Amniotic Fluid Matrix Metalloproteinase-8 Research Articles

A multivariable prediction model for intra-amniotic infection in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes including a point of care system that measures amniotic fluid MMP-8.

Among patients with preterm labor and intact membranes (PTL), those with intra-amniotic infection (IAI) present the highest risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. Current identification of IAI, based on microbiological cultures and/or polymerase chain reaction amplification of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene, delay diagnosis and, consequently, antenatal management. The aim to of the study was to assess the performance of a multivariable prediction model for diagnosing IAI in patients with PTL below 34.0weeks using clinical, sonographic and biochemical biomarkers. From 2019 to 2022, we prospectively included pregnant patients admitted below 34.0weeks with diagnosis of PTL and had undergone amniocentesis to rule in/out IAI. The main outcome was IAI, defined by a positive culture and/or 16S ribosomal RNA gene in amniotic fluid. Based on the date of admission, the sample (n=98) was divided into a derivation (2019-2020, n=49) and validation cohort (2021-2022, n=49). Logistic regression models were developed for the outcomes evaluated. As predictive variables we explored ultrasound cervical length measurement at admission, maternal C-reactive protein, gestational age, and amniotic fluid glucose and matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8) levels. The model was developed in the derivation cohort and applied to the validation cohort and diagnostic performance was evaluated. Clinical management was blinded to the model results. During the study period, we included 98 patients admitted with a diagnosis of PTL. Of these, 10 % had IAI. The final model included MMP-8 and amniotic fluid glucose levels and showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to predict the risk of IAI of 0.961 (95 % confidence interval: 0.860-0.995) with a sensitivity of 75 %, specificity of 93.3 %, positive likelihood ratio (LR) of 11.3 and negative LR of 0.27 in the validation cohort. In patients with PTL, a multivariable prediction model including amniotic fluid MMP-8 and glucose levels might help in the clinical management of patients undergoing amniocentesis to rule in/out IAI, providing results within a few minutes.

Preterm labor with intact membranes: a simple noninvasive method to identify patients at risk for intra-amniotic infection and/or inflammation

Objective To develop a noninvasive scoring system to identify patients at high risk for intra-amniotic infection and/or inflammation, which would reduce the need for amniocentesis. Methods This prospective cohort study comprised patients admitted with preterm labor and intact membranes (20–34 weeks of gestation) who underwent a transabdominal amniocentesis and for whom concentrations of quantitative cervical fetal fibronectin and of maternal serum C-reactive protein (CRP) were determined. Intra-amniotic infection was defined as a positive amniotic fluid culture for microorganisms. Intra-amniotic inflammation was defined as an amniotic fluid matrix metalloproteinase-8 concentration >23 ng/mL. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify intra-amniotic infection/inflammtion with noninvasive parameters that had a significant relationship with univariate analysis. With four parameters identified by multivariate analysis, we generated a noninvasive risk scoring system. Results Of the study population consisting of 138 singleton pregnant women, (1) the overall rate of intra-amniotic infection/inflammation was 28.3% (39/138); (2) four parameters were used to develop a noninvasive risk scoring system [i.e. cervical fetal fibronectin concentration (score 0–2), maternal serum CRP concentration (score 0–2), cervical dilatation (score 0-2), and gestational age at presentation (score 0–1)]; the total score ranges from 0 to 7; 3) the area under the curve of the risk score was 0.96 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.92–0.99), significantly higher than that of each predictor in the identification of intra-amniotic infection/inflammation (p < .001, for all); 4) the risk score with a cutoff of 4 had a sensitivity of 94.9% (37/39), a specificity of 90.9% (90/99), a positive predictive value of 80.4% (37/46), a negative predictive value of 97.8% (90/92), a positive likelihood ratio of 10.4 (95% CI, 5.6–19.5), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.06 (95% CI, 0.15–0.22) in the identification of intra-amniotic infection/inflammation. Conclusions (1) The combination of four parameters (concentrations of cervical fetal fibronectin and maternal serum CRP, cervical dilatation, and gestational age) was independently associated with intra-amniotic infection and/or inflammation; and (2) the risk scoring system comprised of the combination of 4 noninvasive parameters was sensitive and specific to identify the patients at risk for intra-amniotic infection and/or inflammation.

Lamellar body count: Marker for foetal lung maturation promoted by intra-amniotic infection and/or inflammation

