Interim Analysis Of Data Research Articles

Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab as an adjuvant treatment of renal cell carcinoma post-nephrectomy in Switzerland

Aims Pembrolizumab has demonstrated significantly prolonged disease-free survival and overall survival (OS) among adult patients post-nephrectomy who have an intermediate-high risk, high-risk, or M1 stage with no evidence of disease (M1 NED) renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with clear cell component. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab for patients with RCC post-nephrectomy versus observation in Switzerland. Materials and methods A previously published Markov model was adapted for the Swiss setting to estimate the cost-effectiveness of adjuvant pembrolizumab versus observation from the Swiss statutory health insurance perspective. Transition probabilities between model states were estimated using survival curves from KEYNOTE-564 (data cut-off: June 14, 2021). Outcomes included costs (2022 Swiss francs [CHF]), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and life-years (LYs), measured over a lifetime horizon. Costs included drug acquisition and administration for adjuvant and subsequent therapy. Both costs and effectiveness were discounted at 3.0% annually. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated at a hypothetical willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of CHF 100,000 Sensitivity was assessed through scenario analyses as well as deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Results Over a lifetime horizon, the total incremental cost for pembrolizumab versus observation was CHF 59,089, providing incremental gains of 0.90 QALYs (1.07 LYs); the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was CHF 65,299/QALY. Pembrolizumab was deemed cost-effective versus observation, with a 69.9% probability of cost-effectiveness. Limitations A more recent interim analysis data cut from KEYNOTE-564 with median follow up of 57.2 months has since been published; however, these were not available at the time of analysis. It would likely have minimal impact on transition probabilities from disease-free, and the current approach remains conservative for predicting OS for pembrolizumab. Conclusions As an adjuvant treatment of RCC post-nephrectomy, pembrolizumab was found to be cost-effective versus observation in Switzerland at a WTP threshold of CHF 100,000/QALY. Policy makers should consider pembrolizumab as an adjuvant treatment for patients with RCC post-nephrectomy when making decisions regarding resource allocation.

ENGOT-en11/GOG-3053/KEYNOTE-B21: a randomised, double-blind, phase III study of pembrolizumab or placebo plus adjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk endometrial cancer

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy provides clinically meaningful benefit as first-line therapy for advanced (locoregional extension and residual disease after surgery)/metastatic/recurrent mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) and mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) endometrial cancer, with greater magnitude of benefit in the dMMR phenotype. We evaluated the addition of pembrolizumab to adjuvant chemotherapy (with/without radiation therapy) among patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk endometrial cancer without any residual macroscopic disease following curative-intent surgery. We included patients with histologically confirmed high-risk [International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I/II of non-endometrioid histology or endometrioid histology with p53/TP53 abnormality, or stage III/IVA of any histology] endometrial cancer following surgery with curative intent and no evidence of disease postoperatively, with no prior radiotherapy or systemic therapy. Patients were randomised to pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo every 3 weeks (Q3W) for six cycles added to carboplatin-paclitaxel followed by pembrolizumab 400 mg or placebo every 6 weeks (Q6W) for six cycles per treatment assignment. Radiotherapy was at the investigator's discretion. The primary endpoints were investigator-assessed disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. A total of 1095 patients were randomised (pembrolizumab, n= 545; placebo, n= 550). At this interim analysis (data cut-off, 4 March 2024), 119 (22%) DFS events occurred in the pembrolizumab group and 121 (22%) occurred in the placebo group [hazard ratio 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79-1.32; P= 0.570]. Kaplan-Meier estimates of 2-year DFS rates were 75% and 76% in the pembrolizumab and placebo groups, respectively. The hazard ratio for DFS was 0.31 (95% CI 0.14-0.69) in the dMMR population (n= 281) and 1.20 (95% CI 0.91-1.57) in the pMMR population (n= 814). Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 386 of 543 (71%) and 348 of 549 (63%) patients in the pembrolizumab and placebo groups, respectively. No treatment-related grade 5 AEs occurred. Adjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy did not improve DFS in patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk, all-comer endometrial cancer. Preplanned subgroup analyses for stratification factors suggest that pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy improved DFS in patients with dMMR tumours. Safety was manageable. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04634877; EudraCT, 2020-003424-17. Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.

