Analog Scale Leg Pain Research Articles

Utilization of condoliase therapy versus surgery for lumbar disc herniation and comparison of post-treatment motor improvement

Study DesignDouble-center retrospective study. PurposeUtilization trends in interventional treatment for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) have not yet been examined. Furthermore, limited information is currently available on motor recovery with condoliase therapy. Therefore, the present study investigated utilization trends in treatment for LDH and the effects of condoliase therapy on muscle weakness. MethodsThis retrospective, double-center study involved patients with leg pain caused by LDH who received interventional treatment between September 2017 and August 2022. LDH patients were divided into two groups: an operative treatment group and condoliase therapy group. The period between September 2017 and August 2022 was divided into 5 equal parts and changes in the percentage of intervention treatment were examined. Motor recovery was also assessed in the two groups. Patients receiving condoliase therapy were divided into two groups: an effective group and non-effective group. Sex, age, the body mass index, duration of symptoms, herniation level, neurological and radiographic findings, a visual analog scale for leg pain, and the Oswestry disability index were examined in the two groups. ResultsSubjects included 226 males and 115 females with a mean age of 49.2 years, mean BMI of 22.8, and mean duration of symptoms of 5.0 months. The utilization of condoliase therapy for LDH surpassed surgery in the third year after its introduction. In the fourth year, condoliase therapy became the main treatment for LDH. Lower limb muscle strength improved in 76 % of cases receiving condoliase therapy. ConclusionsCondoliase therapy has become an intermediate treatment before surgery in our institutions. Motor recovery in patients receiving condoliase therapy was not inferior to that after surgery; however, in cases with severe muscle weakness with manual muscle test ≤3, the improvement rate was approximately 60 %. These results will be useful for clinicians when providing informed consent and selecting condoliase therapy.

Acupuncture Modulation of Chronic Neuropathic Pain and Its Association With Brain Functional Properties

Chronic neuropathic pain has been one of the prominent causes of disability, and acupuncture has shown promise in treatment. The present study aimed to characterize acupuncture modulation of chronic neuropathic pain and explore the related functional brain changes. Sixty chronic sciatica patients were divided into acupuncture- or sham acupuncture groups and received 10 sessions of treatment during 4 weeks. The visual analog scale for leg pain, oswestry disability index (ODI), and resting-state functional magnetic resonance images were assessed at baseline and after treatment. Then, fractional amplitudes of low-frequency fluctuations (fALFF) and support vector regression analyses were performed. Compared with sham acupuncture, acupuncture significantly improved symptoms, including visual analog scale for leg pain and ODI. In addition, acupuncture exhibited increased fALFF of the right superior parietal lobule (SPL) and right postcentral gyrus. Furthermore, the actual 4-week ODI values were positively correlated with the support vector regression-predicted values based on the right SPL fALFF and baseline clinical measurements. These results indicate that the spontaneous neural activity of the right SPL and right postcentral gyrus may be involved in the modulation of acupuncture in chronic neuropathic pain. In addition, the spontaneous neural activity of the right SPL might be used as the predictor of response to acupuncture therapy. PerspectiveThis clinical neuroimaging study elucidated the neural basis of acupuncture in chronic sciatica. Neurological indicators and clinical measurements could be used as potential predictors of acupuncture response. This study combines neuroimaging and artificial intelligence techniques to highlight the potential of acupuncture for the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain. Trial registration numberChinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2100044585, http://www.chictr.org.cn.

