Anatomic Shoulder Arthroplasty Research Articles

Early Postoperative Pain is Similar after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair versus Short-Stay Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study.

IntroductionOne of the barriers to counseling patients for shoulder arthroplasty (SA) is the anticipated pain after surgery. This can be contrasted with the common perception of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) surgery being less painful due to the less invasive nature of the procedure. We conducted a prospective study comparing postoperative pain levels and narcotic consumption after SA compared to those after RCR. MethodsThis prospective study enrolled 102 patients undergoing short-stay SA and RCR at a single hospital. 50 patients underwent RCR and 52 underwent SA. All participants received a multimodal pain regimen consisting of an interscalene block with liposomal bupivacaine and one of two oral pain medication regimens. Patients were provided a daily pain diary to be completed for 14 postoperative days that tracked pain levels, narcotic consumption, and pain location. Patients were excluded for age <40, revision surgery, SA for fracture, history of chronic opioid use, or an inability to adhere to study protocol. Demographics, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, and pain sensitivity questionnaires (PSQ) were collected preoperatively. Primary study outcomes were daily VAS pain scores and narcotic consumption during the 14 days after surgery. ResultsRCR patients were younger (60.6 vs. 68.9 years; p<0.01) but other demographics, preoperative pain, and PSQ scores were similar between groups. Peak mean VAS pain levels for RCR and SA each occurred on postoperative (POD) 2 and were 4.4 ± 3.1 and 5.1 ± 2.7 respectively (p=0.214). There was no significant difference in VAS pain during the 14-day postoperative period between RCR and SA patients (p>0.05) or between anatomic SA and reverse SA (p>0.05). Narcotic usage was greater for RCR patients at POD 7 (0.5 vs. 0.2 tablets; p=0.039) and 8 (0.5 vs. 0.2 tablets; p=0.015) compared to SA patients. ConclusionsOur study demonstrated that postoperative pain levels do not significantly differ between RCR and short-stay SA, with greater narcotic usage observed for RCR at one week after surgery. These findings support the notion that despite the increased invasiveness of SA, early postoperative pain is comparable with early pain after RCR.

Is revision to anatomic shoulder arthroplasty still an option? A systematic review.

With the historical complications when using total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) to revise failed arthroplasties, and the success of the reverse prosthesis in the revision setting, the question arises whether revision to TSA is still a reasonable option? This systematic review examines revision to TSA and the factors associated with outcomes. A systematic review was performed for studies of TSA used to revise a failed hemiarthroplasty or TSA. The primary outcome was implant failure leading to a repeat revision arthroplasty. Secondary outcomes included visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, shoulder motion and other clinical outcomes of shoulder function. Data were pooled to generate representative frequency-weighted means. Thirteen studies were included, totaling 312 shoulders. Etiologies for revision included glenoid arthrosis (62%), glenoid component failure (36%), and other (2%). Of which, 39% of cases experienced complications and 12% required another arthroplasty revision. Secondary outcomes such as VAS pain, Constant, ASES and UCLA score improved, but none were statistically significant. Unsatisfactory outcomes were higher among patients with glenoid bone loss, instability, and soft tissue deficiencies. Revision to anatomic TSA can be an acceptable option in certain patients. However, the high rate of complications and glenoid loosening, makes this a limited approach for a revision to anatomic TSA procedure.

Modeling highly crosslinked polyethylene vs. non–highly crosslinked polyethylene glenoid revision rates for anatomic shoulder arthroplasty in osteoarthritis including differing polyethylene glenoid fixation designs

BackgroundWe compared anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) for osteoarthritis to both highly crosslinked polyethylene (XLPE) and non–highly crosslinked polyethylene (non-XLPE) to determine the rate of revision for multiple patient and implant characteristics, modeling the effect of variation in glenoid fixation design (glenoid component type). MethodsData from a large national arthroplasty registry were analyzed for the period April 16, 2004, to December 31, 2022. The study population included all primary aTSA (stemmed and stemless shoulder arthroplasty) procedures with a primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis and performed using prostheses in current use. These procedures were grouped into 2 cohorts: all polyethylene-bearing glenoid components with either XLPE or non-XLPE. The cumulative percent revision was determined using Kaplan–Meier estimates of survivorship and hazard ratios from Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for age, sex, humeral head size, humeral fixation, type of primary (total stemmed or stemless anatomic), glenoid component type (modular and nonmodular metal-backed glenoid, cemented polyethylene glenoid, and polyethylene glenoid with modified central peg), and surgeon volume (after 2008). Possible interactions were examined. A subanalysis from January 1, 2017, captured the additional patient demographics of American Society of Anesthesiologists score, body mass index, and glenoid morphology. ResultsOf 11,003 aTSA procedures, the cumulative percent revision at 14 years for all XLPE glenoids (n = 3865) was 5.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.9, 8.7), and 18.7% (95% CI 16.6, 21.0) for non-XLPE (n = 7138). XLPE had a lower rate of revision from 2 years (non-XLPE vs. XLPE 2 years + hazard ratio = 1.66, (95% CI 1.09, 2.53), P = .018) adjusting for age, sex, humeral head size, type of primary, humeral stem fixation, and glenoid component type. Overall, glenoid component type and polyethylene type were strongly associated (P < .001 and P = .021, respectively) with all-cause aTSA revision rates. The difference between non-XLPE and XLPE is observed across all polyethylene glenoid types. When considering procedures performed between 2017 and 2022, XLPE vs. non-XLPE rates of revision were not significantly different with extended adjustment at subanalysis, but loosening did not predominate for non-XLPE until year 6 of follow-up. ConclusionBoth the glenoid design and the type of polyethylene predict the revision rate for aTSA. However, the relative rates of revision between glenoid designs did not differ with polyethylene type. While the polyethylene type was not associated with aTSA revision rates in a more contemporary analysis, the incidence of loosening in non-XLPE prostheses combinations was higher from 6 years may explain this.

