American Association For Pediatric Ophthalmology And Strabismus Research Articles

The Performance of Chatbots and the AAPOS Website as a Tool for Amblyopia Education.

To evaluate the understandability, actionability, and readability of responses provided by the website of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS), ChatGPT-3.5, Bard, and Bing Chat about amblyopia and the appropriateness of the responses generated by the chatbots. Twenty-five questions provided by the AAPOS website were directed three times to fresh ChatGPT-3.5, Bard, and Bing Chat interfaces. Two experienced pediatric ophthalmologists categorized the responses of the chatbots in terms of their appropriateness. Flesch Reading Ease (FRE), Flesch Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), and Coleman-Liau Index (CLI) were used to evaluate the readability of the responses of the AAPOS website and chatbots. Furthermore, the understandability scores were evaluated using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT). The appropriateness of the chatbots' responses was 84.0% for ChatGPT-3.5 and Bard and 80% for Bing Chat (P > .05). For understandability (mean PEMAT-U score AAPOS website: 81.5%, Bard: 77.6%, ChatGPT-3.5: 76.1%, and Bing Chat: 71.5%, P < .05) and actionability (mean PEMAT-A score AAPOS website: 74.6%, Bard: 69.2%, ChatGPT-3.5: 67.8%, and Bing Chat: 64.8%, P < .05), the AAPOs website scored better than the chat-bots. Three readability analyses showed that Bard had the highest mean score, followed by the AAPOS website, Bing Chat, and ChatGPT-3.5, and these scores were more challenging than the recommended level. Chatbots have the potential to provide detailed and appropriate responses at acceptable levels. The AAPOS website has the advantage of providing information that is more understandable and actionable. The AAPOS website and chatbots, especially Chat-GPT, provided difficult-to-read data for patient education regarding amblyopia. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 20XX;X(X):XXX-XXX.].

ChatGPT and Google Assistant as a Source of Patient Education for Patients With Amblyopia: Content Analysis.

We queried ChatGPT (OpenAI) and Google Assistant about amblyopia and compared their answers with the keywords found on the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) website, specifically the section on amblyopia. Out of the 26 keywords chosen from the website, ChatGPT included 11 (42%) in its responses, while Google included 8 (31%). Our study investigated the adherence of ChatGPT-3.5 and Google Assistant to the guidelines of the AAPOS for patient education on amblyopia. ChatGPT-3.5 was used. The four questions taken from the AAPOS website, specifically its glossary section for amblyopia, are as follows: (1) What is amblyopia? (2) What causes amblyopia? (3) How is amblyopia treated? (4) What happens if amblyopia is untreated? Approved and selected by ophthalmologists (GW and DL), the keywords from AAPOS were words or phrases that deemed significant for the education of patients with amblyopia. The "Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level" formula, approved by the US Department of Education, was used to evaluate the reading comprehension level for the responses from ChatGPT, Google Assistant, and AAPOS. In their responses, ChatGPT did not mention the term "ophthalmologist," whereas Google Assistant and AAPOS both mentioned the term once and twice, respectively. ChatGPT did, however, use the term "eye doctors" once. According to the Flesch-Kincaid test, the average reading level of AAPOS was 11.4 (SD 2.1; the lowest level) while that of Google was 13.1 (SD 4.8; the highest required reading level), also showing the greatest variation in grade level in its responses. ChatGPT's answers, on average, scored 12.4 (SD 1.1) grade level. They were all similar in terms of difficulty level in reading. For the keywords, out of the 4 responses, ChatGPT used 42% (11/26) of the keywords, whereas Google Assistant used 31% (8/26). ChatGPT trains on texts and phrases and generates new sentences, while Google Assistant automatically copies website links. As ophthalmologists, we should consider including "see an ophthalmologist" on our websites and journals. While ChatGPT is here to stay, we, as physicians, need to monitor its answers.