Effects of the Severity of Stenosis on Clinical Outcomes of Indirect Decompression Using Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Background: No consensus has been reached regarding the efficacy of indirect decompression through oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) in severe lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). This study investigated the impact of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based grading of central and foraminal stenosis on OLIF outcomes in LSS patients and identified risk factors for postoperative clinical dissatisfaction. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed LSS patients who underwent OLIF with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Clinical scores obtained preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively were analyzed using the substantial clinical benefit (SCB) framework. The severity of central and foraminal stenosis in the initial MRI was assessed through qualitative grading systems. Results: Among the 145 patients, with a mean follow-up of 33.7 months, those with severe central stenosis showed a significantly higher proportion of patients achieving SCB in the visual analog scale for leg pain (94.5% versus 83.1%; p = 0.044) at one year postoperatively than those without. However, those with severe foraminal stenosis showed significantly higher Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores (p = 0.024), and lower walking ability scores in the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) (p = 0.004) at one year postoperatively than those without. The presence of a foraminal osteophyte of the superior articular process (SAP) was a significant risk factor responsible for not achieving SCB in ODI and walking ability in JOABPEQ at one year postoperatively (odds ratio: 0.20 and 0.22, respectively). Conclusions: After OLIF, patients with severe central stenosis showed clinical outcomes comparable to those without. The improvement in ODI and walking ability in JOABPEQ was limited in patients with severe foraminal stenosis. Surgeons should consider direct decompression in cases with the presence of foraminal osteophytes of SAP.

The impact of instrumented lumbar fusion surgery on psychiatric problems in elderly patients with degenerative spinal stenosis: The observational study.

This is a prospective cohort study to investigate the effects of instrumented lumbar fusion surgery on psychiatric problems, including anxiety, insomnia, and depression, in patients with degenerative spinal stenosis, as well as on pain and the activities of daily living. Surgery was performed in the patients with Schizas grade C or D spinal stenosis with; if a patient's quality of life was impaired for at least 3 months or if patient had neurologic deficits. Finally, 69 patients were reviewed. Beck anxiety inventory, insomnia severity index, geriatric depression scale short form-Korean, visual analog scale for back pain, visual analog scale for leg pain, and Oswestry disability index was measured on the day surgery was decided on (T1), the day before surgery (T2), the day before discharge (T3), and 6 months after surgery (T4). The patients had mild degrees of anxiety, insomnia, and depression at T1, and Beck anxiety inventory, insomnia severity index, visual analog scale for back pain, visual analog scale for leg pain, and Oswestry disability index improved significantly by T4. In elderly patients with degenerative spinal stenosis, instrumented lumbar fusion surgery improves not only pain and activities of daily living, but also anxiety and insomnia. However, there was no improvement in depression over the 6-month follow-up period.

Awake Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Decompression Under Local Anesthesia for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in the Elderly: A Feasibility Study with Technique Note.

Here, we introduce a novel strategy of awake unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) decompression, which applies conscious sedation combined with stepwise local anesthesia (LA) as an alternative to general anesthesia (GA). The study aims to evaluate the feasibility of awake UBE decompression for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) in elderly patients. This retrospective study included 31 consecutive patients who received awake UBE decompression for DLSS in our institution from January 2021 to March 2022. Clinical results were evaluated using patient-reported outcomes measures (PROM) including visual analog scale for leg pain (VAS-LP), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and modified MacNab criteria. The anesthesia effectiveness and intraoperative experience were evaluated by intraoperative VAS and satisfaction rating system. UBE decompression was successfully performed in all patients under LA combined with conscious sedation. 26 (83.9%) patients rated the intraoperative experience as satisfactory (excellent or good) and 5 (16.1%) as fair. The mean intraoperative VAS was 3.41±1.26. The VAS and ODI at each follow-up stage after surgery were significantly improved compared to preoperative scores (p < 0.01). At the last follow-up, 28 patients (90.3%) classified the surgical outcome as good or excellent, and 3 (9.7%) as fair. There were no serious complications or adverse reactions observed in the study. Our preliminary results suggest that awake UBE decompression is a feasible and promising alternative for elderly patients with DLSS.

Annular Closure Device Reduces Symptomatic Reherniation Rates: Results of a Meta-analysis

