Analysis Of Progression-free Survival Research Articles

Long term follow-up of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated by intraoperative photodynamic therapy: an update from the INDYGO trial (NCT03048240).

Glioblastoma remains incurable despite optimal multimodal management. The interim analysis of open label, single arm INDYGO pilot trial showed actuarial 12-months progression-free survival (PFS) of 60% (median 17.1months), actuarial 12-months overall survival (OS) of 80% (median 23.1months). We report updated, exploratory analyses of OS, PFS, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) for patients receiving intraoperative photodynamic therapy (PDT) with 5-aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride (5-ALA HCl). Ten patients were included (May 2017 - April 2021) for standardized therapeutic approach including 5-ALA HCl fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS), followed by intraoperative PDT with a single 200J/cm2 dose of light. Postoperatively, patients received adjuvant therapy (Stupp protocol) then followed every 3months (clinical and cerebral MRI) and until disease progression and/or death. Procedure safety and toxicity occurring during the first four weeks after PDT were assessed. Data concerning relapse, HRQOL and survival were prospectively collected and analyzed. At the cut-off date (i.e., November 1st 2023), median follow-up was 23months (9,7-71,4). No unacceptable or unexpected toxicities and no treatment-related deaths occurred during the study. Kaplan-Meier estimated 23.4months median OS, actuarial 12-month PFS rate 60%, actuarial 12-month, 24-month, and 5-year OS rates 80%, 50% and 40%, respectively. Four patients were still alive (1 patient free of recurrence). At 5years-follow-up, intraoperative PDT with surgical maximal excision as initial therapy and standard adjuvant treatment suggests an increase of time to recurrence and overall survival in a high proportion of patients. Quality of life was maintained without any severe side effects. NCT03048240. EudraCT number: 2016-002706-39.

Abstract PO1-05-10: Clinical effectiveness of CDK4/6 inhibitors in HER2-low metastatic breast cancer

Abstract Introduction: There is growing evidence indicating that human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-low is a unique subtype of breast cancer that comprises a substantial share of patients historically classified as HER2 negative. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) are important in the treatment of hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Whether HER2-low status or the level of HER2 gene amplification have prognostic significance for HR+/HER2-negative MBC patients treated with ET and CDK4/6i remains an area of active investigation. Methods: Patients diagnosed with HR+/HER2-negative MBC and who were treated with palbociclib, ribociclib, or abemaciclib from 6/10/2015 to 12/28/2022 were selected from the Montefiore Health system database and followed until 3/24/2023. HER2-0 was defined as immunohistochemistry (IHC) 0, and HER2-low was defined as IHC 1+ or IHC 2+/in situ hybridization negative by 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines. Median values were used to establish cutoffs for HER2/CEP17 ratio and HER2 gene copy number (GCN). Characteristics of the patients and tumors in the subgroups were compared using chi-squared/Fisher’s exact test for categorical data and Kruskal-Wallis/Wilcox signed rank tests for continuous data. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analysis were used to compare overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Results: 239 patients received CDK4/6i, with 46 HER2-0 and 193 HER2-low patients. There was no statistically significant difference in clinicopathological characteristics between both cohorts. No significant differences were observed in median OS (36 vs 34 months, P > 0.9) and median PFS (44 vs 35 months, P = 0.4) between HER2-0 and HER2-low patients. Adjusting for HER2 status, multivariable analysis showed no statistically significant association between HER2-low status and worse OS (HR: 1.03, P = 0.9) or worse PFS (HR: 1.37, P = 0.4). The median HER2/CEP17 ratio was 1.25 (Interquartile range (IQR): 1.18-1.39), and the median HER2 GCN was 2.58 (IQR: 2.10-3.18). Median OS (25 vs 37, P = 0.15) and median PFS (35 vs 37, P = 0.15) showed no significant differences between ratio-below vs above-median patients. However, patients with GCN-below-median had significantly worse OS (25 vs 37 months, P = 0.026), with no significant difference in median PFS (38 vs 35 months, P = 0.3). Multivariate analysis revealed a significant effect of GCN-below-median on OS (HR: 0.50, P = 0.022) but not on PFS. Conclusion: The clinical effectiveness of CDK4/6i is not influenced by HER2-low status; however, the extent of HER2 gene amplification may have a substantial impact on therapy responsiveness in MBC patients undergoing CDK4/6i treatment. Table 1. Baseline characteristics of patients with MBC comparing HER2-0 vs HER2-low, above/below median HER2/CEP17 ratio, and above/below median HER2 GCN. Table 2. Median OS and PFS in patients with MBC comparing HER2-0 vs HER2-low, above/below median HER2/CEP17 ratio, and above/below median HER2 GCN. Table 3. Multivariable analysis of OS and PFS for patients with MBC comparing HER2-0 vs HER2-low, above/below median HER2/CEP17 ratio, and above/below median HER2 GCN. Citation Format: Frank Zhang, Jesus Anampa Mesias. Clinical effectiveness of CDK4/6 inhibitors in HER2-low metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-05-10.

