American College Of Cardiology And American Heart Association Research Articles

British Society for Haematology guideline for anticoagulantmanagement of pregnant individuals with mechanical heart valves.

British Society for Haematology guideline for anticoagulantmanagement of pregnant individuals with mechanical heart valves.

Trends in Provision of Medications and Lifestyle Counseling in Ambulatory Settings by Gender and Race for Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease, 2006-2016

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) continues to be highly prevalent in the US. The 2013 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) treatment guidelines reevaluated evidence-based practices for reduction of ASCVD in men and women from high-quality randomized trials and meta-analyses recommending the use of statin therapy, aspirin prescription, and lifestyle counseling for adults with ASCVD. Population trends in secondary prevention strategies for patients with ASCVD among primary care settings is currently lacking, limiting ability to evaluate impact of guideline implementation. To examine temporal and sociodemographic trends in secondary prevention strategies in patients with ASCVD between 2006 and 2016 in a nationally representative, ambulatory care database. This cross-sectional study analyzed data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS), which is an annual survey conducted to represent the national US population and contains information on ambulatory office-based patient visits, including medical conditions, services provided, and demographic characteristics. Participants were adults aged 21 years and older with prevalent ASCVD identified via International Classification of Disease codes between 2006 and 2016. Data were extracted and analyzed in March 2021. Data were separated by calendar year pre-2013 (2006 to 2013) and post-2013 (2014 to 2016). Outcomes included statin therapy, aspirin prescription, and lifestyle counseling (eg, nutrition, exercise, weight reduction) service provided at clinic visits. There were 11 033 visits for adults with ASCVD, representing a weighted total of 275.3 million visits nationwide; 40.7% (112.1 million [weighted]) were women, 9.2% (25.4 million [weighted]) were Hispanic, 9.9% (19.0 million [weighted]) were non-Hispanic Black, 90.1% (172.7 million [weighted]) were non-Hispanic White, and 40.6% (112.1 million [weighted]) were from cardiology clinics. Of 11 033 patient visits, 5507 patients (49.9%) were prescribed statin therapy, 5165 patients (46.8%) were using aspirin, 2233 patients (20.2%) received lifestyle counseling. Statin therapy increased from 9.3 million individuals (45.3%) in 2006 to 14.9 million individuals (46.5%) in 2016, and aspirin prescriptions increased from 8.5 million individuals (41.3%) in 2006 to 15.2 individuals (47.5%) in 2016. Women were less likely than men to receive medications for secondary prevention: among women, 48.8 million (43.3%) received statins (vs 85.9 million men [52.7%]), 44.7 million (39.8%) received aspirin (vs 79.1 million men [48.5%]), and 25.7 million (22.9%) received lifestyle counseling services (vs 37.5 million men [23.0%]). These findings suggest only modest increases in statin and aspirin prescription since 2006; however, lifestyle counseling use decreased in recent years. Women and Black patients continued to be less likely to receive secondary prevention ASCVD treatment. Adherence to guideline-directed secondary prevention recommendations remained low (less than 50%) in patients with ASCVD, especially with regards to lifestyle counseling, suggesting the need for more implementation research.

Chronic hypertension and risk of preterm delivery: National Longitudinal Study of Adolescents to Adult Health.