Background: The scope of existing annular closure device (ACD) studies examining long-term follow-up data is limited. There is a paucity of studies that report and analyze recent outcomes data following ACD use. Purpose: We sought to summarize the available long-term follow-up data on postoperative outcomes of the Barricaid (Intrinsic Therapeutics) ACD. Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, the PubMed, Cochrane, and OVID databases were searched to identify studies after 2015 that include direct evaluation of an ACD in a clinical context with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up and inclusion of reherniation and complication rates, while excluding case reports, reviews, and meta-analyses. Outcome measures included patient demographics, study characteristics, surgical technique, defect measurement technique, perioperative statistics, radiographic assessments, complications, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and postoperative outcomes. Results: Five studies—2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 2 retrospective studies, and 1 prospective cohort study—were included. Symptomatic reherniation rates in the ACD populations ranged from 3% to 18.8%. Two studies found that control groups herniate significantly more than their ACD counterparts (ACD 18.8% vs non-ACD 31.6% and ACD 3.33% vs non-ACD 20.0%). No significant differences were found in reoperation rates. Of the 4 studies that reported PROMs data, all observed relative improvement in each cohort, although pooled analysis did not find significant differences between ACD and non-ACD groups for Oswestry Disability Index and visual analogue scale–leg pain at 2-year follow-up. Conclusions: For patients undergoing diskectomy for lumbar disk herniation, the Barricaid device is effective in reducing symptomatic reherniation but does not appear to alter postoperative PROMs or reoperation rates. Surgeons must consider that device-related complications can occur.

Risk Factors for Neurologic Deficits in Patients With Spinal Epidural Abscess: An Analysis of One-Hundred-Forty Cases.

retrospective study. In addition to surgical treatment of spinal epidural abscesses (SEA), a conservative, medical treatment for patients without acute neurologic deficits has been proposed. However, the risk factors for neurologic deficits are unclear. This study aims to identify factors predisposing patients with SEA to neurological impairment. All patients treated for SEA between 2008 and 2021 were identified from a prospective vertebral-osteomyelitis registry of a tertiary referral centre. Patient demographics, comorbidities, pathogens, degree of osseous destruction, location of SEA and preoperative neurologic status were retrospectively collected. Differences between patients with (Group 1) and without (Group 2) pretreatment neurologic deficits were assessed by univariate and logistic regression analysis. A total of 140 patients with SEA were included. Forty-three patients (31%) had a neurologic deficit and 97 patients (69%) had no neurologic deficit prior to therapy. The prevalence of diabetes mellitus (35% vs 19%, P = .03), median visual analogue scale leg pain (8 vs 5, P = .01), median American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Score (3 vs 2.6, P = .003) and mean Body-Mass-Index (29 vs 26, P = .02) differed between Group 1 and 2 in univariate analysis. In multivariable analysis, diabetes mellitus (odds ratio = 2.7), female sex (odds ratio = 2.5) and ASA-Score (odds ratio = 2.4) were significant contributors for neurologic deficits. In patients with a SEA without neurologic deficits, the ASA score and diabetes mellitus should be considered, especially in female patients. These patients may be at a higher risk for developing a neurologic deficit and may benefit from an early surgical treatment.

Does physical therapy impact clinical outcomes after lumbar decompression surgery?

The objectives of our study were to (1) determine if physical therapy (PT) impacts patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) after lumbar decompression surgery and (2) determine if PT impacts postsurgical readmissions or reoperations after lumbar decompression surgery. Patients >18 years of age who underwent primary one- or two-level lumbar decompression at our institution were identified. Patient demographics, surgical characteristics, surgical outcomes (all-cause 90 days readmissions and 90 days surgical readmissions), and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) were compared between the groups. Multivariate linear regression was utilized to determine the individual predictors of 90 days readmissions and PROMs at the 1-year postoperative point. Alpha was set at P < 0.05. Of the 1003 patients included, 421 attended PT postoperatively. On univariate analysis, PT attendance did not significantly impact 90-day surgical reoperations (P = 0.225). Although bivariate analysis suggests that attendance of PT is associated with worse improvement in physical function (P = 0.041), increased preoperative Visual Analogue Scale leg pain (0 = 0.004), and disability (P = 0.006), as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index, our multivariate analysis, which accounts for confounding variables found there was no difference in PROM improvement and PT was not an independent predictor of 90-day all-cause readmissions (P = 0.06). Instead, Charlson Comorbidity Index (P = 0.025) and discharge to a skilled nursing facility (P = 0.013) independently predicted greater 90-day all-cause readmissions. Postoperative lumbar decompression PT attendance does not significantly affect clinical improvement, as measured by PROMs or surgical outcomes including all-cause 90 days readmissions and 90-day surgical readmissions.

