Androgen Receptor Axis-targeted Agents Research Articles

Connecting Gene Variation to Treatment Outcomes in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Adenocarcinoma: Insights into Second-Generation Androgen Receptor Axis-Targeted Therapies.

Prostate cancer (PC) is one of the most commonly diagnosed tumours among men. Second-generation androgen receptor axis-targeted (ARAT) agents, namely abiraterone acetate (AbA) and enzalutamide (ENZ), are currently used in the management of metastatic castration-resistant PC (mCRPC). However, the treatment is challenging due to the lack of prognostic biomarkers. Meanwhile, single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have emerged as potential prognostic indicators of mCRPC. Thus, this study evaluated the impact of relevant SNPs on the treatment outcomes of 123 mCRPC patients enrolled in a hospital-based cohort study. The CYP17A1 rs2486758 C allele was associated with a 50% reduction in the risk of developing castration resistance (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.55; p = 0.003). Among patients without metastasis at tumour diagnosis and under AbA, a marginal association between YBX1 rs10493112 and progression-free survival was detected (log-rank test, p = 0.056). In the same subgroup, significant associations of HSD3B1 rs1047303 (CC/CA vs. AA; HR = 3.41; p = 0.025), YBX1 rs12030724 (AT vs. AA; HR = 3.54; p = 0.039) and YBX1 rs10493112 (log-rank test, p = 0.041; CC vs. AA/AC; HR = 3.22; p = 0.053) with overall survival were also observed, which were confirmed by multivariate Cox analyses. Although validation with larger cohorts is required, these findings suggest that SNPs could enhance the prognosis assessment of mCRPC patients, leading to a more personalised treatment.

Impact of Novel Agents on Patient Characteristics, Treatment Patterns, and Outcomes in Patients With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.

The therapeutic landscape for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) has changed dramatically with the introduction of several novel agents. However, limited data are available to determine whether the introduction of novel agents affected patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes compared with the period when these agents were not available. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of the introduction of novel mCRPC agents on patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes. Two cohorts of Japanese patients diagnosed with mCRPC between 2009 and 2014 (Epoch 1) and 2015 and 2019 (Epoch 2) were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 125 treatment-naïve mCRPC patients, consisting of 42 patients in Epoch 1 and 83 patients in Epoch 2, were evaluated. We obtained the following results: (i) a dramatic shift in the first-line treatment from docetaxel to androgen receptor axis-targeted agents (ARATs), (ii) an age range expansion for first-line treatment, and (iii) an overall survival (OS) advantage in Eopch 2 compared to Epoch 1. Multivariate analysis in the overall population showed that Epoch 2 and low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels at the start of first-line treatment were independent prognostic factors for OS. In real-world mCRPC practice, the introduction of novel agents has improved the prognosis of mCRPC while allowing more patients to receive mCRPC treatment across a broad age range. In addition, low PSA levels at the start of first-line treatment were associated with improved OS, indicating the importance of starting mCRPC treatment while PSA levels are low.

Cardiovascular Toxicity Associated With Androgen Receptor Axis-Targeted Agents in Patients With Prostate Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