Abstract PO2-04-07: Efficacy and Safety of First-line Therapy in Patients with HER-2 positive Advanced Breast Cancer:A network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Abstract Background: The numerous but conflicting first-line treatment regimens for Her-2 positive advanced breast cancer necessitate a comprehensive evaluation to inform clinical decision-making. In this study, we conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the efficacy and safety of different interventions. Methods: We systematically searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library and online abstracts published by ASCO, SABCS. NMA was performed using R software, STATA and Review Manager 5.4 to calculate and analyze the primary endpoint progression free survival (PFS), as well as the secondary endpoints of overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AE) higher than grade 3. Results: Out of the 8,603 manuscripts retrieved, we included 30 RCTs involving 12,045 patients in our analysis. Regarding PFS, the combination of trastuzumab with TKI was more favorable than dual-target therapy (hazard ratio=0.54, 95% [CI]: 0.40–0.72), and combination chemotherapy was superior to monotherapy (HR=0.66, 0.53-0.83). It is important to note that the addition of anthracycline did not result in improved PFS (HR=1.27, 0.87-1.86). For the HR+HER2+ population, dual-target plus endocrine therapy was more effective than single-target plus endocrine therapy (HR=0.65, 0.53-0.80). Monotherapy combined with dual-target therapy significantly improved OS and ORR compared to monotherapy with single-target therapy (HR=0.69, 0.56-0.84; OR=1.89, 1.34-2.65). A comprehensive analysis of both PFS and AE higher than grade 3 indicated that monotherapy plus dual-target therapy struck a balanced approach between effectiveness and toxicity compared to other regimens. Conclusions: Monotherapy plus dual-target therapy remains the optimal choice among all first-line treatment options for advanced breast cancer. The combination of trastuzumab with TKI demonstrated a significant improvement in PFS, but further data are warranted to confirm the survival benefit. Figure 1. Network diagrams of PFS, OS, ORR and adverse events higher than grade 3 in eligible experimental arms. Figure 2. Forest plot of PFS, OS, ORR and adverse events higher than grade 3 in eligible experimental arms. (A): PFS of HER2+ for experimental arms. (B): PFS of HR+ and HER2+ for experimental arms. (C): OS of HER2+ for experimental arms. (D): ORR of HER2+ for experimental arms. (E): Adverse events higher than grade 3 of HER2+ for experimental arms. Figure 3. Each endpoint ranking for experimental arms. (SUCRA, surface under the cumulative ranking) (A): PFS ranking for experimental arms. (B): OS ranking for experimental arms. (C): ORR ranking for experimental arms. (D): Adverse events higher than grade 3 ranking for experimental arms. (E): Experimental arms ordered by their overall probability as the best treatment in terms of both efficacy and safety Citation Format: Junxiao Wang, Yushuai Yu, Jie Zhang, Chuangui Song. Efficacy and Safety of First-line Therapy in Patients with HER-2 positive Advanced Breast Cancer:A network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-04-07.

Abstract PO3-05-09: The impact of body mass index on CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment survival outcomes in metastatic breast cancer

Abstract Introduction: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) are important in the treatment of hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Previous studies have shown that CDK4/6is affect metabolic processes and cell metabolism, including adipogenesis, lipid synthesis, and glucose regulation. Obesity has been associated with worse survival in breast cancer. We aimed to assess the effect of body mass index (BMI) on survival outcomes in patients treated with CDK4/6is for MBC. Methods: Patients diagnosed with metastatic HR+/HER2-negative BC and who were treated with palbociclib, ribociclib, or abemaciclib from 6/10/2015 to 12/28/2022 were selected from the Montefiore Health system database and followed until 3/24/2023. The patients were divided into three groups according to BMI level as follows; normal: 18.5-24.9 kg/m2, overweight: 25-29.9 kg/m2 and obese: ≥ 30 kg/m2. Patients were also stratified by BMI measured after 3 months of therapy. Characteristics of the patients and tumors in the subgroups were compared using chi-squared/Fisher’s exact test for categorical data and Kruskal-Wallis/Wilcox signed rank tests for continuous data. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analysis were used to compare overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Results: Among 221 patients, 66 were normal weight, 78 were overweight, and 77 were obese. There was no statistically significant difference in clinicopathological characteristics among the cohorts. Neither BMI measured at baseline nor after 3 months of therapy had any association with OS (P = 0.8 at baseline and P = 0.1 after 3 months) or PFS (P = 0.4 at baseline and P = 0.6 after 3 months). Multivariable analysis showed no statistically significant association between BMI and worse OS (HR: 1.1 for overweight, P = 0.7; and 0.96 for obese, P = 0.9) or worse PFS (HR: 0.9 for overweight, P = 0.8; and 0.76 for obese, P = 0.5). Multivariate analysis revealed a significant effect of obese BMI after 3 months of treatment on OS (HR: 0.48, P = 0.035) but not on PFS (HR: 0.88, P = 0.8). Overweight BMI after 3 months of treatment was not found to have a significant effect on OS (HR: 0.49, P = 0.063) or PFS (HR: 0.89, P = 0.9). Conclusion: The clinical effectiveness of CDK4/6is was not found to be influenced by BMI measured prior to therapy; however, there may be an association between improved OS and obese BMI after 3 months of treatment. Median OS and PFS in patients with MBC comparing different BMI groups (normal, overweight, and obese) at baseline prior to therapy and after 3 months of therapy. Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients with MBC comparing different BMI groups (normal, overweight, and obese) at baseline prior to therapy and after 3 months of therapy. Table 2 Table 3 Multivariable analysis of OS and PFS for patients with MBC comparing different BMI groups (normal, overweight, and obese) at baseline prior to therapy and after 3 months of therapy. Citation Format: Frank Zhang, Jesus Anampa Mesias. The impact of body mass index on CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment survival outcomes in metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-05-09.

