Anatomic Single-bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Research Articles

Comparison of the quadrant method measuring four points and bernard method in femoral tunnel position evaluation on 3-dimensional reconstructed computed tomography after anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PurposeThis prospective study aimed to compare the postoperative evaluation of the quadrant method measuring four points and Bernard method in femoral tunnel position evaluation on 3-Dimensional (3D) reconstructed computed tomography (CT) following the arthroscopic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.MethodsThirty-eight patients with ACL tears that were reconstructed using single-bundle ACL reconstruction between May 2021 and March 2023 were included in this study. Postoperative 3D CT images were obtained after the operation. The femoral tunnel position was measured by use of the quadrant method measuring four points and Bernard method.ResultsAverage mean position of the femoral tunnel insertion center on the 3D CT image was at 26.16 ± 6.27% in the x-coordinate and at 24.36 ± 5.52% in the y-coordinate according to the Bernard method. Meanwhile, the position of the femoral insertion of the ACL measured by the quadrant method measuring four points was 24.2% ± 6.86% in the x-coordinate and 21.16% ± 5.14% in the y-coordinate.ConclusionsBoth the quadrant method measuring four points and Bernard method were effective in femoral tunnel position evaluation on 3D reconstructed CT. Application of the quadrant method measuring four points on 3D CT showed the advantage that measurement can be taken regardless of the shape of the bone tunnel.

Remnant-Sparing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Results in Similar Clinical, Functional, and Quality-of-Life Outcomes to Anatomic Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

To compare a large cohort of patients who underwent remnant-sparing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (rACLR) with a matched group of patients who underwent anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with respect to clinical laxity, patient-reported outcomes, and functional testing. Patients who underwent rACLR between January 2010 and December 2015 were matched according to age, sex, body mass index, and graft type to patients who underwent ACLR. The primary outcome measure was the ACL Quality of Life (ACL-QOL) score at final follow-up of 24 months. Secondary outcomes included functional tests and clinical laxity measurements at 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Concurrent intra-articular pathology at the time of surgery and postoperative complications were also recorded. Statistical analyses included the dependent t test and the Wilcoxon signed rank test. A total of 210 rACLR patients were successfully matched to a corresponding cohort of 210 ACLR patients. There were no statistically significant differences in ACL Quality of Life (ACL-QOL) or functional testing results between the groups; however, scores in both groups showed a steady and statistically significant improvement over time. A statistically significant difference was noted with respect to the Lachman test findings, favoring the rACLR cohort (Z= -2.79, P= .005); no between-group difference was seen for the pivot-shift test (Z= -0.36, P= .72). The rACLR group had a significantly lower rate of concurrent meniscal and chondral injury. There was no difference in complications between the groups (Z= -0.49, P= .63). There was no difference in patient-reported or functional testing outcomes in patients undergoing remnant-sparing compared with anatomic single-bundle ACLR. There was, however, a significantly lower rate of positive Lachman test findings after rACLR. Furthermore, the rate of concurrent meniscal and chondral pathology was lower in the rACLR group. Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Small Intercondylar Notch Size Is Not Associated with Poor Surgical Outcomes of Anatomical Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions.

Although many studies have been conducted on the association between the intercondylar notch size and the risk of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, few studies have examined its relationship with the condition after surgical treatment. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the surgical outcomes of anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction according to intercondylar notch volumes. Medical records of patients who underwent anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction using a tibialis anterior allograft between 2015 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. For each sex, eligible patients were classified into two groups based on their percentile of intercondylar notch volumes, which were measured using postoperative three-dimensional computed tomography images (group S, ≤ 50th percentile of included patients; group L, > 50th percentile of included patients). Additional grouping was performed based on the group's percentiles of normalized values of intercondylar notch volumes to body heights. Between-group comparative analyses were performed on the perioperative data and surgical outcomes in both objective and subjective aspects. One hundred patients were included in the study. For male patients, there were no differences in the overall surgical outcomes between groups, whereas group L showed a significantly greater knee anteroposterior (AP) laxity than group S at the final follow-up (p = 0.042 for the side-to-side differences [SSD] at the maximum manual force). Similarly, there were no differences in the female patients in the overall surgical results between the groups, whereas group L showed a significantly greater knee AP laxity at the final follow-up (p = 0.020 for the SSD at 134 N; p = 0.011 for the SSD at the maximum manual force). Additional analyses based on the normalized values of the intercondylar notch volume showed consistent results for male patients, and additional grouping for female patients was identical to the existing grouping. The surgical outcomes of anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction in patients with relatively small intercondylar notch volumes were comparable to those with large notch volumes, but rather showed favorable outcomes in postoperative knee AP laxity.

