Anal Cytology Research Articles

Utilization of anal cytology screening among sexual and gender minority populations in Pennsylvania.

Despite the risk of anal cancer in sexual and gender minority populations (SGM), anal cancer screening remains infrequent and inconsistent in these populations. The objective of this analysis was to identify factors associated with anal cancer screenings among sexual and gender minority populations (SGM) using the Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use. Secondary analyses of two cross-sectional surveys from the 2020 (N=1125) and 2022 (N=630) "Pennsylvania LGBTQ Health Needs Assessment." Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to identify correlates of anal cytology screening. Average age was 37.7 (SD=13.3) and 39.7 (SD=13.6) in 2020 and 2022, respectively. Approximately 16-18% reported living with HIV. A minority of respondents reported past year screening (14.0% 2020 and 13.6% 2022). Enabling and need-based factors consistently associated with screening included STI treatment, living with HIV, PrEP use, and multiple sex partners. Robust factors associated with ever being screened were age and living with HIV. Anal cytology screening is being done in Pennsylvania at a small but not insignificant rate. In accordance with existing guidelines, SGM living with HIV were most likely to be screened, but still at a low rate. Predictive factors associated with screening in this study can inform future interventions to implement guideline-specific anal cancer prevention. Factors that reflect consistent connection to healthcare are associated with increased rates of screening via anal cytology testing, indicating there are opportunities to implement anal cancer screening as part of a larger, more comprehensive SGM-focused care pathway.

Prevalence of anal high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) types in people living with HIV and a history of cancer.

Referral tertiary care hospital for adult patients with cancer. We reviewed data of patients from the AIDS Cancer Clinic on antiretroviral therapy in chronic control who were consecutively referred for high-resolution anoscopy (HRA), where they underwent anal evaluation, collection of specimens for anal cytology and anal human papillomavirus (HPV) followed by HRA with directed biopsy if needed. A total of 155 patients were included; 149 (96.1%) were men, all of them men who have sex with men (MSM); the median age was 39 (IQR 32-47) years; 105 (67.7%) with Kaposi sarcoma, 40 (25.8%) with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and 10 (6.4%) with other neoplasms; only 7 (4.5%) had active cancer. The prevalence of HR-HPV infection was 89% (n=138) (95% CI 83-93) with at least one HR-HPV infection, and 62% (96) had coinfection with at least two types; the median HR-HPV types of coinfection were 3 (IQR 2-4). The number of patients infected with HPV 16 was 64 (41.3%, 95% CI 33.8-49.3), HPV 18 was 74 (47.7%, 95% CI 39.9-55.7) and with both 35 (22.6%). Some 59 patients (38%) had high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) and 49 (31.6%) had low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL). The prevalence of HR-HPV and HSIL among patients aged ≤35 and >35 years was the same. In this cohort of PLWHIV with a history of malignancy we found a high prevalence of HR-HPV 16 and 18 and anal HSIL, even in persons aged ≤35 years. These data highlight the importance of anal cancer screening in PLWHIV and history of malignancy.

ANAL CANCER SCREENING PRACTICES AMONG HIGHER-RISK POPULATIONS IN AN ACADEMIC MEDICAL SYSTEM.

While some experts recommend anal cancer screening for disproportionally affected populations including people living with HIV (PWH), condyloma acuminata, human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated gynecologic dysplasia and cancers, and solid organ transplants, actual screening practices remain understudied. Our objective was to characterize anal cancer screening practices among higher-risk populations in an academic medical system with access to high-resolution anoscopy (HRA). We extracted outpatient clinical data for the above populations from 01/01/2015 - 08/01/2022 at three sites of an academic medical system. Data included patients' demographics, medical comorbidities, and anal cytology and HPV testing results. We used chi-squared tests and logistic regression to assess for associations between patient characteristics and anal cancer screening. Of 7654 patients, 6.3% received anal cytology screening at least once including 21.7% of PWH, 13.8% of people with condyloma acuminata, 1.1% of people with gynecologic cancers, and 0.5% of people with solid organ transplants. In multivariable analysis, Black patients were 46% less likely to receive screening than white patients (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40-0.71), and cisgender women were 73% less likely to receive screening than cisgender men (95% CI 0.20-0.38). Of 485 individuals who received anal cytology screening, 37.5% were only screened once and 70.5% had abnormal cytology on one or more screenings. Only one-fifth of PWH received anal cancer screening and other higher-risk populations had even lower screening rates. Black patients and women were also less likely to be screened. Strategies to improve equitable screening practices for anal cancer are needed.

