Ambulatory Surgery Center Research Articles

A Proposed Patient Selection Algorithm for Total Joint Arthroplasty Same-Day Discharge from an Ambulatory Surgery Center

IntroductionIdentifying appropriate patients for same-day discharge total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is critical for maintaining optimal patient safety and outcomes. This study investigated patient outcomes after same-day discharge TJA at a single ambulatory surgery center (ASC) and proposes a TJA patient-selection algorithm based on findings and existing literature. MethodsA retrospective chart review of 660 patients was performed between July 2019 and October 2021 for all patients who underwent primary TJA in a single ASC. Successful same-day discharge (SDD), length of surgery (LOS), estimated blood loss (EBL), complications, and readmission events were recorded for each patient. There were 20 total complications in 331 primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) (6.0%) and 15 total complications in 329 primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) (4.6%). ResultsThere was one direct admission to the hospital in TKA patients and four direct admissions in THA patients, making the successful SDD rate 99.7% in TKAs, 98.8% in THAs, and 99.2% overall. In the TKA cohort, body mass index (BMI) was associated with total complications (r = -0.15, P = 0.006), comorbidities with wound complications (P = 0.006), and EBL was with readmissions (r = 0.30, P < 0.001), revision surgery (r = 0.12, P = 0.04), and total complications (r = 0.16, P = 0.03). In the THA cohort, BMI was weakly associated with wound complications (r = -0.12, P = 0.02), EBL was with emergency department visits (r = 0.18, P = 0.002) and total complications (r = 0.14, P = 0.01). However, there was no direct association between any of the analyzed characteristics and direct admission. ConclusionIn our ASC cohort, patients had low rates of perioperative complications and hospital admissions, supporting the safety of same-day discharge TJA using our proposed evidence-based algorithm to guide patient selection for same-day discharge.

Privately negotiated facility fees at ambulatory surgery centers and hospitals.

Private negotiated facility fees at hospitals are on average double the ambulatory surgery center facility fees for common outpatient procedures.

Practical Implications of Value Based Care in the Setting of Ambulatory Surgery Center

Practical Implications of Value Based Care in the Setting of Ambulatory Surgery Center

A Cold Winter Day.

Description I am a post-anesthesia care unit nurse who works in a busy ambulatory surgery center, and I consider myself a closet photographer. I love taking photographs of nature. It helps me relax and focus after a busy day. This photograph was taken on my way home on a very cold and snowy day. I found the trees stunning with their white snowy branches contrasting the black asphalt road. Such a peaceful view of nature.

Surgical Treatment of Pediatric Foot and Ankle Fractures in a Freestanding Ambulatory Surgery Center is a Safe, Cost-effective Alternative to a Hospital.

In the United States, the number of pediatric fractures treated in ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) continues to increase. Few studies have compared the outcomes and complications of treating these injuries in a freestanding ASC versus in a hospital setting. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes, treatment times, and costs for treatment of pediatric foot and ankle fractures in the ASC and hospital. A retrospective review identified pediatric patients with isolated, closed, and acute (below 3wk) distal tibia, ankle, or foot fractures who underwent closed reduction in an operating room or operative fixation between January 2015 and December 2019. The patients were divided into 2 groups: ASC and hospital. Medical records were reviewed for patient demographics, mechanism of injury, surgical time, facility time, costs for treatment, and complications. Preoperative and postoperative alignment was assessed on radiographs. Clinical outcomes included pain, weight-bearing, or deformity at final follow-up. Multivariable generalized linear models and logistic regression were used to determine the association between surgical setting and treatment outcomes, times, and costs. Two hundred and twenty-three patients were identified; 115 treated in the ASC and 108 treated in the hospital. Adjusted for age at treatment, injury type, procedure performed, and preoperative alignment, there were no differences in surgical time, clinical or radiographic outcomes, or complications between groups. The mean total operating room time, total facility time, and total charges were significantly lower in patients treated in the ASC than in the hospital. Pediatric distal tibia, ankle, and foot fractures can be safely treated in an ASC with equivalent outcomes and complications compared with those in a hospital setting. Benefits include shorter total surgical and facility times as well as decreased cost of care. These findings could allow for patients to receive more timely and efficient treatment with less financial burden. Level III-therapeutic.

