Anatomic Hip Center Research Articles

Total Hip Arthroplasty in Protrusio Acetabuli: A Systematic Review.

Protrusio acetabuli, or abnormal protrusion of the femoral head into the acetabulum, requires performance of a total hip arthroplasty (THA) for which various reconstruction techniques and outcomes have been described. The aim of this systematic review is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the current evidence, evaluate treatment efficacy, compare surgical techniques, and identify topics for future research along with improving evidence-based decision-making, improving patient outcomes in the management of this condition. A thorough systematic review of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library databases, and Scopus library was conducted, and articles describing techniques of THA for treatment of protrusion acetabuli were extracted. The initial search generated 751 results. After exclusion, 18 articles were included. Of these, eight were prospective studies and 10 were retrospective. Surgery was performed on 783 hips with a mean age of 60 years; 80% of females who mostly had inflammatory arthritis were followed up for 8.86 years (range, 2-15.4 years). Good outcomes have been achieved with THA using uncemented cups with bone graft; however, no conclusion could be drawn with regard to the femoral side. It can be concluded that the concept of restoration of the anatomical hip center of rotation is paramount for good outcome and better survival of the implant is important when using uncemented cups with a bone graft. In addition, screw augmentation for fixation is not recommended unless absolutely necessary. The most common complications were aseptic loosening and heterotopic ossification. While the former required revision, conservative management was administered for the latter.

Computer simulation study of cementless cup placement for dysplastic hip osteoarthritis using subluxation percentage of Crowe classification.

It is often difficult to achieve adequate bone coverage of the cup in total hip arthroplasty in cases of severe developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between subluxation percentage of Crowe classification and cup center-edge (cup-CE) angle to investigate whether subluxation percentage according to the Crowe classification is a useful indicator for cementless cup placement. Cementless cup placement was simulated in 77 women with DDH in 91 hips (Crowe I, 35 hips; Crowe II, 35 hips; and Crowe III, 21 hips) using computed tomography-based computer simulation software. The cups were placed at the anatomic hip center (AHC) and 10-mm high hip center (HHC). The relationship between the subluxation percentage and cup-CE angle was evaluated using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. In addition, the cutoff values for the subluxation percentage that satisfied a cup-CE angle ≥0° were determined using the receiving operating characteristic curve. The cup-CE angle was negatively correlated with the subluxation percentage in both AHC and 10-mm HHC (correlation coefficient ρ = -0.542 [p < 0.01] and -0.704 [p < 0.01], respectively). The cutoff values for subluxation percentage that satisfied a cup-CE angle ≥0° were 56.1% and 73.6% for AHC and 10-mm HHC, respectively. Cementless cup placement in AHC is difficult in cases with the subluxation percentage ≥56.1%, and HHC reconstruction or femoral structural autograft technique should be considered as an alternative. Moreover, placement at 10 mm above AHC is difficult in cases with subluxation percentage ≥73.6%.

Application of high hip center technique in total hip arthroplasty in patients with Crowe typeⅡand Ⅲ developmental dysplasia of hip and severe hip osteoarthritis