Race and Gender Differences in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Femoral Footprint Location and Orientation: A 3D-MRI Study.

The femoral tunnel position is crucial to anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, but the ideal femoral footprint position are mostly based on small-sized cadaveric studies and elderly patients with a single ethnic background. This study aimed to identify potential race- or gender-specific differences in the ACL femoral footprint location and ACL orientation, determine the correlation between the ACL orientation and the femoral footprint location. Magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of 90 Caucasian participants and 90 matched Chinese subjects were used for reconstruction of three-dimensional (3D) femur and tibial models. ACL footprints were sketched by several experienced orthopedic surgeons on the MRI photographs. The anatomical coordinate system was applied to reflect the ACL footprint location and orientation of scanned samples. The femoral ACL footprint locations were represented by their distance from the origin in the anteroposterior (A/P) and distal-proximal (D/P) directions. The orientation of the ACL was described with the sagittal, coronal and transverse deviation angles. The ACL orientation and femoral footprint position were compared by the two-sided t-test. Multiple regression analysis was used to study the correlation between the orientation and femoral footprint position. The average femur footprint A/P position was -6.6 ± 1.6 mm in the Chinese group and -5.1 ± 2.3 mm in the Caucasian group, (p < 0.001). The average femur footprint D/P position was -2.8 ± 2.4 mm in Chinese and - 3.9 ± 2.0 mm in Caucasians, (p = 0.001). The Chinese group had a mean difference of a 1.5 mm (6.1%) more posterior and 1.1 mm (5.3%) more proximal in the position from the flexion-extension axis (FEA). And the males have a sagittal plane elevation about 4-5° higher than females in both racial groups. Furthermore, for every 1% (0.40 mm) increase in A/P and D/P values, the sagittal angle decreased by about 0.12° and 0.24°, respectively; the coronal angle decreased by about 0.10° and 0.30°, respectively. For every 1% (0.40 mm) increase in D/P value, the transverse angle increased by about 0.14°. The significant race- and gender-specific differences in the femoral footprint and orientation of the ACL should be taken in consideration during anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction. Furthermore, the quantitative relationship between the ACL orientation and the footprint location might provide some reference for surgeons to develop a surgical strategy in ACL single-bundle reconstruction and revision.

The effects of remnant-preserving anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on proprioception: A prospective comparative study.

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction performed by preserving remnant tissue on proprioception and to assess the effects it has on isokinetic quadriceps and hamstring muscle strength, as well as on range of motion and functional scores. A prospective study was conducted with 44 patients who underwent either anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with remnant preservation (study group, n=22) or with remnant excision (control group, n=22) with the use of a 4-strand hamstring allograft. The mean follow-up time was 20.2 ± 1.4 months after surgery. Using an isokinetic dynamometer, proprioception was evaluated with passive joint position perception at 150, 450, and 600, and quadriceps femoris, and hamstring muscle strength were evaluated at speeds of 900, 1800, and 2400 per second. Range of motion was measured using a goniometer. Functional outcomes were assessed using International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee evaluation score and Lysholm knee scoring questionnaires. It was only at 15° of knee flexion that there was a statistically significant difference in proprioception; the median of the difference in the amount of deviation from the target angle between the healthy knee and the operated side was 1.7 (range, 0.7-20.7) in those with remnant preserved, and 2.7 (range, 1-26) in those with remnant excised (P=.016). At 2400/s speed, the mean quadriceps femoris strength was 77.2 ± 24.3 Nm in those with remnant preserved and 67.6 ± 24.2 Nm in those with remnant excised. (P=.048) There was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of range of motion, International Knee Documentation Committee, and Lysholm knee scoring. (P > .05) Conclusion: The present study has demonstrated that better proprioception and higher quadriceps femoris muscle strength can be obtained by remnant-preserving anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a hamstring autograft. Level II, Therapeutic study.

