Anatomical Axis Angle Research Articles

Variability of the femoral mechanical-anatomical axis angle and its implications in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty.

Distal femoral resection in conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA) utilizes an intramedullary guide to determine coronal alignment, commonly planned for 5° of valgus. However, a standard 5° resection angle may contribute to malalignment in patients with variability in the femoral anatomical and mechanical axis angle. The purpose of the study was to leverage deep learning (DL) to measure the femoral mechanical-anatomical axis angle (FMAA) in a heterogeneous cohort. Patients with full-limb radiographs from the Osteoarthritis Initiative were included. A DL workflow was created to measure the FMAA and validated against human measurements. To reflect potential intramedullary guide placement during manual TKA, two different FMAAs were calculated either using a line approximating the entire diaphyseal shaft, and a line connecting the apex of the femoral intercondylar sulcus to the centre of the diaphysis. The proportion of FMAAs outside a range of 5.0° (SD 2.0°) was calculated for both definitions, and FMAA was compared using univariate analyses across sex, BMI, knee alignment, and femur length. The algorithm measured 1,078 radiographs at a rate of 12.6 s/image (2,156 unique measurements in 3.8 hours). There was no significant difference or bias between reader and algorithm measurements for the FMAA (p = 0.130 to 0.563). The FMAA was 6.3° (SD 1.0°; 25% outside range of 5.0° (SD 2.0°)) using definition one and 4.6° (SD 1.3°; 13% outside range of 5.0° (SD 2.0°)) using definition two. Differences between males and females were observed using definition two (males more valgus; p < 0.001). We developed a rapid and accurate DL tool to quantify the FMAA. Considerable variation with different measurement approaches for the FMAA supports that patient-specific anatomy and surgeon-dependent technique must be accounted for when correcting for the FMAA using an intramedullary guide. The angle between the mechanical and anatomical axes of the femur fell outside the range of 5.0° (SD 2.0°) for nearly a quarter of patients.

Comparison of Robotic and Conventional Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes in Patients with Osteoarthritis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Robotic-arm-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (RUKA) was developed to increase the accuracy of bone alignment and implant positioning. This retrospective study explored whether RUKA has more favorable overall outcomes than conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (CUKA). A total of 158 patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis were recruited, of which 85 had undergone RUKA with the Mako system and 73 had undergone CUKA. The accuracy of component positioning and bone anatomical alignment was compared using preoperative and postoperative radiograph. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using questionnaires, which the patients completed preoperatively and then postoperatively at six months, one year, and two years. In total, 52 patients from the RUKA group and 61 from the CUKA group were eligible for analysis. The preoperative health scores and Kellgren–Lawrence scores were higher in the RUKA group. RUKA exhibited higher implant positioning accuracy, thus providing a superior femoral implant angle, properly aligned implant placement, and a low rate of overhang. RUKA also achieved higher accuracy in bone anatomical alignment (tibial axis angle and anatomical axis angle) than CUKA, but surgical time was longer, and blood loss was greater. No significant differences were observed in the clinical outcomes of the two procedures.

Alignment evaluation using different distal reference points after total knee arthroplasty

BackgroundTo assess alignment for total knee arthroplasty, the center of the ankle has been used as the main reference point for the distal tibia; however, the true load-bearing mechanical axis should be determined as a line from the center of the femoral head to the lowest point of calcaneus. Thus, the purpose of this study was to compare the differences in alignment. MethodsPatients with medial osteoarthritis who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty (Group A, center of ankle reference, or Group C, calcaneal contact reference) were recruited. We determined (1) the total number with calcaneal contact point lateral to the center of ankle and compared (2) percentage of displacement of the load-bearing axis at the level of the knee, (3) anatomical axis angle, (4) mechanical axis angle, and (5) tibial component angle. ResultsThe study included 94 patients (128 knees), with the calcaneal contact reference point located lateral relative to the center of the ankle in 88.3% (113/128 knees). Using calcaneal contact point references, displacement of the load-bearing axis at the knee was greater (p < 0.0001, 38.7% vs 34.0%), and angles demonstrated significantly valgus alignment (p < 0.0001, 5.6° vs. 4.8° for anatomical axis angle, −3.0° vs. −4.2° for mechanical axis angle, and 89.9° vs. 88.6°for tibial component angle). ConclusionsVarus alignment measured by the ankle reference method might correspond to the neutral alignment by the amount of valgus alignment indicated by the calcaneal reference. Surgeons should take this into account when preoperative planning, performing intraoperative procedures, and during postoperative evaluation.

