Androgen Deprivation Therapy In Patients Research Articles

A practical guide for assessing and managing cardiovascular risk during androgen-deprivation therapy in patients with prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy among men worldwide, and androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) is a mainstay of treatment. There are observational data demonstrating an increased risk of cardiovascular events in patients who receive ADT, particularly those who have an elevated baseline cardiovascular risk. Because, for most patients with prostate cancer, death is predominantly from noncancer-related causes, cardiovascular disease and its risk factors should be optimized during cancer treatment. This review provides an overview of the landscape of ADT treatment and serves as a guide for appropriate cardiovascular screening and risk-mitigation strategies. The authors emphasize the importance of shared communication between the multidisciplinary cancer team and primary care to improve baseline cardiovascular screening and treatment of modifiable risk factors within this higher risk population.

The effect of dose-escalation radiotherapy with simultaneous-integrated-boost on the use of short-term androgen deprivation therapy in patients with intermediate risk prostate cancer.

To compare the biochemical failure (FFBF) and prostate cancer specific survival (PCSS) rates of patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer (IR-PC) who were treated with 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with 78 Gy to the prostate, those treated with ADT and focal boost (FB) of 86 Gy to intraprostatic lesion (IPL) using the simultaneous-integrated boost (SIB) technique, and those treated with SIB alone. A retrospective analysis of 320 IR-PC patients treated between January 2012 and April 2021 was performed. Patients were divided into three groups based on their treatment arm: 78 + ADT (109 patients, 34.1%), 78/86 (102 patients, 31.8%), and 78/86 + ADT. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to determine prognostic factors for FFBF and PCSS. Median follow-up was 8.8 years. The 8-year FFBF and PCSS rates were 88.6% and 99.0%. Patients who received ADT had significantly higher pretreatment PSA levels and clinical tumor stage. Disease progression occurred in 45 patients (7.3%) at a median of 41.9 months after definitive radiotherapy (RT). Younger age, positive core biopsy (PCB) ≥ 50%, and the absence of ADT were all independent predictors of poor FFBF in multivariate analysis, whereas patients with PCB < 50% who were also given ADT had better PCSS. Patients treated with 78/86 Gy alone had worse FFBF than those treated with 78 Gy and ADT (Hazard ratio [HR] = 3.39 [95% CI = 1.46-7.88]; p = 0.005), as well as than those treated with 78/86 Gy and ADT (HR = 3.21 [95% CI = 1.23-6.46]; p = 0.009). However, FB to IPL has no effect on PCSS in multivariable analysis. There was no significant difference between treatment groups in terms of acute and late Grade ≥2 genitourinary or gastrointestinal toxicity. Our findings demonstrated that patients who received 78/86 alone did worse than patients who received ADT with either 78 or 78/86 Gy. However, because IR-PC patients are so diverse, additional prospective trials are needed to validate our findings.

Bone-Modifying Agents in Patients With High-Risk Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Treated With Abiraterone Acetate

The association between the use of bone-modifying agents (BMAs) and the outcomes among patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) treated with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) remains unclear. To investigate the association between BMA use and the outcomes of patients with mCSPC receiving AAP. In this cohort study, a post hoc analysis of individual participant data from the LATITUDE trial was performed. The LATITUDE trial, a phase 3 randomized clinical trial, aimed to assess the efficacy of AAP and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) vs dual-placebo and ADT in patients with high-risk mCSPC (data cutoff, August 15, 2018). Eligible patients had newly diagnosed prostate cancer with metastases and at least 2 of 3 high-risk factors (Gleason score ≥8, presence of ≥3 lesions on bone scan, or presence of measurable visceral metastasis). The trial was conducted at 235 sites in 34 countries. Data for the present study were evaluated from July 18 to September 23, 2023. Use of BMAs was defined as the administration of bisphosphonates and denosumab within 90 days before and after randomization. The primary outcomes were time to skeletal-related events (SREs) and overall survival (OS). An SRE was defined as a clinical or pathological fracture, spinal cord compression, palliative radiation to bone, or surgery involving bone. Differences in these outcomes were examined using the restricted mean survival time from inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves, estimated until the last event was observed (longest time observed, 63.9 months). Treatment × covariate interactions were analyzed using weighted Cox proportional hazards regression models for the total cohort. In the total cohort of 1199 patients (956 [79.7%] younger than 75 years), 597 (49.8%) received AAP and ADT, including 474 (79.4%) younger than 75 years and 384 (64.3%) with more than 10 bone metastases (AAP cohort); 602 (50.2%) were treated with dual placebo and ADT, including 482 (80.1%) younger than 75 years and 377 (62.6%) with more than 10 bone metastases (ADT cohort). In the AAP cohort, 132 patients (22.1%) received BMAs, while in the ADT cohort, 131 (21.8%) did. Zoledronic acid was the most frequently administered BMA in both the AAP (93 [70.5%]) and the ADT (88 [67.2%]) cohorts. During the median follow-up of 51.8 (IQR, 47.2-57.0) months in the AAP cohort, BMA use was associated with a longer time to SRE (difference, 7.8 [95% CI, 4.2-11.3] months) but not with OS (difference, 1.6 [95% CI, -2.5 to 5.8] months). In the ADT cohort, BMA use was associated with both time to SRE (difference, 9.3 [95% CI, 5.2-13.3] months) and OS (difference, 5.5 [95% CI, 3.2-9.8] months). No evidence was found that the outcomes of BMA varied by AAP or ADT (hazard ratio for time to SRE, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.48-2.08]; P = .99 for interaction; hazard ratio for OS, 1.31 [95% CI, 0.88-1.96]; P = .18 for interaction). The findings of this cohort study suggest that use of BMAs was associated with a longer time to SRE in patients with high-risk mCSPC treated with ADT, with or without AAP, suggesting that BMA use might provide benefits to this population.