Anatomical Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using a Calcium Phosphate-Hybridized Tendon Graft with More than an Average of 5 Years of Follow-Up: A Follow-Up Study of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Calcium phosphate (CaP)-hybridized tendon grafting using an alternate soaking process improves tendon-to-bone healing in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions. This study aimed to compare bone tunnel enlargement, knee osteoarthritis, and clinical results between CaP-hybridized tendon grafting and conventional grafting in anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction. This study was a follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Between July 2011 and December 2015, 90 patients underwent unilateral anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstructions and were randomly assigned to the CaP-hybridized tendon grafting (CaP group, n = 45; age, 27.1 [14-54] years; sex, 21 males and 24 females) or conventional grafting (control group, n = 45; age, 22.9 [13-58] years; sex, 26 males and 19 females). The randomization was performed according to the days of the week when the patients first visited the outpatient. The CaP-hybridized tendon grafting was created intraoperatively. The tendon grafts were soaked in a calcium solution for 30 s. After that, the tendon grafts were soaked in a NaHPO4 solution for 30 s. This soaking cycle between the calcium solution and the NaHPO4 solution was repeated 10 times. The bone tunnel enlargement, osteoarthritis grade, clinical score, and sports level were evaluated in patients who could be followed up for >3 years (CaP group, n = 20, average follow-up period 6.0 [5.1-6.9] years; control group, n = 15, average follow-up period 5.6 [4.3-6.9] years). Clinical scores, sports levels, and osteoarthritis grades were analyzed using a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) based on repeated measurement data from preoperative and final observations, with time, group, sex, age, and BMI as fixed effects and the effect of individual differences as variable effects. In addition, bone-tunnel enlargements were analyzed using generalized linear models (GLM) with group, sex, age, and BMI as the main effects. Compared with the control group, the CaP group exhibited significantly reduced bone-tunnel enlargement on the femoral side (anteroposterior diameter; CaP group, 7.9% [-1.1-16.8] vs. control group, 29.2% [17.9-40.5], p = 0.004, MCID 16.05, proximal-distal diameter; CaP group, 7.9% [-1.9-17.8] vs. control group, 22.8% [10.9-34.7], p = 0.062, MCID 15.00). The osteoarthritis grades progressed in both groups (p < 0.001). The clinical scores and sports levels were not significantly different between the groups. This study suggests that the calcium phosphate-hybridized tendon graft reduces femoral bone-tunnel enlargement after anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in an average >5-year follow-up period. A longer follow-up period is necessary to reveal the clinical effects of the calcium phosphate-hybridized tendon grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Similar postoperative outcomes and landing test results after single-bundle anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with or without remnant preservation

article: Similar postoperative outcomes and landing test results after single-bundle anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with or without remnant preservation - Medicina dello Sport 2022 December;75(4):591-606 - Minerva Medica - Journals

Increased ACL direct insertion coverage provided more positive biomechanical effects on graft and bone tunnel during knee flexion: a simulation study

PurposeFlattened femoral tunnels were recently applied in anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Little is known about the biomechanical effect of such changes during knee flexion. The aim of the present simulation study was to assess the effect of altered ACL direct insertion coverage on the biomechanics of the graft and bone tunnel.MethodsFive finite element (FE) models, including a round femoral tunnel and four progressively flattened rounded rectangular femoral tunnels, were established to represent the ACL reconstructions. In vivo knee kinematics data obtained from the validated dual fluoroscopic imaging techniques controlled the FE models to simulate lunge motions. The maximal principal stress of the graft and the volume of equivalent strain within 1000–3000 microstrain (V1000-3000) of the cancellous bone were subsequently calculated at 0°, 30°, 60° and 90° of knee flexion.ResultsA lower stress state on the graft and a more beneficial strain state on the cancellous bone were observed when the femoral tunnel better covered the ACL direct insertion. The average maximal principal stress of each model were 3.93 ± 0.60 MPa, 3.82 ± 0.54 MPa, 3.43 ± 0.44 MPa, 3.45 ± 0.44 MPa and 3.05 ± 0.43 MPa, respectively. The average V1000-3000 of the cancellous bone of each model were 179.06 ± 89.62 mm3, 221.40 ± 129.83 mm3, 247.57 ± 157.78 mm3, 282.74 ± 178.51 mm3 and 295.71 ± 162.59 mm3, respectively. Both the stress and strain values exhibited two peaks during the flexion simulation. The highest value occurred at 30° of flexion, and the second highest value occurred at 90° of flexion.ConclusionsIncreased ACL direct insertion coverage provided more positive biomechanical effects after anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction during knee flexion.