Internal rotation-based activities of daily living show limitations following reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus anatomic shoulder arthroplasty

BackgroundOne of the more common limitations after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is limited internal rotation (IR). Outcomes after rTSA are commonly reported as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) but are rarely assessed by specific activities of daily living (ADLs). Analyzing ADLs evaluates for specific motions from PROMs. The purpose of this study is to investigate the deficit in IR following rTSA through ADLs. MethodsA retrospective case-control study was conducted using institutional medical records. Patients who underwent total shoulder arthroplasty between 2009 and 2020 were reviewed for demographic and clinical variables (type of arthroplasty, indication, range of motion and strength). PROMs were taken by phone at 2-year minimum follow-up. Statistics were calculated as two-tailed using Chi-square or simple t-tests as appropriate. ResultsAmong 208 patients, 114 aTSA, and 94 rTSA were identified and included in this study. Both groups reported significant increases in range of motion and strength postoperatively. PROMs were mostly similar between aTSA and rTSA (Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation 83.4 ± 17.1 vs. 82.3 ± 18.4, P = .643; visual analog scale Pain 2.2 ± 2.8 vs. 1.8 ± 2.4, P = .247), while Simple Shoulder Test did show a difference (9.2 ± 2.8 vs. 7.8 ± 3.2, P = .001) with higher scores in the aTSA cohort. The ADLs which showed significant disparity between aTSA and rTSA were toileting (P = .001), donning a coat (P = .017), reaching one’s back (P = .017), as well as throwing overhand (0.013) with rTSA patients reporting more difficulty in all these ADLs. ConclusionBoth aTSA and rTSA are safe and efficacious options for shoulder replacement, as evidenced by high Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation and low visual analog scale pain scores and should be used according to their established indications. Surgeons may counsel rTSA patients about potential increased deficits in ADLs reliant on IR such as managing toileting and dressing compared to aTSA recipients.

Effect of body mass index on complications following total shoulder arthroplasty: a population-wide analysis

BackgroundEvidence regarding the effect of body mass index (BMI) on complications following anatomic shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) remains controversial. This high-powered study examines the effect of BMI on surgical and medical complications following anatomic shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). MethodsThis retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Premier Healthcare Database (PHD) to query all adult patients who underwent primary, elective TSA (aTSA, rTSA) from 2016 to 2020. Patients eligible for inclusion were identified using ICD-10 and CPT codes for primary TSA. Patients were stratified into three subgroups based on BMI (BMI <30 kg/m2, BMI 30-35 kg/m2, BMI > 35 kg/m2). The primary endpoints assessed were 90-day risks of postoperative complications, revisions, and readmissions among the three BMI groups undergoing primary TSA. ResultsA total of 32,645 patients were analyzed; 10,951 patients underwent aTSA and 21,694 patients underwent rTSA. Patient populations for aTSA and rTSA differed significantly across all BMI categories in terms of age, sex, cost of care, and insurance status. After multivariate regression analysis, there was no increased risk of surgical complications in the aTSA and rTSA cohorts with BMI 30-35 kg/m2 and BMI > 35 kg/m2. In the aTSA cohort, rates of acute respiratory failure (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) 2.65) was all significantly higher in the BMI > 35 kg/m2 group. As for rTSA cohort, acute respiratory failure (aOR 1.67) and acute renal failure (aOR 1.53) were significantly higher in the BMI > 35 kg/m2 group. ConclusionWhile we found no increased risk of immediate postoperative surgical risks, patients with a BMI > 35 kg/m2 demonstrated greater risk of medical complications after rTSA. Given this trend, providers should exercise caution in patient selection for TSA and counsel obese patients as to these increased risks. Future studies should aim to provide a more comprehensive picture of the effect of BMI on functional outcomes after TSA.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty with an inverted-bearing prosthesis as revision procedure for failed anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a long-term multicenter study