New Single-stage Double Osteotomy for Late-presenting Infantile Tibia Vara: A Comprehensive Approach.

Successful surgical treatment of late-presenting infantile tibia vara (ITV) patient requires the correction of oblique deformities. The purpose of this study was to report on a new comprehensive approach to correct and prevent recurrence of these deformities with a single procedure. Medical records of 23 consecutive children (7 to 18 y) with advanced ITV (29 knees) were retrospectively reviewed after a mean of 7.3 years postoperatively (range, 2 to 22 y). Indications for the corrective surgery were any child 7 year or older with a varus mechanical axis angle ≥10 degrees or a varus anatomic axis angle ≥11 degrees and a medial tibial angle (MTA) slope <60 degrees. The deformities were corrected with a dome-shaped osteotomy proximal to the tibial tubercle with a midline vertical extension to the subchondral region of the joint and a lateral hemi-epiphysiodesis. At latest follow-up, means and medians of each tibial radiographic axis measurement improved significantly from preoperative values (P<0.001): mechanical axis angle from 23 degrees to 4 degrees varus, anatomic axis angle from 25 degrees varus to 1 degree valgus, MTA downward slope from 30 to 78 degrees, posterior MTA from 59 to 80 degrees. In total, 79% and 74% had good to excellent results based on radiographic criteria and clinical questionnaire for satisfaction, pain and function, respectively. Two abnormal medial tibial plateau types were described. This is the first study to use a single-stage double osteotomy performed proximal to the tibial tubercle for the late-presenting ITV for children 7 years of age or older. In addition to the effective correction of the 4 major tibial deformities, a lateral proximal tibial hemi-epiphysiodesis minimizes recurrence of tibia vara. A contralateral proximal tibial epiphysiodesis is recommended for treated skeletally immature patients with unilateral disease. Therapeutic level IV. See instructions for authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Posture of the foot: Don’t keep it out of sight, out of mind in knee osteoarthritis

BackgroundThere are many contributors of knee osteoarthritis including the postural abnormalities of the adjacent joints. The relationship between foot posture and the clinical-radiological parameters of knee osteoarthritis is poorly understood. Research questionIs foot posture related to the clinical and radiological parameters in patients with knee osteoarthritis? MethodsPatients diagnosed with primary clinical and radiographic medial tibiofemoral knee osteoarthritis were included in the study. Anteroposterior knee radiographs were staged by using the Kellgren-Lawrence grading system. Computer-based measurements of the medial joint space width (mJSW), condylar angle, anatomical axis angle, tibial plateau angle and condylar plateau angle were performed on digital anteroposterior knee radiographs. The Western Ontario and Mc Master University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire was used to assess pain and the functional status of the patients. Foot posture was assessed by the Foot Posture Index (FPI) system and feet were categorized into three (pronated, neutral and supinated). ResultsThe study included 150 patients (150 knees and feet at one side) with a mean age of 61.2 ± 10.1 years. In terms of foot posture groups; percentages for supination, neutral and pronation were 22.66%, 68.66% and 8.66%, respectively. In the group with supinated FPI; WOMAC total score, pain and function subscale scores were higher (p < 0.001), mJSW was narrowed (p = 0.038) and the condylar plateau angle was increased (p = 0.009). In the FPI pronation group; anatomic axis angle values were found to change in the varus direction (p = 0.012). SignificanceThe potential postural dysfunction of the foot should be taken into consideration during the assessment and/or management of a patient with knee osteoarthritis.