Multi-planar instability, laxity and reduced knee flexion during the support phase of walking are determinants of return to sports.

Background: After anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, some patients are not recommended to return to high-level physical activity because they fail to pass return-to-sports tests. The kinematic difference between these patients and those who pass the return-to-sports tests is unclear. Methods: Eighty-two patients who received anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction for unilateral ACL injury underwent return-to-sport tests during a hospital visit at a minimum of 9months (9-11 months) of follow-up. Fifteen patients who passed the return-to-sports tests (RTS group) and fifteen patients who did not (NRTS group) were randomly selected to perform a treadmill walk under dual-fluoroscopic imaging system surveillance for a 6 degrees of freedom kinematic evaluation. Results: Of the 82 patients, 53 passed the return-to-sports tests 9 months after surgery, with a return-to-sports rate of 64.6%. In the stance phase, the NRTS group had a larger anterior tibial translation (1.00 ± 0.03mm vs. 0.76 ± 0.03mm, p = 0.001), a larger lateral tibial movement (1.61 ± 0.05mm vs. 0.77 ± 0.05mm, p < 0.001), a larger distal tibial displacement (-3.09 ± 0.05mm vs. -2.69 ± 0.05mm, p < 0.001), a smaller knee flexion angle (6.72 ± 0.07° vs. 8.34 ± 0.07°, p < 0.001), a larger varus angle (-0.40 ± 0.03°VS. -0.01 ± 0.03°, p < 0.001) and a larger external rotation angle (1.80 ± 0.05° vs. 1.77 ± 0.05°, p < 0.001) than the RTS group. The maximum anterior tibial translation of the NRTS group is also larger than that of the RTS group (3.64 ± 0.42mm vs. 3.03 ± 0.59mm, p = 0.003). Conclusion: Compared with patients passing RTS tests, those who fail to pass show significant anterior, lateral, and rotational instability; knee laxity; and reduced flexion angle of the knee in the support phase during walking, which may be the possible factors hindering a return to sports.

Intra-Articular Biomechanical Changes of the Meniscus and Ligaments During Stance Phase of Gait Circle after Different Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgical Procedures: A Finite Element Analysis.

The debate on the superiority of single- or double-bundle for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction has not ceased. The comparative studies on intra-articular biomechanics after different surgical reconstructions are rare. This study is to evaluate the biomechanical stress distribution intra-knee after single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by three-dimensional finite element analysis, and to observe the change of stress concentration under the condition of vertical gradient loads. In this study, magnetic resonance imaging data were extracted from patients and healthy controls for biomechanical analysis. Patients included in the three models were matched in age and sex. The strength and distribution of induced stresses were analyzed in two frequently used procedures, anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, using femoral-graft-tibial system under different loads, to mimic a post-operation mechanical motion. The three-dimensional finite-element models for normal ligament and two surgical methods were applied. A vertical force simulating daily walking was performed on the models to assess the interfacial stresses and displacements of intra-articular tissues and ligaments. The evaluation results mainly included the stress of each part of ligament and meniscus. The stress values of different parts of three models were extracted and compared. The stress of ligament/graft at femoral side of three finite-element models was significantly higher than at tibial side, while the highest level was observed in single-bundle reconstruction finite-element model. With the increase of force, the maximum stress in the medial (7.1-7.1 MPa) and lateral (4.9-7.4 MPa) meniscus of single-bundle reconstruction finite-element model shifted from the anterior horn to the central area (p=0.0161, 0.0479, respectively). The stress was shown to be at a lower level at femoral side and posterior cruciate ligament of intra-knee in two reconstruction finite-element models than that in normal finite-element models, while presented higher level at the tibial side than normal knee (p=0.3528). The displacement of the femoral side and intra-knee areas in reconstruction finite-element models was greater than that in normal finite-element model (p=0.0855). Compared with the single-bundle technique, the graft of double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction has better stress dissipation effect and can prevent postoperative meniscus tear more effectively.