The role of nurses in the prevention of anal cancer in HIV-infected men having sex with men - a focus on papillomavirus vaccination and anal cytology screening.

Anal cancer is a common disease in men who have sex with men (MSM) with HIV infection and is associated with human papilloma virus (HPV) infection, which is very prevalent in this population. Advanced anal cancer has an aggressive treatment, with a high risk of producing an impaired quality of life. In cases of late diagnosis, mortality remains elevated. Based on these findings, it is a priority to carry out a systematic screening to detect earlier and prevent the disease. In this review and based in our experience at the Infectious Diseases outclinic at Hospital de la Santa Creu and Sant Pau in Barcelona, Spain, we propose a series of actions carried out by trained nurses. We recommend a coordinated set of multidisciplinary activities on HIV + MSM focused on HPV immunization and periodic anal cytology screening. A good implementation of the program will provide significant benefits, since at this time, the best care for anal cancer relies in HPV prevention and early diagnosis of HPV oncogenic lesions.

Anal Cytology Interpretation Issues: Observations from the College of American Pathologists’ Nongynecologic Cytology Program

Anal Cytology Interpretation Issues: Observations from the College of American Pathologists’ Nongynecologic Cytology Program

Retrospective Analysis of the Anal Cytology with Concurrent HR-HPV (High-Risk Human Papilloma Virus) Testing in a High-Risk Population in a Tertiary Care Center

Retrospective Analysis of the Anal Cytology with Concurrent HR-HPV (High-Risk Human Papilloma Virus) Testing in a High-Risk Population in a Tertiary Care Center

Anal high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer in women living with HIV and HIV-negative women with other risk factors.

To determine the prevalence and the risk factors for anal high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and anal cancer (HSIL+) in women living with HIV (WLWHIV), and to compare them to HIV-negative women with other risk factors. Prospective cohort study. WLWHIV and HIV-negative women with other risk factors were included. Screening for anal HSIL+ using anal cytology and HPV testing was performed. A high-resolution anoscopy with directed biopsy was also performed in patients with an abnormal cytology result or a positive HPV testing for high-risk (HR) genotypes, and in those with anal symptoms. The period prevalence of anal HR-HPV infection and histological HSIL was 57.9% and 10.9% among WLWHIV, and 60.8% and 9.2% among HIV-negative women. The prevalence of anal HPV 18 infection was higher in WLWHIV. The risk factors for anal HSIL+ in WLWHIV included anal HPV 16, other HR genotypes and low-risk genotypes infection, as well as a history of vulvar HSIL+. In HIV-negative women, the risk factors included anal HPV 16 infection, history of anogenital warts and of vulvar HSIL+, and immunosuppressive treatment. A high prevalence of anal HPV infection and HSIL was observed in WLWHIV and women with other risk factors. Both groups share anal HPV 16 infection and history of vulvar HSIL+ as risk factors for the development of anal HSIL+. Genotyping for anal HPV 16 may help identify women at higher risk of anal cancer.

Safety and Immunogenicity of the Nonavalent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine in Women Living with HIV.

The objectives were to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the nonavalent human papillomavirus (nHPV) vaccine in adult Spanish women living with HIV (WLHIV); the prevalence of anal and cervical dysplasia and nHPV vaccine genotypes in the anus and cervix; and risk factors for high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) infection in anal mucosa. In this single-center, open-arm, non-randomized clinical trial, the nHPV vaccine was administered at 0, 2, and 6 months to WLHIV enrolled between February 2020 and November 2023, measuring vaccine antibody titers pre-vaccination and at 2, 6, and 7 months after the first dose. Cervical and anal cytology and HPV PCR genotyping studies were performed. Women with abnormal cytology and/or anal or cervical HPV infection at baseline underwent high-resolution anoscopy and/or colposcopy. A total of 122 participants were included with mean age of 49.6 years: 52.5% smoked; 10.7% had anal-genital condylomatosis; 38.5% were infected by HR-HPV in the anus and 25.4% in the cervix, most frequently HPV 16; 19.1% had anal intraepithelial neoplasia 1-(AIN1); and 3.1% had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1 and 2 (CIN1/CIN2). Vaccine administration did not modify viral-immunological status (CD4 [809 ± 226.8 cells/uL vs. 792.35 ± 349.95; p = 0.357]) or plasma HIV load (3.38 ± 4.41 vs. 1.62 ± 2.55 cop/uL [log]; p = 0.125). Anti-HPV antibodies ([IQR: 0-0] vs. 7.63 nm [IQR: 3.46-19.7]; p = 0.0001) and seroconversion rate (8.2% vs. 96.7% [p = 0.0001]) were increased at 7 versus 0 months. There were no severe vaccine-related adverse reactions; injection-site pain was reported by around half of the participants. HR-HPV infection in the anus was solely associated with a concomitant cervix infection (HR 5.027; 95% CI: 1.009-25.042). nHPV vaccine in adult WLHIV is immunogenic and safe.