Different References for Valgus Cut Angle in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

The valgus cut angle (VCA) of the distal femur in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is measured preoperatively on three-joint alignment radiographs. The anatomical axis of the femur can be described as the anatomical axis of the full length of the femur or as the anatomical axis of the distal half of the femur, which may result in different angles in some cases. During TKA, the anatomical axis of the femur is determined by intramedullary femoral guides, which may follow the distal half or near full anatomical axis, based on the length of the femoral guide. The aim of this study was to compare using the anatomical axis of the full length of the femur versus the anatomical axis of the distal half of the femur for measuring VCA, in normal and varus aligned femurs. We hypothesized that the VCA would be different based upon these two definitions of the anatomical axis of the femur. Full-length weight bearing radiographs were used to determine three-joint alignment in normal aligned (Lateral Distal Femoral Angle; LDFA = 87º ± 2º) and varus aligned (LDFA >89º) femurs. Full-length anatomical axis-mechanical axis angle (angle 1) and distal half anatomical axis-mechanical axis angle (angle 2) were measured in all subjects by two independent orthopedic surgeons using a DICOM viewer software (PACS). Angles 1 and 2 were compared in normal and varus aligned subjects to determine whether there was a significant difference. Ninety-seven consecutive subjects with normally aligned femurs and 97 consecutive subjects with varus aligned femurs were included in this study. In normally aligned femurs, the mean value of angle 1 was 5.05° ± 0.76° and for angle 2 was 3.62° ± 1.19°, which were statistically different (P= 0.0001). In varus aligned femurs, the mean value of angle 1 was 5.42° ± 0.85° and for angle 2 was 4.23° ± 1.27°, which were also statistically different (P= 0.0047). The two different methods of outlining the anatomical axis of the femur lead to different results in both normal and varus-aligned femurs. This should be considered in determination of the valgus cut angle on pre-operative radiographs and be adjusted according to the length of the intramedullary guide.

Varus thrust visualized during gait was associated with inverted foot in patients with knee osteoarthritis: An exploratory study

The foot is speculated to play a role in knee joint kinematics. This exploratory cross-sectional study examined the association between static foot posture and the presence of varus thrust visualized during gait in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis (OA). Patients (n = 88 patients and 134 knees; age, 61–91 years; 68.2% female) with Kellgren/Lawrence (K/L) grade ≥1 in the medial compartment were included in this study and underwent gait observation for varus thrust. These patients’ three-dimensional static foot posture while standing was evaluated and their tibiofemoral joint K/L grades and anatomical axis angles were also assessed as covariates. Knees with varus thrust (22 knees, 16.4%) on average had a 4° more inverted calcaneus relative to the floor than those without varus thrust (P < 0.001). A logistic regression analysis showed that an increased calcaneus inversion angle was significantly associated with higher odds of the presence of varus thrust with adjustments for age, sex, body mass index, K/L grade, and anatomical axis angle. The other predictors, such as navicular height, navicular height/foot length, and rearfoot angle relative to the lower leg, were not significantly associated with varus thrust. These results suggest that patients with varus thrust had a different static rearfoot posture as compared with those without varus thrust, a finding that may indicate an important role of static rearfoot posture in the pathogenesis of varus thrust. Furthermore, investigating the potential influence of foot posture on the efficacy of biomechanical interventions, such as lateral wedge insole use, on varus thrust would be of particular interest in the further studies.