IntroductionSecond-generation androgen receptor axis-targeting (ARAT) agents have become a standard treatment for patients with advanced prostate cancer (PC), however much remains unknown about the potential cardiovascular toxicities. Patients and MethodsWe performed a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library for randomized controlled trials of patients receiving ARAT agents for PC from inception to March 2023. The odds ratios (ORs) of all-grade and high-grade cardiovascular adverse events (CVAEs) for patients treated with and without ARAT agents were pooled for meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses based on PC type and treatment regimen were conducted. ResultsA total of 15 double-blind placebo-controlled phase 3 trials comprising 15,842 patients were included. In addition to hot flush and hypertension of any degree of severity, inclusion of ARAT agents was associated with a significantly higher risk of acute myocardial infarction (OR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.05-3.68, P = .04), myocardial infarction (OR: 2.44, 95% CI: 1.27-4.66, P = .007) and angina pectoris (OR: 2.00, 95% CI: 1.00-4.02, P = .05). With regard to individual ARAT agents, enzalutamide was associated with a significantly higher risk of acute myocardial infarction (OR: 3.11, 95% CI: 1.17-8.28, P = .02), coronary artery disease (OR: 8.33, 95% CI: 1.54-44.95, P = .01), and high-grade hypertension (OR: 4.94, 95% CI: 1.11-22.06, P = .04), while abiraterone and apalutamide were associated with a significantly higher risk of angina pectoris (OR: 5.48, 95% CI: 1.23-24.33, P = .03) and myocardial infarction (OR: 7.00, 95% CI: 1.60-30.62, P = .01), respectively. ConclusionThe inclusion of ARAT agents was associated with a significantly higher risk of several CVAEs. Clinicians should remain vigilant, both in pre-treatment screening and monitoring for clinical symptoms and signs, when considering ARAT agent particularly for patients with pre-existing risk factors.

Real-world effects of novel androgen receptor axis-targeted agents on oncological outcomes in non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A multi-institutional retrospective study.

142 Background: The benefits of novel androgen receptor axis-targeted agents (ARATs) on oncological outcomes in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) in real-world settings are unclear. Methods: This multi-institutional retrospective study included 178 patients with nmCRPC treated between September 2003 and August 2022. Patients were divided into two groups: those who were treated with any novel ARATs, including apalutamide, enzalutamide, darolutamide, and abiraterone acetate, during any line of nmCRPC treatment (novel ARATs group) and those who were not (control group). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to evaluate the effects of novel ARATs on metastasis-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: The median age and follow-up period after nmCRPC diagnosis were 76 years and 37 months, respectively. Of the 178 patients, 122 (69%) were treated with novel ARATs after nmCRPC diagnosis. The MFS and OS in the novel ARATs group were significantly longer than those in the control group ( P < 0.001 and P = 0.020, respectively). In multivariable analyses, a prostate-specific antigen doubling time (PSADT) of < 3 months and novel ARATs were independently and significantly associated with MFS and OS (Table). The effects of novel ARATs on MFS were consistently observed across subgroups stratified by age (< 75 years or ≥ 75 years), history of radical treatment (no or yes), biopsy Gleason score (< 9 or ≥ 9), clinical stage (≤ cT3 and cN0, or cT4 or cN1), and PSADT (≥ 3 months or < 3 months). Conclusions: Novel ARATs were significantly associated with improved oncological outcomes in patients with nmCRPC in a real-world setting, regardless of tumor aggressiveness. [Table: see text]

Real-world effects of novel androgen receptor axis-targeted agents on oncological outcomes in non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A multi-institutional retrospective study

BackgroundThe benefits of novel androgen receptor axis-targeted agents (ARATs) on oncological outcomes in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) in real-world settings are unclear. MethodsThis multi-institutional retrospective study included 178 patients with nmCRPC treated between September 2003 and August 2022. Patients were divided into two groups: those who were treated with any novel ARATs, including apalutamide, enzalutamide, darolutamide, and abiraterone acetate, during any line of nmCRPC treatment (novel ARATs group) and those who were not (control group). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to evaluate the effects of novel ARATs on metastasis-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS). ResultsThe median age and follow-up period after nmCRPC diagnosis were 76 years and 37 months, respectively. Of the 178 patients, 122 (69%) were treated with novel ARATs after nmCRPC diagnosis. The MFS and OS in the novel ARATs group were significantly longer than those in the control group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.020, respectively). In multivariable analyses, a prostate-specific antigen doubling time (PSADT) of <3 months and novel ARATs were independently and significantly associated with MFS and OS. The effects of novel ARATs on MFS were consistently observed across subgroups stratified by age (<75 years or ≥75 years), history of radical treatment (no or yes), biopsy Gleason score (<9 or ≥9), clinical stage (≤cT3 and cN0, or cT4 or cN1), and PSADT (≥3 months or <3 months). ConclusionNovel ARATs were significantly associated with improved oncological outcomes in patients with nmCRPC in a real-world setting, regardless of tumor aggressiveness.