Pembrolizumab or placebo with chemoradiotherapy followed by pembrolizumab or placebo for newly diagnosed, high-risk, locally advanced cervical cancer (ENGOT-cx11/GOG-3047/KEYNOTE-A18): overall survival results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

At the first interim analysis of the phase 3 ENGOT-cx11/GOG-3047/KEYNOTE-A18 study, the addition of pembrolizumab to chemoradiotherapy provided a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in progression-free survival in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. We report the overall survival results from the second interim analysis of this study. Eligible patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk (FIGO 2014 stage IB2-IIB with node-positive disease or stage III-IVA regardless of nodal status), locally advanced, histologically confirmed, squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous cervical cancer were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive five cycles of pembrolizumab (200 mg) or placebo every 3 weeks with concurrent chemoradiotherapy, followed by 15 cycles of pembrolizumab (400 mg) or placebo every 6 weeks. Pembrolizumab or placebo and cisplatin were administered intravenously. Patients were stratified at randomisation by planned external beam radiotherapy type (intensity-modulated radiotherapy [IMRT] or volumetric-modulated arc therapy [VMAT] vs non-IMRT or non-VMAT), cervical cancer stage at screening (FIGO 2014 stage IB2-IIB node positive vs III-IVA), and planned total radiotherapy (external beam radiotherapy plus brachytherapy) dose (<70 Gy vs ≥70 Gy [equivalent dose of 2 Gy]). Primary endpoints were progression-free survival per RECIST 1.1 by investigator or by histopathological confirmation of suspected disease progression and overall survival defined as the time from randomisation to death due to any cause. Safety was a secondary endpoint. Between June 9, 2020, and Dec 15, 2022, 1060 patients at 176 sites in 30 countries across Asia, Australia, Europe, North America, and South America were randomly assigned to treatment, with 529 patients in the pembrolizumab-chemoradiotherapy group and 531 patients in the placebo-chemoradiotherapy group. At the protocol-specified second interim analysis (data cutoff Jan 8, 2024), median follow-up was 29·9 months (IQR 23·3-34·3). Median overall survival was not reached in either group; 36-month overall survival was 82·6% (95% CI 78·4-86·1) in the pembrolizumab-chemoradiotherapy group and 74·8% (70·1-78·8) in the placebo-chemoradiotherapy group. The hazard ratio for death was 0·67 (95% CI 0·50-0·90; p=0·0040), meeting the protocol-specified primary objective. 413 (78%) of 528 patients in the pembrolizumab-chemoradiotherapy group and 371 (70%) of 530 in the placebo-chemoradiotherapy group had a grade 3 or higher adverse event, with anaemia, white blood cell count decreased, and neutrophil count decreased being the most common adverse events. Potentially immune-mediated adverse events occurred in 206 (39%) of 528 patients in the pembrolizumab-chemoradiotherapy group and 90 (17%) of 530 patients in the placebo-chemoradiotherapy group. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04221945. Pembrolizumab plus chemoradiotherapy significantly improved overall survival in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer These data, together with results from the first interim analysis, support this immuno-chemoradiotherapy strategy as a new standard of care for this population. Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co.

Ixazomib as consolidation and maintenance versus observation in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma eligible for salvage autologous stem-cell transplantation (Myeloma XII [ACCoRD]): interim analysis of a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial

The efficacy of consolidation and maintenance in the context of salvage autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) for relapsed multiple myeloma remains unclear. We aimed to assess whether consolidation after salvage autologous HSCT, using ixazomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone, followed by maintenance with single agent ixazomib is superior to observation. This is an interim analysis of Myeloma XII (ACCorD; referred to as ACCorD hereafter), an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial done at 79 hospitals in the UK. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had relapsed multiple myeloma with measurable disease, an ECOG performance status of 2 or less with adequate renal, hepatobiliary, pulmonary, and cardiac function, and required treatment for first progressive disease occurring at least 12 months after first autologous HSCT. In a first randomisation, patients were assigned (1:1) to receive either conventional autologous HSCT with melphalan or augmented autologous HSCT with melphalan and ixazomib. In the second randomisation, reported here, patients were assigned (1:1) to consolidation using ixazomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (oral ixazomib 4 mg per day on days 1, 8, and 15, oral thalidomide 100 mg per day on days 1-28, and oral dexamethasone 40 mg per day on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of 28-day cycles), followed by maintenance with single agent ixazomib (oral ixazomib 4 mg per day on days 1, 8, and 15 of 28-day cycles until disease progression or intolerance), or observation. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, analysed by intention-to-treat. Safety was analysed per-protocol. This study is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN10038996, and EudraCT, 2016-000905-35, and recruitment is complete. Between Dec 12, 2017, and April 21, 2023, 206 patients entered the second randomisation (103 in the consolidation and maintenance group and 103 in the observation group). This prespecified interim analysis (data cutoff April 21, 2023), was done at a median follow-up of 27 months (IQR 13-38). Median progression-free survival was 20 months (95% CI 15-29) in the consolidation and maintenance group and 13 months (11-18) in the observation group (hazard ratio 0·55 [95% CI 0·39-0·78]; p=0·0006). Serious adverse events were reported in 29 (32%) of 92 patients in the consolidation and maintenance group compared with seven (7%) of 103 patients in the observation group. The most common serious adverse events were infections and infestations in both the consolidation and maintenance group and the observation group. The most common grade 3, 4, or 5 adverse events for patients in the consolidation and maintenance group were upper respiratory infection (seven [8%] of 92 patients). No deaths in the consolidation and maintenance group were deemed treatment related. ACCorD provides evidence that an orally administered, deliverable, and tolerable post-salvage autologous HSCT treatment regimen can improve the durability of response for transplantation-eligible patients at first relapse. The findings are of relevance to patients who had durable disease control from autologous HSCT in the first line, representing a viable alternative to continuous parentally-administered relapse therapies. Cancer Research UK, Takeda Oncology.