Chronic hypertension during pregnancy is associated with increased risk of adverse birth outcomes. In 2017, the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) lowered thresholds to classify hypertension in non-pregnant adults to SBP≥130mmHg and DBP≥80mmHg (ie stage I hypertension), resulting in an additional 4.5-million reproductive-aged women meeting criteria for hypertension. Little is known about effects of pre-pregnancy blood pressure (BP) in this range. To examine the effect of pre-pregnancy maternal BP on preterm delivery. We analysed the data from two waves of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health, including participants that had measured BP at Wave IV (2008-09) and a pregnancy that resulted in a singleton live birth between Waves IV and V (2016-18; n=2038). We categorised BP using ACC/AHA cut-offs: normal (SBP<120mmHg and DBP<80mmHg), elevated (SBP 120-129mmHg and DBP<80mmHg), hypertension stage I (SBP 130-139mmHg or DBP 80-89mmHg) and hypertension stage II (SBP≥140mmHg or DBP≥90mmHg). We estimated risk ratios (RR) with log-binomial regression adjusting for maternal demographics, anthropometrics and medication use. The prevalence of preterm delivery was 12.6%. A standard deviation (SD) increment in SBP (SD=12.2mmHg) and DBP (SD=9.3mmHg) was associated with a 14% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2, 27) and 20% (95% CI 4, 37) higher risk of preterm delivery. Compared to normotensive controls, stage I (RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.01, 1.74) and stage II (RR 1.34, 95% CI 0.89, 2.00) hypertension were associated with increased risk. We observed greater risk of preterm delivery among women with higher pre-pregnancy BP. Women with stage I hypertension during pregnancy may benefit from increased BP monitoring. Additional studies on the utility of foetal surveillance in this group are warranted.

Abstract 11733: Gender Differences in Statin Prescriptions for Secondary Prevention in Ambulatory Settings

Introduction: The American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) 2013 guidelines recommend statin medications and lifestyle counselling for patients with a history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). There is limited data regarding statin prescriptions and lifestyle counselling for secondary prevention in ambulatory settings. We aimed to examine temporal trends in primary care usage of recommended secondary prevention strategies among men and women with ASCVD in a nationally representative, ambulatory care database. Methods: The National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) provides measures of ambulatory medical care services used in the United States. The study sample consisted of adults with ASCVD seen in ambulatory care clinics from 2006-2016. We analyzed the proportion of patients receiving secondary prevention strategies, statin medications or lifestyle counseling (including weight reduction, diet, and exercise) and examined differences by gender. Patient sample weights were applied to enable nationally representative estimates. Results: From 2006-2016, there were 7263 total outpatient visits (representing 179.9 million visits) for adults with a history of ASCVD. Average age was 63 (SD, 10), 37% were women. Statin prescriptions ranged from 44% (2006) to 46% (2016). Lifestyle counselling was also recommended very infrequently (16-34% range). Women were less likely than men to receive statins. For example, in 2016 men received statins 49% of the time compared with only 41 % in women. Following 2013 AHA/ACC guidelines, men had a 9% increase in statin prescriptions while for women it increased only 5%. Lifestyle counseling decreased from 25% to 23% post-2013, men decreasing by 6% and women increasing by 5%. Nutrition and exercise counseling was done only in 21% and 13% of the visits in 2016. Conclusion: Despite the ACC/AHA guidelines emphasis on statin use and lifestyle recommendations for secondary prevention in high risk ASCVD patients, the overall rates in ambulatory care remain low. Women were less likely to receive these preventive measures.

The 2017 ACC/AHA stage 1 hypertension is associated with arterial stiffness: a prospective analysis.

Objective: To examine the association between stage 1 hypertension defined by the 2017 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guideline and risk of developing arterial stiffness.Methods: During 2010-2015, 4595 adults aged ≥40 years without cardiovascular disease were followed up for a median of 4.3 years. BP levels at baseline were categorized into normal, elevated, stage 1 hypertension, and stage 2 hypertension. The development of arterial stiffness was defined as a normal brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (ba-PWV) at baseline and an increased ba-PWV at follow-up.Results: Compared with participants with normal BP, participants with stage 1 hypertension had a 1.48-fold increased risk of developing arterial stiffness [odds ratio (OR) =2.48; 95% confidence interval (CI) =1.59-3.85] after adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors. The association was more evident in adults aged 40-59 years (OR =4.08; 95% CI =2.06-8.08) than that in those aged ≥60 years (OR =1.47; 95% CI =0.81-2.67). A systolic BP 130~139 mmHg was significantly associated with arterial stiffness independent of diastolic BP (OR =2.90; 95% CI =1.86-4.52). Stage 1 hypertension either at baseline or at follow-up was associated with increased risks compared with normal BP at both baseline and follow-up.Conclusions: The 2017 ACC/AHA stage 1 hypertension was significantly associated with higher risks of arterial stiffness.