Improving follow-up rates by optimizing patient educational materials in retinopathy of prematurity

To examine the impact of newly designed retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) patient educational materials adherent to health literacy guidelines on improving parent understanding of ROP, perceived importance of follow-up care, and subsequent outpatient follow-up attendance rates. This was a repeated-measures study of parents of premature infants at risk for developing ROP. ROP educational materials were redesigned to adhere to current NIH and AMA reading level guidelines. Participants completed surveys that assessed understanding of ROP and perceived importance of clinic follow-up before and after receiving either materials currently available on the website of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS), or the newly designed materials. Results were analyzed to evaluate for an improvement in parent knowledge of ROP and follow-up compliance. Parent ROP knowledge scores improved significantly after receiving educational materials for both the AAPOS materials (55.9% vs 83.7% [P < 0.001]) and the new materials (60.9% vs 91.8% [P < 0.001]). Average post-survey ROP knowledge scores were significantly higher among participants that received the new materials compared to the AAPOS materials (91.8% vs 83.7%, [P < 0.001]). Follow-up attendance rates improved in both groups, with a significantly improved rate from pre-study baseline among the new materials group (80.0% vs 68.2%, [P = 0.008). Implementation of educational materials significantly improved parent understanding of ROP; combined with knowledge assessment, it also improved follow-up compliance. Materials designed to adhere to health literacy guidelines are the most effective resources for improving knowledge of ROP and follow-up attendance.

Unanswered Questions Pertaining to the Economic and Workforce Issues in Pediatric Ophthalmology

To create a survey that examines remaining unanswered questions related to the economic and workforce issues in pediatric ophthalmology. A 12-question survey was distributed to U.S.-based pediatric ophthalmologists on the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) discussion board and various other social media forums. Statistical analysis was performed on the basis of practice setting groups. Two hundred eighty-seven pediatric ophthalmologists completed the survey. Of all respondents, 150 (52.3%) believed pediatric ophthalmology is a prestigious subspecialty, 137 (47.7%) thought that a hybrid fellowship combining pediatric ophthalmology and adult cataract surgery would increase the number of practicing pediatric ophthalmologists, 189 (65.9%) felt that early exposure during medical school would increase the number of residents who ultimately apply to pediatric ophthalmology fellowship, and 81 (28.2%) believed that the lobbyists hired by the AAPOS will be successful in preventing further Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services reimbursement cuts. Medicaid patients comprised more than 25% of the total practice for 156 (54.4%) respondents. New patient, follow-up, and surgery wait times were greater than 2 months in 50.9%, 46.7%, and 38.7% of respondents, respectively. As the economic crisis in pediatric ophthalmology continues to worsen, questions related to increasing interest in the field through early exposure, hybrid fellowship, prestige, appointment wait times, and belief in the success of AAPOS lobbyists remain. Exceptional measures are required to revitalize the field and improve access to care. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2023;60(3):163-169.].

Pediatric Ophthalmology Scope of Practice

ABSTRACT Purpose To determine practice patterns of pediatric ophthalmologists with respect to types of medical conditions cared for and age of patients treated due to limited data regarding pediatric ophthalmologists’ scope of practice. Methods A survey was sent to 1408 international and United States members of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) membership through the group’s internet listserv. Responses were collated and analyzed. Results Ninety members (6.4%) responded. 89% of respondents confine their practices to pediatric ophthalmology and adult strabismus. The percentages of respondents who provide primary surgical and medical treatment of the following conditions include 68% for ptosis and anterior orbital lesions, 49% for cataracts, 38% for uveitis, 25% for retinopathy of prematurity, 19% for glaucoma, and 7% for retinoblastoma. For conditions other than strabismus, 59% restrict their practice to patients less than 21 years of age. Conclusion Pediatric ophthalmologists provide primary medical and surgical care for children with a wide variety of ocular conditions, including complex disorders. Awareness of this variety of practice might prove beneficial in encouraging residents to consider careers in pediatric ophthalmology. Consequently, fellowship education in pediatric ophthalmology should include exposure to these areas.