Trends in Primary Anatomical Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Practice in Adult Patients Prevalent Among Arthroscopy Surgeons of Six Southern States of India

BackgroundAlthough guidelines from multiple scientific studies decide the general trend in ACLR practice, there is often a variation between scientific guidelines and actual practice.MethodsA 17-member committee comprised of sports surgeons with experience of a minimum of 10 years of arthroscopy surgery finalized a survey questionnaire consisting of concepts in ACL tear management and perioperative trends, intraoperative and post-operative practices regarding single-bundle anatomic ACLR. The survey questionnaire was mailed to 584 registered sports surgeons in six states of south India. A single, non-modifiable response was collected from each member and analyzed.Results324 responses were received out of 584 members. A strong consensus was present regarding Hamstring tendons preference for ACLR, graft diameter ≥ 7.5 mm, viewing femoral footprint through the anterolateral portal, drilling femoral tunnel from anteromedial portal guided by ridges and remnants of femoral footprint using a freehand technique, suspensory devices to fix the graft in femur and interference screw in the tibia and post-operative bracing. A broad consensus was achieved in using a brace to minimize symptoms of instability of an ACL tear and antibiotic soaking of graft. There was no consensus regarding the timing of ACLR, preferred graft in athletes, pre-tensioning, extra-articular procedure, and return to sports. There was disagreement over hybrid tibial fixation and suture tapes to augment graft.ConclusionDiverse practices continue to prevail in the management of ACL injuries. However, some of the consensuses reached in this survey match global practices. Contrasting or inconclusive practices should be explored for potential future research.

ACL stump and ACL femoral landmarks are equally reliable in ACL reconstruction for assisting ACL femoral tunnel positioning.

This study aimed to comparatively evaluate the accuracy of femoral tunnel positioning after anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction performed with the remnant preservation (RP) technique versus the non-remnant preservation (NRP) technique. A retrospective review of 145 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction from May 2020 to May 2022 were performed in this single-surgeon study. A total of 120 patients met the inclusion criteria and were allocated into two groups according to the surgical technique (i.e. RP group and NRP group). The relative location of the femoral tunnel in the lateral condyle was evaluated as a percentage using a standardized grid system on the three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) image. The accuracy and precision of the RP group were assessed based on published anatomical data in direct comparison with the NRP group. According to the surgical procedure, 57 of the 120 patients included were allocated into the RP group, and 63 into the NRP group. Significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of tunnel position (posterior-to-distal (PD): 28.4 ± 5.4% (RP) vs. 31.8 ± 5.3% (NRP); P = 0.01), (anterior-to-posterior (AP): 32.6 ± 7.7% (RP) vs. 38.8 ± 7.7% (NRP); P = 0.00), while no significant differences were found in terms of the accuracy (8.6% (RP) vs. 8.9% (NRP); n.s) and precision (4.4% (RP) vs. 5.6% (NRP); n.s) of femoral tunnel positioning between the two groups. From this single-surgeon study, it was concluded that there were no differences in the creation of ACL femoral tunnel between the RP technique and the non-remnant preserving technique. Meanwhile, the RP technique would not sacrifice the ideal position of the femoral tunnel and is able to retain the possible benefits of the ACL stump. Level III.

MRI and functional assessment of triportal technique in arthroscopic anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery is routinely performed using two standard portals; however imprecise portal placement leads to the most common surgical error that is associated with the imprecise placement, which is the non anatomical positioning anatomical positioning of the femoral tunnel because of improper visualization of the posterior aspect of the medial surface of lateral femoral condyle, due to inadequate visualization of the attachment area over the femur using the standard two portals. To decrease the incidence of this error, various other portals have been descried to improve the visualization. We propose the routine use of an accessory medial portal, in addition to the standard anterolateral and anteromedial portals, to enhance the visualization of the lateral wall and to improve the anatomic accuracy. The arthroscope can also be moved interchangeably throughout the portals during the procedure for improved viewing during specific steps. The routine use of this portal was assessed both clinically and radiologically in our study at the end of 1 year by functional scoring and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan, wherein the accuracy of the femoral attachment and healing of the graft were checked. OBJECTIVES: To assess the functional and radiological results of the routine use of triportal technique in anatomical ACL reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective study on 20 patients who were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at the end of 12 months using the International Knee Documentation Committee and Lysholm score, and the stability was checked with Lachman and pivot shift test. An MRI of the postoperative knee was performed after 12 months to assess the position of the graft, graft integrity, and healing. RESULTS: All the patients at the end of the study had an exceptional functional and clinical outcome,which was correlated on MRI showing a near-accurate placement of the femoral tunnel with acceptable inclination. All our patients showed excellent anteroposterior and rotational stability when assessed by IKDC and Lysholm score at the end of 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the routine use of the accessory anteromedial portal gives a good functional outcome with the near-accurate placement of femoral tunnel, which corresponds to the MRI findings obtained in our study.

