Anastomotic Leak Rate Research Articles

OGC SO45 - Effect of anastomotic technique on leak rates in two-stage robotic-assisted subtotal oesophagectomy

Abstract Background Introduction of new surgical techniques requires constant monitoring and real time audit. In our unit the introduction of the thoracic component of our robotic oesophagectomy program resulted in an increase in the anastomotic leak rate which was recognised in real time. This prompted a decision to change from a circular to a linear stapled technique. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of this change in technique on the anastomotic leak rate. Method A database was used to identify all cases of patients undergoing two stage subtotal oesophagectomy where the thoracic phase was performed robotically-assisted. Demographic, operative, pathological and complications data were extracted. An anastomotic leak was defined as radiological or endoscopic disruption of the oesophagogastric anastomosis or where a clinician had documented the presence of a leak in the clinical notes. Leaks were then graded by severity according to the classification by Low et al into type 1: localised defect treated with medical therapy or observation; Type 2: localised defect requiring intervention but not surgery, and; Type 3: localised defects requiring surgery. Results Fifty-seven patients were identified. The first 25 cases were reconstructed with a circular-stapled and the subsequent 32 with a linear-stapled anastomosis. There were no differences in baseline demographics. There were no differences in thoracic operating time nor blood loss, intraoperative complications and pathological variables such as lymph node yield. Overall, 11/57 patients (19%) had an anastomotic leak, of which 7 (28%) had a circular stapled anastomosis and 4 (12%) had a linear stapled anastomosis. This difference was not statistically significant (p=0.2384). However, CUSUM analysis after the change in anastomotic technique showed an ongoing and diminished anastomotic leak rate. Conclusion In our unit changing from a circular to a linear stapled anastomotic technique resulted in a reduction in the anastomotic leak rate from 24% to 12%. While this was not statistically significant, this is a clinically appreciable result and this benefit was confirmed on CUSUM analysis.

OGC SO46 - Improving outcomes after oesophagectomy: The benefits of full robotic-assisted minimally invasive oesophagectomy (RAMIO) demonstrated in the first 100 cases, at a high-volume UK unit

Abstract Background There is a rapid movement towards adoption of robotically assisted minimally invasive oesophagectomy (RAMIO) in the United Kingdom. Transition from an open or laparoscopic oesophagectomy to a RAMIO programme, which carries considerable financial and training cost, must ensure parity of oncological and perioperative outcomes. We sought to compare our centre’s results of the three standard approaches to two-phase oesophagectomy: Open/Open (Open); laparoscopic/robotic abdomen with open chest (Hybrid); and RAMIO. Method This prospective cohort study investigated the experience of five surgeons in a single high-volume UK institution. We analysed consecutive patients undergoing two-phase transthoracic oesophagectomy for oncological reasons between 2018 and 2024. The study period was divided into three cohorts: Open (2018-2020, n=61), Hybrid (2020-2023, n=82) and RAMIO (2023-2024, n=100). Patient demographics, tumour characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and oncological data were compared. Data were analysed using Kruskal-Wallis and Chi-squared statistical tests. Results No significant differences were observed in patient demographics or tumour stage between the groups. Comparison of Open vs. Hybrid vs. RAMIO demonstrated a significant reduction in major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥III), 34.4% vs. 23.2% vs. 14% (p=0.0014); pulmonary complications, 36.1% vs. 25.4% vs. 13% (p=0.0004); anastomotic leak rate, 11.5% vs. 2.4% vs. 4.0%, (p=0.0370); median length of stay, 14 vs. 12 vs. 8 days (p=0.0001); and mortality, 4.9% vs. 1.2% vs. 0% (p=0.0133) all favouring the RAMIO group in sub-group analysis. Median lymph node yields were comparable across groups, 49 vs. 43 vs. 43 (p=0.0876). Conclusion This single-institution study demonstrates potential benefits of transitioning from open or hybrid to RAMIO for oesophagectomy. RAMIO was associated with significantly reduced pulmonary complications, major complications and a shorter length of hospital stay. Oncological outcomes were maintained across all 3 techniques. These findings have important patient, financial, and resource implications, and support the continued adoption of RAMIO in the UK.

