Anastomotic Leak Rate Research Articles

Minimally Invasive Transhiatal Esophagectomy Using Antegrade Inversion Technique in Esophageal Cancer: 10-Year Experience from a Tertiary Care Center.

Background: Esophageal cancer surgery aims for curative intent but carries high complication rates. Transthoracic esophagectomy is the dominant approach, however, transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) offers selective advantages in certain clinical scenarios. Minimally invasive THE (MI-THE) is an evolving technique with limited data. Methods: This retrospective study reviewed 38 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent MI-THE using "Antegrade Inversion Technique" between 2013 and 2023 at a tertiary care center. Perioperative outcomes were analyzed. Data were presented as mean with standard deviation, median with interquartile range, and percentages. Results: Most patients (86.8%) had early-stage cancer. Median operative time was 375 minutes, hospital stay was 8 days, and intensive care unit stay was 3 days. All patients achieved a negative resection margin. Pleural effusion (57.9%) was the most common complication, followed by pneumothorax (31.6%) and surgical site infection (15.8%). Anastomotic leak rate was 13.2%. There was no mortality. Conclusions: MI-THE appears safe and feasible with encouraging perioperative outcomes, particularly for early-stage disease and high-risk patients. While potentially offering advantages over open THE, further research is needed to definitively establish its role compared to traditional approaches.

Impact of Surgeon Specialization on Outcomes in Emergency Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Colorectal emergencies represent a large proportion of acute general surgical workload and carry significant mortality. Identify the influence of surgeon specialization on mortality and other outcomes in emergency colorectal surgery. Systematic searches of Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, and Cochrane electronic databases were performed for studies published from 1 January 1990 to 27 August 2023. Studies were included investigating outcomes in emergency colorectal surgery for adults, comparing colorectal against non-colorectal surgeon specialization. Exclusion criteria were: (1) publications studying primarily pediatric populations; (2) studies incorporating patients who had undergone surgery prior to 1990; (3) studies only published in abstract form or non-English language. Primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were rates of anastomotic leak, reintervention, primary anastomosis, and laparoscopic approach. Of 7676 studies identified, 155 were selected for full-text review and 21 studies were included for quantitative analysis. Eleven studies showed improved 30-day (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.60-0.68, p < 0.0001) and in hospital mortality (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.49-0.89, p = 0.007) with colorectal specialization. There was a significantly higher rate of primary anastomosis (OR 2.95, 95% CI 2.02-4.31, p < 0.0001) and use of laparoscopic surgery (OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.42-4.00, p = 0.001) amongst specialized colorectal surgeons. Specialization was also associated with a significant reduction in any stoma formation (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.28-0.98, p = 0.04). No significant difference was observed for anastomotic leak (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.45-1.07, p = 0.10) or reintervention rates (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.55-1.10, p = 0.16). Heterogeneity exists within the included patient populations and definitions of colorectal specialization observed in different countries. Emergency colorectal surgery undertaken by specialized colorectal surgeons is associated with significantly improved post-operative mortality, lower rates of stoma formation and increased rates of primary anastomosis and minimally invasive surgery. CRD42022300541.

Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Angiography (ICG-FA) in the management of intestinal injuries following penetrating abdominal trauma: a case-control study comparing postoperative outcomes.