BackgroundDespite the increasing popularity of revision total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA), studies directly comparing revision RTSA performed for different failed index procedures are limited. We therefore compared the results of revision RTSA between patients with a failed primary anatomic arthroplasty (total shoulder arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty) and those with a failed primary RTSA to explore revision of which index procedure resulted in better long-term clinical outcomes. MethodsIn this prospective, multicenter, observational study, patients underwent revision RTSA using an inverted-bearing prosthesis. We recorded clinical scores, active range of motion, pain, satisfaction, and the rate of scapular notching. Complications and prosthesis survival were also noted. ResultsWe included 45 patients (45 shoulders) with revision RTSA for failed primary anatomic shoulder arthroplasty (30 patients) and RTSA (15 patients). Clinical and radiographic outcomes were recorded from 36 patients at a median follow-up of 101.6 months, and prosthesis survival was assessed from all 45 patients. At final follow-up, clinical scores (P < 0.05), abduction (P = 0.032), re-revision rate (P = 0.018), and prosthesis survival (P = 0.015) were significantly better in patients revised from failed primary anatomic shoulder arthroplasty than those from RTSA. However, pain, satisfaction, and overall complication rates were similar in both groups (P > 0.05). ConclusionsWe found better long-term clinical scores, abduction, and prosthesis survival rates after failed primary anatomic shoulder arthroplasty than after RTSA. Pain reduction and complication rates were comparable in both groups. Thus, anatomic shoulder arthroplasty remains an attractive option for primary arthroplasty in selected cases.

Revision rate in metal compared to ceramic humeral head total shoulder arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty.

Metal and ceramic humeral head bearing surfaces are available choices in anatomical shoulder arthroplasties. Wear studies have shown superior performance of ceramic heads, however comparison of clinical outcomes according to bearing surface in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and hemiarthroplasty (HA) is limited. This study aimed to compare the rates of revision and reoperation following metal and ceramic humeral head TSA and HA using data from the National Joint Registry (NJR), which collects data from England, Wales, Northern Ireland, Isle of Man and the States of Guernsey. NJR shoulder arthroplasty records were linked to Hospital Episode Statistics and the National Mortality Register. TSA and HA performed for osteoarthritis (OA) in patients with an intact rotator cuff were included. Metal and ceramic humeral head prostheses were matched within separate TSA and HA groups using propensity scores based on 12 and 11 characteristics, respectively. The primary outcome was time to first revision and the secondary outcome was non-revision reoperation. A total of 4,799 TSAs (3,578 metal, 1,221 ceramic) and 1,363 HAs (1,020 metal, 343 ceramic) were included. The rate of revision was higher for metal compared with ceramic TSA, hazard ratio (HR) 3.31 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.67 to 6.58). At eight years, prosthesis survival for ceramic TSA was 98.7% (95% CI 97.3 to 99.4) compared with 96.4% (95% CI 95.2 to 97.3) for metal TSA. The majority of revision TSAs were for cuff insufficiency or instability/dislocation. There was no significant difference in the revision rate for ceramic compared with metal head HA (HR 1.33 (95% CI 0.76 to 2.34)). For ceramic HA, eight-year prosthetic survival was 92.8% (95% CI 86.9 to 96.1), compared with 91.6% (95% CI 89.3 to 93.5) for metal HA. The majority of revision HAs were for cuff failure. The rate of all-cause revision was higher following metal compared with ceramic humeral head TSA in patients with OA and an intact rotator cuff. There was no difference in the revision rate for HA according to bearing surface.

Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Versus Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in Primary Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis With Intact Rotator Cuffs: A Meta-Analyses.