Aspirin Alone Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The current American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines recommend dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and clopidogrel for 6months followed by lifelong aspirin after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, studies that have DAPT with aspirin following TAVR have questioned this recommendation as DAPT has been associated with more bleeding events compared to aspirin. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all the RCTs comparing DAPT (aspirin plus clopidogrel) with aspirin alone as antithrombotic treatment following transcatheter aortic valve replacement. The databases of Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane library were searched from inception to Oct 1, 2020, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting aspirin plus clopidogrel with aspirin alone as antithrombotic treatment after TAVI were included. Revman 5.3 was used to conduct the analysis. After screening 152 articles, four studies involving 1086 patients (541 patients in the aspirin group and 545 patients in the DAPT group) were included. The results demonstrated that, at 30days follow-up, compared with DAPT, aspirin was not associated with a statistically significant difference in the rate of bleeding events (RR = 1.22, 95% CI 0.62 to 2.39, P = 0.57), all-cause mortality (RR = 1.21, 95% CI 0.52 to 2.84, P = 0.66), stroke (RR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.24 to 2.79, P = 0.74), and MI (RR = 4.00, 95% CI 0.45 to 35.22, P = 0.21). However, at the 6 to 12months follow-up, DAPT appeared to increase the risk of bleeding events compared with aspirin alone (RR = 1.67, 95% CI 1.24 to 2.24, P < 0.001), and there was no significant difference in the rate of all-cause mortality (RR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.48, P = 0.65), stroke (RR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.92, P = 0.90), and MI (RR = 1.65, 95% CI 0.52 to 5.26, P = 0.40) among the two groups. Our systematic review and meta-analysis suggested that aspirin alone could decrease the risk of bleeding and was not associated with higher risk of mortality, stroke or myocardial infarction compared with DAPT.

Mediterranean, vegetarian and vegan diets as practical outtakes of EAS and ACC/AHA recommendations for lowering lipid profile.

Reduction of total cholesterol (TC) and LDL fraction (LDL-C) may be beneficial towards decreasing the risk of development of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). First and foremost, before implementing orsimultaneously with pharmacological treatment, patients should be informed about lifestyle changes that may be critical to achieving a better lipid profile. Recommendations from ACC/AHA (American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association) and EAS (European Atherosclerosis Society) mainly focus on limitation of saturated fatty acids (SFA) and trans fatty acids (TFA) consumption, but additional support could be considered. This review presents selected guidelines of European scientific societies concerning lipid metabolism disorders. The main aim of this manuscript was to present the guidelines how to provide simple and transparent schemes of management in dyslipidemia therapy. Encouraging patients for increasing the intake of soluble fiber (SF) and phytosterols (PS) may also be promoted for achieving therapeutic goals. In the clinical point of view, restoring an appropriate lipid profile is important because it directly reduces the risk of developing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). The EAS and ACC/AHA guidelines introduce several new demands, so far absent from previous recommendations. Mediterranean diet (MD) or vegetarian lifestyles are an example of diet patterns that are deliberated as healthy for cardio-vascular system, since both consist of fresh, unprocessed vegetables and fruits with addition of desirable fats.

