American Spinal Injury Association Score Research Articles

Evaluation of clinical factors predicting dysphagia in patients with traumatic and non-traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: a retrospective study

IntroductionDysphagia is a common complication in patients with cervical spinal cord injury (C-SCI) and can cause various pulmonary complications, such as aspiration pneumonia and mechanical airway obstruction increasing mortality and morbidity. This study evaluated the clinical factors that predict dysphagia in patients with traumatic and non-traumatic C-SCI.MethodsNinety-eight patients with C-SCI were retrospectively enrolled in this study and were divided into those with and without dysphagia. Clinical factors such as age, sex, tracheostomy, spinal cord independence measure, pulmonary function test (PFT) including forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and FVC/FEV1, American Spinal Cord Injury Association score, Berg Balance Scale, and surgical approach were investigated retrospectively.ResultsMultivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that FVC and the presence of tracheostomy were significantly correlated with dysphagia in patients with C-SCI (p < 0.05). FVC and the presence of tracheostomy are useful tools for detecting dysphagia in patients with C-SCI.ConclusionConsidering the results of our study, early PFTs, especially FVC, in patients with C-SCI and early initiation of dysphagia management and treatment in patients with C-SCI and tracheostomy will be advantageous in lowering the mortality and morbidity due to pulmonary aspiration in these patients.

Nerve bypass surgery for spinal cord reconstruction

ObjectiveSpinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating condition that significantly decreases the patient's quality of life. Therefore, treatments that can facilitate nerve regeneration, reduce complications, and increase quality of life are valuable for these patients. In this study, we aimed to assess nerve bypass surgery's feasibility and clinical outcomes by transferring the intercostal nerves (ICNs) into the spinal cord. MethodsEight patients with complete thoracic SCI and delayed presentation more than a year after the injury were analyzed retrospectively. All patients underwent nerve bypass surgery with the transfer of two pairs of ICNs from proximal to the injury site to the anterolateral spinal cord, followed by duraplasty with fascia grafting to close the dura. ResultsSix of the eight (75%) patients demonstrated motor and sensory improvements, based on the American Spinal Cord Injury Association score. Three patients demonstrated a limited recovery of motor function that could be independently triggered without ICN initiation. Five patients demonstrated evidence of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage after surgery; however, only one patient complained of a headache. ConclusionSpinal cord bypass surgery is a potential reconstruction method to treat chronic complete thoracic SCI with functional improvements, and is worth further investigation.

Safety and potential efficacy of expanded mesenchymal stromal cells of bone marrow and umbilical cord origins in patients with chronic spinal cord injuries: a phase I/II study

Background aimsSpinal cord injury (SCI) affects patients' physical, psychological, and social well-being. Presently, treatment modalities for chronic SCI have restricted clinical effectiveness. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) demonstrate promise in addressing nervous tissue damage. This single-center, open-label, parallel-group randomized clinical trial aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of intraoperative perilesional administration of expanded autologous bone marrow-derived MSCs (BMMSCs), followed by monthly intrathecal injections, in comparison to monthly intrathecal administration of expanded allogeneic umbilical cord-derived MSCs (UCMSCs) for individuals with chronic SCI. MethodsTwenty participants, who had a minimum of 1 year of SCI duration, were enrolled. Each participant in Group A received perilesional BMMSCs, followed by monthly intrathecal BMMSCs for three injections, while Group B received monthly intrathecal UCMSCs for three injections. Safety and efficacy were evaluated using the American Spinal Cord Injury Association (ASIA) score for at least 1 year post the final injection. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. ResultsGroup A comprised 11 participants, while Group B included 9. The mean follow-up duration was 22.65 months. Mild short-term adverse events encompassed headaches and back pain, with no instances of long-term adverse events. Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in total ASIA scores, with Group A displaying more pronounced motor improvements. ConclusionsOur findings indicate that perilesional administration of expanded autologous BMMSCs, followed by monthly intrathecal BMMSCs for three injections, or monthly intrathecal UCMSCs for three injections appear to be safe and hold promise for individuals with chronic SCI. Nonetheless, larger-scale clinical trials are imperative to validate these observations.

