American Academy Of Neurology Criteria Research Articles

Novel strategy: Identifying new markers for demyelination in diabetic distal symmetrical polyneuropathy

ObjectiveTo develop a novel strategy for identifying acquired demyelination in diabetic distal symmetrical polyneuropathy (DSP). BackgroundMotor nerve conduction velocity (CV) slowing in diabetic DSP exceeds expectations for pure axonal loss thus implicating superimposed acquired demyelination. MethodsAfter establishing demyelination confidence intervals by regression analysis of nerve conduction data from chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), we prospectively studied CV slowing in 90 diabetic DSP patients with and without at least one motor nerve exhibiting CV slowing (groups A and B) into the demyelination range by American Academy of Neurology (AAN) criteria respectively and 95 amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients. Simultaneously, secretory phospholipase A2 (sPLA2) activity was assessed in both diabetic groups and 46 healthy controls. ResultsNo ALS patient exhibited CV slowing in more than two motor nerves based on AAN criteria or the confidence intervals. Group A demonstrated a significantly higher percentage of patients as compared to group B fulfilling the above criteria, with an additional criterion of at least one motor nerve exhibiting CV slowing in the demyelinating range and a corresponding F response in the demyelinating range by AAN criteria (70.3 % vs. 1.9 %; p < 0.0001). Urine sPLA2 activity was increased significantly in diabetic groups as compared to healthy controls (942.9 ± 978.0 vs. 591.6 ± 390.2 pmol/min/ml, p < 0.05), and in group A compared to Group B (1328.3 ± 1274.2 vs. 673.8 ± 576.9 pmol/min/ml, p < 0.01). More patients with elevated sPLA2 activity and more than 2 motor nerves with CV slowing in the AAN or the confidence intervals were identified in group A as compared to group B (35.1 % vs. 5.7 %, p < 0.001). Furthermore, 13.5 % of patients in diabetic DSP Group A, and no patients in diabetic DSP Group B, fulfilled an additional criterion of more than one motor nerve with CV slowing into the demyelinating range with its corresponding F response into the demyelinating range by AAN criteria. ConclusionA combination of regression analysis of electrodiagnostic data and a urine biological marker of systemic inflammation identifies a subgroup of diabetic DSP with superimposed acquired demyelination that may respond favorably to immunomodulatory therapy.

Circulating plasma-derived extracellular vesicles expressing bone and kidney markers are associated with neurocognitive impairment in people living with HIV.

Although effective antiretroviral therapy (ART) has improved the life expectancy of people with HIV (PWH), the prevalence of milder forms of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) persist, and it is associated with systemic and neuro-inflammatory processes that could impact other organ systems. However, the complex signaling mechanisms between the bone-kidney systems and the brain in HAND remain unknown. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) play a potential role in inter-organ communication and are involved in regulating cell activity in distant tissues. In this study, we examined whether levels of EVs from bone-and kidney-related cells associate with cognitive dysfunction and explored the relationship between kidney-bone EV axis in PWH experiencing cognitive deficits. EV subtypes were characterized in plasma from 61 PWH with either cognitive impairment (CI, n = 53) or normal cognition (NC, n = 8) based on the American Academy of Neurology criteria for HIV-associated dementia (HAD, n = 11), minor cognitive motor disorder (MCMD, n = 25) or asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment (ANI, n = 17) by spectral flow cytometry. EVs were profiled with markers reflecting bone and kidney cell origin. A support vector machine learning-based model was employed for analyses of EV phenotypes to predict the cognitive dysfunction. Plasma-EVs expressing osteocalcin, sclerostin, and nephrin were significantly higher in the cognitive impairment group compared to the normal cognition group. EVs bearing kidney cell markers correlated significantly with bone-derived EVs. A machine learning-based model, comprised of osteocalcin+, nephrin+, and CD24+ EVs predicted cognitive impairment in PWH on ART. Our study reveals that neurocognitive impairment in PWH is associated with increased levels of plasma EVs enriched with the bone markers osteocalcin and sclerostin and the kidney marker nephrin, suggesting that these EV subtypes may be novel candidate biomarkers for disease-spanning neurocognitive dysfunction. Moreover, the relationship between bone-derived EVs with kidney-derived EVs may suggest their role in mediating inter-organ crosstalk in the pathogenesis of HIV-associated cognitive impairment.