Patient-Level Value Analysis in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Optimizing the Value of Care Delivery

Background: Value is defined as the ratio of patient outcomes to the cost of care. One method to assess value is through patient-level value analysis (PLVA). To our knowledge, this tool has not previously been implemented in the setting of total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purposes of this study were to perform PLVA for a 1-year episode of care among patients undergoing primary THA and to identify characteristics that affect value in a metropolitan health-care system. Methods: The patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure database of the institution was queried for all primary THAs from 2018 to 2019. The PRO measure that was utilized was the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement (HOOS-JR). Cost was evaluated with use of time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) for a 1-year episode of care (consisting of the day of surgery, inpatient stay, discharge facility, postoperative appointments, and physical therapy). The primary outcome was the 1-year value quotient, or the ratio of the 1-year change in HOOS-JR to the cost of the episode of care (VHOOS). The value quotient was compared among all included patients and evaluated for variables that may affect the overall value of the episode of care. Results: In total, 480 patients were included in the analysis. The mean improvement in the HOOS-JR was +34.9 ± 16.1 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 33.5, 36.3). The mean cost was $13,835 ± $3,471 (95% CI: $13,524, $14,146). The largest contributor to cost was implants (39.0%), followed by post-recovery care (i.e., inpatient stay and specialized nursing facilities; 24.1%). Change in the HOOS-JR was poorly correlated with the cost of care (r = −0.06; p = 0.19). THAs performed at an ambulatory surgery center (ASC) with discharge to home demonstrated higher value (VHOOS = 0.42) than THAs performed at a hospital with discharge to a rehabilitation facility (VHOOS = 0.15; analysis of variance F-test, p &lt; 0.01). Conclusions: Our study found that PROs did not correlate with costs in the setting of primary THA. Implants were the largest cost driver. Surgical setting (an ASC versus a hospital) and discharge destination influenced value as well. PLVA is a value measurement tool that can be utilized to optimize components of the care delivery pathway. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Critical patient safeguards for ambulatory surgery centers.

The role of ambulatory surgery centers in surgical care is evolving, as lower facility fees and improved patient experience increase the popularity of these venues. As care expands in ambulatory surgery center, so does the complexity of cases and patients cared for in these centers, which may pose a risk for patient safety. Anesthesiologists should lead multidisciplinary teams to screen for appropriate patients and procedures. Patient considerations go beyond physical status and include psychosocial factors. Ensuring patients understand preoperative instructions is crucial to decrease case cancellation rates and facilitate efficiency. Pediatric patients require special considerations including extra attention to preprocedure and postoperative care and instructions, PALS-certified staff, pediatric equipment and medications, as well as heightened awareness of respiratory complications. Procedural concerns start with the capabilities of the facility such as equipment, pharmacy, and staffing for each phase of care. However, nuances such as patient throughput in a given day, emergency preparedness, and after-hours staffing will affect both patient safety and staff morale. This article outlines the issues leaders need to consider to ensure patient safety in ambulatory surgery centers.

Implant Cost Awareness Among Orthopaedic Surgeons at a Single Academic Institution

Introduction Despite the increasing costs of implants, surgeons’ awareness of these costs varies widely. The purpose of this study is to determine baseline awareness of sports-medicine-related implant cost among orthopaedic surgeons. Methods A survey including images of 10 different orthopaedic implants related to sports medicine was sent to 18 surgeons. All included surgeons practice in a single ambulatory surgery center and routinely perform sports-medicine-related procedures. Surgeons were asked to estimate the cost of each implant and answer questions about surgeon characteristics. Cost estimates were compared with implant cost found in the institutional charge master database. Results Cost estimates varied widely among providers regardless of fellowship training. The average percent error among all providers was 54.3%. Surgeons that rated knowledge of implant cost to be important most or all of the time had an average cost estimate error of 60.7% versus 48.0% error in their counterparts that stated that knowledge of cost was important to them only some of the time, though this did not reach statistical significance. Low-cost implants were more likely to be overestimated while high-cost implants were more often underestimated. Years of experience, sports medicine fellowship training, and involvement in contract negotiations had no effect on implant cost accuracy. Conclusion Implant cost awareness is dishearteningly low sports medicine orthopaedists despite the large economic impact of these devices. There is considerable room for improving cost awareness in sports medicine.

Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Hospital Outpatient Versus Ambulatory Surgery Center Lumbar Decompression Surgery.

Retrospective Chart Review. Outpatient spinal surgeries in Ambulatory Surgery Centers (ASCs) have gained traction due to their potential cost efficiencies and improved perioperative processes. This study aims to compare the cost-effectiveness and patient outcomes of lumbar laminectomies performed in hospital settings vs ASCs. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 771 patients who underwent 1 or 2-level outpatient laminectomy between 2019 and 2023. Patient demographics, 90-day and one-year clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and one-year episode of care costs were evaluated. A one-year cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using the EQ-5D to measure quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). ASC patients demonstrated lower body mass index and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores, with a higher prevalence of 1-level laminectomies compared to hospital patients. ASC-based laminectomy was associated with lower initial surgery cost and one-year episode of care costs ($5662 ± 4748 vs $10229 ± 9202, P < 0.001), with similar rates of complications and postoperative resource utilization. These trends remained after controlling for patient demographics, comorbidities, and number of levels treated. In patients completing baseline and 1-year EQ-5D scores, ASC-based laminectomy was over twice as cost-effective as hospital procedures ($64873/QALY gained vs $152630). The findings support the safety and one-year cost effectiveness of ASCs for appropriately selected patient populations undergoing lumbar laminectomy. Additional studies are needed to replicate these findings across institutions, and to assess the cost effectiveness of ASC-based laminectomy beyond one-year postoperatively.

Ambulatory surgery center versus outpatient hospitals: a comparison of reimbursements for patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

Background ContextWhile some studies have demonstrated that ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) are associated with reduced costs of orthopedic procedures, there is no consensus in the current literature as to the impact of ASCs versus hospital-based outpatient departments (HOPDs) on anterior cervical discectomies and fusions (ACDFs). PurposeThis study sought to (1) compare immediate procedure reimbursements, patient out-of-pocket expenditures, and surgeon reimbursements for ACDFs performed at ASCs versus HOPDs and (2) identify factors predicting facility utilization. Study DesignRetrospective cross-sectional study. Patient SampleWe identified ACDF procedures performed at an ASC or HOPD in commercially-insured patients aged 18 to 64. Outcome MeasuresPayment variables were calculated from claims within 3 days preoperatively and postoperatively. MethodsMultivariable regression models assessed (1) associations between the surgery setting and payment variables and (2) factors associated with the surgery setting. ResultsWe included 18,191 ACDFs (14.8% ASC, 85.2% HOPD). In multivariable analyses, ACDFs performed in an ASC (versus HOPD) were associated with 9.8% higher immediate procedure reimbursements (95% CI:7.5%–12.2%), 17.2% higher patient out-of-pocket expenditures (95% CI:11.8–22.8), and 11.7% higher surgeon reimbursements (95% CI:9.18–14.2; all p<.01) (all p<.001). Surgery setting utilization varied by region, insurance-related factors, comorbidities, and procedural complexity. ConclusionsWe found that ASCs had significantly higher reimbursements compared to HOPDs. Regional variations in ASC utilization imply there are opportunities for standardization of care. Level of evidence3.

The Outpatient Experience in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty - How to Perform Safely in the Ambulatory Surgery Center

The number of outpatient unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) procedures has increased substantially over the last decade. The ambulatory surgery center (ASC) and hospital outpatient department provide a safe, cost-effective alternative with a significant cost savings to the healthcare system. Advancements in technology and perioperative management strategies have expanded the number of eligible patients to optimize outcomes with a focus on safety. Therefore, this review will describe the safety, efficacy, economics, and perioperative protocols for performing UKA in an outpatient setting. Patient selection, risk factors, patient education and expectations, anesthesia, pain management strategies, and outcomes will be discussed.