From Plan to Pivot: How Model-Informed Drug Development Shaped the Dose Strategy of the Zibotentan/Dapagliflozin ZENITH Trials.

Getting the dose right is a key challenge in drug development; model-informed drug development (MIDD) provides powerful tools to shape dose strategies and inform decision making. In this tutorial, the case study of the ZENITH trials showcases how a set of clinical pharmacology and MIDD approaches informed an impactful dose strategy. The endothelin A receptor antagonist zibotentan, combined with the sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor dapagliflozin, has yielded a robust and significant albuminuria reduction in the Phase IIb trial ZENITH-CKD and is being investigated for reduction of kidney function decline in a high-risk chronic kidney disease population in the Phase III trial ZENITH High Proteinuria. Endothelin antagonist treatment has, until now, been limited by the class effect fluid retention. ZENITH-CKD investigated a wide range of zibotentan doses based on pharmacokinetics in renal impairment, competitor-data exposure-response modeling, and clinical trial simulations. Recruitment delays reduced interim analysis data availability; here, supportive dose-response modeling recovered decision-making confidence. At trial completion, the low-dose arm enabled Phase III dose selection between Phase IIb doses. Dose-response modeling of efficacy and Kaplan-Meier analyses of tolerability identified a kidney-function-based low-dose strategy of 0.25 or 0.75 mg zibotentan (with 10 mg dapagliflozin) to balance benefit/risk in ZENITH High Proteinuria. The applied clinical pharmacology and MIDD principles enabled successful Phase IIb dose finding, rationalized and built confidence in the innovative Phase III dosing strategy and identified a potential therapeutic window for zibotentan/dapagliflozin, providing the opportunity for a significant improvement in the treatment of chronic kidney disease with high proteinuria.

Differences in Self-Rated Worker Outcomes Across Stress States: An Interim Analysis of Hybrid Worker Data

Stress experiences can have dire consequences for worker performance and well-being, and the social environment of the workplace is a key contributor to worker experience. This study investigated the relationship between hybrid workers’ self-ratings of productivity, mood, and stress with perceptions of positive (eustress) and negative (distress) stress states. We hypothesized that self-ratings would vary across combinations of eustress and distress experiences and that these differences would differ based on the social context. Ecological momentary assessments (EMA) were used to obtain ecologically valid data at four data points each workday across a 4-month study period in a cohort of seven office workers. Findings aligned with the Yerkes–Dodson law, such that higher states of arousal were associated with greater self-perceived productivity, and higher stress magnitudes were found when distress existed. Compared to other states, eustress was associated with higher productivity in work-related activities and better mood across all activity types.

AB048. Evidence of effectiveness of neoadjuvant camrelizumab and apatinib in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas.

Recurrent high-grade glioma (HGG) is a challenge with limited treatment options and a poor prognosis. We conducted an open-label phase II study: neoadjuvant camrelizumab and apatinib in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas (NCT04588987), and interim analysis showed very promising results. We are further searching for evidence of the effectiveness of this strategy. Patients with recurrent HGG received neoadjuvant treatment with camrelizumab (intravenous injection 200 mg on day 1) and apatinib (oral 250 mg per day on days 1-7), and 14 days later received surgery for recurrent tumor resection. Sequential therapy began 2 weeks after surgery with the biweekly camrelizumab (200 mg) and 4 weeks after surgery with the daily apatinib (250 mg) until investigator assessed progressive disease or unable to tolerate toxicity. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). When patients suspected progress during per-protocol treatment, re-surgery for resection of lesion was done, and the tissue was further examined. Between October 9, 2020, and March 30, 2024, 24 patients were enrolled [19 glioblastomas, one World Health Organization (WHO) grade 4 diffuse astrocytoma, three anaplastic astrocytoma, and one anaplastic oligodendroglioma]. Nineteen patients with interim analysis data, and showed the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.4-5.2], the median OS was 12.9 months (95% CI: 9.3-16.4) respectively, with a median follow-up time of 17.5 months (95% CI: 9.0-26.1). There were two patients who suspected progress and received second surgery. One patient showed real tumor progression with active tumor cells. While another patient the histology revealed mainly necrosis with inflammatory cells. Five patients initially showed increased enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) but without increased symptoms, and showed continuous improvement when receiving further treatment. This immuno-target combination neoadjuvant therapy in recurrent HGG demonstrated encouraging efficacy and revealed some evidence of efficacy, and worth to further investigate.