Survival outcome of chemotherapy-naïve castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with new-generation androgen receptor axis-targeted agents in real-world analysis.

The androgen receptor axis-targeted (ARAT) agents abiraterone and enzalutamide have been introduced against castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). However, determining which of these agents should be used first is a clinical challenge. Therefore, in this study, we compared the efficacy of first-line abiraterone and enzalutamide treatments in chemotherapy-naïve patients with CRPC. A total of 242 chemotherapy-naïve CRPC cases treated with first-line ARAT were analyzed. Outcome measures were PSA response, PSA progression-free survival (PSA-PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), cancer specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Abiraterone (A) and enzalutamide (E) were administered to 61 and 181 patients, respectively. The median PSA response rate (- 65.4% [A] and - 78.8% [E], p = 0.0341), PSA decline ≥ 30% (55.7% [A] and 72.9% [E], p = 0.0183), PSA-PFS (median 4months [A] and 8months [E], p = 0.0126), TTF (median 6months [A] and 14months [E], p < 0.0001), CSS (median 45months [A] and not reached [E], p < 0.0001), and OS (median 28months [A] and 80months [E], p < 0.001) were significantly better in the enzalutamide group. In the multivariate analyses for CSS and OS, ALP (p = 0.00376) and ARAT (p < 0.001) (CSS), evidence of metastasis (p = 0.0467), Hb (p = 0.00205), and ARAT (p = 0.00514) (OS) were significant factors, respectively. This study showed that PSA response, PSA-PFS, TTF, CSS, and OS were better with first-line enzalutamide administration. Direct inhibition of androgen receptor signaling by enzalutamide is associated with better clinical outcomes.

Poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor combinations in first-line metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer setting: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

To compare radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) among patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) receiving a combination of first-line poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) plus androgen receptor axis-targeted agents (ARAT) vs placebo/ARAT. We conducted a systematic review/meta-analysis of all published Phase III randomised controlled trials using EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane (inception until 6 June 2023). Published full-text manuscripts and conference abstracts were inclusion eligible. Study selection/data extraction were independently performed by two authors. The Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 Tool was used, and certainty of evidence assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations framework. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and relative risks, with corresponding confidence intervals (CIs), were generated using random-effects models. Three trials were identified: PROpel, MAGNITUDE, and TALAPRO-2. Compared to placebo/ARAT, the PARPi/ARAT combination was associated with a 35% rPFS improvement in the overall cohort (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.56-0.76), with 68%, 45%, and 26% improvements in the BReast CAncer gene 1/gene 2 (BRCA1/2)-mutated (BRCA1/2m; P < 0.001), homologous recombination repair-mutated (HRRm; P < 0.001), and non-HRRm cohorts (P = 0.003), respectively. OS data maturity ranged from 31% to 48%, with overall cohort OS data unavailable from MAGNITUDE. The PROpel/TALAPRO-2 pooled analysis demonstrated a 16% OS improvement in the overall cohort (HR 0.84, 95 CI 0.72-0.98; P = 0.02). OS in the HRRm (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.61-0.95) and the BRCA1/2m cohorts (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.18-1.56) were improved, with a higher effect magnitude compared to the overall cohort. This combination was associated with a 45% relative risk increase in Grade ≥3 TEAEs, including 6.22-fold for Grade ≥3 anaemia (31.9% vs 4.9%). The addition of PARPi to ARAT in the first-line mCRPC setting is associated with rPFS benefits across subgroups, with the greatest magnitude of benefit in BRCA1/2m patients. OS benefits remain inconsistent irrespective of HRRm status, with significant increases in Grade ≥3 TEAEs, particularly anaemia. Currently, we suggest this combined approach be selectively offered to HRRm patients, preferentially BRCA1/2m.