To explore the clinical efficacy of high hip center technique total hip arthroplasty （THA） for Crowe Ⅱand Ⅲ developmental dysplasia of hip （DDH） and severe hip osteoarthritis （HOA）. From January 2018 to January 2020, 74 patients with Crowe typeⅡand Ⅲ DDH and severe HOA were admitted, and 37 cases of anatomical hip center reconstruction were taken as control group, including 7 males and 30 females, aged from 42 to 65 years old with an average of （58.40±4.98） years old, body mass index （BMI） ranged from 18 to 29 kg·m-2 with an average of （23.02±2.21） kg·m-2. Thirty-seven routine high hip center technical reconstruction were performed as study group, including 5 males and 32 females, aged from 41 to 65 years old with an average of （57.31±5.42） years old, BMI ranged from 18 to 29 kg·m-2 with an average of （23.14±2.07） kg·m-2. The patients presented with hip pain, limited function and range of motion, and gait instability before surgery. All patients underwent THA, the control group underwent intraoperative anatomical hip center reconstruction, and the study group underwent intraoperative high hip joint reconstruction. The perioperative indicators of the two groups were compared. The hip joint function, balance function and gait of the patients were evaluated before surgery, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery. The length difference of both lower limbs, horizontal distance of rotation center, vertical distance of rotation center and femoral eccentricity were measured before operation and 1 year after operation. The incidence of complications in the two groups during the operation and postoperative follow-up was counted. The operation time of the study group was shorter than that of the control group, and the intraoperative blood loss was less than that of the control group （P<0.05）. After 12-months follow-up, 1 was lost to followvup in study group and 2 were lost to follow-up in control group. The Harris scores and Berg balance scale（BBS）, pace, stride frequency and single step length in the study group were higher than those in the control group at 3 months and 6 months after operation （P<0.05）；there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the indexes 12 months after operation （P>0.05）. The vertical distance of the center of rotation of the study group was greater than that of the control group 12 months after operation （P<0.05）, and there was no significant difference in the length difference of the lower limbs, the horizontal distance of the center of rotation, and the femoral eccentricity between two groups （P>0.05）. There were no complications in either group. The long-term effects of THA in patients with DDH and severe HOA were similar between the two central hip reconstruction methods, and the safety was good, and the high hip central reconstruction technique could shorten the operation time and reduce the amount of intraoperative blood loss.At the same time, it has certain advantages in early recovery of hip joint function, balance function and walking function of patients.

Sagittal-spinopelvic alignment improves in patients with bilateral highly dislocated hip (Crowe type IV) after subtrochanteric shortening total hip arthroplasty: A retrospective radiographic study.

In patients with bilateral highly dislocated hips (HDHs), total hip arthroplasty with subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy (S-THA) is a viable option for achieving adequate reconstruction with restoration of the anatomical hip center. This procedure has the potential to improve sagittal spinopelvic alignment (SSPA). However, reports are scarce owing to the rarity of this disease. The objective of this study is to investigate pre- and post-operative SSPA in patients with HDHs who had undergone S-THA. This retrospective radiographic study included 55 patients (54 females and 1 male; average age, 63.1 ± 6.9 years) who underwent S-THA. Lateral spine radiographs in the standing position were obtained pre- and post-operatively. The SSPA included lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), pelvic incidence (PI), and intervertebral disc (ID) angle of L1/2-L5/S. The SSPA pre- and post-S-THA was compared using a paired t test. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to assess the relationships between parameters. The mean pre- and post-operative LL and SS values were 62° and 49° (LL) and 50° and 39° (SS), respectively (P < .001). The ID angle was significantly reduced post-operatively at all levels (P < .001). The correlation coefficients between preoperative LL and SS and postoperative LL and PI were 0.81 and 0.38, respectively (P < .01). The preoperative SSPA of Crowe type IV HDHs revealed excessive pelvic anteversion and lumbar hyperlordosis, with a high correlation between LL and SS, suggesting that these alterations were compensatory changes to maintain body balance. Furthermore, in patients with HDHs and residual spinal flexibility, restoring the original pelvic morphology with S-THA may contribute to improved SSPA.

Cementless total hip replacement for hip dysplasia: anatomical hip center is associated with better patient-reported functional outcome