A prospective randomized controlled study of total knee arthroplasty via mini-subvastus and conventional approach

To compare the clinical and radiographic results between primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) via mini-subvastus or conventional approach through a prospective randomized controlled study. Ninety-four patients (104 knees) undergoing primary TKA between January 2011 and April 2012 were evaluated and randomly divided into 2 groups. Forty-six patients (52 knees) underwent TKA via conventional approach (conventional approach group), and 48 patients (52 knees) underwent TKA via mini-subvastus approach (mini-subvastus approach group). In these patients, 45 cases (51 knees) in conventional approach group and 45 cases (49 knees) in mini-subvastus approach group were followed up and recruited in the final analysis. There was no significant difference in age, gender, body mass index, sides, osteoarthritis grading, American Knee Society Score (KSS), Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, visual analogue scale (VAS), range of motion (ROM) of knee between 2 groups ( P>0.05). The clinical indexes were recorded and analyzed, including the operation time, length of incision, total blood loss, blood transfusion after operation, hospital stay time, the time of performing straight leg raise, incision condition, VAS score, ROM of knee, HSS score, and KSS score, hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), femoral anatomic axis and the femoral prosthesis joint angle (femoral angle), tibia anatomic axis and tibial prosthesis joint angle (tibial angle), femoral prosthesis flexion angle (FPFA), and posterior slope angle (PSA) of the tibial plateau. All patients were followed up. The average follow-up time was 66.4 months (range, 60.0-72.5 months) in conventional approach group and 65.6 months (range, 60.0-71.2 months) in mini-subvastus approach group. Compared with the conventional approach group, the incision of mini-subvastus approach group shortened, the operation time prolonged, and the time when patients started straight leg raise exercises was earlier; showing significant differences between 2 groups ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in hospital stay time, total blood loss, and numbers of blood transfusion between 2 groups ( P>0.05). The complication rate was 8.2% (4/49) in mini-subvastus approach group and 0 in conventional approach group, showing no significant difference between 2 groups ( P=0.054). At 1 and 3 days, the VAS and the ROM of knee in mini-subvastus approach group were significantly better than those in conventional approach group ( P<0.05); but there was no significant difference in above indexes between 2 groups at 14 day ( P>0.05). There was no significant difference in HSS and KSS scores between 2 groups at the 1, 3, 6, 12 months and 3, 5 years ( P>0.05). X-ray film showed no aseptic loosening in all cases. There was no significant difference in the measured values and incidence of abnormal patient of HKA, femoral angle, tibial angle, FPFA, and PSA at last follow-up between 2 groups ( P>0.05). TKA via mini-subvastus approach is helpful to the early function recovery of knee, but the long-term effectiveness is consistent with TKA via conventional approach. As the limited exposure, TKA via mini-subvastus spproach may has high risk of operative complications.

A patellar tendon length conservation method: Biplanar retrotubercle open-wedge proximal tibial osteotomy.

OBJECTIVE:The early-period results of our technique for performing a medial biplanar retrotubercle open-wedge proximal tibial osteotomy for the surgical treatment of varus gonarthrosis were evaluated and compared with those reported in the literature.METHODS:The clinical and radiological results of a medial biplanar retrotubercle open-wedge proximal tibial osteotomy performed on 23 knees in 22 patients with medial gonarthrosis with varus alignment were analyzed.RESULTS:Twenty patients were female and 2 were male. At the time of surgery, the mean age was 56.22 years (44–66 years), the mean body mass index was 31.95 kg/m2 (23.4–44.9 kg/m2), and the mean Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score was 68.7 (48–83). The mean preoperative femorotibial anatomical axis angle was 186.39° (173–194°), and the mean Insall-Salvati index value was 1.04 (0.94–1.171). The mean length of follow-up was 30.19 months (6–42 months). At the last follow-up examination, the mean HSS score was 86.48 (74–100), the mean femorotibial anatomical axis angle was 175° (168–171°), and the mean Insall-Salvati index value was 1.06 (0.857–1.32). Comparison of the final follow-up values with the preoperative values demonstrated significant improvement in the HSS score and femorotibial anatomical axis angle, but no significant difference in the Insall-Salvati index value.CONCLUSION:The results of this study indicated that frontal and sagittal plane deformities in patients with varus gonarthrosis can be treated with biplanar retrotubercle open-wedge proximal tibial osteotomy with good clinical results that achieve patellar tendon length stability and avoid patellofemoral problems.