Trends in the use of local intervention for metastatic hormone-naïve prostate cancer: A multicenter retrospective study.

To evaluated the trends of local intervention and their impact on oncological outcomes in metastatic hormone-naïve prostate cancer (mHNPC) in real-world practice. This retrospective multicenter study included 760 patients treated with either androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) without local treatment (no castration-resistant prostate cancer [CRPC] progression within 12 months, control group) or ADT plus local intervention (intervention group) between January 2005 and March 2022. We evaluated the trends in the use of local intervention in patients with mHNPC and factors associated with CRPC-free survival in the intervention group. The use of local intervention gradually increased in combination with upfront combination treatment (docetaxel or androgen receptor axis-targeted agents) for the duration of our study. The number of patients with local intervention combined with upfront treatment was significantly higher in patients with high tumor burden disease than in those with low tumor burden disease. Of the 108 patients who received local intervention, a duration of ≤7 months of initial therapy before local intervention and a level of prostate-specific antigen ≥0.20 ng/mL at the time of local intervention were significantly associated with poor CRPC-free survival. The use of local intervention in combination with upfront therapy to treat mHNPC increased for the duration of our study regardless of the tumor burden. Local intervention in addition to the standard of care for mHNPC may be a feasible treatment option for selected patients, taking into consideration the duration of and response to initial treatment.

Plasmatic MicroRNAs and Treatment Outcomes of Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Hospital-Based Cohort Study and In Silico Analysis.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common malignancies among men worldwide. Inevitably, all advanced PCa patients develop metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), an aggressive phase of the disease. Treating mCRPC is challenging, and prognostic tools are needed for disease management. MicroRNA (miRNA) deregulation has been reported in PCa, constituting potential non-invasive prognostic biomarkers. As such, this study aimed to evaluate the prognostic potential of nine miRNAs in the liquid biopsies (plasma) of mCRPC patients treated with second-generation androgen receptor axis-targeted (ARAT) agents, abiraterone acetate (AbA) and enzalutamide (ENZ). Low expression levels of miR-16-5p and miR-145-5p in mCRPC patients treated with AbA were significantly associated with lower progression-free survival (PFS). The two miRNAs were the only predictors of the risk of disease progression in AbA-stratified analyses. Low miR-20a-5p levels in mCRPC patients with Gleason scores of <8 were associated with worse overall survival (OS). The transcript seems to predict the risk of death regardless of the ARAT agent. According to the in silico analyses, miR-16-5p, miR-145-5p, and miR-20a-5p seem to be implicated in several processes, namely, cell cycle, proliferation, migration, survival, metabolism, and angiogenesis, suggesting an epigenetic mechanism related to treatment outcome. These miRNAs may represent attractive prognostic tools to be used in mCRPC management, as well as a step further in the identification of new potential therapeutic targets, to use in combination with ARAT for an improved treatment outcome. Despite the promising results, real-world validation is necessary.

Trends in the Use of Second-Generation Androgen Receptor Axis Inhibitors for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer and Clinical Factors Predicting Biological Recurrence.

The advent of second-generation androgen receptor axis-targeted agents (ARATs) has revolutionized the treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) was used to compare the efficacy of each ARAT. This multicenter retrospective study included 581 patients with newly diagnosed mHSPC who received first-line hormone therapy. The characteristics of patients treated with different ARATs were compared as well as changes in the usage of each drug over time. For BRFS, the apalutamide (Apa) and enzalutamide (Enza) groups, as well as the abiraterone acetate (Abi) and Apa/Enza groups, were compared. In addition, multivariate analysis was performed to determine predictive factors for biochemical recurrence (BCR). The use of second-generation ARATs tended to increase after May 2020. No significant difference in BRFS was found between patients receiving Apa and Enza (p = 0.490) and those receiving Abi or Apa/Enza (p = 0.906). Multivariate analysis revealed that the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥ 2.76 and PSA ≥ 0.550 ng/mL were independent predictors of BCR. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics or BRFS in patients with mHSPC receiving different ARATs as first-line treatment. NLR and PSA may be prognostic factors following the first-line treatment of patients with mHSPC.

