesia-related adverse events. Results. The ED90 of remimazolam for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy insertion was 0.556 mg/kg (95% CI: 0.399–0.578). All patients maintained stable circulation and no serious adverse events were observed during sedation. Patient satisfaction was 4.89 ± 0.69 points, anesthesiologist satisfaction was 4.57 ± 0.96 points, and endoscopist satisfaction was 4.67 ± 0.87 points (full score 5 points, minimum 1 point). Conclusion. The use of remimazolam for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was safe and effective, with a single intravenous bolus at an ED90 dose of 0.556 mg/kg inhibiting responses to the procedure.

Perioperative Anesthesia-Related Complications and Risk Factors in Children: A Cross-Sectional Observation Study in Rwanda.

Despite an increasing awareness of the unmet burden of surgical conditions, information on perioperative complications in children remains limited especially in low-income countries such as Rwanda. The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of perioperative anesthesia-related adverse events and to explore potential risk factors associated with them among pediatric surgical patients in public referral hospitals in Rwanda. Data were collected for all patients under 5 years of age undergoing surgery in 3 public referral hospitals in Rwanda from June to December 2015. Patient and family history, type of surgery, comorbidities, anesthesia technique, intraoperative adverse events and postoperative events in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) were recorded. The incidence of perioperative adverse events was assessed and associated risk factors analyzed with univariate logistic regression. Of 354 patients enrolled in this study 11 children had a cardiac arrest. Six (1.7%) suffered an intraoperative cardiac arrest, 2 of whom (0.6%) died intraoperatively. In the PACU, 6 (1.8%) suffered a postoperative cardiac arrest, 5 of whom (1.5%) died in the PACU. One child had both an intraoperative cardiac arrest and then a cardiac arrest in PACU but survived. Eighty-nine children (25.1%) had an intraoperative adverse event, whereas 67 (20.6%) had an adverse event in PACU. A review of the cases where cardiac arrest or death occurred indicated that there were significant lapses in the expected standard of care. Age <1 week was associated with cardiac arrest or death. The rate of perioperative complications, including death, for children undergoing surgery in tertiary care hospitals in Rwanda was high. Quality improvement measures are needed to decrease this rate among surgical pediatric patients in this low resource setting.

Analysis of anesthesia related severe adverse events in congenital catheterization cases from a single institution.

Analysis of anesthesia related severe adverse events in congenital catheterization cases from a single institution.

Anesthesia-related Adverse Events in Obstetric Patients: A Population-based Study in Canada

(Can J Anaesth. 2022;69:72–85) Anesthesia-related morbidity, while rare, is a useful indicator for obstetric care quality and patient safety during childbirth. Previous studies—including those correlating anesthesia complications with cardiac arrest, pre-existing conditions, living in rural areas, neuraxial block, respiratory arrest, and unrecognized spinal catheterization—focused on specific neuraxial anesthesia or specific complications instead of analyzing multiple complications within a large population. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of anesthesia complications as well as the association of anesthesia-related adverse events and medical or obstetric conditions.

The role of anesthesiologists’ perceived self-efficacy in anesthesia-related adverse events

BackgroundSelf-efficacy, as the vital determinant of behavior, influencing clinicians’ situation awareness, work performance, and medical decision-making, might affect the incidence of anesthesia-related adverse events (ARAEs). This study was employed to evaluate the association between perceived self-efficacy level and ARAEs.MethodsA cross-sectional study was performed in the form of an online self-completion questionnaire-based survey. Self-efficacy was evaluated via validated 4-point Likert scales. Internal reliability and validity of both scales were also estimated via Cronbach’s alpha and validity analysis. According to the total self-efficacy score, respondents were divided into two groups: normal level group and high level group. Propensity score matching and multivariable logistic regression were employed to identify the relationship between self-efficacy level and ARAEs.ResultsThe response rate of this study was 34%. Of the 1011 qualified respondents, 38% were women. The mean (SD) age was 35.30 (8.19) years. The Cronbach’s alpha of self-efficacy was 0.92. The KMO (KMO and Bartlett's test) value of the scale was 0.92. ARAEs occurred in 178 (33.0%) of normal level self-efficacy group and 118 (25.0%) of high level self-efficacy group. Before adjustment, high level self-efficacy was associated with a decreased incidence of ARAEs (RR [relative risk], 0.76; 95% CI [confidence interval], 0.62–0.92). After adjustment, high level self-efficacy was also associated with a decreased incidence of ARAEs (aRR [adjusted relative risk], 0.63, 95% CI, 0.51–0.77). In multivariable logistic regression, when other covariates including years of experience, drinking, and the hospital ranking were controlled, self-efficacy level (OR [odds ratio], 0.62; 95% CI, 0.46–0.82; P = 0.001) was significantly correlated with ARAEs.ConclusionsOur results found a clinically meaningful and statistically significant correlation between self-efficacy and ARAEs. These findings partly support medical educators and governors in enhancing self-efficacy construction in clinical practice and training.

Risk factors for unintentional tube-disconnection incidents for patients under general anesthesia: A retrospective analysis of anesthesia-related adverse events.

article: Risk factors for unintentional tube-disconnection incidents for patients under general anesthesia: A retrospective analysis of anesthesia-related adverse events - Minerva Anestesiologica 2022 July-August;88(7-8):637-9 - Minerva Medica - Journals