Amphibians In Captivity Research Articles

Frog in the well: A review of the scientific literature for evidence of amphibian sentience

Millions of amphibians are traded annually around the world for the exotic pet industry. Their experience during both trade, and in captivity as pets, leads to numerous animal welfare issues. The poor welfare of many pet amphibians is due in part to poor attitudes and acceptance of amphibian species to suffer. Amphibians, like other vertebrate species, are sentient, which means that their feelings matter. In our study, we have sought to explore the scientific literature over 31 years (1990–2020), to establish what aspects of sentience are accepted and still being explored in amphibians. Our review aimed to; 1) assess the extent to which amphibian sentience features in a portion of the scientific literature, 2) to determine which aspects of sentience have been studied in amphibians, and in which species, and 3) to evaluate what this means in terms of their involvement and treatment in the global exotic pet trade. We used 42 keywords to define sentience and used these to search through four databases (ScienceDirect, BioOne, Ingenta Connect, and MDPI), and one open-access journal (PLOS ONE). We recorded studies that either explored or assumed sentience traits in amphibians. We found that amphibians were assumed to be capable of the following emotions and states; stress, pain, distress, suffering, fear, anxiety, excitement, altruism and arousal. The term ‘emotion’ was explored in amphibians with mixed results. Our results show that amphibians are known to feel and experience a range of sentience characteristics and traits and that these feelings are utilised and accepted in studies using amphibians as research models. There is, however, still much more to learn about amphibian sentience, particularly in regards to positive states and emotions, and this growing understanding could be used to make positive changes for the experiences of amphibians in captivity.

Mites and ticks of reptiles and amphibians in Brazil

This study focuses on the parasitic associations of mites and ticks infesting reptiles and amphibians through a multifocal approach. Herein, reptiles (n= 3,596) and amphibians (n= 919) were examined to ensure representativeness of the Brazilian herpetofauna megadiversity. The overall prevalence was calculated to better understand which were the preferred hosts for each order of Acari (Trombidiformes, Mesostigmata and Ixodida), as well as to determine which orders frequently parasitize reptiles and amphibians in Brazil, and their host specificity. Infestation rates were calculated [prevalence, mean intensity (MI) and mean abundance (MA)] for each order and species, determining which mites and ticks are more likely to be found parasitizing the ectothermic tetrapod fauna. Parasitic niches and preferred locations were recorded to help identify specific places exploited by different Acari, and to determine the host-parasite adaptations, specificity, and relationships in terms of co-evolution. In total 4,515 reptiles and amphibians were examined, of which 170 specimens were infested by mites and ticks (overall prevalence of 3.8%). Trombidiformes mites were prevalent in lizards (55.3%), followed by Ixodida on snakes (24.7%). Mesostigmata mites were the less prevalent, being identified only on Squamata reptiles (4.3% on snakes, 2.4% on lizards). In amphibians, Ixodida ticks were the most prevalent (63.2%), followed by Trombidiformes (34.6%), and lastly Oribatida (2%). From the 13 species of Trombidiformes identified, Eutrombicula alfreddugesi (19.9%) was the most abundant in terms of number of host species and infested individuals. Specimens of Ixodida, yet more common, showed low preferred locations and different values of infestation rates. Co-infestations were recorded only on snakes. Lizard mites generally adhered to the ventral celomatic area (Pterygosomatidae), and some species to the pocket-like structures (Trombiculidae). Lizards, at variance from snakes, have adapted to endure high parasitic loads with minimum effects on their health. The high number of mites recorded in the digits of toads (Cycloramphus boraceiensis, Corythomantis greening, Cycloramphus dubius, Leptodactylus latrans, Melanophryniscus admirabilis) could lead to avascular necrosis. Frogs were often infested by Hannemania larvae, while Rhinella toads were likely to be infested by Amblyomma ticks. Of note, Rhinella major toad was found infested by an oribatid mite, implying first a new parasitic relationship. The effect of high parasitic loads on critically endangered species of anurans deserves further investigation. Our results add basic knowledge to host association of mites and ticks to Brazilian reptiles and amphibians, highlighting that routine ectoparasite examination is needed in cases of quarantine as well as when for managing reptiles and amphibians in captivity given the wide diversity of Acari on the Brazilian ectothermic tetrapod fauna.