The surgical management of penetrating hollow visceral injuries includes primary repair or exteriorization. Tissue perfusion at the site of gastrointestinal suture repair may be challenging to assess and is vulnerable to local energy transfer-related injury, micro- or macro-circulatory insufficiency, or splanchnic vasoconstriction for various reasons. Breakdown of suture lines can lead to potentially life-threatening complications. The intraoperative use of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Angiography (ICG-FA) may reduce the risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality by ensuring optimal tissue perfusion at the chosen site of suture repair. We conducted a retrospective review of the postoperative complications, length of Intensive Care (ICU) stay, and length of hospital stay in patients undergoing laparotomy, with and without ICG-FA for penetrating abdominal trauma at a Level One Trauma Center in Cape Town, South Africa. One hundred patients were included in the study, of which 20 underwent laparotomy with ICG-FA, and 80 did not. The overall complication rate was significantly lower in the ICG-FA group (OR 0.336, p-value=0.0412). The anastomotic leak rates in the ICG-FA and control groups were 0% and 6.25%, respectively (p-value=0.5799). Revision surgery was required in 2 and 14 patients in the ICG-FA and control groups, respectively (OR 0.524, p-value=0.516). The mean length of stay in hospital showed no statistical difference, 8.6 and 5.3 days for the ICG-FA and control groups, respectively (p-value=0.092). The mean length of ICU stay was 6.3 and 2.3 days for the ICG-FA and control groups, respectively (p-value=0.1642). Lower levels of overall postoperative complications and lower rates of revision surgery in patients undergoing laparotomy with ICG-FA are promising. Non-significant findings regarding the relationship between the usage of ICG-FA and anastomotic leak rates suggest the need for larger randomized studies.

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: The Largest Systematic Reviews of 68,755 Patients and Meta-analysis.

This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of robotic gastrectomy (RG) and laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) in treating gastric cancer (GC). A comprehensive literature search across PubMed, MEDLINE, and Web of Science identified 86 eligible studies, including 68,755 patients (20,894 in the RG group and 47,861 in the LG group). The analysis revealed that RG was associated with superior outcomes in several areas: more lymph nodes were harvested, intraoperative blood loss was reduced, postoperative hospital stays were shorter, and the time to first flatus and oral intake was shortened (all p<0.001). Additionally, RG resulted in lower incidences of conversion to open surgery (OR=0.62, p=0.004), reoperation (OR=0.68, p=0.010), overall postoperative complications (OR=0.82, p<0.001), severe complications (OR=0.65, p<0.001), and pancreatic complications (OR=0.60, p=0.004). However, RG had longer operative times and higher costs (both p<0.001). No significant differences were found between RG and LG in terms of resection margin distance, mortality, anastomotic leakage, or recurrence rates. RG is a safe and effective surgical option for patients of GC, but further improvements in operative duration and costs are needed.

Efficacy of lymph node dissection around the inferior mesenteric artery with preservation of the left colic artery for rectal cancer

AbstractObjectiveWe investigated how Japanese D3 dissection with left colic artery (LCA) preservation affects anastomotic leakage after anterior resection with anastomosis for rectal cancer, based on the leak rate. The correlation between LCA preservation, survival, and cancer recurrence after resection was also analyzed.Summary and Background DataIt remains unclear how LCA preservation affects the anastomotic leak rate and oncological outcomes after resection remains unclear. Some reports suggested that anastomotic leakage increases local recurrence and decreases cancer‐specific survival.MethodsIn this study, we enrolled and analyzed 457 patients who underwent radical resection of rectal cancer in the period October 2011 through December 2016. The attending surgeon decided preoperatively and registered whether to preserve the LCA. This trial was registered under the UMIN‐CTR Identifier UMIN000006160.ResultsD3 with LCA preservation was successfully completed in 218 (89.3%) of the 244 patients registered in this group, whereas D3 without LCA preservation was successfully completed in all 213 patients registered in this group. After propensity score matching, the anastomotic leakage rate was 7.86% (11/140) after D3 with LCA preservation and 7.14% (10/140) after D3 without LCA preservation. The overall survival rates were 90.1% and 89.3%, and the recurrence‐free survival rates were 77.6% and 77.3%, respectively.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that LCA preservation has no effect on the incidence of anastomotic leakage after rectal resection with anastomosis using DST and that oncological outcomes may not be affected.