Is it Necessary to Treat all Metastatic Prostate Cancer With Upfront Androgen Receptor Axis-targeted Agents?

In recent years, initial treatment for patients with high-risk metastatic castration-sensitive (mCS) prostate cancer (PC) has been shifting from vintage hormone therapy to upfront androgen receptor axis-targeted agents (ARAT), but the proportion of Asian patients enrolled in clinical trials investigating the effectiveness of ARAT use is low. We examined the outcomes of Japanese patients with mCSPC who received ARAT as second-line therapy or afterwards. Among the PC patients receiving treatment at Kanazawa University Hospital from 2000 to 2019, 190 patients with mCSPC were enrolled in the study. Their characteristics and prognosis were retrospectively investigated. All patients received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) as initial treatment. A total of 142 (74.3%) of 190 patients had progression to castration-resistant PC (CRPC), of whom 77 (54.2%) received ARAT as second-line therapy or afterwards. The median overall survival (OS) of CRPC patients was 70.57 months and the median OS from CRPC was 44.88 months. The median OS of LATITUDE high-risk patients that used ARAT after the second-line treatment was 56.15 months, which was significantly longer than that of patients who did not use ARAT (hazard ratio=0.68, 95% confidence interval=0.40-1.15; p=0.0089). The prognosis of LATITUDE high-risk patients with CRPC selected for initial ADT therapy had a good prognosis compared to findings in other studies. These results suggest that there is a possibility that a certain number of patients with LATITUDE high-risk may have good prognosis even if only conventional ADT is performed and ARAT is used after CRPC.

Clinical utility of IDC-P (intraductal carcinoma of the prostate) in the decision making of initial treatment for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.

93 Background: In recent years, the usefulness of using androgen receptor axis-targeted agents (ARAT) such as abiraterone, enzalutamide, and apalutamide for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) in the up-front setting has been demonstrated. However, it is still unclear which patients could truly benefit from these treatments. On the other hand, intraductal carcinoma of prostate (IDC-P) is a known poor prognostic factor for prostate cancer patients. In the present study, we investigated the association between the presence of IDC-P and therapeutic response to mHSPC. Methods: This retrospective analysis included 318 patients with mHSPC from thirteen affiliated institutions between 2014 and 2021, and evaluated biopsy specimens for the presence of IDC-P. All patients were grouped by their first-line treatment, either ARAT (n=100, receiving a combination of androgen-deprivation therapy [ADT] and ARAT), or conventional therapy (n=218, receiving ADT with or without standard antiandrogen agents). We compared overall survival (OS) and second progression-free survival (PFS2) between the ARAT and conventional groups according to the presence of IDC-P to evaluate whether presence of IDC-P predicts response to each treatment. The PFS2 was defined as the period from diagnosis of mHSPC to disease progression on second-line therapy or death. Propensity score matching was used for one-to-one nearest neighbor matching in order to minimize the potential effects of selection bias and confounding factors. The clinicopathological variables of patients were well balanced after propensity score matching. Results: Most patients in the ARAT (79%) and conventional therapy (71%) groups were ICD-P positive. In the propensity score-matched cohort, OS and PFS2 of IDC-P positive cases were significantly prolonged in the ARAT group compared to the conventional group (OS: hazard ratio [HR], 0.36; p=0.047; PFS2: HR, 0.30; p&lt;0.001). In contrast, IDC-P negative cases did not show a difference in OS and PFS2 between the ARAT and the conventional groups (OS: HR, 1.09; p=0.920; PFS2: HR, 0.40; p=0.264). Conclusions: The findings highlight a high prevalence of IDC-P among patients with mHSPC and suggest that IDC-P may be a reliable indicator to implement ARAT as first-line therapy.