Concomitant Cervical and Anal Screening for Human Papillomavirus (HPV) – Worth the effort or waste of time?

Abstract Background Human papilloma virus (HPV) infection represents the most common sexually transmitted disease and a major risk factor for disease progression to anal cancer. Aims This study aimed to analyze the rate of concomitant anal dysplasia in a prospectively surveilled cohort of sexually active women. Methods This study represents a follow-up analysis of the AnusGynecology (ANGY) study (doi.org/10.3390/cancers14205096). This prospective, cross-sectional single-center study recruited women for concomitant cervical and anal screening of HPV genotypes and cytology during a single appointment. Cervical / anal smears +/- biopsies if deemed necessary were performed by board-certified specialists during a single outpatient visit. All women with findings of either HPV or any type of dysplastic lesions on anal smears were offered follow-up in a specialized high-resolution anoscopy (HRA) outpatient clinic. Results Overall, 275 patients (mean age 42±12) were included. Among them, 102 (37%) had cervical high risk (HR)-HPV. Anal smear cytology was performed in 255 patients (93%), while 19 patients (7%) underwent anal biopsy during the combined visit. In total, HPV was (incidentally) revealed in 91 patients (33%) on anal smears, while any degree of anal dysplasia was found in 30 patients (11%), 6 if which were high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (H-SIL). Furthermore, 10 out of 19 biopsies were positive (3 H-SIL lesions). Only half (48/93, 52%) of women agreed to undergo the recommended specialized follow-up evaluation. Of them, 18 (38%) were diagnosed with dysplastic lesions (9 L-SIL and H-SIL, respectively) on biopsies, while the remaining visits revealed no abnormalities. Conclusion The present study revealed a significant number of dysplastic lesions in women willing to undergo specialized proctologic evaluation after abnormal findings on initial screening. Close follow-up of these women is hence strongly recommended.

The influence of home versus clinic anal human papillomavirus sampling on high-resolution anoscopy uptake in the Prevent Anal Cancer Self-Swab Study.

Background Anal cancer disproportionately affects sexual and gender minority individuals living with HIV. High-resolution anoscopy (HRA) is an in-clinic procedure to detect precancerous anal lesions and cancer, yet prospective data on factors associated with HRA attendance are lacking. We examined whether anal HPV sampling at home versus in a clinic impacts HRA uptake and assessed HRA acceptability. Methods Sexual and gender minority individuals were randomised to home-based self-sampling or clinical sampling. All were asked to attend in-clinic HRA 1year later. We regressed HRA attendance on study arm using multivariable Poisson regression and assessed HRA acceptability using χ 2 tests. Results A total of 62.8% of 196 participants who engaged in screening attended HRA. Although not significant (P =0.13), a higher proportion of participants who engaged in clinic-based screening attended HRA (68.5%) compared to home-based participants (57.9%). Overall, HRA uptake was higher among participants with anal cytology history (aRR 1.40, 95% CI 1.07-1.82), and lower among participants preferring a versatile anal sex position versus insertive (aRR 0.70, 95% CI 0.53-0.91), but did not differ by race or HIV serostatus. In the clinic arm, persons living with HIV had lower HRA attendance (42.9%) versus HIV-negative participants (73.3%) (P =0.02) and Black non-Hispanic participants had lower HRA attendance (41.7%) than White non-Hispanic participants (73.1%), (P =0.04). No differences in attendance by race or HIV status were observed in the home arm. Conclusions HRA uptake differed significantly by race and HIV status in the clinic arm but not the home arm.

Prevalence of anal cytology screening among persons with HIV and lack of access to high-resolution anoscopy at HIV care facilities.