ObjectiveThere is evidence indicating that the risk of respiratory distress syndrome is reduced in preterm neonates exposed to intra-amniotic infection and/or inflammation. We hypothesised that foetal lung maturation promoted by intra-amniotic infection and/or inflammation results in elevated lamellar body count (LBC) in amniotic fluid (AF). This study aimed to determine the relationship between LBC in AF and intra-amniotic infection and/or inflammation in patients with threatened preterm birth. Study designThis was a retrospective cohort study of patients with threatened preterm birth. A total of 104 consecutive pregnant women underwent amniocentesis in the early preterm period [gestational age < 34 weeks] to evaluate intra-amniotic infection and/or inflammation and foetal lung maturity. Intra-amniotic infection was confirmed by positive AF culture results for aerobic/anaerobic bacteria, fungi, and genital mycoplasma. Intra-amniotic inflammation was defined as a positive AF matrix metalloproteinase-8 rapid test. Outcomes of the study population were compared according to LBC in AF using a cut-off of 15,000/mm3. ResultsThe rates of elevated LBC and intra-amniotic infection and/or inflammation were 23% (24/104) and 52% (54/104), respectively. The median LBC was significantly higher in patients with intra-amniotic infection and/or inflammation than in those without [median LBC, 9,000/mm3 (interquartile range, IQR: 3,000–39,000) vs. 3,000/mm3 (IQR: 2,750–5,000), p < 0.001]. Intra-amniotic infection and/or inflammation was observed in 96% (23/24) of patients with elevated LBC and 39% (31/80) of patients without elevated LBC (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, the presence of intra-amniotic infection and/or inflammation was significantly associated with elevated LBC with an odds ratio (OR) of 66.0 [95% confidence interval (CI) 6.6–664.4, p < 0.001], even after accounting for gestational age at amniocentesis being a significantly related factor for predicting elevated LBC with an OR of 1.5 (95% CI 1.1–2.0, p = 0.004). ConclusionLBC elevation was independently associated with the presence of intra-amniotic infection and/or inflammation in women with early threatened preterm birth (gestational age < 34 weeks). This finding may support the view that an intra-amniotic inflammatory response promotes foetal lung maturation that can be detected by elevated LBC in AF.

The Relationship Among Intra-Amniotic Inflammatory Response, The Progression of Inflammation in Chorionic Plate and Early-Onset Neonatal Sepsis.

Background: The chorionic plate (CP) has been denigrated by the well-known route of the extraplacental membranes from the decidua parietalis through the chorion to the amnion in the progression of ascending intrauterine infection among preterm births (PTBs). However, considering previous studies reporting the relationship among intra-amniotic inflammatory response (IAIR), the progression of inflammation in extraplacental membranes and early-onset neonatal sepsis (EONS), and the anatomic connection between extraplacental membranes and CP, there is a good chance that IAIR would be more likely and severe according to the progression of inflammation in CP, and this progression of inflammation in CP would be associated with a significant increase in EONS in neonates delivered due to either PTL or preterm-PROM. Unfortunately, there is no information about the relationship among IAIR, the progression of inflammation in CP, and EONS among spontaneous PTBs. The objective of the current study is to examine this issue.Method: The study population included 309 singleton pregnant women-delivered preterm neonates with the following conditions: (1) gestational age (GA) at delivery: 20.0~36.9 weeks; (2) spontaneous PTBs: PTL (151 cases) or preterm-PROM (158 cases); (3) available results of placental histologic examination; (4) without congenital anomaly; and (5) delivery within 60 h of amniocentesis. We examined IAIR, and the frequency of intra-amniotic inflammation (IAI) and EONS according to the progression of inflammation in CP [i.e., stage-0, inflammation-free CP; stage-1, inflammation restricted to subchorionic fibrin (SCF); stage-2, inflammation in connective tissue (CT) of CP but without chorionic vasculitis; and stage-3, chorionic vasculitis]. IAIR was determined by amniotic fluid (AF) matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8) concentration (ng/ml), and IAI was defined as an elevated AF MMP-8 concentration (≥23 ng/ml). EONS included either suspected or proven EONS.Results: (1) Each stage (stage-0 to stage-3) was present in 69.3% (214/309), 15.9% (49/309), 11.0% (34/309), and 3.9% (12/309) of the study population. (2) AF MMP-8 concentrations continuously elevated according to the progression of inflammation in CP [stage-0 vs. stage-1 vs. stage-2 vs. stage-3; median (ng/ml), range (ng/ml); 6.0 (0.3–4202.7) vs. 153.9 (0.3–6142.6) vs. 464.9 (5.8–3929.0) vs. 1,780.4 (35.1–5019.5); Kruskal–Wallis test, P < 0.001 and Spearman's rank-correlation test, P < 0.000001, r = 0.553]. (3) Moreover, the frequency of IAI and EONS gradually increased with the progression of inflammation in CP [stage-0 vs. stage-1 vs. stage-2 vs. stage-3; IAI, 30.5% (64/210) vs. 70.2% (33/47) vs. 96.7% (29/30) vs. 100% (12/12); EONS, 3.5% (7/200) vs. 25.5% (12/47) vs. 32.3% (10/31) vs. 40.0% (4/10); each for Pearson's chi-square test, P < 0.000001 and linear-by-linear association, P < 0.000001]. (4) Of note, multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that a more advanced stage in the progression of inflammation within CP was associated with a higher odds ratio (OR) for EONS [stage-1 vs. stage-2 vs. stage-3; OR, 7.215, 95% confidence-interval (CI) (2.177–23.908) vs. OR, 10.705, 95% CI (2.613–43.849) vs. OR, 27.189, 95% CI (2.557–289.124)] compared with stage-0 even after the adjustment for potential confounding variables.Conclusion: IAIR is more likely and severe according to the progression of inflammation in CP, and this progression of inflammation in CP is an independent risk factor for EONS in spontaneous PTBs. This finding suggests that CP may be another playground for the progression of ascending intrauterine infection in addition to extraplacental membranes, and the progression of inflammation in CP may be used for the prediction of EONS in spontaneous PTBs.