Delayed neurological dysfunction following posterior laminectomy with lateral mass screw fixation: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND While most complications of cervical surgery are reversible, some, such as symptomatic postoperative spinal epidural hematoma (SEH), which generally occurs within 24 h, are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Delayed neurological dysfunction is diagnosed in cases when symptoms present > 3 d postoperatively. Owing to its rarity, the risk factors for delayed neurological dysfunction are unclear. Consequently, this condition can result in irreversible neurological deficits and serious consequences. In this paper, we present a case of postoperative SEH that developed three days after hematoma evacuation. CASE SUMMARY A 68-year-old man with an American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grade C injury was admitted to our hospital with neck pain and tetraplegia following a fall. The C3-C7 posterior laminectomy and the lateral mass screw fixation surgery were performed on the tenth day. Postoperatively, the patient showed no changes in muscle strength or ASIA grade. The patient experienced neck pain and subcutaneous swelling on the third day postoperatively, his muscle strength decreased, and his ASIA score was grade A. Magnetic resonance imaging showed hypointense signals on T1 weighted image (T1WI) and T2WI located behind the epidural space, with spinal cord compression. Emergency surgical intervention for the hematoma was performed 12 h after onset. Although hypoproteinemia and pleural effusion did not improve in the perioperative period, the patient recovered to ASIA grade C on day 30 after surgery, and was transferred to a functional rehabilitation exercise unit. CONCLUSION This case shows that amelioration of low blood albumin and pleural effusion is an important aspect of the perioperative management of cervical surgery. Surgery to relieve the pressure on the spinal cord should be performed as soon as possible to decrease neurological disabilities.

Clinical and radiological outcomes of n-HA/PA66 cages in anterior spine reconstruction following total en bloc spondylectomy for tumors.

This retrospective monocentric study was conducted to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of the nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide66 (n-HA/PA66) cage in reconstructing the anterior column of the spine following total en bloc spondylectomy (TES). A cohort of 24 patients, 20 diagnosed with primary malignant tumors and 4 with metastatic malignancies, was selected based on specific inclusion criteria. All were subjected to TES and anterior column reconstruction with the n-HA/PA66 cage from January 2013 to July 2023 at a single institution. Pre-operative embolization was performed on all patients. Documented factors included operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, treatment history, and involved level. Mechanical complications and radiological parameters such as the local kyphotic angle (LKA), anterior vertebral height (AVH), posterior vertebral height (PVH), cage subsidence, and bone fusion time were evaluated. Quality of life and neurological function were gauged using tools like the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score, Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) scale, and American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grading. All patients were followed up for 12-127 months, with an average period of 39.71 months. An average operation time of approximately 8.57 h and a blood loss volume of about 1,384 ml were recorded. No instances of tumor recurrence or multiple organ metastases were reported, though recurrence was detected in 2 living patients. Solid fusion was achieved in all patients at a mean time of 6.76 ± 0.69 months. Cage breakage or migration was not observed. Subsidence into the adjacent vertebral bodies was identified in 3 patients but was deemed clinically irrelevant. Significant improvements in VAS, ECOG performance score, KPS scale, and ASIA scores were noted from pre- to post-surgery (P < 0.05). A marked enhancement in the AVH was observed from before surgery to immediately after (P < 0.05). LKA, AVH, and PVH values between postoperative and final follow-up showed no significant variance (P > 0.05). The integration of TES and the n-HA/PA66 cage was found to yield promising clinical and radiological outcomes in anterior column spine reconstruction. The use of this material did not hinder oncological care, including the provision of adjuvant treatments (chemo/radiotherapy), ultimately contributing to the enhanced long-term quality of life for spinal tumor patients.

Nomogram for predicting postoperative deep vein thrombosis in patients with spinal fractures caused by high-energy injuries.

Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is a common complication in patients with spinal fractures caused by high-energy injuries. Early identification of patients at high risk of postoperative DVT is essential for the prevention of thrombosis. This study aimed to develop and validate a prediction model based on a nomogram to predict DVT in patients with spinal fractures caused by high-energy injuries. Clinical data were collected from 936 patients admitted to our hospital between January 2016 and December 2021 with spinal fractures caused by high-energy injuries. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors for postoperative DVT and to develop a nomogram. The predictive performance of the nomogram was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and calibration curve. The incidence of preoperative DVT was 15.38% (144/936). The postoperative incidence of DVT was 20.5% (192/936). The multivariate analysis revealed that age, operation time, blood transfusion, duration of bed rest, American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) score and D-dimer were risk factors for postoperative DVT. The area under the ROC curve of the nomogram was 0.835 and the calibration curve showed good calibration. The nomogram showed a good ability to predict postoperative DVT in patients with spinal fractures caused by high-energy injuries, which may benefit pre- and postoperative DVT prophylaxis strategy development.