Interim results of neoadjuvant immunotherapy with prolgolimab in patients with locally advanced MSI / dMMR colorectal cancer

Introduction: Colorectal cancer is one of the leading malignancies in Russia [1]. The standard approach for selected patients (pts) with locally advanced colon cancer is surgery with adjuvant chemotherapy. Several studies have shown that colorectal cancer (CRC) with presence of a disorder in the mismatch repair (dMMR) / microsatellite instability (MSI) is characterized with high sensitivity to the immune checkpoint inhibitors. Several studies have shown that MSI / dMMR CRC patients tend to be more responsive to immune checkpoint inhibitors such as pembrolizumab, nivolumab or ipilimumab. However, there was no information about the efficacy of prolgolimab, a PD-1 receptor blocking antibody. Prolgolimab was highly effective in melanoma treatment, while the toxicity was comparable to pembrolizumab and nivolumab. Methods: We initiated the phase II non-randomized open-label clinical trial. Inclusion criteria were: histologically verified, MSI / dMMR, clinical stage II–III CRC. According to study protocol, prolgolimab (1 mg / kg) is administered every two weeks, then surgery should be done after 6 months of immunotherapy (12 cycles). In case of surgical treatment refusal, the systemic treatment proceeds for 1 year. The co-primary endpoint was the complete response (pCR) rate. Secondary endpoints included tumor regression grade by Mandard (TRG), major pathologic response (MPR), overall response rate (ORR) disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Here is a presentation of safety and pathologic response data — rates of pCR / MPR, objective response rate. Results: A total of 26 patients began treatment with prolgolimab from April, 2022 to February, 2024. Immune-related adverse effects of grade III–IV, were recorded in 1 (3,8 %) patient (autoimmune hepatitis grade IV); 4 (15,4 %) patients had adverse effects grade I–II: autoimmune thyroiditis, diarrhea, hypothyroidism. Two patients were refused to make a surgical treatment because of clinical CR and possible volume of surgery. Nine (34,6 %) patients underwent surgical treatment within 3 months after the immunotherapy completion: 7 patients had TRG 1 and pCR, 2 — TRG 2 and MPR after the treatment. ORR was 100 %, complete clinical response rate 40 %. The study is still ongoing, DFS and OS will be announced in further publications. Median follow-up time was 5 months. Conclusion: The first interim analysis data suggest a strong potential for neoadjuvant immunotherapy to become standard of care and allow further exploration of organ-sparing approaches in MMR / MSI CRC patients.

Nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 versus nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a multicenter, randomized, phase II study.

Encouraging antitumor activity of nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 (AS) has been shown in several small-scale studies. This study compared the efficacy and safety of AS versus standard-of-care nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (AG) as a first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer (PC). In this multicenter, randomized, phase II trial, eligible patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic PC were recruited and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive AS (nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8; S-1 twice daily on days 1 through 14) or AG (nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8; gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8) for 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Between July 16, 2019, and September 9, 2022, 62 patients (AS, n = 32; AG, n = 30) were treated and evaluated. With a median follow-up of 8.36 months at preplanned interim analysis (data cutoff, March 24, 2023), the median PFS (8.48 vs 4.47 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.402; P = .002) and overall survival (OS; 13.73 vs 9.59 months; HR, 0.226; P < .001) in the AS group were significantly longer compared to the AG group. More patients had objective response in the AS group than AG group (37.50% vs 6.67%; P = .005). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia and leucopenia in both groups, and gamma glutamyl transferase increase was observed only in the AG group. The first-line AS regimen significantly extended both PFS and OS of Chinese patients with advanced PC when compared with the AG regimen, with a comparable safety profile. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03636308).

Safety and efficacy of tofacitinib for the treatment of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: preliminary results of an open-label, long-term extension study

ObjectivesWe report the safety, tolerability and efficacy of tofacitinib in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) in an ongoing long-term extension (LTE) study.MethodsPatients (2–<18 years) with JIA who completed phase...