Weight variation during androgen deprivation therapy in patients with localized prostate cancer: Data from two prospective randomized trials.

296 Background: In prostate cancer (PCa) treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and radiotherapy (RT), limited prospective data exist regarding weight variation during ADT. Using our prospective data from two phase III trials we compare the magnitude of weight variation during different duration of ADT. Methods: 400 patients (pts) with intermediate risk PCa received 6 months of ADT (Bicalutamide 1 month (m) and Goserelin 10,8 mg x 2), and 630 pts with high-risk PCa were treated with 18 or 36m of ADT (Bicalutamide 1m and Goserelin 10,8 mg x 6 or 12). Pts’ weights were measured at baseline then at each Goserelin dose. 463/1030 pts were excluded from the analysis: 90 no or incomplete ADT, 127 no initial weight and 246 no weight at the end of ADT. Regular patient weighing was available in 567/1030 pts (55%) from whom 250, 191 and 124 received, respectively, 6, 18 or 36m of ADT. Pt’s characteristics and weights were compared with Kruskal-Wallis and Chi squared test between groups of ADT. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess predictors of weight gain over 2 kg. Variables included were duration of ADT, age ≥65 vs. &lt; 65 and baseline comorbidities (cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension). Results: Comparing weights between the beginning and the end of ADT, 375/567 (66.1%) pts gained and 192/567 (33.9%) lost weight. The mean ± SD weight gain at the end of ADT was significantly higher in pts receiving 18m of ADT (1.98 ± 4.05) or 36m (2.38 ± 5.15) compared to pts receiving only 6m (0.98 ± 3.10, p=0.003). As ADT duration increased (6, 18 or 36m), weight gain over 2 kg (34.1% vs. 48.2% vs. 53.2%, p&lt;0.001) and over 4 kg (12.7% vs. 26.2% vs. 36.3%, p&lt;0.001) significantly increased. In multivariable logistic regression, predictors of weight gain over 2 kg were 18m ADT [OR=1.85 (1.25-2.74), p=0.002] and 36m ADT [OR=2.23 (1.43-3.48), p&lt;0.001] compared to 6m ADT and non-diabetic pts (OR=2.13 (1.28-3.54), p=0.003). Age was not a factor. In the 375 pts who gained weight, the rate of patients that gained 0.1 to 2 kg, 2.1 to 4 kg and more than 4 kg were respectively (47.2%, 33.1% and 19.6%) in the 163 receiving 6m ADT, (30.3%, 32.6% and 37.1%) in 132 pts receiving 18m ADT, and (17.6%, 26.3% and 56.4%) in the 80 pts receiving 36m ADT. In the 192 pts who lost weight, the rate of patients that lost 0.1 to 2 kg, 2.1 to 4 kg and more than 4 kg were respectively (62.9%, 21.3% and 15.6%) in 89 receiving 6m ADT, (50.8%, 27.1% and 22.1%) in 59 pts receiving 18m ADT and (59.1%, 15.9% and 25%) in 44 pts receiving 36m ADT. Conclusions: ADT is not associated with weight gain in all pts. Based on our prospective data, one third of pts lose weight at the end of ADT. However, weight gain above 2 kg or 4 kg increases with ADT duration and non-diabetics pts, regardless of age. Weight monitoring in pts receiving ADT should be done regularly and pts counseled accordingly.

Racial and ethnic differences in the receipt of metabolic syndrome risk factor screening and treatment among individuals with prostate cancer treated with androgen deprivation therapy.