Traditional practice favors total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) for the treatment of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (PGHO) with an intact rotator cuff; however, the indications for reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have expanded to include PGHO. The purpose of this systematic review is to compare the mean differences in the range of motion and patient-reported outcomes between the TSA and RSA with an intact rotator cuff and to analyze the subgroup of the Walch type B2 glenoid. This IRB-exempt, PROSPERO-registered systematic review strictly followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. A literature search of five databases revealed 493 articles, of which 10 were included for quantitative synthesis. Level III evidence studies with the diagnosis of PGHO and ≥2 years of follow-up were included. Studies without preoperative and postoperative data were excluded. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to evaluate the methodologic quality of the included studies. Preoperative and postoperative range of motion and patient-reported outcomes were collected. The random-effects model was employed, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. There were a total of 544 and 329 studies in the TSA group and RSA group, respectively. The mean age in the TSA group and RSA groups were 65.36 ± 7.06 and 73.12 ± 2.40, respectively (p = 0.008). The percentages of males in the TSA and RSA groups were 73.2% and 51.1%, respectively (p = 0.02). The mean differences in forward elevation, external rotation in adduction, internal rotation scale, visual analog scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and Single AssessmentNumericEvaluation (SANE) scores were improved for both groups with no significant differences between the two. There were 9.6 times the revisions in the TSA group (8.8% vs. 0.91%; p = 0.014) and 1.5 times the complications in the TSA group (3.68% vs. 2.4%; p = 0.0096). Two hundred and forty-two glenoids were identified as Walch type B2 (126 in the TSA groupand 116 in the RSA group). The mean ages in the B2 subgroup were 68.20 ± 3.25 and 73.03 ± 1.49 for the TSA and RSA, respectively (p = 0.25). The percentages of males in the B2 subgroup were 74.6% and 46.5% for the TSA and RSA groups, respectively (p = 0.0003). The ASES, SANE, forward elevation, and external rotation in the adduction results were descriptively summarized for this subgroup, with average mean differences of 49.0 and 51.2, 45.7 and 66.1, 77.6° and 58.6°, and 38.6° and 34.1° for the TSA and RSA groups, respectively. In the setting of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff, the RSA has a similar range of motion and clinical outcomesbut lower complication and revision rates as compared to the TSA. This may hold true in the setting of the B2 glenoid, although a high-powered study on this subgroup is required. Anatomic shoulder arthroplasty maintains an important role in select patients. Further studies are required to better elucidate the role of glenoid bone loss and posterior humeral head subluxation with regard to implant choice.

Converting to reverse shoulder arthroplasty from primary anatomic shoulder arthroplasty and fracture hemiarthroplasty: a radiographic and clinical outcome analysis at 8-years.

Revision shoulder arthroplasty can be challenging. One of the main considerations for surgeons is the type of implant that was placed in the initial surgery. Anatomic shoulder arthroplasty (ASA) is used for cases of osteoarthritis as well as for fractures of the humeral head. Hemiarthroplasty can be used for complex proximal humerus fractures. The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a difference in clinical and radiographic outcomes between patients that failed primary fracture hemiarthroplasty (FHA), or ASA for osteoarthritis and then required reoperation with a conversion to reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Patients with failed anatomic shoulder replacement, who had undergone conversion to RSA, were enrolled after a mean follow-up of 107 (85-157) months. Two different groups, one with failed ASA implanted for osteoarthritis and one with failed FHA, were created. At follow-up patients were assessed with standard radiographs and clinical outcome scores. Twenty-nine patients (f = 17, m = 12; 51%) suffered from a failed ASA (Group A), while the remaining 28 patients (f = 21, m = 74; 49%) had been revised due to a failed FHA (Group B). Patients of Group B had a poorer Constant score (Group A: 60 vs. Group B: 46; p = 0.02). Abduction (Group A: 115° vs. Group B: 89°; p = 0.02) was worse after conversion of a failed FHA to RSA in comparison to conversions of failed ASA. The mean bone loss of the lateral metaphysis was higher in patients with failed FHA (Group A: 5mm vs. Group B: 20mm; p = 0.0). The initial indication for anatomic shoulder arthroplasty influences the clinical and radiological outcome after conversion to RSA. Conversion of failed FHA to RSA is related to an increased metaphyseal bone loss, decreased range of motion and poorer clinical outcomes when compared to conversions of failed ASA implanted for osteoarthritis. III Retrospective Cohort Comparison Study.

Comparable low revision rates of stemmed and stemless total anatomic shoulder arthroplasties after exclusion of metal-backed glenoid components: a collaboration between the Australian and Danish national shoulder arthroplasty registries

BackgroundThe stemmed anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty is the gold standard in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis. However, the use of stemless total shoulder arthroplasties has increased in recent years. The number of revision procedures are relatively low and therefore it has been recommended that national joint replacement registries should collaborate when comparing revision rates. Therefore, we aimed to compare the revision rates of stemmed and stemless TSA used for the diagnosis of glenohumeral osteoarthritis using data from both the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) and the Danish Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry (DSR). MethodsWe included all patients who were registered in the AOANJRR and the DSR from January 1 2012 to December 2021 with an anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty used for osteoarthritis. Revision for any reason was used as the primary outcome. We used the Kaplan-Meier method to illustrate the cumulative revision rates and a multivariate cox regression model to calculate the hazard ratios. All analyses were performed separately for data from AOANJRR and DSR, and the results were then reported using a qualitative approach. Results13066 arthroplasties from AOANJRR and 2882 arthroplasties from DSR were included. The hazard ratio for revision of stemmed TSA with stemless TSA as reference, adjusted for age and gender, was 1.67 (95% CI 1.34-2.09, p<0.001) in AOANJRR and 0.57 (95% CI 0.36-0.89, p=0.014) in DSR. When including glenoid type and fixation, surface bearing (only in AOANJRR) and hospital volume in the cox regression model the hazard ratio for revision of stemmed TSA compared to stemless TSA was 1.22 (95% CI 0.85-1.75, p=0.286) in AOANJRR and 1.50 (95% CI 0.91-2.45, p=0.109) in DSR. The adjusted hazard ratio for revision of total shoulder arthroplasties with metal backed glenoid components compared to all-polyethylene glenoid components was 2.54 (95% CI 1.70-3.79, p < 0.001) in AOANJRR and 4.1 (95% CI 1.92-8.58, p<0.001) in DSR. ConclusionBased on data from two national shoulder arthroplasty registries, we found no significant difference in risk of revision between stemmed and stemless total shoulder arthroplasties after adjusting for the type of glenoid component. We advocate that metal-backed glenoid components should be used with caution and not on a routine basis.