Improving quality of life in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: the role of androgen receptor axis-targeted agents

Androgen receptor axis-targeted agents (ARTAs), specifically enzalutamide and abiraterone acetate, have significantly extended the survival of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), making them the standard of care for mCRPC. In addition, the impact of both drugs on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) represents an important therapeutic objective of mCRPC patients. This article aimed to review clinical evidence of HRQoL in mCRPC men treated with abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide and identify their potential benefits and correlation with overall survival or disease progression based on a literature search of randomized clinical trials, studies from real clinical practice and professional guidelines up to October 2022. The synthesized evidence showed that HRQoL of both novel hormonal therapies (NHTs) was evaluated as a secondary endpoint in pivotal trials. The results revealed that these novel agents might improve the HRQoL of mCRPC patients. However, it was difficult to compare the results between trials due to inconsistencies in trial designs and instruments. Correlation tests showed a positive correlation with HRQoL and clinical efficacy outcomes. Patient perspective was assessed only in a few comparative trials. In conclusion, both abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide improved the HRQoL of mCRPC patients. Nevertheless, further research is warranted as there was a limited number of head-to-head trials directly comparing the overall effects of ARTAs for mCRPC.

Prostate-specific Antigen Kinetics During Androgen-deprivation Therapy Predict Response to Enzalutamide in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.

No practical predictive biomarkers exist to date for the response to androgen receptor-axis targeted (ARAT) therapies in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This study investigated whether prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics in primary androgen-deprivation therapy for advanced hormone-sensitive prostate cancer may be associated with the response to ARAT agents in mCRPC. This study assessed 102 patients with mCRPC treated with enzalutamide or abiraterone to evaluate the associations between clinical outcomes and PSA kinetics, including the ratio of initial to nadir PSA (I/N PSA) level in primary combined androgen blockade. The PSA response was defined as a ≥50% decrease at 3 months from baseline in patients with mCRPC. In patients treated with enzalutamide, the optimal cut-off I/N PSA value for PSA response was 531 ng/ml (sensitivity=66.7%, specificity=88.2%, area under the curve=0.73, using a receiver operating characteristic curve). The PSA response was 83.3% and 25.0% in the high and low I/N PSA groups, respectively. The median overall survival and radiographic progression-free survival from enzalutamide initiation were longer for the high compared to the low I/N PSA group. Multivariate analysis revealed I/N PSA (hazard ratio=0.275, p=0.026) as an independent risk factor for overall survival in the patients treated with enzalutamide. In contrast, I/N PSA showed no predictive ability for PSA response in patients treated with abiraterone. In patients with mCRPC, I/N PSA can be a practical predictive biomarker for response to the ARAT agent enzalutamide.

Plasma progastrin-releasing peptide level shows different predictive profiles for treatment response by androgen receptor axis-targeted agents in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

The neuroendocrine (NE) pathway cannot be ignored as a mechanism for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) progression. The neuromediator, gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) may be involved in the aberrant activation of the normal androgen receptor (AR) and increased AR variants. This study focused on plasma levels of progastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP) and examined the treatment outcomes with androgen receptor axis-targeted (ARAT) agents. One hundred patients with metastatic CRPC were enrolled. Enzalutamide (ENZ) or abiraterone acetate/prednisone (AA/P) were administered to 50 patients each in a nonrandomized manner as a first-line or later choice. Plasma ProGRP levels were determined using a chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay, and data were collected prospectively. The study endpoints were prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and survival estimates. In the ENZ series, ProGRP levels correlated with the maximum PSA change from baseline (high ProGRP: -34.5% vs. low ProGRP: -85.7% p= .033). PSA progression-free survival (PFS), radiographic/symptomatic (r/s) PFS, and overall survival (OS) in patients with high ProGRP were significantly worse than those in patients with low ProGRP (median PSA-PFS: 3.3 vs. 10.0months, p =.001, r/s PFS: 5.0 vs. 15.0months, p< 0.001, and OS 17.5 vs. 49.0months, p< .001, respectively). In addition, ProGRP showed an independent predictive value for all survival estimates in multivariate analyses. In the AA/P series, ProGRP levels did not correlate with the PSA change or predict PSA-PFS and r/s PFS, but they maintained a significant difference in OS (19.0 vs. 48.0months, p= .003). Plasma ProGRP provides a consistent predictive value for OS in metastatic CRPC patients who underwent therapy with ARAT agents. Meanwhile, ProGRP showed different predictive profiles for PSA- and r/s PFS between ENZ and AA/P. These findings clinically suggest a mechanism for CRPC progression involving the NE pathway via the GRP. The underlying mechanism of different predictive profiles by the ARAT agent should be explored in future research.