Posterior cervical foraminotomy versus anterior cervical discectomy for Cervical Brachialgia: the FORVAD RCT.

Posterior cervical foraminotomy and anterior cervical discectomy are routinely used operations to treat cervical brachialgia, although definitive evidence supporting superiority of either is lacking. The primary objective was to investigate whether or not posterior cervical foraminotomy is superior to anterior cervical discectomy in improving clinical outcome. This was a Phase III, unblinded, prospective, United Kingdom multicentre, parallel-group, individually randomised controlled superiority trial comparing posterior cervical foraminotomy with anterior cervical discectomy. A rapid qualitative study was conducted during the close-down phase, involving remote semistructured interviews with trial participants and health-care professionals. National Health Service trusts. Patients with symptomatic unilateral cervical brachialgia for at least 6 weeks. Participants were randomised to receive posterior cervical foraminotomy or anterior cervical discectomy. Allocation was not blinded to participants, medical staff or trial staff. Health-care use from providing the initial surgical intervention to hospital discharge was measured and valued using national cost data. The primary outcome measure was clinical outcome, as measured by patient-reported Neck Disability Index score 52 weeks post operation. Secondary outcome measures included complications, reoperations and restricted American Spinal Injury Association score over 6 weeks post operation, and patient-reported Eating Assessment Tool-10 items, Glasgow-Edinburgh Throat Scale, Voice Handicap Index-10 items, PainDETECT and Numerical Rating Scales for neck and upper-limb pain over 52 weeks post operation. The target recruitment was 252 participants. Owing to slow accrual, the trial closed after randomising 23 participants from 11 hospitals. The qualitative substudy found that there was support and enthusiasm for the posterior cervical FORaminotomy Versus Anterior cervical Discectomy in the treatment of cervical brachialgia trial and randomised clinical trials in this area. However, clinical equipoise appears to have been an issue for sites and individual surgeons. Randomisation on the day of surgery and processes for screening and approaching participants were also crucial factors in some centres. The median Neck Disability Index scores at baseline (pre surgery) and at 52 weeks was 44.0 (interquartile range 36.0-62.0 weeks) and 25.3 weeks (interquartile range 20.0-42.0 weeks), respectively, in the posterior cervical foraminotomy group (n = 14), and 35.6 weeks (interquartile range 34.0-44.0 weeks) and 45.0 weeks (interquartile range 20.0-57.0 weeks), respectively, in the anterior cervical discectomy group (n = 9). Scores appeared to reduce (i.e. improve) in the posterior cervical foraminotomy group, but not in the anterior cervical discectomy group. The median Eating Assessment Tool-10 items score for swallowing was higher (worse) after anterior cervical discectomy (13.5) than after posterior cervical foraminotomy (0) on day 1, but not at other time points, whereas the median Glasgow-Edinburgh Throat Scale score for globus was higher (worse) after anterior cervical discectomy (15, 7, 6, 6, 2, 2.5) than after posterior cervical foraminotomy (3, 0, 0, 0.5, 0, 0) at all postoperative time points. Five postoperative complications occurred within 6 weeks of surgery, all after anterior cervical discectomy. Neck pain was more severe on day 1 following posterior cervical foraminotomy (Numerical Rating Scale - Neck Pain score 8.5) than at the same time point after anterior cervical discectomy (Numerical Rating Scale - Neck Pain score 7.0). The median health-care costs of providing initial surgical intervention were £2610 for posterior cervical foraminotomy and £4411 for anterior cervical discectomy. The data suggest that posterior cervical foraminotomy is associated with better outcomes, fewer complications and lower costs, but the trial recruited slowly and closed early. Consequently, the trial is underpowered and definitive conclusions cannot be drawn. Recruitment was impaired by lack of individual equipoise and by concern about randomising on the day of surgery. A large prospective multicentre trial comparing anterior cervical discectomy and posterior cervical foraminotomy in the treatment of cervical brachialgia is still required. This trial is registered as ISRCTN10133661. This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 27, No. 21. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Surgical outcome and prognostic factors for 39 recurrent spinal hydatid cysts.