Effects of flexible reamer on the femoral tunnel characteristics in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

To compare the femoral tunnel characteristics using a rigid versus flexible reamer during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. It was hypothesized that the employment of a flexible reamer along with femoral tunnel would exhibit longer tunnel length and more acute femoral graft tunnel angle compared to the case of a rigid reamer.The study population included 28 patients who underwent anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using transportal technique and were able to take postoperative computed tomography (CT) evaluation. Of these, the femoral tunnel of 14 cases was drilled with a flexible reamer (group I) and in another 14 cases drill was performed with a conventional rigid reamer (group II). The femoral tunnel in group I was made at 90° of knee flexion. In group II, the femoral tunnel was created at 120° of knee flexion. The parameters of the femoral tunnels were compared in terms of the femoral tunnel length and femoral graft tunnel angle. Special software was used to create and manipulate (3-D) 3-dimensional knee models.The difference in the mean femoral tunnel locations expressed in percentage distance between the 2 groups was not significantly different. The mean femoral tunnel length of group I was significantly longer than that of group II, (P = .03, 36.7 ± 2.9 vs 32.9 ± 9.0 mm). The angle formed by the femoral tunnel and the graft in group I was significantly smaller than in group II (P = .01, 109.8° ± 9.4° vs 118.1° ± 7.2°).Our data suggest that the flexible reamer can provide sufficient tunnel length for the suspensory fixation with a fixed loop. Whereas, the femoral graft-tunnel angle through flexible reaming at 90° of knee flexion was more acute compared to rigid reaming at 120° of knee flexion.Study Design: level of evidence III

Clinical Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Versus Hamstring Tendons Autograft: A Retrospective Analysis.

Aim: The purpose of this retrospective study was to examine the clinical outcomes of anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using a free quadriceps (QUADRI) tendon or a quadrupled hamstring (HAM) autograft.Material and method: The retrospective analysis (Level III, Therapeutic Study) included consecutive patients who underwent ACL reconstruction between April 2017 and April 2020 using either a free quadriceps tendon autograft or a hamstring tendon autograft. All patients underwent ACL reconstruction to treat isolated ACL injuries. The Tegner-Lysholm knee scoring system and the modified Cincinnati knee score were used for evaluation before surgery, and at six weeks, six months, and one-year follow-up time.Results: In the present study, 35 people underwent quadriceps (QUADRI) grafts and 35 underwent hamstring (HAM) grafts. The demographic data for the groups were extremely comparable. The mean follow-up length for the HAM group was 11.96±0.28 months, while the QUADRI group had a mean follow-up period of 11.25±0.43 months. No significant variations in the Cincinnati score were observed between the two groups during any of the treatment's follow-up periods. Similarly, the Tegner Lysholm Score revealed no statistically significant differences between clinical outcomes in the HAM and QUADRI groups at all follow-up visits, except for the sixth week.Conclusion: Clinical outcomes are comparable in terms of stability and subjective assessments following ACL reconstruction using a free quadriceps or hamstring tendon autograft.

In vivo knee rotational stability 2years after the ACL reconstruction using a quadriceps tendon graft with bone block and bone-patellar tendon-bone graft.

The aim of this prospective randomised study was to evaluate clinical results and rotational stability at least 2years after single-bundle anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a quadriceps tendon graft with bone block (BT) and bone-patellar tendon-bone graft (BTB). In both groups (BT and BTB), 40 patients selected prospectively at random were evaluated. The mean follow-up after the surgery was 28months (range 24-33months). A navigation system was used to measure rotational stability of the knee joint. Cincinnati, Lysholm, and IKDC scores and visual analog score (VAS) were used to evaluate clinical results and the non-parametric Wilcoxon test was used for the statistical analysis. After the BT reconstruction, the mean internal rotation of the tibia (IR) was 9.5°. In the contralateral healthy knee joint, IR was 8.6° at average. After the BTB reconstruction, the mean IR was 9.9°. In the contralateral healthy knee joint, IR was 8.7° at average. We did not find any statistically significant difference in IR stability between BT and BTB reconstruction. In terms of clinical results, regarding the VAS, patients perceive significantly more pain after the BTB reconstruction (p < 0.05). Kneeling was reported more difficult and painful after BTB reconstruction. The BT reconstruction of the ACL provides similar clinical results, less pain, better flexion and the same rotational stability of the knee in comparison with the BTB reconstruction.