The Current State of Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (RAMIE): Outcomes from the Upper GI International Robotic Association (UGIRA) Esophageal Registry.

Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) is increasingly adopted in centers worldwide, with ongoing refinements to enhance results. This study aims to assess the current state of RAMIE worldwide and to identify potential areas for improvement. This descriptive study analyzed prospective data from esophageal cancer patients who underwent transthoracic RAMIE in Upper GI International Robotic Association (UGIRA) centers. Main endpoints included textbook outcome rate, surgical techniques, and perioperative outcomes. Analyses were performed separately for intrathoracic (Ivor-Lewis) and cervical anastomosis (McKeown), divided into three time cohorts (2016-2018, 2019-2020, 2021-2023). A sensitivity analysis was conducted with cases after the learning curve (> 70 cases). Across 28 UGIRA centers, 2012 Ivor-Lewis and 1180 McKeown procedures were performed. Over the time cohorts, textbook outcome rates were 39%, 48%, and 49% for Ivor-Lewis, and 49%, 63%, and 61% for McKeown procedures, respectively. Fully robotic procedures accounted for 66%, 51%, and 60% of Ivor-Lewis procedures, and 53%, 81%, and 66% of McKeown procedures. Lymph node yield showed 27, 30, and 30 nodes in Ivor-Lewis procedures, and 26, 26, and 34 nodes in McKeown procedures. Furthermore, high mediastinal lymphadenectomy was performed in 65%, 43%, and 37%, and 70%, 48%, and 64% of Ivor-Lewis and McKeown procedures, respectively. Anastomotic leakage rates were 22%, 22%, and 16% in Ivor-Lewis cases, and 14%, 12%, and 11% in McKeown cases. Hospital stay was 13, 14, and 13 days for Ivor-Lewis procedures, and 12, 9, and 11days for McKeown procedures. In Ivor-Lewis and McKeown, respectively, the sensitivity analysis revealed textbook outcome rates of 43%, 54%, and 51%, and 47%, 64%, and 64%; anastomotic leakage rates of 28%, 18%, and 15%, and 13%, 11%, and 10%; and hospital stay of 11, 12, and 12days, and 10, 9, and 9days. This study demonstrates favorable outcomes over time in achieving textbook outcome after RAMIE. Areas for improvement include a reduction of anastomotic leakage and shortening of hospital stay.

Evaluating the Impact of Elective Endotracheal Tube Replacement on Postoperative Outcomes in Esophageal Atresia: A STROBE-guided Study

ABSTRACT Background: Elective ventilation and paralysis have been shown to decrease the anastomosis-related complications following primary repair of esophageal atresia (EA). Repeated endotracheal tube (ETT) block and replacement can increase these complications. We evaluated the results of our strategy of electively changing the ETT just before shifting the patient to the postoperative ward for elective ventilation. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using the case records of patients from July 2015 to February 2024 including all the patients of EA with tracheoesophageal fistula who underwent primary repair with end-to-end esophageal anastomosis. The patients were divided into two groups Group A: ETT was changed and Group B: ETT was not changed immediately before shifting. The groups were compared for anastomotic leak and ETT tube block in the first 48 h. Results: Ninety-one patients were included in the study, 36 in Group A and 55 in Group B. Elective replacement of ETT decreased the tube block rates in the first 48 h following surgery (P = 0.032). Tension in the anastomosis was associated with a higher leak rate. The leak was present in 58.3% and 3.6% in cases with and without tension in the anastomosis (P = 0.001). Overall, the anastomotic leak was similar in both groups. In the subgroup of patients with anastomosis under tension, the rate of anastomotic leak was higher in patients with ETT block (P = 0.028). Conclusion: Elective replacement of EET decreases the tube block rates and anastomotic leak rates in cases with anastomosis under tension.

