Anatomical Subunit Research Articles

Nasal Tip Reshaping in Orthognathic Surgery: A Novel Intraoral Minimally Invasive Approach.

Current concepts in orthognathic surgery focus on not just rectifying dentoskeletal irregularities but also improving facial aesthetic and function. In this respect, nasal reshaping holds extraordinary significance in determining surgery effectiveness and patient satisfaction. Facial preoperative evaluations emphasize the paramount functional and aesthetic impacts of caudal septum in tip reshaping. Deviations in this anatomical subunit could lead to significant nasal obstructions and aesthetic changes as twisted nasal tip, affecting projection, rotation, and columellar-alar relationship. These considerations are essential in orthofacial surgery, as maxillary movements might exacerbate or worsen preexisting nasal tip deformity. In this paper, we aim to describe a novel and innovative minimally invasive approach presenting a detailed account of a rhinoseptoplasty in which the entire nasal tip reshaping procedure was performed intraorally during orthognathic surgery. The technique focused on achieving optimal nasal tip projection and rotation, centering, and stabilization through strategic maneuvers such as incremental dissection of maxillary spine chondroperiosteal junction, superoposterior strut preservation, vertical and caudal septum resection, and anterior nasal spine tip support. Techniques including subnasal drilling and septal stabilization suture are detailed. Specific attention is given to addressing deficiencies in posterior septal angle and labiocolumellar relationship. Postoperative care is described and subjective evaluations were performed to assess patient and surgeon satisfaction with facial symmetry and overall aesthetic improvements. In our experience, the described approach offers valuable surgical finesse to orthognathic surgery, effectively targeting caudal septum deviations and nasal tip droopy. Its unique perspective enhances both functional and aesthetic results, particularly in the context of profiloplasty. No external nasal incision was performed and the totality of nasal tip reshaping was scarless and performed through an intraoral approach. Surgical precision in execution of this novel and tailored surgical approach has been shown to have a profound impact for enhancing outcomes of orthofacial surgery procedure.

Anatomic Subunit Cleft Lip Repair: New Repair Concept Based on Nostril Sill and Philtrum-White Roll Junction.

A novel method for unilateral cleft lip repair based on lip anatomic subunits was presented in 2005 by David M. Fisher. It has about 25 landmarks with 2 arbitrary markings for the nostril. It is an important subunit when it comes to nose reconstruction. This article sheds light on the variance in nostril sill disposition among cleft lip patients. A novel marking technique based on differences in sills is presented. Furthermore, the unique anatomical structure of the philtrum-white roll junction is highlighted with a suggested modification to the subunit approximation leading to its reconstitution.

The Preservation Technique for Incomplete Unilateral Cleft Lip Reconstruction.

The incomplete unilateral cleft lip shares many of the same phenotypic characteristics as a complete unilateral cleft lip, but key differences include an intact nasal sill, a relative excess of skin in the lateral lip element, and favorable skeletal support. Surgical techniques for incomplete unilateral cleft lips should be tailored to the specific anatomical characteristics, be simple and reliable to perform, and minimize the risk of secondary deformity. Here we describe the "preservation technique" for incomplete unilateral cleft lip reconstruction. The modified design from the anatomical subunit approximation technique uses a nasal sill flap and obviates the need for nasal sill and lateral lip excision. Tissues of the lip are opened out and reorientated to maximize the anatomical advantage.

