Spine is the most common site for metastases in the skeletal system. Longer lifespans of patients with common cancers are translating into increasing incidence of patients with symptomatic spinal metastases. Surgery for spinal metastases offers immediate neurological decompression with stabilization and preservation of quality-of-life parameters. The objectives of the study were to assess the effect of pre-operative neurological condition, timing, and type of surgery on postoperative neurological function and long-term outcome as well as to analyze the various sources of primary in cases of symptomatic spinal metastases and the spinal level involved in terms of postoperative neurological function and ambulation. A retrospective analysis of all operated cases of symptomatic spinal metastases at our institute over a period of 5 years was performed. Parameters such as neurological presentation, timing of surgery, source of primary, and radiological features of the metastases were assessed and compared with the type of surgery performed, post-operative neurological function, and long-term outcome. The in-house hospital information system was to collect data. A total of 94 patients were operated on for symptomatic spinal metastases, the dorsal spine was the most common location and hematological malignancies were the most common primary overall and among men whereas breast was the most common primary in females. Overall, 64.8% of the patients had neurological motor deficits of which 72% had an improvement in motor power. We found that patients with a pre-operative motor power of 3/5 or more likely to have an improvement in post-operative neurological function and ambulatory status. Surgery for symptomatic spinal metastases plays a vital role in preserving the quality of life of the patients. Patients with preoperative motor power of 3/5, spastic tone, and features of mechanical back pain alone have good ambulatory outcomes post-spine surgery.