Systematic Review of Current Literature on Clinical Outcomes of Uniportal Interlaminar Contralateral Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomy for Foraminal Stenosis

Uniportal interlaminar contralateral endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy (ICELF) aims to achieve decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis in the contralateral lateral recess and foraminal and extraforaminal regions of the same segment. This technique is performed under normal saline irrigation using an endoscope with optical lens magnification close to the targeted stenotic segment and has the potential of lower incidence of exiting nerve root dorsal root ganglion irritation. A systematic review of the ICELF technique was conducted from March 2000 to March 2022. Articles were selected with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Eligibility of studies was independently determined by 2 reviewers, and disagreements were resolved by a third author. Eight retrospective cohort studies comprising 194 patients with foraminal stenosis who underwent uniportal ICELF were selected for systematic review. Mean age range was 62-79 years, and surgical duration was 48-73.5 minutes. There was significant improvement in Oswestry Disability Index and visual analog scale leg pain score in the included studies. Four studies met the minimum clinically significant difference for leg pain, with visual analog scale improved >5 points and Oswestry Disability Index improved >8.2 points. Four studies reported a majority of the operated patients with good or excellent outcomes following surgery, with a low rate of complications in the studies selected. There is low-level evidence that ICELF when performed by an experienced spinal endoscopic surgeon is effective in providing pain relief and improved function with low rate of complications in select patients.

Efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopy versus other spine surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BackgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) versus other forms of spine surgery.MethodsElectronic databases were systematically searched up to February 2022. The authors used Review Manager 5.3 to manage the data and perform the review.ResultsAfter the preliminary selection of 239 studies from electronic databases, the full inclusion criteria were applied; 16 studies were found to be eligible for inclusion. These 16 studies enrolled 1,488 patients: 653 patients in the UBE group, 570 in the microendoscopic discectomy group, 153 in the percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy group, and 70 in the posterior lumbar interbody fusion group. UBE was superior to microendoscopic discectomy regarding 1-day Visual Analog Scale(VAS) back pain scores (P < 0.00001). No difference was found between UBE and microendoscopic discectomy regarding 1-day Visual Analog Scale leg pain scores (P = 0.25), long-term VAS back pain scores (P = 0.06), long-term VAS leg pain scores (P = 0.05), Oswestry Disability Index scores (P = 0.09) or complications (P = 0.19). Pooled analysis indicated that UBE was similar to percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy regarding 1-day VAS back pain scores (P = 0.71), 1-day VAS leg pain scores (P = 0.37), long-term VAS back pain scores (P = 0.75), long-term VAS leg pain scores (P = 0.41), Oswestry Disability Index scores (P = 0.07) and complications (P = 0.88). One study reported no difference between UBE and posterior lumbar interbody fusion regarding long-term VAS back pain, long-term VAS leg pain, or Oswestry Disability Index scores.ConclusionsUBE is superior to microendoscopic discectomy to relieve back pain 1 day postoperatively. However, these two procedures are similar regarding 1-day leg pain relief, long-term effects, and safety. UBE and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy are similar regarding 1-day pain relief, long-term effects and safety. More evidence is needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of UBE versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis Classification That Guides Surgical Treatment.

There are numerous radiological and anatomical studies on lumbar foramina in the literature, but there are no distinctive studies about the relationship between treatment and the type of foraminal stenosis. This study was conducted to better evaluate foraminal stenosis and to plan treatment accordingly. Foraminal stenosis was divided into 2 groups: stable and unstable stenosis. Both groups were also divided into 4 subgroups in relation to the cause and type of compression and based on the structure of the intervertebral disc. The visual analog scale for leg pain (VAS-LP) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were investigated before and after surgery. A total of 115 patients (59 women and 56 men) underwent surgery for lumbar foraminal stenosis. The mean patient age was 56.1 years (range 17-80 years). The mean follow-up was 29 months (range 24-39 months). There were 36 patients (32%) with stable foraminal stenosis and 79 patients (68%) with unstable foraminal stenosis. The majority of the patients were identified as having unstable type 1 foraminal stenosis (45 of 115). The VAS-LP and ODI scores for each group decreased gradually during the follow-up periods and showed significant decrease during the last follow-up (P < 0.001). Interobserver and intraobserver agreement in the classification of foraminal stenosis was found to be nearly perfect. No patients experienced postoperative radiculopathy complication. Only 2 patients experienced superficial operation site infection and 1 showed deep wound infection. The patient who had a deep wound infection needed to repeat surgery for the infection. We introduced a novel classification system for lumbar foraminal stenosis. We aimed to guide appropriate treatment modality depending on the determined classification. This classification helps to determine the optimal treatment. In the light of our findings, the patients who were operated according to our classification experienced satisfactory clinical outcomes and low complication rates.