29 Background: Racial and ethnic health disparities in prostate cancer screening, and treatment constitute the largest of all cancer disparities. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is widely used in the treatment of localized or metastatic prostate cancer. However, ADT is associated with toxic cardiovascular and metabolic adverse events that may occur as early as 6 months of therapy initiation. This study aimed to assess racial/ethnic differences and longitudinal changes in metabolic syndrome risk factor (MSRF) screening/treatment among patients with prostate cancer treated with ADT at a university-affiliated comprehensive cancer center in the southwestern U.S. between 2010-2021. We also aimed to identify patient and healthcare provider factors that influence MSRF screening among study sample. Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study of 803 patients treated with ADT for at least six months at the cancer center was conducted. Patients were followed three months pre- to 12 months post-ADT initiation to evaluate MSRF screening/treatment. Determination of MSRF screening was based on primary care provider referral for MSRF screening/treatment or receipt of blood glucose, lipid profile, and blood pressure screening within six months post-treatment with ADT. Patients were considered treated for MSRF if they were started or continued therapy (within six months of ADT initiation) with science advisory guideline recommended treatments. Results: Guideline-concordant MSRF screening rate approached 23.5%; MSRF treatment rate was 76.9%. A higher treatment rate in MSRF treatment was found for NHW compared to Hispanic men ( p=0.02). We found a significant difference in the proportion of patients receiving MSRF screening across all racial/ethnic groups ( p=0.03). MSRF screening rates from 13.9% to 35.6% were observed over the 10-year data collection period. Patients with dyslipidemia at baseline had higher odds of having MSRF screening than patients without dyslipidemia ( p&lt;0.0001). Oncologists with &gt;20 years of experience had higher odds of providing MSRF screening compared with &lt;10 years of experience ( p=0.006). Conclusions: Minority populations had significantly lower odds of having MSRF screening than NHW patients after adjusting for clinical and socio-economic variables. Closer clinical attention and education, as well as the development and implementation of innovative practice tools and interventions to optimize MSRF screening and treatment are warranted to mitigate the harmful adverse effects of ADT in patients with prostate cancer.

Rate of hospitalization and length of hospital stay during and post docetaxel for darolutamide in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer using ARASENS.

228 Background: ARASENS was a randomized, double-blind, Phase III trial of darolutamide (daro) + docetaxel + androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) vs. placebo (pbo) + docetaxel + ADT in patients with metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). We sought to compare rates of hospitalizations and length of hospital stay (LoS) per patient due to any reason, and due to adverse events (AE) during or post docetaxel using data from ARASENS. Methods: We used mixed effects negative binomial regression to estimate time-varying rate of hospitalization and LoS by patient. Patients with records that began on the same start date were considered duplicates and were condensed into one visit, using the latest end date. Patients with multiple records with overlapping time periods were combined into one visit. A constant hospitalization rate assumption was considered inappropriate since docetaxel is administered for 6-cycles (~4.14 months). Hospitalizations that began within and after first 4 months of treatment were grouped together. Conversely, LoS was assumed to be time invariant. Results: The first 4 months of treatment (when patients were receiving docetaxel) were associated with increased hospitalization both due to any reason and to AE (Table 1). Daro was associated with a numerical reduction in rate of hospitalization (per year) due to any reason during docetaxel (0.75 days [95% CI: 0.61, 0.88]) vs. pbo (0.91 days [95% CI: 0.75, 1.07]) and after docetaxel (0.31 days [95% CI: 0.26, 0.37]) vs. pbo (0.38 days [95% CI: 0.31, 0.45]). A similar trend was observed for hospitalizations due to AE. Daro was associated with a marginally longer LoS per hospitalization compared with pbo (+1.90 days). Similar results were seen for LoS due to AE (+1.67 days). Conclusions: Daro was associated with a numerically lower rate of hospitalization, but marginally longer LoS compared to pbo. A lower rate of hospitalization was observed post docetaxel as opposed to during docetaxel. Clinical trial information: NCT102799602 . [Table: see text]

Cost-effectiveness of rezvilutamide versus bicalutamide and androgen-deprivation therapy in patients with highvolume, metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.

Background: Rezvilutamide, a novel androgen-receptor inhibitor with limited blood-brain barrier penetration, exhibits significant antitumour activity against highvolume, metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). In this study, we aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of rezvilutamide and bicalutamide as first-line treatments for untreated prostate cancer among Chinese patients, in order to evaluate the efficacy of rezvilutamide. Methods: In this study, we utilized partition survival model to assess the cost-effectiveness of rezvilutamide and bicalutamide treatments for highvolume mHSPC. The model was developed using TreeAge Pro 2022 software and relied on clinical data obtained from the CHART trial. Transition probabilities were estimated from the reported survival probabilities in trials using parametric survival modeling. From the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system, we calculated quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), and lifetime cost. A lifetime horizon and an annual discount rate of 5% were employed. To address modeling uncertainties, we conducted one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Results: The cost of rezvilutamide versus bicalutamide were $62700 and $13200. Rezvilutamide had an ICER of $41900 per additional QALYs gained compared with bicalutamide. Research indicated that rezvilutamide achieved at least an 28.20% probability of cost-effectiveness at the threshold of $38223.34/QALY. One-way sensitivity analysis revealed that the results were sensitive to utility of PD. Scenario analysis showed that rezvilutamide was cost-effectiveness if its price was reduced by more than 10%. Conclusion: Based on the analysis at the current price, rezvilutamide was found to be less cost-effective for patients with highvolume mHSPC compared to bicalutamide in China.