Psychostimulant Medications for Physical Function and Spasticity in Children With Cerebral Palsy: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Cerebral palsy (CP) is a prevalent nonprogressive disorder that leads to impaired movement (ie, spasticity), posture, and balance, which affects functions such as walking and upper extremity tasks. Current medical treatments show efficacy in improving motor performance but have considerable side effects. Emerging off-label use of central nervous system (CNS) medications for improving motor performance has shown promising results in children with CP and other populations. The aim of this study is to describe a protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) to examine the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of methylphenidate (MPH) and modafinil on spasticity and motor performance in children with CP. This will be a protocol study for a pilot, triple-masked, placebo-controlled RCT (a class I trial following the American Academy of Neurology criteria) with blinded patients, outcome assessors, and intervention delivery team. Eligible children should be diagnosed with CP levels I or II based on the Gross Motor Function Classification System and be aged between 7 and 12 years. Thirty-six children with CP will be randomized into 3 groups to receive (1) MPH (2.5 mg of MPH + 100 mg placebo), (2) modafinil (100 mg modafinil + 2.5 mg placebo), or (3) a placebo (2.5 mg placebo + 100 mg placebo), in addition to physical therapy for 12 weeks. Primary outcomes include the Gross Motor Function Measure-66 and the Modified Ashworth Scale. Secondary outcomes include the Timed Up and Go test, 5 Time Sit to Stand test, Modified Clinical Test for Sensory Interaction of Balance, and 10-Meter Walk Test. The protocol has been accepted by Kuwait University (VDR/EC-225) and the Ministry of Health of Kuwait (2022/2157). The inclusion of participants will start in June 2024. The combination of CNS stimulant medications and controlling for rehabilitation has not been studied yet. The findings of this study may determine if using CNS stimulant medications is beneficial for the reduction of spasticity and improvement of physical function in children with spastic CP. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05675098; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05675098. PRR1-10.2196/53728.

Challenges in identification of HIV‐Associated Neurocognitive Disorders, a focus on low and middle income countries

AbstractBackgroundHIV‐associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) are highly prevalent amongst people living with HIV (PLWH), especially in Sub‐Saharan Africa (SSA) where the majority of PLWH live. Current HAND identification measures lack accuracy in older PLWH on treatment, with substantial heterogeneity observed in SSA prevalence meta‐analyses There is a need to better understand the current cognitive phenotype of this newly emergent population, to develop appropriate screening tools. We report two linked studies.Study 1 compared diagnostic accuracy of the International HIV dementia scale (IHDS), and Identification and Interventions for Dementia in Elderly Africans (IDEA) screen, for identification of HAND in older PLWH in TanzaniaStudy 2 aimed to identify cognitive domains significantly associated with symptomatic HAND (s‐HAND) in older PLWH in Tanzania, with potential utility in future screening measures.MethodA systematic sample of 253 PLWH aged ≥ 50 attending a Government clinic underwent comprehensive HAND evaluation by consensus American Academy of Neurology (AAN) criteria including locally‐normed low‐literacy clinical neuropsychological assessment. A diagnostic accuracy study of the IHDS and IDEA screen versus AAN criteria was completed with strict blinding. Participants were offered identical annual reassessment at Y1 Y2 and Y3 and the relationship of cognitive domains with s‐HAND in a logistic mixed effects modelResultHAND was highly prevalent (47%) at baseline, increasing to 57.9% at year 3.At baseline, both IHDS and IDEA had limited diagnostic accuracy for HAND (AUROC 0.639–0.667 IHDS, 0.647–0.713 IDEA). On secondary analysis of longitudinal data, tests of verbal learning and memory, categorical verbal fluency, visual memory and visuoconstruction had AUROC &gt; 0.7 for s‐HAND (0.70 ‐ 0.72; p&lt;0.001 for all). Tests of visual memory, verbal learning and memory (delayed recall and recognition memory), psychomotor speed, language comprehension and categorical verbal fluency were independently associated with s‐HAND (p&lt;0.01 for all). Neuropsychological impairment pattern varied by education.ConclusionCurrent HAND screening tests no longer perform well in the new population of older PLWH in Africa. Tests most associated with s‐HAND include broad cortical and subcortical domains, some not included in existing HAND screening tests and vary by educational background. This should be considered in future HAND screening measure development.