People with HIV at highest risk of anal cancer include gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men and transgender women aged 35 years or older as well as other people with HIV aged 45 years or older. Identifying and treating precancerous lesions can reduce anal cancer incidence in these groups. We assessed the prevalence of anal cytology and access to high-resolution anoscopy among people with HIV overall and in those individuals at highest risk. Data were obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Medical Monitoring Project, a population-based survey of people with HIV aged 18 years and older, and a supplemental Medical Monitoring Project facility survey. We report weighted percentages of people with HIV receiving anal cytology during the past 12 months, access to high-resolution anoscopy, and characteristics of HIV care facilities by availability of high-resolution anoscopy. Overall, 4.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.4% to 6.1%) of people with HIV had undergone anal cytology in the prior 12 months. Only 7.7% (95% CI = 5.1% to 10.6%) of gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men as well as transgender women 35 years of age or older and 1.9% (95% CI = 0.9% to 2.9%) of all other people with HIV aged 45 years and older had anal cytology. Prevalence was statistically significantly low among people with HIV with the following characteristics: non-Hispanic or Latino, Black or African American, high school education or less, heterosexual orientation, and living in southern Medical Monitoring Project states. Among people with HIV, 32.8% (95% CI = 28.0% to 37.7%) had no access to high-resolution anoscopy on-site or through referral at their care facility; 22.2% (95% CI = 19.5% to 24.9%) had on-site access; 45.0% (95% CI = 41.5% to 48.5%) had high-resolution anoscopy available through referral. Most facilities that received Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program funding, cared for more than 1000 people with HIV, or provided on-site colposcopy also provided high-resolution anoscopy on-site or through referral. Rates of anal cytology and access to high-resolution anoscopy were low among people with HIV, including those individuals at highest risk of anal cancer. Our data may inform large-scale implementation of anal cancer prevention efforts.

Evaluation of dual p16/Ki-67 immunostaining on anal cytology specimens.

Dual immunostaining for p16/Ki67 is FDA-approved for use on liquid-based cervical cytology specimens; however, the utility of dual staining in anal cytology especially for ASCUS risk stratification is not well established. We investigated dual staining performance on anal cytology specimens and correlated with subsequent cytologic interpretation, high-risk HPV status, and anal biopsy results. Dual staining for p16/Ki-67 was performed on all liquid-based anal cytology specimens from December 2021 to June 2022 (n = 43). Three patients had high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL/AIN2-3) on biopsy; dual staining was positive in all three cases. All HR-HPV negative cases were negative for dual staining. Among the 12 ASCUS samples with subsequent anal biopsy results all also had HR-HPV testing. Due to small sample size of cases with squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) diagnosed on biopsy, the sensitivity and positive predictive value was not calculated. However, the specificity and negative predictive value of p16/Ki-67 dual staining for SIL of any grade on biopsy were 1 (95% CI: 0.66-1) and 0.9 (95% CI: 0.65-0.97) respectively, whereas the specificity and negative predictive value of HR-HPV testing for SIL of any grade on biopsy were 0.44 (95% CI: 0.14-0.79) and 0.8 (95% CI: 0.41-0.96) respectively. Dual p16/Ki-67 staining indicates transforming HPV infection and could help serve as an ancillary test for risk stratification for atypical anal cytology specimens. Among ASCUS samples, dual staining was specific for SIL of any grade with a high negative predictive value and therefore could be useful in clinical practices with limited availability for follow-up care.

EPR24-116: Improving Anal Cancer Screening: A Comparative Analysis of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Tests, Alone or in Combination With Anal Cytology Assays, to Predict High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions.

EPR24-116: Improving Anal Cancer Screening: A Comparative Analysis of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Tests, Alone or in Combination With Anal Cytology Assays, to Predict High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions.

Clinical Predictors and Outcomes of Invasive Anal Cancer for People With HIV in an Inception Cohort.

