Solid acid catalysts prepared by supporting 15 wt%H 3PW 12O 40 heteropoly acid (HPA) on TiO 2, ZrO 2 and Nb 2O 5 with a sub-monolayer HPA coverage were characterised at a gas–solid interface, regarding their acid properties and chemical structure of HPA on the catalyst surface and compared to “standard” HPA catalysts such as bulk and silica-supported H 3PW 12O 40 and Cs 2.5H 0.5PW 12O 40. In contrast to the parent acid, H 3PW 12O 40, possessing strong Brønsted acid sites, the catalysts supported on TiO 2, ZrO 2 and Nb 2O 5 have both Brønsted and Lewis acid sites, with the latter mainly originating from the oxide support. The strength of acid sites in these catalysts is weaker than that in H 3PW 12O 40 and Cs 2.5H 0.5PW 12O 40. The catalytic activity (turnover frequency) in gas-phase isopropanol dehydration decreases in the order: H 3PW 12O 40 > Cs 2.5H 0.5PW 12O 40 > 15%H 3PW 12O 40/SiO 2 > 15%H 3PW 12O 40/TiO 2 > 15%H 3PW 12O 40/Nb 2O 5 > 15%H 3PW 12O 40/ZrO 2, which is in line with the acid strength as determined by NH 3 adsorption calorimetry. Ammonia adsorption calorimetry, 31P{ 1H} MAS NMR and FTIR indicate increasing interaction between support and HPA in the following order of supports: SiO 2 < TiO 2 < Nb 2O 5 < ZrO 2.
Read full abstract