Full-Endoscopic Ventral Facetectomy vs Open Laminectomy for Lumbar Lateral Recess Stenosis: A Comparative Study and Brief Literature Review.

Lateral recess stenosis (LRS) represents a major etiology of pain and disability in recent years. The aim of the present study was to compare the clinical outcomes of full-endoscopic ventral facetectomy (FEVF) vs conventional open laminectomy (OL) for surgical treatment of lumbar LRS. Ninety individuals with diagnosed LRS according to clinical and radiological criteria were included in this study. Patients were appropriately classified into 2 distinct groups according to received treatment. Group A was constituted from 48 patients subjected to FEVF. Contrariwise, the 42 patients of Group B underwent OL. All patients were consecutively evaluated with particular clinical scores preoperatively and at 6 weeks, 3, months, 6 months, 12 months, and 2 years postoperatively. Clinical assessment was conducted with the visual analog scale for leg pain (VAS-LP) and back pain (VAS-BP) and with the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) medical questionnaire. Values of all studied indices in both groups featured a major clinical improvement in 6 weeks with subsequent quantitatively minor albeit still statistically significant amelioration until the end of follow-up at 2 years. Comparative evaluation of recorded parameters between the 2 groups disclosed that VAS-BP, bodily pain, and role emotional indices of SF-36 were quantitatively and statistically differentiated in favor of Group A in 6 weeks, featuring an amelioration that persisted until the end of follow-up. Registered values of the other parameters were not found to demonstrate a quantitatively and clinically noteworthy differentiation between the 2 groups. FEVF represents a feasible, safe, and beneficial alternative for surgical therapy of patients with LRS, featuring comparable outcomes with conventional OL. Lumbar LRS represents a frequent entity with remarkable clinical sequelae. FEVF represents a novel, groundbreaking and minimally invasive technique that should be considered as a safe and efficacious alternative over conventional open surgery in specific patients with LRS.

P.230 Modic changes and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar surgery for disc herniation

Background: Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a risk factor for Modic change (MC) development on spinal MRI. MC has been associated with worse pre- and post-operative pain, disability, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We examined the relationship between pre-operative MC and post-operative assessment scores for patients receiving discectomy (LD) or transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF) for LDH. Methods: We reviewed 285 primary single-level surgeries. Pre-operative and 12-month post-operative assessment scores: Visual Analog Scale Leg-Pain (VAS-LP), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Short-Form-36 Physical Component Summary (SF-36-PCS). MC subgroup on pre-operative MRI was recorded by a single neuroradiologist. Results: 179 patients were included. The sample prevalence of MC on pre-operative MRI was 62%; MC2 was most common (35%). No differences in pre-operative scores were identified, regardless of present or absent MC. For the overall cohort, improvement in assessment scores were observed: SF-36 improved an average of 8.2 points (95% CI: [5.8, 10.7]), ODI by 11.3 points (95% CI: [8.7, 14.0]), and VAS by 2.8 points (95% CI: [2.1, 3.5]). In nearly all cases, MCID values were met. Conclusions: Clinically significant improvement in post-operative pain, disability, and HRQoL was observed for both procedures. Modic change on pre-operative MRI was not associated with worse clinical assessment scores.

Modic Change and Clinical Assessment Scores in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Surgery for Disk Herniation.