Abstract PO4-05-10: A Carryover Effect: Antibody Drug Conjugates Constantly Provide a Substantial Improvement in Overall Survival more than in Progression-free Survival

Abstract Background: In metastatic breast cancer (MBC), progression-free survival (PFS) improvement does not always translate into overall survival (OS) benefit. Multiple treatment options after progression resulted in a long post-progression survival in MBC patients, and these would make the dissociation of PFS benefit and OS benefit. We have reported the constant correlation of PFS improvement and OS improvement in anti-HER2 containing treatment (Breast 2021; 59:211-220). The relationship between PFS and OS improvement in antibody drug conjugate has not been thoroughly examined. Methods: “Metastatic breast cancer” and “antibody drug conjugate” (ADC) were used as keywords to search for randomized clinical trials that report both PFS and OS. Hazard ratios (HR) and median survival were analyzed. Increments in PFS (delta PFS) and increments in OS (delta OS) were compared between studies. Results: A total of 8 trials were identified and summarized in table 1. The target of ADC was HER2 (N=6) or Trop2 (N=2). In DESTINY-Breast 03 trial, the control arm was another ADC (T-DM1). The control arms in all the other 7 trials were chemotherapy. The HR of PFS (range 0.28-0.66) was smaller than HR of OS (range 0.48- 0.83) in all of the trials. The median OS was not reached (NR) in 1 of the trials (DB-03) and was thus removed from the analysis for delta PFS and delta OS. In the comparison of delta PFS, the increments of median PFS fell between 1.5 and 10.9 months(m). The increments of median OS were between 1.6 and 12.7 m. All the delta OS are greater than the delta PFS in the 7 trials with available PFS and OS data. Conclusion: In MBC, ADCs targeting HER2 and Trop2 both constantly provide improvement of OS greater than PFS. Further investigation on the potential mechanism is warranted. Table 1 Citation Format: I-Chun Chen, Ching-Hung Lin, Yen-Shen Lu. A Carryover Effect: Antibody Drug Conjugates Constantly Provide a Substantial Improvement in Overall Survival more than in Progression-free Survival [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-05-10.

Abstract PO5-04-11: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) beyond progression in hormone receptor positive advanced breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Introduction The use of CDK 4/6i (palbociclib/ribociclib/abemaciclib) with endocrine therapy (ET) is a widely adopted first line standard treatment for hormone receptor positive advanced breast cancer (HR+ABC). Data supporting incorporation of CDK 4/6i ± ET beyond progression are less clear. Recent studies have evaluated either the continuation of or switching to a different CDK 4/6i, with a change in ET after progression on 1st line CDK4/6i with varying results. A pooled analysis of this strategy could be useful for clinical decision making. Methods We reviewed reports of both observational and clinical studies that evaluated continuing the same CDK4/6i or switching to a different agent after progression on first line CDK4/6i with ET. The search included the grey literature without exclusions for publication year or language. The mean overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR) and progression free survival (PFS) weighted by study sample size were calculated. Meta-regression comprising linear regression weighted by sample size (mixed effects) was performed to explore the association between disease and treatment-related factors and benefit from continuing a CDK4/6i. Quantitative significance was assessed using the Burnand criteria. Analyses were performed using SPSS version 28 (IBM Corp, Armonk NY). Results Thirteen studies (N=1006 patients) were included; 7 were prospective trials and 2 cohorts of the same retrospective study included separately). Study patients had a median age of 57.8 years and 66% had visceral metastases. Among patients whose type of first-line CDK 4/6i exposure was reported (84.5%), 81.21% received Palbociclib 3.28% received Ribociclib and 0.89% received Abemaciclib. Six patients received both Palbociclib and Ribociclib. The median duration of first line CDK 4/6i therapy was 13.8 months. In the second line,the mean ORR was 12.8%, CBR 38.8%, and median PFS was 4.6 months. The ORRs for Palbociclib, Ribociclib and Abemaciclib, irrespective of type of prior CDK 4/6i, were 7.3%, 14.7% and 18.6%, respectively. The CBR for Palbociclib, Ribociclib and Abemaciclib were 33.1%, 42.2% and 46.8%, respectively. The median PFS based the CDK 4/6i used in second line was 4.2 (Palbociclib), 5.5 (Ribociclib) and 9.2 (Abemaciclib) months. Meta-regression analysis of PFS is included in the table. Conclusion Continuing a CDK 4/6i± ET beyond progression yields modest benefits. Switching CDK4/6i offers slightly better ORR and PFS. Continuing Palbociclib beyond progression does not seem beneficial. Longer duration of CDK4i exposure in the first line appears to be associated with shorter PFS in the second line. Small number of studies with limited number of patients likely affect results. Meta-regression analysis of PFS of CDK 4/6i with or without ET in subsequent line of therapy. Citation Format: Neha Pathak, Sudhir Kumar, Diego Malon Gimenez, Massimo Di Iorio, Consolacion Molto Valiente, Danielle Cuthbert, Meredith Li, Atul Batra, Michelle Nadler, Eitan Amir, Abhenil Mittal. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) beyond progression in hormone receptor positive advanced breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-04-11.

Abstract PO1-05-05: Overall survival (OS) and subsequent therapy patterns in Japanese patients with HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer (ABC) treated with palbociclib (PAL) plus letrozole (LET) in first-line setting (1L)