A new rapid bedside test to diagnose and monitor intraamniotic inflammation in preterm PROM using transcervically collected fluid

Microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity, a clinical condition present in approximately 50% of patients with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes, is often associated with intraamniotic inflammation, a risk factor for a short admission-to-delivery interval, early preterm delivery, and neonatal complications. We previously developed a transcervical amniotic fluid collector, the device that allows the collection of fluid noninvasively from the cervical canal when membrane rupture occurs. This study was designed to determine whether rapid analysis of an interleukin-8 concentration in fluid obtained noninvasively by the transcervical amniotic fluid collector can be used to assess the risk of intraamniotic inflammation. We also compared the diagnostic performance of this point-of-care test for interleukin-8 in transcervically obtained fluid to that of a white blood cell count determined in amniotic fluid retrieved by transabdominal amniocentesis. This prospective cohort study was conducted between October 2011 and April 2017. Fluid was retrieved through both transabdominal amniocentesis and the use of a transcervical amniotic fluid collector within 24 hours of amniocentesis in patients with a singleton pregnancy and preterm prelabor rupture of the membranes (16-35 weeks of gestation). Amniotic fluid obtained via amniocentesis was cultured for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria and genital mycoplasmas; a white blood cell count was also measured in amniotic fluid. Intraamniotic infection was diagnosed when microorganisms were identified by the cultivation of amniotic fluid. Intraamniotic inflammation was defined as an elevated amniotic fluid matrix metalloproteinase-8 concentration (>23 ng/mL) assayed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Interleukin-8 in cervical fluid obtained by the collector was measured by the point-of-care test that used a test strip and scanner based on the fluorescence immunochromatographic analysis in 2019. The diagnostic indices, predictive values, and likelihood ratios of the 2 different tests were calculated. First, interleukin-8 concentration ≥9.5 ng/mL in cervical fluid, determined by the point-of-care test, was at the knee of the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and had a sensitivity of 98% (56/57; 95% confidence interval, 91-99.96%), specificity of 74% (40/54; 95% confidence interval, 60-85%), positive predictive value of 80% (56/70; 95% confidence interval, 72-86%), negative predictive value of 98% (40/41; 95% confidence interval, 85-99.6%), positive likelihood ratio of 3.79 (95% confidence interval, 2.41-5.96), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.02 (95% confidence interval, 0.003-0.17) in the identification of intraamniotic inflammation; a concentration of matrix metalloproteinase-8 >23 ng/mL by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay had a prevalence of 51% (57/111). Second, a cervical fluid interleukin-8 concentration ≥9.5 ng/mL had significantly higher sensitivity than a transabdominally obtained amniotic fluid white blood cell count (≥19 cells/mm3) in the identification of intraamniotic inflammation (sensitivity: 98% [95% confidence interval, 91-99.96%] vs 84% [95% confidence interval, 72-93%]; P<.05; specificity: 74% [95% confidence interval, 60-85%] vs 76% [95% confidence interval, 62-87%); positive and negative predictive values: 80% [95% confidence interval, 72-86%] and 98% [95% confidence interval, 85-99.6%] vs 79% [95% confidence interval, 69-86%] and 82% [95% confidence interval, 71-89%]) and in the identification of intraamniotic inflammation/infection (gold standard: positive culture for bacteria or a matrix metalloproteinase-8 >23 ng/mL; sensitivity: 91% [95% confidence interval, 82-97%] vs 75% [95% confidence interval, 63-85%]; P<.05). The point-of-care test was predictive of intraamniotic inflammation, based on the determination of interleukin-8 in fluid retrieved by a transcervical amniotic fluid collector. Therefore, the analysis of cervically obtained fluid by such point-of-care test may be used to noninvasively monitor intraamniotic inflammation in patients with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes.

The earlier the gestational age, the greater the intensity of the intra-amniotic inflammatory response in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes and amniotic fluid infection by Ureaplasma species.

Objectives To determine the relationship between the intensity of the intra-amniotic inflammatory response and the gestational age at the time of diagnosis in cases with preterm premature rupture of membranes (PROM) and intra-amniotic infection caused by Ureaplasma spp. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted which included 71 women with preterm PROM and a positive amniotic fluid culture with Ureaplasma spp. Women with mixed intra-amniotic infections were excluded. The study population was classified into three groups according to gestational age: group 1, <26 weeks (extreme preterm PROM, n = 17); group 2, 26.0-33.9 weeks (moderate preterm PROM, n = 39); group 3, 34.0-36.9 weeks (late preterm PROM, n = 15). The intensity of the intra-amniotic and maternal inflammatory response was compared among the three groups. The intensity of the intra-amniotic inflammatory response was assessed by the concentration of amniotic fluid matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8) and white blood cell (WBC) count. The maternal inflammatory response was assessed by the concentration of C-reactive protein (CRP) and WBC count in maternal blood at the time of amniocentesis. Results (1) The median values of amniotic fluid MMP-8 concentration and WBC count were the highest in the extreme preterm PROM group and the lowest in the late preterm PROM group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.01, respectively); (2) the intensity of the maternal inflammatory response measured by maternal blood WBC count and CRP concentration was not significantly associated with gestational age at the time of diagnosis. Conclusion The earlier the gestational age at the time of PROM, the higher the intensity of the intra-amniotic inflammatory response in women with preterm PROM and intra-amniotic infection caused by Ureaplasma spp.