Efficacy of endoscopic vacuum therapy in esophageal luminal defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure (EVAC) is a novel technique used to repair esophageal perforation and leaks. Varying data have been reported on the overall success rate of EVAC. We aimed to conduct a metanalysis of the available data on the clinical success rate of EVAC. Electronic databases were searched for publications addressing the efficacy of EVAC in esophageal luminal defects. Pooling was conducted using both fixed and random-effects models. The overall clinical success of EVAC therapy was considered the primary outcome, whereas, overall complication rates, need for adjunct therapy, and mortality were considered secondary outcomes. In total, 366 patients were included in the study. On pooled analysis, the mean age was 66 years with 68.32% of patients being men. Overall pooled clinical success rate of EVAC therapy was 87.95%. Upon subgroup analysis, the pooled clinical success rate of postsurgical anastomotic leak and transmural esophageal perforation were found to be 86.57% and 88.89%, respectively. The all-cause hospital mortality was 14% and 4.2% in patients with esophageal perforation and EVAC, respectively. This study demonstrates that EVAC therapy has a high overall clinical success rate, with low mortality. EVAC therapy seems to be a promising procedure with excellent outcomes in patients with luminal esophageal defects.

Minimally invasive vs open vs hybrid esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) for esophageal carcinoma has emerged as the contemporary alternative to conventional laparoscopic minimally invasive (LMIE), hybrid (HE) and open (OE) surgical approaches. No single study has compared all four approaches with a view to postoperative outcomes. A systematic search of electronic databases was undertaken. A network meta-analysis was performed as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-network meta-analysis guidelines. Statistical analysis was performed using R and Shiny. Seven randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with 1063 patients were included. Overall, 32.9% of patients underwent OE (350/1063), 11.0% underwent HE (117/1063), 34.0% of patients underwent LMIE (361/1063), and 22.1% of patients underwent RAMIE (235/1063). OE had the lowest anastomotic leak rate 7.7% (27/350), while LMIE had the lowest pulmonary 10.8% (39/361), cardiac 0.56% (1/177) complications, re-intervention rates 5.08% (12/236), 90-day mortality 1.05% (2/191), and shortest length of hospital stay (mean 11.25days). RAMIE displayed the lowest 30-day mortality rate at 0.80% (2/250). There was a significant increase in pulmonary complications for those undergoing OE (OR 3.63 [95% confidence interval: 1.4-9.77]) when compared to RAMIE. LMIE is a safe and feasible option for esophagectomy when compared to OE and HE. The upcoming RCTs will provide further data to make a more robust interrogation of the surgical outcomes following RAMIE compared to conventional open surgery to determine equipoise or superiority of each approach as the era of minimally invasive esophagectomy continues to evolve (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews Registration: CRD42023438790).

Tubeless ureteroenteric anastomosis in robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion does not increase the risk of anastomotic stenosis or postoperative complications.

The objective is to demonstrate that omitting ureteral stent placement in robotic intracorporeal urinary diversion does not lead to increased risk of perioperative complications, namely ureteral strictures or anastomotic leaks. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 68 consecutive patients who underwent robotic radical cystectomy with ileal conduit creation or orthotopic neobladder by a single surgeon between January 2020 and September 2023. Chronologically, the first cohort of patients had ureteral stents placed to bridge the ureteroenteric anastomosis, and in the second cohort, stenting was omitted. Cohort 1 consisted of 28 patients with surgeries performed between January 2020 and April 2021, while cohort 2 had 40 patients who underwent surgery from April 2021 to September 2023. The cohorts were well matched with regard to patient age, gender, ASA score and rate of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The choice of urinary diversion was left to surgeon and patient preference, and there was no significant difference in the proportion of ileal conduits versus orthotopic neobladders within each cohort. Estimated blood loss, total operative time, inpatient length of stay and pathologic T and N staging did not statistically differ between the cohorts. Overall, there was no difference in the rates of postoperative ileus, ureteral stricture, anastomotic leak, infectious complications, and 30-day readmission rates between the groups. Tubeless ureteroenteric anastomosis in patients undergoing robotic radical cystectomy with intracorporeal diversion does not appear to increase the risk of anastomotic strictures or postoperative complications. Further prospective evaluation is warranted.

Impact of diverting ileostomy on functional outcome and quality of life after restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch anal anastomosis.