AAPOS Adult Strabismus Committee's Report on the Status of Adult Strabismus Telemedicine.

To evaluate the utility of telemedicine in the treatment of adult patients with strabismus. A 27-question online survey was sent to ophthalmologists of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) Adult Strabismus Committee. The questionnaire focused on the frequency of telemedicine utilization, the benefits in the diagnosis, follow-up, and treatment of adult strabismus, and barriers of current forms of remote patient visits. The survey was completed by 16 of 19 members of the committee. Most respondents (93.8%) reported 0 to 2 years of experience with telemedicine. Telemedicine was found to be useful for initial screening and follow-up of established patients with adult strabismus, mainly to reduce wait time for a subspecialist visit (46.7%). A successful telemedicine visit could be completed with a basic laptop (73.3%) or a camera (26.7%) or could be assisted by an orthoptist. Most participants agreed that common forms of adult strabismus (cranial nerve palsies, sagging eye syndrome, myogenic strabismus, and thyroid ophthalmopathy) could be examined via webcam. It was easier to analyze horizontal than vertical strabismus. Among the paralytic forms, sixth nerve palsy was the easiest one to assess. Latent forms of strabismus can be partially diagnosed and evaluated using telemedicine, but half of the respondents underlined the importance of in-person examinations in these cases. Sixty-nine percent believed that telemedicine could be a low-cost and time-efficient health service solution. Most members of the AAPOS Adult Strabismus Committee consider telemedicine to be a useful supplement to the current adult strabismus practice. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2023;60(6):386-389.].

The UCI EyeMobile Preschool Vision Screening Program: Refractive Error and Amblyopia Results from the 2019-2020 School Year.

To introduce the University of California Irvine (UCI) EyeMobile for Children preschool vision screening program and describe the ophthalmic examination results of children who failed screening with the PlusoptiX S12C photoscreener during one school year. Children aged 30-72 months were screened with the PlusoptiX using ROC mode 3 during the 2019-2020 school year. Children who failed screening were referred for comprehensive eye examination on the EyeMobile mobile clinic. Presence of amblyopia risk factors (ARFs), amblyopia, and refractive error was determined via retrospective review of records. Amblyopia was defined as unilateral if there was ≥ 2-line interocular difference in the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and as bilateral if BCVA was < 20/50 for children < 4 years old and < 20/40 for children ≥ 4 years old. ARFs were defined using 2021 American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) instrument-based screening guidelines. 5226 children were screened during the study period. Of the 546 children who failed screening, 350 (64%) obtained consent and were examined. Mean age of examined children was 4.45 years. Amblyopia was found in 8% of examined children, with unilateral amblyopia seen in 79% of amblyopic subjects. Glasses were prescribed to 246 (70.3%) children. Of the 240 children who received cycloplegic examinations, 43% had hyperopia and 30% had myopia. The positive predictive value (PPV) of the PlusoptiX screening for ARFs in children who received cycloplegic examinations was 70.4%. A significant proportion of Orange County preschoolers with refractive errors and amblyopia have unmet refractive correction needs. The PlusoptiX S12C photoscreener is an adequate screening device for the UCI EyeMobile for Children program, although modification of device referral criteria may lead to increased PPV. Further research is necessary to understand and overcome the barriers to childhood vision care in our community.

The Economic Downturn of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Its Impact on Access to Eye Care.