Reply to Editorial Comment on “Safety and Efficacy of Same-day Discharge for Men Undergoing Contemporary Robotic-assisted Aquablation Prostate Surgery in an Ambulatory Surgery Center Setting—First Global Experience”

Reply to Editorial Comment on “Safety and Efficacy of Same-day Discharge for Men Undergoing Contemporary Robotic-assisted Aquablation Prostate Surgery in an Ambulatory Surgery Center Setting—First Global Experience”

Editorial Comment on "Safety and Efficacy of Same Day Discharge for Men Undergoing Contemporary Robotic-Assisted Aquablation Prostate Surgery in an Ambulatory Surgery Center Setting - First Global Experience"

Editorial Comment on "Safety and Efficacy of Same Day Discharge for Men Undergoing Contemporary Robotic-Assisted Aquablation Prostate Surgery in an Ambulatory Surgery Center Setting - First Global Experience"

Posterior Cruciate Ligament Preservation versus Posterior Cruciate Ligament Sacrifice: Comparing Patient Outcomes in Medial Congruent Total Knee Arthroplasty.

This study aimed to compare outcomes and complication rates between posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) retention and excision utilizing a medial congruent (MC) polyethylene insert in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in a specialized ambulatory surgery center (ASC) dedicated to hip and knee arthroplasty. A retrospective review was performed between May 2023 and October 2023 analyzing 398 patients who underwent primary MC TKA by high-volume joint arthroplasty surgeons (n = 9) with either PCL preservation (n = 264) or sacrifice (n = 134) in a single free-standing ASC. Patients were matched chronologically on a 2:1 basis. Demographics, baseline function, 90-day complications, and patient-reported outcomes were recorded for each patient. There were no differences in preoperative baseline function or patient-reported outcome measures, Charlson Comorbidity Index, or American Society of Anesthesiologists class among patient groups. The PCL-preserve and PCL-sacrifice cohorts showed significant variation in 12-week postoperative Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome, Junior (KOOS, JR.) scores. Specifically, the number of patients who achieved the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in KOOS, JR. scores was higher in the PCL-sacrifice group (p < 0.05). Yet, no complications within the 90-day period were associated with PCL status and other patient-reported outcomes. This study comparing outcomes between MC TKAs with PCL retention and sacrifice suggests that both techniques are viable options with similar functional outcomes, pain scores, and complication rates, which may have benefits in an ASC setting. The PCL-sacrifice group exhibited a statistically significant increase in patients who achieved the MCID in KOOS, JR. score compared with the PCL-preserving at early follow-up. Future research should employ prospective, randomized designs to further validate these findings and explore long-term implications.

Routine preoperative assessment for cataract surgery is a source of frustration for primary care providers

BackgroundCataract surgery is one of the most common surgical procedures performed in older adults in the United States and is generally considered to be extremely low-risk. As of 2019, routine preoperative evaluation within 30 days of surgery is no longer mandated by the United States of America (USA) Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for ambulatory surgery centers, but it is unclear how primary care providers perceive this change.MethodsWe performed a qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with six primary care providers to explore primary care providers’ perspectives on routine preoperative assessment for cataract surgery.ResultsPrimary care providers commented on the large number of referrals they receive for preoperative assessment before cataract procedures. The analysis revealed an overarching sentiment of resentment over the time, effort, and resources expended on these assessments. Themes included the lack of awareness of the updated regulations that no longer require a history and physical to be completed within 30 days and the perception of a universal lack of medical necessity to perform preoperative assessment for cataract surgery. Providers also commented on the strain on limited resources and the burden on patients. The relationship between specialties and professional roles emerged as another important theme.ConclusionsReferrals for preoperative clearance for cataract surgery continue to burden providers, patients, and the health system, and represent an opportunity to streamline care in this patient population.