Cystic bone echinococcosis accounts for 0.5-4% of all reported cases, and 45% occur in the spine. Our aim was to review the clinical and radiological features, surgery, and outcomes for 39 patients with recurrent spinal hydatidosis. Thirty-nine reports of patients with recurrent spinal hydatidosis (2011-2020) were followed for an average of 9.28 ± 5.60 months. Lesions occurred in descending order in the; lumbar (48.7%), thoracic (43.6%), and cervical spine (7.7%). Total cyst resection was achieved in 28 of 39 patients (71.8%). Intraoperative cyst rupture occurred in 13 patients (33.3%). The postoperative American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) score was "good" in 82% of patients. Those with "poor" postoperative ASIA scores had a 41% incidence of recurrent thoracic hydatid cysts; further, they demonstrated significantly higher recurrence rates if cysts had ruptured intraoperatively (P = 0.001). In addition, laminectomy, subtotal original cyst resection (P < 0.007), and a thoracic location were all significantly associated with higher recurrence rates (P < 0.04). The majority of patients demonstrated improvement following surgery for cervical hydatid cysts. Notably, those with poor outcomes typically experienced intraoperative ruptures of their thoracic hydatid cysts, contributing to high cyst recurrence rates.

Treatment and outcomes of patients with metastatic spinal cord compression: a double-center study.

Spinal metastases may only affect the bone tissue and result in spinal instability or may additionally result in epidural compression, leading to neurological deficits. Surgery has emerged as a popular method in treating metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) due to the advances in surgical techniques and instrumentation. In this study, we evaluated patients with MESCC regarding neurological status, pain status, and survival rates, and presented our experience managing MESCC. Clinical and radiographic records of 53 patients diagnosed with MESCC between January 2011 and March 2017 were retrospectively evaluated. The study included patients with a pathological diagnosis of primary cancer, those who complained of spinal metastasis, and those who had indications of MESCC on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Bone structure and spinal stability were evaluated using assessed Computed Tomography (CT), and metastatic spread was considered using assessed Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in suitable cases. For each patient, the presence of a tumor compressing the spinal cord, age, gender, preoperative, and postoperative American Spinal Injury Association scores (ASIA), Tokuhashi prognostic score (TPS), affected spinal segment, pathological diagnosis, preoperative, and postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the status of spinal stability, follow-up period, and complications were evaluated. Forty-five patients (82.2% of them were women) underwent surgery with a mean age of 58.29±15.14years. The most frequent type of primary tumor was multiple myeloma (33.9%), followed by lung (24.6%), gastric (7.5%), and prostate (5.7%). The most common site of metastasis was the thoracic region (43.4%), followed by lumbar (24.5%), multiple (24.5%), and cervical (5.7%). The analysis indicated that a significant difference was found between the survival rates of the TPS categories. Common symptoms of MESCC include spinal pain and neurological deficit below the level of the injury. Prompt surgical treatment followed by oncological treatment leads to significant neurological recovery, more prolonged survival, pain relief, and improved quality of life in patients with a short survival time. Oncological treatments, including radiotherapy (RT), should be recommended after surgical treatment.

Neurologic Outcomes After Radiation Therapy for Severe Spinal Cord Compression in Multiple Myeloma: A Study of 162 Patients.

Bone destruction is the most frequent disease-defining clinical feature of multiple myeloma (MM), resulting in skeletal-related events such as back pain, pathological fractures, or neurologic compromise including epidural spinal cord compression (ESCC). Up to 24% of patients with MM will be affected by ESCC. Radiation therapy has been proven to be highly effective in pain relief in patients with MM. However, a critical knowledge gap remains with regard to neurologic outcomes in patients with high-grade ESCC treated with radiation. We retrospectively included 162 patients with MM and high-grade ESCC (grade 2 or 3) who underwent radiation therapy of the spine between January 2010 and July 2021. The primary outcome was the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) score after 12 to 24 months, or the last known ASIA score if the patient had had a repeat treatment or died. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with poor neurologic outcomes after radiation, defined as neurologic deterioration or lack of improvement. After radiation therapy, 34 patients (21%) had no improvement in their impaired neurologic function and 27 (17%) deteriorated neurologically. Thirty-six patients (22%) underwent either surgery or repeat irradiation after the initial radiation therapy. There were 100 patients who were neurologically intact at baseline (ASIA score of E), of whom 16 (16%) had neurologic deterioration. Four variables were independently associated with poor neurologic outcomes: baseline ASIA (odds ratio [OR] = 6.50; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.70 to 17.38; p < 0.001), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (OR = 6.19; 95% CI = 1.49 to 29.49; p = 0.015), number of levels affected by ESCC (OR = 4.02; 95% CI = 1.19 to 14.18; p = 0.026), and receiving steroids prior to radiation (OR = 4.42; 95% CI = 1.41 to 16.10; p = 0.015). Our study showed that 38% of patients deteriorated or did not improve neurologically after radiation therapy for high-grade ESCC. The results highlight the need for multidisciplinary input and efforts in the treatment of high-grade ESCC in patients with MM. Future studies will help to improve patient selection for specific and standardized treatments and to clearly delineate which patients are likely to benefit from radiation therapy. Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Advantages of Short-Segment Fusion in the Surgical Management of Thoracolumbar Traumatic Fractures: A Case Series and Review of the Literature.