Abstract Background: PAL is a first-in-class cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) for the treatment of HR+/HER2− ABC. In PALOMA-2 study, PAL plus LET demonstrated a numerically, not statistically significant, prolonged OS versus placebo plus LET (53.9 vs 51.2 months; HR, 0.956; 95% CI, 0.777–1.177) in patients with HR+/HER2− ABC in 1L. Subgroup analyses showed a similar trend in Asia/Pacific region (73.4 vs 55.1 months; HR, 0.744), however, data specific to Japanese subgroup have not been reported. An open-label, single-arm, multicenter Japanese phase 2 study (J-Ph2) investigated the efficacy and safety of PAL plus LET in postmenopausal Japanese women with HR+/HER2− ABC in 1L and showed a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 35.7 months (95% CI, 21.7–46.7) in the final analysis of PFS. However, OS data were immature at the data cutoff. Here, we report the findings from a follow-up study of J-Ph2 (NCT04735367) evaluating OS and subsequent therapy in these Japanese patients. Methods: Patients (N=42) who participated in J-Ph2 were enrolled in this follow-up study. The primary endpoint was OS, defined as the time from the first dose of PAL plus LET in J-Ph2 to date of death due to any cause. Secondary endpoints included chemotherapy-free survival (CFS) and type and duration of subsequent therapy. Median OS, CFS, duration of subsequent therapy and associated 95% CIs were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Outcomes were also assessed for baseline demographic and disease characteristic subgroups including visceral or nonvisceral metastatic disease, disease-free interval (DFI; ≤12 months, >12 months, de novo metastatic), and duration of 1L PAL use (≤24 months or >24 months). Results: Patients had a median age of 62.5 years; 48% had visceral metastases; 33% had de novo disease; 48% had a TFI >12 months; 93% had an ECOG performance status (PS) of 0. At a median follow up of 89.7 months, the median OS was 85.4 months (95% CI, 64.3–not estimable [NE]). Median OS was longer in patients with nonvisceral versus visceral metastases (not reached [NR] vs 67.3 months), with TFI >12 months versus ≤12 months (85.4 vs 45.4 months), or with duration of 1L PAL use >24 months versus ≤24 months (NR vs 47.5 months). Median CFS was 69.1 months (95% CI, 24.2–85.4), and that was longer in patients with nonvisceral versus visceral metastases (77.5 vs 37.5 months). At the data cutoff, 3 patients (7.1%) were still receiving PAL plus LET (90.9–93.2 months). Subsequent therapy after disease progression was administered to 34 of 42 patients (81%). Of these patients, 28 (82%) received endocrine-based therapy, while 3 (9%) patients each received chemotherapy and other therapy, respectively. The median duration of the first subsequent therapy was 8.3 months (95% CI, 3.9–12.2), and that was similar among patients with nonvisceral versus visceral metastases (7.8 vs 8.3 months). Conclusion: This interim analysis showed a median OS of >7 years with 1L PAL plus LET. Patient demographics (geographic, racial factors), disease characteristics (ECOG PS, visceral metastases), and subsequent therapy decisions may have contributed to the extended median OS observed in this study. Further, this report provides insight into real-world subsequent treatment patterns following PAL plus ET. Table Citation Format: Masato Takahashi, Tomofumi Osako, Hiroyuki Yasojima, Kenichi Inoue, Masahiro Kawashima, Hideki Maeda, Mitsuya Ito, Yasuaki Sagara, Kan Yonemori, Masaya Hattori, Naohito Yamamoto, Eriko Tokunaga, Shozo Ohsumi, Yutaka Yamamoto, Akemi Ichikawa, Yasuaki Muramatsu, Norikazu Masuda. Overall survival (OS) and subsequent therapy patterns in Japanese patients with HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer (ABC) treated with palbociclib (PAL) plus letrozole (LET) in first-line setting (1L) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-05-05.

Abstract PS17-03: Capivasertib and fulvestrant for patients with aromatase inhibitor-resistant HR positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: exploratory analysis of PFS by AKT pathway gene from the Phase 3 CAPItello-291 trial

Abstract Background: In the Phase 3 randomized, double-blind CAPItello-291 trial, the addition of capivasertib (a potent, selective pan-AKT inhibitor) to fulvestrant in patients with aromatase inhibitor-resistant, hormone receptor (HR)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative (HER2− defined as immunohistochemistry [IHC] 0, or 1-positive or IHC2-positive/in situ hybridization-negative) advanced breast cancer (ABC) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo + fulvestrant (hazard ratio [HR] 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51–0.71; p< 0.001). PFS benefit was observed in patients with detectable AKT pathway alterations (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.38–0.65; p< 0.001) and without (0.70; 95% CI; 0.56–0.88). Here, we report PFS by gene within the AKT pathway-altered population. Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive fulvestrant (500 mg intramuscularly on days 1 and 15 of cycle 1, and day 1 of each subsequent 28-day cycle) with either placebo or capivasertib (400 mg twice daily; 4 days on, 3 days off). AKT pathway-alteration status (at least one qualifying alteration in the genes PIK3CA, AKT1, or PTEN) was determined post-randomization, using next-generation sequencing in tumor tissue. HRs were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models. Data cut-off Aug 15, 2022. Results: Of the 708 patients randomized to treatment, 289 (41%) had AKT pathway-altered tumors (capivasertib-fulvestrant n=155; placebo-fulvestrant n=134). In the AKT pathway-altered population, 43% had liver metastases and 40% primary endocrine therapy resistance. Prior therapy for advanced disease included: 89% of patients with ≥1 line of prior treatment, 71% with a prior cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor, and 18% with prior chemotherapy. Baseline characteristics were broadly balanced between treatment groups. Most patients with an AKT pathway-altered tumor had only one detectable alteration (272/289, 94%). Thirteen patients (capivasertib-fulvestrant n=4; placebo-fulvestrant n=9) had co-occurring PIK3CA and PTEN alterations, and four patients (capivasertib-fulvestrant n=2; placebo-fulvestrant n=2) had co-occurring PIK3CA and AKT1 alterations. Consistent PFS benefit of capivasertib-fulvestrant over placebo-fulvestrant was observed across all alterations (Table). The safety profile of capivasertib-fulvestrant in the AKT pathway-altered population was consistent with the overall population. Conclusions: Compared with fulvestrant alone, the addition of capivasertib to fulvestrant provided a consistent PFS benefit across alterations in all three key genes within the AKT pathway in patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative ABC. https://clinicaltrials.gov/: NCT04305496 Funding: CAPItello-291 is sponsored by AstraZeneca. Editorial acknowledgment: AstraZeneca-funded medical writing support was provided by Suzanne Patel, Ph.D., from BOLDSCIENCE Inc. Capivasertib was discovered by AstraZeneca subsequent to a collaboration with Astex Therapeutics (and its collaboration with the Institute of Cancer Research and Cancer Research Technology Limited). Table. Citation Format: Sacha Howell, Hope Rugo, Mafalda Oliveira, Florence Dalenc, Javier Cortés, Henry Gómez, Xichun Hu, Komal Jhaveri, Petr Krivorotko, Sibylle Loibl, Serafin Morales Murillo, Meena Okera, Yeon Park, Joo Hyuk Sohn, Masakazu Toi, Eriko Tokunaga, Lyudmila Zhukova, Andrew Lloyd, Elza de Bruin, Coumaran Egile, Celina D’Cruz, Nicholas Turner. Capivasertib and fulvestrant for patients with aromatase inhibitor-resistant HR positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: exploratory analysis of PFS by AKT pathway gene from the Phase 3 CAPItello-291 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PS17-03.