A high concentration of fetal fibronectin in cervical secretions increases the risk of intra-amniotic infection and inflammation in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes

Objective To determine whether the risk of intra-amniotic infection/inflammation and spontaneous preterm delivery (SPTD) varies as a function of the concentration of cervical fetal fibronectin (fFN) in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Methods This prospective study included 180 patients with preterm labor and intact membranes who had a sample collected for quantitative fFN measurement and underwent amniocentesis. Amniotic fluid was cultured for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria and genital mycoplasmas. Intra-amniotic inflammation was defined as an amniotic fluid matrix metalloproteinase-8 concentration >23 ng/mL. Results (1) The prevalence of intra-amniotic infection/inflammation and SPTD within 7 days was 32.2% (58/180) and 33.9% (61/178), respectively; (2) The higher the fFN concentration, the greater the risk of intra-amniotic infection/inflammation and SPTD within 7 days (P<0.001, respectively); (3) An fFN concentration 150 ng/mL had a better diagnostic performance than an fFN 50 ng/mL in the identification of intra-amniotic infection/inflammation and SPTD within 7 days; (4) Among the patients with an fFN <50 ng/mL, intra-amniotic infection/inflammation was identified in 7.6% (6/79) of patients and 66.7% (4/6) delivered within 7 days. Conclusion The higher the concentration of fFN, the greater the risk of intra-amniotic infection/inflammation and SPTD in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes.

Cervical and Amniotic Fluid Matrix Metalloproteinase-8 and Interleukin-6 Concentrations in Preterm Pregnancies with or without Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes

Introduction: Intra-amniotic inflammation is defined by elevated inflammatory biomarkers in the amniotic fluid (AF), either due to microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity (MIAC) or sterile inflammation. Amniocentesis being an invasive procedure, we wanted to investigate whether elevated matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8) or interleukin-6 (IL-6) concentrations could be detected from cervical fluid samples. Materials and Methods: This prospective study included 67 women with singleton nondiabetic pregnancies with or without preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) between 22⁺⁰ and 37⁺⁰ weeks of gestation. Simultaneous AF and cervical samples were obtained. Results: In women without PPROM, cervical MMP-8 concentrations correlated with AF MMP-8 concentrations (r_S = 0.466, p = 0.002), but cervical IL-6 did not correlate with AF IL-6 (r_S = 0.277, p = 0.076). In PPROM cases no correlations were found. Women with MIAC had higher concentrations of AF MMP-8 and AF IL-6 compared to women without MIAC regardless of membrane status. However, only women without PPROM had higher concentrations of cervical MMP-8 in proven MIAC. Conclusion: In women without PPROM, cervical MMP-8 concentration reflects the magnitude of AF MMP-8, thus potentially guiding the selection of patients benefitting from amniocentesis.

The frequency and clinical significance of intra-amniotic inflammation in twin pregnancies with preterm labor and intact membranes

Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the frequency and clinical significance of intra-amniotic inflammation in twin pregnancies with preterm labor and intact membranes.Study design: Amniotic fluid (AF) was retrieved from both sacs in 90 twin gestations with preterm labor and intact membranes (gestational age between 20 and 34 6/7 weeks). Preterm labor was defined as the presence of painful regular uterine contractions, with a frequency of at least 2 every 10 min, requiring hospitalization. Fluid was cultured and assayed for matrix metalloproteinase-8. Intra-amniotic inflammation was defined as an AF matrix metalloproteinase-8 concentration >23 ng/mL.Results: The prevalence of intra-amniotic inflammation for at least 1 amniotic sac was 39% (35/90), while that of proven intra-amniotic infection for at least one amniotic sac was 10% (9/90). Intra-amniotic inflammation without proven microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity was found in 29% (26/90) of the cases. Intra-amniotic inflammation was present in both amniotic sacs for 22 cases, in the presenting amniotic sac for 12 cases, and in the non-presenting amniotic sac for one case. Women with intra-amniotic inflammation observed in at least one amniotic sac and a negative AF culture for microorganisms had a significantly higher rate of adverse pregnancy outcome than those with a negative AF culture and without intra-amniotic inflammation (lower gestational age at birth, shorter amniocentesis-to-delivery interval, and significant neonatal morbidity). Importantly, there was no significant difference in pregnancy outcome between women with intra-amniotic inflammation and a negative AF culture and those with a positive AF culture.Conclusion: Intra-amniotic inflammation is present in 39% of twin pregnancies with preterm labor and intact membranes and is a risk factor for impending preterm delivery and adverse outcome, regardless of the presence or absence of bacteria detected using cultivation techniques.

The combined exposure to intra-amniotic inflammation and neonatal respiratory distress syndrome increases the risk of intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm neonates.

