And/or Androgen Deprivation Therapy Research Articles

MP57-19 VALIDATION OF PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN DOUBLING TIME KINETICS FOLLOWING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY TO GUIDE ACTIVE OBSERVATION AND INTERVENTION

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 May 2022MP57-19 VALIDATION OF PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN DOUBLING TIME KINETICS FOLLOWING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY TO GUIDE ACTIVE OBSERVATION AND INTERVENTION Erica Huang, Linda My Huynh, Adam Gordon, Ryan Chandhoke, Blanca Morales, Douglas Skarecky, Joshua Tran, and Thomas Ahlering Erica HuangErica Huang More articles by this author , Linda My HuynhLinda My Huynh More articles by this author , Adam GordonAdam Gordon More articles by this author , Ryan ChandhokeRyan Chandhoke More articles by this author , Blanca MoralesBlanca Morales More articles by this author , Douglas SkareckyDouglas Skarecky More articles by this author , Joshua TranJoshua Tran More articles by this author , and Thomas AhleringThomas Ahlering More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002640.19AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Biochemical recurrence (BCR) following radical prostatectomy (RP) has limited ability to predict metastatic progression or prostate cancer specific mortality (PCSM). In our experience, a significant number of men with BCR have non-lethal BCR that can be safely observed based on PSA doubling time (DT) and subsequent DT change without radiation (RT) and/or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). The present study seeks to validate the use of DT kinetics to direct active observation (AO) and intervention. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of 1864 men who underwent RP between June 2002 and September 2019 was conducted. Patients were assessed for treatment intervention (RT and/or ADT) versus AO with DT kinetics. Our main outcome was the predictive value of multivariate regression models for no treatment via ROC analysis. Secondary outcomes were PCSM via Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: 407/1864 (21.8%) men experienced BCR (PSA >0.2 ng/dl, x2), with median follow-up of 7.6 years (IQR 3.3-11.9) (Table 1). In multivariable analysis, DT >12 months (OR: 8.93, 95%CI: 4.53, 17.6) and increasing DT (OR: 5.49, 95%CI: 2.81, 10.71) were significant predictors for continued observation without treatment (p <0.001), while pGGG, p-stage, age, and preoperative PSA were not. This model was an excellent predictor for continued no treatment (AUC=0.83). No patients with DT >12 months, increasing DT experienced PCSM (Figure 1). CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, one third of patients with BCR were observed without RT and/or ADT, with 0% PCSM at mean 7.6 years follow-up. DT >12 months and increasing DT were excellent predictors of no need for treatment. We introduce PSA kinetics as a means for guiding need and/or no need for treatment intervention. Source of Funding: N/A © 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 207Issue Supplement 5May 2022Page: e989 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Erica Huang More articles by this author Linda My Huynh More articles by this author Adam Gordon More articles by this author Ryan Chandhoke More articles by this author Blanca Morales More articles by this author Douglas Skarecky More articles by this author Joshua Tran More articles by this author Thomas Ahlering More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...

Sexual rehabilitation recommendations for prostate cancer survivors and their partners from a biopsychosocial Prostate Cancer Supportive Care Program.

This study aimed to highlight the biopsychosocial recommendations provided to prostate cancer survivors and their partners during sexual rehabilitation. Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained patient database was conducted for visits between 2013 and 2019. The sexual health rehabilitation action plan (SHRAP) is a standardized 29-item list of biopsychosocial recommendations. The frequency of biopsychosocial recommendations provided to patients via their SHRAPs was assessed. Among 913 patients, across 2671 appointments, nearly 74% of patients underwent radical prostatectomy. Other treatments included combination therapy (surgery, radiation, and/or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)) (13%), radiation (external beam radiation or brachytherapy) (5%), and active surveillance (2%). Each patient had a median of 2 (SD 2.06) appointments and received a mean of 10.0 (SD 3.9) recommendations at each visit. Educational recommendations (penile rehabilitation, orgasmic guidelines, and climacturia management) were provided in 84% of visits followed by psychosexual recommendations (pleasure-focused, dedicated time, simmering, sexual aids, and sensate focus) in 71% of all appointments. The top recommendations (total n, frequency of recommendation) were penile rehabilitation (2253, 84%), pleasure-focus (1887, 71%), phosphodiesterase inhibitors (1655, 62%), clinical counselor (1603, 60%), vacuum erectile device (1418, 53%) and intracavernosal injections (1383, 52%). Biopsychosocial programs are evolving to be a key part of prostate cancer survivorship. This study's insight suggests that prostate cancer survivors require education around their sexual consequences and psychosexual counseling alongside proven biomedical strategies for erectile dysfunction. Cancer survivorship programs should integrate educational and psychosocial strategies alongside biological strategies for prostate cancer survivors and their partners.

Prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer is a complex disease that affects millions of men globally, predominantly in high human development index regions. Patients with localized disease at a low to intermediate risk of recurrence generally have a favourable outcome of 99% overall survival for 10 years if the disease is detected and treated at an early stage. Key genetic alterations include fusions of TMPRSS2 with ETS family genes, amplification of the MYC oncogene, deletion and/or mutation of PTEN and TP53 and, in advanced disease, amplification and/or mutation of the androgen receptor (AR). Prostate cancer is usually diagnosed by prostate biopsy prompted by a blood test to measure prostate-specific antigen levels and/or digital rectal examination. Treatment for localized disease includes active surveillance, radical prostatectomy or ablative radiotherapy as curative approaches. Men whose disease relapses after prostatectomy are treated with salvage radiotherapy and/or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for local relapse, or with ADT combined with chemotherapy or novel androgen signalling-targeted agents for systemic relapse. Advanced prostate cancer often progresses despite androgen ablation and is then considered castration-resistant and incurable. Current treatment options include AR-targeted agents, chemotherapy, radionuclides and the poly(ADP-ribose) inhibitor olaparib. Current research aims to improve prostate cancer detection, management and outcomes, including understanding the fundamental biology at all stages of the disease.

Current Treatment Modalities Targeting Tumor Microenvironment in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is responsible for significant cancer-related morbidity and mortality following local treatment failure in men. The initial stages of PCa are typically managed with a combination of surgical resection and/or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Unfortunately, a significant proportion of PCa continues to progress despite being at castrate levels of testosterone (<50ng/dl), at which point it is coined castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). In recent years, many novel therapeutics and drug combinations have been created for CRPC patients. These include immune checkpoint inhibitors, chemokine receptor antagonists, steroidogenic enzyme inhibition, and novel tyrosine kinase inhibitors as well as combinations of drugs. The selection of the most appropriate therapy depends on several factors like stage of the disease, age of the patient, metastasis, functional status, and response towards previous therapies. Here, we review the current state of the literature regarding treatment modalities, focusing on the treatment recommendations per the American Urological Association (AUA), recent clinical trials, and their limitations. An accurate and reliable overview of the strengths and limitations of PCa therapeutics could also allow personalized therapeutic interventions against PCa.

The management of sexual dysfunction resulting from radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy to treat prostate cancer: A comparison of uro-oncology practice according to disease stage.

To establish current uro-oncology practice in the management of sexual dysfunction (SD) following radiotherapy (RT) and/or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to treat prostate cancer. To identify differences in approach to the management of SD according to disease stage. A 14-question mixed methods survey was designed to assess the current UK practice. Closed- and open-ended questions were used to quantify results while allowing participants to expand on answers. The survey was distributed to members of the British Uro-Oncology Group at the 2019 annual meeting. Surveys were completed by 63 uro-oncologists attending the annual meeting of the British Uro-Oncology Group (response rate 66%). The major issue highlighted was a difference in approach to managing SD according to disease stage. More than half of the participants (56%) said 'advanced stage of disease' was a barrier to discussing SD. Clinicians were less likely to discuss SD, take baseline assessments, refer to a specialist clinic or offer rehabilitation when dealing with patients with advanced disease. Only a minority said that the management of SD was primarily their responsibility (11%). Nearly all clinicians (92%) had access to SD clinics; however, the majority of clinicians did not routinely refer patients. This study shows that men with advanced prostate cancer need better support in managing SD. Patients receiving long-term ADT are less likely to be offered any kind of help or intervention. Specific guidance on managing SD in this cohort may result in improvements in sexual function, emotional well-being, quality of life, mental health and confidence.