Comparing surgical outcomes of powered versus manual surgical staplers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The growing use of staplers, manual and powered, especially in minimally invasive surgeries, necessitates evaluating their efficacy in gastrointestinal and thoracic surgeries. Parameters analysed include anastomotic and air leakage rates, bleeding, infection, cost, and operative duration. We searched Cochrane Library, CINAHL, EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science using terms like "surgical staplers," "manual staplers," "automatic staplers," and "powered staplers." We assessed study quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal tools and conducted meta-analysis using Review Manager software. A total of 43,104 patients with a mean age of 60.8 were involved in the studies. The meta-analysis revealed a significant reduction in anastomotic leaks in GI surgery patients (OR 0.31, p = 0.0001) and a significant decrease in postoperative air leakage in thoracic surgery patients (OR 0.65, p = 0.05) when powered staplers were employed. Additionally, we observed a significant decline in hemostasis-related complications for both thoracic and GI surgeries (OR 0.48, p = 0.002) with the use of powered staplers. Although individually costlier than manual staplers, powered staplers significantly decreased total hospitalisation costs (MD -1725.82, p < 0.00001) amoungst the thoracic surgeries, due to the cost saved on remedying the lower rate of complications compared to manual staplers. It also decreased the average operative times in thoracic and GI surgeries, although not significant (p = 0.06, p = 0.07 respectively). Powered staplers surpass manual staplers by reducing operative duration, total hospital costs, and complications like anastomotic leaks and bleeding. Hence, they are poised to become the preferred alternative in future surgeries.

Minimally Invasive Transhiatal Esophagectomy Using Antegrade Inversion Technique in Esophageal Cancer: 10-Year Experience from a Tertiary Care Center.

Background: Esophageal cancer surgery aims for curative intent but carries high complication rates. Transthoracic esophagectomy is the dominant approach, however, transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) offers selective advantages in certain clinical scenarios. Minimally invasive THE (MI-THE) is an evolving technique with limited data. Methods: This retrospective study reviewed 38 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent MI-THE using "Antegrade Inversion Technique" between 2013 and 2023 at a tertiary care center. Perioperative outcomes were analyzed. Data were presented as mean with standard deviation, median with interquartile range, and percentages. Results: Most patients (86.8%) had early-stage cancer. Median operative time was 375 minutes, hospital stay was 8 days, and intensive care unit stay was 3 days. All patients achieved a negative resection margin. Pleural effusion (57.9%) was the most common complication, followed by pneumothorax (31.6%) and surgical site infection (15.8%). Anastomotic leak rate was 13.2%. There was no mortality. Conclusions: MI-THE appears safe and feasible with encouraging perioperative outcomes, particularly for early-stage disease and high-risk patients. While potentially offering advantages over open THE, further research is needed to definitively establish its role compared to traditional approaches.

Impact of Surgeon Specialization on Outcomes in Emergency Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Colorectal emergencies represent a large proportion of acute general surgical workload and carry significant mortality. Identify the influence of surgeon specialization on mortality and other outcomes in emergency colorectal surgery. Systematic searches of Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, and Cochrane electronic databases were performed for studies published from 1 January 1990 to 27 August 2023. Studies were included investigating outcomes in emergency colorectal surgery for adults, comparing colorectal against non-colorectal surgeon specialization. Exclusion criteria were: (1) publications studying primarily pediatric populations; (2) studies incorporating patients who had undergone surgery prior to 1990; (3) studies only published in abstract form or non-English language. Primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were rates of anastomotic leak, reintervention, primary anastomosis, and laparoscopic approach. Of 7676 studies identified, 155 were selected for full-text review and 21 studies were included for quantitative analysis. Eleven studies showed improved 30-day (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.60-0.68, p < 0.0001) and in hospital mortality (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.49-0.89, p = 0.007) with colorectal specialization. There was a significantly higher rate of primary anastomosis (OR 2.95, 95% CI 2.02-4.31, p < 0.0001) and use of laparoscopic surgery (OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.42-4.00, p = 0.001) amongst specialized colorectal surgeons. Specialization was also associated with a significant reduction in any stoma formation (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.28-0.98, p = 0.04). No significant difference was observed for anastomotic leak (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.45-1.07, p = 0.10) or reintervention rates (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.55-1.10, p = 0.16). Heterogeneity exists within the included patient populations and definitions of colorectal specialization observed in different countries. Emergency colorectal surgery undertaken by specialized colorectal surgeons is associated with significantly improved post-operative mortality, lower rates of stoma formation and increased rates of primary anastomosis and minimally invasive surgery. CRD42022300541.

Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Angiography (ICG-FA) in the management of intestinal injuries following penetrating abdominal trauma: a case-control study comparing postoperative outcomes.

The surgical management of penetrating hollow visceral injuries includes primary repair or exteriorization. Tissue perfusion at the site of gastrointestinal suture repair may be challenging to assess and is vulnerable to local energy transfer-related injury, micro- or macro-circulatory insufficiency, or splanchnic vasoconstriction for various reasons. Breakdown of suture lines can lead to potentially life-threatening complications. The intraoperative use of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Angiography (ICG-FA) may reduce the risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality by ensuring optimal tissue perfusion at the chosen site of suture repair. We conducted a retrospective review of the postoperative complications, length of Intensive Care (ICU) stay, and length of hospital stay in patients undergoing laparotomy, with and without ICG-FA for penetrating abdominal trauma at a Level One Trauma Center in Cape Town, South Africa. One hundred patients were included in the study, of which 20 underwent laparotomy with ICG-FA, and 80 did not. The overall complication rate was significantly lower in the ICG-FA group (OR 0.336, p-value=0.0412). The anastomotic leak rates in the ICG-FA and control groups were 0% and 6.25%, respectively (p-value=0.5799). Revision surgery was required in 2 and 14 patients in the ICG-FA and control groups, respectively (OR 0.524, p-value=0.516). The mean length of stay in hospital showed no statistical difference, 8.6 and 5.3 days for the ICG-FA and control groups, respectively (p-value=0.092). The mean length of ICU stay was 6.3 and 2.3 days for the ICG-FA and control groups, respectively (p-value=0.1642). Lower levels of overall postoperative complications and lower rates of revision surgery in patients undergoing laparotomy with ICG-FA are promising. Non-significant findings regarding the relationship between the usage of ICG-FA and anastomotic leak rates suggest the need for larger randomized studies.

Outcomes of mediastinal envelope closure during minimally invasive esophagectomy

BackgroundLimited outcomes data exists regarding whether mediastinal envelope closure during minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is related to outcomes including anastomotic leak and postoperative pyloric dilation. We hypothesized that mediastinal envelope closure would be associated with fewer adverse outcomes. MethodsPatients undergoing MIE between 9/1/2017 and 11/15/2021 were studied. Patients were divided into two groups, complete envelope closure (CC) or partially closed/ not closed (NC), and baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate variables associated with a composite outcome of anastomotic leak and/or pyloric dilation. ResultsWe identified 181 patients. Age, sex, race/ethnicity, BMI, smoking history, CCI, ECOG status, operative duration, cancer stage/histology, intraoperative fluids, EBL, and EEA size were not statistically different between the CC and NC groups, though use of indocyanine green-enhanced fluorescence evaluation (ICG) was significantly different (24.5 % versus 67.6 %, p <0.001). The CC group experienced lower rates of anastomotic leak (2 % vs 14.7 %, p = 0.007), postoperative pyloric dilation (15.6 % vs 32.4 %, p = 0.025), and delayed gastric emptying (6.1 % vs 20.6 %, p = 0.015). Risk factors for a composite outcome defined as anastomotic leak and/or pyloric dilation were evaluated using a multivariable logistic regression, and NC was an independent predictor of this composite outcome (aOR 3.74, p = 0.007). ConclusionsComplete mediastinal envelope closure is associated with decreased rates of anastomotic leak, postoperative pyloric dilation, and delayed gastric emptying. Further prospective trials involving mediastinal envelope closure are warranted to elucidate its positive effect on postoperative outcomes.

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: The Largest Systematic Reviews of 68,755 Patients and Meta-analysis.