Apalutamide versus bicalutamide in combination with androgen deprivation therapy for metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer

The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of apalutamide and bicalutamide in combination with androgen deprivation therapy in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). We retrospectively collected the data of about 330 patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer at our hospital and affiliated hospitals between December 2013 and August 2023. Sixty-one patients were administered apalutamide (240 mg/day) with androgen deprivation therapy (group A), and 269 patients were administered bicalutamide (80 mg/day) with androgen deprivation therapy (group B). Propensity score matching was used to adjust for clinical background factors between the two groups. PSA progression-free survival and overall survival were significantly longer in group A than in group B among the matched patients. Apalutamide therapy was a significant independent factor for OS in matched patients. The second progression-free survival of group A was significantly longer than that of group B in matched patients. Patients treated with apalutamide achieved ≥ 90% PSA decline from baseline faster and in larger numbers than those with bicalutamide. Apalutamide combined with ADT may be superior to bicalutamide alone in terms of OS and PSA-PFS in patients with mHSPC.

Comparative effectiveness of multiple androgen receptor signaling inhibitor medicines with androgen deprivation therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: a study in the real world.

The current treatment strategy for metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer (mHSPC) is the combination of Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitors (ARSIs) medicines with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). However, there is a lack of real-world data comparing the efficacy of different ARSI pharmaceuticals. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of bicalutamide, abiraterone, enzalutamide, and apalutamide in combination with ADT for patients with mHSPC. We retrospectively analyzed 82 patients diagnosed with mHSPC, including 18 patients treated with abiraterone acetate with prednisone, 21 patients with enzalutamide, 20 patients with apalutamide, and 23 patients with bicalutamide. We evaluated PSA progression-free survival (PSA-PFS), imaging progression-free survival (r PFS), castration resistance progression-free survival (CRPC-PFS), and overall survival (OS) using Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. Additionally, we explored relevant factors affecting prognosis through univariate and multivariate Cox risk-proportionality models. PSA response rates at 3, 6, and 12 months, nadir PSA levels (nPSA), and time to nadir (TTN) in different medication subgroups after treatment were documented, and we used one-way ANOVA to determine the effect of these measures on patient prognosis. In comparison with bicalutamide, both enzalutamide and apalutamide have shown significant advantages in delaying disease progression among mHSPC patients. Specifically, enzalutamide has been found to significantly prolong PSA-PFS (HR 2.244; 95% CI 1.366-3.685, p=0.001), rPFS (HR 2.539; 95% CI 1.181-5.461; p= 0.007), CRPC-PFS (HR 2.131; 95% CI 1.295-3.506; p= 0.003), and OS (HR 2.06; 95% CI 1.183-3.585; P=0.005). Similarly, apalutamide has significantly extended PSA-PFS (HR 5.071; 95% CI 1.711-15.032; P= 0.003) and CRPC-PFS (HR 6.724; 95% CI 1.976-22.878; P=0.002) among patients. On the other hand, the use of abiraterone in combination with ADT did not demonstrate a significant advantage in delaying diseases progression when compared with the other three agents in mHSPC patients. There were no significant differences in overall adverse event rates among the four pharmaceuticals in terms of safety. Additionally, the observation of PSA kinetics revealed that enzalutamide, apalutamide, and abiraterone acetate had a significant advantage in achieving deep PSA response (PSA ≤ 0.2 ng/ml) compared with bicalutamide (p=0.007 at 12 months). Enzalutamide and apalutamide exhibited preeminence efficacy, with no substantial difference observed between the two medications. Abiraterone, enzalutamide, and apalutamide were found to significantly reduce and stabilize PSA levels in mHSPC patients more quickly and thoroughly than bicalutamide. Furthermore, enzalutamide and apalutamide were found to significantly prolong survival and delay disease progression in mHSPC patients compared with bicalutamide. It should be noted that abiraterone did not demonstrate a significant advantage in delaying disease compared with enzalutamide and apalutamide. After conducting drug toxicity analyses, it was determined that there were no significant differences among the four drugs.

P024 - A randomized Phase 3 trial of Metformin in patients initiating androgen deprivation therapy as PRevention and Intervention of MEtabolic syndrome: The PRIME Study

P024 - A randomized Phase 3 trial of Metformin in patients initiating androgen deprivation therapy as PRevention and Intervention of MEtabolic syndrome: The PRIME Study

Quality of life comparison based on testosterone recovery after androgen deprivation therapy in patients cured from high-risk prostate cancer: Long term data from a phase III trial.