LEAN Methodology to Improve Endoscopy Unit Efficiency in a Multi-subspecialty Ambulatory Surgery Center: A Pilot Study.

Background and objective Efforts to improve gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy unit efficiency may lead to increases in colon cancer screening volumes. LEAN management principles applied to GI endoscopy unit practices may serve as a novel foundation for efficiency improvements.We conducted apilot study in an outpatient, hospital-based GI endoscopy unit with the goal of improving endoscopy efficiency by using LEAN principles Methodology A single endoscopist and anesthesiologist along with the nursing care team implemented changes to their practice based on LEAN principles. Efficiency metrics were tracked before these changes and after to assess for improvements. Results We observed statistically significant improvements in waiting room time (13.1 minutes vs. 25.6 minutes, p<0.001), recovery room duration (55.5 minutes vs. 61.8 minutes, p=0.01), total facility time (172.5 minutes vs. 196.1 minutes, p<0.001), and true completion time (19.7 minutes vs. 32.3 minutes, p=0.002) after the implementation of LEAN interventions. Conclusions A systematic and standardized approach using LEAN methodology canimprove GI endoscopy unit operational efficiency. Larger studies are needed to validate our findings and generalize the results to the field broadly.

Evaluation of prepectoral reconstruction surgical outcomes: Main operating room vs ambulatory surgery center

IntroductionDuring the height of the recent Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, many surgeries were transitioned to ambulatory surgery centers to reserve inpatient resources and reduce transmission risks. Our study evaluated surgical outcomes of patients who underwent prepectoral breast reconstruction in the operating rooms of two full-service main hospitals versus their associated surgery centers. MethodsA retrospective chart review was conducted of patients who underwent immediate prepectoral breast reconstruction at a single hospital between 2018 and 2022. Eligible patients had at least 3 months of post-expander follow-up, with the majority also having 3 months of post-implant follow-up. Patient demographics, reconstructive characteristics, post-expander outcomes, and post-implant outcomes were evaluated between the surgery center and main operating room with Chi-square (or Fisher’s exact) and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. ResultsThis study included 301 patients, outcomes of 509 post-expander breasts, and outcomes of 410 post-implant breasts. The patient characteristics were similar with the only significant difference being the hospital length of stay (increased stay at the main hospital). There were no statistically significant differences in any of the surgical outcomes between the two groups in the post-expander or post-implant period. ConclusionThe COVID-19 pandemic disrupted elective procedures, prompting a shift towards outpatient surgery to optimize hospital resources and reduce inpatient exposure risks. While breast reconstruction is elective, delays can pose risks for cancer patients. Our results show that surgical outcomes for prepectoral prosthetic breast reconstruction remain consistent whether performed in outpatient surgical centers or main hospitals.

The effect of dexmedetomidine on emergence delirium of postanesthesia events in pediatric department: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Emergence delirium (ED) is a common occurrence in pediatric postanesthesia events, leading to negative outcomes. Dexmedetomidine (DEX), as an anesthesia adjuvant, has shown promise in preventing ED in adult surgeries, and it has been increasingly used in pediatric surgical settings. However, its effectiveness in other postanesthesia events, such as MRI examinations and ambulatory surgery centers, remains unclear. This meta-analysis aims to assess the safety and efficacy of DEX in preventing ED in various pediatric postanesthesia events beyond surgery. Prospective randomized controlled trials were searched in Pubmed, Web of Science, and EBSCO until October 13, 2023. Comparisons were made between DEX and other sedatives or analgesics in different postanesthesia events (including surgery operations, the examination of MRI, day surgery, and invasive action). Subgroup analyses were conducted based on drug delivery methods, medication timing, DEX dosages, use of analgesics, event types, and recovery time. A total of 33 trials involving 3395 patients were included. DEX significantly reduced the incidence of ED (odds ratios [OR] = 0.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.19-0.27, I2 = 37%, P < .00001). Intranasal delivery of DEX was the most effective (OR 0.18, 95% CI: 0.10-0.32, P < .00001, I2 = 0%). DEX also showed benefits in day surgery and mask insertion events (OR 0.30, 95% CI: 0.14-0.26, P = .001, I2 = 0%). DEX demonstrates superior efficacy in preventing ED in pediatric postanesthesia events compared to other sedatives and analgesics. Its use is recommended in various settings for its safety and effectiveness in managing ED.