The relationship between spindly leg syndrome incidence and water composition, overfeeding, and diet in newly metamorphosed harlequin frogs (Atelopus spp.).

Spindly Leg Syndrome (SLS) is a persistent animal welfare issue associated with the rearing of amphibians in captivity. We conducted two experiments to investigate the effects of diet, water composition and overfeeding on prevalence of SLS in newly metamorphosed harlequin frogs (Atelopus spp.). In our first experiment, we offered 400 full-sibling tadpoles of Atelopus certus isocaloric diets in treatments of 31%, 37%, 42% and 48% crude protein respectively. Tadpoles fed higher protein diets metamorphosed faster, but the incidence of SLS exceeded 80% in all treatments leading to the conclusion that variation in dietary protein was not responsible for causing SLS. We used 720 full-sibling Atelopus glyphus tadpoles in a second experiment to examine the effects of diet type, water composition and diet ration on SLS. We found that an overall incidence of 58% spindly leg in tadpoles reared in tap water, but reduced to about 10% in water treated by reverse osmosis and then reconstituted. It is possible that the reverse osmosis treatment removed some factor that caused the SLS, or that the reconstitution may have added a mineral lacking in the original tap water. Within tap water treatments, overfeeding tadpoles in tanks increased the incidence of SLS. We recommend further experimental research into this condition to identify the causative factors in the water. Additional research into the nutritional composition of food available to wild tadpoles would be useful in formulating captive diets, that have to date been solely based on surrogate species.

Probiotic treatment restores protection against lethal fungal infection lost during amphibian captivity.

Host-associated microbiomes perform many beneficial functions including resisting pathogens and training the immune system. Here, we show that amphibians developing in captivity lose substantial skin bacterial diversity, primarily due to reduced ongoing input from environmental sources. We combined studies of wild and captive amphibians with a database of over 1 000 strains that allows us to examine antifungal function of the skin microbiome. We tracked skin bacterial communities of 62 endangered boreal toads, Anaxyrus boreas, across 18 time points, four probiotic treatments, and two exposures to the lethal fungal pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) in captivity, and compared these to 33 samples collected from wild populations at the same life stage. As the amphibians in captivity lost the Bd-inhibitory bacteria through time, the proportion of individuals exposed to Bd that became infected rose from 33% to 100% in subsequent exposures. Inoculations of the Bd-inhibitory probiotic Janthinobacterium lividum resulted in a 40% increase in survival during the second Bd challenge, indicating that the effect of microbiome depletion was reversible by restoring Bd-inhibitory bacteria. Taken together, this study highlights the functional role of ongoing environmental inputs of skin-associated bacteria in mitigating a devastating amphibian pathogen, and that long-term captivity decreases this defensive function.

How much UVB does my reptile need? The UV-Tool, a guide to the selection of UV lighting for reptiles and amphibians in captivity.