Spinetrauma is a commonpathology that frequently requires neurosurgical intervention. Few studies have examined short-segment, 360-degree stabilization of traumatic thoracolumbar fractures. A retrospective review was completed of adult and pediatric patients who underwent surgical correction for thoracolumbar fractures between December 2011 and December 2021. Forty patients met the inclusion criteria. The majority of patients presented with an American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) score of D (n = 11) or E (n = 21). The most common level of injury was L1 (n = 20). The average length of stay was 11.7 days. Postoperatively, two patients had pulmonary emboli or deep venous thrombosis, and two had surgical site infections. Most patients were discharged to home(n = 21) or acute rehab (n = 14). The fusion rate at six months was 97.5%. Neurologically, all patients regained ambulation by>18 months follow-up. For the ASIA scale, most had a score of D (n = 4) or E (n = 32) at six months. The same trend was observed with the Frankel score, where most patients had either D (n = 5) or E (n = 31), improving to only two having a score of D at >18 months. Corpectomy followed by posterior fusion has a number of biomechanical benefits. This construct permits circumferential decompression, larger surface area for fusion, improved reconstitution of vertebral body height, reduced kyphosis, and an overall shorter segment. This results in fewer levels needing to be fused while enabling the greatest changes of successful fusion.

Percutaneous versus open posterior stabilization and decompression in AOSpine-type A3 thoracolumbar fractures with neurological deficit

BackgroundThis retrospective cohort study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between two treatment strategies focusing on non-osteoporotic AOSpine-type A3 fractures of the thoracolumbar spine with neurological deficits at levels T11 to L2.MethodsIn total, 67 patients between 18 and 60 years of age who were treated operatively with either of the two treatment strategies were included. One treatment strategy included open posterior stabilization and decompression, whereas the other was based on percutaneous posterior stabilization and decompression via a tubular retraction system. Demographic data, surgical variables, and further parameters were assessed. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment score, were measured to assess functional outcomes. The regional Cobb angle (CA), the anterior height ratio of the fractured vertebrae (AHRV), and the degree of canal encroachment (DCE) were assessed. The ASIA score was used to assess neurological function recovery. The follow-up period was at least 12 months.ResultsSurgical time and postoperative hospital stay were significantly shorter in the minimally invasive surgery (MIS) group. Intraoperative blood loss was significantly less in the MIS group. Regarding radiological outcome, CA and AHRV at the time of follow-up did not show a significant difference. DCE at the time of follow-up was significantly improved in the MIS group. Lower VAS scores and better ODIs were observed in the MIS group at the 6-month follow-up, but similar outcomes were observed at the 12-month follow-up. The ASIA score was similar between both groups at the 12-month follow-up.ConclusionsBoth treatment strategies are safe and effective; however, MIS could provide earlier pain relief and better functional outcomes compared with OS.

Comparative study of halo-vest reduction and skull traction reduction in the treatment of cervical fracture dislocation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of the halo-vest in the treatment of cervical fracture in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and kyphosis. From May 2017 to May 2021, 36 patients with cervical fractures with AS and thoracic kyphosis were included in this study. The patients with cervical spine fractures with AS underwent preoperative reduction by halo-vest or skull tractions. Instrumentation internal fixation and fusion surgery were then performed. The level of cervical fractures, the operative duration, blood loss, and treatment outcomes were investigated preoperatively and postoperatively. A total of 25 cases were included in the halo-vest group and 11 cases were included in the skull tractions group. The intraoperative blood loss and the surgery duration were significantly less in the halo-vest group than in the skull traction group. A comparison of American Spinal Injury Association scores at admission and final follow-up showed that the neurological function of patients improved in both groups. All patients had reached solid bony fusion during the follow-up. This study presented a unique approach to use halo-vest treatment fixation of unstable cervical fracture in patients with AS. The patient should also have early surgical stabilization with a halo-vest to correct spinal deformity and avoid worsening of neurological status.