Outcomes of Fisher Technique for Unilateral Incomplete Cleft Lip Repair

Background:-
 Cleft lip repair is imperative for a child’s physical and mental well-being. Fisher’s innovative technique adds versatility to conventional methods with optimal aesthetic results. An inconspicuous scar along the anatomical subunits is a hallmark of this procedure. 
 Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of Fisher technique for unilateral incomplete cleft lip.
 Methods:-
 This Quasi experimental study was conducted at the Plastic Surgery Department, Mayo Hospital Lahore from 2017 to 2021. 50 consecutive patients with primary unilateral incomplete cleft lip were included in the study. Qualitative analysis was performed using Steffensen Grading Criteria 9. Improvement in pre-operative and post-operative anthropometric ratios was also analyzed. Symmetry of repaired cleft to normal cleft side was also assessed 9,12 .
 Results:-
 Mean age of patients was 4.14±0.72 months. Parent’s satisfaction score on the Likert scale was 4.84±0.37 (Mean ±SD). Significant improvement in anthropometric parameters (vertical lip height, vermilion height, nostril width and nostril height) except lip width was recorded. Significant symmetry was achieved for all parameters (p-value less than 0.05) except nasal height ratio (p- value=0.071). Good results were also achieved on all parameters according to Steffensen criteria.
 Conclusion:-
 Fisher anatomical subunit repair is a reliable option for unilateral incomplete cleft lip repair producing aesthetically pleasing results.

Aesthetic outcome comparison between Millard and Fisher technique for cleft lip surgery: a literature review

Background: Cleft lip is the most common congenital defect found in children, with a prevalence of 0.5 to 1.6 per 1000 live births. Besides causing functional problems, a cleft lip greatly affects the patient's aesthetic appearance. Therefore, several surgical techniques have been developed to produce a good clinical appearance to support the patient's social functioning. The Millard and Fisher technique is the most widely used cleft lip surgery (cheiloplasty) technique. This literature review aims to compare the aesthetic outcomes between the Millard and Fisher techniques in cleft lip surgery. Methods: This literature review was carried out by searching studies in online databases in the form of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar using the keywords "cleft lip surgery," "Millard," "Fisher," "aesthetic outcome," and "comparison." Appropriate studies were then carried out through a narrative synthesis analysis. Discussion: The Millard technique uses the principle of rotational and advancement flaps, performed by making incisions and flaps on two sides, namely a rotational flap on the medial lip and an advancement flap on the lateral lip. Meanwhile, the Fisher technique uses the principle of anatomical subunit approximation, in which the measurement of the boundaries and extent of the surgical procedure is very accurate, resulting in a more anatomical position of the scar tissue. Regarding surgical scars, nose symmetry, vermillion, Cupid's bow and nasal, and Steffensen grading, better aesthetic results were found in Fisher's technique compared to Millard's. Conclusion: Fisher's technique provides superior aesthetic results compared to Millard's technique in cleft lip surgery.

"Strategic Application of Anatomical Subunit Approximation Technique for Correction of Complete Unilateral Cleft lip".

To discuss advantages, disadvantages and strategical application of anatomical subunit approximation technique in complete unilateral cleft lip repair. Analysis of consecutive 28 cases. A single surgeon experience at a university hospital. Among 77 patients who underwent cleft lip repair between May 5, 2019 and June 30, 2021, 28 patients with complete unilateral cleft lip who received cheiloplasty by author's technique. Surgical outcomes were assessed by frontal view medical photographs obtained postoperatively at follow-up visits. The average length difference between cleft and noncleft sides was <10% for transverse lip length and philtral height. Nostril sill height demonstrated about twenty percent of difference with much variable results. Although the one sample t-test revealed that differences exist between the cleft and noncleft side, they were within an acceptable range. Understanding the strengths and limitations of anatomical subunit approximation technique enabled strategic application in complete unilateral cleft lip repair. Satisfactory outcomes were achieved not only regarding the scar placement but also regarding the symmetry of the lips and augmentation of nasal sill.

Anatomy of Neck Muscles, Spaces, and Lymph Nodes.

The following article details the muscular anatomy of the head and neck, including insertion, origin, action and innervation, organized by anatomic subunit and/or major action. This article also describes the spaces of the head and neck, including boundaties and contents. Finally, cervical lymph nodes are addressed according to anatomic location and lymphatic drainage.

The Anatomical Subunit Approach to Managing Tessier Numbers 3 and 4 Craniofacial Clefts.