HoSAGE: Sarcopenia in Older Patients before and after Treatment with Androgen Deprivation Therapy and Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer.

Sarcopenia is a muscle disease defined by a loss of muscle strength associated to a decrease in skeletal muscle mass. In addition to aging, many factors may contribute to sarcopenia as cancer and/or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). The aims of this study are to describe the prevalence of sarcopenia in older prostate cancer patients before initiation of treatment with ADT and radiotherapy, and to evaluate the impact of ADT on the occurrence or aggravation of sarcopenia in this population. longitudinal study. Sarcopenia was prospectively evaluated in 31 consecutive patients aged 70 to 88 years, referred in one hospital unit of south eastern France, for a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) before cancer treatment initiation. CGA, measures of muscle strength and physical performances were performed at baseline (T0) and at the end of cancer treatment (T1). Appendicular skeletal muscle mass was measured by Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the end of treatment. At T0, 8 patients (among 31) had a probable sarcopenia according to European consensus, and 18 had altered physical performance. At T1, 15 patients (among 19) had abnormal one leg balance test. Finally, only one patient had a sarcopenia confirmed by DXA. This preliminary study showed a high prevalence of muscle disorders before initiation of ADT in a population of elderly cancer prostate patients with intermediate frailty status, and an increased risk of falls at the end of ADT. This highlighted the importance of screening for sarcopenia before treatment initiation, to prevent the occurrence or aggravation of sarcopenia by possible adjustment of treatment, and implementation of appropriate exercise and nutrition interventions.

Clinical and Histopathological Characteristics of Prostate Cancer Patients Taken to Palliative Transurethral Prostate Resection.

IntroductionIn prostate cancer (PCa) patients who have been treated with radiotherapy and/or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), palliative transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is a management option in the presence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). The present work seeks to describe the clinical and histopathological characteristics of patients with PCa taken to palliative TURP.MethodsAn observational, descriptive and retrospective study of patients with PCa who underwent palliative TURP for the relief of obstructive urinary symptoms at an oncology reference center between January 2006 and June 2014 was performed. Among the included patients were those with localized PCa treated with radiotherapy and those with advanced PCa with or without metastasis who had previously received ADT.ResultsSixty-six patients with a diagnosis of PCa taken to palliative RTUP were identified. Fifty patients (78.4%) were received some type of ADT, seven patients (10.7%) received curative radiotherapy along with adjuvant ADT, five patients (7.8%) were previously treated with only radiotherapy, and two patients (3.1 %) had received no prior management and thus were taken to bilateral orchiectomy along with palliative TURP in a single surgical act. With regard to the pathology reports, tumor tissue was found in 50 patients (76%), and no tumor was observed in the remaining 16 patients (24%). In one case (1.5%), the Gleason score (GS) could not be determined due to the effects of orchiectomy. Under-staging in the grade group was evidenced in 23 patients (46.9%), over-staging in three patients (6.3%), and no difference in 23 patients (46.9%), when compared to the initial GS at biopsy. The mortality rate and the incidence of TURP syndrome were low (3.1% and 1.5%, respectively). A 46% reduction in the mean serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value was documented when the preoperative and postoperative values were compared.ConclusionA decrease in the serum PSA levels was observed after palliative TURP, and despite having received ADT, it was possible to determine tumor pathology in the resected tissue, being able to identify a greater grade group compared the GS at the time of diagnosis. The palliative TURP proved to be a safe procedure to relieve LUTS in patients with advanced PCa, with a low morbidity and mortality rate.

Low dose rate prostate brachytherapy.

Low dose rate (LDR) prostate brachytherapy is an evidence based radiation technique with excellent oncologic outcomes. By utilizing direct image guidance for radioactive source placement, LDR brachytherapy provides superior radiation dose escalation and conformality compared to external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). With this level of precision, late grade 3 or 4 genitourinary or gastrointestinal toxicity rates are typically between 1% and 4%. Furthermore, when performed as a same day surgical procedure, this technique provides a cost effective and convenient strategy. A large body of literature with robust follow-up has led multiple expert consensus groups to endorse the use of LDR brachytherapy as an appropriate management option for all risk groups of non-metastatic prostate cancer. LDR brachytherapy is often effective when delivered as a monotherapy, although for some patients with intermediate or high-risk disease, optimal outcome are achieved in combination with supplemental EBRT and/or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). In addition to reviewing technical aspects and reported clinical outcomes of LDR prostate brachytherapy, this article will focus on the considerations related to appropriate patient selection and other aspects of its use in the treatment of prostate cancer.