Electrodiagnostic profile of conduction slowing in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

ObjectiveSince motor nerve conduction slowing can occur due to loss of large axons, we investigate the conduction slowing profile in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and identify the limits beyond which the diagnosis of exclusive axonal loss is unlikely. MethodsFirst, using linear regression analysis, we established the range of motor conduction slowing in 76 chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) patients. Demyelinating range confidence intervals were defined by assessing conduction velocity (CV), distal latency (DML), and F-wave latency (F) in relation to distal compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude of median, ulnar, fibular, and tibial nerves. Results were subsequently validated in 38 additional CIDP patients. Then, the newly established demyelination confidence intervals were used to investigate the profile of conduction slowing in 95 ALS patients. ResultsCV slowing, prolonged DML, and abnormal F were observed in 22.2%, 19.6%, and 47.1% of the studied nerves respectively in ALS patients. When slowing occurred, it affected more than one segment of the motor nerve, suggesting that CMAP amplitude dependent conduction slowing caused by an exclusive loss of large axons is the main mechanism of slowing. No ALS patient had more than 2 nerves with CV slowing in the confidence interval defined by the regression equations or the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) research criteria for CIDP diagnosis. ConclusionsThe presence of more than two motor nerves with CV slowing in the demyelinating range defined by the regression analysis or AAN criteria in ALS patients suggests the contribution of acquired demyelination or other additional mechanisms exist in the electrodiagnostic profile of ALS.

Motor Nerve Conduction Slowing in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (P10-8.006)

<h3>Objective:</h3> To determine the range of conduction values for motor nerve conduction slowing and further characterize the distribution of conduction slowing in ALS and characterize the limits of conduction slowing beyond which the diagnosis of ALS is uncertain. <h3>Background:</h3> Abnormal motor nerve conduction studies in ALS are attributed to loss of large axons and distal axonopathy, however conduction slowing can be the result of superimposed demyelinating polyneuropathy or an alternate diagnosis. <h3>Design/Methods:</h3> The electrodiagnostic data of 76 chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) patients, identified using AAN research criteria was used to create 12 novel equations using regression analysis that determine a range of the expected slowing of a primary demyelinating polyneuropathy. Demyelinating range confidence intervals were defined by assessing conduction velocity (CV), distal latency (DL), and F latency in relation to distal compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude of median, ulnar, fibular, and tibial nerves. Results were then validated in 38 additional CIDP patients. These developed equations were then used to evaluate conduction slowing in 95 patients with ALS. Transformed CMAP amplitude was used as an independent variable whereas transformed DL, CV, and F were used as dependent variables. <h3>Results:</h3> CV slowing, prolonged DL, and abnormal F latency were observed respectively in 22.2%, 19.6%, and 46.7% of the studied nerves. When slowing occurred, it affected more than one segment of the motor nerve, suggesting that loss of large axons is the main mechanism of slowing. No ALS patient had more than 2 nerves with CV slowing in the confidence interval defined by the regression equations or the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) research criteria for CIDP diagnosis. <h3>Conclusions:</h3> The presence of more than two motor nerves with CV slowing in the demyelinating range defined by the regression analysis or AAN criteria in ALS patients suggests an alternative diagnosis or superimposed demyelination. <b>Disclosure:</b> Mr. Mandava has nothing to disclose. Miss Shaikh has nothing to disclose. Mr. Jaffry has nothing to disclose. Mr. Jaffry has nothing to disclose. Mr. Ors has nothing to disclose. Mr. Trivedi has nothing to disclose. Ms. Faiz has nothing to disclose. Mr. Gandhi has nothing to disclose. Dr. Patel has nothing to disclose. Abu Nasar, MD has nothing to disclose. Ankit Pahwa has nothing to disclose. Dr. Sander has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Grifols. Dr. Sander has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as a Consultant for Grifols. Dr. Sander has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as an Expert Witness for Law firm. Dr. Souayah has received publishing royalties from a publication relating to health care.

HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorders: The First Longitudinal Follow-Up of a cART-Treated Cohort of Older People in Sub-Saharan Africa.

HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) are a highly prevalent chronic complication in older people living with HIV (PLWH) in high-income countries. Although sub-Saharan Africa has a newly emergent population of older combination antiretroviral therapy (cART)-treated PLWH, HAND have not been studied longitudinally. We assessed longitudinal prevalence of HAND and have identified possible modifiable factors in a population of PLWH aged 50 years or older, over 3 years of follow-up. Detailed neuropsychological and clinical assessment was completed annually in the period 2016-2019 in a systematic sample of cART-treated PLWH in Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. A consensus panel defined HAND using American Academy of Neurology criteria for asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment, mild neurocognitive disorder, and HIV-associated dementia. HIV disease severity and other factors associated with HAND progression, improvement, and stability were evaluated in individuals fully assessed at baseline and in 2019. At baseline, 47% of the cohort (n = 253, 72.3% female individuals) met HAND criteria despite good HIV disease control [Y1 59.5% (n = 185), Y2 61.7% (n = 162), and Y3 57.9% (n = 121)]. Of participants fully assessed at baseline and year 3 (n = 121), HAND remained stable in 54% (n = 57), improved in 15% (n = 16), and declined in 31% (n = 33). Older age and lower education level significantly predicted HAND progression, whereas HIV-specific factors did not. Male sex and shorter cART duration were associated with improvement. In this first longitudinal study characterizing clinical course of HAND in older cART-treated PLWH in sub-Saharan Africa, HAND was highly prevalent with variable progression and reversibility. Progression may be more related to cognitive reserve than HIV disease in cART-treated PLWH.

Evaluation of a low-resource screening strategy for ophthalmic pathologies and associated neurological morbidity in an older Tanzanian HIV-positive population

Globally, 43 million people are living with HIV, 90% in developing countries. Increasing life expectancy with combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) results in chronic complications, including HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) and eye diseases. HAND screening is currently challenging. Our aim was to evaluate clinical utility of retinopathy as a screening measure of HAND in older cART-treated individuals in Tanzania and feasibility of smartphone-based retinal screening in this low-resource setting. A cross-sectional systematic sample aged ≥ 50-years attending routine HIV follow-up in Tanzania were comprehensively assessed for HAND by American Academy of Neurology criteria and received ophthalmic assessment including smartphone-based retinal imaging. HAND and ophthalmic assessments were independent and blinded. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by AUROC curves. Of 129 individuals assessed, 69.8% were visually impaired. Thirteen had retinopathy. HAND prevalence was 66.7%. Retinopathy was significantly associated with HAND but HIV-disease factors (CD4, viral load) were not. Diagnostic accuracy of retinopathy for HAND was poor (AUROC 0.545-0.617) but specificity and positive predictive value were high. We conclude that ocular pathology and HAND appear highly prevalent in this low-resource setting. Although retinal screening cannot be used alone identify HAND, prioritization of individuals with abnormal retinal screening is a potential strategy in low-resource settings.

Evidence-based guideline: Neuromuscular ultrasound for the diagnosis of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.

The purpose of this literature review is to develop an evidence-based guideline for the use of neuromuscular ultrasound in the diagnosis of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE). The proposed research question was: "In patients with suspected UNE, does ulnar nerve enlargement as measured with ultrasound accurately identify those patients with UNE?" A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed, and studies were classified according to American Academy of Neurology criteria for rating articles for diagnostic accuracy. Based on Class I evidence in four studies, it is probable that neuromuscular ultrasound measurement of the ulnar nerve at the elbow, either of diameter or cross-sectional area (CSA), is accurate for the diagnosis of UNE. For patients with symptoms and signs suggestive of ulnar neuropathy, clinicians should offer ultrasonographic measurement of ulnar nerve cross-sectional area or diameter to confirm the diagnosis and localize the site of compression (Level B).

HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorders (HAND): The First Longitudinal Follow Up of a cART-Treated Cohort of Older People in Sub-Saharan Africa