Anatomic shoulder arthroplasty in patients 40 years or younger

BackgroundGlenohumeral arthritis in adults less than 40 years old represents a challenging clinical scenario to manage. While patients older than 55 have had reproducible success with current shoulder arthroplasty techniques, young patients have historically had less successful outcomes, possibly due to higher physical demands and more complex pathologies. Despite these concerns, anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) remains the treatment of choice for young, active patients with severe glenohumeral arthritis and intact rotator cuff. We hypothesize that TSA provides significant relief in pain and functional outcomes in patients less than 40 years old. MethodsWe performed a single-institution retrospective analysis of consecutive patients aged 40 years and younger who underwent TSA between 2007 and 2022. Demographic data included age, sex, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity index, and preoperative diagnosis. Outcome measures included the Single-Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) score, final range of motion, complications, and revision rate. Statistically significant differences between variables were evaluated using a 2-sample t-test at an α level of P < .05. ResultsTwenty-six TSAs were performed in 23 patients with an average final follow-up of 2 years after the procedure. The average age was 33.4 ± 5.3 years with a range of 19-39 years. The most common preoperative diagnosis was osteoarthritis (46%), followed by rheumatoid arthritis (27%) and osteonecrosis/avascular necrosis (19%). The most common glenoid morphology was type B (15) of which 14 were B2 glenoid, followed by type A (11). The SANE score, mean active forward elevation, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation all improved significantly (P < .05) by the final follow-up. On average, patients in all groups were able to achieve minimal clinically important difference in SANE score after 1 year. There was 1 complication reported of an early postoperative infection treated with irrigation and débridement, and no revision surgeries were performed during the follow-up period. Discussion/ConclusionTSA significantly improved functional outcome measures in patients less than 40 years old with a low rate of complications and revisions in short-term outcomes. As the frequency of TSA continues to increase in adults less than 40 years old, additional studies recording long-term functional outcomes and implant survivorship in this population can be explored.

Anatomic shoulder arthroplasty: the correlation between patient resilience, mental health, and outcome

Recovery from anatomic shoulder arthroplasty may be enhanced in patients with good mental health and the resilience to participate in the prescribed postoperative rehabilitation program. To test this concept, we utilized validated and reliable scales in determining whether resilience and mental health are associated with the outcome of anatomic arthroplasty. 399 patients (195 ream and run (RnR) and 204 anatomic total shoulder (aTSA)) were surveyed at a mean follow-up of 6.3 ± 3.3 years. Preoperative variables included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), history of prior shoulder surgery, diabetes, visual analog scale for pain (VAS), Simple Shoulder Test (SST) scores, and Veteran's RAND-12 Mental Component Score (VR-12 MCS). Outcomes collected included the SST, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES), revision rate, and patient satisfaction. Resilience was documented using the Connor Davidson Resilience Scale-10 (CD RISC-10) at latest follow-up. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were used to identify factors significantly associated with follow-up postoperative SST, ASES and satisfaction. In the univariable analysis, CD RISC-10 was positively correlated with postoperative SST, ASES and satisfaction after both RnR and aTSA. Mean CD RISC-10 scores were higher in the RnR cohort (34.3 ± 4.8 vs. 32.5 ± 6.2 for aTSA, p<0.001). Male sex and lower preoperative VAS were correlated with higher ASES after RnR; VR-12 MCS was positively correlated with all outcomes except SST after RnR. In the multivariable linear regression analysis, CD RISC-10 was independently associated with postoperative SST, ASES and satisfaction scores in aTSA patients. In the RnR cohort, CD RISC-10 was only correlated with satisfaction. VR-12 MCS was correlated with ASES and satisfaction after RnR. In this study of anatomic arthroplasties, increased resilience and better mental health were correlated with better outcomes. RnR patients had higher resilience than aTSA patients. Greater resilience was associated with better outcomes after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Better mental health was associated with superior outcomes after the ream and run procedure.

