Anastomosis For Rectal Cancer Research Articles

Efficacy of lymph node dissection around the inferior mesenteric artery with preservation of the left colic artery for rectal cancer

AbstractObjectiveWe investigated how Japanese D3 dissection with left colic artery (LCA) preservation affects anastomotic leakage after anterior resection with anastomosis for rectal cancer, based on the leak rate. The correlation between LCA preservation, survival, and cancer recurrence after resection was also analyzed.Summary and Background DataIt remains unclear how LCA preservation affects the anastomotic leak rate and oncological outcomes after resection remains unclear. Some reports suggested that anastomotic leakage increases local recurrence and decreases cancer‐specific survival.MethodsIn this study, we enrolled and analyzed 457 patients who underwent radical resection of rectal cancer in the period October 2011 through December 2016. The attending surgeon decided preoperatively and registered whether to preserve the LCA. This trial was registered under the UMIN‐CTR Identifier UMIN000006160.ResultsD3 with LCA preservation was successfully completed in 218 (89.3%) of the 244 patients registered in this group, whereas D3 without LCA preservation was successfully completed in all 213 patients registered in this group. After propensity score matching, the anastomotic leakage rate was 7.86% (11/140) after D3 with LCA preservation and 7.14% (10/140) after D3 without LCA preservation. The overall survival rates were 90.1% and 89.3%, and the recurrence‐free survival rates were 77.6% and 77.3%, respectively.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that LCA preservation has no effect on the incidence of anastomotic leakage after rectal resection with anastomosis using DST and that oncological outcomes may not be affected.

Factors Associated with Leakage after Reversal of Protective Stoma in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Following Curative Resection and Anastomosis

IntroductionAnastomotic leakage (AL) is a significant complication in colorectal surgery with numerous general and specific risk factors. The determinants of colorectal AL following the reversal of a protective defunctioning ileostomy remain unclear and warrant further investigation. Material and MethodsData from April 2008 to December 2014 were collected and retrospectively reviewed for 361 consecutive patients who underwent protective ileostomy reversal following curative resection with anastomosis for rectal cancer. The baseline, treatment, and oncological variables of patients associated with post-reversal AL were evaluated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. The impact of AL on long-term survival outcomes was assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. ResultsIn a study of 361 patients, 52 (14.4%) experienced leakage following stoma reversal, manifesting at a median of 5.7 months. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that an anastomosis located less than 7 cm from the anal verge (OR 2.82, p = 0.008), a side-to-end anastomotic configuration (OR 2.02, p = 0.036), involvement of the circumferential resection margin (OR 6.46, p = 0.043), and adjuvant radiotherapy (OR 4.69, p = 0.003) significantly predicted post-reversal AL. Notably, five-year overall survival (63.4% vs. 90.3%, p < 0.0001) and disease-free survival (46.9% vs. 71.1%, p = 0.001) were significantly lower in patients with post-reversal AL. ConclusionsOur analysis identified several clinicopathological factors associated with post-reversal AL, which is linked to a significant decrease in long-term survival and oncological outcomes. Alleviating these adverse effects necessitates ensuring early detection and effective management of leaks among high-risk patients.

Systemic assessment of manual circular stapler versus powered circular stapler for anastomosis in rectal cancer: A large-scale Chinese multicenter prospective cohort study.

Mechanical anastomosis in rectal cancer surgery offers several advantages but is plagued by complications like leaks and strictures. Variations in surgeons' experiences affect outcomes, but powered circular anastomosis has emerged as a promising solution, ensuring uniform staple formation and reducing manual manipulation. This multicenter, randomized, parallel-controlled study in China compared IntoCare™'s powered circular staplers (ICS) with manual circular staplers (MCS) in 382 patients (195 ICS, 187 MCS). Both groups had comparable anastomotic leakage rates. ICS significantly reduced anastomosis time while maintaining similar safety profiles. Postoperative recovery and complication rates were closely matched. The use of ICS in rectal cancer surgeries effectively reduces anastomosis time without compromising safety, offering a promising innovation to enhance the efficacy of rectal cancer surgeries while maintaining patient safety.