To evaluate the impact of combined exposure to intra-amniotic inflammation and neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) on the development of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) in preterm neonates. This retrospective cohort study includes 207 consecutive preterm births (24.0-33.0 weeks of gestation). Intra-amniotic inflammation was defined as an amniotic fluid matrix metalloproteinase-8 concentration >23 ng/mL. According to McMenamin's classification, IVH was defined as grade II or higher when detected by neurosonography within the first weeks of life. (1) IVH was diagnosed in 6.8% (14/207) of neonates in the study population; (2) IVH was frequent among newborns exposed to intra-amniotic inflammation when followed by postnatal RDS [33% (6/18)]. The frequency of IVH was 7% (8/115) among neonates exposed to either of these conditions - intra-amniotic inflammation or RDS - and 0% (0/64) among those who were not exposed to these conditions; and (3) Neonates exposed to intra-amniotic inflammation and postnatal RDS had a significantly higher risk of IVH than those with only intra-amniotic inflammation [odds ratio (OR) 4.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-19.3] and those with RDS alone (OR 5.6, 95% CI 1.0-30.9), after adjusting for gestational age. The combined exposure to intra-amniotic inflammation and postnatal RDS markedly increased the risk of IVH in preterm neonates.

Twenty-four percent of patients with clinical chorioamnionitis in preterm gestations have no evidence of either culture-proven intraamniotic infection or intraamniotic inflammation

Recent studies on clinical chorioamnionitis at term suggest that some patients with this diagnosis have neither intraamniotic infection nor intraamniotic inflammation. A false-positive diagnosis of clinical chorioamnionitis in preterm gestation may lead to unwarranted preterm delivery. We sought to determine the frequency of intraamniotic inflammation and microbiologically proven amniotic fluid infection in patients with preterm clinical chorioamnionitis. Amniocentesis was performed in singleton pregnant women with preterm clinical chorioamnionitis (<36 weeks of gestation). Amniotic fluid was cultured for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria and genital mycoplasmas and assayed for matrix metalloproteinase-8 concentration. Microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity was defined as a positive amniotic fluid culture; intraamniotic inflammation was defined as an elevated amniotic fluid matrix metalloproteinase-8 concentration of >23 ng/mL. Nonparametric and survival techniques were used for analysis. Among patients with preterm clinical chorioamnionitis, 24% (12/50) had neither microbiologic evidence of intraamniotic infection nor intraamniotic inflammation. Microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity was present in 34% (18/53) and intraamniotic inflammation in 76% (38/50) of patients. The most common microorganisms isolated from the amniotic cavity were the Ureaplasma species. Finally, patients without microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity or intraamniotic inflammation had significantly lower rates of adverse outcomes (including lower gestational age at delivery, a shorter amniocentesis-to-delivery interval, acute histologic chorioamnionitis, acute funisitis, and significant neonatal morbidity) than those with microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity and/or intraamniotic inflammation. Among patients with preterm clinical chorioamnionitis, 24% had no evidence of either intraamniotic infection or intraamniotic inflammation, and 66% had negative amniotic fluid cultures, using standard microbiologic techniques. These observations call for a reexamination of the criteria used to diagnose preterm clinical chorioamnionitis.

Comparison of amniotic fluid matrix metalloproteinase-8 and cathelicidin in the diagnosis of intra-amniotic infection.

To evaluate the association of amniotic fluid (AF) matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8) and cathelicidin concentrations with microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity (MIAC) in pregnancies with preterm prelabor rupture of the membranes or intact membranes. Amniocentesis was performed in 54 singleton pregnancies between 22+0 and 34+2 gestational weeks with suspected intra-amniotic infection. AF-MMP-8 was analysed by immunoassay and AF-cathelicidin by commercial ELISA. Standard biochemical methods, molecular microbiology and culture techniques were used. MIAC was present in 18 (33%) women. The cutoff value for the diagnosis of MIAC was 41.5 ng ml-1 for AF-MMP-8, and 11.6 ng ml-1 for AF-cathelicidin. With these cutoff values AF-MMP-8 had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 69%, positive predictive value of 62% and negative predictive value of 100% for MIAC. The corresponding values for AF-cathelicidin were 89, 81, 70 and 94%. The performance of AF-cathelicidin in the prediction of MIAC is comparable to AF-MMP-8.

An elevated amniotic fluid prostaglandin F2α concentration is associated with intra-amniotic inflammation/infection, and clinical and histologic chorioamnionitis, as well as impending preterm delivery in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes

Objective: To determine whether an elevated amniotic fluid concentration of prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α) is associated with intra-amniotic inflammation/infection and adverse pregnancy outcomes in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes.Materials and methods: The retrospective cohort study included 132 patients who had singleton pregnancies with preterm labor (< 35 weeks of gestation) and intact membranes. Amniotic fluid was cultured for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria as well as for genital mycoplasmas. Intra-amniotic inflammation was defined by an elevated amniotic fluid matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8) concentration (>23 ng/mL). PGF2α was measured with a sensitive and specific immunoassay. The amniotic fluid PGF2α concentration was considered elevated when it was above the 95th percentile among pregnant women at 15–36 weeks of gestation who were not in labor (≥170 pg/mL).Results: (1) The prevalence of an elevated amniotic fluid PGF2α concentration was 40.2% (53/132) in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes; (2) patients with an elevated amniotic fluid PGF2α concentration had a significantly higher rate of positive amniotic fluid culture [19% (10/53) versus 5% (4/79); p = 0.019], intra-amniotic inflammation/infection [49% (26/53) versus 20% (16/79); p = 0.001], spontaneous preterm delivery, clinical and histologic chorioamnionitis, and funisitis, as well as a higher median amniotic fluid MMP-8 concentration and amniotic fluid white blood cell count and a shorter amniocentesis-to-delivery interval than those without an elevated concentration of amniotic fluid PGF2α (p < 0.05 for each); and (3) an elevated amniotic fluid PGF2α concentration was associated with a shorter amniocentesis-to-delivery interval after adjustment for the presence of intra-amniotic inflammation/infection [hazard ratio 2.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4–3.1; p = 0.001].Conclusion: The concentration of PGF2α was elevated in the amniotic fluid of 40.2% of patients with preterm labor and intact membranes and is an independent risk factor for intra-amniotic inflammation/infection, impending preterm delivery, chorioamnionitis, and funisitis.

About one-half of early spontaneous preterm deliveries can be identified by a rapid matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8) bedside test at the time of mid-trimester genetic amniocentesis*

Objective: Mid-trimester amniocentesis continues to be used for the prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal anomalies and other genetic disorders. Analysis of amniotic fluid obtained at the time of mid-trimester genetic amniocentesis identifies those patients who are at risk for early spontaneous preterm delivery. This is based on a solid body of evidence that found subclinical intra-amniotic inflammation/infection to be causally linked to early spontaneous preterm birth. Although several biomarkers have been proposed to identify intra-amniotic inflammation, the accumulated data suggest that the determination of amniotic fluid matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8), or neutrophil collagenase, is a powerful predictor of spontaneous preterm delivery. MMP-8 is released by inflammatory cells in response to microbial products or “danger signals”. A rapid point-of-care test has been developed to determine MMP-8 at the bedside within 20 min, and without the requirement of laboratory equipment. The objective of this study was to determine whether an elevation of MMP-8 in the amniotic fluid, measured by a rapid point-of-care test, can identify those patients at risk for spontaneous preterm delivery after a mid-trimester genetic amniocentesis. Study design: A case–control study was designed to obtain amniotic fluid from asymptomatic singleton pregnant women who underwent mid-trimester genetic amniocentesis. An MMP-8 bedside test was performed to analyze the amniotic fluid of 64 patients with early spontaneous preterm delivery (<30 weeks) and 128 matched controls with normal pregnancy outcomes. Results: (1) The MMP-8 bedside test (Yoon's MMP-8 Check™) was positive in 42.2% (27/64) of patients with spontaneous preterm delivery but in none (0/128) of the control cases (p < 0.001); (2) the MMP-8 bedside test had a sensitivity of 42.2%, and a specificity of 100% in the prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery (<30 weeks) following a mid-trimester genetic amniocentesis; and (3) among the patients with spontaneous preterm delivery, those with a positive MMP-8 bedside test had a significantly higher rate of spontaneous delivery within 2 weeks and 4 weeks of an amniocentesis [40.7% (11/27) versus 5.4% (2/37); 63.0% (17/27) versus 24.3% (9/37)] and a shorter interval-to-delivery period than those with a negative test [interval-to-delivery: median (range), 16 d (0–95 d) versus 42 d (2–91 d); p < 0.05 for each]. Conclusion: We conclude that 42% of patients with an early spontaneous preterm delivery (< 30 weeks) could be identified by a rapid MMP-8 bedside test at the time of their mid-trimester genetic amniocentesis. The MMP-8 bedside test is a powerful predictor of early spontaneous preterm birth in asymptomatic pregnant women.

Gastric fluid versus amniotic fluid analysis for the identification of intra-amniotic infection due to Ureaplasma species

Objective: Early neonatal sepsis is often due to intra-amniotic infection. The stomach of the neonate contains fluid swallowed before and during delivery. The presence of bacteria as well as neutrophils detected by culture or Gram stain of the gastric fluid during the first day of life is suggestive of exposure to bacteria or inflammation. We undertook this study to determine the relationship between gastric fluid analysis and amniotic fluid obtained by transabdominal amniocentesis in the detection of Ureaplasma species, the most frequent microorganisms responsible for intra-amniotic infection.Materials and methods: The study population consisted of 100 singleton pregnant women who delivered preterm neonates (<35 weeks) within 7 days of amniocentesis. Gastric fluid of newborns was obtained by nasogastric intubation on the day of birth. Amniotic fluid and gastric fluid were cultured for genital Mycoplasmas, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for Ureaplasma species was performed. Intra-amniotic inflammation was defined as an elevated amniotic fluid matrix metalloproteinase-8 concentration (>23 ng/mL).Results: (1) Ureaplasma species were detected by culture or PCR in 18% (18/100) of amniotic fluid samples and in 5% (5/100) of gastric fluid samples; (2) among the amniotic fluid cases positive for Ureaplasma species, these microorganisms were identified in 27.8% (5/18) of gastric fluid samples; (3) none of the cases negative for Ureaplasma species in the amniotic fluid were found to be positive for these microorganisms in the gastric fluid; (4) patients with amniotic fluid positive for Ureaplasma species but with gastric fluid negative for these microorganisms had a significantly higher rate of intra-amniotic inflammation, acute histologic chorioamnionitis, and neonatal death than those with both amniotic fluid and gastric fluid negative for Ureaplasma species; and (5) no significant differences were observed in the rate of intra-amniotic inflammation, acute histologic chorioamnionitis, and neonatal death between patients with amniotic fluid positive for Ureaplasma species but with gastric fluid negative for these microorganisms and those with both amniotic fluid and gastric fluid positive for Ureaplasma species.Conclusions: Gastric fluid analysis has 100% specificity in the identification of intra-amniotic infection with Ureaplasma species. However, the detection of Ureaplasma species by culture or PCR in the gastric fluid of neonates at birth did not identify these microorganisms in two-thirds of cases with microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity. Thus, amniotic fluid analysis is superior to that of gastric fluid in the identification of intra-amniotic infection.