Patient-reported outcomes following total shoulder arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty: an analysis of data from the National Joint Registry

IntroductionTotal shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and hemiarthroplasty (HA) are used in the management of end stage glenohumeral arthritis. Improvement in shoulder function and resolution of symptoms are high priorities for patients. The aim of this study was to compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following TSA and HA. MethodRecords from the National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man were linked to the PROMs dataset. The study included anatomical shoulder arthroplasties performed for osteoarthritis in patients with an intact rotator cuff. Patients with preoperative and postoperative Oxford Shoulder Scores (OSSs) were included. The improvement in OSS at 6 months and 5 years, and the trend in scores over time were analyzed for each prosthesis. A cohort of 2,002 patients were matched on 10 variables using propensity scores. OSSs at 6 months following TSA versus HA were compared in the matched sample. ResultsThere was a significant improvement in the OSS in both groups (p<0.001). At 6 months the OSSs were superior following TSA compared to HA (median 42 vs 36, p<0.001). The median score at 5 years was 44 following TSA and 35 following HA. Score distributions were skewed towards the maximum score. The highest possible score (48) was achieved in 28% (134/478) of TSAs and 9% (20/235) of HAs at 5 years. The improvement in the preoperative to 6-month OSS reached the minimal clinically important difference of 5.5 in 92% (1653/1792) of TSAs and 80% (416/523) of HAs. At 5 years this improvement was maintained in 91% (339/374) of TSAs and 78% (136/174) of HAs. ConclusionTSA resulted in superior OSSs at 6 months in patients with osteoarthritis. The median OSS improved from 6 months to 5 years following TSA, however there was a small decline in scores following HA. A ceiling effect was shown in the OSS following TSA at 5 years.

A stemless anatomic shoulder arthroplasty design provides increased cortical medial calcar bone loading in variable bone densities compared to a short stem implant

Several studies have reported proximal bone resorption in stemless and press-fit short-stem humeral implants for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this biomechanical study was to evaluate implant and cortical bone micromotion of a cortical rim-supported stemless implant compared to a press-fit short stem implant during cyclic loading and static compression testing. Thirty cadaveric humeri were assigned to 3 groups based on a previously performed density analysis, adopting the metaphyseal and epiphyseal and inferior supporting bone densities for multivariate analyses. Implant fixation was performed in stemless implant in low bone density (SL-L, n=10) or short stem implant in low bone density (Stem-L, n=10) and in stemless implant in high bone density (SL-H, n=10). Cyclic loading with 220 N, 520 N, and 820 N over 1000 cycles at 1.5 Hz was performed with a constant valley load of 25 N. Optical recording allowed for spatial implant tracking and quantification of cortical bone deformations in the medial calcar bone region. Implant micromotion was measured as rotational and translational displacement. Load-to-failure testing was performed at a rate of 1.5 mm/s with ultimate load and stiffness measured. The SL-H group demonstrated significantly reduced implant micromotion compared to both low-density groups (SL-L: P=.014; Stem-L: P=.031). The Stem-L group showed significantly reduced rotational motion and variance in the test results at the 820-N load level compared to the SL-L group (equal variance: P=.012). Implant micromotion and reversible bone deformation were significantly affected by increasing load (P<.001), metaphyseal cancellous (P=.023, P=.013), and inferior supporting bone density (P=.016, P=.023). Absolute cortical bone deformation was significantly increased with stemless implants in lower densities and percentage reversible bone deformation was significantly higher for the SL-H group (21±7%) compared to the Stem-L group (12±6%, P=.017). A cortical rim-supported stemless implant maintained proximally improved dynamic bone loading in variable bone densities compared to a press-fit short stem implant. Biomechanical time-zero implant micromotion in lower bone densities was comparable between short stem and stemless implants at rehabilitation load levels (220 N, 520 N), but with higher cyclic stability and reduced variability for stemmed implantation at daily peak loads (820 N).

Cemented vs. press-fit humeral stems: a matched cohort analysis at a mean follow-up of 10 years

IntroductionWhile cementation of humeral stems has long been considered the gold standard for anatomic shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA), cementless, or press-fit, fixation offers a relatively cheaper and less demanding alternative, particularly in the setting of a revision procedure. However, this approach has been accompanied by concerns of implant loosening and high rates of radiolucency. In the present study we performed a propensity matched comparison of clinical and patient-reported outcomes between cemented and cementless fixation techniques for aTSA. MethodsThis study was a retrospective comparison of 50 shoulders undergoing aTSA: 25 using cemented humeral fixation versus 25 using press-fit humeral fixation. Patients in the two groups were propensity matched according to age, sex, and preoperative ASES score. Primary outcome measures included range of motion (ROM) (forward elevation, external rotation, internal rotation), patient reported outcomes (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Visual Analog Scores (VAS)), and implant survival. ResultsAt baseline, the two fixation groups were similar in regard to age, sex, BMI, preoperative ASES score, and surgical indication. Mean follow-up was 11.7 ± 4.95 years in the cemented cohort and 9.13 ± 3.77 years in the press-fit cohort (p=0.045). Both groups demonstrated significant improvements postoperatively in all included ROM and patient-reported outcomes. However, press-fit patients reported significantly better VAS, ASES, and SST scores. Mean VAS pain score was 1.1 ± 1.8 in press-fit patients and 3.2 ± 3.0 in cemented patients (p=0.005). The mean ASES score was 87.7 ± 12.4 in press-fit patients and 69.5 ± 22.7 in cemented patients (p=0.002). Lastly, the mean SST score was 9.8 ± 3.1 in press-fit patients and 7.7 ± 3.7 in cemented patients (p=0.040). Both fixation techniques provided lasting implant survivorship with only a single revision operation in each of the cohorts. ConclusionHerein, we provide a propensity matched, long-term comparison of patients receiving anatomic shoulder arthroplasty stratified according to humeral stem fixation technique. The results of this analysis illustrate that both types of humeral fixation techniques yield durable and significant improvements in shoulder function with similar rates of survival at 10 years of follow-up.

