AAFP Research Articles

Provider Guidance for the Prevention of Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Infants: Maternal Vaccination Versus Infant Monoclonal Antibody Treatment.

In 2023, the Food and Drug Administration approved 2 new products to reduce the risk of lower respiratory infections caused by respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in infants: Beyfortus (nirsevimab; AstraZeneca/Sanofi), a single-dose monoclonal antibody for infant administration, and Abrysvo (bivalent RSVpreF vaccine; Pfizer), a single-dose maternal vaccination. We aimed to synthesize data from the literature and the leading professional organizations to provide guidance on RSV and strategies to reduce the risk of infant infection. This information will assist prenatal care clinicians in counseling their patients regarding the choice between maternal vaccination and the infant monoclonal antibody. A descriptive review of the guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG), American Academy of Pediatrics, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and the American Academy of Family Physicians. All 5 organizations recommend that RSV vaccination should be offered to all pregnant people during the RSV season (September-January in the continental United States). Infants younger than 8 months entering into their first RSV season born to those who did not receive maternal vaccination or received vaccination less than 14 days prior to birth should be offered monoclonal antibody administration. RSV vaccination and monoclonal antibodies have the potential to significantly reduce the burden of lower respiratory tract infections due to RSV in infants. Future studies should further evaluate the durability of protection and other strategies to further protect the infant, including cocooning and the role of breast milk in immunity.

Quality Indicators for Pain in Adults: A Review of Performance Measures by the American College of Physicians.

Pain is a debilitating symptom generally caused by injuries or various conditions. It can be acute, subacute, or chronic and can have a significant impact on a patient's quality of life. The goal of managing pain is to relieve or reduce suffering and improve patient functioning. Several performance measures that address the treatment of pain are used in payment, public reporting, or accountability programs. The American College of Physicians (ACP) embraces performance measurement as a means to improve quality of care. ACP believes that a performance measure must be methodologically sound and evidence-based to be considered for inclusion in payment, accountability, or reporting programs. However, a plethora of performance measures that provide minimal or no value to patient care have inundated physicians, practices, and systems with the burden of collecting and reporting data. ACP's Performance Measurement Committee (PMC) reviews performance measures using a validated process to recognize high-quality performance measures, address gaps and areas for improvement in performance measures, and help reduce reporting burden. There is a need for a higher standard for a performance measure when reputation and reimbursement are on the line. This paper aims to present a review of current performance measures for pain to inform physicians, payers, and policymakers in their selection and use of performance measures. The PMC reviewed 6 performance measures for pain relevant to internal medicine physicians, of which 3 were considered valid at their intended levels of attribution ("Use of Imaging for Low Back Pain," "Use of Opioids at High Dosage in Persons Without Cancer," and "Use of Opioids From Multiple Providers in Persons Without Cancer"). This paper also proposes a performance measure concept to address a quality-of-care gap based on the current clinical guideline from ACP and the American Academy of Family Physicians, "Nonpharmacologic and Pharmacologic Management of Acute Pain From Non-low Back, Musculoskeletal Injuries in Adults."

Incorporating Social Needs Screening in Simulation for Family Nurse Practitioner Students.

A pilot simulation was implemented at a private university school of nursing to provide an opportunity for family nurse practitioner (FNP) students to apply their knowledge of assessing and addressing social determinants of health (SDOH). The Social Needs Screening Tool (SNST), developed by the American Academy of Family Physicians, and SDOH content were incorporated into a tele-health simulation-based learning experience. Using Zoom [Zoom Video Communications, Inc.], students encountered a standardized patient who sought care for shoulder pain and shared concerns about transportation and finances. Thirty-nine FNP students individually completed the simulation. Evaluation was conducted via an adapted Simulation Effectiveness Tool-Modified and written feedback to assess confidence and skills. Eighty-nine percent of students reported they felt more comfortable using the SNST following the simulation. Incorporating SDOH content and the SNST within simulation-based learning is an effective learning activity to enhance FNP student confidence and skills in assessing and addressing SDOH. [J Nurs Educ. 2024;63(X):XXX-XXX.].