Modified Total en Bloc Spondylectomy with Self‐Made Intervertebral Hook Blade in Spinal Tumors: A Retrospective Study

Total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) is an important surgical treatment for spinal tumors that can achieve en bloc resection of the affected vertebral body by using the T-saw. However, the conventional TES process and the surgical instruments currently in use have some inconveniences, which may lead to longer operative times and a higher incidence of complications. To address these obstacles, we developed a modified TES technique using a homemade intervertebral hook blade. The objectives of this study were to describe our modified total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) using a homemade intervertebral hook blade and to assess its clinical effects in patients with spinal tumors. Twenty-three consecutive patients with spinal tumors were included from September 2018 to November 2021. Eleven patients underwent a modified TES using an intervertebral hook blade, and 12 patients underwent a conventional TES using a wire saw. Details of the modified technique for TES were depicted, and the intraoperative blood loss, operative time, and improvement in pain symptom and neurological function measured by visual analog score (VAS) and American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) score of all patients was reviewed and analyzed. Nonparametric analysis of covariates (ANCOVA) was performed to compare the clinical outcomes between patients treated with modified TES and conventional TES. The modified TES significantly reduced operative time (F = 7.935, p = 0.010) and achieved favorable improvement of neurological function (F = 0.570, p = 0.459) and relief of pain (F = 3.196, p = 0.088) compared with the conventional TES group. The mean intraoperative blood loss in the modified TES group (2381.82 ml) was lower than that in the conventional TES group (3558.33 ml), although the difference was not statistically significant (F = 0.677, p = 0.420). Modified TES using the intervertebral hook blade can effectively reduce the operation time and intraoperative bleeding, and meanwhile ensure the improvement of neurological function and relief of pain symptoms, suggesting that this modified technique is feasible, safe, and effective for spinal tumors.

Association between Anterior Surgical Approach and Dysphagia Severity in Patients with Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.

Early detection and management of dysphagia are essential for preventing aspiration pneumonia and reducing mortality in patients with cervical spinal cord injury (C-SCI). In this study, we identified risk factors for dysphagia in patients with C-SCI by analyzing the correlation between the clinical factors and the severity of dysphagia, not the presence or absence of dysphagia. Combined with the analysis results of previous studies, we thought that this additional analysis method could more accurately reveal the risk factors for dysphagia in patients with C-SCI. The presence and severity of dysphagia in patients with C-SCI was evaluated using a modified videofluoroscopic dysphagia scale (mVDS) and penetration-aspiration scale (PAS). All included patients with C-SCI performed a video fluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS). Clinical factors such as age, sex, the presence of tracheostomy, spinal cord independence measure (SCIM), pulmonary function test (PFT), including forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), FVC/FEV1, maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), American Spinal Cord Injury Association (ASIA) score, Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and operation method were investigated. In the multivariate regression analysis, the anterior surgical approach was the only clinical factor that had a significant correlation in both mVDS and PAS, which represents the severity of dysphagia in C-SCI patients (p < 0.05). The anterior surgical approach was correlated with the severity of dysphagia in patients with C-SCI. Considering this, as one of the risk factors affecting dysphagia in patients with C-SCI, surgical method may also need to be considered. Additionally, we recommend that clinicians should pay particular attention to the potential for development of dysphagia in patients who received anterior cervical surgery. However, further prospective studies with larger sample sizes are needed for more accurate generalization.

A Novel Stepwise Technique for Safe and Effective Transoral Release of Irreducible Atlantoaxial Dislocation: A Retrospective Study of 201 cases.