Meconium aspiration syndrome: a role for fetal systemic inflammation

Meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in term infants. Meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) occurs in approximately 1 of every 7 pregnancies, but only 5% of neonates exposed to MSAF develop MAS. Why some infants exposed to meconium develop MAS while others do not is a fundamental question. Patients with MSAF have a higher frequency of intraamniotic inflammation/infection than those with clear fluid. We propose that fetal systemic inflammation is a risk factor for the development of MAS in patients with MSAF. We sought to investigate whether intraamniotic inflammation and funisitis, the histopathologic landmark of a fetal inflammatory response, predispose to MAS. A prospective cohort study was conducted from 1995 through 2009. Amniotic fluid (AF) samples (n = 1281) were collected at the time of cesarean delivery from women who delivered singleton newborns at term (gestational age ≥38 weeks). Intraamniotic inflammation was diagnosed if the AF concentration of matrix metalloproteinase-8 was >23 ng/mL. Funisitis was diagnosed by histologic examination if inflammation was present in the umbilical cord. The prevalence of MSAF was 9.2% (118/1281), and 10.2% (12/118) of neonates exposed to MSAF developed MAS. There were no significant differences in the median gestational age or umbilical cord arterial pH at birth between neonates who developed MAS and those who did not (each P > .1). Mothers whose newborns developed MAS had a higher median of AF matrix metalloproteinase-8 (456.8 vs 157.2 ng/mL, P < .05). Newborns exposed to intraamniotic inflammation had a higher rate of MAS than those who were not exposed to intraamniotic inflammation [13.0% (10/77) vs 0% (0/32), P = .03], as did those exposed to funisitis [31.3% (5/16) vs 7.3% (6/82); relative risk, 4.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-12.3]. Among the 89 newborns for whom both AF and placental histology were available, MAS was more common in patients with both intraamniotic inflammation and funisitis than in those without intraamniotic inflammation and funisitis [28.6% (4/14) vs 0% (0/28), P = .009], while the rate of MAS did not show a significant difference between patients with intraamniotic inflammation alone (without funisitis) and those without intraamniotic inflammation and funisitis [10.9% (5/46) vs 0% (0/28)]. The combination of intraamniotic inflammation with fetal systemic inflammation is an important antecedent of MAS. This concept has implications for the understanding of the mechanisms of disease responsible for MAS and for the development of prognostic models and therapeutic interventions for this disorder.

Amniotic fluid CA-125 as a marker of intra-amniotic inflammation associated with preterm delivery: a preliminary single center study

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether amniotic fluid (AF) CA-125 in patients with preterm labor or preterm premature rupture of membranes can help predict intra-amniotic inflammation (IAI), microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity (MIAC) and imminent delivery. We recruited 36 women who admitted with impending preterm delivery and suspicious AF infection. AF matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8), white blood cell (WBC) count, glucose levels, and CA-125 levels were measured, and the MMP-8 bedside rapid test was also performed. AF culture and PCR were subsequently performed to confirm MIAC. We compared AF CA-125 levels according to the presence of IAI or MIAC and assessed its predictive value for delivery within 7 days of admission. AF CA-125 levels were significantly higher in the IAI group than in the non-IAI group (mean ± standard deviation: 5608 ± 864 vs 904 ± 84 IU/ml; p = 0.001). AF CA-125 levels showed a negative correlation with gestational age and a positive correlation with AF WBC counts and MMP-8 levels. AF CA-125 levels were higher in the MIAC group, though this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.064). Delivery within 7 days of admission was significantly more common in patients with higher AF CA-125 levels (cut-off: 1650 IU/ml, sensitivity: 71.4 %, specificity: 86.4 %, p = 0.005). AF CA-125 levels are increased in patients with AF inflammation and can be a predictor of imminent preterm delivery.