Answering a Call to Action: Reducing Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders Using a Healthcare Champion Model.

Prenatal alcohol exposure and fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASDs) remain critical public health issues. Alcohol use in pregnancy is a leading preventable cause of birth defects, developmental disabilities, and learning disabilities. Alcohol screening and brief intervention (SBI) is effective at reducing excessive alcohol use. However, this clinical preventive service remains critically underutilized in primary care. In 2014, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention called for the creation of FASD Champion programs to promote clinician education about FASDs. Six professional health organizations and groups providing reproductive and child health services set out to create FASD Champion programs. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists FASDs Prevention Program was created to focus on reducing alcohol-exposed pregnancies. The American Academy of Pediatrics' Champion program maintains the goal of improving health outcomes for children with FASDs by improving pediatricians' diagnostic capacity. The American Academy of Family Physicians has prioritized training family physician champions to improve the delivery of alcohol SBI among adult patients. The University of Alaska Anchorage has partnered with the National Association of Nurse Practitioners in Women's Health, the American College of Nurse-Midwives, and the Association of Women's Health, Obstetric, and Neonatal Nurses to assure advanced practice registered nurses and midwives have the knowledge and skills to prevent alcohol-exposed pregnancies and FASDs. The American Association of Medical Assistants has prioritized expanding the knowledge and skills of medical assistants related to promoting alcohol-free pregnancies. Finally, the Champions program at the University of Texas at Austin was established to train health social workers in alcohol SBI. Through the advocacy, education, and mission of these 6 health sectors in collaboration with national organizations and educational institutions, the evidence-based approach of alcohol SBI is being disseminated throughout the United States to reduce the harmful effects of prenatal alcohol exposure.

Associations Between Social Determinants of Health and Outcomes of Chronic Medical Conditions.

Social determinants of health, such as food insecurity, can significantly impact patient welfare, potentially increasing the prevalence of chronic illnesses while hindering their management, as shown in previous data collected by the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. This study aimed to investigate the association between food insecurity and other social determinants of health with hyperlipidemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and hypertension. To that end, self-reported data on food security from clinical encounters and biological data from medical records were collected. This study utilized electronic medical record data from 349 patients aged between 18 and 85 years who answered two standard food insecurity screening questions. Each patient's current diagnoses and lab values, including blood pressure, fasting low-densitylipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), were then collected. Among patients facing food insecurity (n = 48), 55% were diagnosed with hypertension (p = 0.019), 45% with hyperlipidemia, and 27% with T2DM (p = 0.005). By comparison, these values for food-secure patients were 39%, 54%, and 13%, respectively (n = 301, p > 0.05). Regarding control of these chronic illnesses, hypertension (defined as blood pressure >135/85 mmHg per American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) guidelines) was observed in 12% of food-secure patients (n = 301, p > 0.05) and 42% of food-insecure patients (n = 48, p = 0.0204), whereas differences in control of hyperlipidemia and T2DM were insignificant. These results suggest that food-insecure patients are more likely to be diagnosed with hypertension and T2DM but are less likely than food-secure patients to be diagnosed with hyperlipidemia. Consistent with previous research, this study highlights the potentially increased health risks for patients experiencing food insecurity and calls for further efforts to screen patients for social determinants of health.

Deprescribing in an outpatient medical clinic at a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka

Introduction: Use of multiple concomitant medications or ‘polypharmacy’ is linked to decreased medication adherence, adverse drug reactions and increased financial burden on patients and the economy. Deprescribing by experienced healthcare personnel can ensure safe and effective use of medications. Many medications, prescribed during hospital stay or at clinic level are continued for unnecessarily long periods, highlighting the necessity for deprescribing. The objectives of this audit were to identify and deprescribe inappropriate medications in patients, identify their comorbidities and explore reasons for the inappropriate medication use.Methods: This deprescribing audit was conducted by systematic sampling in selected adult patients >18 years, attending a medical clinic at National Hospital, Kandy over one month. The audit standard was the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) ‘5-step process in deprescribing’. Our study was based only on the first 3 steps of the AAFP deprescribing process.Results: Out of a total of 402 patients, deprescribing was carried out in 135 (33.58%). In this deprescribed group, 59.3% of patients were female and the mean age was 62.3 (±10.9) years. Furthermore, of the deprescribed patients, 52.6% had hypertension, 44.4% had ischaemic heart disease, and 34.1% had diabetes mellitus. The most deprescribed medication was antiplatelets (37.8%), followed by analgesics (24.4%) and diuretics (20%). A clear indication for using the drug was lacking in 68.9%, while 31.1% of patients continued taking the medication for longer than recommended. Conclusions: In this audit, over one third of patients underwent deprescribing. It provides just a glimpse of the broader issue of inappropriate polypharmacy and the necessity of deprescribing. Future research involving multiple centres is recommended to enhance understanding of medication patterns necessitating deprescribing.

Evaluating the Accuracy and Utility of Large Language Models in Answering Common Contraception Questions [ID 2683633

INTRODUCTION: Traditional web resources that provide information on contraception produce varied results demanding user synthesis. However, direct answers provided by large language models (LLMs) can offer accessible contraception counseling. This study examines the efficacy of four LLMs, OpenAI's ChatGPT 4.0, OpenAI's ChatGPT 3.5, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing, in answering common contraception questions. METHODS: Contraception questions and responses in a recent American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) review were used as reference text. We presented GPT-4.0, GPT-3.5, Bard, and Bing with six contraception questions from the AAFP text, ensuring no prior chat bias. Response formatting was standardized for analysis. Two ob-gyn physician reviewers (S.J. and A.A.), blinded to the source LLM, assessed responses via a 5-point Likert scale on the following criteria: response specificity, evidence basis, completeness, referrals to outside resources, and avoiding speaking in absolutes. Responses were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test (SAS 9.4). RESULTS: The AAFP review scored highest in response specificity, evidence basis, and completeness. Large language models differed significantly on whether responses were evidence based (P<.0001), made referrals to outside resources (P<.001), or spoke in absolutes (P<.05). Notably, GPT-3.5 and Bard consistently provided referrals across all six questions, outperforming the AAFP text on this criteria. No significant differences were found across LLMs in response specificity or response completeness. CONCLUSION: Despite promising LLM-generated responses, the AAFP review outperformed LLMs in critical areas including evidence basis and completeness. Nonetheless, LLMs, especially GPT-3.5 and Bard, demonstrated strong potential as supplementary resources for reproductive health education.

Evaluating ChatGPT's Utility in Medicine Guidelines Through Web Search Analysis.

With the rise of machine learning applications in health care, shifts in medical fields that rely on precise prognostic models and pattern detection tools are anticipated in the near future. Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT) is a recent machine learning innovation known for producing text that mimics human conversation. To gauge ChatGPT's capability in addressing patient inquiries, the authors set out to juxtapose it with Google Search, America's predominant search engine. Their comparison focused on: 1) the top questions related to clinical practice guidelines from the American Academy of Family Physicians by category and subject; 2) responses to these prevalent questions; and 3) the top questions that elicited a numerical reply. Utilizing a freshly installed Google Chrome browser (version 109.0.5414.119), the authors conducted a Google web search (www.google.com) on March 4, 2023, ensuring minimal influence from personalized search algorithms. Search phrases were derived from the clinical guidelines of the American Academy of Family Physicians. The authors prompted ChatGPT with: "Search Google using the term '(refer to search terms)' and document the top four questions linked to the term." The same 25 search terms were employed. The authors cataloged the primary 4 questions and their answers for each term, resulting in 100 questions and answers. Of the 100 questions, 42% (42 questions) were consistent across all search terms. ChatGPT predominantly sourced from academic (38% vs 15%, p = 0.0002) and government (50% vs 39%, p = 0.12) domains, whereas Google web searches leaned toward commercial sources (32% vs 11%, p = 0.0002). Thirty-nine percent (39 questions) of the questions yielded divergent answers between the 2 platforms. Notably, 16 of the 39 distinct answers from ChatGPT lacked a numerical reply, instead advising a consultation with a medical professional for health guidance. Google Search and ChatGPT present varied questions and answers for both broad and specific queries. Both patients and doctors should exercise prudence when considering ChatGPT as a digital health adviser. It's essential for medical professionals to assist patients in accurately communicating their online discoveries and ensuing inquiries for a comprehensive discussion.

