Ambulatory Blood Pressure Control Research Articles

The association of sex differences in ambulatory blood pressure with cardiovascular events and mortality in dialysis patients.

Male patients with pre-dialysis chronickidneydisease(CKD) have worse ambulatory blood pressure(BP) control than females; this is associated with higher mortality. Male hemodialysis patients have higher ambulatoryBP levels than females. This analysis aimed to investigate the association of sex differences in ambulatory BP with cardiovascular events and mortality in hemodialysis individuals. 129 male and 91 female hemodialysis patients with valid 48-h BP monitoring were followed for 53.4 ± 31.1 months. The primary endpoint was cardiovascular mortality; the secondary endpointwas a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardialinfarction, non-fatal stroke, resuscitation after cardiacarrest, heartfailure-hospitalization, coronary or peripheral revascularization. Cumulativefreedom from the primary endpoint was lower for women (logrank-p = 0.032), while cumulative-freedom from the secondary endpoint did not differ significantly between-groups (logrank-p = 0.644). The crude risk for cardiovascular mortality was significantly higher in women (HR = 1.613, 95% CI[1.037, 2.509]). The crude risk for the combined endpoint was not different between the two groups (HR = 0.918, 95% CI[0.638, 1.320]). After adjusting for major risk factors (age, diabetes, dialysis vintage, coronary disease and hemoglobin) no significant differences in the risk for both the primary and the secondary endpoint were observed between women and men (primary: HR = 1.295 (95% CI[0.808, 2.078]), secondary: HR = 0.763 (95% CI[0.521, 1.118])). After additional adjustment for 44-h systolicBP the above relationships did not alter (primary: HR = 1.329 (95% CI [0.826, 2.137]), secondary: HR = 0.808 (95% CI [0.551, 1.184])). In conclusion, female hemodialysis patients have higher crude but similar adjusted cardiovascular mortality rates compared to male counterparts. In contrast to pre-dialysis CKD, the neutral relationship between gender and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in hemodialysis is not further affected by ambulatory BP.

Predictors of daytime blood pressure, nighttime blood pressure, and nocturnal dipping in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Increasing attention has recently been paid to discrepancies between office and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) control in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), but information on mechanisms underlying circadian BP variations in CKD remains scarce. We described circadian BP patterns and their predictors in patients with CKD stages 1 to 5 referred for kidney function testing in a French tertiary hospital: 1122 ambulatory BP measurements from 635 participants. Factors associated with daytime and nighttime systolic BP (SBP) as well as with nocturnal SBP dipping (ratio of average nighttime to daytime SBP) were analyzed with linear mixed regression models. Participants (mean age 55 ± 16 years; 36% female, mean GFR 51 ± 22 mL/min/1.73m2) had a mean daytime and nighttime SBP of 130 ± 17 and 118 ± 18 mm Hg, respectively. The prevalence of impaired dipping (nighttime over daytime SBP ratio ≥ 0.9) increased from 32% in CKD stage 1 to 68% in CKD stages 4-5. After multivariable adjustment, measured GFR, diabetes, and sub-Saharan African origin were more strongly associated with nighttime than with daytime SBP, which led to significant associations with altered nocturnal BP dipping. For a 1 SD decrease in measured GFR, nighttime BP was 2.87 mmHg (95%CI, 1.44-4.30) higher and nocturnal SBP dipping ratio was 1.55% higher (95%CI, 0.85-2.26%). In conclusion, the prevalence of impaired nocturnal BP dipping increases substantially across the spectrum of CKD. Along with sub-Saharan African origin and diabetes, lower measured GFR was a robust and specific predictor of higher nighttime BP and blunted nocturnal BP decline.