Systemic assessment of manual circular stapler versus powered circular stapler for anastomosis in rectal cancer: A multicenter prospective cohort study.

e15614 Background: Mechanical anastomosis offers several advantages over traditional hand-sutured anastomosis. However, complications such as anastomotic leaks, strictures, and bleeding persist due to factors like interactions between staples and tissue. Powered circular anastomosis is an effective method to address these issues. Currently, there are no domestic studies on the application of powered-anastomosis technology in colorectal anastomosis. Methods: The study adopted a multicenter, randomized, parallel-controlled, non-inferiority study design, with a 1:1 random allocation ratio. The study involved 187 patients with rectal cancer who underwent Dixon surgery using IntoCare™ disposable powered circular stapler (ICS), and 195 patients who received similar process with manual circular stapler (MCS). The efficacy of stapler was evaluated by anastomosis success rate, anastomosis-related adverse events, anastomosis device performance assessment, operation time, anastomosis time, and postoperative recovery. Safety evaluation indicators included adverse events, vital signs, and laboratory tests. Results: Baseline demographic characteristics showed no notable disparities between two groups (Table 1). A high proportion of patients, 99.47% in the MCS group and 99.49% in the ICS group, successfully completed anastomosis. In the MCS group, the average anastomosis duration was clocked at 2.84 minutes (min) (±2.3), with a median time of 2.0 min (ranging from 1.0 to 22.0 min). In contrast, the ICS group exhibited a slightly quicker average anastomosis duration of 2.40 min (±1.7), and a comparable median time of 2.0 min (but with a narrower range from 1.0 to 15.0 min). Adverse events did not differ significantly between two groups. Conclusions: The results uncovered the powered stapler could considerably reduce stapling time while maintaining a safety profile. Notably, the incidence of patients with anastomotic leakage one month post-surgery, and anastomotic stricture six months post-surgery in the powered stapler group, was lower than those in the manual stapler group. This suggests that the anastomosis created by the powered stapler is more stable and promotes more effective postoperative anastomotic healing. Clinical trial information: NCT05879172 . [Table: see text]

IDEAL Stage 2a/b prospective cohort study of transanal transection and single-stapled anastomosis for rectal cancer.

There are several anastomotic techniques available to facilitate restorative rectal cancer surgery after total mesorectal excision (TME), including double-stapled anastomosis (DST) and handsewn coloanal anastomosis (CAA). However, to date no one technique is superior with regard to anastomotic leakage (AL) or functional outcomes. Transanal transection single-stapled anastomosis (TTSS) aims to overcome some of the technical challenges and offer comparable clinical and functional outcomes to traditional anastomotic techniques. The aim of this study was to explore the role of TTSS in modern rectal cancer surgery and to provide comparative clinical and functional outcome data with DST and CAA. A prospective cohort study was undertaken to assess the safety and clinical and patient-reported outcomes associated with the TTSS procedure. All patients undergoing sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer with an anastomosis performed within 6 cm of the anal verge between January 2016 and April 2021 were prospectively enrolled into this study. Clinical and patient-reported outcome data, including low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) assessment, were collected. The primary endpoint was anastomotic leakage within 30 days. A total of 275 patients participated in this study, with 70 (25%) patients undergoing a TTSS, 110 (40%) undergoing a DST and 95 (35%) undergoing a CAA. Patients undergoing a CAA had more distal tumours than those having a TTSS or DST, with a median tumour height of 5, 7 and 9 cm (p < 0.001), respectively. We observed a statistically significant reduction in AL in the TTSS group compared with the DST group, with rates of 8.6% versus 20.9% (p = 0.028). There was no difference in LARS scores between patients undergoing TTSS and DST (p = 0.228), while patients with a CAA had worse LARS scores than TTSS patients (p = 0.002). TTSS is a technically safe and feasible anastomotic technique in rectal cancer surgery as an alternative to DST and CAA. Its advantages over DST are a reduced AL rate and, over CAA, improved function. It should therefore be considered as an alternative technique to improve clinical and patient-reported outcomes in restorative rectal cancer surgery.