Diverting ileostomy (DS) after restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) can be omitted in selected patients. Its omission could improve functional outcomes and quality of life (QoL), as has been demonstrated in patients after proctectomy. The aim of this study was to report the impact of diverting ileostomy on functional outcomes and QoL after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). This was a retrospective study including all patients operated (2015-2020) for RPC with IPAA. Functional outcome was evaluated by validated scores (LARS, Wexner, Öresland, pouch functional score [PFS] and the ileoanal pouch syndrome severity [IPSS] score). Global health-related QoL was evaluated with the SF-36. We also analysed demographic characteristics, morbidity, correlation between functional outcomes and QoL. Among 179 eligible patients, 150 responded (84%): S- (no stoma = 78; 52%) and S+ (had stoma = 72; 48%). Overall morbidity and anastomotic leak rates were 46% and 9.3%, respectively without difference between the groups. Medians for the functional scores were comparable between the S- and S+ group, respectively: 18 [12.5-31] versus 18 [11-31], p = 0.48 for LARS; 9 [7-11] versus 9 [7-12], p = 0.23 for Wexner's score; 6 [3-13] versus 8 [5-11], p = 0.22 for Öresland's score, 6 [3-13] versus 6.8 [4-12], p = 0.174 for PFS score, and 40 [35-45] versus 46 [42-51], p = 0.045 for IPSS score. The SF-36 summary score was comparable between the two groups without any difference in eight specific health dimensions. After propensity score matching, results were still comparable between the two groups for all scores. Linear regression found a significant correlation between all QoL domains and all functional scores (p < 0.001). DS for IPAA does not alter either functional outcomes or QoL and can be omitted in selected patients.

Mediastinal drainage combined with upper mediastinal re-tunneling vs. mediastinal drainage alone in McKeown esophagectomy of esophageal cancer: a retrospective study.

Although mediastinal drainage may lower the risk of anastomotic leakage, the incident rate of anastomotic leakage is still high. The current study aimed to compare the effects of mediastinal drainage combined with upper mediastinal re-tunneling with mediastinal drainage only on anastomotic leakage after McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. From October 2018 to March 2021, 52 patients diagnosed as esophageal carcinoma were included in the study. 21 patients received mediastinal drainage combined with upper mediastinal re-tunneling (re-tunneling group) and 31 received mediastinal drainage only (standard group) after McKeown esophagectomy. The incidence rate of anastomotic leakage, mediastinal infection, chylothorax, thoracic infection, the peak value of leukocyte count and the mortality related to anastomotic leakage were compared between the two groups. One (4.8%) patient in the re-tunneling group developed anastomotic leakage, and no patient experienced mediastinal infection or thoracic infection. Four (12.9%) patients in the standard group developed anastomotic leakage, and all these patients experienced mediastinal infection and thoracic infection (p < 0.05). The drainage volumes of patients in the re-tunneling group and the standard group were (170 ± 60) ml and (155 ± 45) ml, respectively, with no significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). The peak values of leukocyte count and temperature in the re-tunneling group were (14.28 ± 1.12) × 109/L and (38.6 ± 1.1) °C, both lower than that of the standard group[ (16.48 ± 1.15) × 109/L and (38.9 ± 1.2) °C, respectively]. But the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). No anastomotic leakage related death occurred in both groups. Mediastinal drainage combined with upper mediastinal re-tunneling after McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer may decrease the risk of anastomotic leakage, mediastinal and thoracic infection, reduce the inflammatory response of patients, but did not increase the mortality related to anastomotic leakage. The study was retrospectively registered.