Five-year effectiveness of low-dose-rate brachytherapy: comparisons with nomogram predictions in patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer presenting significant control of intra- and periprostatic disease.

PurposeTo assess the effectiveness of low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy in patients with localized prostate cancer and to compare the outcome with predictions from Kattan and Partin nomograms at 60 months after seed implantation.Material and methodsOne thousand, one hundred and eighty-seven patients with localized prostate cancer at low-, intermediate-, or high-risk of progression received LDR brachytherapy using iodine-125 seeds with curative intent, applied as monotherapy or in combination with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), and/or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). At 60 months after seed implantation, data of 1,064 patients (1,058 alive + 6 who died of prostate cancer) were analyzed for biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels using the Phoenix definition. Five-year bPFS probabilities were determined for various risk group classifications (d’Amico, Mt. Sinai, MSKCC/Seattle, NCCN). Outcomes were also compared to patient-individualized nomogram predictions of 5-year bPFS (Kattan 2002) and probability of organ-confined disease (Kattan 2002, Partin 2007).ResultsOverall, 93.3% (993/1,064) of the patients were free of biochemical progression within 5 years, while the average 5-year bPFS probability according to the Kattan nomogram was significantly lower (85%, p < 0.001). Outcomes were significantly better than Kattan nomogram predictions in the subgroup of patients with monotherapy as well as in patients additionally treated with EBRT. Comparison of the overall outcome with nomogram predictions for organ-confined disease (Kattan nomogram: 50%; Partin nomogram: 65%) revealed a significant probability of LDR brachytherapy to destroy periprostatic tumor spread (p < 0.001) in all risk group constellations, even in high-risk patients.ConclusionsThe results indicate high effectiveness of LDR brachytherapy in all risk groups, significantly better than predicted with the Kattan nomogram in most subgroups. The significant superiority of LDR brachytherapy compared to nomogram predictions of organ-confined disease suggests that LDR brachytherapy effectively controls both intra- and periprostatic disease.

Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life After Radical Prostatectomy Only Versus a Combination of Prostatectomy with Radiation and Hormonal Therapy

BackgroundWhile the optimal use and timing of secondary therapy after radical prostatectomy (RP) remain controversial, there are limited data on patient-reported outcomes following multimodal therapy. ObjectiveTo assess the impact of additional radiation therapy (RT) and/or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) on urinary continence, potency, and quality of life (QoL) after RP. Design, setting, and participantsAmong 13150 men who underwent RP from 1992 to 2013, 905 received RP + RT, 407 RP + ADT and 688 RP + RT + ADT. Outcome measurements and statistical analysesUrinary function, sexual function, and overall QoL were evaluated annually using self-administered validated questionnaires. Propensity score–matched and bootstrap analyses were performed, and the distributions for all functional outcomes were analyzed as a function of time after RP. Results and limitationsPatients who received RP + RT had a 4% higher overall incontinence rate 3 yr after surgery, and 1% higher rate for severe incontinence (>3 pads/24h) compared to matched RP-only patients. ADT further increased the overall and severe incontinence rates by 4% and 3%, respectively, compared to matched RP + RT patients. RP + RT was associated with an 18% lower rate of potency compared to RP alone, while RP + RT + ADT was associated with a further 17% reduction compared to RP + RT. Additional RT reduced QoL by 10% and additional ADT by a further 12% compared to RP only and RP + RT, respectively. The timing of RT after RP had no influence on continence, but adjuvant compared to salvage RT was associated with significantly lower potency (37% vs 45%), but higher QoL (60% vs 56%). Limitations of our study include the observational study design and potential for selection bias in the treatments received. ConclusionsSecondary RT and ADT after RP have an additive negative influence on urinary function, potency, and QoL. Patients with high-risk disease should be counseled before RP on the potential net impairment of functional outcomes due to multimodal treatment. Patient summaryMen with high-risk disease choosing surgery upfront should be counseled on the potential need for additional radiation and or androgen deprivation, and the potential net impairment of functional outcomes arising from multimodal treatment.