Colonic J-pouch versus side-to-end anastomosis for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BackgroundThis study aims to compare colonic J-pouch and side-to-end anastomosis for rectal cancer in terms of surgical and bowel functional outcomes and quality of life (QoL).MethodsA systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane. The last search was performed on March 28, 2021. All randomized controlled trials comparing colonic J-pouch with side-to-end anastomosis for rectal cancer were enrolled. The main outcomes were bowel functional outcomes and QoL. The secondary outcomes were surgical outcomes including operative time, postoperative hospital stay, complications, and mortality.ResultsNine articles incorporating 7 trials with a total of 696 patients (330 by J-pouch and 366 by side-to-end) were enrolled in this meta-analysis. The bowel functional outcomes were comparable between J-pouch and side-to-end groups in terms of stool frequency, urgency, and incomplete defecation at the short term (< 8 months), medium term (8–18 months), and long term (> 18 months) follow up evaluations. No difference was observed between groups with regards to QoL (SF-36: physical function, social function, and general health perception). Besides, surgical outcomes were also similar in two groups.ConclusionThe currently limited evidence suggests that colonic J-pouch and side-to-end anastomosis are comparable in terms of bowel functional outcomes, QoL, and surgical outcomes. Surgeons may choose either of the two techniques for anastomosis. A large sample randomized controlled study comparing colonic J-pouch and side-to-end anastomosis for rectal cancer is warranted.

Efficacy of an additional flap operation in bladder-preserving surgery with radical prostatectomy and cystourethral anastomosis for rectal cancer involving the prostate

PurposeSphincter-preserving operations performed with bladder-preserving surgery and a cystourethral anastomosis (CUA) do not require a urinary stoma, but leakage from the CUA may develop. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of performing an additional flap operation.MethodsThe subjects were 39 patients who underwent bladder-preserving surgery for advanced rectal cancer involving the prostate, between 2001 and 2015.32 of whom had a CUA and one of whom had a neobladder. Five of these 32 patients underwent an ileal flap operation, 2 underwent an omental flap operation, and 3 underwent an operation using both flaps.ResultsLeakage developed in 3 (30%) of the 10 patients who underwent additional flap operations, but in 14 (60.9%) of the 23 patients who did not undergo a flap operation. The mean periods of catheterization for the patients who suffered leakage were 31 weeks (8–108 weeks) in those without a flap and 16 weeks (8–20 weeks) in those with a flap. Four (33.3%) of the 12 patients with leakage after surgery without a flap had a period of urinary catheterization >30 weeks, and 2 (16.7%) had leakage of CTCAE grade 3. There were no cases of leakage after flap surgery.ConclusionAn additional flap operation may decrease the risk of leakage from a CUA.

Incidence and its Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infection in Sphincter Preserving Operation with a Transabdominal Side-to-end Anastomosis for Rectal Cancer

Incidence and its Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infection in Sphincter Preserving Operation with a Transabdominal Side-to-end Anastomosis for Rectal Cancer

New technique of compression anastomosis in colorectal surgery - first results in 25 patients in Macedonia.