Background:Patients with atypical facial clefts are rare, and there is a paucity of literature outlining the surgical approach to managing these patients. The anatomical subunit approach to the surgical correction of the cleft lip has revolutionized cleft care. Here, we outline our approach and operative technique to treating Tessier clefts 3 and 4 using a novel technique based on the anatomical subunit approach.Methods:All cases of Tessier facial clefts 3 and 4 between 2019 and 2021 from the senior author’s practice were reviewed retrospectively. Patient demographics, clinical presentation, procedure details, and complications are reported. The senior author’s technique is described in detail.Results:Five patients underwent treatment by the senior author during the study period. One patient had bilateral Tessier 4 clefts, one patient had bilateral Tessier 3 clefts, two patients had a unilateral Tessier 4 cleft, and one patient had a unilateral Tessier 3 cleft. Two of the patients had their clefts treated as secondary procedures. The surgical complication profile was a lost nasal stent in one patient. Treatment principles of the senior author’s technique are presented.Conclusions:The anatomical subunit approach to managing atypical facial clefts provides a structured approach to a complex problem for the cleft and craniofacial surgeon. The technique of repair presented here can assist surgeons attempting to treat patients with Tessier 3 and 4 clefts.

Experience of Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair using the Anatomical Subunit Technique in an Omani Population over a Five-Year Period.

ObjectivesThis study aimed to report the authors’ experience with the anatomical subunit technique for unilateral cleft lip repair, which has gained popularity worldwide.MethodsFrom July 2015 to April 2020, 114 consecutive cases of cleft lip underwent primary cleft lip repair with closed rhinoplasty by a single surgeon. The demographic data, severity and type of the cleft lip, surgical outcomes, including vermillion notching, were assessed by an independent senior surgeon. The rate of revision surgery was collected from the Al-Shifa® - 3Plus healthcare information system (Ministry of Health, Oman). Parents’ satisfaction regarding scar quality and lip and nose appearance was collected and all data were statistically analysed.ResultsA total of 82 cases satisfied the inclusion criteria. The mean age at surgery for cleft lip was 32 weeks. Among these, 35 cases (43%) were complete cleft lips and 47 cases (57%) were incomplete. Additionally, 43 children (52%) were born of consanguineous marriage. Six patients (7%) needed revision surgery. The digital survey was completed by 40 subjects (response rate: 48.8%) which showed 85% satisfaction rate with the postoperative scar and 77.5% satisfaction with the aesthetic appearance of the nose.ConclusionThe anatomical subunit technique resulted in a predictable outcome indicating a high rate of patient satisfaction with scar quality and nasal and lip symmetry in children with varying severity of cleft lip. The high percentage of consanguinity (52%) in this study highlights the need for more targeted national campaigns involving premarital counselling in the Omani population.

State of the art: The Unilateral Cleft lip and Nose Deformity and Anatomic Subunit Approximation.

The anatomic subunit approximation approach to unilateral cleft lip repair was developed over 20 years ago. While the underlying principles of the repair are unchanged, its description has been simplified, additional landmarks and creases have been added, and objective analysis of perioperative changes have provided better clarity regarding goals and desired alterations. We review recent insights regarding the deformity; describe the repair in a simplified manner; and link a stepwise approach to foundation-based primary rhinoplasty as a part of the avenue to creating nasolabial balance and harmony.

Current Surgical Practice for Children Born with a Cleft lip and/or Palate in the United Kingdom.