Retrospective cohort study. To examine the relationship between preoperative Modic change (MC) and postoperative clinical assessment scores for patients receiving lumbar discectomy or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar disk herniation. Lumbar disk herniation is a risk factor for MC development. MC on spinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been associated with worse preoperative and postoperative clinical assessment scores. We reviewed data for 285 primary single-level surgeries. Preoperative and 12-month postoperative assessment scores were recorded using the visual analog scale leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index, and Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary. MC subgroup on preoperative MRI was recorded by a single neuroradiologist. One hundred seventy-nine patients (female, 56%; age-53±13 y) with preoperative MRI were included. Age and sex were similar across MC subgroups. The sample prevalence of MC on preoperative MRI was 62%, and MC2 was the most common subgroup (35%). No differences in preoperative assessment scores were identified, regardless of presence or absence of MC. For the overall cohort, improvement in assessment scores were observed: Short Form-36 improved an average of 8.2 points [95% CI (95% CI), 5.8-10.7], Oswestry Disability Index by 11.3 points (95% CI, 8.7-14.0), and visual analog scale by 2.8 points (95% CI, 2.1-3.5). In nearly all cases, MCID values were met, even when stratifying by MC subgroup. Few differences in postoperative assessment scores were identified when comparing across MC1, MC2, or no MC groups. Statistically and clinically significant improvement in postoperative clinical assessment scores was observed for both lumbar discectomy and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion groups. MC on preoperative MRI was not associated with worse preoperative or postoperative clinical assessment scores. Level III.

Assessment of Rod Material Types in Spine Surgery Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Lumbar spine fusion surgery is traditionally performed with rigid fixation. Because the rigidity is often supraphysiologic, semirigid rods were developed. To the best of our knowledge, a comprehensive evaluation of rod material type on surgical outcomes has yet to be conducted. A systematic review based on PRISMA guidelines was conducted across 3 electronic databases. After examination for inclusion and exclusion criteria, data were extracted from the studies. Seventeen studies, including 1399 patients, were included in this review. The mean rigid rod fusion rate is 92.2% and 95.5% for semirigid rods (P= 0.129). The mean improvement in back pain was 60.6% in rigid rods and 71.6% in semirigid rods. The improvement in leg pain was 81.9% and 77.2%, respectively. There were no differences in visual analog scale back pain score (P= 0.098), visual analog scale leg pain score (P= 0.136), or in functional improvement between rigid and semirigid rods (P= 0.143). There was no difference (P= 0.209) in the reoperation rate between rigid rods (13.1%) and semirigid rods (6.5%). There was a comparable incidence of adjacent segment disease (3%), screw fracture (1.7%), and wound infection (1.9%) between rod material types. There is a moderate level of evidence supporting that surgical intervention results in high fusion rates regardless of rod material type. Surgical intervention improves back pain, leg pain, and function, with neither material type showing clear superiority. There are comparable rates of reoperation, development of adjacent segment disease, development of mechanical complications, and incidence of infection in both rigid and semirigid rods. Further studies regarding rod material type are warranted.

P115. Patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis maintain clinically relevant improvement five years after surgery

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) is a common condition in the elderly population which is associated with significant morbidity and decreased quality of life. For patients where pain and disability are unacceptable, surgical intervention with lumbar decompression is a commonly used treatment option, shown to provide relief of symptoms and pain. Few studies have examined if a clinically relevant difference in function is obtained, and whether this effect is sustained at long term. PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate patient reported outcomes and whether patients obtain a clinically relevant improvement after surgery, and if the effect of treatment is sustained at 1, 2 and 5 years postoperatively. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING The study was performed as a retrospective cohort study on patients who underwent surgery at the Spine Centre of Southern Denmark, Middelfart, the Regional Hospital of Silkeborg and University Hospital of Zealand in Koge. PATIENT SAMPLE A total of 1,241 patients had surgery for LSS with DS during the inclusion period. All patients underwent decompression and non-instrumented fusion. We had follow-up data available on our main outcome measure (ODI) on 79.8% at 1 year, 74.8% at 2 year, and 74.2% at 5-year follow-up. OUTCOME MEASURES Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), EuroQoL-5D-3L (EQ-5D), Visual Analogue Scale Leg Pain (VAS-leg) and Visual Analogue Scale Back Pain (VAS-back). METHODS The study was performed as a multicentre registry-based retrospective cohort study using data collected prospectively in the Danish national surgical spine database; DaneSpine. In DaneSpine, patient reported outcomes are collected preoperatively, and 1, 2,5 and 10 years postoperative. This study evaluates both preoperative and postoperative outcomes. Data was collected via patient reported questionnaires, all PRO measures were filled out preoperatively and at 1, 2 and 5 years postoperatively. Based on the outcome measures, the patients who obtained a minimal clinically relevant difference in outcome (MCID) were identified at 1, 2 and 5 years postsurgery. RESULTS We found a mean change from 1 to 5 years of -20.9 on ODI; a mean change of 0.22 on EQ.5D, 30.5 on VAS leg and 20.6 on VAS back. We found that 90% of patients obtained a clinically relevant increase in one or more PROs. Apart from VAS back, there was no statistical difference in percentage of patients who obtained MCID at 1, 2 and 5-years postsurgery. CONCLUSIONS Surgery for LSS with DS has favorable results, with most patients experiencing a clinically important change in outcome measures that is maintained for at least 5 years. Of the patients who undergo surgery for LSS with DS, 90% can expect a meaningful change in outcome measures on at least one parameter. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