To discuss the economic downturn of pediatric ophthalmology in the setting of an alarming decline in the number of residents pursuing pediatric ophthalmology and its impact on limiting access to eye care. Survey studies and articles examining the recent economic impact of reimbursement cuts and practice pattern changes in pediatric ophthalmology were reviewed. Population data from the 2020 U.S. Census Bureau and the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) were analyzed to illustrate provider-to-population relationships by state. Survey studies demonstrated a deteriorating economic situation marked by progression in reimbursement cuts, reductions in pediatric ophthalmologists accepting Medicaid patients, and dwindling numbers of residents pursuing pediatric ophthalmology fellowships. Provider-to-population relationships revealed that pediatric ophthalmologists are not evenly distributed to meet population demand, and that many states are suffering from a shortage of pediatric ophthalmologists. Furthermore, many states with high percentages of Medicaid coverage simultaneously have lower AAPOS members/million person ratios. The simple economic principles of supply and demand reveal a crisis in access to pediatric eye and adult strabismus care. The economic downtown and change in practice patterns may produce rippling effects outside pediatric ophthalmology in fields such as pediatrics and comprehensive ophthalmology. An interdisciplinary effort among health care providers and governmental officials is needed to revive the field of pediatric ophthalmology and improve access to eye care. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2023;60(1):18-24.].

Non-Cycloplegic and Cycloplegic Autorefraction with Retinomax: An Agreement Study in Preschoolers in Los Angeles, California

ABSTRACT Purpose To evaluate the agreement between non-cycloplegic autorefraction (NCAR) and cycloplegic autorefraction (CAR) in an ethnically diverse population of preschool-aged children and the validity of the screening criteria used to refer for further evaluation. Methods This study included data from 7,073 preschoolers who underwent NCAR and CAR, which enabled refractive error classification based on the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) 2013 criteria. Right eye data of sphere and cylinder were used to compare NCAR to CAR via paired t-testing and vector analyses, and left eye data for an analysis on anisometropia. The sensitivity and specificity of screening referral criteria for refractive error were calculated. Results Mean values of sphere differed between NCAR and CAR by 1.95 ± 1.45 D (p < .05) with 95% limits of agreement (LoA) of −0.94 to 4.85 D, with less discrepancy found in myopic eyes. The mean values of cylinder differed by −0.08 ± 0.43 D (p < .05) with 95% LoA of −0.93 to 0.77 D. Power vector results reflected a similar lack of agreement. The sensitivity and specificity of our screening referral criteria were, respectively, 66% and 84% for myopia, 66% and 98% for hyperopia, and 98% and 58% for astigmatism. Conclusion NCAR is insufficient in preschoolers for spherical refractive error referrals. Level of agreements was lower for spherical (15.5% within 0.5D) and higher for cylindrical refractive errors (89.6%) compared to CAR. In the absence of cycloplegic examination, screening programs using NCAR should utilize low referral thresholds for spherical refractive error.

Economic Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic Post-Mitigation on Pediatric Ophthalmologists.

To create a survey to assess the economic impact that the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic post-mitigation (post-shutdown) has had on pediatric ophthalmologists. A 14-question survey was disseminated to United States-based pediatric ophthalmologists on the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) discussion board and on social media. Demographic data and data on the economic effect of the COVID-19 pandemic post-mitigation were collected. A total of 129 pediatric ophthalmologists completed the survey. Eighty-four (65.1%) respondents reported a clinical revenue decrease of greater than 10%, 83 (64.3%) a surgical decrease of greater than 10%, and 66 (51.2%) an income decrease of greater than 10%. Fifteen (11.6%) respondents reported limiting the number of Medicaid patients. This was more prevalent among those in private practice (P = .027). Twenty-seven (20.9%) pediatric ophthalmologists responded that they planned to retire earlier than anticipated because of the pandemic and 2 (1.6%) responded that they have retired since the start of the pandemic. Six (4.7%) respondents reported that they have sold their practice since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Pediatric ophthalmologists continue to face economic challenges introduced by the COVID-19 pandemic. Reduced revenue may represent a new normal for the near future in pediatric ophthalmology. These unprecedented economic upheavals come at a time when the field of pediatric ophthalmology already faces difficulties with low reimbursement and attracting new trainees. This multitude of issues may escalate into a crisis in providing appropriate pediatric ophthalmic care. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2022;59(5):291-295.].

Factors Affecting the Perception of Strabismus Among Pediatric Ophthalmologists.