This study describes primary surgical reconstructions performed for children born with a cleft lip and/or palate (CL ± P) in the United Kingdom (UK). Data forms completed at the time of surgery included details on timing, technique, and adjuncts used during the operative period. Demographic data on participants were validated via parental questionnaires. Data were obtained from the Cleft Collective, a national longitudinal cohort study. Between 2015 and 2021, 1782 Cleft Collective surgical forms were included, relating to the primary reconstructions of 1514 individual children. The median age at primary cheiloplasty was 4.3 months. Unilateral cleft lips (UCL) were reconstructed with an anatomical subunit approximation technique in 53%, whereas bilateral cleft lips (BCL) were reconstructed with a broader range of eponymous techniques. Clefts of the soft palate were reconstructed at a median age of 10.3 months with an intravelar veloplasty in 94% cases. Clefts of the hard palate were reconstructed with a vomer flap in 84% cases in a bimodal age distribution, relating to reconstruction carried out simultaneously with either lip or soft palate reconstruction. Antibiotics were used in 96% of cases, with an at-induction-only regimen used more commonly for cheiloplasties (P < .001) and a 5 to 7-day postoperative regime used more commonly for soft palatoplasties (P < .001). Perioperative steroids were used more commonly in palatoplasties than cheiloplasties (P < .001) but tranexamic acid use was equivalent (P = .73). This study contributes to our understanding of current cleft surgical pathways in the UK and will provide a baseline for analysis of the effectiveness of utilized protocols.

Modification of Marking Procedure in Anatomical Subunit Approximation Technique in Treatment of Unilateral Cleft Lip

Modification of Marking Procedure in Anatomical Subunit Approximation Technique in Treatment of Unilateral Cleft Lip

Principalization of the Anatomical Subunit Approximation Technique of Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair

Background: The Anatomical Subunit Approximation cleft lip repair advantageously achieves a balanced lip contour with the line of repair placed along seams of aesthetic subunits. Since Fisher’s original description, it has been adopted widely and adapted, but some surgeons find the transition away from a cut-as-you-go approach challenging. Methods: We present an adapted Anatomic Subunit Approximation technique based on essential components of Fisher’s repair. The order of surgical execution is emphasized. Paradigm shifts are presented to help the surgeon used to more traditional rotation advancement techniques understand the Subunit philosophy. Minor adaptations such as surgically releasing lateral lip elements prior to marking are discussed. Results: A total of 53 eligible patients were treated with unilateral cleft lip repair by the senior author (D.C.) between February 2008 and April 2012 at Royal Children’s Hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Representative cases were chosen to demonstrate achievable results with the described technique. Conclusion: The proposed technique employs essential skin markings to achieve an anatomic subunit approximation lip repair, and appears to facilitate surgical outcomes with a high degree of symmetry. Core principles of repair include precise anatomical planning, tissue component separation, and muscle-driven advancement.

Anatomic Subunit Approach to Composite Reconstruction of Facial Gunshot Wounds.

With a rise in gun violence in the United States, surgeons are tasked with effectively managing penetrating facial trauma. The purpose of this study is to assess methods used for successful composite reconstruction of each anatomical facial subunit following penetrating trauma. A retrospective chart review was performed in subjects undergoing craniofacial reconstruction following penetrating trauma. Reconstructive methods were analyzed through operative reports. Subjects were categorized by anatomical subunit reconstructed (mandible, maxilla (malar complex and roof/palate), orbit, and cranium) and method of reconstruction (open reduction internal fixation only, bone graft, free flap, implant, and tissue expansion). Thirty-six subjects underwent reconstruction for penetrating facial trauma. Involved subunits include 24 mandible, 11 malar complex, 13 palate, 18 orbit, and 11 cranium. Predominate reconstruction method was open reduction internal fixation only for mandible (45.8%), bone grafting for malar complex (81.8%), implant for orbit (66.7%) and cranium (63.6%), and local tissue rearrangement for palate (84.6%). The predominate bone graft donor site was iliac for mandible (42.9%), rib for malar complex (36.3%) and orbit (40.0%), and frontal bone for cranium (42.8%). The predominate free flap was osteocutaneous for all mandible, orbit, and cranium and 7 of 10 (70.0%) palate reconstructions. Tissue expansion was used in all subunits except cranium. In conclusion, bone grafting, implants, free tissue transfer, and tissue expansion are all viable reconstruction options for penetrating trauma. There is no single approach to use, and decisions regarding definitive reconstruction method should be based upon anatomical subunit involved and the size/area of defects.

Distribution of skin cancers of the head and neck according to anatomical subunit.