Association of frontal plane knee alignment with foot posture in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis

BackgroundTo examine the association of radiographic frontal plane knee alignment with three-dimensional foot posture in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis (OA).MethodsParticipants in orthopedic clinics with Kellgren/Lawrence (K/L) grade ≥1 (88 patients and 88 knees; age, 61–91 years; 65.9% female) were enrolled. An anteroposterior radiographic view was used to assess the anatomical axis angle (AAA) after subtracting a sex-specific correction factor. The three-dimensional foot posture was also evaluated.ResultsMultiple regression analyses showed that increased corrected AAA (i.e., valgus direction) was independently associated with a decrease in the hallux valgus angle (regression coefficient: −0.40 per degree, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.72, −0.09; P = 0.013) and increase in the pronation angle of the calcaneus relative to floor (regression coefficient: 0.33 per degree, 95% CI: 0.10, 0.56; P = 0.005) adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index. The relationship between the corrected AAA and hallux valgus angle strengthened (regression coefficient: −0.60 per degree, 95% CI: −1.08, −0.13; P = 0.014) in varus-aligned knees examined separately (63 knees). The other foot postures (navicular height, navicular height/foot length, and rearfoot angle) were not significantly associated with corrected AAA.ConclusionsRadiographic frontal plane knee alignment was associated with hallux valgus angle and calcaneus angle relative to the floor in patients with medial knee OA, particularly in varus-aligned knees. These results indicate a connection between altered frontal knee alignment and foot posture, which may be helpful in understanding the pathogenesis of altered foot posture observed in patients with knee OA.

Clinical Impact of Coexisting Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis in Japanese Patients With Medial Knee Osteoarthritis.

To evaluate the clinical impact in knee osteoarthritis (OA) of coexisting patellofemoral (PF) joint OA (PFOA) in Japanese patients with medial tibiofemoral (TF) joint OA (TFOA). Patients with medial knee OA (n = 143) were enrolled. The radiographic severity of the TF and PF joints, anatomic axis angle of the TF joint, patellar alignment, trochlear morphology, patellar height, and passive range of motion (ROM) of the painful knee were evaluated. Additionally, the Japanese Knee Osteoarthritis Measure (JKOM) was used to investigate the association between the presence of PFOA and clinical symptoms. PFOA was present in 98 of 143 patients (68.5%) with medial knee OA. Quantile regression analysis revealed that coexisting PFOA was associated with the pain-related subcategory of the JKOM. Furthermore, multiple logistic regression analysis showed that coexisting PFOA was associated with higher odds of reporting knee pain on using stairs while ascending (odds ratio [OR] 4.81 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.73, 14.3]) and descending (OR 3.86 [95% CI 1.44, 10.8]). A more varus knee alignment and lower knee flexion ROM, which are features of patients with coexisting PFOA, were associated with knee pain while ascending/descending stairs. However, patellar alignment, trochlear morphology, and patellar height were not significantly associated with knee pain. PFOA coexisting with medial knee OA was associated with worse clinical symptoms, particularly while ascending/descending stairs, although patellar alignment did not contribute to reporting knee pain. Further studies that include evaluation of the PF joint are warranted to develop a basis for an optimal intervention based on compartmental involvement.