Clinical utility of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate in treatment selection for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.

In recent years, the usefulness of androgen receptor axis-targeted agents (ARATs) such as abiraterone, enzalutamide, and apalutamide for the upfront treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) has been demonstrated. However, it remains unclear which patients would truly benefit from these treatments. Furthermore, intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) is a known poor prognostic factor in patients with prostate cancer. We investigated the association between the presence of IDC-P and response to therapy in patients with mHSPC. This retrospective analysis included 318 patients with mHSPC who received treatment at Nagoya University and its 12 affiliated institutions between 2014 and 2021. Their biopsy specimens were evaluated for the presence of IDC-P. The patients were classified according to their first-line treatment into the ARAT (n = 100, receiving a combination of androgen-deprivation therapy [ADT] and ARAT) or conventional therapy (n = 218, receiving ADT with or without standard antiandrogen agents) group. We compared the overall survival (OS) and second progression-free survival (PFS2) between the ARAT and conventional groups according to the presence of IDC-P to evaluate whether presence of IDC-P predicts the response to each treatment. PFS2 was defined as the period from mHSPC diagnosis to disease progression on second-line treatment or death. Propensity score matching with one-to-one nearest-neighbor matching was used to minimize the potential effects of selection bias and confounding factors. The clinicopathological variables of the patients were well-balanced after propensity score matching. Most patients in the ARAT (79%) and conventional therapy (71%) groups were ICD-P positive. In the propensity score-matched cohort, the OS and PFS2 of IDC-P-positive patients were significantly longer in the ARAT group than in the conventional group (OS: hazard ratio [HR], 0.36; p = 0.047; PFS2: HR, 0.30; p < 0.001). In contrast, no difference in OS and PFS2 was observed between the ARAT and conventional groups in IDC-P-negative patients (OS: HR, 1.09; p = 0.920; PFS2: HR, 0.40; p = 0.264). The findings highlight a high prevalence of IDC-P among patients with mHSPC and suggest that IDC-P positivity may be a reliable indicator that ARAT should be implemented as first-line treatment.

Androgen receptor axis-targeted agents are not superior to conventional hormonal therapy for treatment of metastatic prostate cancer.

The present study aimed to use real-world Japanese data to compare the treatment outcome of conventional hormonal therapy to that of using androgen receptor axis-targeted (ARAT) agents for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The overall survival between the conventional hormonal therapy group and the ARAT agent therapy group was compared using a group of 75 Japanese patients who were treated for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. A subgroup analysis was carried out and the risk factors that affected overall survival (OS) were determined. The median OS from the time of prostate-specific antigen recurrence was 73.1 months in the ARAT group and 45.2 months in the conventional treatment group (P=0.414). Although OS tended to be slightly longer in the ARAT group, the difference between the groups was not significant. Subgroup analysis suggested that the therapeutic outcome of using ARAT agents tended to be less beneficial in patients who were older, and in those with a higher tumor volume or low Gleason grade. In conclusion, use of ARAT agents did not impart a significant survival benefit to patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer when compared with survival rates in response to conventional therapy. However, there was some clinical benefit when ARAT agents were used after patients developed castration-resistant prostate cancer. These findings suggest that up-front therapy using ARAT agents at the time of the initial hormone therapy can impart clinical benefit in Japanese patients with metastatic prostate cancer.