Clinical evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of compression anastomosis with ColonRing™ for large-bowel end-to-end anastomosis for rectal cancer and explanation of the procedure and the device itself since this device is used for the first time in our clinic. In November, 2012, a team of surgeons from our clinic attended the Clinical practice workshop in Belgrade, Serbia which was organized by the World Congress of Compression Anastomosis (WCCA) and held by its President Prof. Dr. Steven Wexner from Cleveland Clinic in USA. On this workshop, all aspects of technical point of view were obtained and surgeons were certified for the technique. A total of 25 patients have been scheduled for elective colorectal surgery with subsequent compression anastomosis using ColonRing. All patients were operated for high and mid rectal cancers excluding the low rectal cancers, since those patients are usually diverted with decompressive ileostomy. Patients, who are diverted, are at higher risk of retaining the ring, after its dislodgement, in the ampulla of the rectum since they do not have natural excretion of stool via the anus. All patients were followed for anastomotic leak, anastomotic bleeding, stricture formation, device (ColonRing) handling in general and time of expulsion of the ring via anus. We used this technique for the first time in 2013 and since then a total of 25 patients underwent anterior resection of the rectum with subsequent colorectal compression anastomosis using ColonRing. Of all patients, 9 were female while 16 were male with median age of 64 years. All patients were operated for rectal cancers. The mean length of hospital stay was 7.4 days (range 5 to 9 days). None of the patients developed anastomotic bleeding or dehiscence. To date none of the patients developed anastomotic stricture, although some patients were followed for almost two years. The average day of expulsion from the body could not be calculated since despite, and although all patients were given instruction on how to check for ring expulsion, 21 of them did not report this event. Only 2 patients brought the ring to us. In two cases after 2 week of the initial operation, the ring was find and palpated on digital rectal examination, free in the ampulla of the rectum and was easily removed via the anus during the examination. Misfiring was reported in 1 patient (first patient) and reanastomosis was employed using another ColonRing, No perioperative mortality was observed in this patient population. End-to end colorectal anastomosis with the ColonRing is feasible and safe procedure with fast learning curve. To date, this type of anastomosis is possible in left sided colon lesions where anastomosis is contemplated below the promontory. We find the device easy to use with high level of confidence. Further prospective studies including comparison between the ColonRing device and the conventional staplers evaluating long-term anastomotic complications (i.e., leak or stricture) are needed to evaluate the benefits and limitations of this device.

Quality of Life After a Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer in Elderly Patients.

PurposeFecal incontinence is a major concern, and its incidence increases with age. Quality of life may decrease due to fecal incontinence after both sphincter-saving surgery and a rectal resection with a permanent stoma. This study investigated quality of life, with regard to fecal incontinency, in elderly patients after rectal-cancer surgery.MethodsAll patients who underwent elective rectal surgery with anastomosis for rectal cancer between December 2008 and June 2012 at two Dutch hospitals were eligible for inclusion. The Wexner and the fecal incontinence quality of life (FIQoL) scores were collected. Young (<70 years of age) and elderly (≥70 years of age) patients were compared.ResultsSeventy-nine patients were included, of whom 19 were elderly patients (24.1%). All diverting stomas that had been placed (n = 60, 75.9%) had been closed at the time of the study. There were no differences in Wexner or FIQoL scores between the young and the elderly patients. Also, there were no differences between patients without a diverting stoma and patients in whom bowel continuity had been restored. Elderly females had significantly worse scores on the FIQoL subscales of coping/behavior (P = 0.043) and depression/self-perception (P = 0.004) than young females. Elderly females scored worse on coping/behavior (P = 0.010) and depression/self-perception (P = 0.036) than elderly males. Young and elderly males had comparable scores.ConclusionQuality of life with regard to fecal incontinency is worse in elderly females after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. Patients should be informed of this impact, and a definite stoma may be considered in this patient group.

Low Anterior Resection with Coloanal Anastomosis for Rectal Cancer

Conventional low anterior resection with stapled or hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis is an alternative to abdominoperineal resection in selected low rectal cancers. The technique of intersphincteric resection, which includes removal of the internal sphincter, extends the possibility of sphincter preservation to patients with very low rectal tumors. Neoadjuvant treatment facilitates ultralow conservative surgery for locally advanced disease by inducing downstaging. Oncological results of conventional coloanal anastomosis and intersphincteric resection are similar to those of abdominoperineal resection, in terms of local control and survival. The restrictions of conservative surgery appear to be functional rather than oncologic. Rectal reconstruction using a colonic pouch decreases functional gastrointestinal disorders following coloanal anastomosis. The J-pouch is the standard reservoir, whereas the transverse coloplasty and side-to-end anastomosis constitute an alternative. Through utilization of new concepts and optimal surgical techniques for sphincter preservation, abdominoperineal resection should prove necessary for only 10% of rectal cancers.