Abstract PO2-04-10: Effect of Alpelisib Dose Modification for AE Management on Progression-Free Survival and Treatment Duration in SOLAR-1 and BYLieve Clinical Trials

Abstract Background: Alpelisib (ALP) is an α-selective phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor and degrader approved with fulvestrant (FUL) for patients (pts) with phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA)-mutated, hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC) following progression on/after endocrine therapy-based treatment (tx). Toxicity limited ALP exposure in some pts in the SOLAR-1 and BYLieve studies. On-target effects of PI3K inhibitors, including hyperglycemia, rash, and diarrhea, are among the most common adverse events (AEs) associated with ALP. During SOLAR-1, median onset times were 15 and 13 days for grade ≥3 hyperglycemia and rash and 46 days for grade 2/3 diarrhea. ALP dose modification can help manage AEs. We report efficacy of ALP + FUL as second-line (2L) tx in pts who underwent ALP dose reduction (DR). Methods: Pts with PIK3CA mutations from SOLAR-1 and BYLieve, treated with ALP + FUL in 2L, were included. Landmark (LM) analyses were performed at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 mo after tx initiation to evaluate the association between DR status (yes, no) with progression-free survival (PFS) and duration of tx (DoT), respectively. Pts with PFS or exposure time less than each LM time point were excluded from each LM analysis; pts were then grouped by DR (yes, no) before each LM time point. Median PFS and DoT were obtained using a modified Kaplan-Meier method. Alternatively, Cox regression analysis was used to assess the effect of DR on PFS and DoT, where 2 time-dependent variables were included separately in the model as a covariate: 1) DR status, and 2) DR groups (300 to 250 mg [1 DR] vs no DR, 300 to 250 to 200 mg [2 DR] vs no DR). Association between AEs and DR was evaluated descriptively. A matched analysis of AEs will be presented. Results: In all, the analysis included 212 pts in 2L: 77 from SOLAR-1, and 95 and 40 from BYLieve Cohorts A and C, respectively. Of these pts, 92 (43.4%) had no DR and 120 (56.6%) had DRs: 70 (58.3%) had 1 DR, 43 (35.8%) had 2, and 7 (5.8%) had other types of DR. 25 of 92 pts (27.2%) with no DR and 40 of 120 pts (33.3%) with DR had ≥12-mo exposure to ALP. Hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS and DoT in DR status for the LM analysis are shown (Table). HRs (95% CI) for PFS from the time-dependent covariate analyses were 1.28 (0.94-1.74) with DR status as the covariate, and 1.24 (0.88-1.76) and 1.21 (0.79-1.84) with DR group (1 DR vs no DR, 2 DR vs no DR) as the covariate, respectively; for DoT, these were 1.34 (1.00-1.79) for DR status, and 1.30 (0.93-1.80) and 1.30 (0.87-1.93) for DR group, respectively. During the treatment period, the incidence rate for grade ≥3 AEs was the highest for pts with 2 DR and lowest for those with no DR. Similarly, incidence of AEs leading to DR or tx discontinuation was higher in pts with 2 DR than 1 DR. The post-DR incidence rate for grade ≥3 AE was similar for pts with 2 DR or 1 DR. A matched analysis will assess the relationship between DR group and AE. Conclusions: In this pooled analysis, regardless of if/when DR occurred, PFS was similar and DoT may be sustained with ALP + FUL. ALP DR can potentially reduce AEs, which may allow pts to remain on tx. Using DR as an AE management strategy may enable pts with PIK3CA-mutated, HR+, HER2− ABC to optimize tx duration and clinical benefit of ALP in the 2L. Landmark Analyses of PFS and Tx Duration by DR Group (Yes vs No; Pooled FAS) Citation Format: Hope Rugo, Alessandra Gennari, Stephen Chia, Dejan Juric, Neil Vasan, Sherko Küemmel, Patrick Neven, Florence Lerebours, Manuel Ruíz - Borrego, Pedram Razavi, Jyotika Singh, Yogesh Chattar, Murat Akdere, Eva Ciruelos. Effect of Alpelisib Dose Modification for AE Management on Progression-Free Survival and Treatment Duration in SOLAR-1 and BYLieve Clinical Trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-04-10.

The utility of inflammatory biomarkers in predicting overall survival and recurrence in skull base chordoma.