Does Bone Regrow After Notchplasty in ACL Reconstruction? A Prospective Computed Tomography Study With 2-Year Follow-up.

Background:During notchplasty in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, bone is excised from the lateral and roof area of the notch to widen the intercondylar space and avoid notch-graft impingement in extension. There are concerns that bone regrowth of the area will cause narrowing and increase the risk of complications.Purpose:To determine the possibility of late narrowing of the notch after notchplasty using computed tomography (CT) analysis.Study Design:Case series; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:Measurements were performed on CT scans (axial and sagittal planes with knee in extension) in patients who had undergone single-bundle anatomic ACL reconstruction using hamstring graft. Two axial image levels were used: at the anterior outlet and the anterior one-eighth level of the notch. The maximum notch height and width, the notch width at one-third and two-thirds of the preoperative notch midwidth height, the maximum condylar width, and the surface area of the lateral half of the notch were measured preoperatively and at 1 week and 2 years postoperatively.Results:Included were 20 consecutive patients (mean ± standard deviation age, 28 ± 7.3 years; follow-up, 24.2 ± 3.3 months). At the anterior notch outlet, the maximum notch width increased by 1.9 ± 1.7 mm at 1 week postoperatively and narrowed by 0.3 ± 1.1 mm at the final follow-up, while the maximum notch height increased by 1.7 ± 1.9 mm and narrowed by 0.8 ± 1.8 mm, respectively. At one-eighth of the roof length, the maximum notch width increased by 1.1 ± 1.7 mm at 1 week postoperatively and narrowed by 0.1 ± 1.1 mm at the final follow-up, and the maximum notch height increased by 1.2 ± 1.5 mm and narrowed by 0.5 ± 1.5 mm, respectively. All differences were statistically significant when comparing the pre- to the immediate postoperative measurements, and they were nonsignificant when comparing the immediate postoperative to the final follow-up measurements. The same applied for the ratio of maximum notch width to maximum condylar width, indicating no postoperative narrowing of the notch.Conclusion:Notch size-shape after a 2-mm notchplasty did not change significantly in stable knees during the first 2 years after anatomic ACL reconstruction. Surgeons should consider performing this adjuvant technique when there is notch-graft impingement during surgery.

Influence of lateral posterior tibial slope on tibial tunnel expansion after anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

To investigate the influence of lateral posterior tibial slope (LPTS) on tibial tunnel expansion after anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and the effect of tibial tunnel expansion on knee joint function. A clinical data of 52 patients with ACL rupture, who underwent arthroscopic anatomical single-bundle reconstruction between November 2018 and December 2019, was retrospectively analyzed. There were 32 males and 20 females with an average age of 34.3 years (range, 14-64 years). There were 22 cases of left knee and 30 cases of right knee. The time from injury to operation ranged from 7 to 30 days, with an average of 15.9 days. The knee function was evaluated by International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score and Lysholm score before operation and at 3 and 6 months after operation. At 3 and 6 months after operation, the LPTS and the width of exit, middle segment, entrance, and 2 cm from the exit of the articular surface of the tibial tunnel were measured based on MRI. The expansion of tibial tunnel was calculated and graded (degrees 0-3). According to LPTS, the patients were divided into group A (<6.0°), group B (6°-12°), and group C (>12°), and the difference in the expansion of tibial tunnel between groups was compared. All the 52 patients were followed up 6-12 months (mean, 7.1 months). The IKDC and Lysholm scores at 3 and 6 months after operation were significantly different from those before operation ( P<0.05); and the difference of knee scores between 3 and 6 months after operation was significant ( P<0.05). The tibial tunnel expanded after operation, and the relative expansion at the exit and the middle segment showed significant difference between 3 months and 6 months after operation ( P<0.05). The expansion degree of tibial tunnel was rated as degree 0 in 5 cases, degree 1 in 28 cases, degree 2 in 16 cases, and degree 3 in 3 cases at 3 months after operation, and degree 0 in 5 cases, degree 1 in 20 cases, degree 2 in 25 cases, and degree 3 in 2 cases at 6 months after operation. There was no significant difference in IKDC and Lysholm scores between patients with different expansion degrees of tibial tunnels ( P>0.05). The LPTS of 52 patients ranged from -0.8° to 18.7° (mean, 10.6°); there were 7 cases in group A, 24 cases in group B, and 21 cases in group C. There was no significant difference in age, gender, preoperative IKDC and Lysholm scores, and initial width of tibial tunnel between groups ( P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the relative expansion of tibial tunnel at exit and middle segment between groups at 3 months after operation ( P>0.05), and there was significant difference at 6 months after operation ( P<0.05). After anatomical single-bundle reconstruction of ACL, the tibial tunnel would expand to some extent in a short time. LPTS had a significant effect on tibial tunnel expansion, and the larger the angle was, the more obvious the expansion of the proximal tibial tunnel was. However, early knee function is not affected by tibial tunnel expansion.