Background Total hip arthroplasty in patients with dysplastic hips is a challenging procedure. The main goal of surgery is to achieve anatomical center of rotation to improve the abductor function, patient satisfaction, and implant survival. The aim of this study was to report the mid-term functional results using the Oxford hip score (OHS) after cementless total hip replacement (THR). Patients and methods This was a retrospective analysis of the prospectively collected data of patients who had a THR done at our institution with hip dysplasia. Between September 2011 and December 2019, a total of 23 consecutive patients (26 hips) with Crowe II–IV developmental dysplasia were treated with primary cementless THR. The mean age for patients included were 34.1 ± 15.2 years. Females were more than males. The left side was operated more than the right side, and there were three bilateral cases. The mean preoperative OHS was 21 ± 6.6 points. Results All patients were followed up for a mean of 3.4 ± 2.6 years (range, 1–11 years). None of the cases were lost to follow-up. The mean OHS improved significantly from 21.2 ± 6.6 points (range, 8–38) preoperatively to 40.9 ± 4.8 points (range, 28–48) in the final OHS (Z=4.45, P<0.001). Regarding the final OHS, both Crowe types II and III were better than Crowe type IV, and the difference was statistically significant. The functional leg length discrepancy improved from a median of 3 (0–7) cm preoperatively to 0 (0–3) cm postoperatively (Z=4.3, P<0.0001). All cases that required shortening were Crowe IV dysplasia (five cases). A total of 22 (88%) hips were reconstructed within 2 cm of the other hip. Conclusion Restoration of anatomic center of rotation as close as possible was associated with better functional outcome. Cementless fixation was possible in all cases.

Cup Overhanging in Anatomic Socket Position or High Hip Center of Rotation in Total Hip Arthroplasty for Crowe III and IV Dysplasia: A CT-Based Simulation.

Cup overhanging in total hip arthroplasty is a predisposing factor to iliopsoas impingement. In dysplastic hips, cup implantation was simulated in an anatomic hip center of rotation (AHCR) and in high hip center (HHCR). We sought to assess: (1) the percentage of prominent cups; (2) quantify the cup protrusion at different sites on frontal, axial and sagittal views. In 40 Crowe III-IV hips, using a 3D CT-based planning software, cup planning in AHCR and HHCR (CR height ≥ 20 mm) was performed for every hip. Cup prominence was assessed on every plane. HHCR cups were less anteverted (p < 0.01), less medialized (p < 0.001) and less caudal (p = 0.01) than AHCR sockets. AHCR cups were more frequently prominent on at least one plane (92.5% vs. 77.5%), with minimal agreement between the two configurations (k = 0.31, p = 0.07). AHCR cups protruded more than HHCR sockets in the sagittal (p = 0.02) and axial planes (p < 0.001). Axially, at the center of the cup, prominence 6−11 mm occurred in nine (22.5%) AHCR and one (2.5%) HHCR socket. In conclusion, while a routine high hip center should not be recommended, cup placement at a center of rotation height < 20 mm is associated with higher rates and magnitudes of anterior cup protrusion in severe dysplasia.

Does total hip arthroplasty with high hip centre in dysplasia compromise acetabular bone stock?

The placement of uncemented acetabular components during total hip arthroplasty (THA) in Crowe II and Crowe III dysplasia can be at the anatomic or high hip centre position. Using computerised tomography data, we simulated acetabular cup placement at the anatomic hip centre and the high hip centre positions to assess whether there is a difference between the 2 in terms of bone loss from acetabular reaming and in acetabular coverage by host bone. The study population included a consecutive cohort of 19 patients (22 hips) with Crowe II or III dysplasia. 3-dimensional models of the pelvis were created for each patient and digital templating was used to determine the anatomic and high hip centre positions. The coordinates of the digitally templated cup positions were fed into an image processing software to estimate the amount of bone reamed, the cup coverage by host bone and the elevation from tear drop. The mean volume of bone reamed was greater in the high hip centre position as compared to the anatomic position (27.3 ± 11. 4 cm3 vs. 19.4 ± 12.2 cm3, p < 0.0001). The coverage of the acetabular cup by host bone was greater in the high hip centre position (87.3 ± 5.9% vs. 68.3 ± 10%). The mean elevation in the high hip centre group was 13 mm with 3 hips having a breach of the medial wall. In Crowe II and III dysplasia, placement of acetabular cups at the anatomic hip centre better preserves bone stock as compared to high hip centre placement and should be preferred in young patients requiring THA.

Does Cup Position at the High Hip Center or Anatomic Hip Center in THA for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Result in Better Harris Hip Scores and Revision Incidence? A Systematic Review.

