Explorations in the Icy North contributes an original transnational and comparative study of Arctic exploration in the nineteenth century. In four chapters, Kaalund draws from archival sources in Britain, Canada, Denmark, and the United States to track changes in Arctic travel narratives between 1818 and 1883. She investigates these changing narratives to spotlight broader shifts in the financial sponsors of expeditions, technologies of travel and field research, and cultural expectations of how explorers ought to present their work in print. Anyone interested in Arctic history, Arctic exploration, travel writing, nineteenth-century imperial history, or field science will find this work valuable. Of particular interest to readers of this journal will be Kaalund’s integrative analysis of primary-source documents across several national contexts.As a vast geographical region carved into more than a half-dozen nation-states and many more Indigenous settlement areas, the Arctic presents serious barriers to comprehensive historical inquiry. Yet, as Kaalund points out, the majority of historical scholarship about Arctic exploration remains constrained to national boundaries, rarely venturing into international or transnational waters. In contrast, the archival research supporting Explorations in the Icy North spans four significant repositories that have rarely been treated together—the U.S. National Archives, the Royal Society Archives in London, the Scott Polar Research Institute at the University of Cambridge, and the Statsbiblioteket at Aarhus Universitet in Denmark. Kaalund deliberately mobilizes this collection of sources to scrutinize and de-center British experiences in the Arctic, which historians have sometimes treated as a model or benchmark for imperial ambition in high latitudes. Kaalund finds that American, Canadian, and Danish travelers did not always emphasize heroism, “gentlemanly” behaviors, or mourning for lost expeditions as the British itinerants did. This comparison leads Kaalund to conclude that science in the Arctic is far more contingent than even the British example suggests. Authority, in Kaalund’s view, is dependent upon the physical location of field sites, audience, instrumentation and technology, and the political and economic power of funding organizations.Any comparative study must deal with the inevitable challenges of breadth, depth, and emphasis. Although Kaalund’s transnational approach helps to provide a better explanation of the complexities in Arctic science during the nineteenth century, the reader deserves more information about how and why she selected her particular case studies. In each chapter, Kaalund focuses the analysis on a handful of expeditions that she asserts to be the most revealing about explorers’ relationships, travel accounts, field sites, and intellectual communities. Yet she does not cover or quantify the other expeditions that she opted to leave out of her analysis. Nor does she regularly qualify or substantiate claims with evidence from the extensive existing literature about Arctic exploration in the nineteenth century.The tradeoff in this book should be familiar to practitioners in interdisciplinary history, especially transnational history. On one hand, the book covers a wider range of actors than typically appears in “national” Arctic history—missionaries, fur traders, researchers working at Arctic field stations, and both amateur and professional explorers dashing to the North Pole. Pointing to this diversity, Kaalund concludes that the category of explorer and the nature of Arctic science was highly unstable during the nineteenth century. On the other hand, the book begs the question about the extent to which this conclusion reflects the selection of sources rather than the full record of Arctic expeditions during the period. Moreover, because travel accounts were not always read by the same audiences—even within Kaalund’s own chapter-by-chapter groupings—systematic or consistent comparisons of narrative devices is not possible. How can transnational analysis—notwithstanding the richness in its characterization of agency and historical contingency, especially in this work—defend itself more robustly against charges of selection bias?Even with this lingering question, Exploration in the Icy North gives readers much to consider about the nature of field science, exploration, intellectual authority, travel writing, and transnational history. Kaalund’s book advances our understanding of the Arctic, particularly how and why its nineteenth-century explorers, as well as the imperial powers behind them, recorded their efforts to enter, research, and exploit the region.
Read full abstract