Numerous studies have investigated the impact of inflammatory factors in cancer, yet few attempts have been made to investigate these markers in skull base chordoma (SBC). Inflammatory values including neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR), systemic immune inflammation index (SII), and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) can serve as prognostic markers in various cancers. This study aimed to determine whether these inflammatory factors influence overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with primary SBC. The electronic medical records of patients with primary SBC who underwent resection from 2001 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed for the associations of sex, age at diagnosis, preoperative steroid use, tumor volume, extent of resection, adjuvant radiation after surgery, tumor metastasis, Ki-67 index, percent homozygous deletion of 9p23 and percent 1p36 loss, and potential prognostic inflammatory markers of NLR, PLR, LMR, SII, and SIRI with the primary outcome measures of OS and PFS. Maximum log-rank statistical tests were used to determine inflammatory marker thresholds for grouping prior to Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analysis for OS and PFS of the elucidated groups. The cohort included 115 primary SBC patients. The mean ± SD tumor volume was 23.0 ± 28.0 cm3, 73% of patients received gross-total resection, 40% received postoperative radiation, 25% had local recurrence, and 6% had subsequent metastatic disease (mean follow-up 47.2 months). Univariable Cox analysis revealed that NLR (p < 0.01), PLR (p = 0.04), LMR (p = 0.04), SII (p < 0.01), and SIRI (p < 0.01) were independently associated with PFS. Additionally, NLR (p = 0.05) and SII (p = 0.03) were significant in multivariable Cox analysis of PFS. However, both univariable and multivariable Cox analysis revealed no correlations with OS. The routine assessment of inflammatory biomarkers such as NLR and SIRI could have prognostic value in postresection SBC patients.

Durvalumab Plus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Versus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Biliary Tract Cancer: a Real-World Retrospective, Multicenter Study.

The TOPAZ-1 phase III trial reported a survival benefit with the anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) durvalumab in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). The present study investigated for the first time the impact on survival of adding durvalumab to cisplatin/gemcitabine compared with cisplatin/gemcitabine in a real-world setting. The analyzed population included patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic BTC treated with durvalumab in combination with cisplatin/gemcitabine or with cisplatin/gemcitabine alone. The impact of adding durvalumab to chemotherapy in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) was investigated with univariate and multivariate analysis. Overall, 563 patients were included in the analysis: 213 received cisplatin/gemcitabine alone, 350 received cisplatin/gemcitabine plus durvalumab. At the univariate analysis, the addition of durvalumab was found to have an impact on survival, with a median OS of 14.8 months versus 11.2 months [hazard ratio (HR) 0.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50-0.80, p = 0.0002] in patients who received cisplatin/gemcitabine plus durvalumab compared to those who received cisplatin/gemcitabine alone. At the univariate analysis for PFS, the addition of durvalumab to cisplatin/gemcitabine demonstrated a survival impact, with a median PFS of 8.3 months and 6.0 months (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.47-0.70, p < 0.0001) in patients who received cisplatin/gemcitabine plus durvalumab and cisplatin/gemcitabine alone, respectively. The multivariate analysis confirmed that adding durvalumab to cisplatin/gemcitabine is an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS, with patients > 70 years old and those affected by locally advanced disease experiencing the highest survival benefit. Finally, an exploratory analysis of prognostic factors was performed in the cohort of patients who received durvalumab: neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and disease stage were to be independent prognostic factors in terms of OS. The interaction test highlighted NLR ≤ 3, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) = 0, and locally advanced disease as positive predictive factors for OS on cisplatin/gemcitabine plus durvalumab. In line with the results of the TOPAZ-1 trial, adding durvalumab to cisplatin/gemcitabine has been confirmed to confer a survival benefit in terms of OS and PFS in a real-world setting of patients with advanced BTC.

Laser interstitial thermal therapy for recurrent glioblastomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

We aim to investigate the efficacy and safety of laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) in treating recurrent glioblastomas (rGBMs). A comprehensive search was conducted in four databases to identify studies published between January 2001 and June 2022 that reported prognosis information of rGBM patients treated with LITT as the primary therapy. The primary outcomes of interest were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 6 and 12 months after LITT intervention. Adverse events and complications were also evaluated. Eight eligible non-comparative studies comprising 128 patients were included in the analysis. Seven studies involving 120 patients provided data for the analysis of PFS. The pooled PFS rate at 6 months after LITT was 25% (95% CI 15-37%, I2 = 53%), and at 12 months, it was 9% (95% CI 4-15%, I2 = 24%). OS analysis was performed on 54 patients from six studies, with an OS rate of 92% (95% CI 84-100%, I2 = 0%) at 6 months and 42% (95% CI 13-73%, I2 = 67%) at 12 months after LITT. LITT demonstrates a favorable safety profile with low complication rates and promising tumor control and overall survival rates in patients with rGBMs. Tumor volume and performance status are important factors that may influence the effectiveness of LITT in selected patients. Additionally, the combination of LITT with immune-based therapy holds promise. Further well-designed clinical trials are needed to expand the application of LITT in glioma treatment.

Efficacy and safety of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for advanced metastatic thyroid cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been approved for treating patients with clinically advanced metastatic thyroid cancer. However among the many TKIs, it remains unknown which regimen is the best choice for these patients. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare the survival benefits and efficacy of the available first-line regimens. We conducted an active search for phase II, III, or IV randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases to compare the effects of at least 2 drugs in the systemic treatment of advanced or metastatic thyroid cancer up to May 2023. The network meta-analysis model was adjusted using Bayesian Network model. Twelve trials with 2535 patients were included in our meta-analysis. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and serious adverse events (SAEs) were taken as reference indicators. We also performed subgroup analyses of OS and PFS in medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) and radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RR-DTC) to explore the variations of TKIs in different groups. As a result, apatinib had the best effect on overall survival (OS) (hazards ratio [HR] = 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.18-0.98), lenvatinib 18 mg/d has the best effect on progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.13, 95% CI = 0.064-0.27), and cabozantinib 60 mg/d has the best safety profile. Our network meta-analysis showed that we believe that cabozantinib has the potential to become a widely used drug in clinical practice.