This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of robotic gastrectomy (RG) and laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) in treating gastric cancer (GC). A comprehensive literature search across PubMed, MEDLINE, and Web of Science identified 86 eligible studies, including 68,755 patients (20,894 in the RG group and 47,861 in the LG group). The analysis revealed that RG was associated with superior outcomes in several areas: more lymph nodes were harvested, intraoperative blood loss was reduced, postoperative hospital stays were shorter, and the time to first flatus and oral intake was shortened (all p<0.001). Additionally, RG resulted in lower incidences of conversion to open surgery (OR=0.62, p=0.004), reoperation (OR=0.68, p=0.010), overall postoperative complications (OR=0.82, p<0.001), severe complications (OR=0.65, p<0.001), and pancreatic complications (OR=0.60, p=0.004). However, RG had longer operative times and higher costs (both p<0.001). No significant differences were found between RG and LG in terms of resection margin distance, mortality, anastomotic leakage, or recurrence rates. RG is a safe and effective surgical option for patients of GC, but further improvements in operative duration and costs are needed.

Efficacy of lymph node dissection around the inferior mesenteric artery with preservation of the left colic artery for rectal cancer

AbstractObjectiveWe investigated how Japanese D3 dissection with left colic artery (LCA) preservation affects anastomotic leakage after anterior resection with anastomosis for rectal cancer, based on the leak rate. The correlation between LCA preservation, survival, and cancer recurrence after resection was also analyzed.Summary and Background DataIt remains unclear how LCA preservation affects the anastomotic leak rate and oncological outcomes after resection remains unclear. Some reports suggested that anastomotic leakage increases local recurrence and decreases cancer‐specific survival.MethodsIn this study, we enrolled and analyzed 457 patients who underwent radical resection of rectal cancer in the period October 2011 through December 2016. The attending surgeon decided preoperatively and registered whether to preserve the LCA. This trial was registered under the UMIN‐CTR Identifier UMIN000006160.ResultsD3 with LCA preservation was successfully completed in 218 (89.3%) of the 244 patients registered in this group, whereas D3 without LCA preservation was successfully completed in all 213 patients registered in this group. After propensity score matching, the anastomotic leakage rate was 7.86% (11/140) after D3 with LCA preservation and 7.14% (10/140) after D3 without LCA preservation. The overall survival rates were 90.1% and 89.3%, and the recurrence‐free survival rates were 77.6% and 77.3%, respectively.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that LCA preservation has no effect on the incidence of anastomotic leakage after rectal resection with anastomosis using DST and that oncological outcomes may not be affected.

Efficacy of endoscopic vacuum therapy in esophageal luminal defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure (EVAC) is a novel technique used to repair esophageal perforation and leaks. Varying data have been reported on the overall success rate of EVAC. We aimed to conduct a metanalysis of the available data on the clinical success rate of EVAC. Electronic databases were searched for publications addressing the efficacy of EVAC in esophageal luminal defects. Pooling was conducted using both fixed and random-effects models. The overall clinical success of EVAC therapy was considered the primary outcome, whereas, overall complication rates, need for adjunct therapy, and mortality were considered secondary outcomes. In total, 366 patients were included in the study. On pooled analysis, the mean age was 66 years with 68.32% of patients being men. Overall pooled clinical success rate of EVAC therapy was 87.95%. Upon subgroup analysis, the pooled clinical success rate of postsurgical anastomotic leak and transmural esophageal perforation were found to be 86.57% and 88.89%, respectively. The all-cause hospital mortality was 14% and 4.2% in patients with esophageal perforation and EVAC, respectively. This study demonstrates that EVAC therapy has a high overall clinical success rate, with low mortality. EVAC therapy seems to be a promising procedure with excellent outcomes in patients with luminal esophageal defects.

Minimally invasive vs open vs hybrid esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) for esophageal carcinoma has emerged as the contemporary alternative to conventional laparoscopic minimally invasive (LMIE), hybrid (HE) and open (OE) surgical approaches. No single study has compared all four approaches with a view to postoperative outcomes. A systematic search of electronic databases was undertaken. A network meta-analysis was performed as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-network meta-analysis guidelines. Statistical analysis was performed using R and Shiny. Seven randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with 1063 patients were included. Overall, 32.9% of patients underwent OE (350/1063), 11.0% underwent HE (117/1063), 34.0% of patients underwent LMIE (361/1063), and 22.1% of patients underwent RAMIE (235/1063). OE had the lowest anastomotic leak rate 7.7% (27/350), while LMIE had the lowest pulmonary 10.8% (39/361), cardiac 0.56% (1/177) complications, re-intervention rates 5.08% (12/236), 90-day mortality 1.05% (2/191), and shortest length of hospital stay (mean 11.25days). RAMIE displayed the lowest 30-day mortality rate at 0.80% (2/250). There was a significant increase in pulmonary complications for those undergoing OE (OR 3.63 [95% confidence interval: 1.4-9.77]) when compared to RAMIE. LMIE is a safe and feasible option for esophagectomy when compared to OE and HE. The upcoming RCTs will provide further data to make a more robust interrogation of the surgical outcomes following RAMIE compared to conventional open surgery to determine equipoise or superiority of each approach as the era of minimally invasive esophagectomy continues to evolve (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews Registration: CRD42023438790).