Outcomes of Mediastinal Envelope Closure During Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy

BackgroundLimited outcomes data exists regarding whether mediastinal envelope closure during minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is related to outcomes including anastomotic leak and postoperative pyloric dilation. We hypothesized that mediastinal envelope closure would be associated with fewer adverse outcomes. MethodsPatients undergoing MIE between 9/1/2017 and 11/15/2021 were studied. Patients were divided into two groups, complete envelope closure (CC) or partially closed/ not closed (NC), and baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate variables associated with a composite outcome of anastomotic leak and/or pyloric dilation. ResultsWe identified 181 patients. Age, sex, race/ethnicity, BMI, smoking history, CCI, ECOG status, operative duration, cancer stage/histology, intraoperative fluids, EBL, and EEA size were not statistically different between the CC and NC groups, though use of indocyanine green-enhanced fluorescence evaluation (ICG) was significantly different (24.5% versus 67.6%, p <0.001). The CC group experienced lower rates of anastomotic leak (2% vs 14.7%, p = 0.007), postoperative pyloric dilation (15.6% vs 32.4%, p = 0.025), and delayed gastric emptying (6.1% vs 20.6%, p = 0.015). Risk factors for a composite outcome defined as anastomotic leak and/or pyloric dilation were evaluated using a multivariable logistic regression, and NC was an independent predictor of this composite outcome (aOR 3.74, p = 0.007). ConclusionsComplete mediastinal envelope closure is associated with decreased rates of anastomotic leak, postoperative pyloric dilation, and delayed gastric emptying. Further prospective trials involving mediastinal envelope closure are warranted to elucidate its positive effect on postoperative outcomes.

Comparative Analysis of Surgical Outcomes in Hybrid and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Regional Russian Cancer Centre Experience.

Surgery is pivotal in treating esophageal cancer; hybrid esophagectomy, which combines minimally invasive and open techniques, shows promising outcomes. This historical cohort study compared the surgical outcomes of standard open esophagectomy with hybrid esophagectomy. Overall, 58 patients who underwent either hybrid or open esophagectomy at the Ulyanovsk Regional Clinical Oncology Clinic, Russia, from January 2015 to December 2023 were included. Data on demographics, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. The primary measures were overall complications and anastomotic leakage rates. Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson's Chi square test and t test via StatTech software (version 2.8.8). The number of removed lymph nodes was higher in the hybrid group (24±9) than in the open group (15±7) (P<0.001). In addition, the hybrid esophagectomy group showed significant reductions in operational time and blood loss (P<0.001 and P=0.014, respectively). The need for blood transfusion was higher in the open esophagectomy group (P=0.043). The postoperative length of stay in the hospital did not differ significantly between the two groups (open=20±8 days, hybrid=17±7 days, P=0.178). Cardiac complications were more frequent after an open esophagectomy (P=0.044). Hybrid esophagectomy reduced postoperative cardiac complications and other adverse events while maintaining satisfactory oncological outcomes. It had advantages over standard open esophagectomy in terms of lymphadenectomy, operative time, blood loss, and transfusion requirements, suggesting its efficacy for esophageal cancer patients.

Analyzing the Role of Mechanical Bowel Preparation on Surgical Outcomes in Colorectal Surgery

Despite improved postoperative recovery from the use of minimally invasive procedures and enhanced recovery after surgery protocols in recent decades, colectomy is still associated with morbidity. Surgical site infections range from trivial wound infections to potentially deadly colonic anastomotic leaks. Objectives: To compare the outcome results regarding postoperative complications of Mechanical Bowel Preparation and Non-Medical Bowel Preparation groups in elective colorectal surgery at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Peshawar, Pakistan. Methods: The research was a quasi-experimental study. In this study, 210 patients were included; they were divided into 2 groups: Mechanical Bowel Preparation Group and the Non-Mechanical Bowel Preparation Group. Data were collected through electronic health records. The data were analysed using SPSS software version 26.0. Descriptive statistics, such as the Chi-Square test, were applied to the results. Results: There was no statistically significant difference regarding the surgical outcomes and the demographics between the Mechanical Bowel Preparation and Mechanical Bowel Preparation groups. The escalation of the surgical site infection looked lower when the Mechanical Bowel Preparation was not in use i.e 20 (19.05%) in the Mechanical Bowel Preparation group and 14 (13.33%) in the Non-Mechanical Bowel Preparation group, but it did not seem to be, statistically significant; p-value=0.261014. The anastomotic leak rates and intra-abdominal collection rates do not differ significantly between the two groups; p&gt;0.05. Conclusions: It was concluded that there was no statistical significance between the groups of mechanical bowel preparation and non-mechanical bowel preparation concerning surgical site infections, anastomotic leakages, and other colorectal surgery complications.