Long‐term potency preservation following brachytherapy for prostate cancer

Study Type - Therapy (case series). Level of Evidence 4. What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Previously, rates of potency preservation with or without external beam radiation and/ or hormone therapy have been published with smaller series and limited follow-up. The study provides greater numbers and longer follow-up giving patients and clinicians a better appreciation of the true potency preservation rates in this population and how various factors such as age, hormone use and external beam affect those rates. • To assess potency preservation in men following brachytherapy for prostate cancer with or without external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and/or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). • To evaluate the factors that significantly impact this rate. • In all, 1063 potent men with T1-T3 prostate cancer were treated from 1990 to 2007 with seed implantation alone ((103) Pd or (125) I) (69.6%) or combined modality treatment consisting of a partial dose (103) Pd implant followed 6-8 weeks later by EBRT (45 Gy, prostate/seminal vesicles only) (30.4%). ADT was used in 49.1% of cases (range 1-27 months). • Patients were required to have a minimum of 2 years follow-up and to be off ADT for a minimum of 1 year. • Erectile function was assessed prior to seed implantation and at each follow-up visit using the physician-assigned Mount Sinai Erectile Function Score (MSEFS): 0, unable to have erections; 1, erections insufficient for intercourse; 2, suboptimal erections but sufficient for intercourse; 3, normal erectile function. Potent was defined as a score of greater than or equal to 2 with or without use of a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor. • The potency rate was calculated using actuarial methods with comparisons tested by log-rank and Cox regression analysis. • The 5-year and 10-year actuarial rate of potency preservation was 68.0% and 57.9%, respectively, at last follow-up. • On multivariate analysis, 5- and 10-year potency was 87.6% (79.5%) for men younger than 60, 68.0% (57.5%) for age 60-70, and 42.2% (31.0%) for men older than 70 (P < 0.001). • Pretreatment MSEFS of 2 had a potency rate of 51.7% (37.2%) vs 74.2% (65.2%) for an MSEFS of 3 (P < 0.001). • There was a 75.8% (62.6%) potency rate without ADT vs 60.0% (53.0%) with ADT (P < 0.001). • Five-year potency was 76.4% for implant alone, 71.0% for implant with EBRT, 62.2% for implant with ADT, and 57.9% for implant with EBRT and ADT (P < 0.001). • Increasing initial age at implant, diminished pretreatment erectile function and the use of combination therapy with EBRT and/or ADT significantly increases erectile dysfunction following brachytherapy.

Long-term Potency Preservation following Brachytherapy for Prostate Cancer

To assess potency preservation in men following brachytherapy for prostate cancer with or without external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and/or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and to evaluate the factors that significantly impact this rate.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of bone metabolism in prostate adenocarcinoma.

e15149 Background: Osteoporosis could be associated with the hormone therapy for metastatic prostate carcinoma (PCa) and with PCa per se. The objective of the study is to clarify the relationship of prostate cancer and/or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with osteoporosis. Methods: The Medline, Embase, Cancerlit, and American Society of Clinical Oncology Abstract databases were searched for published studies on prostate cancer and bone metabolism. The outcomes assessed were: fracture, osteoporosis and osteopenia. Results: Thirty-one articles (78,753 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. PCa patients under ADT had a higher risk of osteoporosis (RR, 1.30; p < 0.00001) and a higher risk of fractures (RR, 1.10; p < 0.00001) as compared to patients not under ADT. The total bone mineral density was lower in patients under ADT when compared with patients not under ADT (p = 0.031) but it was similar to bone mineral density found in healthy controls (p = 0.895). The time of androgen deprivation therapy correlated negatively with lumbar spine and total hip bone mineral density (Spearman's rho = - 0.490 and - 0.773; p = 0.028 and 0.001, respectively) and with total hip t score (Spearman's rho = - 0.900; p = 0.037). Conclusions: We found consistent evidence that the use of androgen deprivation therapy in patients with PCa reduces bone mineral density, increasing the risk of fractures in these patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Influence of body mass index on biochemical outcome after permanent prostate brachytherapy