Guidance is almost non-existent as to suitable levels of UV lighting for reptiles and amphibians, or how to achieve satisfactory UV gradients using artificial lighting. The UV-Tool is a working document that seeks to address this problem, by considering the range of UV experienced by each species in the wild. The UV-Tool contains an editable and expanding database of the microhabitat requirements and basking behaviour of reptile and amphibian species, as derived from field studies, or inferred from observed behaviour in captivity. Since an animal’s UV-B exposure is determined by its behaviour within its native microhabitat, estimation of its natural range of daily UV-B exposure is then possible. The current version of the UV-Tool assigns 254 species to each of four ‘zones’ of UV-B exposure (Ferguson zones) based upon UV-index measurements. Once the likely UV requirement of any species of reptile or amphibian is ascertained, the next step is to plan safe but effective UV gradients within the captive environment. To do this requires knowledge of the UV spectrum and output of the lamps to be used. The UV-Tool therefore includes test reports and UV-index gradient maps for commercially available UV-B lighting products, and a guide to selection of appropriate lamps for use in vivaria and in larger zoo enclosures. There are reports on 24 different products in the current version of the UV-Tool. This document has been compiled by members of the British and Irish Association of Zoos and Aquaria (BIAZA) Reptile and Amphibian Working Group (RAWG) with contributions from zookeepers and herpetologists from the UK and abroad. Further input is welcome and encouraged.

Meeting ultraviolet B radiation requirements of amphibians in captivity: a case study with mountain chicken frogs (Leptodactylus fallax) and general recommendations for pre-release health screening.

Conservation breeding programmes are a tool used to prevent amphibian extinctions. The husbandry requirements of amphibians are complex. Ongoing research is needed to ensure optimal management of those captive-bred animals destined, in particular, for reintroduction. The UV-B and vitamin D3 requirements of amphibians are largely unknown. Metabolic bone disease has been reported in a number of species. These include the Critically Endangered mountain chicken frog (Leptodactylus fallax) reared in captivity on diets supplemented with a high-calcium multivitamin and mineral supplement containing vitamin D3 but without UV-B provision. Captive-bred L. fallax being reared for reintroduction to Montserrat were provided with UV-B radiation from metamorphosis and were fed on insects supplemented with vitamins and minerals. Overlapping heat, light and UV-B gradients were provided, mimicking what we believe best represents the natural situation and thereby facilitated self-regulation of UV-B exposure. A subset of 10 frogs was periodically radiographed to assess skeletal health. Radiographic bone density and anatomical integrity appeared unremarkable when compared with a wild caught L. fallax. In addition to other routine health-screening, we recommend that radiography be performed to a structured schedule on a subset of all captive-bred and reared amphibians to assess skeletal health and to gauge the appropriateness of captive husbandry. We demonstrate here that, through the appropriate provision of a combination of both UV-B radiation and dietary supplementation, L. fallax can be bred and reared in captivity with healthy skeletal development.

Animal Welfare Decisions in a Triage Situation: Amphibian Rescue

Providing suitable environments for amphibians in captivity can sometimes be difficult to achieve. One key element of a suitable environment is proper substrate. Appropriate substrate encourages na...

Laboratory tests of antifungal agents to treat tadpoles against the pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis

The fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd), which is the etiological agent of the disease chytridiomycosis, is threatening both wild and captive amphibians. While there are some methods of treating amphibians in captivity, no method has yet been shown to be a promising treatment for amphibian populations in natural habitats. Here we present the results of a laboratory experiment in which we tested 2 antifungal agents that might be used to treat amphibians in the field. As a first step towards the goal of developing mitigation methods, we tested the efficiency of these agents in reducing Bd prevalence and loads (zoospore counts) in the laboratory. We exposed naturally infected tadpoles of the midwife toad Alytes obstetricans to different concentrations of the antifungal agents for 7 d. We found that Virkon Aquatic® affected neither Bd prevalence nor loads. At 0.625 ml l-1 of General Tonic®, prevalence was reduced to 60%, and infected animals had greatly reduced burdens. However, tadpole length was reduced by 19% and mass by 32% on average compared to the control group, suggesting a negative effect on fitness. Tadpole survival was not affected at 0.625 ml l-1 or 1.25 ml l-1, but was reduced to 60% at 2.5 ml l-1. Keeping animals in a dilution of General Tonic® for 7 d at a concentration of 0.625 ml l-1 might be an easy way to reduce zoospore counts in large numbers of animals at relatively low cost.