Interfacility Competition and its Impact on Cost of Carpal Tunnel Release.

Carpal tunnel release (CTR) is the most common hand surgery procedure, but little is known about how healthcare market characteristics influence cost. The objective of this study was to understand the association of healthcare market competition and facility availability on out-of-pocket and total insurer payments for patients undergoing CTR. This retrospective cross-sectional study used a national sample of private insurance claims from 2015-2020. Adults who had CTR were included, while acute or inpatient CTRs, or lacking geographical information were excluded. Linear regression was applied to investigate the impact of the healthcare market competition and facility availability (ambulatory surgery center (ASC), hospital outpatient departments (HOPD), outpatient clinics) on the out-of-pocket expenses and total insurer payment. Market competition was measured using the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index. Of 119,828 patients, 76% underwent open CTR. The most competitive hospital markets were HOPDs and ASCs, respectively. As HOPD competition decreased, out-of-pocket expenses and total insurer payment decreased significantly. As ASC competition decreased, only total insurer payments decreased significantly. CTRs performed in outpatient clinics increased slightly over time. However, HOPDs remained the most common location until 2020 when their popularity was similar to ASCs. Finally, out-of-pocket expenses increased significantly whereas total insurer payments did not change significantly throughout the study period. This study found decreased healthcare market competition was not associated with increased CTR costs, suggesting that costs are complex and multifactorial. To reduce healthcare costs, this study supports the movement of CTRs to clinic and ASCs.

Since the COVID-19 pandemic, approximately 90% of elective anesthetics have been ambulatory: A retrospective analysis of statewide data in Florida from 2010 through 2022

BackgroundWhen the vast majority (e.g., ≈90%) of a specialty's elective (scheduled) care is ambulatory (i.e., length of stay 0 or 1 night), the administrative, clinical, and economic policy implications are profound. We examined the progressive shift of elective anesthetics in Florida from inpatient to ambulatory, from the first quarter of 2010 through the fourth quarter of 2022. We were particularly interested in the most recent data following the lifting of COVID-19 restrictions on elective surgery in the state. MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included major therapeutic and major diagnostic procedures with >0 American Society of Anesthesiologists base units in the state of Florida inpatient and ambulatory surgery databases. The last 8 quarters of these operating room anesthetic data corresponded to the end of restrictions on elective surgery in Florida due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Our goal was to determine whether the overall mean percentage of cases with 0- or 1-day lengths of stay has reached 90% since the lifting of pandemic restrictions. Numbers of cases over periods of at least four weeks tend to follow normal distributions. Therefore, we analyzed the N = 8 quarters of cases from 2021 to 2022 using Student's t-test. The study was performed when there were N = 8 quarters available from the Florida healthcare databases. ResultsThere were overall 22,584,752 surgical cases studied. The percentages of elective anesthetics with length of stay ≤1-day increased progressively from 2010 through 2020. Among the eight successive quarters since the end of pandemic-related elective surgery restrictions, the percentage of elective cases with length of stay 0- or 1 day was stable, averaging 90% (95% two-sided confidence interval 89.4% to 90.3%). ConclusionSince the COVID-19 pandemic, the mean quarterly percentage of elective surgery cases with anesthesia in Florida that were ambulatory has been reliably ≈90%. Implications include value in expecting overnight post-anesthesia care unit stay in ambulatory surgery centers and scheduling and sequencing cases based on post-anesthesia care unit capacity. Furthermore, because the vast majority (i.e., ≈90%) of cases would be excluded (i.e., not involve hospital admission for at least 2 midnights), there is a minimal role that risk-adjusted hospital length of stay and mortality can have in evaluating anesthesia department overall quality and economic effectiveness.