Effect of Tibial Tunnel Placement Using the Lateral Meniscus as a Landmark on Clinical Outcomes of Anatomic Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background: It remains unclear if use of the lateral meniscus anterior horn (LMAH) as a landmark will produce consistent tunnel positions in the anteroposterior (AP) distance across the tibial plateau. Purpose: To evaluate the AP location of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction tibial tunnels utilizing the LMAH as an intra-articular landmark and to examine how tunnel placement affects knee stability and clinical outcomes. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of 98 patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction with quadrupled hamstring tendon autografts between March 2013 and June 2017. Patients with unilateral ACL injuries and a minimum follow-up of 2 years were included in the study. All guide pins for the tibial tunnel were placed using the posterior border of the LMAH as an intra-articular landmark. Guide pins were evaluated with the Bernard-Hertel grid in the femur and the Stäubli-Rauschning method in the tibia. Patients were divided by the radiographic location of the articular entry point of the guide pin with relation to the anterior 40% of the tibial plateau. Outcomes were evaluated by the Marx Activity Scale and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form. Anterior knee laxity was evaluated using a KT-1000 arthrometer and graded with the objective portion of the IKDC form. Rotational stability was evaluated using the pivot-shift test. Results: A total of 60 patients were available for follow-up at a mean 28.6 months. The overall percentage of AP placement of the tibial tunnel was 39.3% ± 3.8% (mean ± SD; range, 31%-47%). Side-to-side difference of anterior knee laxity was significantly lower in the anterior group than the posterior group (1.2 ± 1.1 mm vs 2.5 ± 1.3 mm; P < .001; r = 0.51). The percentage of AP placement of the tibial tunnel demonstrated a positive medium correlation with side-to-side difference of anterior knee laxity as measured by a KT-1000 arthrometer (r = 0.430; P < .001). The anterior group reported significantly better distribution of IKDC grading as compared with the posterior group (26 grade A and 6 grade B vs 15 grade A and 13 grade B; P = .043; V = 0.297). The pivot-shift test results and outcome scores showed no significant differences between the groups. Conclusion: Using the posterior border of the LMAH as an intraoperative landmark yields a wide range of tibial tunnel locations along the tibial plateau, with anterior placement of the tibial tunnel leading toward improved anterior knee stability.

Tibial Spine Location Influences Tibial Tunnel Placement in Anatomical Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of tibial spine location on tibial tunnel placement in anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT). A total of 39 patients undergoing anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction were included in this study (30 females and 9 males; average age: 29 ± 15.2 years). In anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction, the tibial and femoral tunnels were created close to the anteromedial bundle insertion site using a transportal technique. Using postoperative 3D-CT, accurate axial views of the tibia plateau were evaluated. By assuming the medial and anterior borders of the tibia plateau as 0% and the lateral and posterior borders as 100%, the location of the medial and lateral tibial spine, and the center of the tibial tunnel were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the correlation between tibial spine location and tibial tunnel placement. The medial tibial spine was located at 54.7 ± 4.5% from the anterior border and 41.3 ± 3% from the medial border. The lateral tibial spine was located at 58.7 ± 5.1% from the anterior border and 55.3 ± 2.8% from the medial border. The ACL tibial tunnel was located at 34.8 ± 7.7% from the anterior border and 48.2 ± 3.4% from the medial border. Mediolateral tunnel placement was significantly correlated with medial and lateral tibial spine location. However, for anteroposterior tunnel placement, no significant correlation was found. A significant correlation was observed between mediolateral ACL tibial tunnel placement and medial and lateral tibial spine location. For clinical relevance, tibial ACL tunnel placement might be unintentionally influenced by tibial spine location. Confirmation of the ACL footprint is required to create accurate anatomical tunnels during surgery. This is a Level III; case-control study.