LDL-cholesterol change and goal attainment following statin intensity titration among Asians in primary care: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundClinical trials have demonstrated that either initiating or up-titrating a statin dose substantially reduce Low-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. However, statin adherence in actual practice tends to be suboptimal, leading to diminished effectiveness. This study aims to use real-world data to determine the effect on LDL-C levels and LDL-C goal attainment rates, when selected statins are titrated in Asian patients.MethodsA retrospective cohort study over a 5-year period, from April 2014 to March 2019 was conducted on a cohort of multi-ethnic adult Asian patients with clinical diagnosis of Dyslipidaemia in a primary care clinic in Singapore. The statins were classified into low-intensity (LI), moderate-intensity (MI) and high-intensity (HI) groups according to the 2018 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Blood Cholesterol Guidelines. Patients were grouped into “No statin”, “Non-titrators” and “Titrators” cohorts based on prescribing patterns. For the “Titrators” cohort, the mean percentage change in LDL-C and absolute change in LDL-C goal attainment rates were computed for each permutation of statin intensity titration.ResultsAmong the cohort of 11,499 patients, with a total of 266,762 visits, there were 1962 pairs of LDL-C values associated with a statin titration. Initiation of LI, MI and HI statin resulted in a lowering of LDL-C by 21.6% (95%CI = 18.9–24.3%), 28.9% (95%CI = 25.0–32.7%) and 25.2% (95%CI = 12.8–37.7%) respectively. These were comparatively lower than results from clinical trials (30 to 63%). The change of LDL-C levels due to up-titration, down-titration, and discontinuation were − 12.4% to − 28.9%, + 13.2% to + 24.6%, and + 18.1% to + 32.1% respectively. The improvement in LDL-C goal attainment ranged from 26.5% to 47.1% when statin intensity was up-titrated.ConclusionIn this study based on real-world data of Asian patients in primary care, it was shown that although statin titration substantially affected LDL-C levels and LDL-C goal attainment rates, the magnitude was lower than results reported from clinical trials. These results should be taken into consideration and provide further insight to clinicians when making statin adjustment recommendations in order to achieve LDL-C targets in clinical practice, particularly for Asian populations.

941. Incarcerated patients living with HIV: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk and management

BackgroundThe 2018 American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) 2018 Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol included human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) as an atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk enhancer for the first time. Our study investigates if patients living with HIV in the Illinois Department of Corrections (IDOC) were prescribed appropriate HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (statin) therapy following release of these guidelines based on risk.MethodsThis was a retrospective study of patients with > 1 visit in our multidisciplinary HIV IDOC Telemedicine Clinic from 1/1/19-6/1/19. Our prescriptive authority is limited to HIV and directly related conditions, and we provide recommendations to on-site providers for other comorbidities. Included patients were > 18 years of age, HIV positive, and incarcerated within IDOC. Excluded patients had existing ASCVD. Data from the first visit in the study period were extracted from the electronic medical record and analyzed utilizing descriptive statistics. Primary objectives were to quantify ASCVD risk and appropriate statin use in our population.ResultsOf the 158 patients included, average age was 42 years. The majority were male (89%), Black (73%), overweight/obese (117/148, 79%), on an integrase single-tablet regimen (78%), with CD4 >200 cells/µL (97%), and HIV RNA < 20 copies/mL (85%). Of the 18 females, 8 were transgender. Within the prior year, 65% had a lipid panel. For the 50 patients meeting criteria for 10-year ASCVD estimation, median (range) risk was 6.6% (0.8% - 31.9%). Only 12 patients were on statins. Of these, all were indicated per AHA/ACC guidelines with 10 prescribed appropriate intensity. An additional 45 patients had indications for statins but were untreated. In total, 47 patients (30%) were not receiving appropriate statin therapy.ConclusionResults of our study suggest ASCVD risk management is an area of improvement for inmates living with HIV, especially as we look towards caring for an aging HIV population. Future directions include comparing these data to data from a later time point to evaluate time for guideline uptake.DisclosuresThomas D. Chiampas, PharmD, BCPS, AAHIVP, Gilead (Employee)

Secular trends of hypertension prevalence based on 2017 ACC/AHA and 2018 Chinese hypertension guidelines: Results from CHNS data (1991-2015).