STRICTER AMBULATORY BLOOD PRESSURE CONTROL IS POSSIBLE IN PATIENTS AFTER KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION AND IS ASSOCIATED WITH REGRESSION OF LEFT VENTRICULAR HYPERTROPHY: POST HOC ANALYSIS

Objective: The recently published analysis of the 4C-T study demonstrated an association of stricter cumulative office blood pressure (BP) control with lower left ventricular mass (LVM) in children after kidney transplantation. The aim of our study was to investigate whether stricter control of ambulatory BP is also associated with improved LVMI and regression of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. Design and method: A post-hoc analysis of nineteen patients (median age at baseline 9.7 years, range 3.3–15.1, median time after transplantation 4.3 years, range 1.0-13.1) from our previous ESCORT trial who had echocardiography performed at baseline (T0), 1 (T1), 2 (T2) and 3 (T3) years was performed. Cumulative 24-hour mean arterial pressure (MAP) Z-scores (CMAPz) were calculated according to 4C-T study (Sugianto et al. 2023). Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) was defined as LVMi>40 g/m^2.7 in girls >9 yrs of age and LVMi>45 g/m^2.7 in boys >9 yrs of age; in children <=9 yrs the LVH was defined as LVMi >95th percentile (Khoury et al 2009). Results: The median CMAPz decreased from a median +0.27 (IQR=-0.09 to +0.38) in the 1st year down to -0.06 (IQR=-0.26 to +0.32) in the 2nd year (p=0.02) and to +0.05 (IQR=-0.32 to 0.27) in the 3rd year (p=0.04) of follow-up. The prevalence (number) of children with LVH was 26% (5/19) at T0, 16% (3/19) at T1, 23% (3/13) at T2 and 0% (0/11) at T3 (trend in proportions p=0.06). All 5 children with elevated LVMi>0.9 at T0 decreased / normalized their LVMi at T3 (p=0.07), on contrary children without LVH at baseline did not significantly change their LVMi during follow-up. Conclusions: This first prospective interventional study demonstrated an association between stricter cumulative ambulatory MAP and regression of LVH in patients after kidney transplantation. Our data suggest that aiming stricter ambulatory BP can improve the often unfavourable cardiac phenotype in these patients. However, randomized control trial is required to confirm our findings.

Ambulatory blood pressure after 12 weeks of quadruple combination of quarter doses of blood pressure medication vs. standard medication.

A combination of four ultra-low-dose blood pressure (BP) medications lowered office BP more effectively than initial monotherapy in the QUARTET trial. The effects on average ambulatory BP changes at 12 weeks have not yet been reported in detail. Adults with hypertension who were untreated or on monotherapy were eligible for participation. Overall, 591 participants were randomized to either the quadpill (irbesartan 37.5 mg, amlodipine 1.25 mg, indapamide 0.625 mg, and bisoprolol 2.5 mg) or monotherapy control (irbesartan 150 mg). The difference in 24-h, daytime, and night-time systolic and diastolic ambulatory BP at 12 weeks along further metrics were predefined secondary outcomes. Of 576 participants, 289 were randomized to the quadpill group and 287 to the monotherapy group. At 12 weeks, mean 24-h ambulatory SBP and DBP were 7.7 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 9.6-5.8] and 5.3 (95% CI: 6.5-4.1) mmHg lower in the quadpill vs. monotherapy group ( P < 0.001 for both). Similar reductions in the quadpill group were observed for daytime (8.1/5.7 mmHg lower) and night-time (6.3/4.0 mmHg lower) BP at 12 weeks (all P < 0.001) compared to monotherapy. The rate of BP control (24-h average BP < 130/80 mmHg) at 12 weeks was higher in the quadpill group (77 vs. 50%; P < 0.001). The reduction in BP load was also more pronounced with the quadpill. A quadruple quarter-dose combination compared with monotherapy resulted in greater ambulatory BP lowering across the entire 24-h period with higher ambulatory BP control rates and reduced BP variability at 12 weeks. These findings further substantiate the efficacy of an ultra-low-dose quadpill-based BP lowering strategy.

Seasonal variation in ambulatory blood pressure control in patients on clinic blood pressure-guided antihypertensive treatment.