To define potential factors that influence the perceived urgency of strabismus surgery with a specific focus on the contributions of gender, degree of strabismus, and direction of strabismus. An electronic survey was sent to members of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS). Respondents provided demographic information and ranked eight photographs of adults digitally altered to create varying degrees of strabismus according to perceived urgency for surgery. Pediatric ophthalmologists ranked deviations of increasing size with increasing treatment urgency. Men were perceived with higher urgency for treatment compared to women in the smaller angles of strabismus. No consistent preference for type of deviation was found. The gender of the patient and the amount of misalignment may influence the urgency of surgical management among strabismus surgeons. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2023;60(4):257-262.].

2021 instrument referral criteria for PlusoptiX, SPOT, and 2WIN targeting AAPOS 2021 guidelines

The American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) issued a 2021 update of Guidelines for instrument-based vision screeners. Manufacturers need evidence to update the Instrument Referral Criteria (IRC) in their devices.

Reduced carbon footprint of virtual 2021 annual meeting of AAPOS

Carbon dioxide emissions are the primary driver of climate change, and international medical conferences contribute substantially to greenhouse gas emissions. The reduced carbon footprint of the virtual 2021 Annual Meeting of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) was calculated.

Anisometropia and refractive status in children with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction—a prospective observational study

To assess the refractive status and anisometropia in children with unilateral and bilateral congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO). Consecutive children newly diagnosed with CNLDO were prospectively enrolled from November 2017 to May 2019. A complete ophthalmic evaluation including cycloplegic refraction was performed followed by appropriate intervention. Patients were followed for 6 months, and cycloplegic refraction was performed at each visit. The final refractive error was defined as the refractive error obtained from the most recent visit. Amblyogenic risk factors were assessed based on 2013 referral criteria of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS). A total of 308 patients with CNLDO were enrolled: 205 (67%) unilateral cases and 103 (33%) bilateral cases. In unilateral cases, the affected eye and unaffected fellow eye showed statistically significant difference in terms of sphere (P < 0.001), cylinder (P = 0.019), and spherical equivalent (P < 0.001); there was no interocular difference in bilateral cases (P > 0.05). Anisometropia was more prevalent in unilateral cases than in bilateral cases (11.2% vs 1.9%; P = 0.005). Based on the 2013 AAPOS referral criteria, 3.9% of the unilateral and 3.9% of bilateral cases exhibited amblyogenic risk factors. Later age of presentation was associated with higher rate of anisometropia (53.8% in the age group >48 months). In our study cohort, unilateral CNLDO was associated with a higher prevalence of anisometropia compared with bilateral CNLDO. The affected eye in unilateral CNLDO had higher prevalence of refractive error.

Instrument Referral Criteria for PlusoptiX, SPOT and 2WIN Targeting 2021 AAPOS Guidelines

BackgroundThe American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) issued a 2021 update of Uniform Validation Guidelines for instrument-based pediatric vision screeners. With each update it is important for each manufacturer to update the Instrument Referral Criteria (IRC) programed into their devices in order to optimize sensitivity and specificity to detect AAPOS criteria.MethodsDe-identified data comparing photoscreening with simultaneous confirmatory examinations constituted separate cohorts for the development of IRC via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The refractions of the devices were also compared.ResultsThis study defines three sets of refractive IRC (Sensitive, Medium, and Specific) for three leading infrared photoscreening devices, PlusoptiX A12, Welch-Allyn SPOT, and Adaptica 2WIN for children < 4 and ≥ 4 years in order to better target the 2021 AAPOS guidelines. The cohorts were similar but the SPOT group (n=755, mean age 9) was older with more astigmatism and the 2WIN (n=1362, mean age 7) was younger with more hyperopia and anisometropia compared to the cohort for PlusoptiX A12 (n=616, mean age 8). The age-based, medium magnitude IRC for anisometropia, hyperopia, astigmatism and myopia for SPOT were: <4y: 1.5, 1.75, 3.25, 3.5 and ≥4y: 1.5, 1.75, 2.25, 2.0; for PlusoptiX: <4y: 1.75, 3.0, 3.5, 3.5 and ≥4y: 1.75, 3.0, 2.5, 2.5; and for 2WIN: <4y: 1.75, 2.5, 3.5, 3.5 and ≥4y: 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 2.0. The mean ABCD ellipsoid spectacle matches differed; SPOT: 1.8±1.3 (better) versus PlusoptiX: 1.9±1.6 and 2WIN: 2.2±1.4 (p<0.001).ConclusionThe 2021 AAPOS exam guidelines foster early specificity before age 4 and sensitivity after age 4. These evidence-based IRC for current SPOT, PlusoptiX, and 2WIN photoscreeners should allow device manufacturers the data necessary to adjust their device IRC to maximize specificity, sensitivity or a medium between the two. This paper provides practical suggestions for better validation. Improved early screening combined with thorough treatment should reduce life-long vision impairment due to amblyopia.