This study aimed to assess the impact of the 2017 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guideline and the 2018 Chinese hypertension guidelines on the different secular trends for hypertension prevalence. A total of 82 665 eligible individuals aged ≥20 years were selected from nine cross‐sectional study periods (1991‐2015) from the China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS). Over the 24‐year period, the long‐term trend for the prevalence of the 2017 ACC/AHA‐defined age‐adjusted hypertension showed an increase from 32.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 31.0%‐33.3%) in 1991 to 60.0% (95% CI: 58.6%‐61.3%) in 2015 (P trend < 0.001). According to the 2018 Chinese guideline for hypertension, the weighted hypertension prevalence increased from 10.0% (95% CI: 9.4%‐10.5%) in 1991 to 28.7% (95% CI: 27.9%‐29.6%) in 2015 (P trend < 0.001). However, slopes of increasing prevalence of hypertension were significantly greater according to the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline than that based on Joint National Committee (JNC 7) report (β = 1.00% vs β = 0.67% per year, respectively, P = 0.041). Based on the 2017 ACC/AHA definition, the prevalence of stage 1 hypertension and elevated blood pressure significantly increase from 22.3% and 6.9% in 1991 to 31.2% and 10.1% in 2015 (all P < 0.05), respectively. The secular trend for the prevalence of hypertension according to the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline showed a greater rate of increase compared with the prevalence based on the 2018 Chinese hypertension guidelines. Public health initiatives should focus on the current status of hypertension in China because of the possible high prevalence of hypertension and concomitant vascular risks.

Cardiovascular risk and undertreatment of dyslipidemia in lung cancer survivors: A nationwide population-based study

BackgroundIn lung cancer survivors, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of noncancer deaths. Nonetheless, there is lack of information on management of dyslipidemia, a major risk factor for future CVD events, in lung cancer survivors. This study aimed to assess dyslipidemia management and prevalence of statin eligibility in lung cancer survivors. MethodsFrom the Korean National Health Insurance Service database, we selected 7349 lung cancer survivors who received surgery for lung cancer from 2007 to 2014. We used descriptive statistics for analyses of dyslipidemia management status on the basis of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. We also identified those who met the criteria for treatment on the basis of CVD risk according to the 2018 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines. ResultsThe overall awareness and treatment rates for lung cancer survivors with dyslipidemia were 31.8% and 29.7%, respectively. The overall control rate for those receiving treatment was 88.7%, but was lowest in the highest risk group (78.1%). Furthermore, undertreatment of dyslipidemia was more prominent in young, male lung cancer survivors and those diagnosed with lung cancer within 3 years. Among those not receiving treatment for dyslipidemia, 61.7% were indicated for statin according to the ACC/AHA guidelines. ConclusionOver half of lung cancer survivors were not receiving treatment, although they were eligible for statin under current guidelines. To reduce noncancer mortality, statin use and adequate management of CVD risk factors should be encouraged in lung cancer survivors.

Assessment of the Efficacy of Lowering LDL Cholesterol with Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Four Korean Statin Benefit Groups as per ACC/AHA Guidelines (NewStaR4G).

The American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines identified four statin benefit groups on the basis of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk reduction and proposed statin therapy by evidence-based intensity. Although these guidelines used randomized controlled trials with hard outcomes as exclusive evidence for its recommendations, a limited number of studies conducted in Asian countries makes its application of treatment strategy, intensity, and statin doses uncertain in these population. This prospective, multicenter study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of rosuvastatin 10 mg in the four statin benefit groups requiring high- or moderate-intensity statin therapy according to the ACC/AHA guidelines in the Korean population. The primary endpoint was percentage reduction in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. Secondary endpoints were percentage reduction in other lipids and achievement of ≥50% reduction in LDL cholesterol. Rosuvastatin 10 mg lowered LDL cholesterol by 61.4 mg/dL, a 44.9% decrease from baseline after eight weeks. Reduction of LDL cholesterol ≥50% was achieved in 46.3% of patients. Rosuvastatin 10 mg was generally well tolerated. In the Korean population, rosuvastatin 10 mg was favorable and tolerant in lowering LDL cholesterol in the four statin benefit groups requiring high- or moderate-intensity statin therapy according to the ACC/AHA guidelines.