Retrospective cohort study. To verify the clinical efficacy of a novel Transoral Stepwise Release Technique (TSRT) for treatment of irreducible atlantoaxial dislocations (IAAD). Anterior release for IAAD remains challenging, with 3.2 times higher complication rate than posterior release. However, there are some patients who cannot achieve successful reduction from a posterior approach, and require the higher-risk anterior release. Our work presents a novel anterior release technique that aims to minimize iatrogenic injury and associated complications from an anterior release. IAAD cases who were treated with TSRT were retrospectively studied. Primary outcomes included fusion rate, complications, and neurological function over the course of minimum one-year follow-up. Radiographic differences between preoperative and postoperative imaging were also considered. A preoperative prediction model for the actual release grade was developed using multivariate logistic regression based on demographic factors and the craniovertebral abnormalities identified on preoperative images, evaluating the need for higher-grade TSRT release. We included 201 IAAD cases, with 42% (84/201) demonstrating degeneration of the atlantoaxial joint or anterior-hook-like dens. Reduction was achieved in all cases, with 80% (160/201) of cases only requiring relatively low-grade (grade I) TSRT release. Degeneration of the atlantoaxial joint was significantly associated with the need for higher-grade TSRT release (OR 16.68, CI: 2.91-94.54, P=0.002). The overall complication rate was 4.5% (9/201). Over the course of follow-up, the fusion rate reached 98.5%, and the ASIA and JOA score were significantly improved to 97.28 and 16.25 (P<0.01 and P<0.01), respectively. This study demonstrated that our novel TSRT anterior release technique demonstrated complication rates similar to those published in the literature for posterior release. TSRT can be used as an alternative to posterior release techniques for refractory cases or when a posterior approach is not considered viable.

Obstetric and Neonatal Outcomes in People Who Acquired a Spinal Cord Injury During Pregnancy

ObjectiveThe objectives of this study were to determine the obstetric and neonatal outcomes of people who acquired spinal cord injuries (SCI) during pregnancy. MethodsThis is part of an international observational questionnaire examining pregnancy outcomes of people with SCI. The outcome measures included demographics, level of injury and American Spinal Injury Association scores, prenatal and postnatal complications, and neonatal outcomes. ResultsOf 780 responses, 14 (1.79%) participants reported acquiring an SCI while pregnant. 64.2% (9/14) of injuries were due to trauma. Of 14 pregnancies, 1 person miscarried, and 3 pregnancies were terminated. There were 11 live births. One participant had twins and 9 live births were singletons. Six participants delivered vaginally, 3 had a cesarean delivery and 1 was unreported. The preterm birth rate was 54.5% (6/11). Approximately 36% (4/11) of newborns were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit. The average birth weight reported was 2409.7 g (456.3 g–3458.6 g). Forty percent (4/10) of participants reported experiencing postpartum blues or depression. Sixty percent (6/10) of participants breastfed for over 2 weeks. ConclusionsThis is the largest known cohort to date of persons acquiring SCI during pregnancy. The most common cause of SCI was a motor vehicle accident. Complications included preterm birth and neonatal intensive care unit admission. People who have an SCI during pregnancy are at risk for complications; however, positive pregnancy and neonatal outcomes are possible. Absolute small numbers of this event limit the ability to assess incidence of outcomes.

Demographics, Mechanism of Injury, and Outcomes for Acute Upper and Lower Cervical Spinal Cord Injuries: An Analysis of 470 Patients in the Prospective, Multi-Center, North American Clinical Trials Network Registry.

There is a paucity of data comparing the demographics, mechanism of injury, and outcomes of upper versus lower cervical spinal cord injuries (cSCI). The study objective was to define different clinical manifestations of cSCI. Data were collected prospectively through centers of the North American Clinical Trials Network (NACTN). Data was collected on 470 patients (21% women, mean age 50 years). Cervical vertebral level was analyzed as an ordinal variable to determine a natural demarcation to classify upper versus lower cSCI. For continuous variable analysis, falls were associated with C3 more than C4 vertebral level injuries (60% vs. 42%; p = 0.0126), while motor vehicle accidents were associated with C4 more than C3 (40% vs. 29%; p = 0.0962). Motor International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury scores also demonstrated a natural demarcation between C3 and C4, with C3 having higher median American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor scores (40 [4-73] vs. 11 [3-59], p = 0.0227). There were no differences when comparing C2 to C3 nor C4 to C5. Given the significant differences seen between C3 and C4, but not C2 and C3 nor C4 and C5, upper cSCI was designated as C1-C3, and lower cSCI was designated as C4-C7. Compared with a lower cSCI, patients with an upper cSCI were more likely to have a fall as their mechanism of injury (54% vs. 36%; p = 0.0072). Patients with an ASIA C cSCI were likely to have an upper cervical injury: 23% vs. 11% (p = 0.0226). Additionally, patients with an upper cSCI were more likely to have diabetes prior to injury: 37% versus 22%, respectively (p = 0.0084). Lower cSCI were more likely injured through sports (19% vs. 8%, p = 0.0171) and present with ASIA A (42% vs. 25%, p = 0.0186) neurological grade. Patients with lower cSCI were also significantly more likely to have complications such as shock, pulmonary embolism, and pleural effusion. In conclusion, there appears to be a natural demarcation of injury type between C3 and C4. Upper cSCI (C1-C3) was more associated with falls and diabetes, whereas lower cSCI (C4-C7) was more associated with sports, worse ASIA scores, and more complications. Further research will be needed to understand the mechanistic and biological differences between these two groups and whether different treatments may be appropriate for each of these groups.