Emerging Biomarker-Guided Therapies in Prostate Cancer.

Prostate cancer remains one of the leading causes of cancer death in men worldwide. In the past decade, several new treatments for advanced prostate cancer have been approved. With a wide variety of available drugs, including cytotoxic agents, androgen receptor axis-targeted therapies, and alpha-emitting radiation therapy, identifying their optimal sequencing remains a challenge. Progress in the understanding of the biology of prostate cancer has provided an opportunity for a more refined and personalized treatment selection process. With the advancement of molecular sequencing techniques, genomic precision through the identification of potential treatment targets and predictive biomarkers has been rapidly evolving. In this review, we discussed biomarker-driven treatments for advanced prostate cancer. First, we presented predictive biomarkers for established, global standard treatments for advanced diseases, such as chemotherapy and androgen receptor axis-targeted agents. We also discussed targeted agents with recent approval for special populations, such as poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer with homologous recombination repair-deficient tumors, pembrolizumab in patients with high levels of microsatellite instability or high tumor mutational burden, and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) directed radioligand theragnostic treatment for PSMA expressing tumors. Additionally, we discussed evolving treatments, such as cancer vaccines, chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CAR-T), Bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs), other targeted agents such as AKT inhibitors, and various combination treatments. In summary, advances in molecular genetics have begun to propel personalized medicine forward in the management of advanced prostate cancer, allowing for a more precise, biomarker-driven treatment selection with the goal of improving overall efficacy.

Comment on: "Androgen receptor axis-targeted agents for non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer impact on overall survival and safety profile: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis".

Comment on: “Androgen receptor axis-targeted agents for non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer impact on overall survival and safety profile: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis”

Real-world management of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): A national multicenter cohort study.

252 Background: The management of patients with mCRPC has evolved since the introduction of androgen-receptor axis targeted agents (ARATs). The Genitourinary Research Consortium (GURC) initiated a prospective, phase 4, multicentre, non-interventional, longitudinal cohort study of Canadian men with advanced prostate cancer to determine real-world treatment patterns and outcomes. Methods: 25 sites across Canada participated in this study including patients managed by urologists, medical- and radiation-oncologists between 2018 to 2021. Baseline patient characteristics and mCRPC treatment patterns are reported here. Treatment patterns reviewed included time to second-line treatment use and time to progression or death. Results: 136 mCRPC patients were enrolled. Median age was 73 years (range 66 to 80) with 54 (40%) having a Gleason score of &gt;8 at diagnosis. Median PSA at enrollment was 8.9 (2.4 to 25.1) ng/ml. At study entry, 90/132 (66%) patients with mCSPC and 42/132 (31%) patients nmCRPC had progressed to develop mCRPC. One hundred and twenty-one (89%) of patients in this cohort received first-line treatment for mCRPC, the most common was abiraterone acetate + prednisone in 67 (49%) and enzalutamide in 41 (30%), followed by docetaxel in 6 (4.4%), and Radium-223 in 5 (3.7%) patients. During the 25-month median follow-up period (range 6-28), 59 (49%) of the patients receiving first line mCRPC therapy had documented disease progression or death. At the time of last recorded follow-up, 37 (28%) patients who progressed received a second-line therapy for mCRPC. Median time to progression in this cohort was 21 months (95% CI: 15.2 - NE), with ARAT-to-ARAT being the most common sequencing pattern observed in 15 (39%) patients, followed by ARAT to chemotherapy in 14 (37%). Conclusions: In this real-world analysis of mCRPC patients, ARAT therapy was the preferred approach for first-line treatment intensification in over 108 (80%) patients. Despite evidence of poor response rates, ARAT-to-ARAT was the most common sequencing for second line therapy, followed by ARAT-to-chemotherapy treatment. Further analysis and follow-up will help define optimal mCRPC management, in real world setting.