One goal of THA is to restore the anatomic hip center, which can be achieved in hips with developmental dysplasia by placing cups at the level of the native acetabulum. However, this might require adjuvant procedures such as femoral shortening osteotomy. Another option is to place the cup at the high hip center, potentially reducing surgical complexity. Currently, no clear consensus exists regarding which of these cup positions might offer better functional outcomes or long-term survival. We performed a systematic review to determine whether (1) functional outcomes as measured by the Harris hip score, (2) revision incidence, and (3) complications that do not result in revision differ based on the position of the acetabular cup (high hip center versus anatomic hip center) in patients undergoing THA for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). We performed a systematic review using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, including studies comparing the functional outcomes, revision incidence, and complications of primary THA in dysplastic hips with acetabular cups placed at the high hip center versus those placed at the anatomic hip center, over any time frame. The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (registration number CRD42020168183) before commencement. Of 238 records, eight comparative, retrospective nonrandomized studies of interventions were eligible for our systematic review, reporting on 207 hips with cups placed at the high hip center and 268 hips with cups at the anatomic hip center. Risk of bias within eligible studies was assessed using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool. Due to low comparability between studies, data could not be pooled, so these studies were assessed without summary effects. Six studies compared Harris hip scores, two of which favored high hip center cup placement and three of which favored anatomic hip center cup placement, although none of the differences between cohorts met the minimum clinically important difference. Five studies reliably compared revision incidence, which ranged from 2% to 9% for high hip center at 7 to 15 years and 0% to 5.9% for anatomic hip center at 6 to 16 years. Five studies reported intra- and postoperative complications, with the high hip center being associated with higher incidence of dislocation and lower incidence of neurological complications. No clear difference was observed in intraoperative complications between the high hip center and anatomic hip center. No obvious differences could be observed in Harris hip score or revision incidence after THA for osteoarthritis secondary to DDH between cups placed at the anatomic hip center and those placed at the high hip center. Placement of the acetabular cup in the high hip center may lead to higher risk of dislocation but lower risk of neurologic complications, although no difference in intraoperative complications was observed. Surgeons should be able to achieve satisfactory functional scores and revision incidence using either technique, although they should be aware of how their choice influences hip biomechanics and the need for adjunct procedures and associated risks and operative time. These recommendations should be considered with respect to the several limitations in the studies reviewed, including the presence of serious confounding factors and selection biases, inconsistent definitions of the high hip center, variations in dysplasia severity, small sample sizes, and follow-up periods. These weaknesses should be addressed in well-designed future studies. Level III, therapeutic study.

CORR Insights®: Does Cup Position at the High Hip Center or Anatomic Hip Center in THA for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Result in Better Harris Hip Scores and Revision Incidence? A Systematic Review.

CORR Insights®: Does Cup Position at the High Hip Center or Anatomic Hip Center in THA for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Result in Better Harris Hip Scores and Revision Incidence? A Systematic Review.

Long-term results of medial open reduction surgery on pelvic and hip kinematics in children with developmental hip dislocation:A pilot study

Total hip arthroplasty in severe dysplasia is challenging due to diminished periacetabular bone stock and the highly placed femoral head. Although anatomical reconstruction of the hip, with required interventions such as subtrochanteric osteotomy and graft usage, is the main aim of the procedure, good long-term clinical outcomes of the high hip center technique have also been reported. Information regarding the effect of hip center placement on gait characteristics is limited; therefore, the aim of this study is to analyze the differences in gait parameters between the high hip center technique and anatomical reconstruction of the hip.Twenty patients (40 hips) with bilateral Crowe type III-IV developmental dysplasia of the hip who underwent bilateral total hip arthroplasty and completed at least 2 years of follow-up were included. Group 1 comprised 10 patients (20 hips) who underwent anatomical hip center reconstruction, while group 2 comprised 10 patients (20 hips) who underwent high hip center reconstruction. The gait characteristics of patients were examined through markers placed in certain anatomical regions, the cameras placed around, and the force plates embedded in the walking platform.There was no significant difference in the gait characteristics according to the location of the hip rotation center. The mean temporospatial, kinematic, and kinetic values were similar between the groups. The most prominent difference was in the peak dynamic hip extension, which was lower in group 2 (−9.71° ± 7.46°) compared to group 1 (−6.80° ± 11.44°), although it was not statistically significant (P = .09).The bilateral high hip center technique can provide similar gait characteristics as anatomical reconstruction and may be preferred in particularly difficult cases based on the surgeon’s decision.