Due to the heterogeneity of risk for invasive anal cancer (IAC) among people with human immunodeficiency virus (PWH), we investigated predictors of IAC and described outcomes among those with a cancer diagnosis. Using a longitudinal inception cohort of anal cancer screening, we evaluated risk factors and outcome probabilities for incident IAC in Cox models. Screening included anal cytology and digital anorectal examination, and, if results of either were abnormal, high-resolution anoscopy. Between 30 November 2006 and 3 March 2021, a total of 8139 PWH received care at the University of California, San Diego, with 4105 individuals undergoing screening and subsequently followed up over a median of 5.5 years. Anal cancer developed in 33 of them. IAC was more likely to develop in patients with anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (aHSILs) on initial or subsequent follow-up cytology (hazard ratio, 4.54) and a nadir CD4 cell count ≤200/µL (2.99). The joint effect of aHSILs and nadir CD4 cell count ≤200/µL amplified the hazard of IAC by 9-fold compared with the absence of both. PWH with time-updated cytology aHSIL and CD4 cell counts ≤200/µL had 5- and 10-year probabilities of IAC of 3.40% and 4.27%, respectively. Twelve individuals with cancer died, 7 (21% of the total 33) due to cancer progression, and they had clinical stage IIIA or higher cancer at initial diagnosis. PWH with both aHSIL and a nadir CD4 cell count ≤200/µL have the highest risk of IAC. PWH who died due to IAC progression had clinical stage IIIA cancer or higher at diagnosis, highlighting the importance of early diagnosis through high-resolution anoscopic screening.

Interobserver agreement in the interpretation of anal cytology.

Anal cytology represents a tool for anal cancer screening in high-risk populations. In addition to accuracy, the reproducibility of the interpretation is of key importance. The authors evaluated the agreement of anal cytologic interpretation between two cytopathologists. Liquid-based cytologic slides from human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-negative men who have sex with men (MSM) were evaluated by two readers with at least 10 years of expertise in cervical cytology. Cases with a discordant interpretation were reviewed, and a consensus was reached. Human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping was performed using a proprietary HPV genotyping test. Unweighted and weighted Cohen kappa and 95% confidence interval (CI) values were calculated. Overall, 713 slides that were adequate for interpretation were evaluated (MSM: median age, 33 years). An HPV test was performed on 620 samples (87.0%). Considering a dichotomous interpretation (negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy vs. atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or worse), the crude agreement between the two readers was 93.3% (kappa=0.82; 95% CI, 0.77-0.87). Once a consensus for discordant cases was reached, the best agreement was found for the negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy category (511 of 528 samples; 96.8%), whereas the atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance category showed the lowest agreement (90 of 117 samples, 76.9%). Considering the individual cytologic categories, overall agreement was 92.1% (kappa=0.85; 95% CI, 0.81-0.89). The discordant interpretations were not associated with high-risk HPV infection, HPV16 infection, or MSM age. The results indicating excellent interobserver agreement in this study substantiate the use of anal cytology in the setting of human immunodeficiency virus-negative MSM.

Incidence and clearance of cervical and anal high-risk human papillomavirus in kidney transplant recipients: Results from a Danish prospective clinical study

This study investigates the incidence and clearance of cervical and anal high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) infection in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) compared to immunocompetent controls. During 2016-2017, we enrolled 125 female KTRs and 125 female controls. Liquid-based cervical and anal cytology samples collected at enrollment and follow-up were tested for human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA using the CLART HPV2 test. All participants answered a questionnaire on lifestyle and sexual behavior at both examinations. KTRs had an increased age-adjusted risk of incident cervical hrHPV infection compared to controls (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.6, 95% CI = 1.2-11.2). Probability of cervical hrHPV clearance at 18 months was lower among KTRs (8.3%) than controls (66.7%). There was no statistically significant difference in anal hrHPV incidence between KTRs and controls (HR = 0.9, 95% CI = 0.4-2.0). Clearance of anal hrHPV was similar between KTRs and controls at 18 months. During the total follow-up, a lower anal hrHPV clearance, although not statistically significant, was observed among KTRs (HR = 0.3, 95% CI = 0.06-1.2). KTRs had higher incidence of cervical hrHPV and lower probability of clearance, especially of cervical hrHPV infections, than controls. Our findings support that KTRs are at increased risk of HPV infection and point to the need for targeted HPV prevention strategies, such as cervical cancer screening.

Access to High-Resolution Anoscopy Among Persons With HIV and Abnormal Anal Cytology Results

This cross-sectional study evaluates use and availability of follow-up anoscopy among persons at highest risk for anal cancer.

International Anal Neoplasia Society's consensus guidelines for anal cancer screening.