Correlation between presence of traumatic disco-ligamentous injuries as an MRI finding with the results of management of thoracolumbar and lumbar injuries

Introduction: Radiographic study plays an important role in diagnosis of acute vertebral injuries and helps in proper management of those patients. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the modality of choice for evaluation of ligamentous and other soft tissue structures, disc, spinal cord and occult osseous injuries. Due to high cost, it is necessary to detect the best use of this technique in the evaluation of thoracolumbar spinal injuries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the importance of MRI as indicators for vertebral ligamentous injuries and intervertebral disc injuries or herniation in management of thoracolumbar and lumbar fractures. Methods: Retrospective study using radiological measurements. Seventy-two patients with thoracolumbar and lumbar fractures were included. Radiographic parameters detected were percentage of compression, kyphosis angle, vertebral translation and scoliosis angle. Computed tomography was used to detect the degree of spinal canal narrowing, MRI was used to evaluate the condition of posterior ligamentous complex and intervertebral disc injury or herniation. American Spinal Injury Association score was recorded. Results: There were 83% AO spine type A, 6% AO spine type B and 11% AO spine type C. Correlation between fracture type and neurological status with the posterior ligamentous complex injury was found to be significant: ( P = 0.0143 and P = 0.0344, respectively). Degree of vertebral body compression, kyphosis and scoliosis angles, vertebral body translation and spinal canal narrowing were found to be insignificant in correlation with posterior ligamentous complex injuries. Correlation of the above-mentioned parameters with disc injury or herniation was found to be insignificant except for kyphotic angle that was found to be significant in correlation with posttraumatic disc herniation ( P = 0.0219). Conclusion: MRI finding is of great value in management plan of thoracolumbar and lumbar fractures. Injury of posterior ligamentous complex is significantly correlated with fracture severity and the neurological function. But the intervertebral disc injury or herniation was not correlated to them except that the disc herniation was significantly correlated to kyphosis angle.

Emergency Treatment of Cervical Vertebromedullary Trauma: 10 Years of Experience and Outcome Evaluation.

The aim of the study is to identify and validate, through the recording of clinical and radiological data, the different surgical approaches and treatments valid for most subaxial cervical dislocation fractures and whether there is an advantage from using an anterior approach rather than a posterior approach and conversely.. A retrospective study was carried out analyzing the case history of the last 10 years of vertebromedullary traumas treated at the spine surgery unit of the Policlinico Gemelli in Rome. Data on surgical timing, American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) scores for neurological damage, and subsequent assessments on recovery, survival, and mortality were also examined. A total of 80 patients were treated: 50 by the posterior approach, 24 by the anterior approach, and six by the double approach. Our average follow-up time was 4.2 years. A prevalence of surgery with the posterior approach was noted. We observed the worsening of cervical kyphosis about 15 months after the trauma in two cases treated with the posterior approach alone. A second surgical treatment was performed in these patients. One of these patients underwent an anterior fusion; the other case underwent a posterior revision because the patient had ankylosing spondylitis. Although we found no statistically significant difference in outcomes between the various surgical treatments, in this retrospective study, we analyzed the characteristics and outcomes of cervical spine injuries that required surgical treatment. The aim of surgery in unstable cervical spine injuries should be to reduce and stabilize the damaged segment, maintain lordosis, and decompress when indicated. The optimal choice of surgical approach and treatment, or its superiority in terms of outcomes, remains a debated issue.