The skin tumors can occur on any part of the body, these anatomical subunits are considered prognostic factors for localized carcinomas. Tumor size is a prognostic criterion that also varies according to the anatomical location of these tumors. Head and neck region is the most common location. This study aimed to investigate the distribution of BCC, SCC, and MM in the anatomical subunits of the head and neck region and their relationships with these anatomical subunits. Patients who underwent surgery for BCC, SCC, BSCC and/or MM in the head and neck region. The head and neck region was divided topographically into the following subunits: scalp, forehead, orbital region, ear and periauricular region, cheeks, nose, perioral region, and neck. Patients were analyzed according to age, sex, and tumor location, type, and size. The SCC group was found to have significantly larger mean tumor size than the BCC group (p = 0.003). SCC was more frequently located in the perioral region (p = 0.001), BCC was more frequently located on the nose (p = 0.001), and MM was more frequently located on the forehead and scalp (p = 0.034, p = 0.49) when compared with the other types. BCC was more frequently located in the orbital region than SCC (p = 0.018) CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we observed statistically significant differences in the distribution of BCC, SCC, and MM, the most common types of skin cancer, among the topographical subunits of the head and neck region.

Comparative study between fisher anatomical subunit approximation technique and millard rotation- advancement technique in unilateral cleft lip repair

ABSTRACT Introduction: The ideal lip repair is characterized by; the symmetrical shape of nasolabial folds and both alae of the nose with a natural-looking philtrum and Cupid’s bow in both static and dynamic states, in addition to a hidden scar. Objective: to compare between Fisher anatomical subunit approximation technique and Millard rotational advancement technique in unilateral cleft lip repair. Methods: Prospective study for 40 patients presented to Alexandria Main University hospital with unilateral cleft lip deformity between March 2019 and October 2020. Twenty patients with unilateral cleft lip deformity were repaired by Fisher anatomical subunit approximation technique, while the other twenty were repaired by Millard rotational-advancement technique. The postoperative photographs of the patients were captured and processed in computer photogrammetry software through which anthropometric parameters including (lip height, lip width, vermilion height, and alar base width) were compared between the normal side and the repaired side. In this software, each anthropometric parameter length on the normal side is taken as a control with a fixed value of (1) then the same parameter on the repaired side was measured as a ratio of this value to avoid bias. Comparison between both groups for assessment of the quality of cleft lip repair was also done based on Steffensen grading criteria. Results: Comparison between both techniques in unilateral cleft lip repair showed that there was no significant difference between them in the anthropometric measurements. While the comparison between the two groups using Steffensen grading criteria showed that Fisher’s technique surpassed Millard’s technique. Conclusion: We recommend the use of the Fisher anatomical subunit approximation technique in unilateral cleft lip repair for its superior results over the Millard rotational advancement technique.

The Operation Rainbow Canada Technique for Unilateral Cleft Lip Revision.

Purpose of this article is to demonstrate the "Operation Rainbow Canada" cleft lip revision technique. This is a surgical technique used by Operation Rainbow Canada on volunteer surgical missions in developing nations. We show how to convert previous Millard or straight line cleft lip repairs to a Fisher anatomic subunit repair, placing a favourable scar along the philtrum. We show a case series of results and explain how this technique gives satisfying aesthetic results for patients seeking unilateral cleft lip revision. This technique combines the principles of the anatomic subunit repair for primary cleft lip repair as described by Fisher and the correction of the cleft nose deformity as described by McComb. We apply these 2 techniques to unilateral cleft lip revision at the same operation. Patients for revision unilateral lip and nose deformities were treated with this technique over the course of several international surgical missions. There were over 90 cases of revisions performed by our group on previous repaired cleft lips. These procedures were done in India, China, and Cambodia. Previously repaired cleft lips can be improved by our revision procedure. We show how incorporating 2 triangular flaps to lengthen the cleft side of the repaired lip can be done in a revision setting. During lip revision, McCombs sutures can be placed to improve the aesthetic of the nose and correct the nasal alar dome.