269. Clinically relevant improvement is maintained 5 years after surgery for spinal stenosis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common condition in the elderly population and is associated with significant morbidity and decreased quality of life. Many patients manage with little to no treatment, but for the patients in whom lower extremity pain and disability are unacceptable, surgical intervention is shown to provide good relief of symptoms and pain. There is little evidence on how many patients obtain a clinically relevant improvement in function and whether this effect is sustained 5 years after surgery. PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate the proportion of patients who achieve and maintain a clinically relevant improvement at 1, 2 and 5 years postoperatively. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING The study was performed as a retrospective cohort study on patients who underwent surgery at the Spine Centre of Southern Denmark, Middelfart; The Regional Hospital of Silkeborg and University Hospital of Zealand in Koge. PATIENT SAMPLE A total of 6,063 patients who underwent decompression due to spinal stenosis at three spine centers in Denmark were included in our study. We had follow-up data available on our main outcome measure (ODI) on 75% at 1-year, 70% at 2-year, and 62% at 5-year follow-up. OUTCOME MEASURES Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), EuroQoL-5D-3L (EQ-5D), visual analogue scale leg pain (VAS-leg) and visual analogue scale back pain (VAS-back). METHODS We included patients who underwent first-time decompression due to LSS at three tertiary Spine Centers in Denmark. Data was collected prospectively in the National Spine Registry of Denmark (DaneSpine). Based on the outcome measures, the patients who obtained a minimal clinically relevant difference in outcome (MCID) were identified at 1-, 2- and 5-years post-surgery. RESULTS The mean change from baseline to 5-years post-surgery was 0.2 on EQ-5D; -18.9 on ODI, -18.9 on VAS back and 29.8 on VAS. We found that 86% of patients obtained the MCID on at least one parameter, with 68.9% obtaining MCID on two or more outcome measures. VAS back was found with a statistically important difference in the percentage of patients who achieved MCID at 1- and 5-years postsurgery. For the remaining outcome measures no statistically important difference was found. CONCLUSIONS Decompression as treatment for LSS is a safe and reliable option with low complication rates. Most patients achieve a clinically relevant difference in outcome on one or more parameters, which is maintained 5 years after surgery. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

Clinical Application of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Surgery in Lumbar Discal Cyst

Discal cyst is very rare and can cause intractable low back pain and radiating leg pain. Symptoms are hard to distinguish from lumbar disc herniation. The best treatment for discal cyst is controversial. Most lumbar discal cysts are treated surgically, while most studies of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery are case reports. This study investigated the clinical value of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery for lumbar discal cyst. A retrospective study was conducted in 9patients with a discal cyst from June 2016 to November 2018. All patients had been treated by percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery via a superior vertebral pedicle notch approach. Surgical outcomes were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively using a visual analog scale for leg pain and the Oswestry Disability Index. At the final follow-up, patients were evaluated for clinical efficacy using modified Macnab criteria. All 9 patients had remission of symptoms after removal of discal cysts. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging showed that all patients had complete excision of discal cysts and complete decompression of the treated segment. There were no recurrent lesions during follow-up. Mean operative time was 68.67 ± 14.02 minutes. Mean hospitalization time was 4.22 ± 1.64 days. Preoperative visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index score improved significantly after surgery. Visual analog scale leg score improved from 7.88 ± 1.05 preoperatively to 1.78± 0.66 at final follow-up (P < 0.05), and ODI score improved from 53.65 ± 12.46 to 16.25 ± 8.76 (P < 0.05). According to the modified Macnab criteria, 5 patients (55.6%) were rated excellent, 3 patients (33.3%) were rated good, and 1 patient (11.1%) was rated fair at final follow-up, with an overall excellent and good rate of 88.9%. There were no serious complications during follow-up. Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery could be a safe, minimally invasive surgical treatment for discal cyst, particularly suitable for patients who cannot undergo general anesthesia.