Clinical features, surgical treatment strategy, and feasibility of minimally invasive surgery for synchronous and metachronous multiple colorectal cancers: A 14-year single-center experience.

Patients with a history of colorectal cancer (CRC) are at increased risk of developing secondary synchronous/metachronous CRCs. The role of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for multiple CRCs remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the short-term outcomes of MIS in patients with multiple CRCs and elucidate their clinical characteristics. This retrospective study reviewed CRC patients who underwent MIS between 2010 and 2023. Multiple CRC cases were categorized into synchronous and metachronous cohorts. Demographics, pathological findings, and perioperative outcomes were analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed as appropriate. A total of 1,272 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 99 (7.8%) having multiple CRCs (75 synchronous and 24 metachronous). Multiple CRC patients had a higher prevalence of strong family history (8.1% vs. 1.0%, P < 0.001) and right-sided colon cancer (55.6% vs. 34.4%, P < 0.001) compared to solitary CRC patients. MSI-high/MMR-deficient status, including Lynch syndrome, was frequently observed among patients with multiple CRCs. Synchronous CRCs requiring double-anastomosis were associated with longer operation times (P = 0.03) and increased blood loss (P = 0.03) compared to those with a single-anastomosis. In the metachronous cohort, repeat operation patterns were categorized based on tumor location and sacrificed arteries. Preservation of the left-colic artery avoided extended colectomy in some patients. Patients with multiple CRC involving rectal cancer had a higher anastomotic leakage (AL) rate (17.6% vs. 5.7%, P < 0.01); however, this difference in AL rate disappeared after PSM (8.8% vs. 8.8%, P = 1.0). In patients with multiple CRCs, AL has not been observed ever since the indocyanine green fluorescence imaging was implemented. MIS is feasible for multiple CRCs, with perioperative outcomes comparable to those for solitary CRCs. Preservation of critical arteries may benefit patients at high risk of secondary CRCs, particularly those with a strong family history of CRC, right-sided tumors, or MSI-high/MMR-deficient profiles, including Lynch syndrome.

Impact of Clostridium difficile Infection Versus Colonization on Postoperative Outcomes After Oncological Colorectal Surgery: An Observational Single-Center Study With Propensity Score Analysis.

There is limited research available concerning the risk anastomotic leakage in the context of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Herein, we aim to elucidate the correlation between CDI, encompassing both preoperative asymptomatic C. difficile carriers (CDC) and postoperative hospital acquired C. difficile infections (HA-CDI), and the occurrence of anastomotic leakage in patients undergoing oncological colorectal surgery. This is an observational, single-center study. Data were sourced from surgical logs between 2018 and 2023, via the hospital's electronic system. Patients were split into three subgroups: CDC, HA-CDI, and control group (CG). Groups were compared in terms of patient characteristics, morbidity, and mortality via Fisher's exact test and Kruskal-Wallis test. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed to reduce selection bias. A total of 522 patients were analyzed, split into three subgroups: CDC, n = 35; HA-CDI, n = 27; CG, n = 460. One-to-one propensity score matching reduced the CG to 62 patients. Patients in the HA-CDI group had higher rates of overall morbidity (p < 0.0001), higher rates of anastomotic leaks (p = 0.002), more surgical site infections (SSI) (p = 0.001), and a longer length of stay (26 vs. 11.2 vs. 9.3 days, p < 0.001), while patients in the CDC group had comparable rates of complications with the CG. HA-CDI is associated with a higher risk of anastomotic leak after oncological colorectal surgery, while asymptomatic CDC do not have higher morbidity and may be operated electively, under standard CD treatment.