Protocol for the 2023 CERA Department Chair Survey.

CERA, the Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance, is a program sponsored by the academic family medicine organizations with the goal of supporting and improving educational research in family medicine. CERA produces surveys of different groups in academic family medicine, including an annual survey of department chairs, and members can apply to add their question sets to these surveys. This article describes the methods and demographics of the 2023 CERA Department Chair Survey. The call for proposals for the CERA Department Chair Survey was open from April 3, 2023 through May 9, 2023. Fifteen proposals were received, and five were accepted for the final survey based on scoring by peer reviewers. The Institutional Review Board of the American Academy of Family Physicians approved the survey. The final survey, including question sets from five research teams and standard demographic questions, was sent to 227 department chairs in the United States and Canada. Overall, 114 chairs responded to the survey, for a response rate of 50.2%. Demographic variables, including race/ethnicity, gender, age, and region of the country, did not differ between respondents and nonrespondents. The CERA Department Chair Survey provides a framework for members of academic family medicine organizations to conduct survey research on topics that are important to the specialty. Advantages of the CERA process include a national sample and robust response rate. Disadvantages are primarily the limitation in number of survey questions and the fact that not all proposals are accepted.

Development, implementation, and evaluation of an undergraduate family medicine program in the United Arab Emirates

BackgroundHealthcare systems rely on well-trained family medicine physicians who can offer continuous quality services to their communities and beyond. The American Academy of Family Physicians and the World Organization of Family Doctors recommend that medical curricula should have adequately supervised education and training of the learners in family medicine during their preclinical and clinical placements. However, some medical schools don’t have a comprehensive family medicine program to prepare graduates who can meet the community needs. This work aims to report the essential steps for the development, implementation, and evaluation of the family medicine program at the College of Medicine at the University of Sharjah in United Arab Emirates.MethodsWe used the Kern’s 6-step model to describe the development, implementation, and evaluation of the family medicine program. This includes problem identification, needs assessment, goals setting, educational strategies, implementation, and evaluation. During 2014–2022, we longitudinally collected essential information about the family medicine program from different stakeholders including the feedback of clinical coordinators, adjunct clinical faculty, and medical students at the end-of-clerkship. All responses were analysed to determine the effective implementation and evaluation of the family medicine program.ResultsOver the course of 8 academic years, 804 medical students, 49 adjunct clinical faculty and three College of Medicine faculty participated in the evaluation of the family medicine program. The majority of respondents were satisfied with various aspects of the family medicine program, including the skills gained, the organisation of program, and the variety of clinical encounters. The medical students and adjunct clinical faculty suggested the inclusion of e-clinics, faculty development program, and the expansion of more clinical sites for the effectiveness of the family medicine program.ConclusionsWe report a successful development, implementation, and evaluation of the family medicine program in United Arab Emirates with a positive and impactful learning experience. More attention should be paid towards a suitable representation of family medicine program in the medical curriculum with focused and targeted educational plans for medical students.