Interim analysis of clinical data and reasons for initiating relugolix on a cohort of US patients: The OPTYX study.

Interim analysis of clinical data and reasons for initiating relugolix on a cohort of US patients: The OPTYX study.

Sacituzumab tirumotecan (SKB264/MK-2870) in patients (pts) with previously treated locally recurrent or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC): Results from the phase III OptiTROP-Breast01 study.

104 Background: TROP2 (trophoblast cell surface antigen 2) is highly expressed in TNBC and is associated with worse survival. Sacituzumab tirumotecan (SKB264/MK-2870) is a TROP2 ADC developed with a novel linker to conjugate the payload, a belotecan-derivative topoisomerase I inhibitor with a drug-to-antibody-ratio (DAR) of 7.4. The hydrolytically linker permits both extracellular pH-sensitive cleavage and intracellular enzymatic cleavage to release the membrane permeable payload enabling the “bystander effect”. Here, we report the results from a phase Ⅲ study of sacituzumab tirumotecan in pts with advanced TNBC (OptiTROP-Breast01, NCT05347134). Methods: In this randomized phase Ⅲ trial, SKB264 was compared with physician's choice of chemotherapy (eribulin, vinorelbine, capecitabine, or gemcitabine) in pts with locally recurrent or metastatic TNBC who had received two or more prior therapies including at least one for metastatic setting. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR). The TROP2 expression was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using the semi-quantitative H-score method. Results: Pts were randomly assigned to receive SKB264 (n = 130) or chemotherapy (n = 133). The median age was 51 years; 87% had visceral metastases; 26% received prior PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors; 48% received three or more prior lines of chemotherapy for advanced disease. The primary endpoint of PFS was met based on interim analysis (data cutoff: Jun 21, 2023) with a 69% reduction in risk of progression or death (HR 0.31; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.45; P &lt;0.00001). The median PFS assessed by BICR was 5.7 months (95% CI, 4.3 to 7.2) with SKB264 and 2.3 months (95% CI, 1.6 to 2.7) with chemotherapy; PFS at 6 months was 43.4% vs 11.1%. In the subset of pts with TROP2 H-score &gt; 200, the median PFS was 5.8 months with SKB264 and 1.9 months with chemotherapy (HR 0.28; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.48). At the first planned interim analysis for overall survival (OS) (data cutoff: Nov 30, 2023) with median follow-up of 10.4 months, OS was statistically significant in favor of SKB264 (HR 0.53; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.78; P =0.0005); the median OS was not reached (95% CI, 11.2 to NE) with SKB264 and 9.4 months (95% CI, 8.5 to 11.7) with chemotherapy. The objective response rate assessed by BICR was 43.8% with SKB264 and 12.8% with chemotherapy. Most common grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (SKB264 vs chemotherapy) were neutrophil count decreased (32.3% vs 47.0%), anemia (27.7% vs 6.1%) and white blood cell count decreased (25.4% vs 36.4%). Conclusions: Sacituzumab tirumotecan monotherapy demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful PFS and OS benefit over chemotherapy, with a manageable safety profile in pts with heavily pretreated advanced TNBC and limited treatment options. Clinical trial information: NCT05347134 .

Exposure-response (ER) analyses of efficacy and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) to inform dosing recommendation in HER2-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