The Mechanical Axis of the First Ray: A Radiographic Assessment in Hallux Abducto Valgus Evaluation

The present report describes a new method of hallux abducto valgus deformity correction planning using the mechanical axis of the medial column (mechanical axis planning). This method of radiographic evaluation identifies an ideal position for the first metatarsal after correction and is useful regardless of the surgical procedure chosen. We retrospectively reviewed 200 radiographs to identify a “normal” value for the mechanical axis angle. We reviewed 100 radiographs of patients with hallux abducto valgus deformity (deformity group) and 100 radiographs of patients without hallux abducto valgus deformity (control group). The deformity group revealed an M1-M2 anatomic axis angle of 13.5⁰ ± 2.83⁰ and an M1-M2 mechanical axis angle of 11.58⁰ ± 1⁰. The control group revealed an M1-M2 anatomic axis angle of 7.5⁰ ± 1.76⁰ and an M1-M2 mechanical axis angle of 11.19⁰ ± 0.9⁰. The differences in the M1-M2 anatomic axis angle and M1-M2 mechanical axis angle were statistically significant between the control and deformity groups. We sought to provide a reliable method for planning hallux abducto valgus deformity correction by aligning the mechanical axis of the medial column and the mechanical axis of the first ray to the “normal” value of 11⁰ to reduce the deformity.

Does knee malalignment predict the efficacy of realignment therapy for patients with knee osteoarthritis?

Realignment therapies, including knee braces, foot orthoses and shoes are prescribed to patients with medial knee osteoarthritis (OA) with the goal of unloading the medial tibiofemoral (TF) compartment. It is uncertain whether realignment therapies have different effects in those with knee malalignment. We studied whether the efficacy of realignment therapy for pain and function in persons with medial TF OA is predicted by the severity of the baseline knee malalignment. The baseline characteristics of 48 participants with moderate to severe medial knee OA were collected. Participants' pain and function were measured using Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scale before and after 12weeks of realignment therapy using a valgus unloader knee brace plus bilateral neutral foot orthoses and motion control shoes. Anatomical axis (AA) was measured on weight-bearing knee radiographs by a blinded reader and knee malalignment was categorized as either varus malaligned (moderate or severe) or neutral according to the AA angle. We assessed for differences in response to treatment according to alignment category. General linear statistical models were generated to determine which of the measured alignment variables and covariates predicted change in the pain outcome. Anatomical axis knee alignment was not a significant predictor of pain or function change with active treatment. Baseline WOMAC scores were the best predictor of change in WOMAC (P<0.01 and P=0.06 for pain and function, respectively). Baseline knee alignment did not predict the efficacy of 12weeks realignment therapy in participants with medial tibiofemoral OA. [Correction added on 27 August 2015, after first online publication: 'did predict' has been corrected to 'did not predict' in the conclusions of the abstract section.].

Proximal Tibia Medial Biplanar Retrotubercle Open Wedge Osteotomy for Varus Knees with Medial Gonarthrosis

Objectives:The purpose of this study is to evaluate the early results of proximal tibia medial biplanar retrotubercle open wedge osteotomy for varus gonarthrosis and compare the results with the literatüre.Methods:The results of proximal tibia medial biplanar retrotubercle open wedge osteotomy for 23 knees of 22 patients with medial gonarthrosis were evaluated clinically and radiologically.Results:Twenty of the patients were female and two were male. Mean age of the patients was 56.24; mean boy mass index was 31.95 and preoperative HSS (Hospital for Special Surgery) score was 68.7. Mean tibiofemoral axis was 186.39° and mean Insall-Salvatti index value was 1.04 preoperatively. Mean follow up period was 30.19 months. Mean HSS score was 86.48, femorotibial anatomic axis angle was 175° and Insall-Salvati index value 1.06 during the last follow-up. The improvement of the HSS score and the femorotibial anatomic axis angle was statistically significant. However, the change in Insall Salvati index values was statistically insignificant. Nonfatal pulmonary embolus in 1 patient, and deep vein thrombosis that occured one year after the procedure in 1 patient, rhabdomyolysis in 1 patient and loss of correction (relapse) in 1 patient were encountered as complications.Conclusion:Our results show that proximal tibia medial biplanar retrotubercle open wedge osteotomy improves the frontal and sagittal plane deformities without changing the patellar tendon length. Hence, possible patellofemoral problems are prevented and the clinical results are improved.