Tantalum Augments Combined with Antiprotrusio Cages for Massive Acetabular Defects in Revision Arthroplasty

BackgroundTantalum components have gained popularity for the management of Paprosky type IIIA and IIIB defects during revision total hip arthroplasty. Although the use of antiprotrusio cages solely shows suboptimal results, there are certain defects that still require their use. We hypothesized that combining tantalum augments and an antiprotrusio cage would (1) improve radiographic stability, (2) enhance survivorship, (3) decrease complications, and (4) improve clinical outcomes. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 20 patients with Paprosky type IIIA or IIIB defects who underwent revision of the acetabular component with a highly porous tantalum augment and an antiprotrusio cage combination. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs, survivorship free from aseptic component revision, and the Harris Hip Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and Short Form-36 scores were analyzed. The mean follow-up was 2.8 years. ResultsAt the most recent follow-up, no antiprotrusio cages had migrated and all tantalum augments had radiographic evidence of osseointegration. In addition, only 2 components were revised for aseptic etiologies and only 1 was loose. Both were revised secondary to failures of the inferior flange of the antiprotrusio cage. All clinical outcome scores significantly improved postoperatively. Finally, the risk of major postoperative complications was noted to be 10%. ConclusionsIn summary, a tantalum augment combined with an antiprotrusio cage in Paprosky IIIA and IIIB defects with divergent anatomy not amenable to a hemispherical socket provides a reliable technique to restore the anatomic hip center and prevent superior migration and provides a bony ingrowth surface. Longer term follow-up is required before the technique is widely adapted. Level of EvidenceLevel IV, therapeutic studies.

Total Hip Arthroplasty for Crowe Type IV Hip Dysplasia: Surgical Techniques and Postoperative Complications.

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) of Crowe type IV developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is challenging. Although traditional (lateral, posterolateral, and posterior) THA approaches have been used with great anatomic success, they damage periarticular muscles, which are already quite weak in type IV DDH. The recently developed direct anterior approach (DAA) can provide an inter‐nerve and inter‐muscle approach for THA of type IV dysplasia hips. However, femur exposure with the DAA could be difficult during surgery and it is hard to apply femoral shortening osteotomy. THA techniques used for type IV DDH include anatomic hip center techniques (true acetabular reconstruction) and high hip center techniques, wherein an acetabulum is reconstructed above the original one. Although anatomic construction of the hip center is considered “the gold standard” treatment, it is impossible if the anatomical acetabular is too small and shallow. Procedures used to support type IV DDH reduction with anatomic hip center techniques include greater trochanter osteotomy, lesser trochanter osteotomy, and subtrochanteric osteotomy. However, these techniques have yet to be standardized, and it is unclear which is best for type IV DDH. One‐state and two‐state non‐osteotomy reduction techniques have also been introduced to treat type IV DDH. Potential complications of THA performed in patients with type IV DDH include leg length discrepancy (LLD), peri‐operative femur fracture, nonunion of the osteotomy site, and nerve injury. It is worth noting that nowadays an increasing number of Crowe type IV DDH patients are more sensitive to postoperative LLD.

Bilateral High Hip Center Provides Gait Parameters Similar to Anatomical Reconstruction: A Gait Analysis Study in Hip Replacement Patients With Bilateral Developmental Dysplasia