e20545 Background: T-DXd, a novel human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) targeting antibody drug conjugate, was evaluated at doses of 5.4 and 6.4 mg/kg every three weeks in Phase 1 or 2 trials in HER2 mutant (HER2m) NSCLC subjects, including Destiny-Lung01 (DL-01) and DL-02 trials1,2. ER analyses of key efficacy and safety endpoints were conducted to support the dosing recommendation of T-DXd in HER2m NSCLC. Methods: Exposure-efficacy (EE) analysis was performed using confirmed objective response (cORR) data from HER2m NSCLC in Phase 1-2 trials (N = 181). The dataset included primary analysis data cut from DL-011 and interim analysis data cut from DL-02. Exposure-safety (ES) analyses of T-DXd were performed, using pooled data from 11 Phase 1-3 trials (N = 1850) across tumor types, including DL-01 and DL-02, for safety endpoints of adverse events (AEs) associated with dose reduction or discontinuation, Grade3+ (G3+) AEs, serious AEs, G3+Anemia, G3+neutropenia, G3+thrombocytopenia, adjudicated any grade interstitial lung disease (ILD), and G3+ ILD. cORR and all safety endpoints, except ILD were analyzed by logistic regression; any grade ILD was analyzed by parametric time-to-event analysis. The T-DXd or DXd exposure metric and numerous patient-specific covariates were tested in the analysis. Results: T-DXd exposure had a positive but shallow relationship with cORR. The predicted cORR varied from 57% (95% credible interval (CrI): [36, 77]) to 65% (95% CrI: [41, 84]) across 5th and 95th percentile of T-DXd exposure respectively. No clinically meaningful difference in cORR was estimated across 5.4 and 6.4 mg/kg doses with predicted cORR values of 53% (95% CrI: [44, 60]) and 55% (95% CrI: [47, 62]) at T-DXd doses of 5.4 mg/kg and 6.4 mg/kg, respectively. ES relationships were consistent with previous T-DXd ES analyses in breast cancer (BC). Model-predicted AE rates were lower (up to 9%) in 5.4 mg/kg compared to the 6.4 mg/kg dose. Model-predicted safety at 5.4 mg/kg dose in HER2m NSCLC was similar to the approved dose of 5.4 mg/kg in BC. Conclusions: The ER analyses showed no clinically meaningful difference in efficacy between 5.4 and 6.4 mg/kg doses of T-DXd; and safety events were lower in 5.4 mg/kg, thus supporting the 5.4 mg/kg recommended dose for HER2m NSCLC. These findings were later confirmed based on primary analysis in DL-022 and support the utility of ER analyses in dosing recommendation. Reference: Li BT et al. N Engl J Med 2022;386:241-51 Goto K et al. J Clin Oncol 41:4852-4863. Clinical trial information: NCT03505710 , NCT04644237 .

Abstract GS01-02: Phase 3 study of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab or placebo plus chemotherapy, followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab or placebo plus endocrine therapy for early-stage high-risk ER+/HER2− breast cancer: KEYNOTE-756

Abstract Background: KEYNOTE-756 (NCT03725059) is a global phase 3 study of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab or placebo + chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab or placebo + endocrine therapy (ET) in patients with early-stage high-risk ER+/HER2– breast cancer. Here, we report primary pCR results and residual cancer burden (RCB) outcomes. Methods: Eligible patients with T1c-2 (≥2 cm) cN1-2 or T3-4 cN0-2, centrally confirmed, grade 3, invasive ductal ER+/HER2− breast cancer were randomized 1:1 to receive neoadjuvant pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W or placebo, both given with paclitaxel QW for 12 weeks, then 4 cycles of doxorubicin or epirubicin + cyclophosphamide (neoadjuvant treatment). After definitive surgery (± radiation therapy), patients received pembrolizumab or placebo for 9 cycles + standard ET. Stratification factors include region (Eastern Europe, China, or Other), tumor PD-L1 status (CPS ≥1 [positive] vs CPS &amp;lt; 1 [negative]), nodal involvement (positive vs negative), ER positivity (≥10% vs &amp;lt; 10%) and anthracycline schedule (Q3W vs Q2W). Dual primary endpoints are pCR (ypT0/Tis ypN0) and EFS. Secondary endpoints include OS, pCR defined as ypT0 ypN0 and ypT0/Tis and safety. RCB was an exploratory endpoint and was assessed by a local pathologist at the time of surgery. RCB-0, -1, -2, and -3 denote increasingly larger residual disease. Results: 1278 patients were randomized to pembrolizumab + chemotherapy (n=635) or placebo + chemotherapy (n=643). At the final pCR analysis (May 25, 2023, first interim analysis data cutoff), median follow-up was 33.2 mo (range, 9.7-51.8). In the ITT population, pembrolizumab + chemotherapy showed a statistically significant improvement in pCR (ypT0/Tis ypN0) vs placebo + chemotherapy: 24.3% (95% CI, 21.0-27.8) vs 15.6% (95% CI, 12.8-18.6); estimated difference, 8.5 percentage points (95% CI, 4.2-12.8); P=0.00005; results were consistent for the secondary pCR definitions, ypT0 ypN0 (21.3% vs 12.8%) and ypT0/Tis (29.4% vs 18.2%). The benefit of pembrolizumab + chemotherapy on pCR was generally consistent in the prespecified subgroups. There were more patients with RCB-0 (24.7% vs. 15.6%) and RCB-1 (10.2% vs 8.1%) and fewer patients in the RCB-2 (40.8% vs. 45.3%) and RCB-3 categories (20.5% vs. 28.9%) in the pembrolizumab group versus the placebo group. In the neoadjuvant phase, grade ≥3 treatment-related AE rates were 52.5% with pembrolizumab + chemotherapy and 46.4% with placebo + chemotherapy, with 1 death in the pembrolizumab arm due to acute myocardial infarction. EFS results are still immature and continue to be evaluated. Conclusions: The addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy significantly increased the pCR rate and shifted RCB to lower residual disease categories in patients with early-stage high-risk ER+/HER2− breast cancer. Safety was consistent with the known profiles of each regimen. Citation Format: Fatima Cardoso, Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Heather McArthur, Peter Schmid, Javier Cortés, Nadia Harbeck, Melinda Telli, David Cescon, Peter A. Fasching, Zhimin Shao, Delphine Loirat, Yeon Hee Park, Manuel Gonzalez Fernandez, Gabor Rubovszky, Seock-Ah Im, Rina Hui, Toshimi Takano, Fabrice André, Hiroyuki Yasojima, Zhenzhen Liu, Yu Ding, Liyi Jia, Vassiliki Karantza, Konstantinos Tryfonidis, Aditya Bardia. Phase 3 study of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab or placebo plus chemotherapy, followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab or placebo plus endocrine therapy for early-stage high-risk ER+/HER2− breast cancer: KEYNOTE-756 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr GS01-02.