Background: HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) are a highly prevalent chronic complication in older people living with HIV (PLWH) in high-income countries (HICs). Although Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) has a newly emergent population of older cART treated PLWH, HAND have not been studied longitudinally. We assessed longitudinal prevalence of HAND and have identified possible modifiable risk factors in a population of PLWH aged ≥50, over three years of follow-up. Methods: Detailed neuropsychological and clinical assessment was completed annually 2016-2019 in a baseline systematic sample of cART treated PLWH in Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. A consensus panel defined HAND using American Academy of Neurology criteria for asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment (ANI), mild neurocognitive disorder (MND) and HIV-associated dementia (HAD). HIV-disease severity and other factors associated with HAND progression, improvement and stability were evaluated in individuals fully assessed at baseline and in 2019. Findings: At baseline 47% of the cohort (n=253, 72·3% female) met HAND criteria despite good HIV-disease control [Y1 59.5% (n=185), Y2 61·7% (n=162), Y3 57·9% (n=121)]. Of participants fully assessed at baseline and year 3 (n=121) HAND remained stable in 54% (n=57), improved in 15% (n=16), and declined in 31% (n=33). Older age and lower education level significantly predicted HAND progression, whereas HIV-specific factors did not. Male gender and shorter cART-treatment predicted improvement. Interpretation: In this first longitudinal study characterising clinical course of HAND in older cART treated PLWH in SSA, HAND was highly prevalent with variable progression and reversibility. Progression may be more related to cognitive reserve than HIV-disease in cART-treated PLWH. Funding Information: This study was part-funded by the Academy of Medical Sciences, Grand Challenges Canada and the Newcastle University Master’s in Research Programme. Declaration of Interests: None. Ethics Approval Statement: Ethical approval was granted by Kilimanjaro Christian Medical College Research Ethics and Review Committee (N·896) and the Tanzanian National Institute for Medical Research (NIMR/HQ/R·8a/Vol·IX/2136). Participants were provided with written and verbal study information as appropriate by trained nurses. Where participants lacked capacity to consent due to cognitive impairment, assent was sought from a close relative. Consent was reviewed annually, and additional informed consent was requested to obtain an informant history for corroboration of cognitive and functional decline.

Rehabilitation Intensity and Patient Outcomes in Skilled Nursing Facilities in the United States: A Systematic Review.

Exponential increases in rehabilitation intensity in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) motivated recent changes in Medicare reimbursement policies, which remove financial incentives for providing more minutes of physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech therapy. Yet, there is concern that SNFs will reduce therapy provision and patients will experience worse outcomes. The purpose of this systematic review was to synthesize current evidence on the relationship between therapy intensity and patient outcomes in SNFs. PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL, PEDro, and COCHRANE databases were searched. English-language studies published in the United States between 1998 and February 14, 2020, examining the relationship between therapy intensity and community discharge, hospital readmission, length of stay (LOS), and functional improvement for short-stay SNF patients were considered. Data extraction and risk of bias were performed using the American Academy of Neurology Classification of Evidence scale for causation questions. American Academy of Neurology criteria were used to assess confidence in the evidence for each outcome. Eight observational studies met inclusion criteria. There was moderate evidence that higher intensity therapy was associated with higher rates of community discharge and shorter LOS. One study provided very low-level evidence of associations between higher intensity therapy and lower hospital readmissions after total hip and knee replacement. There was low-level evidence indicating higher intensity therapy is associated with improvements in function. This systematic review concludes with moderate confidence that higher intensity therapy in SNFs leads to higher community discharge rates and shorter LOS. Future research should improve quality of evidence on functional improvement and hospital readmissions. This systematic review demonstrates that patients in SNFs may benefit from higher intensity therapy. Because new policies no longer incentivize intensive therapy, patient outcomes should be closely monitored to ensure patients in SNFs receive high-quality care.

IncobotulinumtoxinA for the Treatment of Blepharospasm in Toxin-Naïve Subjects: A Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

This study aimed to assess the efficacy/safety of incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin®, Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH) in botulinum neurotoxin-naïve subjects with blepharospasm. Botulinum neurotoxin-naïve subjects (≥ 12months without botulinum neurotoxin treatment for blepharospasm) received single-dose incobotulinumtoxinA 50 U, 25U, or placebo. Subjects were followed for 6-20weeks (main period). Qualified subjects entered an open-label extension period and received another incobotulinumtoxinA injection (≤ 70 U). The primary efficacy variable was change from baseline in the Jankovic Rating Scale (JRS) severity subscore at the main period of week 6. Other efficacy variables included changes in the Blepharospasm Disability Index score and JRS frequency subscore and sumscore. Adverse events were monitored. Sixty-one subjects were randomized (main period: incobotulinumtoxinA 50 U, n = 19; incobotulinumtoxinA 25 U, n = 22; placebo, n = 20); 39 entered the open-label extension period (9, 14, and 16 subjects from the incobotulinumtoxinA 50 U, incobotulinumtoxinA 25 U, and placebo groups [main period], respectively, changed to open-label extension period dosing). A statistically significantly greater reduction in JRS severity subscore was reported for subjects receiving incobotulinumtoxinA 50 U versus placebo (ANCOVA, least square mean difference: -1.2, p = 0.0004). Subjects receiving incobotulinumtoxinA experienced improvements in other efficacy variables versus baseline and/or placebo. Sustained clinical improvements and low adverse event rates (22.2-42.1%) were observed. This is the second placebo-controlled, double-blind study that demonstrates favorable efficacy/safety of incobotulinumtoxinA in subjects with blepharospasm. IncobotulinumtoxinA is the first botulinum neurotoxin that could fulfill the American Academy of Neurology criteria for a Level A recommendation for blepharospasm.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01896895.