A Comprehensive Review of the Literature: Does an Optimal Type of Anastomosis Exist for One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass?

One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is a popular bariatric procedure known for its efficacy in promoting weight loss and improving metabolic outcomes. However, the optimal anastomotic technique for OAGB remains a subject of debate. This literature review comprehensively examines the three primary anastomotic techniques - linear stapled, circular stapled, and hand-sewn - to determine their suitability for OAGB. Linear stapled anastomosis is favored for its shorter operative time and lower complication rates, such as a reduced incidence of gastrojejunal stenosis. However, its larger anastomotic diameter increases the risk of marginal ulcers due to greater exposure of the gastric mucosa to bile and gastric acids. Circular stapled anastomosis offers a uniform and consistent lumen, which may reduce the risk of postoperative stenosis but is associated with a higher incidence of strictures and ulcers, making it less ideal for use in OAGB. Hand-sewn anastomosis, while time-intensive, provides superior control over anastomotic size and tension, resulting in the lowest rates of strictures and anastomotic leaks, although its effectiveness is highly dependent on surgical expertise. Overall, the current literature lacks large-scale, multicenter studies directly comparing these techniques in the context of OAGB. Future research should focus on randomized controlled trials to establish the most effective and safe anastomotic method for this procedure. Understanding the nuanced benefits and drawbacks of each technique is crucial for optimizing clinical outcomes in OAGB.

Tubeless ureteroenteric anastomosis in robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion does not increase the risk of anastomotic stenosis or postoperative complications.

The objective is to demonstrate that omitting ureteral stent placement in robotic intracorporeal urinary diversion does not lead to increased risk of perioperative complications, namely ureteral strictures or anastomotic leaks. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 68 consecutive patients who underwent robotic radical cystectomy with ileal conduit creation or orthotopic neobladder by a single surgeon between January 2020 and September 2023. Chronologically, the first cohort of patients had ureteral stents placed to bridge the ureteroenteric anastomosis, and in the second cohort, stenting was omitted. Cohort 1 consisted of 28 patients with surgeries performed between January 2020 and April 2021, while cohort 2 had 40 patients who underwent surgery from April 2021 to September 2023. The cohorts were well matched with regard to patient age, gender, ASA score and rate of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The choice of urinary diversion was left to surgeon and patient preference, and there was no significant difference in the proportion of ileal conduits versus orthotopic neobladders within each cohort. Estimated blood loss, total operative time, inpatient length of stay and pathologic T and N staging did not statistically differ between the cohorts. Overall, there was no difference in the rates of postoperative ileus, ureteral stricture, anastomotic leak, infectious complications, and 30-day readmission rates between the groups. Tubeless ureteroenteric anastomosis in patients undergoing robotic radical cystectomy with intracorporeal diversion does not appear to increase the risk of anastomotic strictures or postoperative complications. Further prospective evaluation is warranted.

Impact of diverting ileostomy on functional outcome and quality of life after restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch anal anastomosis.