Quantifying diagnosis and treatment practices of opioid use disorder in primary care practices using chart review data

Background: Opioid misuse is a significant public health crisis. The aim sought to identify potential gaps in opioid care in primary care practices. Methods: American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) offered a monthly online educational series to seven U.S. practices. Practices were asked to complete up to 50 chart reviews for visits during two periods: February–April, 2019, and February–April, 2022. Each chart had to have an ICD-10 diagnosis of opioid misuse, opioid dependence, or opioid use. Chart reviews consisted of 14 questions derived from an American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry (AAAP) Performance in Practice activity, and then, scored based on practices’ responses. Descriptive statistics and binary logistic and multinomial regressions were used. Results: Both periods had 173 chart reviews (total: 346) from the six practices. Most chart reviews were for patients with a diagnosis of opioid dependence (2019: 90.2%; 2022: 83.2%). Three questions for assessing OUD treatment behaviors had high levels of documentation across both time periods (>85%): other drug use, treatment readiness, and treatment discussion. Discussion: Results show a gap in the treatment of patients with OUD in primary care across several clinical practice recommendations. Conclusions: Expanding OUD treatment integration to primary care remains the most promising effort to combat the opioid crisis.

Parental Leave: What Do Physician Societies Provide for Their Employees?

Parental leave yields significant health benefits for parents and children. While many medical associations endorse parental leave, it is unknown what parental leave they provide for their employees. To assess parental leave policies of national physician societies for their employees including paid versus unpaid and parity between birth mothers and non-birthing parents. A cross-sectional analysis in 2023 examined parental leave policies of national physician societies, including the American Medical Association (AMA), American Osteopathic Association (AOA), and six specialty societies: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), American College of Osteopathic Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOOG), American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), American College of Osteopathic Pediatricians (ACOP), American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP), and American College of Osteopathic Family Physicians (ACOFP). Examination of policies included: duration, whether paid or unpaid; qualifications before receiving benefit; and whether non-birthing, adoptive, and foster parents were covered. Among the eight societies surveyed, two (25%) did not disclose their policies (ACOG, ACOP), and one (12.5%) lacked a policy (ACOOG). Of the remaining five, two (40%) offered paid leave (AMA, AAP), while three (60%) provided unpaid leave in line with legal requirements (AOA, AAFP, ACOFP). Benefits for non-birthing parents mirrored those for birth mothers, although the AMA offered birth mothers enhanced benefits. Only a minority of surveyed physician societies provide paid parental leave. Physician societies should consider providing paid parental leave for their employees and making their policies publicly available to promote and model the benefit of paid parental leave.

Recommended Childhood and Adolescent Immunization Schedule: United States, 2024.

The 2024 recommended childhood and adolescent immunization schedules have been approved by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), American Academy of Family Physicians, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Nurse-Midwives, American Academy of Physician Associates, and National Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners. The schedules are revised annually to reflect current recommendations for the use of vaccines licensed by the US Food and Drug Administration.

Socio economic factors and adherence to home based exercise in people with epilepsy

Exercise is a well-established component in the management of chronic illness both as a primary prevention and secondary intervention. The assumption that in otherwise healthy individuals, higher socioeconomic status (SES) is positively associated with physical activity (PA) has been debated. We report the influence of SES on adherence to home-based exercise program in people with epilepsy (PWE) from a developing country. Participants’ response to self-reported Social Needs Screening Tool of the American Academy of Family Physicians was collected. The current study is a secondary follow-up and post-hoc analysis of data from patients we have previous published. The average age of the study population was 26.93 ± 10.20 years with 57.8 % men. Among the 116 study participants, 31 (26.72 %) were adherent to the exercise program. Unemployment (14.1 % vs. 0.0 %; p = 0.034) was higher, fewer people had least high school education (76.6 % vs 93.5 %; p = 0.050) in PWE who did not adhere to exercise program. A significantly higher number of PWE who were not adherent to exercise reported that their family members or anyone else never physically hurt them (97.6 % vs 80.6 %; p = 0.05), never threaten (94.1 % vs 74.2 %; p = 0.007) and/or never scream at them (90.6 % vs 74.2 %; p = 0.011). In PWE education and employment are associated with adherence to home-based exercise programs. The role of family support and personal safety in adherence to exercise should be evaluated in detail.