333 Background: Using data from a randomized Phase III trial and based on testosterone recovery after androgen suppression therapy (ADT), we compared quality of life (QOL) between patients (pts) considered cured of high-risk prostate cancer (HRPC). Methods: 630 pts with HRPC were randomised to pelvic and prostate radiotherapy plus either 36 or 18 months (m) of ADT (10-2000 / 01-2008). Serum testosterone (T) was measured at baseline then at each visit. Abnormal T was defined as below the normal level. We considered cured pts those with a PSA nadir &lt; 2 ng/ml, QOL was assessed by the validated EORTC30 (30 items). Patient-reported outcomes were filled out before treatments, every 6 m during ADT, 4 m after ADT and then once a year for 5 years. The 30 items were regrouped into 9 scales. All items and scales scores were linearly transformed to a 0-100 points scale. We analysed all items and scales scores with general linear model and repeated measures to evaluate changes between pts who did versus those who did not recover normal levels of T over time. Effect of T recovery was adjusted in multivariable model including age, initial normal/abnormal T and ADT duration (18 or 36 m). P-value &lt; 0.01 was considered statistically significant to account for multiple comparisons and a difference in mean scores of ≥ 10 points was considered clinically relevant. Results: We selected those pts considered cured to avoid subsequent T variations due to reintroduction of ADT for recurrence. We excluded 361 pts: not receiving exactly 18 or 36 m of ADT (63), survival &lt; 1 year (15), no T measured at baseline or during follow-up (55), biochemical failure (105) or evidence of metastatic/recurrent disease (92), no QOL questionnaire (31). 269 pts were retained for the analysis. With a median follow-up of 14 years, 140/269 (52%) pts recovered T to a normal level: 94/166 (56.6%) in 18 m and 46/103 (44.7%) in 36 m ADT, p=0.056. Among pts regaining a normal T, the median time to recovery was 3 years (IQR: 2.5 to 3.6) for 18 m vs. 5 years (IQR: 4.5 to 6.0) for 36 m, p&lt;0.001. The global adherence to QOL questionnaires was 83.9% (2649/3156) and it was higher for 36m than for 18 m [86.4% (1255/1452) vs. 81.8% (1394/1704) p&lt;0.001]. When comparing EORTC30 between pts who recovered with those who did not recover T, pts with T recovery had a better QOL: 15/30 items and 6/9 scales were statistically significant principally scale and items related to physical, role, emotional, fatigue, pain, dyspnoea, insomnia, diarrhoea, and financial difficulties. 2 items were also clinically relevant, trouble to take a long walk and feeling tense. Conclusions: In pts cured from HRPC, T recovery is associated with a betterQOL. 18 m of ADT should be the preferred duration since a significantly faster and a higher proportion of pts recover a normal T level with the shorter schedule without detriment in long term outcomes, as previously reported.

Treatment Results of High-dose-rate Brachytherapy and External Beam Radiation With Long-term Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

A recent clinical trial indicated the usefulness of local radiation therapy of the prostate in patients with low-volume metastatic prostate cancer. High-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) is used mainly for high-risk, localized, and locally advanced cases. However, few studies exist on the efficacy of HDR-BT and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for metastatic prostate cancer. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 39 patients diagnosed with regional lymph node metastasis and/or a limited number of metastases who underwent HDR-BT and EBRT with long-term androgen deprivation therapy. We utilized Cox's proportional hazards models to identify predictors of oncological outcomes. Treatment outcomes, including biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS), clinical progression-free survival (CPFS), and castration-resistant prostate cancer-free survival (CRPCFS), were compared according to the clinical stage. The median follow-up duration was 49 months (range=23-136 months). The 5-year BCRFS, CPFS, CRPCFS, and cancer-specific survival rates were 62.2%, 67.2%, 83.2%, and 93.4%, respectively. Based on Kaplan-Meier analysis, N1M0 and N0-1M1b showed favorable outcomes compared with N1M1a. Multivariate analysis revealed that N1M1a prostate cancer was an independent risk factor for poor BCRFS, CPFS, and CRPCFS. HDR-BT and EBRT with androgen deprivation therapy is a feasible approach for patients with newly diagnosed regional and low-metastatic-burden prostate cancer. However, in our cohort M1a prostate cancer had significantly inferior outcomes. A well-controlled prospective study is imperative to confirm our results.

Neoadjuvant Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitors before Radical Prostatectomy for Non-Metastatic Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.

(1) Background: Several phase II studies, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), assessed the efficacy of adding androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) as a neoadjuvant treatment in patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PCa). Summarizing the early results of these studies could help in designing phase III trials and patient counseling. (2) Methods: We queried three databases in January 2023 for studies that included PCa patients treated with neoadjuvant ARSI-based combination therapy before RP. The outcomes of interest were oncologic outcomes and pathologic responses, such as pathologic complete response (pCR) and minimal residual disease (MRD). (3) Results: Overall, twenty studies (eight RCTs) were included in this systematic review. Compared to ADT or ARSI alone, ARSI + ADT was associated with higher pCR and MRD rates; this effect was less evident when adding a second ARSI or chemotherapy. Nevertheless, ARSI + ADT resulted in relatively low pCR rates (0-13%) with a high proportion of ypT3 (48-90%) in the resected specimen. PTEN loss, ERG positive, or intraductal carcinoma seem to be associated with worse pathologic response. One study that adjusted for the effects of possible confounders reported that neoadjuvant ARSI + ADT improved time to biochemical recurrence and metastasis-free survival compared to RP alone. (4) Conclusions: Neoadjuvant ARSI + ADT combination therapy results in improved pathologic response compared to either alone or none in patients with non-metastatic advanced PCa. Ongoing phase III RCTs with long-term oncologic outcomes, as well as biomarker-guided studies, will clarify the indication, oncologic benefits, and adverse events of ARSI + ADT in patients with clinically and biologically aggressive PCa.