Effect of vitamin E–enhanced highly cross-linked polyethylene on wear rate and particle debris in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical comparison to ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene

Particle-induced osteolysis resulting from polyethylene wear remains a source of implant failure in anatomic total shoulder designs. Modern polyethylene components are irradiated in an oxygen-free environment to induce cross-linking, but reducing the resulting free radicals with melting or heat annealing can compromise the component's mechanical properties. Vitamin E has been introduced as an adjuvant to thermal treatments. Anatomic shoulder arthroplasty models with a ceramic head component have demonstrated that vitamin E-enhanced polyethylene show improved wear compared with highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE). This study aimed to assess the biomechanical wear properties and particle size characteristics of a novel vitamin E-enhanced highly cross-linked polyethylene (VEXPE) glenoid compared to a conventional ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) glenoid against a cobalt chromium molybdenum (CoCrMo) head component. Biomechanical wear testing was performed to compare the VEXPE glenoid to UHMWPE glenoid with regard to pristine polyethylene wear and abrasive endurance against a polished CoCrMo alloy humeral head in an anatomic shoulder wear-simulation model. Cumulative mass loss (milligrams) was recorded, and wear rate calculated (milligrams per megacycle [Mc]). Under pristine wear conditions, particle analysis was performed, and functional biologic activity (FBA) was calculated to estimate particle debris osteolytic potential. In addition, 95% confidence intervals for all testing conditions were calculated. The average pristine wear rate was statistically significantly lower for the VEXPE glenoid compared with the HXLPE glenoid (0.81 ± 0.64 mg/Mc vs. 7.00 ± 0.45 mg/Mc) (P<.05). Under abrasive wear conditions, the VEXPE glenoid had a statistically significant lower average wear rate compared with the UHMWPE glenoid comparator device (18.93 ± 5.80 mg/Mc vs. 40.47 ± 2.63 mg/Mc) (P<.05). The VEXPE glenoid demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in FBA compared with the HXLPE glenoid (0.21 ± 0.21 vs. 1.54 ± 0.49 (P<.05). A newanatomic glenoid component with VEXPE demonstrated significantly improved pristine and abrasive wear properties with lower osteolytic particle debris potential compared with a conventional UHMWPE glenoid component. Vitamin E-enhanced polyethylene shows early promise in shoulder arthroplasty components. Long-term clinical and radiographic investigation needs to be performed to verify if these biomechanical wear properties translate to diminished long-term wear, osteolysis, and loosening.

Reverse and Anatomic Shoulder Arthroplasty Regional Usage and Open Payment Analysis Using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Database.

This retrospective review aimed to assess if open payments made by industry arthroplasty companies to physicians and hospital systems were significantly affected by implant type and geographic variation. Data was obtained from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) publicly available open payment datasets (2016-2019). Geographic locations were identified using regions as defined by the US Census Bureau. A linear regression was calculated to predict the open payment made based on the created variable region, the most used implant type (reverse vs anatomic, n > 30 to be included), and their hypothesized interaction. A significant regression equation was found for the hypothesized interaction between implant and region, F(13,11 186) = 3.446, P < .0001, with an R2 of 0.005. Within the regression, the implant type alone was not significantly related to the open payment (P = .070) but only became significant when paired with the region in the South (US$5807; P < .0001) and West (US$5638; P = .0012) compared to the Northeast. Our multivariate linear regression model revealed that reverse total shoulder implants were associated with higher open payments, but only within the South and West regions. This indicates that the contributions made by industry arthroplasty companies are a function of both implant and region.