The Wise Long-Term Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors PPIs among Adults in Hospitals, Health Centers and Clinics

Background: PPIs are frequently used in hospitals, primary health care centers and private clinics. The adverse effects and interactions are numerous so, physicians’ knowledge including accurate indications after confirmations of diagnosis, duration of use and follow-up are an essential part of the treatment process. Aim: The purpose of this review tis o help health care professionals to prescribe the PPIs wisely and appropriately. Objective: To undertake a review of the literature relating to the long-term use of PPIs Data Sources: United States, Food and Drug Administration [FDA], PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, Wiley, Google Scholar, major clinical guidelines, and governmental agencies. Data Extraction: The 2 reviewers Musa Basheer Mansour and Sara Ahmedana [MBM and SEA] independently assessed the qualities of the extracted studies and summarized data of the studies for outcomes of interest and performed quality assessments based on review of published articles and the data sources. Results: We reviewed the available evidence and summarized the long-term use of PPIs as indicated by major clinical guidelines, governmental agencies, and published studies. For instance, United States, Food and Drug Administration, American Gastroenterological Association, American Academy of Family Physicians, British National Formulary, National Institutes of Health, Randomized controlled trials, Systematic review, Meta-analysis and Observational studies. Conclusion: This review will provide clinical practice with research evidence-based guidelines. Clinicians and physicians should follow the major clinical guidelines and governmental agencies to prescribe PPIs, follow their patients regularly to achieve the goals of treatment, to avoid adverse effects, drug interactions and reduce the costs. Keywords: Proton Pump Inhibitors, Food and Drug Administration, Gastrointestinal Acid Disorders, Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disorder, and peptic ulcer disease

Sun Protection: A Comprehensive 2022 Dermatologic Review

In 2018, the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) published an abridged summary of the 2016 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendations on Skin Cancer Prevention: Behavioral Counseling. We believe that a contemporary review paper that helps to expand on those recommendations and explain nuanced options for patients and providers is timely and will prove valuable.

Building Consensus on the Point-of-Care Ultrasound Skills Required for Effective Healthcare Service Delivery at District Hospitals in South Africa: A Delphi Study

Background: Despite the widespread availability of ultrasound machines in South African district hospitals, there are no guidelines on the competency in point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use required by generalist doctors in this setting. This study aimed to define the required POCUS competencies by means of consensus via the Delphi method. Methods: An online Delphi process was initiated in June 2022, using the existing American Academy of Family Physicians’ ultrasound curriculum (84 skillsets) as the starting questionnaire. Panelists were selected across the country, including two from district hospitals in each province and two from each academic family medicine department in South Africa (N = 36). In each iterative round, the participants were asked to identify which POCUS skillsets were essential, optional (region-specific), or non-essential for South African district hospitals. This process continued until consensus (>70% agreement) was achieved on all of the skillsets. Results: Consensus was achieved on 81 of the 84 skillsets after 5 iterative rounds (96.4%), with 3 skillsets that could not achieve consensus (defined as <5% change over more than 2 consecutive rounds). The final consensus identified 38 essential, 28 optional, and 15 non-essential POCUS skillsets for the South African district hospital context. Conclusions: The list of essential POCUS skillsets provided by this study highlights the predominance of obstetric- and trauma-based skillsets required for generalist healthcare workers in South African district hospitals. The findings will require priority setting and revalidation prior to their implementation across the country.