Is a "sulcus cut" technique effective for determining the level of distal femoral resection in total knee arthroplasty?

Determining the level of distal femoral resection is crucial when performing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, variations in distal femoral resection are encountered unexpectedly. A "sulcus cut" technique is sometimes used to determine the level of distal femoral resection, but its effectiveness has not been evaluated. The aim of this study was to examine the reliability of the sulcus cut technique using computer simulation for preoperative planning. This study group comprised 40 knees in 34 patients (22 women, 12 men) scheduled for TKA. The preoperative planning software of a computed tomography (CT)-based navigation system was used. We determined the resected level of the femur so that the bone-implant interface of the femoral component was adjusted to the deepest subchondral bone of the trochlear groove in coronal CT images. We then measured each perpendicular distance from the resected surface of the proximal femur to the most distal point of the lateral and medial femoral condyles. The mean distances of the distal-lateral and distal-medial condylar resections from the femoral sulcus were 7mm (±1mm) and 8mm (±1mm), respectively. The resection level did not differ significantly between men and women or between different component sizes. There was a slightly positive correlation between the femoral mechanical and anatomical axis angle and the distance of the distal-lateral condylar resection from the femoral sulcus. The sulcus cut technique can be used to determine the desirable level of the distal femoral resection in TKA. Case series, Level IV.

How safe are orthoroentgenograms in determining the amount of correction for varus deformities?

In this study, we evaluated the effects of the distance of the legs from the midline on alignment and angles of the lower extremities in orthoroentgenograms. Between March 2012 and April 2013, 95 limbs of 56 patients with varus deformity who underwent orthoroentgenogram to identify the amount of joint laxity in two positions were included in this study. The initial X-ray was performed with the feet in contact, while the other was performed as the legs were abducted to be in line with the shoulders. For each orthoroentgenogram, the mean mechanical axis angle, anatomical axis, and joint line orientation angles were measured retrospectively. These measurements were repeated for 43 limbs with varus deformity >10°. In the orthoroentgenograms with the feet in contact, the mean mechanical axis angle was 9.58°±5.7°, (0.20°; 26.0°), the mean anatomical axis angle 3.65°±6.14°, (-9.0°; 21.0°), and the mean joint line orientation angle -3.41°±2.52°, (-12.0°; 1.60°). In the orthoroentgenograms with the legs abducted, the mean mechanical axis angle was 7.73°±5.58°, (-3.0°; 23.0°), the mean anatomical axis angle 2.62°±5.87°, (-11.0°; 18.30°), and mean joint line orientation angle was -2.44°±2.41°, (-13.0°; 3.0°). The differences in the angles between the two positions were statistically significant (p<0.005). Our study results showed that the mean values of mechanical axis angle, anatomical axis and the joint line orientation angle were higher in orthoroentgenograms with the feet in contact than the orthoroentgenograms with the legs abducted in patients with varus gonarthrosis. We suggest that this may lead to mistakes in the preoperative planning. Ideal positions should be standardized to minimize possible problems.

The factors associated with pain severity in patients with knee osteoarthritis vary according to the radiographic disease severity: a cross-sectional study