Pharmacists' Utilization of Non-HDL-C Levels in Managing Patients With Lipid Disorders.

Background: Since 2013 there have been cholesterol guideline changes impacting pharmacists' clinical practice in managing lipid disorders. For more than a decade, cholesterol management was based on the National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol Adult Treatment Panel III guideline, highlighting non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) as a secondary target in persons with triglycerides ≥200 mg/dL, after low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment. The 2013 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guideline differed from the traditional management of dyslipidemia, in part no longer emphasizing the utilization of non-HDL-C levels. Objective: To measure pharmacists' attitudes and behavior regarding utilization of non-HDL-C level calculation before and after the inception of the 2013 ACC/AHA cholesterol guideline. Methods: Pharmacists in the American College of Clinical Pharmacy ambulatory care listserv participated in an electronic survey in November 2013, before the inception of the 2013 ACC/AHA guideline, and again in October 2018. Results: We collected 391 usable responses from participants; 212 responses in 2013 and 179 responses in 2018. The before and after comparison revealed that respondents in 2013 reported significantly higher frequency of calculating non-HDL-C levels (mean = 1.88, SD = 0.80) than respondents in 2018 (mean = 1.66, SD = 0.79) (P ≤ .001). Also, the frequency that non-HDL-C level calculation alters decisions regarding course of treatment was lower in the 2018 (mean = 3.50, SD = 1.06) in comparison with 2013 (mean = 3.77, SD = 0.88) (P ≤ .05). Furthermore, pharmacists were more favorable toward the inclusion of non-HDL-C level calculation in 2018 (mean = 3.77, SD = 1.05) than in 2013 (mean = 3.13, SD = 1.33) (P ≤ .001). Conclusion and Relevance: Clinical pharmacists' utilization of non-HDL-C levels in the clinical management of patients with hypercholesterolemia has decreased, highlighting the need for further education on the importance of evaluating non-HDL-C levels in the very high-risk atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease population.

Request for an Andexxa Value Analysis.

This perspective is a formal request to the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) to perform a value analysis on andexanet (Andexxa) similar to what was completed for the PCSK9 inhibitors in the 2018 ACC/AHA Blood Cholesterol guidelines. Based on the safety and efficacy concerns of andexanet alfa, a value statement in and or as an addendum to society guidelines is vital considering the high cost of therapy. In this era of ever-increasing health care costs, every clinician, health system, national society, insurer, and pharmaceutical company should work to be good stewards of our society's resources.

322 Do Current Best Practice Guidelines Support the Divide between Rebatable and Non-Rebatable Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Scans?

Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is increasingly referenced in guidelines from the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). However, Medicare Rebate Scheme (MBS) eligibility remains limited. We aimed to compare the difference between 1) strength of guideline recommendations and 2) level of evidence between MBS rebatable and non-rebatable scans. Keyword searching for CMR of all ESC and ACC guidelines was performed. CMR requests from a Western Sydney tertiary hospital from Feb/2018 to Feb/2020 were assessed as either a) as per ACC/ESC recommendations (≥level IIa) or as per current evidence (≥level B). Only guidelines explicitly specifying CMR were included. MBS rebatable and non-rebatable studies were then compared using Chi-Sq analysis. A total of 144 CMR requests (83:61 male:female) were assessed, 114 (78.5%) of which met ACC/ESC CMR use guidelines. However, only 19 (13.5%) were MBS rebatable, with 9 (47.3%) of these meeting ACC/ESC guidelines. Level of recommendation ≥IIa was found in 64% of non-rebatable and 42% of rebatable scans (p=0.059). The proportion of level of evidence ≥level B was similar between rebatable (15.4%) and non-rebatable (10.6%) scans (p=0.40). Our data demonstrate that non-rebatable scans tend to have higher level of recommendation as per guidelines with a result approaching statistical significance. There was no difference in level of evidence between rebatable and non-rebatable scans. A nation-wide study is needed to inform funding models for CMR which are guided by best evidence and levels of recommendation.