Preoperative Mental Health Component Scoring Is Related to Patient Reported Outcomes Following Lumbar Fusion.

Retrospective cohort review. The objective of this study was to identify depression using the Mental Component Score (MCS-12) of the Short Form-12 (SF-12) survey and to correlate with patient outcomes. The impact of preexisting depressive symptoms on health-care related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes following lumbar spine fusion is not well understood. Patients undergoing lumbar fusion between one to three levels at a single center, academic hospital were retrospectively identified. Patients under the age of 18 years and those undergoing surgery for infection, trauma, tumor, or revision, and less than 1-year follow-up were excluded. Patients with depressive symptoms were identified using an existing clinical diagnosis or a score of MCS-12 less than or equal to 45.6 on the preoperative SF-12 survey. Absolute HRQOL scores, the recovery ratio (RR) and the percent of patients achieving minimum clinically important difference (MCID) between groups were compared, and a multiple linear regression analysis was performed. A total of 391 patients were included in the total cohort, with 123 (31.5%) patients reporting symptoms of depression based on MCS-12 and 268 (68.5%) without these symptoms. The low MCS-12 group was found to have significantly worse preoperative Oswestry disability index (ODI), visual analogue scale back pain (VAS Back) and visual analogue scale leg pain (VAS Leg) scores, and postoperative SF-12 physical component score (PCS-12), ODI, VAS Back, and VAS Leg pain scores (P < 0.05) than the non-depressed group. Finally, multiple linear regression analysis revealed preoperative depression to be a significant predictor of worse outcomes after lumbar fusion. Patients with depressive symptoms, identified with an MCS-12 cutoff below 45.6, were found to have significantly greater disability in a variety of HRQOL domains at baseline and postoperative measurement, and demonstrated less improvement in all outcome domains included in the analysis compared with patients without depression. However, while the improvement was less, even the low MCS-12 cohort demonstrated statistically significant improvement in all HRQOL outcome measures after surgery. 3.

Revision decompression with fusion as a treatment for same level restenosis after laminotomy for lumbar spinal stenosis

Background/Purpose: Laminotomy is an established procedure to relieve symptoms of lumbar spinal stenosis. However, there is a group of patients with symptomatic recurrence. Re-decompression and fusion could be an effective salvage procedure but the results are seldom found in the literature. In this study, we focused on investigating the clinical outcomes and complication rates of revision decompression with fusion in this patient group. Methods: A retrospective study including patients who had undergone revision decompression with fusion for recurrent symptoms due to same level restenosis after primary laminotomy for lumbar spinal stenosis was performed. Patients with recurrent symptoms due to prolapsed intervertebral disc, trauma, infection, and neoplasm were excluded. Demographics, clinical outcomes, and complications were retrieved. Results: Twenty-eight patients with a total number of 42 levels of revision decompression and fusion were included. With a mean follow-up time of 27 months after revision surgery, there were statistically significant improvement of 63, 49, and 13% in Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, visual analog scale for leg pain, and Roland-Morris disability questionnaire score, respectively. There were 6(21%), 2(7%), 0(0%), and 2(7%) cases of dural tear, infection requiring reoperation, new neurological deficit, and other complications, respectively, in these revision cases. Conclusion: Bearing potential complications in mind, re-decompression with fusion is a viable option with reasonable clinical outcomes for patients with recurrent symptoms after laminotomy for lumbar spinal stenosis. As a treatment option for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis, primary laminotomy could have the potential benefit of lower complication rates in revision surgery.