Effectiveness of early pharmaceutical interventions in symptomatic COVID-19 patients: A randomized clinical trial.

We assessed the effectiveness of oral Hydroxychloroquine (HC), Azithromycin (AZ) and Oseltamivir (OS), alone or combined, among patients hospitalized with mildly symptomatic coronavirus infectious disease (COVID-19). Following the approval of the National Bioethics Committee and prospective registration (clinicaltrials.gov NCT04338698), a multicenter randomized clinical trial of adaptive design was conducted at 10 multispecialty hospitals in Pakistan. Patients were randomized into seven treatment groups. Starting April 15, 2020, consenting, eligible, otherwise healthy adult patients or those with co-morbidities under control, were recruited if they presented with mildly symptomatic COVID-19 (scored 3 on a 7-point ordinal scale anchored between 1 = not hospitalized, able to undertake normal activities, to 7 = death) confirmed by quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR). Two primary outcomes were assessed by day seven: Turning qRT-PCR negative; and clinical improvement of two points from the baseline. Outcome rates were compared using a chi-square test. Multiple imputations were applied to handle missing data. An interim data analysis was carried out on July 19, 2020, following which the study continued without treatment group changes. Data Safety and Monitoring Board advised to stop recruitment due to its futility on January 18, 2021. Of 471 patients randomized, a total of 426 (90.4%) completed the follow-up for primary outcomes. Based on imputed data analyses at day seven: Total qRT-PCR negative cases were 137/471 (29%, 95% CI 25.0 - 33.4). By day seven, a total of 111/471 (23.5%, 95% CI 19.8 - 27.6) showed clinical improvement. No serious or non-serious adverse event was reported. Among patients with mild COVID-19, there was no statistically significant difference in the effectiveness of oral antimalarial, antiviral, or antibiotic treatments.Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT04338698.

Pembrolizumab versus placebo as adjuvant therapy in resected stage IIB or IIC melanoma: Outcomes in histopathologic subgroups from the randomized, double-blind, phase 3 KEYNOTE-716 trial

BackgroundAdjuvant pembrolizumab significantly improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) versus placebo in the phase 3 KEYNOTE-716 study of resected stage IIB or IIC melanoma. At the prespecified...

Safety and effectiveness of the radium-223-taxane treatment sequence in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in a global observational study (REASSURE).

Radium-223 and taxane chemotherapy each improve survival of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Whether the radium-223-taxane sequence could extend survival without cumulative toxicity was explored. The global, prospective, observational REASSURE study (NCT02141438) assessed real-world safety and effectiveness of radium-223 in patients with mCRPC. Using data from the prespecified second interim analysis (data cutoff, March 20, 2019), hematologic events and overall survival (OS) were evaluated in patients who were chemotherapy-naive at radium-223 initiation and subsequently received taxane chemotherapy starting ≤90days ("immediate") or >90days ("delayed") after the last radium-223 dose. Following radium-223 therapy, 182 patients received docetaxel (172 [95%]) and/or cabazitaxel (44 [24%]); 34 patients (19%) received both. Seventy-three patients (40%) received immediate chemotherapy and 109 patients (60%) received delayed chemotherapy. Median time from last radium-223 dose to first taxane cycle was 3.6months (range, 0.3-28.4). Median duration of first taxane was 3.7months (range, 0-22.0). Fourteen patients (10 in the immediate and four in the delayed subgroup) had grade 3/4 hematologic events during taxane chemotherapy, including neutropenia in two patients in the delayed subgroup and thrombocytopenia in one patient in each subgroup. Median OS was 24.3months from radium-223 initiation and 11.8months from start of taxane therapy. In real-world clinical practice settings, a heterogeneous population of patients who received sequential radium-223-taxane therapy had a low incidence of hematologic events, with a median survival of 1year from taxane initiation. Thus, taxane chemotherapy is a feasible option for those who progress after radium-223. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02141438. Radium-223 and chemotherapy are treatment options for metastatic prostate cancer, which increase survival but may affect production of blood cells as a side effect. We wanted to know what would happen if patients received chemotherapy after radium-223. Among the 182 men treated with radium-223 who went on to receive chemotherapy, only two men had severe side effects affecting white blood cell production (neutropenia) during chemotherapy. On average, the 182 men lived for 2years after starting radium-223 and 1year after starting chemotherapy. In conclusion, patients may benefit from chemotherapy after radium-223 treatment without increasing the risk of side effects.