A New Cholesterol Treatment Guideline

A 2013 guideline from the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) suggested statin therapy for primary prevention if a

Trends in Guideline-Driven Revascularization in Diabetic Patients with Multivessel Coronary Heart Disease.

In diabetes patients with chronic ≥3 vessel disease, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) holds a class I recommendation in the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) 2011 guidelines, and this classification has not changed to date. Much of the literature has focused upon whether CABG or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) produces better outcomes; there is a paucity of data comparing the odds of receiving these procedures. A secondary analysis was conducted in a de-identified database comprised of 30,482 patients satisfying the entry criteria. Odds of occurrence (CABG, PCI) were determined as the binary dependent variable in period 1, (17 October 2009 through 31 December 2011), and period 2 (1 January 2013 through 16 March 2015), before and after the 2011 guidelines, while controlling for gender, ethnicity/race, and ischemic heart disease as covariates. The odds of performing CABG rather than PCI in period 2 were not statistically significantly different than in period 1 (p = 0.400). The logistic regression model chi-square statistic was statistically significant, with χ2 (7) = 308.850, p < 0.0001. The Wald statistic showed that ethnicity/race (African American, Caucasian, Hispanic and Other), gender, and heart disease contributed significantly to the prediction model with p < 0.05, but ethnicity ‘Unknown’ did not. The odds of CABG versus PCI in period 2 were 0.98 times those in period 1 95% confidence interval (CI) = (0.925, 1.032), statistically controlling for covariates. There was no significant rise in the odds of undergoing a CABG among this dataset of high-risk patients with diabetes and multivessel coronary heart disease. Modern practice has evolved regarding patient choice and additional variables that impact the final revascularization method employed. The degree to which odds of occurrence of procedures are a reliable surrogate for provider compliance with guidelines remains uncertain.

P643Association of adherence and treatment intensity of lipid-lowering therapy with cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality in very high-risk patients in Germany

Abstract Introduction Both intensity and adherence to lipid lowering therapies (LLT) play an important role in effectiveness of the therapies in patients at risk for cardiovascular events. Purpose To evaluate the association of adherence and treatment intensity with cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality in very high-risk patients (as defined by the current ESC guidelines) treated with statin and/or ezetimibe. Methods Retrospective cohort study was based on German health claims data (2010–2015) obtained from German Institute for Health Research (InGef) database and included patients ≥18 years with an initial LLT treatment (statin and/or ezetimibe) in 2011–2013, and diagnoses of cardiovascular disease (CVD), stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) or type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). Patients must have had at least 2 LLT prescriptions in the first year to ensure intention of treatment. Follow-up period started 1 year after the second LLT prescription and continued until one of the events of the composite study endpoint (hospitalisation for myocardial infarction, unstable angina, ischemic stroke, heart failure, revascularization, or all-cause death) or 31.12.2015, whichever occurred earlier. Adherence was measured annually by the proportion of days covered (PDC) using prescription data. Treatment intensity was quantified based on expected LDL-C reduction as described in the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) 2018 guidelines. Adherence and treatment intensity were multiplied to create a combined measure of intensity after accounting for adherence. Results 73,257 patients of the CVD cohort were 68 (SD=12) years old, 59% men; the DM cohort (no CVD) had 13,584 patients, age 64 (10), 47% men; 472 patients in the CKD cohort (no CVD) were 65 (15) years old, 46% men. In a Cox proportional hazards model, each 10% increase in treatment intensity (LDL-C lowering) was associated with 18% lower risk of CV event in the CVD (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.82–0.83), 21% - in the DM (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.76–0.83), and 15% - in the CKD (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.75–0.97) cohorts. Similarly, each 10% increase in adherence (PDC) was associated with 6% lower risk of CV event in the CVD (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.93–0.94), 7% - in the DM (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.91–0.94), and 7% - in the CKD (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.89–0.97) cohorts. Each 10% increase in adherence-adjusted intensity was associated with 16% lower risk of CV event in the CVD (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.83 - 0.85), 19% - in the DM (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.78–0.85), and 17% - in the CKD (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72–0.96) cohorts. The models controlled for age, sex, Charlson comorbidity index and other cardiovascular risk factors at baseline. Conclusions A higher adherence and/or treatment intensity of LLT was associated with significantly lower risk of CV outcomes or all-cause death in German very high-risk patients. Strategies to tailor intensity to patient profile and improve adherence could further lower risk of CV events. Acknowledgement/Funding Amgen Europe GmbH