To evaluate the impact of body mass index (BMI) on the 8-year biochemical outcome after permanent prostate brachytherapy with or without the addition of supplemental external beam radiotherapy and/or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). From April 1995 through February 2001, 686 consecutive patients underwent brachytherapy using either palladium-103 or iodine-125 for clinical Stage T1b-T3aNxM0 (2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer) prostate cancer. No patient underwent seminal vesicle biopsy or pathologic lymph node staging. The median follow-up was 59.5 months. The evaluated BMI subgroups were less than 25, 25.0 to 29.9, 30.0 to 34.9, and 35 or more kg/m2. Biochemical progression-free survival was defined by a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 0.4 ng/mL or less after a nadir. The clinical, treatment, and dosimetric parameters evaluated for biochemical progression-free survival included BMI, patient age, clinical T stage, Gleason score, preimplant PSA level, risk group, percentage of positive biopsies, isotope, use of supplemental external beam radiotherapy, use of ADT, prostate volume, planning volume, percentage of target volume receiving 100%, 150%, and 200% of the prescribed dose, minimal percentage of dose covering 90% of the target volume, tobacco use, and the presence of hypertension and diabetes. For the entire group, the actuarial 8-year biochemical progression-free survival rate was 95.8%, 95.6%, 94.1%, and 100% for patients in BMI categories less than 25, 25.0 to 29.9, 30.0 to 34.9, and 35 or more kg/m2, respectively. In hormone-naive and hormone-manipulated patients free of biochemical progression, the median post-treatment PSA level was less than 0.1 ng/mL. When integrated across risk groups and ADT use, BMI had no statistically significant impact on biochemical progression-free survival. At last follow-up, 5 patients (0.7%) had died of metastatic prostate cancer. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, pretreatment PSA level, Gleason score, clinical stage, percentage of positive biopsies, ADT use, and tobacco status, but not BMI, were statistically significant predictors of 8-year biochemical progression-free survival. Prostate brachytherapy results in a high probability of 8-year biochemical progression-free survival for low, intermediate, and high-risk patients. When integrated across risk groups and hormonal status, BMI had no statistically significant influence on biochemical progression-free survival.

Impact of supplemental external beam radiotherapy and/or androgen deprivation therapy on biochemical outcome after permanent prostate brachytherapy

To evaluate the impact of supplemental external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and/or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) on 8-year biochemical outcome after permanent prostate brachytherapy. Between April 1995 and January 2001, 668 consecutive patients underwent brachytherapy using either (103)Pd or (125)I for clinical Stage T1b-T3aNxM0 (2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer) adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland. No patient underwent seminal vesicle biopsy or pathologic lymph node staging. The median follow-up was 58.6 months. Biochemical progression-free survival was defined by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition. The clinical, treatment, and dosimetric parameters evaluated for biochemical progression-free survival included supplemental EBRT, ADT, patient age, clinical stage, Gleason score, preimplant prostate specific antigen (PSA), risk group, percentage of positive biopsies, isotope used, prostate volume, planning volume, percentage of target volume receiving 100%, 150%, and 200% of prescribed dose, minimal percentage of dose covering 90% of target volume, tobacco status, hypertension, and diabetes. For the entire group, the actuarial 8-year biochemical progression-free survival rate was 98.2%, 98.4%, and 88.2% for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients, respectively, with a median PSA level of <0.1 ng/mL for all risk groups and ADT and EBRT subgroups. At last follow-up, only 5 patients (0.8%) had died of metastatic prostate cancer. In multivariate analysis, Gleason score, percentage of positive biopsies, and ADT predicted for biochemical outcome in high-risk patients. In low- and intermediate-risk patients, none of the evaluated variables predicted for biochemical outcome. For the entire population, pretreatment PSA level, Gleason score, ADT, and clinical stage predicted for 8-year biochemical progression-free survival, with the percentage of positive biopsies approaching statistical significance. Prostate brachytherapy results in a high probability of 8-year biochemical progression-free survival for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients. Although the role of supplemental EBRT could not be adequately evaluated in high-risk patients, it did not improve biochemical outcome in low- and intermediate-risk patients. However, ADT resulted in a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival for high-risk patients.