BackgroundTotal hip arthroplasty in severe dysplasia is challenging due to diminished periacetabular bone stock and the highly placed femoral head. Although anatomical reconstruction of the hip, with required interventions such as subtrochanteric osteotomy and graft usage, is the main aim of the procedure, good long-term clinical outcomes of the high hip center technique have also been reported. Information regarding the effect of hip center placement on gait characteristics is limited; therefore, the aim of this study is to analyze the differences in gait parameters between the high hip center technique and anatomical reconstruction of the hip. MethodsTwenty patients (40 hips) with bilateral Crowe type III-IV developmental dysplasia of the hip who underwent bilateral total hip arthroplasty and completed at least 2 years of follow-up were included. Group 1 comprised 10 patients (20 hips) who underwent anatomical hip center reconstruction, while group 2 comprised 10 patients (20 hips) who underwent high hip center reconstruction. The gait characteristics of patients were examined through markers placed in certain anatomical regions, the cameras placed around, and the force plates embedded in the walking platform. ResultsThere was no significant difference in the gait characteristics according to the location of the hip rotation center. The mean temporospatial, kinematic, and kinetic values were similar between the groups. The most prominent difference was in the peak dynamic hip extension, which was lower in group 2 (−9.71° ± 7.46°) compared to group 1 (−6.80° ± 11.44°), although it was not statistically significant (P = .09). ConclusionThe bilateral high hip center technique can provide similar gait characteristics as anatomical reconstruction and may be preferred in particularly difficult cases based on the surgeon’s decision.

Effects of Total Hip Arthroplasty on Axial Alignment of the Lower Limb in Patients with Unilateral Developmental Hip Dysplasia (Crowe type IV)

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of total hip arthroplasty on axial alignment of the lower limb in adults with unilateral developmental hip dysplasia (Crowe type IV). MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed medical records of 50 adults who underwent total hip arthroplasty, in which the acetabular cup was placed in the anatomical position. The following parameters were measured before surgery, immediately after surgery, and two years later: mechanical axis deviation (MAD), tibiofemoral angle (TFA), femoral offset, hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), mechanical medial proximal tibial angle, height of medial femoral condyle, height of lateral femoral condyle, and leg lengthening. Length of the resected femoral segment was also recorded from medical records. ResultsPreoperative MAD, TFA, HKA, and LDFA of the ipsilateral lower limb showed significant valgus deformity. MAD of the ipsilateral lower limb and valgus inclination were significantly smaller immediately after surgery than before, while TFA, HKA, femoral offset, and LDFA were significantly larger (P < 0.05). These parameters did not differ significantly between immediately after surgery and two years later (P > 0.05). Ipsilateral extremities were extended by a mean of 2.54 cm (range, 0 to 5.35 cm). The mean length of the femoral resected segment was 3.56 cm (range, 2.03 to 5.74 cm). The contralateral lower limb showed marginally smaller MAD and medial proximal tibial angle after surgery than before, but larger LDFA, TAF, and HKA. ConclusionsIn patients with developmental hip dysplasia who underwent total hip arthroplasty with placement of the acetabular component at the level of the anatomic hip center, axial alignment of the ipsilateral lower limb was immediately altered, and valgus inclination was significantly reduced. The procedure only slightly altered the axial alignment of the contralateral lower limb.

Failed periacetabular osteotomy leads to acetabular defects during subsequent total hip arthroplasty.

Acetabular wall defects after periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) lead to technical difficulties when performing subsequent total hip arthroplasty (THA). There is no unified consensus regarding the solution for THA socket installation after PAO. In the current study, we performed computed tomography (CT)-based simulation of socket installation and evaluated the acetabular defect following THA after PAO and after primary osteoarthritis (OA). The study group comprised 55 patients (56 hips) who underwent THA after PAO. For the control group, after matching for age, sex, and Crowe classification, we included 55 patients (56 hips) who underwent primary THA for hip dysplasia. We evaluated the anterior, posterior, and superior acetabular sector angle (ASA) and medial wall thickness (MWT) at the anatomical hip center (at the 20-mm vertical hip level from teardrop) in the study group (anatomical PAO group) and control group (primary OA group). In addition, we investigated the changes in the socket covering when the socket was positioned 10mm above the anatomical hip center (30mm above the teardrop; elevated osteotomy group). All ASA and MWT values were significantly smaller in the anatomical PAO group than in the primary OA group. In particular, the individuals with a Crowe classification of II/III in the anatomical PAO group presented severe acetabular defects. However, the elevated PAO group had a significantly larger ASA compared to the anatomical PAO group, with improved socket coverings. Acetabular defects in the anatomical hip center following THA after PAO were significantly common compared to those after primary THA. Elevation of hip joint centers as much as 10mm is one therapeutic option in the case of severe acetabular defects following THA after PAO.