Stage 1 hypertension defined by the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline predicts future cardiovascular events in elderly Chinese individuals.

The 2017 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) hypertension guideline updated stage 1 hypertension defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 130‐139 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of 80‐89 mm Hg. However, the impact of 1 hypertension that affects future cardiovascular risk remains unclear among older adults in rural China. The prospective cohort study included 7503 adults aged ≥60 years with complete data and no cardiovascular disease (CVD) at baseline. Follow‐up for the new adverse events was conducted from the end of the baseline survey to the end of the third follow‐up survey (2007.01‐2017.12). Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for blood pressure (BP) classifications and adverse events with normal BP as reference (< 120/80 mm Hg). During the 57 290 person‐years follow‐up period, 2261 all‐cause mortality, 1271 CVD mortality, 1159 stroke, and 347 myocardial infarctions (MI) occurred. Patients with stage 1 hypertension versus normal BP had HRs (95% CI) of 1.068 (0.904‐1.261) for all‐cause mortality, 1.304 (1.015‐1.675) for CVD mortality, 1.449 (1.107‐1.899) for stroke, and 1.735 (1.051‐2.863) for MI, respectively. In conclusion, among adults aged ≥60 years, stage 1 hypertension revealed an increased hazard of CVD mortality, stroke, and MI, which is complementary evidence for the application of 2017 ACC/AHA hypertension guidelines in an older Chinese population. Therefore, BP control in patients with stage 1 hypertension may be beneficial to reduce the hazard of CVD in elderly Chinese individuals.

The Evolving View of Coronary Artery Calcium: A Personalized Shared Decision-Making Tool in Primary Prevention.

The 2018 American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) cholesterol management guideline considers current evidence on coronary artery calcium (CAC) testing while incorporating learnings from previous guidelines. More than any previous guideline update, this set encourages CAC testing to facilitate shared decision making and to individualize treatment plans. An important novelty is further separation of risk groups. Specifically, the current prevention guideline recommends CAC testing for primary atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) prevention among asymptomatic patients in borderline and intermediate risk groups (5–7.5% and 7.5–20% 10-year ASCVD risk). This additional sub-classification reflects the uncertainty of treatment strategies for patients broadly considered to be “intermediate risk,” as treatment recommendations for high and low risk groups are well established. The 2018 guidelines, for the first time, clearly recognize the significance of a CAC score of zero, where intensive statin therapy is likely not beneficial and not routinely recommended in selected patients. Lifestyle modification should be the focus in patients with CAC = 0. In this article, we review the recent AHA/ACC cholesterol management guideline and contextualize the transition of CAC testing to a guideline-endorsed decision aid for borderline-to-intermediate risk patients who seek more definitive risk assessment as part of a clinician-patient discussion. CAC testing can reduce low-value treatment and focus primary prevention therapy on those most likely to benefit.