Supplementation With Bifidobacterium and Symptomatic Control in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: An Evidence-Based Review.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional gastrointestinal disorder, with a global prevalence of around 11%. Family doctors should be aware of the diagnosis and treatment of this pathology. The benefit of using probiotics is questionable. The purpose of this review is to establish the evidence of the association between Bifidobacterium supplementation and symptomatic control in patients with IBS. The research was conducted using the National Guideline Clearinghouse, National Electronic Library for Health of the British NHS, Canadian Medical Association Practice Guidelines InfoBase, Cochrane Library, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness, Bandolier, Evidence-Based Medicine Online, and PubMed. Articles published between March 2017 and March 2022in humans and written in Portuguese, Spanish, and Englishusing the terms IBS and Bifidobacterium were included. To stratify the level of evidence (LOE), the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT), from the American Academy of Family Physicians, was used. Thirty-seven articles were found corresponding to the search terms, and a total of seven articles were selected. Three clinical trials and a simple review have demonstrated improvement in symptoms, although further studies are needed. The guideline and the systematic review did not demonstrate superiority in symptomatic relief when compared to other species of probiotics. The meta-analysis did not show the efficacy of the isolated use of Bifidobacterium.The evidence of an association between supplementation with Bifidobacterium and symptomatic control in patients with IBS is not clear. Some studies seem to demonstrate benefits in improving symptoms (SORT C).

Perception of pacifier use among caregivers of infants 0-1 years of age.

American Academy of Pediatrics approves pacifier use for soothing and calming; it recommends delaying its use until breastfeeding is well established. Though pacifiers have protective effects against sudden infant death syndrome, prolonged use of a pacifier can lead to complications. American Academy of Family Physicians discourages the use by 6 months to 1 year of age. Pacifier use guidelines are not established primarily due to a paucity of information regarding initiation, termination, benefits, and harmful effects of pacifiers by parents. We aim to investigate pacifier use among caregivers of 0-1-year-old infants. It was a descriptive study of parents or caregivers of children 0-1 year of age who completed a questionnaire focused on pacifier use. Statistical analysis was calculated using SPSS version 23. One hundred thirty-three caregivers were interviewed. One hundred eighteen (88.7%) caregivers were mothers. Ninety-one (68.4%) of caregivers identified as Hispanic and 42 (30.1%) as African American. Caregivers reported that mean pacifier use was 16 months and 3.4 h/day. One hundred six (80%) reported the most common use of the pacifier alone was to calm the baby. For the weaning method, 37 (27.8%) stated that gradual decrease of pacifiers was useful whereas 33 (24.8%) stated that abrupt removal of pacifiers was effective. Seventy-two (54.1%) reported that their family and friends recommended pacifiers. Eleven (8.3%) caregivers reported that information about pacifiers was provided by medical and day-care providers. Pacifier use was not significantly related to the feeding method during the first 2 months of life. This study identifies impressions and common misconceptions of pacifier use which may assist in the development of comprehensive guidelines.

Therapeutic Options for Migraines in the Microsurgical Patient: A Scoping Review.

There exists an increasing array of treatments proposed to prevent, alleviate, and abort symptoms of a migraine; however, for patients who undergo reconstructive microsurgery, caution must be taken to preserve vascular integrity. This study is the first-to-date scoping review of vascular and bleeding risk of current migraine therapies, with the purpose of identifying potential therapeutic agents for postoperative migraine management appropriate for microsurgical patients. Currently available migraine therapeutics were compiled from the UpToDate software system and the American Academy of Family Physicians. A PubMed literature review was performed for each therapeutic's effect on bleeding or vascular involvement. Data were compiled into tables of abortive, symptom-controlling and prophylactic, and nonpharmacologic treatments. Expert microsurgeons reviewed the data to provide recommendations for optimized patient care. Triptans and other ergot derivatives demonstrated strong evidence of vasoconstriction and were greatly advised against for immediate postmicrosurgical use. Novel pharmaceutical therapies such as lasmiditan and calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonists have no literature indicating potential for vasoconstriction or hematoma and remain an investigational option for abortive medical treatment. For symptom control, acetaminophen appears the safest option, with clinical judgment and further research needed for use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Alternative treatment techniques may include migraine prophylaxis with botulinum toxin injection or nutraceutical treatment by means of magnesium supplementation or coenzyme Q10 administration, minimizing the need for additional medication in the postoperative setting. Patients undergoing reconstructive microsurgery have a unique medical profile limiting the therapeutic options available to treat migraines. This review provides preliminary evidence to be considered as a guide for prescribing therapeutics for migraine in the postoperative setting.