Cognitive Efficacy of Pharmacologic Treatments in Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review

IntroductionCognitive impairment is prevalent and debilitating among persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). While many pharmacologic treatments have shown good efficacy in reducing clinical relapses, brain lesions, and improving certain physical symptoms, their efficacy for improving cognitive function is not well understood.ObjectivesThe current systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of pharmacologic treatments for improving cognitive function among persons with MS.MethodsA literature search was conducted through the PubMed and PsycINFO databases. Two independent reviewers assessed each paper, and a third reviewer weighed in if the two reviewers could not reach a consensus. Classification of evidence was determined using the 2017 American Academy of Neurology (AAN) criteria for therapeutic trials. Standardized effect sizes (Cohen’s d) were calculated to compare across studies.ResultsEighty-seven journal articles published between 1990 and January 2020 were included in the current review. Overall, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of pharmacologic treatments to improve cognitive function in persons with MS. There were many contradictory findings observed in this review, which may be due to possible unidentified moderating treatment response variables and/or lack of standardization in assessment procedures. There was also an overreliance on statistical significance (most papers did not provide sizes of treatment effects), which may not be clinically meaningful.ConclusionsHigher-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to establish the cognitive efficacy of pharmacologic treatments for MS-related cognitive dysfunction, with cognition as the primary endpoint. Researchers are urged to use standardized criteria (such as the AAN criteria) to guide their research designs. Clinicians should consider effect sizes of studies before deciding whether to prescribe certain medications to ameliorate cognitive symptoms.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s40263-020-00734-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Brain Death and Organ Donation

Brain death is the state of irreversible loss of the clinical functions of the brain. A patient must meet strict criteria to be declared brain dead. They must have suffered a known and demonstrably irreversible brain injury and must not have a condition that could render neurologic testing unreliable. If the patient meets these criteria, a formal brain death examination can be performed. The three findings in brain death are coma or unresponsiveness, absence of brainstem reflexes, and apnea. Brain death is closely tied to organ donation, because brain-dead patients represent approximately 90% of deceased donors and thus a large majority of donated organs. This review details a definition and overview of brain death, determination of brain death, and controversy over brain death, as well as the types of organ donation (living donation versus deceased donation), donation after brain death, and donation after cardiac death. A figure presents a comparison of organ donation after brain death and after cardiac death, and a table lists the American Academy of Neurology Criteria for Determination of Brain Death. This review contains 1 highly rendered figure, 3 table, and 20 references.

Practice guideline update summary: Efficacy and tolerability of the new antiepileptic drugs I: Treatment of new-onset epilepsy: Report of the American Epilepsy Society and the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.