Diverting ileostomy (DS) after restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) can be omitted in selected patients. Its omission could improve functional outcomes and quality of life (QoL), as has been demonstrated in patients after proctectomy. The aim of this study was to report the impact of diverting ileostomy on functional outcomes and QoL after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). This was a retrospective study including all patients operated (2015-2020) for RPC with IPAA. Functional outcome was evaluated by validated scores (LARS, Wexner, Öresland, pouch functional score [PFS] and the ileoanal pouch syndrome severity [IPSS] score). Global health-related QoL was evaluated with the SF-36. We also analysed demographic characteristics, morbidity, correlation between functional outcomes and QoL. Among 179 eligible patients, 150 responded (84%): S- (no stoma = 78; 52%) and S+ (had stoma = 72; 48%). Overall morbidity and anastomotic leak rates were 46% and 9.3%, respectively without difference between the groups. Medians for the functional scores were comparable between the S- and S+ group, respectively: 18 [12.5-31] versus 18 [11-31], p = 0.48 for LARS; 9 [7-11] versus 9 [7-12], p = 0.23 for Wexner's score; 6 [3-13] versus 8 [5-11], p = 0.22 for Öresland's score, 6 [3-13] versus 6.8 [4-12], p = 0.174 for PFS score, and 40 [35-45] versus 46 [42-51], p = 0.045 for IPSS score. The SF-36 summary score was comparable between the two groups without any difference in eight specific health dimensions. After propensity score matching, results were still comparable between the two groups for all scores. Linear regression found a significant correlation between all QoL domains and all functional scores (p < 0.001). DS for IPAA does not alter either functional outcomes or QoL and can be omitted in selected patients.

Mediastinal drainage combined with upper mediastinal re-tunneling vs. mediastinal drainage alone in McKeown esophagectomy of esophageal cancer: a retrospective study.

Although mediastinal drainage may lower the risk of anastomotic leakage, the incident rate of anastomotic leakage is still high. The current study aimed to compare the effects of mediastinal drainage combined with upper mediastinal re-tunneling with mediastinal drainage only on anastomotic leakage after McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. From October 2018 to March 2021, 52 patients diagnosed as esophageal carcinoma were included in the study. 21 patients received mediastinal drainage combined with upper mediastinal re-tunneling (re-tunneling group) and 31 received mediastinal drainage only (standard group) after McKeown esophagectomy. The incidence rate of anastomotic leakage, mediastinal infection, chylothorax, thoracic infection, the peak value of leukocyte count and the mortality related to anastomotic leakage were compared between the two groups. One (4.8%) patient in the re-tunneling group developed anastomotic leakage, and no patient experienced mediastinal infection or thoracic infection. Four (12.9%) patients in the standard group developed anastomotic leakage, and all these patients experienced mediastinal infection and thoracic infection (p < 0.05). The drainage volumes of patients in the re-tunneling group and the standard group were (170 ± 60) ml and (155 ± 45) ml, respectively, with no significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). The peak values of leukocyte count and temperature in the re-tunneling group were (14.28 ± 1.12) × 109/L and (38.6 ± 1.1) °C, both lower than that of the standard group[ (16.48 ± 1.15) × 109/L and (38.9 ± 1.2) °C, respectively]. But the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). No anastomotic leakage related death occurred in both groups. Mediastinal drainage combined with upper mediastinal re-tunneling after McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer may decrease the risk of anastomotic leakage, mediastinal and thoracic infection, reduce the inflammatory response of patients, but did not increase the mortality related to anastomotic leakage. The study was retrospectively registered.

Comparative Analysis of Surgical Outcomes in Hybrid and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Regional Russian Cancer Centre Experience.

Surgery is pivotal in treating esophageal cancer; hybrid esophagectomy, which combines minimally invasive and open techniques, shows promising outcomes. This historical cohort study compared the surgical outcomes of standard open esophagectomy with hybrid esophagectomy. Overall, 58 patients who underwent either hybrid or open esophagectomy at the Ulyanovsk Regional Clinical Oncology Clinic, Russia, from January 2015 to December 2023 were included. Data on demographics, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. The primary measures were overall complications and anastomotic leakage rates. Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson's Chi square test and t test via StatTech software (version 2.8.8). The number of removed lymph nodes was higher in the hybrid group (24±9) than in the open group (15±7) (P<0.001). In addition, the hybrid esophagectomy group showed significant reductions in operational time and blood loss (P<0.001 and P=0.014, respectively). The need for blood transfusion was higher in the open esophagectomy group (P=0.043). The postoperative length of stay in the hospital did not differ significantly between the two groups (open=20±8 days, hybrid=17±7 days, P=0.178). Cardiac complications were more frequent after an open esophagectomy (P=0.044). Hybrid esophagectomy reduced postoperative cardiac complications and other adverse events while maintaining satisfactory oncological outcomes. It had advantages over standard open esophagectomy in terms of lymphadenectomy, operative time, blood loss, and transfusion requirements, suggesting its efficacy for esophageal cancer patients.