The assessment of the relationship between amniotic fluid matrix metalloproteinase-9 and zinc levels with adverse obstetric outcomes

To examine the relationship between the amniotic fluid MMP-9 and zinc levels during 16-19th gestational weeks and perinatal outcomes. One hundred and seventeen singleton pregnancies that underwent genetic amniocentesis from January 2005 through November 2009 were evaluated. Subjects were divided into two main groups: a control group (group 1) (n: 74), and an adverse obstetric outcomes group (group 2) (n: 43). Group 2 consisted of the following: preterm birth group, gestational hypertension and preeclampsia group, gestational diabetes group, fetal growth restriction group, macrosomia group, and pregnancy loss group. MMP-9 and zinc (Zn) values in the amniocentesis materials sampled between the 16th and 19th gestational weeks were analyzed retrospectively in terms of perinatal outcomes. Any significant difference among the groups was assessed by unpaired samples t test and the Mann-Whitney U test. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. A comparison among groups showed no significant difference in terms of Zn results between the group 1 and 2 (p = 0.879). MMP-9 levels were significantly lower in both the preterm birth group (p = 0.043) and group 1 (p = 0.015). We found that the amniotic fluid MMP-9 levels of patients who delivered preterm were significantly lower between the 16th and 19th gestational weeks.

The diagnostic performance of the Mass Restricted (MR) score in the identification of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity or intra-amniotic inflammation is not superior to amniotic fluid interleukin-6

Objective: Intra-amniotic infection/inflammation are major causes of spontaneous preterm labor and delivery. However, diagnosis of intra-amniotic infection is challenging because most are subclinical and amniotic fluid (AF) cultures take several days before results are available. Several tests have been proposed for the rapid diagnosis of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity (MIAC) or intra-amniotic inflammation. The aim of this study was to examine the diagnostic performance of the AF Mass Restricted (MR) score in comparison with interleukin-6 (IL-6) and matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8) for the identification of MIAC or inflammation.Methods: AF samples were collected from patients with singleton gestations and symptoms of preterm labor (n = 100). Intra-amniotic inflammation was defined as >100 white blood cells/mm3 (WBCs) in AF; MIAC was defined as a positive AF culture. AF IL-6 and MMP-8 were determined using ELISA. The MR score was obtained using the Surface-Enhanced Laser Desorption Ionization Time of Flight (SELDI-TOF) mass spectrometry. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated and logistic regression models were fit to construct receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the identification of each outcome. The McNemar’s test and paired sample non-parametric statistical techniques were used to test for differences in diagnostic performance metrics.Results: (1) The prevalence of MIAC and intra-amniotic inflammation was 34% (34/100) and 40% (40/100), respectively; (2) there were no significant differences in sensitivity of the three tests under study (MR score, IL-6 or MMP-8) in the identification of either MIAC or intra-amniotic inflammation (using the following cutoffs: MR score >2, IL-6 >11.4 ng/mL, and MMP-8 >23 ng/mL); (3) there was no significant difference in the sensitivity among the three tests for the same outcomes when the false positive rate was fixed at 15%; (4) the specificity for IL-6 was not significantly different from that of the MR score in identifying either MIAC or intra-amniotic inflammation when using previously reported thresholds; and (5) there were no significant differences in the area under the ROC curve when comparing the MR score, IL-6 or MMP-8 in the identification of these outcomes.Conclusions: IL-6 and the MR score have equivalent diagnostic performance in the identification of MIAC or intra-amniotic inflammation. Selection from among these three tests (MR score, IL-6 and MMP-8) for diagnostic purposes should be based on factors such as availability, reproducibility, and cost. The MR score requires a protein chip and a SELDI-TOF instrument which are not widely available or considered “state of the art”. In contrast, immunoassays for IL-6 can be performed in the majority of clinical laboratories.

Fetal, amniotic and maternal inflammatory responses in early stage of ascending intrauterine infection, inflammation restricted to chorio-decidua, in preterm gestation

Objective: No data exist on the frequency and intensity of the fetal, intraamniotic and maternal inflammation in preterm-gestations with inflammation restricted to chorio-decidua, early stage of ascending intrauterine infection. The objective of the study is to examine this issue.Study Design: The frequency and intensity of fetal (cord blood C-reactive protein [CRP] at birth >200 ng/ml), intraamniotic (amniotic fluid matrix metalloproteinase-8 [MMP-8] >23 ng/ml) and maternal (maternal serum CRP >0.7 ng/ml) inflammation were compared in 304 singleton preterm-gestations (<35.4 weeks) delivered within 5 days of amniocentesis. Placental pathology was divided into placenta without any inflammation, inflammation restricted to chorio-decidua and inflammation beyond chorio-decidua.Results: Intraamniotic inflammation, but not fetal or maternal inflammation, was significantly more frequent (43.2% versus 10.5%; p < 0.005) and intense (median amniotic fluid MMP-8; 7.5 ng/ml versus 1.3 ng/ml; p < 0.001) in inflammation restricted to chorio-decidua than in placenta without any inflammation. However, inflammation restriced to chorio-decidua was associated with a significantly lower rate and intensity of fetal, intraamniotic and maternal inflammation than inflammation beyond chorio-decidua (each for p < 0.05).Conclusion: Intraamniotic inflammation was more frequent and intense in patients with inflammation restricted to chorio-decidua than in those without placental inflammation. However, fetal and maternal inflammatory responses were similar between these two groups.