Long-term outcomes after haploidentical stem cell transplantation for hematologic malignancies

AbstractThe introduction of posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)–based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis lead to significant improvements in haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT) outcomes over the past decade. We retrospectively assessed long-term outcomes of patients who had their first haplo-SCT between February 2009 and March 2019. Long-term survivors were defined as patients who were alive and disease-free at 2 years after transplant. Three hundred thirty-five patients with a median age of 48 years (range, 18-72) were identified. Of these, 142 patients were disease-free and alive at 2 years after transplant. The 4-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for all study patients were 42% and 47%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 52 months for the long-term survivor group, the 4-year PFS and OS were 94% and 96%, respectively. The 4-year cumulative incidence of relapse and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were 2.9% and 3.3%, respectively. Age ≥55 years was the only predictive factor in multivariate analysis for inferior PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 3.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-9.60; P = .020) and OS (HR, 3.31; 95% CI, 1.08-10.18; P = .037). Thirteen patients (9%) died in the long-term survivor group, only 2 of whom died of relapsed disease. Secondary primary malignancy was the most frequent cause of NRM (n = 4), followed by infection (n = 2). For haplo-SCT with PTCy–based GVHD prophylaxis, our findings suggest an excellent long-term survival for patients who were disease-free and alive at 2 years after transplant. Late relapses were rare, and age was the only predictive factor for long-term outcomes.

Abstract 2515: Cation transport gene signature predicts overall and progression free survival in bacillus-calmette-guerrin-treated non-muscle invasive bladder cancer in The Cancer Genome Atlas

Abstract Introduction: Bacillus Calmette-Guerrin (BCG) is a commonly used immunotherapy for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), and there is limited understanding of its in vivo mechanisms. In vitro studies on patient-derived tumor cells suggest the role of calcium signaling as an effector of immune response. We aimed to elucidate further understanding of important signaling pathways implicated in BCG response using gene expression data. The goal is to identify a gene signature for predicting BCG response and survival post-BCG therapy. Methods: Gene expression data for the BCG treated NMIBC cohort was downloaded from TCGA. Individual gene expression data analyzed with univariate cox proportional hazard models versus overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) independently. The survival outputs were then fed into String DB network analysis. Overlapping genes in the 2 networks were combined into a Z- sum composite score for survival prediction. Correlation analysis was performed for the overlapping genes. Results: Based on the selection criteria, 35 patients were available for the study. In OS analysis a total of 622 genes were filtered based on HR&amp;gt;2 or &amp;lt;0.5 with adjusted-p &amp;lt;0.05. Network analysis of those significant genes demonstrated significant calcium ion transmembrane transport upregulation in patients with better OS, showing a subnetwork of 16 genes. In the PFS analysis, 500 genes with HR&amp;gt;2 or &amp;lt;0.5 with adjusted-p&amp;lt;0.05 were subjected to network analysis. The main cluster was enriched in cation transmembrane transport upregulated in patients with better PFS, and consisted of a subnetwork of 39 genes. There were 295 shared genes between the genes associated with improved OS and PFS gene sets. A composite score constructed from these 295 genes revealed an optimized cutoff of the lower 70th percentile of expression versus the upper 30th percentile of normalized summed gene expression (HR = 0.192, p = 0.00048 for OS; and HR = 0.171, p &amp;lt; 0.0001 for PFS). Internal correlation reveals 3 sub-clusters of gene expression within our data set. Conclusion: Similar to in vitro studies we report increased cation transport expression in vivo, that was significantly associated with improved OS after BCG immunotherapy. Our composite gene signature score was able to identify a poor survival subgroup—about 1/3 of patients—with 5-fold worse PFS and OS following BCG therapy. Increasing calcium signaling may potentiate BCG response in currently poor BCG-responders. Citation Format: Lynn Kim Hoang Tran, Seth P. Lerner. Cation transport gene signature predicts overall and progression free survival in bacillus-calmette-guerrin-treated non-muscle invasive bladder cancer in The Cancer Genome Atlas [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 2515.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Standard and Biweekly Trifluridine/Tipiracil Regimen in Patients With Colorectal Cancer.

Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) is used to treat metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Since the standard regimen of FTD/TPI features a complex dosing schedule and frequently results in severe hematological toxicities, a simplified regimen has emerged, in which FTD/TPI is orally administered biweekly. However, the survival benefits and potential adverse events associated with the biweekly FTD/TPI regimen have not been fully evaluated in previous reports. Therefore, in this study, the differences in efficacy and safety between the standard and biweekly FTD/TPI regimens were retrospectively investigated in patients with mCRC. Data from 90 patients who received FTD/TPI for mCRC were extracted from the electronic medical records at the Osaka University Hospital. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 85 of the 90 patients were enrolled in the study. We compared patient characteristics, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events between the standard (n=56) and biweekly groups (n=29). The biweekly group exhibited prolonged OS and PFS compared to patients in the standard group. Multivariate analysis for OS and PFS demonstrated that the biweekly regimen was the only significant factor that affected OS, and not PFS (HR=0.561, p=0.049). Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that neutropenia (grade ≥3) in the biweekly group was significantly prolonged compared to the standard group (p=0.012). However, there were no significant differences in adverse events between the two groups (p>0.999). The biweekly FTD/TPI regimen, compared to the standard regimen, should enhance both OS and PFS in patients with mCRC without escalating any adverse event.

Selective Internal Radiation Therapy Using Y-90 Resin Microspheres for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: An Updated Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

This literature review and exploratory network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness and tolerability of selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) using yttrium-90 (Y-90) resin microspheres, regorafenib (REG), trifluridine-tipiracil (TFD/TPI), and best supportive care (BSC) in adult patients with chemotherapy-refractory or chemotherapy-intolerant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In light of recently published data, the literature was searched to complement and update a review published in 2018. Studies up to December 2022 comparing two or more of the treatments and reporting overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), or incidence of adverse events (AE) were included. The NMA compared hazard ratios (HRs) for OS and PFS using Markov chain Monte Carlo techniques. Fifteen studies were included, with eight studies added (none addressing SIRT). All active treatments improved OS in relation to BSC. SIRT had the longest OS among all treatments, although without statistically significant differences (HR [95% credible interval] for SIRT, 0.48 [0.27, 0.87]; TFD/TPI, 0.62 [0.46, 0.83]; REG, 0.78 [0.57, 1.05]) in a fixed effects model. Information regarding SIRT was insufficient for PFS analysis, and TFD/TPI was the best intervention (HR 2.26 [1.6, 3.18]). One SIRT study reported radioembolization-induced liver disease in > 10% of the sample; this was symptomatically managed. Non-haematological AEs (hand-foot skin reaction, fatigue, diarrhoea, hypertension, rash or desquamation) were more common with REG, while haematological events (neutropoenia, leukopenia, and anaemia) were more common with TFD/TPI. Current evidence supports SIRT treatment in patients with chemotherapy-refractory or chemotherapy-intolerant mCRC compared to newer oral agents, with comparable OS and low incidence of AEs.