Analyzing the Role of Mechanical Bowel Preparation on Surgical Outcomes in Colorectal Surgery

Despite improved postoperative recovery from the use of minimally invasive procedures and enhanced recovery after surgery protocols in recent decades, colectomy is still associated with morbidity. Surgical site infections range from trivial wound infections to potentially deadly colonic anastomotic leaks. Objectives: To compare the outcome results regarding postoperative complications of Mechanical Bowel Preparation and Non-Medical Bowel Preparation groups in elective colorectal surgery at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Peshawar, Pakistan. Methods: The research was a quasi-experimental study. In this study, 210 patients were included; they were divided into 2 groups: Mechanical Bowel Preparation Group and the Non-Mechanical Bowel Preparation Group. Data were collected through electronic health records. The data were analysed using SPSS software version 26.0. Descriptive statistics, such as the Chi-Square test, were applied to the results. Results: There was no statistically significant difference regarding the surgical outcomes and the demographics between the Mechanical Bowel Preparation and Mechanical Bowel Preparation groups. The escalation of the surgical site infection looked lower when the Mechanical Bowel Preparation was not in use i.e 20 (19.05%) in the Mechanical Bowel Preparation group and 14 (13.33%) in the Non-Mechanical Bowel Preparation group, but it did not seem to be, statistically significant; p-value=0.261014. The anastomotic leak rates and intra-abdominal collection rates do not differ significantly between the two groups; p&gt;0.05. Conclusions: It was concluded that there was no statistical significance between the groups of mechanical bowel preparation and non-mechanical bowel preparation concerning surgical site infections, anastomotic leakages, and other colorectal surgery complications.

Clinical features, surgical treatment strategy, and feasibility of minimally invasive surgery for synchronous and metachronous multiple colorectal cancers: A 14-year single-center experience.

Patients with a history of colorectal cancer (CRC) are at increased risk of developing secondary synchronous/metachronous CRCs. The role of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for multiple CRCs remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the short-term outcomes of MIS in patients with multiple CRCs and elucidate their clinical characteristics. This retrospective study reviewed CRC patients who underwent MIS between 2010 and 2023. Multiple CRC cases were categorized into synchronous and metachronous cohorts. Demographics, pathological findings, and perioperative outcomes were analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed as appropriate. A total of 1,272 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 99 (7.8%) having multiple CRCs (75 synchronous and 24 metachronous). Multiple CRC patients had a higher prevalence of strong family history (8.1% vs. 1.0%, P < 0.001) and right-sided colon cancer (55.6% vs. 34.4%, P < 0.001) compared to solitary CRC patients. MSI-high/MMR-deficient status, including Lynch syndrome, was frequently observed among patients with multiple CRCs. Synchronous CRCs requiring double-anastomosis were associated with longer operation times (P = 0.03) and increased blood loss (P = 0.03) compared to those with a single-anastomosis. In the metachronous cohort, repeat operation patterns were categorized based on tumor location and sacrificed arteries. Preservation of the left-colic artery avoided extended colectomy in some patients. Patients with multiple CRC involving rectal cancer had a higher anastomotic leakage (AL) rate (17.6% vs. 5.7%, P < 0.01); however, this difference in AL rate disappeared after PSM (8.8% vs. 8.8%, P = 1.0). In patients with multiple CRCs, AL has not been observed ever since the indocyanine green fluorescence imaging was implemented. MIS is feasible for multiple CRCs, with perioperative outcomes comparable to those for solitary CRCs. Preservation of critical arteries may benefit patients at high risk of secondary CRCs, particularly those with a strong family history of CRC, right-sided tumors, or MSI-high/MMR-deficient profiles, including Lynch syndrome.