The International Anal Neoplasia Society (IANS) developed consensus guidelines to inform anal cancer screening use among various high-risk groups. Anal cancer incidence estimates by age among risk groups provided the basis to identify risk thresholds to recommend screening. Guided by risk thresholds, screening initiation at age 35 years was recommended for men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TW) with HIV. For other people with HIV and MSM and TW not with HIV, screening initiation at age 45 years was recommended. For solid organ transplant recipients, screening initiation beginning from 10 years post-transplant was recommended. For persons with a history of vulvar precancer or cancer, screening initiation was recommended starting within 1 year of diagnosis of vulvar precancer or cancer. Persons aged ≥45 years with a history of cervical/vaginal HSIL or cancer, perianal warts, persistent (>1 year) cervical HPV16, or autoimmune conditions could be considered for screening with shared decision-making, provided there is adequate capacity to perform diagnostic procedures (high-resolution anoscopy [HRA]). Anal cytology, high-risk (hr) human papillomavirus (HPV) testing (including genotyping for HPV16), and hrHPV-cytology co-testing are different strategies currently used for anal cancer screening that show acceptable performance. Thresholds for referral for HRA or follow-up screening tests are delineated. These recommendations from IANS provide the basis to inform management of abnormal screening results, considering currently available screening tools. These guidelines provide a pivotal foundation to help generate consensus among providers and inform the introduction and implementation of risk-targeted screening for anal cancer prevention.

2665. Health Care Provider Characteristics Associated with Anal Cancer Screening in an Academic Medical System

Abstract Background Anal cancer disproportionally affects persons living with HIV (PWH), sexual and gender minorities, and those with gynecologic cancers, condyloma acuminata, and solid organ transplantation. While expert guidance on anal cancer screening exists for PWH, there are no national guidelines for screening any of these populations. We analyzed clinician characteristics associated with anal cancer screening among providers who care for high-risk populations at an academic medical center including infectious disease (ID) specialists, primary care providers (PCPs), and obstetrician/gynecologists (OBGYNs). Methods We retrospectively reviewed medical charts for patients with HIV, gynecologic cancers, condyloma acuminata, solid organ transplantation, and sexual or gender minority status at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and two affiliated clinics from 01/01/2015 - 08/01/2022. We extracted provider specialties, clinic locations, patient panel demographics, and dates of anal cytology and human papillomavirus (HPV) screening tests. We used chi-squared tests to identify provider factors associated with screening. Results Of 1,093 providers, at least one anal cytology test was performed by 93.8% (75/80) of ID providers, 55.2% (376/681) of PCPs, 28.3% (41/145) of OBGYNs, and 24.1% (45/187) of other providers (p < 0.001); among screeners, anal HPV co-testing was performed equally across specialties (54.2%, p = 0.23). Providers were more likely to screen if they cared for PWH (91.8% with 10-49 PWH vs 3.7% for no PWH, p < 0.001), majority cis-men (55.2%, p=0.003), or majority publicly insured patients (51.8%, p < 0.001). Providers were less likely to screen if they cared for majority cis-women (40.9%, p< 0.001) or majority privately insured patients (24.0%, p< 0.001). Screening practices did not differ by the racial composition of providers’ patient panels (p=.21). Conclusion While many ID specialists performed anal cancer screenings, other providers were less likely to screen. Providers caring for many PWH, cis-men, or publicly insured patients were more likely to screen. Additional research is needed to clarify screening guidance and optimize screening practices for all higher-risk populations, especially non-PWH groups. Disclosures Douglas Krakower, MD, Gilead: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support|U. North Texas Health Sciences Center: Funding for mentoring|UAB: Advisor/Consultant|UpToDate, Inc.: Royalties|Virology Education: Honoraria

Cumulative Detection of Anal High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions Over 2-Year Follow-up in Men Who Have Sex With Men Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus in France.

We assessed cumulative detection and determinants of anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) in men who have sex with men living with human immunodeficiency virus and who underwent 3 visits over 2 years, with cytology and high-resolution anoscopy, within the ANRS-EP57-APACHES study. The cumulative HSIL detection rate was 33% (134 of 410), of which 48% HSILs were detected at baseline. HSIL detection varied considerably by center (from 13% to 51%). The strongest HSIL determinants were baseline human papillomavirus 16 (adjusted odds ratio, 8.2; 95% confidence interval, 3.6-18.9) and p16/Ki67 (4.6 [2.3-9.1]). Repeated annual cytology and high-resolution anoscopy improved HSIL detection but did not fully compensate for between-center heterogeneity.