Objective: To update the 2004 American Academy of Neurology (AAN) guideline for treating new-onset focal or generalized epilepsy (GE) with second- and third-generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Methods: The 2004 AAN criteria was used to systematically review literature (January 2003 to November 2015), classify pertinent studies according to the therapeutic rating scheme, and link recommendations to evidence strength. Results: Several second-generation AEDs are effective for new-onset focal epilepsy. Data are lacking on efficacy in new-onset generalized tonic-clonic seizures, juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, or juvenile absence epilepsy, and on efficacy of third-generation AEDs in new-onset epilepsy. Recommendations: Lamotrigine (LTG) should (Level B) and levetiracetam (LEV) and zonisamide (ZNS) may (Level C) be considered in decreasing seizure frequency in adults with new-onset focal epilepsy. LTG should (Level B) and gabapentin (GBP) may (Level C) be considered in decreasing seizure frequency in patients ≥60 years with new-onset focal epilepsy. Unless there are compelling adverse-effect-related concerns, ethosuximide (ETS) or valproic acid (VPA) should be considered before LTG to decrease seizure frequency in treating absence seizures in childhood absence epilepsy (Level B). No high-quality studies suggest clobazam, eslicarbazepine, ezogabine, felbamate, GBP, lacosamide, LEV, LTG, oxcarbazepine, perampanel, pregabalin, rufinamide, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, or ZNS is effective in treating new-onset epilepsy because no high-quality studies exist in adults of various ages. A recent FDA strategy allows extrapolation of efficacy across populations; therefore, for focal epilepsy, eslicarbazepine and lacosamide (oral only for pediatric use) as add-on or monotherapy in persons ≥4 years old and perampanel as monotherapy received FDA approval.

Practice guideline update summary: Efficacy and tolerability of the new antiepileptic drugs I: Treatment of new-onset epilepsy: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society.

To update the 2004 American Academy of Neurology (AAN) guideline for treating new-onset focal or generalized epilepsy with second- and third-generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). The 2004 AAN criteria were used to systematically review literature (January 2003-November 2015), classify pertinent studies according to the therapeutic rating scheme, and link recommendations to evidence strength. Several second-generation AEDs are effective for new-onset focal epilepsy. Data are lacking on efficacy in new-onset generalized tonic-clonic seizures, juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, or juvenile absence epilepsy, and on efficacy of third-generation AEDs in new-onset epilepsy. Lamotrigine (LTG) should (Level B) and levetiracetam (LEV) and zonisamide (ZNS) may (Level C) be considered in decreasing seizure frequency in adults with new-onset focal epilepsy. LTG should (Level B) and gabapentin (GBP) may (Level C) be considered in decreasing seizure frequency in patients ≥60 years of age with new-onset focal epilepsy. Unless there are compelling adverse effect-related concerns, ethosuximide or valproic acid should be considered before LTG to decrease seizure frequency in treating absence seizures in childhood absence epilepsy (level B). No high-quality studies suggest clobazam, eslicarbazepine, ezogabine, felbamate, GBP, lacosamide, LEV, LTG, oxcarbazepine, perampanel, pregabalin, rufinamide, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, or ZNS is effective in treating new-onset epilepsy because no high-quality studies exist in adults of various ages. A recent Food and Drug Administration (FDA) strategy allows extrapolation of efficacy across populations; therefore, for focal epilepsy, eslicarbazepine and lacosamide (oral only for pediatric use) as add-on or monotherapy in persons ≥4 years old and perampanel as monotherapy received FDA approval.

Exploring Wellness Interventions in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: an Evidence-Based Review.

There has been recent interest in the role of lifestyle and wellness-based approaches in the treatment and management of multiple sclerosis (MS). These approaches may be particularly relevant for patients with progressive MS, considering limited therapeutic options currently available. The purpose of this review is to examine the role of wellness-based interventions including exercise training, emotional well-being therapies, and dietary modification in patients with progressive MS. We conducted a literature search on the efficacy of wellness-based interventions in patients with progressive MS published between 1985 and July 2017. The level of evidence for each trial was evaluated using the American Academy of Neurology criteria. Overall, 21 articles reporting on 16 wellness-based interventions were identified: ten trials involved exercise training, three involved emotional wellness therapies, two involved dietary modification, and one was a combined wellness intervention. There is level C evidence (possibly effective; one class II study) for the efficacy of aerobic exercise training on cardiorespiratory fitness in patients with progressive MS. There is level B evidence (probably effective; one class I study) for the efficacy of mindfulness training on psychological distress, depression, anxiety, pain, and quality of life in patients with progressive MS. There is inadequate evidence (level U) for efficacy of dietary modification (one class III study and one class IV study) and combined wellness interventions involving exercise training, meditation, and dietary modification (one class IV study). High-quality research is needed to provide evidence-based recommendations for wellness behaviors and lifestyle change in patients with progressive MS.

Current controversies in brain death determination.