Colonic J-Pouch-Anal Anastomosis for Rectal Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Handsewn vs. Stapled Anastomosis

Colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis performed after complete proctectomy and total mesorectal excision for adenocarcinoma of the rectum can be handsewn or stapled. Stapling the coloanal anastomosis is believed to shorten operating time and reduce morbidity, but there are no randomized trials comparing the techniques. Between January 1999 and May 2001, all patients with rectal adenocarcinoma requiring total mesorectal excision were randomized intraoperatively to handsewn or stapled anastomosis. Mortality, intraoperative, and postoperative findings and functional results at 3, 6, and 12 months were analyzed. Thirty-seven patients (12 females; mean age, 60 +/- 10 years) were randomized (stapled group: n = 20; handsewn group: n = 17). The two groups were comparable for age, gender, distance between the tumor and the levator ani, tumor volume, and use of preoperative radiotherapy (3 in each group). Morbidity did not differ between stapled group (3/20) and handsewn group (4/17; P > 0.05). Mean +/- standard deviation operative time was shorter in stapled group (261 +/- 40 minutes) than in handsewn group (314 +/- 46 minutes; P = 0.0008), and median distance between the anastomosis and the anal verge was shorter in handsewn group (19 +/- 9 mm) than in stapled group (27 +/- 8 mm; P = 0.01). Three patients of handsewn group and none of stapled group developed an anastomotic stricture requiring a single digital dilation (not significant). Number of stools per 24 hours, urgency, incidence of fragmented stools, degree of continence, requirement for protective pad, and/or need to take medication at 3, 6, and 12 months were similar in both groups. Stapled co-loanal anastomosis is significantly faster than handsewn CAA and has similar functional results. It should be the preferred technique when it is feasible.

Prevention of Anovaginal Fistula during Double-Stapling of Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis

Recto- or anovaginal fistula is a troublesome complication of double-stapling technique in ultralow rectal anastomosis for rectal cancer or in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. In this study, a technique for preventing this problem by means of separation of the vaginal wall during the stapler firing is described using a flexible spatula introduced through the rectovaginal septum into the peritoneal cavity.

Clinical effects of preoperative radiation therapy on anorectal function after proctectomy and colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis.

Preoperative radiotherapy is increasingly used for certain rectal cancers, although some evidence suggests that it may adversely affect anorectal function. Reconstruction with a colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis after complete proctectomy is thought to improve function, but few published data on pouch function after radiation exists. The aim of our study was to compare long-term bowel habits in patients receiving preoperative radiation for rectal cancer followed by colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis with those of patients having similar rectal cancer surgery without radiation. Patients (n = 125) having undergone colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis for rectal cancer, of whom 28 had preoperative radiotherapy and 97 did not, responded to a detailed questionnaire about their bowel habits at least 12 months after surgery, with a mean (+/- standard deviation) interval of 64 (+/-42) months. Radiation was administered preoperatively as a short (25 Gy over 5 days, n = 22) or long (45 Gy over 4 weeks, n = 6) course. All patients had colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis with manual anastomosis at or immediately above the dentate line. Except for tumor stage, no preoperative difference was observed between the two groups. The number of bowel movements per 24 hours in patients with and without radiation was 1.8 (+/-0.8) and 1.8 (+/-1.5), respectively (P> 0.05). In the irradiated group, diarrhea (39 vs.13 percent, P= 0.005) and nocturnal defecation (36 vs.15 percent, P= 0.03) were more frequent than in the nonirradiated group. No other significant difference existed between groups with regard to stool clustering, use of protective pads, ability to defer evacuation >15 minutes, ability to evacuate the bowel within 30 minutes, incontinence score, use of medications, or dietary restriction. Preoperative radiotherapy followed by proctectomy and colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis significantly increased nocturnal defecation frequency and diarrhea compared with similar nonirradiated patients but had no influence on the other bowel-habit parameters studied.