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) pain is suggested to be associated with inflammation and detrimental mechanical loading across the joint. In this cross-sectional study, we simultaneously examined the inflammation and alignment of the lower limb and examined how the pain components varied depending on the disease progression. One-hundred sixty female medial type of early- [n=74 in Kellgren-Lawrence (K/L) 2] to advanced-stage (n=96 in K/L >2) knee OA subjects (70.5 years on average) were enrolled. Knee pain was evaluated using a pain visual analog scale (VAS) and the pain-related subcategory of the Japanese Knee Osteoarthritis Measure (JKOM-pain). The serum interleukin (sIL)-6 level reflecting synovitis, and the high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) level were measured to evaluate the severity of inflammation. The anatomical axis angle (AAA) was measured as an alignment index. The β-coefficient was estimated after adjusting for age and the body mass index (BMI) using a multiple linear regression analysis. Multiple linear regression analyses showed that the sIL-6 levels, but not AAA, associated with the pain VAS [β=10.77 (95% confidence interval (CI): 4.14-17.40), P<0.01] and JKOM-pain scores [β=3.19 (95% CI: 1.93-4.44), P<0.001] in the early stage. Conversely, AAA, but not the sIL-6 levels, was found to be associated with the pain VAS [β=-1.29 (95% CI:-2.51 to-0.08), P<0.05] and JKOM-pain scores [β=-0.49 (95% CI:-0.82 to-0.16), P<0.01] in the advanced stage. The presence of a higher level of sIL-6 and the varus alignment of the joint is associated with pain in early- and advanced-stage knee OA patients, respectively.

SAT0331 Comparison of Anatomic Knee Alignment on Physical Examination and Radiographs

BackgroundSeverity of knee malalignment is a risk factor for osteoarthritis (OA) progression. Currently the hip-knee-angle, assessed on a full-limb radiograph, is the gold standard. Direct measurement of the anatomic axis...

Evaluation of Total Knee Arthroplasty Performed With and Without Computer Navigation: A Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty Study

Sequential bilateral total knee arthroplasty performed on 54 patients utilizing navigation (CAS-TKA) in one knee and traditional instrumentation (T-TKA) in the contralateral knee was reviewed at a mean follow-up duration of 2.5years. There were no differences with regard to KSS, ROM, postoperative anatomic alignment, mechanical axis, or tibial angle. There was a statistically significant decrease in outliers for the CAS-TKA group with respect to anatomic alignment (3.7% vs. 17.0%, P=0.024), mechanical axis (6.1 vs. 20.4%, P=0.037) and tibial component alignment (0% vs. 7.5%, P=0.042). There is no apparent benefit of CAS-TKA with regards to KSS, ROM, or alignment in the hands of fellowship-trained total joint specialists. The clinical relevance of reduced outliers in the CAS-TKA group is unknown with the current follow-up interval.

Malalignment and subchondral bone turnover in contralateral knees of overweight/obese women with unilateral osteoarthritis: Implications for bilateral disease

To explore whether the risk of incident tibiofemoral (TF) osteoarthritis (OA) in the radiographically normal contralateral knee of overweight/obese women with unilateral knee OA is mediated by malalignment and/or preceded by increased turnover of subchondral bone. We used data of post hoc analyses from a randomized controlled trial. Cross-sectional analyses evaluated the baseline association between frontal plane alignment and bone turnover in the medial TF compartment in 78 radiographically normal contralateral knees. Longitudinal analyses ascertained whether incident radiographic OA (TF osteophyte formation within 30 months) was associated with malalignment and/or increased bone turnover at baseline. Alignment subcategories (varus/neutral/valgus) were based on the anatomic axis angle. (99m)Tc-methylene diphosphonate uptake in a late-phase bone scan was quantified in regions of interest in the medial tibia (MT) and medial femur (MF) and adjusted for uptake in a reference segment of the ipsilateral tibial shaft (TS). MF and MT uptake in varus contralateral knees was 50-55% greater than in the TS. Adjusted MT uptake in varus contralateral knees was significantly greater than that in neutral and valgus contralateral knees (mean 1.55 versus 1.38 and 1.43, respectively; P < 0.05). Among 69 contralateral knees followed longitudinally, 22 (32%) developed TF OA. Varus angulation was associated with a marginally significant increase in the odds of incident OA (adjusted odds ratio 3.98, P = 0.067). While the small sample size limited our ability to detect statistically significant risk factors, these data suggest that the risk of developing bilateral TF OA in overweight/obese women may be mediated by varus malalignment.