AAPOS uniform guidelines for instrument-based pediatric vision screen validation 2021

As instrument-based pediatric vision screening technology has evolved, the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) has developed uniform guidelines (2003, updated 2013) to inform the development of devices that can detect specified target levels of amblyopia risk factors (ARFs) and visually significant refractive error. Clinical experience with the established guidelines has revealed an apparent high level of over-referral for non-amblyopic, symmetric astigmatism, prompting the current revision. The revised guidelines reflect the expert consensus of the AAPOS Vision Screening and Research Committees. For studies of automated screening devices, AAPOS in 2021 recommends that the gold-standard confirmatory comprehensive examination failure levels include anisometropia >1.25 D and hyperopia >4.0 D. Astigmatism >3.0 D in any meridian and myopia <-3 D should be detected in children <48 months, whereas astigmatism >1.75 D and myopia < -2 D should be detected after 48 months. Any media opacity >1 mm and manifest strabismus of >8Δ should also be identified. Along with performance in detecting ARFs and refractive error, validation studies should also report screening instrument performance with regard to presence or absence of amblyopia. Instrument receiver operating characteristic curves and Bland-Altman analysis are suggested to improve comparability of validation studies. Examination failure criteria have been simplified and the threshold for symmetric astigmatism raised compared to the 2013 guidelines, whereas the threshold for amblyogenic anisometropia has been decreased. After age 4 years, lower magnitudes of symmetric astigmatism and myopia are also targeted despite a low risk of amblyopia, because they can influence school performance and may warrant consideration of myopia prevention therapy.

Practice Patterns of Pediatric Ophthalmologists During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

To report the use of protective personal equipment (PPE) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. A 12-question multiple-choice survey was posted on a discussion board used by members of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS). Respondents provided information about their experience, PPE use, office equipment, and approach to care during the COVID-19 pandemic. One hundred twenty-eight pediatric ophthalmologists completed the survey. Eighty-seven (68.0%) identified as in private practice, whereas 41 (32.0%) identified as in an academic setting. Sixty-nine pediatric ophthalmologists (53.9%) reported routinely using N95 respirators, 72 (56.3%) reported wearing medical scrubs, 41 (32.0%) reported using disposable gloves, 33 (25.7%) reported wearing goggles, and 12 (9.4%) reported using face shields during office examinations. One hundred twenty-one pediatric ophthalmologists (94.5%) reported having slit lamps with plastic shields and 52 (40.6%) reported having phoropters with plastic shields. Ninety-nine (77.3%) responded that they would see a patient older than 2 years who refused to wear a mask for a nonemergency visit. Practice patterns of pediatric ophthalmologists have varied during the COVID-19 pandemic. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2022;59(3):145-150.].

Publication Rate of Abstracts Presented at AAPOS Annual Meetings: From Conference Abstract to Full-Text Article.