A secular radiographic change around uncemented humeral stem after shoulder arthroplasty – more than 8 years follow-up

BackgroundRadiolucent lines (RLLs) are commonly seen on the humerus after uncemented shoulder arthroplasty. However, long-term changes to humeral reactions, including RLL, remain unclear. This study investigated long-term chronological changes around the humeral stem, including RLL, after anatomic shoulder arthroplasty. MethodsTwenty-four shoulders after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty or humeral head replacement using an uncemented standard humeral stem conducted between 2005 and 2012 with ≥8 years of follow-up were retrospectively evaluated at 2 years, 5 years, and final follow-up. Radiographic changes including RLL, distal sclerosis, and bone resorption were evaluated. ResultsMean final follow-up was 10.7 ± 1.6 years. The number of cases showing RLL gradually decreased over time from 19 cases (79.2%) to 15 cases (62.5%), to 10 cases (41.7%) between 2 years, 5 years, and long-term follow-up >8 years. Sclerosis at the tip of the stem increased significantly from only 1 case to 15 cases between 2 years and long-term. Bone resorption exceeding grade 4 was found in 2 of 24 cases (8.2%) at a final follow-up. ConclusionRLL on the humerus around the cementless on-growth standard stem in shoulder arthroplasty at short-term follow-up did not necessarily elicit long-term loosening. In addition, distal RLL tended to improve over the long term and finally change into distal sclerosis.

Evaluating trunnionosis in modular anatomic shoulder arthroplasties: a retrieval study.

Shoulder arthroplasty procedures are widely indicated, and the number of shoulder arthroplasty procedures has drastically increased over the years. Rapid expansion of the utilization of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty has outpaced the more modest growth of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) while shoulder hemiarthroplasty (HA) has trended down. Recently, shoulder prostheses have transitioned to increasingly modular systems offering more individualized options with the potential for decreased pain and increased range of motion. However, increased primary procedures has resulted in increased revision surgeries, with one potential cause being fretting and corrosion damage within these modular systems. Following institutional review board approval, 130 retrieved aTSA and 135 HA explants were identified through database query. Humeral stem and head components were included in all 265 explants, whereas 108 included polyethylene glenoid liner components. All explanted components were macroscopically evaluated for standard damage modes, and taper junctions were microscopically examined for fretting/corrosion using a modified Goldberg-Cusick classification system that was 4-quadrant graded for both the male and female component. Medical records were reviewed for patient demographics and surgical information. In this series, 158 of explants were from female patients (male=107), and 162 explants were from the right shoulder. Average age at implantation was 61 years (range: 24-83), average age at explanation was 66 years (range, 32-90), and average duration of implantation was 61.4 months (range, 0.5-240). Scratching, edge deformation, and burnishing were the most commonly observed standard damage modes. Of the 265 explants, 146 had a male stem component vs. 118 with a female stem component. Average summed fretting grades on male and female stem components were 8.3 and 5.9, respectively (P<.001). Average summed corrosion grades for male and female stem components were 8.2 and 6.2, respectively (P<.001). Wider male tapers (>11 mm) showed significantly less fretting and corrosion (P<.001). Lastly, mismatched metal compositions between the head and stem components showed greater fretting and corrosion damage (P=.002). In this series of 265 aTSA and HA explants, there was substantial damage present on the explanted components. All components demonstrated macroscopic damage. In this retrieval study, small-tapered male stems with small, thin female heads and mismatched metal composition between components were risk factors for increased implant wear. As shoulder arthroplasty volume increases, optimizing design is paramount for long-term success. Additional work could determine the clinical significance of these findings.

Mid-term outcomes following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

The utilization of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty now exceeds the incidence of anatomic shoulder arthroplasty. Previous mid-to-long-term studies on rTSA have reported a decrease in shoulder function as follow-up increased. The purpose of this study was to provide data on mid-term outcomes and implant survival in a series focusing on reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Demographic information such as age at surgery, revision surgery status, BMI, and smoking status were recorded. The clinical endpoints measured in this study were range of motion scores (forward elevation, external rotation, internal rotation) and patient reported outcomes (VAS, ASES, SST). Radiographic variables captured included preoperative glenoid morphology, humeral lucency, and glenoid loosening. Fifty-six shoulders were included in this study. The overall mean age at surgery was 72.5 ± 7.2years with an average follow-up time of 6.8 ± 3.5years. The mean BMI was 28.1 ± 5.5. All measurements of range of motion saw significant and sustained improvements. Overall, forward elevation improved from 82° preoperatively to 133° postoperatively (p < 0.01). External rotation improved from 23° preoperatively to 36° (p < 0.01), while internal rotation improved from L3 to L1 (p = 0.05). ASES scores improved from 31 preoperatively to 70 postoperatively (p < 0.01). SST scores improved from 2 preoperatively to 7 (p < 0.01). VAS pain index scores improved from 6 to 2 following surgery (p < 0.01). Postoperative scapular notching was seen in 18 patients at final follow-up. Glenoid loosening was seen in 3 shoulders. Humeral loosening was seen in 18 shoulders. Tuberosity resorption was seen in 8 shoulders. The 5year survival estimate was 98%, and the 10year survival estimate was 83%. In this series, we found that rTSA provides mid-term improvements in range of motion in patients while reducing pain levels. When considered together, this demonstrates that most patients undergoing rTSA can have excellent use of their shoulder from age at surgery to end-of-life.