Repair of Type C Tracheo-esophageal Fistula/Esophageal Atresia With or Without Trans Anastomotic Tube: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

BackgroundThe use of trans anastomotic feeding tube (TAFT) during the repair of Esophageal atresia/Tracheo-esophageal fistula (EA/TEF) aims to enhance outcomes by enabling early feeding, reducing the requirement for parenteral nutrition, and reducing complications such as anastomotic leak by stenting the anastomosis. However, TAFT's benefits and drawbacks are debated due to conflicting reports. Thus, we conducted a prospective pilot randomized control trial to elucidate the impact of TAFT on postoperative outcomes and the potential benefits of avoidance of TAFT. MethodsWe performed a single-center randomized controlled trial in 53 neonates diagnosed with Type C EA/TEF who were operated on from January 2022 to June 2023. The patients were randomized into TAFT (n = 30) and non-TAFT (n = 23) groups. The patients were followed up for a minimum of 6 months following discharge. The primary objective of the study was to compare the rate of anastomotic leaks following primary repair of EA/TEF in both groups. Secondary objectives included early postoperative outcomes such as the occurrence of anastomotic stricture, time taken to initiate feeding, the time required to reach full feeding, the incidence of brief resolved unexplained events (BRUE) or acute life-threatening events (ALTE), the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux (GER), somatic growth, and all-cause mortality within 30 days post-surgery. ResultThe study demonstrated that TAFT placement was associated with a higher incidence of anastomotic leaks (20 % vs 0, p = 0.03). However, there was no difference in the 30-day mortality between both groups. Although the rate of anastomotic strictures and GER was higher in the TAFT group (54.5 % vs 27.8 %, p = 0.08 and 25 % vs 57.1 %, p = 0.076), it did not reach statistical significance. Avoiding TAFT resulted in earlier initiation of enteral feeding (18 vs 22 days, p = 0.002), shorter time to achieve full feeds (15 vs 21 days, p = 0.03), reduced duration of TPN (3 vs 10 days; p = 0.001), improved weight gain at the 2-week follow-up (27.5 vs. 24.4 g/kg/day, p-value = 0.037) and lesser incidence of ALTE/BRUE (11.1 % vs 48 %, p = 0.01) at 6 months. ConclusionWhile previous research has covered TAFT's impact on complications such as anastomotic leak, stricture, use of TPN and enteral feed, prospective randomized studies remain limited, and the impact on GER, somatic growth, and occurrence of ALTE/BRUE is still unexplored. This study evaluated the short-term outcomes of EA/TEF in a resource-challenged setting, shedding light on the potential benefits of repair without TAFT such as reduction in the rate of anastomotic leak, earlier feeding, reduced GER, better somatic growth and reduced incidence of ALTE/BRUE. Level of EvidenceLevel II (Treatment study/Randomized controlled trial).

Impact of oral antithrombotic agents on urinary continence recovery following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundRobot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is a preferred minimally invasive surgical treatment for prostate cancer. The number of elderly patients and those with cardiovascular and/or cerebrovascular issues undergoing surgery is increasing, and many of them are taking antithrombotic (AT) agents. However, the effect of AT agents on postoperative urinary recovery has not been adequately studied. In this study, we analyzed the differences in the postoperative recovery of urinary continence and oncological outcomes in patients undergoing RARP for localized prostate cancer between AT agent adherents and non-adherents.MethodsA total of 394 patients who underwent conventional anterior RARP between February 2015 and February 2021 were categorized into two groups: those taking oral AT agents (AT group) and the control group. Urinary continence recovery, complications, and oncological outcomes were compared between the groups. A Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to identify clinical factors that affect urinary continence recovery.ResultsThe background data and bleeding complications did not differ significantly between the groups. The recovery of continence was significantly poorer in the AT group in terms of complete pad free (HR: 0.53 [95% CI: 0.39–0.71]) and use of ≤ 1 safety pad (HR: 0.74 [95% CI: 0.59–0.94]). The rate of anastomotic leakage on cystography was significantly higher in the AT group (20.9% vs. 6.7%). A univariate analysis revealed that taking antithrombotic agents, higher prostate-specific antigen levels, and a more advanced clinical stage were associated with a poor urinary continence recovery; a multivariate analysis showed that taking AT agents was an independent factor negatively associated with urinary continence recovery. There was no significant difference between the groups in the positive surgical margin rate (19.0% vs. 23.8%) or the biochemical-recurrence-free rate.ConclusionTaking oral AT agents may be associated with poor urinary continence recovery after RARP.