High Hip Center Reduces the Dynamic Hip Range of Motion and Increases the Hip Load: A Gait Analysis Study in Hip Arthroplasty Patients With Unilateral Developmental Dysplasia

BackgroundLong-term favorable clinical outcomes of anatomical or high hip center techniques in total hip arthroplasty (THA) are reported in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). However, there is little information about the effect of the hip center location on gait characteristics. The purpose of this study was to compare these surgical techniques with gait analysis, analyze the effect of the hip rotation center location on gait parameters, and discuss the possible problems that may arise. MethodsA total of 40 patients who underwent THA due to unilateral coxarthrosis secondary to Crowe type III-IV DDH and completed 5 years of follow-up were included in the study. Group 1 included 20 patients who underwent anatomical hip center reconstruction, while group 2 included 20 patients who underwent high hip center reconstruction. Gait analysis was performed, and the groups were compared according to the gait characteristics. ResultsThe mean temporospatial values were similar between the groups. The extension of the operated side was significantly lower in group 2 (−9.11 ± 8.92) than in group 1 (−1.87 ± 11.51) (P = .04). The mean longitudinal hip joint force was found to be significantly higher in group 2 (8.92 N/kg ± 0.54) than in group 1 (8.16 N/kg ± 0.66) (P = .04). The high hip center technique has been shown to increase the load on the hip and restrict the dynamic range of motion. ConclusionThe high hip center technique can decrease the survival of the implant and increase the fall risk as it increases the load on the hip and reduces the dynamic range of motion. The hip center should be reconstructed anatomically when possible in DDH patients who undergo unilateral THA.

How does anteroposterior cup placement affect bone coverage and range of motion in primary total hip arthroplasty for hip dysplasia?

BackgroundDue to anterior bone defects, high and/or posterior placement of an acetabular cup is often required to achieve sufficient coverage in patients with hip dysplasia. We examined whether posterior cup placement affected the postoperative range of motion (ROM) in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). MethodsUsing computer software, bone coverage and ROM were examined in 32 patients with unilateral osteoarthritis of the hip with Crowe type II or III hip dysplasia. We determined the cup position to satisfy cup center-edge (Cup-CE) angle ≥0° and the required ROM. The cup was placed at the anatomic hip center and moved in 2-mm increments anteroposteriorly and 10-mm increments vertically. ResultsAt vertical anatomic hip center, less than 68.8% hips fulfilled Cup-CE ≥0° regardless of anteroposterior position. Significantly more hips at higher hip center with posterior cup placement achieved Cup-CE ≥0° than hips at vertical anatomic hip center, and 10 mm higher hip center was the most suitable for achieving bone coverage. However, posterior and superior cup placement significantly decreased the flexion and IR due to early bone impingement, whereas ER and extension were not affected. A smoothing spline curve demonstrated that more posterior cup placement than 4.8 mm and 3.6 mm did not satisfy the required ROM at 10 mm and 20 mm higher hip center, respectively. ConclusionsPosterosuperior cup placement gained more bone coverage but decreased the range of hip flexion and internal rotation. Consequently, posterosuperior cup placement did not satisfy the required ROM.

Long-term retrospective study on the placement of the cementless acetabular cup and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing femoral head autografting for hip dysplasia and total hip arthroplasty.