Anatomic landmark approach to reconstruction of asymmetric midline cleft lip due to Pai syndrome.

Midline clefts of the upper lip are rare, and it is therefore important that surgeons have access to a methodical approach for when these presentations are encountered. We adapted principles of the anatomic subunit approximation for unilateral cleft lip, to the repair of midline clefts. The overt use of anatomic landmarks to define the repair results in a design that inherently adjusts to varying degrees of clefts and can accommodate asymmetries. The “measure twice, cut once” style is an advantage to new surgeons and to surgeons who seldom encounter this presentation. We describe the details of surgical repair in the context of a patient with Pai syndrome and associated nasal hamartomas that resulted in nasolabial asymmetry. This is the first report of surgical outcome following treatment of Pai syndrome and includes early and 5-year follow-up. The system of repair that we describe is applicable to both symmetric and asymmetric midline clefts.

Enhancing the Lateral Orbital "C-Angle" With Calcium Hydroxylapatite: An Anatomic and Clinical Study.

Deliberate injection of specific facial subunits may improve aesthetic outcomes in facial rejuvenation. We contend that the lateral orbital area (LOA) is a key anatomic subunit in the perception of eye attractiveness, with a C-shaped distribution of fat contributing to the formation of a distinct angle in the lateral orbit. The aim of this study was to describe the anatomy of the LOA that constitutes the C-shaped angle and to investigate the safety and cosmetic outcomes of nonsurgical enhancement of that area with calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA). Four injected fresh-frozen cadaver heads were dissected. Twenty patients were enrolled in a prospective clinical study. Participants were seen on the day of injection, and at 2 weeks and 3 months postinjection. Two-dimensional and 3D photographs were analyzed to quantify the volumetric changes between pretreatment and postinjection time points. Secondary outcomes included Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale score and subject satisfaction at 3 months. Cadaver dissections revealed distinct fat compartments and a zone of adhesion forming the C-shaped area around the lateral orbit. In the clinical study, a mean of 1.88 mL of CaHA was injected into each lateral periorbital region. There was 97% and 76% volume retention at 2 weeks and 3 months, respectively, with 70% of patients being "very satisfied" at 3 months. The average Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale rating at 3 months was 3.95. There were no complications. The LOA is a distinct facial subunit that can be enhanced safely by CaHA injection with good cosmetic outcomes. Focusing on the C-angle can improve periorbital aesthetics.

Improvements in Cleft Lip Aesthetics with the Fisher Repair Compared to the Mohler Repair.

Background:The extended Mohler rotation-advancement repair and the Fisher anatomic subunit repair are commonly used for the surgical correction of unilateral cleft lip. The rotation-advancement repair was the initial technique of choice by the senior surgeon. However, due to recurring suboptimal aesthetic results, the senior surgeon transitioned to the anatomic subunit repair. This study was performed to compare the outcomes of the rotation-advancement repair and the anatomic subunit repair.Methods:A retrospective study of all consecutive patients undergoing unilateral cleft lip repair by the senior author between 2009 and 2016 was conducted. Demographic data, the presence of scar shortening/contraction, hypertrophy, widening, and revision rates were recorded.Results:There were 68 patients identified for inclusion. Thirty-four patients had a rotation-advancement repair and 35 had an anatomic subunit repair. Twelve patients (36%) with the rotation-advancement repair and 1 patient (2.9%) with the subunit repair required anterior lip revision (P < 0.001). Conversely, 2 patients (6.1%) with the rotation-advancement repair and 13 patients (37.1%) with the subunit repair required minor debulking of excess red vermilion fullness (P < 0.005).Conclusions:Transitioning from the rotation-advancement repair to the anatomic subunit repair has resulted in improved lip aesthetics with decreased incidence of scar contracture, hypertrophy, and widening as evidenced by a decrease in the revision rate for these suboptimal scars. However, the rate of debulking procedures of the red vermilion did increase early in the adoption of the anatomic subunit repair, requiring minor modifications in the technique.