CT-guided High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy versus Transarterial Chemoembolization in Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Background CT-guided high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (hereafter, HDR brachytherapy) has been shown to be safe and effective for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but studies comparing this therapy with other local-regional therapies are scarce. Purpose To compare patient outcomes of HDR brachytherapy and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with unresectable HCC. Materials and Methods This multi-institutional retrospective study included consecutive treatment-naive adult patients with unresectable HCC who underwent either HDR brachytherapy or TACE between January 2010 and December 2022. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between patients matched for clinical and tumor characteristics by propensity score matching. Not all patients who underwent TACE had PFS available; thus, a different set of patients was used for PFS and OS analysis for this treatment. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated from Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Results After propensity matching, 150 patients who underwent HDR brachytherapy (median age, 71 years [IQR, 63-77 years]; 117 males) and 150 patients who underwent TACE (OS analysis median age, 70 years [IQR, 63-77 years]; 119 male; PFS analysis median age, 68 years [IQR: 63-76 years]; 119 male) were analyzed. Hazard of death was higher in the TACE versus HDR brachytherapy group (HR, 4.04; P < .001). Median estimated PFS was 32.8 months (95% CI: 12.5, 58.7) in the HDR brachytherapy group and 11.6 months (95% CI: 4.9, 22.7) in the TACE group. Hazard of disease progression was higher in the TACE versus HDR brachytherapy group (HR, 2.23; P < .001). Conclusion In selected treatment-naive patients with unresectable HCC, treatment with CT-guided HDR brachytherapy led to improved OS and PFS compared with TACE. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Chapiro in this issue.

Six-year follow-up and subgroup analyses of a phase 2 trial of venetoclax for del(17p) chronic lymphocytic leukemia

AbstractChromosome 17p deletion (del[17p]) is associated with poor prognosis in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Venetoclax is approved for treatment of previously untreated and relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL, including patients with del(17p), based on the open-label, multicenter, phase 2 M13-982 trial (NCT01889186). Here, we detail the 6-year follow-up analysis for M13-982. A total of 158 patients with previously untreated (n = 5) or R/R (n = 153) del(17p) CLL received 400 mg venetoclax daily after initial ramp-up until progressive disease. After a median follow-up of 70 months, the best objective response rate (ORR) was 77% (21% complete remission [CR] and 49% partial remission [PR]), with a median duration of response (DOR) of 39.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 31.1-50.5). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 28.2 months (95% CI, 23.4-37.6), and median overall survival (OS) was 62.5 months (95% CI, 51.7-not reached), with 16% of patients remaining on treatment after 6 years. Multivariable analysis did not identify statistically significant correlation between patient subgroups defined by clinical or laboratory variables and ORR or PFS. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia (42%), infections (33%), anemia (16%), and thrombocytopenia (16%). Post hoc comparative analyses of PFS and OS from treatment initiation, from a 24-month landmark, and by minimal residual disease status were performed between patients with del(17p) in the M13-982 and MURANO studies in the interest of understanding these data in another context. These long-term data show the continued benefits of venetoclax in patients with del(17p) CLL. The trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01889186.

Impact of timing of immunotherapy and cytoreductive nephrectomy on outcomes in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Results from the CKCis database.

416 Background: Immunotherapy-based systemic treatment (ST) is the standard of care for most patients diagnosed with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) has historically shown benefit for select patients with mRCC but its role and timing are not well-understood in the era of immunotherapy. The primary objective of this study is to assess patient outcomes in patients who received ST only, CN followed by ST (CN-ST) and ST followed by CN (ST-CN). Methods: The Canadian Kidney Cancer information system (CKCis) database was queried to identify patients with de novo mRCC who received immunotherapy-based ST for mRCC between January 2014 to June 2023. These patients were classified into three categories as described above. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the impact of the timing of ST and CN on overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS), after adjusting for IMDC risk group. Complications of ST and CN for these cohorts were collected. Results: A total of 588 patients were included in this study. 331 patients received ST only, 215 patients received CN-ST and 42 patients received at least one dose of ST prior to CN. Patient and disease characteristics including age, gender, performance status, IMDC risk category, comorbidity, histology, type of ST and metastatic sites are reported and globally well-balanced. OS analysis favoured patients who received ST-CN (hazard ratio [HR] 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13-0.68) and CN-ST (HR 0.68, CI 0.47-0.97) over patients who received ST only. PFS analysis showed a similar trend for ST-CN (HR 0.45, CI 0.26-0.77) and CN-ST (HR 0.9, CI 0.68-1.17). The most common cause of ST delay or cessation was treatment toxicity, followed by progression of disease. The most common perioperative complication was bleeding, followed by infection. Conclusions: This study examined baseline features and outcomes associated with the use and timing of CN and ST using real world data through the CKCis database. Patients selected to receive CN after ST seem to have improved outcomes. There were no appreciable differences in ST toxicity or perioperative complications across groups. Limitations include the small number of patients in the CN-ST group and residual confounding and selection bias that may influence the outcomes in patients undergoing CN.