A phase 2 randomized open-label study of oral darolutamide monotherapy vs. androgen deprivation therapy in men with hormone-naive prostate cancer (EORTC-GUCG 1532).

160 Background: Darolutamide is androgen-receptor (AR) inhibitor with low blood–brain barrier penetration and limited potential for clinically relevant drug–drug interactions. Darolutamide has been shown to increase overall survival in combination with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (PC) and, in combination with docetaxel, in men with non-metastatic castration resistant PC. This phase 2 study assessed the efficacy and safety of DARO as a monotherapy without ADT in patients with non-castrate testosterone (T) levels (≥230 ng/dL). Methods: This was a 24-wk, open-label, randomized study of patients with hormone-naïve, histologically confirmed prostate cancer (all stages, with a max of 4 metastatic lesions) requiring hormonal treatment, an ECOG PS score of 0, and a life expectancy &gt;1 y. All patients received DARO 600 mg bid or commercially available LHRH analogue. The primary endpoint is PSA response defined as a ≥ 80% decline at week 24 relative to baseline, in the DARO study arm. The ADT arm is used as an internal control. Secondary endpoints included changes in T levels, safety/tolerability, and quality of life. Results: Among 61 men enrolled, the median (range) age was 72 y (53-86y); 49.2% had metastases; 14.8% and 62.3% had undergone prostatectomy or radiotherapy before study entry. The median (range) of PSA at baseline was 8.9 ng/mL (2.2-333.8). In the DARO arm, the evaluable population with available PSA values at baseline and week 24 consisted of 21 patients. The PSA response rate (&gt;80% PSA decline at wk 24) was 100%, with a median (range) decrease of -99.6% (-94.3, -100) at wk 24 in the DARO arm. Serum T levels increased by a median (range) of 43.4% (5.7-144.0) at wk 24, compared with baseline. In the DARO arm, 45.2% of men reported drug-related AEs (mostly Grade 1 or 2). Most frequent treatment-emergent AEs included gynaecomastia (19.4%), fatigue (12.9%), and hot flush (12.9%). 3.1% of men experienced SAEs, none of which were drug related. HR-QoL measures and ADT arm results will be presented as internal reference. Conclusions: DARO monotherapy (600 mg bid) was associated with significant PSA response in nearly all men with hormone-naïve prostate cancer. Testosterone level changes and most common AEs (gynecomastica, fatigue and hot flush) were consistent with potent AR inhibition. Clinical trial information: NCT02972060 .

Major adverse cardiovascular events after androgen deprivation therapy in patients with prostate cancer with hypercholesterolemia.

348 Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) may experience major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). It is unclear how much of MACE is caused by ADT itself. High cholesterol has been associated with lower MACE risk in older men, not on statin therapy. This study evaluates MACE risk after ADT initiation for patients with and without hypercholesterolemia using real-world data. Methods: US electronic medical records (2010-2020) of PCa patients (n=45,059) receiving LHRH agonist/antagonist injections were analyzed to calculate the risk of MACE since ADT initiation in patients with and without hypercholesterolemia. Hypercholesterolemia was defined as having taken hypercholesterolemia medication or diagnosis with hypercholesterolemia prior to the first MACE event after ADT start. Exclusion criteria included lack of ADT initiation date or MACE within six months prior to ADT initiation. MACE was defined as myocardial infarction, stroke, and death from any cause. Kaplan-Meier event-free survival curves and cox regression were used to compare MACE risk between patients with and without hypercholesterolemia. Results: The dataset contained 178,388 LHRH injection entries and 7,681 MACE. MACE risk was only 1.8% lower (19.0% vs 20.8%) after 4 years for patients with hypercholesterolemia compared to those without (across 10 years, unadjusted: HR=0.88, 95% CI [0.83, 0.92] and adjusted: HR=0.85, 95% CI [0.77, 0.94]). Conclusions: Patients with hypercholesterolemia appear to have slightly lower MACE rates. This may be due to the use of statins, which can reduce the incidence of CV events in a general population. Our analysis of data over the most recent decade from ~45,000 PCa patients is likely an accurate reflection of the real world. Clinicians should monitor PCa patients with underlying CV risk factors and help educate them on lifestyle changes that could impact treatment outcomes.

Intermittent Androgen Deprivation for Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer: First Do No Harm

Intermittent androgen deprivation therapy in patients with prostate cancer and biochemical relapse does not prolong survival or improve quality of life.