498 - Real-world use and effectiveness of upadacitinib in adults and adolescents with atopic dermatitis: preliminary analysis of the real-world multicountry AD-VISE study

Abstract Introduction &amp; Objectives Upadacitinib (UPA) 15 and 30 mg once daily is approved for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in several jurisdictions, including the European Union, Japan, Canada, and the United States, with indication/posology differences. Clinical studies have documented the safety and efficacy of UPA; however, real-world data on UPA are limited. The AD-VISE study objective is to characterize the real-world utilization patterns and effectiveness of UPA 15 and 30 mg in adults and adolescents with AD in clinical practice. Materials &amp; Methods AD-VISE is an ongoing observational, prospective, multicountry study to assess the use of UPA in routine clinical practice for 2 years. Adult and adolescent patients (pts) receiving UPA for AD are being enrolled. Primary effectiveness outcome measures included validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD) 0/1 at month 4. Other outcome measures included Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Worst Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (WP-NRS), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). This interim analysis (data cutoff February 27, 2023) reports baseline data and 2- and 4-month effectiveness data. Effectiveness analyses included pts that were enrolled at least 4 months by the data cutoff date or discontinued from the study; non-responder imputation with multiple imputation (NRI-MI) was used. Results Baseline analyses included 267 pts, of whom 21 (7.9%) were adolescents; effectiveness analyses included 209 patients (NRI-MI). Overall, 155 (58.1%) pts started on UPA 15 mg and 112 (41.9%) started on UPA 30 mg. Most pts in this analysis were from Canada (56.2%), followed by Russia (10.9%) and Australia (8.6%). Mean (SD) UPA exposure was 218.8 (±117.6) days; 5.6% of pts discontinued UPA and 3.7% discontinued the study. The most common reason for starting on UPA 15 mg was attempting lowest possible effective dose (42.9%) and on 30 mg, high disease burden/severity of skin symptoms (35.2%). More pts starting UPA 30 mg vs 15 mg were between 18 to &amp;lt;65 years old (96.4% vs 76.1%), male (61.6% vs 51.0%), had severe AD (vIGA-AD score 4: 53.6% vs 46.3%), had prurigo nodules (30.6% vs 18.4%), asthma (45.5% vs 24.5%), and prior biologic systemic therapy use (16.1% vs 10.3%) . More than half of the pts (51.2%) achieved vIGA-AD 0/1 at month 2, and this proportion increased to 61.3% at month 4. Similarly, rate of achieving EASI 90 (month 2: 46.9%; month 4: 57.2%) and DLQI 0/1 (month 2: 35.1%; month 4: 41.3%) increased, whereas rates were maintained for ≥4-point WP-NRS improvement (month 2: 68.1%; month 4: 69.3%). Similar results were observed with other endpoints. Conclusion Initial findings from the AD-VISE study, the largest study to report multicountry real-world data on UPA treatment patterns and effectiveness in AD, suggest that most pts achieved clear/almost clear skin and clinically meaningful itch improvement by month 4. Because this is a real-world observational study, it was expected that physicians start with UPA dose per local label. The main reason for starting UPA 30 mg was high disease burden/severity of skin symptoms, whereas 15 mg was started to attempt the lowest possible effective dose. More pts starting UPA 30 mg vs 15 mg were adults, male, and had prior biologic systemic therapy use.

Dose titration of once-nightly sodium oxybate: analysis of interim data from RESTORE

Dose titration of once-nightly sodium oxybate: analysis of interim data from RESTORE

Interim data analysis and premature termination in superiority trials: a comprehensive guide and recommendations for multiple testing of the primary study hypothesis

Interim data analysis and premature termination in superiority trials: a comprehensive guide and recommendations for multiple testing of the primary study hypothesis