To review and analyze abstracts presented at American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) annual meetings, and to identify publication rates and potential predictive factors for better outcomes. All abstracts accepted for presentation at AAPOS annual meetings from 2013 to 2017 were examined. A comprehensive literature search via PubMed and Scopus was conducted to identify whether the abstracts had been published as full text. A multivariate analysis was achieved to assess the factors related to successful publication, and a Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to evaluate the publication time course of abstracts. Of 819 analyzed abstracts, 437 (53%) were published in peer-reviewed journals with a median impact factor of 2.7. The overall mean time to publication was 3 ± 2.2 years. The multivariate analysis revealed that abstracts were more likely to be published if they were accepted at an AAPOS annual meeting as an oral paper (P < .001), if they were prospective (P > .001) and multicenter (P = .013) studies, and if they had strabismus, retina, and vitreous disorders and diagnosis as main topics (P = .022). The Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed significant differences in the publication time distribution for multicenter versus single-center abstracts and paper versus poster and e-poster (P < .05). More than half of the abstracts accepted for presentation at the AAPOS annual meetings were published in peer-reviewed journals within 3 years from submission to the meeting. The factors associated with a higher publication rate were the prospective study design, multicentricity, and presentation at the meeting as an oral paper. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 20XX;XX(X):XX-XX.].

Evaluation of pediatric ophthalmologists' perspectives of artificial intelligence in ophthalmology

To survey pediatric ophthalmologists on their perspectives of artificial intelligence (AI) in ophthalmology. This is a subgroup analysis of a study previously reported. In March 2019, members of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) were recruited via the online AAPOS discussion board to voluntarily complete a Web-based survey consisting of 15 items. Survey items assessed the extent participants "agreed" or "disagreed" with statements on the perceived benefits and concerns of AI in ophthalmology. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics. A total of 80 pediatric ophthalmologists who are members of AAPOS completed the survey. The mean number of years since graduating residency was 21years (range, 0-46). Overall, 91% (73/80) reported understanding the concept of AI, 70% (56/80) believed AI will improve the practice of ophthalmology, 68% (54/80) reported willingness to incorporate AI into their clinical practice, 65% (52/80) did not believe AI will replace physicians, and 71% (57/80) believed AI should be incorporated into medical school and residency curricula. However, 15% (12/80) were concerned that AI will replace physicians, 26% (21/80) believed AI will harm the patient-physician relationship, and 46% (37/80) reported concern over the diagnostic accuracy of AI. Most pediatric ophthalmologists in this survey viewed the role of AI in ophthalmology positively.

A Service Coverage Analysis of Primary Congenital Glaucoma Care Across the United States

To assess the number of infants at risk of delayed primary congenital glaucoma (PCG) evaluation due to long travel times to specialists. Cross-sectional geospatial service coverage analysis. All American Glaucoma Society (AGS) and American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) provider locations were geocoded using each organization's member directory. Sixty-minute drive time regions to providers were generated using ArcGIS Pro (Esri). The geographic intersection of AGS and AAPOS service areas was computed because patients typically require visits to both types of specialists. American Community Survey data were then overlaid to estimate the number of infants within and beyond the AGS/AAPOS service areas. One thousand twenty-nine AGS and 1,040 AAPOS provider locations were geocoded. The analysis yielded 944,047 infants age 0-1 year (23.6%) who live beyond the AGS/AAPOS service areas. Therefore, approximately 14-94 new PCG cases/year may be at risk of delayed diagnosis as a result of living in a potential service desert. Compared with children living within the AGS/AAPOS service areas, children aged <6 years in these potential service deserts were more likely to live in households earning below the US federal poverty level, lack health insurance, and live in a single-parent home. These communities are disproportionately likely to experience other rural health disparities and are more prevalent across the Great Plains. Service coverage analysis is a useful tool for identifying underserved regions for PCG referrals and evaluation. These data may assist in targeting screening programs in low access areas for pediatric glaucoma care.