Mapping European Association of Urology Guideline Practice Across Europe: An Audit of Androgen Deprivation Therapy Use Before Prostate Cancer Surgery in 6598 Cases in 187 Hospitals Across 31 European Countries

BackgroundEvidence-practice gaps exist in urology. We previously surveyed European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines for strong recommendations underpinned by high-certainty evidence that impact patient experience for which practice variations were suspected. The recommendation “Do not offer neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) before surgery for patients with prostate cancer” was prioritised for further investigation. ADT before surgery is neither clinically effective nor cost effective and has serious side effects. The first step in improving implementation problems is to understand their extent. A clear picture of practice regarding ADT before surgery across Europe is not available. ObjectiveTo assess current ADT use before prostate cancer surgery in Europe. Design, setting, and participantsThis was an observational cross-sectional study. We retrospectively audited recent ADT practices in a multicentre international setting. We used nonprobability purposive sampling, aiming for breadth in terms of low- versus high-volume, academic, versus community and public versus private centres. Outcome measurements and statistical analysisOur primary outcome was adherence to the ADT recommendation. Descriptive statistics and a multilevel model were used to investigate differences between countries across different factors (volume, centre type, and funding type). Subgroup analyses were performed for patients with low, intermediate, and high risk, and for those with locally advanced prostate cancer. We also collected reasons for nonadherence. Results and limitationsWe included 6598 patients with prostate cancer from 187 hospitals in 31 countries from January 1, 2017 to May 1, 2020. Overall, nonadherence was 2%, (range 0–32%). Most of the variability was found in the high-risk subgroup, for which nonadherence was 4% (range 0–43%). Reasons for nonadherence included attempts to improve oncological outcomes or preoperative tumour parameters; attempts to control the cancer because of long waiting lists; and patient preference (changing one’s mind from radiotherapy to surgery after neoadjuvant ADT had commenced or feeling that the side effects were intolerable). Although we purposively sampled for variety within countries (public/private, academic/community, high/low-volume), a selection bias toward centres with awareness of guidelines is possible, so adherence rates may be overestimated. ConclusionsEAU guidelines recommend against ADT use before prostate cancer surgery, yet some guideline-discordant ADT use remains at the cost of patient experience and an additional payer and provider burden. Strategies towards discontinuation of inappropriate preoperative ADT use should be pursued. Patient summaryAndrogen deprivation therapy (ADT) is sometimes used in men with prostate cancer who will not benefit from it. ADT causes side effects such as weight gain and emotional changes and increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and osteoporosis. Guidelines strongly recommend that men opting for surgery should not receive ADT, but it is unclear how well the guidance is followed. We asked urologists across Europe how patients in their institutions were treated over the past few years. Most do not use ADT before surgery, but this still happens in some places. More research is needed to help doctors to stop using ADT in patients who will not benefit from it.

Cost-Utility Analysis of Darolutamide Combined with Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Patients with High-Risk Non-Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer in China.

The increasing incidence of prostate cancer (PC) in China leads to a significant disease burden. Although three novel androgen inhibitors (darolutamide, apalutamide, and enzalutamide) have been approved for patients with high-risk non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC), the economic evaluation of these novel treatments in China remains unknown. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the cost-utility of darolutamide combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), comparing with apalutamide + ADT and enzalutamide + ADT, in patients with high-risk nmCRPC from a healthcare system perspective in China. A partitioned survival model was developed to capture time spent by patients in three health states: nmCRPC, metastatic CRPC (mCRPC), and death. Clinical outcomes from the ARAMIS, PROSPER, and SPARTAN studies were obtained. In the absence of head-to-head studies, indirect treatment comparisons were conducted to capture the comparative effectiveness between darolutamide + ADT, apalutamide + ADT, and enzalutamide + ADT. The prices of apalutamide and enzalutamide were assumed to be the same as the initial launch price of darolutamide, since post-negotiation prices after national reimbursement drug list (NRDL) inclusion remain confidential. Other health resources costs, baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, and utility were collected through literature or clinical expert interviews. Selected sensitivity analyses were also performed. For a 20-year time horizon, darolutamide + ADT was associated with lower cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) than apalutamide + ADT and enzalutamide + ADT (202,897 Chinese yuan (CNY)/QALY vs. 228,998CNY/QALY and 221,409CNY/QALY, respectively) (exchange rate, 1USD = 6.7871CNY). Darolutamide + ADT had better health outcomes and lower total costs compared to both apalutamide + ADT (+ 0.22QALYs and - 72,818CNY) and enzalutamide + ADT (+ 0.09QALYs and - 67,451CNY). Across the modelled sensitivity analyses (including hazard ratios and drug costs), darolutamide + ADT remained dominant or cost-effective. This economic evaluation suggested that, in comparison with apalutamide + ADT and enzalutamide + ADT, darolutamide + ADT was a dominant or cost-effective treatment option for patients with high-risk nmCRPC in China.