Although the concept of brain death is accepted by the majority of physicians, lawyers, ethicists and society at large, controversies about determination of death by neurological criteria persist, and often reach the public eye. In this article, we examine four prominent controversial brain death cases from 2013-2016. We review current controversies, including protocol variability, recognition of the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) criteria for brain death as an accepted medical standard, and management of objections to discontinuation of organ support after determination of brain death. Brain death remains conceptually and legally valid, and it is vital that these issues are solved. We argue that medical societies and governmental regulatory bodies must support the AAN criteria in order to decrease protocol variability, and must fully endorse the validity of these criteria as accepted medical standards.

Association of aggressive resection with survival and progression-free survival in adult low-grade glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis with numbers needed to treat.

2025 Background: Low-grade gliomas (LGG) account for 17-22% of all primary brain tumors. Optimal surgical management consists of optimum safe resection with the goal of complete resection. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify the association of extent of resection with likelihood of survival, expressing our results in numbers needed to treat (NNT). Methods: A systematic review and study-level meta-analysis to determine the association of resection with overall survival and progression-free survival in newly diagnosed, supratentorial LGG in adults was performed by querying PubMed. Data were extracted to compare gross total resection (GTR) to subtotal resection (STR) and STR to biopsy (Bx) to determine relative risks (RR) of death and progression at 2, 5, and 10 years. Data were analyzed using a random effects model. NNT were calculated from significant comparisons and rounded up to the nearest whole number. Quality of evidence was determined by American Academy of Neurology criteria. Results: The systematic review resulted in 283 potential studies. Ultimately 29 studies were included in at least one comparison. There were no high quality (class I and II) or prospective studies discovered in the review. Comparing GTR to STR, RR with 95% confidence intervals (CI) of death at 2, 5, and 10 years, and NNT to avoid one death at 2, 5, and 10 years (GTR vs. STR) were 0.29 [0.17-0.52, p &lt; 0.0001, NNT 17], 0.39 [0.29-0.51, p &lt; 0.00001, NNT 6], and 0.50 [0.35-0.70, p &lt; 0.0001 NNT 4]. RR and NNT for progression (GTR vs. STR) at 2, 5, and 10 years were 0.37 [0.24-0.57, p &lt; 0.0001 NNT 7], 0.50 [0.39-0.64, p &lt; 0.0001 NNT 4], and 0.67 [0.53-0.84, p = 0.0005 NNT 4]. Comparing STR to Bx, RR of death at 2, 5, and 10 years were 0.55 [0.34-0.88, p = 0.01 NNT 10], 0.9 [0.61-1.34], and 0.95 [0.73-1.23]. Conclusions: Increasing resection thresholds appear to be associated with improved overall and progression free survival, but the body of literature consists of low quality studies. Prospective studies are required to explore whether extent of resection matters or whether resectable tumors share a favorable biology associated with better outcome.

Quantifying the benefit of chemotherapy and radiation in low-grade glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of numbers needed to treat.

2057 Background: The optimal role of chemotherapy and radiation (RT) in adult low-grade glioma (LGG, WHO grade 1 &amp; 2) is unclear. We conducted a systematic review and study-level meta-analysis of the literature on overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) in patients with LGG. Methods: Pubmed was queried with MeSH terms. All comparative studies of adults with newly diagnosed, supratentorial LGG were included. Comparisons of interest were OS and PFS at 2, 5, and 10 years in chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy and early RT versus delayed or no RT. Data were extracted from studies and synthesized with a random effects model. Quality of evidence was determined by American Academy of Neurology criteria and further analysis was performed, separating high quality (class I and II) from low quality (class III and IV) evidence. Numbers needed to treat (NNT) were determined from the risk difference. Results: 1531 articles were screened; 18 studies were included. Chemotherapy was not associated with a significant survival advantage compared to control. However, an analysis of high quality data revealed a survival advantage at 10 years associated with chemotherapy compared to control with NNT 5 (relative risk death chemo vs control 0.69 [0.56-0.86] p = 0.0006). Furthermore, NNT to prevent one progression with chemotherapy at 5 and 10 years was 6 and 3, respectively. Early RT was not associated with an OS advantage compared to control. However, early RT had progression benefit at all time points, with NNT of 10, 6, and 5 at 2, 5, and 10 years. Conclusions: Further study will be needed to confirm the optimal role of chemotherapy and RT. Caution must be used in interpretation as much of the literature consists of low-quality studies. [Table: see text]