The Combined Effect of Western Diet Consumption and Diclofenac Administration Alters the Gut Microbiota and Promotes Anastomotic Leakage in the Distal Colon.

Obesity, Western diet (WD) consumption, and the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are co-occurring and modifiable factors associated with microbiome dysbiosis and anastomotic leakage. We studied the combined effect of a Western-type diet (WD) and diclofenac, a standard NSAID used in surgical patients, on anastomotic healing and gut microbiota composition following distal colon resection. Forty-two rats were fed a WD for 6 weeks, after which they were randomized to either parenteral diclofenac 3 mg/kg/day or saline started on the day of surgery and continued for three days. The surgical procedure involved distal colon resection with anastomosis. Animals were sacrificed on postoperative day (POD)-3 or POD-5. Anastomotic healing was assessed and correlated with diclofenac treatment and gut microbiota composition, analyzed by 16S rRNA marker gene amplicon sequencing. Mucosal integrity of the anastomosis was evaluated by histological analysis. Anastomotic leakage rate was 100 percent (8/8) in diclofenac-treated rats and 10 percent (1/10) in saline-treated controls on POD-5. Diclofenac administration in WD-fed animals induced a shift in microbiota composition, characterized by an increase in microbiota diversity on POD-5 and a significant 15-fold, 4-fold, and 16-fold increase of Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Verrucomicrobia, respectively. Diclofenac use in WD-fed animals caused mucosal erosion on POD-5, a phenomenon not observed in control animals. Consumption of a Western diet combined with diclofenac administration shifts the microbiota composition, associated with clinically relevant AL in the distal colon of rats.

Predictability of anastomotic leaks in visceral surgery

Anastomotic leakage in visceral surgery is associated with alarge number of known and also unknown or even unmeasurable parameters. Furthermore, the associations between the individual factors are intertwined and complex. According to current data a preoperative prediction is not reliably possible and should be distinguished from intraoperative or postoperative prediction models. Most studies on this topic do not exceed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.70. Athorough understanding of statistics and prediction models is necessary to correctly interpret the published works. Due to the relatively low incidence rate of anastomotic leakage from a statistical point of view, large datasets are required for adequate prediction. Multimodal data and complex algorithms can potentially handle big data more accurately and improve predictability; however, these models have so far not been applied in the clinical routine.

The use of indocyanine green for colorectal anastomoses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Anastomotic leak is a relatively common and debilitating complication. Colorectal leak rates vary widely in the literature, ranging from 1% to 20%. In modern surgical practice, there is much emphasis on the use of indocyanine green (ICG). This is a fluorescent dye administered intravenously to locate and predict an adequate line of anastomosis. We sought to analyse the current literature and supporting evidence behind the use of ICG in the context of elective colorectal surgery. A literature search was conducted for papers published between January 1991 and December 2022 concerning the use of ICG in colorectal surgery. Data on anastomotic leak, overall complication rate, operative time and involvement of artificial intelligence (AI) were compared. A total of 24 studies were selected, including 3 randomised controlled trials. There was an anastomotic leak rate of 4.3% in cases with ICG administration compared with 9.5% in the control group (p<0.00001). Seven studies mentioned overall complication rates. These were lower in the ICG cohort than in the control group (15.5% vs 24.5%). There was no significant correlation between ICG use and operative time (p=0.78). Five studies looked at AI, with results suggesting that use of AI leads to much better accuracy in ICG metric analysis. However, the current literature is still inconclusive. While there is strong evidence behind ICG use in the existing literature, more randomised controlled trials are required for better recommendations. AI in ICG metric interpretation has proved to be difficult owing to interpatient variability. Nevertheless, new data suggest better understanding and standardisation.