Metastasis-directed Therapy Without Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Solitary Oligorecurrent Prostate Cancer.

As controversy remains regarding the role of metastasis-directed therapy in patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer, we sought to characterize outcomes of metastasis-directed therapy without concomitant androgen deprivation therapy in the specific subset of patients with a solitary metastatic lesion on C-11 choline positron emission tomography imaging whose primary tumor has already been treated. We identified 124 consecutive prostate cancer patients from 2008 to 2018 with a solitary oligorecurrent metastatic lesion on positron emission tomography imaging who were treated with metastasis-directed therapy without androgen deprivation therapy from the Mayo Clinic C-11 choline registry. Metastasis-directed therapy consisted of either stereotactic body radiation therapy or surgical excision. Of these 124 patients, 67 were treated with surgery (median follow-up 54 months) and 57 patients were treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (median follow-up 53 months). Of patients treated with surgery, 80.5% had &gt;50% decline in prostate specific antigen at first follow-up, and the 3-year radiographic progression-free survival was 29%. Median time to initiation of systemic therapy in this cohort was 18.5 months (interquartile range 8.4-44.7 months). Meanwhile, for patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy, 40.3% had &gt;50% decline in prostate specific antigen at first follow-up, and the 3-year radiographic progression-free survival was 17%. Similarly, median time to initiation of systemic therapy was 17.8 months (interquartile range 7.1-42.3 months). This study represents the first reported series of metastasis-directed therapy without androgen deprivation therapy in patients with solitary oligorecurrent metastatic prostate cancer. These results suggest that metastasis-directed therapy without androgen deprivation therapy can delay initiation of systemic therapy and highlight the need for further prospective study for select patients with solitary metastatic recurrences of prostate cancer.

GETUG-AFU 22 Phase II Randomized Trial Evaluating Outcomes of Post-Operative Immediate Salvage Radiation Therapy with or without ADT for Patients with Persistently Elevated PSA Level

<h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3> Radical prostatectomy (RP) is one of the recommended option for localized prostate cancer (PCa) treatment but no clear recommendations guide post-operative treatment patients with persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after RP. The aim of this trial was to compare immediate salvage radiation therapy (iSRT) with or without short-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in these patients. <h3>Materials/Methods</h3> RP patients with nonmetastatic PCa on conventional preoperative imaging, and with a post-RP PSA level between 0.2 and 2 ng/mL were randomized (1:1) to iSRT alone (iSRT arm) or 6 months of ADT (degarelix) with iSRT (iSRT+ADT arm). ISRT consisted of pelvic irradiation (46 Gy in 23 Fr) with a boost on the prostate bed (66 Gy in 33 Fr). The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). Biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), metastates-free survival (MFS), overall survival (OS), quality of life, and toxicities were evaluated as secondary endpoints. <h3>Results</h3> From Jan-2013 to Sept-2015, 125 pts were included (iSRT arm: 64 pts; iSRT+ADT arm: 61). Median follow up was 75.0 months (95% CI: 74.1-76.6). The baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the two arms. Median PSA was 0.6 ng/mL (0.12-3.65) at randomization. All patients received the planned iSRT and 98.4% in the arm iSRT+ADT received ADT as planned. The efficacy results were analyzed at 5 years. EFS was 62.3% (95% CI: 48.9-73.2) in iSRT arm and 63.5% (95% CI: 49.9-74.2) in iSRT+ADT arm (HR=0.83; 95%CI: 0.47-1.47; p=0.528). bPFS was 62.3% (95% CI: 48.9-73.2) in iSRT arm and 66% (95% CI: 52.3-76.6) in iSRT+ADT arm (HR=0.76; 95%CI: 0.44-1.31; p=0.322). MFS was in favor of the iSRT+ADT arm with HR=0.51 (95% CI: 0.26-0.99; p=0.048). OS data were not mature at the time of analysis. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that PSA level <0.6 ng/ml at randomization and tumor ≤pT3a were associated with increased bPFS (HR=1.84; 95%CI: 1.02-3.33; p=0.05 and HR=2.96; 95%CI: 1.66-5.25; p=0.0002, respectively). PSA level <0.6 ng/ml at randomization was associated with improved MFS (HR=2.82; 95%CI: 1.14-6.95; p=0.019). No grade 4 toxicities were observed. Overall, no difference in acute toxicity were observed between the 2 arms and more late toxicities (≥6 months after iSRT) were observed in the iSRT+ADT than the iSRT arm (53.1% vs 70.5%; p=0.046). At 12 months ADT-related symptoms were more important in the iSRT+ADT arm (QLQ-PR25; p=0.04). At 24 months, no difference in QLQ-C30 or QLQ-PR25 analysis was reported. After an initial 25-fold decrease in blood testosterone level, all patients recovered to normal level 12 months after starting ADT. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Despite the lack of differences in terms of EFS between the two arms, this study demonstrated that iSRT+ADT improved MFS without impaired quality-of-life for patients with persistently elevated PSA after RP.