A brighter future for frogs? The influence of carotenoids on the health, development and reproductive success of the red‐eye tree frog

AbstractEx situ conservation is an important tool for the prevention of species extinction in amphibians. Currently, there is limited information on the nutritional requirements of amphibians in captivity, and there have been anecdotal reports of skin colour degradation in captive amphibians. Amphibians use carotenoids for skin pigmentation, and because carotenoids are only obtainable through the diet, colour degradation could result from limited carotenoid availability. Studies of other vertebrate taxa have shown that carotenoids contribute to health and reproductive success; however, their importance to amphibians is currently unknown. We assessed the influence of carotenoids on the health and development of red‐eye tree frogs (Agalychnis callidryas) during larval and post‐metamorphic stages, and looked at effects on skin colour and reproductive success. Carry‐over effects of larval exposure to carotenoids were also investigated, and the effects of carotenoids on skin colour development and degradation in adulthood were examined. Carotenoids did not significantly influence larval growth or survival; however, post‐metamorphic carotenoid availability significantly increased growth rate in female but not in male frogs. Frogs fed a carotenoid diet post‐metamorphosis had significantly redder skin than controls, and larval carotenoid exposure significantly influenced post‐metamorphic skin colour. Fecundity was significantly higher in female frogs raised on a carotenoid diet post‐metamorphosis compared with controls. Finally, skin colour did not change in adulthood despite changes in dietary carotenoid availability, which suggests that there is a critical period during post‐metamorphic growth for deposition of carotenoids in the skin. We have shown that carotenoids influence the development, phenotype and reproductive success of A. callidryas, and these important nutrients should therefore be considered when nutritional recommendations for amphibians are made.

Can carotenoids mediate the potentially harmful effects of ultraviolet light in Silurana (Xenopus) tropicalis larvae?

Amphibians have recently experienced unprecedented declines in the wild, the causes of which are often difficult to mitigate. This has increased the importance of ex situ conservation; however, long-term maintenance and breeding of amphibians in captivity often has limited success. In vertebrates, vitamin D is required for calcium homeostasis and is produced endogenously in skin exposed to ultraviolet (UV) light; however, UV light can be harmful to amphibians in some instances. Carotenoids are dietary pigments that may provide protection from UV light. The aim of this study was to assess the protective capability of carotenoids against the potentially harmful effects of UV light in Silurana (=Xenopus) tropicalis larvae raised in an enhanced or limited UV environment. Tadpole survival and the size and developmental stage reached by the end of the study period were measured. Carotenoids had a significantly positive effect on developmental rate in both UV-limited and UV-enhanced environments. Larvae in an enhanced UV environment were significantly larger than those raised under a limited UV environment, irrespective of diet. Carotenoid-fed larvae tended to have increased survival in relation to those raised without carotenoids, but only in a limited UV environment. Carotenoids appear to provide little protection against UV light in this case. The role of carotenoids in amphibian health has not previously been studied. We show that carotenoid availability significantly influences development and may increase survival in S.(X.) tropicalis larvae. This finding may have important implications for recommendations made on the nutrition of amphibians in captivity.

Developing a safe antifungal treatment protocol to eliminateBatrachochytrium dendrobatidisfrom amphibians

Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis is one of the most pathogenic microorganisms affecting amphibians in both captivity and in nature. The establishment of B. dendrobatidis free, stable, amphibian captive breeding colonies is one of the emergency measures that is being taken to save threatened amphibian species from extinction. For this purpose, in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing and the development of efficient and safe treatment protocols are required. In this study, we evaluated the use of amphotericin B and voriconazole to treat chytridiomycosis in amphibians. The concentration at which the growth of five tested B. dendrobatidis strains was inhibited was 0.8 μg/ml for amphotericin B and 0.0125 μg/ml for voriconazole. To completely eliminate a mixture of sporangia and zoospores of strain IA042 required 48 h of exposure to 8 μg/ml of amphotericin B or 10 days to 1.25 μg/ml of voriconazole. Zoospores were killed within 0.5 h by 0.8 μg/ml of amphotericin B, but even after 24 h exposure to 1.25 μg/ml of voriconazole they remained viable. Amphotericin B was acutely toxic for Alytes muletensis tadpoles at 8 μg/ml, whereas toxic side effects were not noticed during a seven-day exposure to voriconazole at concentrations as high as 12.5 μg/ml. The voriconazole concentrations remained stable in water during this exposure period. On the basis of this data, experimentally inoculated postmetamorphic Alytes cisternasii were sprayed once daily for 7 days with a 1.25 μg/ml solution of voriconazole in water which eliminated the B. dendrobatidis infection from all treated animals. Finally, treatment of a naturally infected colony of poison dart frogs (Dendrobatidae) using this protocol, combined with environmental disinfection, cleared the infection from the colony.

Amphibian water quality: approaches to an essential environmental parameter

Appropriate water quality is essential for maintaining and breeding amphibians in captivity. Aquatic systems that maintain water quality have been employed for many years in the aquaculture and aquarium industries. These techniques are now more commonly being utilized for amphibians. Using information from the work of the authors and published literature on amphibians and fish, benchmarks are provided for common water‐quality parameters for amphibians.

Basic Husbandry and Clinical Assessment of the Amphibian Patient

The veterinarian presented with an amphibian patient must be prepared to assess both the animal's medical condition and its husbandry record; good health is inextricably linked to proper care and diet. This article provides the clinician with guidelines for maintaining amphibians in captivity, including information on climate control and lighting, housing and cage enrichment, and nutrition. The article also covers questions to ask when taking a history, methods of restraint, and practical advice on the equipment and techniques used to conduct a complete physical examination of the amphibian patient.

Reptiles and Amphibians in Captivity: Breeding, Longevity, and Inventory, Current January 1, 1994

Reptiles and Amphibians in Captivity: Breeding, Longevity, and Inventory, Current January 1, 1994

The Inventory of Live Reptiles and Amphibians in Captivity: a brief history

The Inventory of Live Reptiles and Amphibians in Captivity: a brief history

Mattison, C. (1987): The care of reptiles and amphibians in captivity. Revised edition, 1-317, figs. 1-72, colour plates 1-48. £ 12.95 (US $ 22.50). Blandford Press, Link House, West Street, Poole, Dorset BH 15 1 LL, England

Mattison, C. (1987): The care of reptiles and amphibians in captivity. Revised edition, 1-317, figs. 1-72, colour plates 1-48. £ 12.95 (US $ 22.50). Blandford Press, Link House, West Street, Poole, Dorset BH 15 1 LL, England

The Inventory of Live Reptiles and Amphibians in Captivity: a brief history

The Inventory of Live Reptiles and Amphibians in Captivity: a brief history

The Care of Reptiles and Amphibians in Captivity.Christopher Mattison

Previous articleNext article No AccessNew Biological BooksThe Care of Reptiles and Amphibians in Captivity. Christopher Mattison Elliott JacobsonElliott Jacobson Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Quarterly Review of Biology Volume 58, Number 3Sep., 1983 Published in association with Stony Brook University Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/413463 Views: 1Total views on this site Copyright 1983 Stony Brook Foundation, Inc.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.

Breeding amphibians in captivity

Breeding amphibians in captivity

Notes on keeping arboreal and terrestrial amphibians in captivity

International Zoo YearbookVolume 9, Issue 1 p. 14-16 Notes on keeping arboreal and terrestrial amphibians in captivity THOMAS JORDAN, THOMAS JORDAN Dallas Zoo, Dallas, Texas, USASearch for more papers by this author THOMAS JORDAN, THOMAS JORDAN Dallas Zoo, Dallas, Texas, USASearch for more papers by this author First published: January 1969 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1090.1969.tb02585.xCitations: 1AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat Citing Literature Volume9, Issue1January 1969Pages 14-16 RelatedInformation