Placement of acetabular cup in the dysplastic hip is a challenging procedure. Using bulk femoral headautograft to increase the bony coverage of the cup is one of the techniques, which have been described. Theimpact of cup position on cup and autograft survival is a controversial issue. We aimed to determine whether the position of cementless acetabular cup used in conjunction with femoral head autograft in dysplastic hips affected the autograft-host incorporation with its final radiographic appearance and the cup survivorship into the second decade. Thirty-eight dysplastic hips with varying Crowe types in 31 patients (30 women and one man) were included. The mean age was 47 years (range, 29-64 years) and the mean follow-up was 20.3 years (range, 14.8-25.9 years). The initial postoperative and final radiographs were evaluated. The survival rate of the cups was analysed using Kaplan-Meier statistics and the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was used to evaluate the effect of variables (Crowe type, radiographic initial host bone coverage over the cup and position of the cup) on survivorship. The acetabular cups were positioned anatomical in 27/38 hips according to Ranawat measurement technique. Trabecular bridging at graft-host interface was seen in all cases at an average 22.1 months. Neither acetabular cup position nor initial host bone coverage over acetabular cup less than 50% had any significant effect on either cup survival or final radiographic appearance of the graft. The 20-year cup survival rate without aseptic revision was 66% (95 CI, 52%-84%). No revision was performed due to graft resorption. Twenty-year survival rate of the cementless cup combination with femoral head autograft showed no significant differences whether it was placed at high or anatomic hip centre. The final radiographic appearance of the autograft was not affected from either the cup location or the initial radiographic horizontal host bone coverage.

Inferomedial Hip Center Decreases Failure Rates in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty for Crowe II and III Hip Dysplasia

BackgroundWe sought to evaluate the outcomes of cementless acetabular components used in patients with Crowe II and III dysplasia, and to compare outcomes between cups placed within vs outside of an “anatomic” zone. Our specific aims were to (1) plot hip centers in these patients at our institution to characterize “anatomic” vs “nonanatomic” positions, (2) evaluate the association between hip center and radiographic loosening, (3) determine whether hip center was associated with acetabular component revision, and (4) compare patient-reported outcome scores between groups. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 88 primary cementless total hip arthroplasties at a mean follow-up of 10 years (range 2-26 years). Patients were 85% female, with a mean age of 44 years (range 28-61 years) and a body mass index of 27 kg/m2 (range 19-42 kg/m2). Medical records and radiographs were reviewed, and a survey was conducted for all patients. Anatomic hip center was defined using the 4-zone system, wherein centers are “anatomic” if they are <1 cm superior and <1 cm lateral to the approximate femoral head center. Cox proportional analyses were used to compare outcomes between groups. ResultsSeventy hips (80%) had an anatomic hip center. Anatomic hips had a lower incidence of radiographic acetabular loosening (0% vs 17%, P = .007) and cup revision (0% vs 28%, P = .0002). There were no differences in Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome and Joint Replacement Scores (96.2 ± 5 vs 91.9 ± 12, P = .7). ConclusionThe incidence of aseptic loosening and cup revision were lower when hip center was <1 cm superior and 1 cm lateral to the approximate femoral head center.

Subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy during cementless total hip arthroplasty in young patients with severe developmental dysplasia of the hip

BackgroundThis retrospective study was designed to determine complications, functional and radiographic results of transverse subtrochanteric osteotomy during cementless, modular total hip arthroplasty (THA) in a series of active patients younger than 45 years with Crowe Type-III or IV developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).MethodsWe followed 49 patients (56 hips) with DDH who were treated with cementless THA, where the acetabular cup was positioned in the anatomic hip center and where a simultaneous transverse femoral osteotomy was performed. Complication rate evaluation and clinical outcomes were measured by validated clinical scores and radiographic evaluation were performed at a mean follow up of 10 years (range, 4.8–14.3 years).ResultsThe mean limb-length discrepancy was reduced from 4.2 cm to 1.1 cm (P < 0.01). The mean Harris hip score (HSS) significantly improved from 40.6 points to 87.4 points (P < 0.01). Similarly, severity of low back pain, modified MAP, HOOS, and SF-12 also showed significant improvement (P < 0.01). There were 3 cases of postoperative dislocation, 3 cases of transient nerve palsy, 2 cases of nonunion, and 4 cases of intraoperative fracture. At 10 years follow-up, the estimated survival rate with any component revision as end points was 92%.ConclusionThe cementless THA combined with transverse subtrochanteric osteotomy is a reliable technique with restoration of a more normal limb, satisfactory clinical outcomes, and mid-term survival of components.