Invited Critique: Colostomy vs Tube Cecostomy for Protection of a Low Anastomosis in Rectal Cancer

Invited Critique: Colostomy vs Tube Cecostomy for Protection of a Low Anastomosis in Rectal Cancer

Functional Results of Colonic J-Pouch Anastomosis for Rectal Cancer

Functional Results of Colonic J-Pouch Anastomosis for Rectal Cancer

Sphincter-saving anastomosis for rectal cancer: an overview

To review the role of sphincter-saving anastomosis in the treatment of low rectal cancer, through a review of literature, we consider the oncologic value and the impact on morbidity and mortality of abdominoperineal resection compared specifically to sphincter-saving procedures. We also review the functional results reported after sphincter-saving procedures. Sphincter-saving procedures are now considered to be the first therapeutic choice in the approach to low rectal cancer. This choice is based on both the appraisal of the oncologic validity of this option and also on the realization of the significant negative impact on the quality of life to patients after an abdominoperineal resection. Functional results after sphincter saving procedures seem to be related to the length of the remaining rectal stump and the addition of a colonic J-pouch and have been documented as beneficial. In conclusion our review supports the trend towards sphincter-saving procedures as a first choice in the treatment of low rectal cancer. Tumours located at or near the spincter or the dentate line and preexisting incontinence still remain indications for abdominoperineal resection.

Adenocarcinoma arising on the site of a Gelpi retractor after coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer

Adenocarcinoma arising on the site of a Gelpi retractor after coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer

Coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer. Long-term results at the Mayo and Cleveland Clinics.

This study was designed to determine functional outcomes and rates of survival and recurrence of coloanal anastomosis in rectal cancer patients. Between 1981 and 1991, 117 patients underwent coloanal anastomosis. Fifteen percent of the patients had a J-pouch; the rest had a straight coloanal anastomosis. Thirty-eight percent had no diverting stoma. Median distance of the tumor from the anal verge was 6.7 cm. Local recurrence rate was 7 percent. Five-year survival was fully 69 percent. Satisfactory fecal continence was achieved by 78 percent of patients; no J-pouch patient had frequent incontinence. Sixty-two percent of the patients had major (anastomotic leak = 18 percent) or minor complications; complications were not mitigated by a diverting stoma or worsened by adjuvant therapy. Although coloanal anastomosis is associated with a high chance of complications, the long-term outcome, in terms of disease-free survival and satisfactory function, is excellent.

Adjuvant radiotherapy and anastomosis in rectal cancer--disturbing evidence from animal studies.

Adjuvant radiotherapy is used increasingly in the management of rectal cancer. However, ionizing radiation is mutagenic, and, superimposed on a background of increased cellular proliferation as seen around anastomoses and in colorectal cancer patients, there is the potential for enhanced metachronous cancer risk. The influence of preoperative irradiation on both carcinogenesis and cellular proliferation at colonic anastomoses was explored in 180 adult male F344 rats. Orthovoltage x-rays were delivered to the distal descending colon by parallel opposed fields. Ninety rats received 16 Gy in one fraction; the remainder received 36 Gy in two fractions one week apart. In each irradiation group 18 rats either acted as controls or one week after radiotherapy underwent distal colotomy and repair. We found the descending colon susceptible to radiation carcinogenesis; 26 colorectal tumors developed in the low-dose irradiation group and 47 in the high-dose group (P = 0.0008; Mann-Whitney U test, 16 vs. 36 Gy). Preferential tumor development was seen in the anastomotic region. In those animals that underwent surgery and irradiation, among the low-dose irradiation group only 3 of 72 had tumors within the descending colon compared with 21 of 72 at the anastomotic site (McNemar's test chi-squared = 40.9; P < 0.001), and in the high-dose irradiation group 5 of 72 had tumors within the descending colon compared with 36 of 72 at the anastomotic site (McNemar's test chi-squared = 22.0; P < 0.001). Anastomotic crypt cell production rates were increased for at least three months following exposure to irradiation (16 Gy: f = 15.1, P < 0.005; 32 Gy: f = 9.4, P < 0.005). Radiation carcinogenesis is greatly enhanced at colonic anastomoses and may result from altered anastomotic proliferation. This has potentially disturbing implications in view of the increasing use of adjuvant radiotherapy for rectal carcinoma.