Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard for measuring muscle size. However, postural conditions for thigh musculature have not been standardized across studies, with some employing supine or prone positions and the thigh either placed on the examination table or suspended to avoid contact. In either case, the thigh is compressed or sagged by gravity, potentially affecting muscle size. This study aimed to examine the effects of postural conditions on thigh muscle size. Twenty Olympic-style weightlifters and 20 untrained controls (10 men and 10 women in each group) underwent 3-Tesla MRI in the supine and prone positions, with the thigh in compressed and suspended conditions to determine the maximal anatomical cross-sectional area (ACSAmax) and muscle volume of 15 thigh muscle groups/individual muscles. Postural conditions changed the ACSAmax of the quadriceps (range of postural-related changes: 1.0%-7.9%), hamstrings (0.8%-19.1%), and adductors (2.4%-19.2%). Regardless of measurement position, the total volume of thigh muscles decreased under compressed conditions (0.6%-3.8%). Quadriceps and adductors decreased in muscle volume under compressed conditions (0.9%-4.0% and 0.8%-6.6%), while hamstrings increased (1.4%-9.3%). Male weightlifters, who possessed the largest thigh muscle volume, showed greater postural-related changes in the muscle volume of quadriceps, hamstrings, and adductors than the other subgroups. Therefore, postural conditions during MRI substantially change thigh muscle size, and the magnitude of the change depends on muscle size. Our results provide invivo evidence of the compressive behavior of thigh muscles and a new technical perspective for assessing thigh muscle size.
Read full abstract