We investigated seasonal variation in ambulatory blood pressure control in hypertensive patients on clinic blood pressure-guided antihypertensive treatment. The study participants were hypertensive patients enrolled in an 8-week therapeutic study. Antihypertensive treatment was initiated with long-acting dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers amlodipine 5 mg/day or the gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) formulation of nifedipine 30 mg/day, with the possible up-titration to amlodipine 10 mg/day or nifedipine-GITS 60 mg/day at 4 weeks of follow-up. The proportion of up-titration to higher dosages of antihypertensive drugs at 4 weeks of follow-up was higher in patients who commenced treatment in autumn/winter ( n = 302) than those who commenced treatment in spring/summer ( n = 199, 24.5 vs. 12.0%, P < 0.001). The control rate of clinic blood pressure, however, was lower in autumn/winter than in spring/summer at 4 (56.7 vs. 70.7%, P = 0.003) and 8 weeks of follow-up (52.5 vs. 74.9%, P < 0.001). At 8 weeks, patients who commenced treatment in autumn/winter, compared with those who commenced treatment in spring/summer, had a significantly ( P ≤0.03) smaller daytime (mean between-season difference -3.2/-2.8 mmHg) but greater nighttime SBP/DBP reduction (3.6/1.6 mmHg). Accordingly, at 8 weeks, the prevalence of nondippers was significantly ( P < 0.001) higher in spring/summer than in autumn/winter for both SBP (54.8 vs. 30.0%) and DBP (53.4 vs. 28.8%). Clinic blood pressure-guided antihypertensive treatment requires a higher dosage of medication in cold than warm seasons, which may have led to over- and under-treatment of nighttime blood pressure, respectively.

Effect of initial treatment with a single pill containing quadruple combination of quarter doses of blood pressure medicines versus standard dose monotherapy on ambulatory blood pressure indices

Abstract Background The QUARTET trial showed that a combination of four ultra-low-dose blood pressure (BP) medications lowered mean unattended office BP more effectively than initial monotherapy. Purpose To investigate the effects of a combination of four ultra-low-dose blood pressure (BP) medications on ambulatory BP changes. Methods Australian adults (≥18 years) with hypertension who were untreated or on monotherapy were eligible for participation in the QUARTET study. Overall, 591 participants were randomly assigned to receive either the quadpill (containing irbesartan 37.5 mg, amlodipine 1.25 mg, indapamide 0.625 mg, and bisoprolol 2.5 mg) or an indistinguishable monotherapy control (irbesartan 150 mg). The difference in 24-hour, daytime and night-time systolic and diastolic ambulatory BP at 12 and 52 weeks were pre-defined secondary outcomes. Reported parameters for this analysis were derived from ambulatory BP recordings of 576 participants that fulfilled pre-defined validation criteria. Results Of 576 participants, 289 were randomized to the quadpill group and 287 to the monotherapy group. At baseline, 24-h systolic/diastolic BP was 139.2/81.0 mmHg in the monotherapy vs. 139.8/81.3 in the quadpill group, daytime BP was 142.5/83.5 vs 143.4/84.0 mmHg, and night-time BP was 125.1/70.7 vs. 125.4/70.7 mmHg. At 12 weeks, mean 24-h ambulatory systolic and diastolic BP were 7.7 (95%CI: 9.6, 5.8) and 5.3 (95%CI: 6.5, 4.1) mmHg lower in the quadpill versus monotherapy group (p&amp;lt;0.001 for both). Similar reductions were observed for daytime (8.1/5.7 mmHg lower in quadpill compared to montherapy group) and night-time (6.3/4.0 mmHg lower in quadpill compared to monotherapy group) BP (all p&amp;lt;0.001) at 12 weeks. The reduction in systolic and diastolic ambulatory BP variability were more pronounced in the quadpill group at 12 weeks, the 24-h standard deviation was reduced by -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5) mmHg for systolic and -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4) mmHg diastolic BP. The rate of BP control (24 hours BP ≥130 and/or ≥80 mmHg) at 12 weeks was higher in the quadpill group (77% vs 50%; p&amp;lt;0.001). These effects were maintained at 52 weeks. Conclusion A quadruple quarter-dose combination compared to monotherapy resulted in greater ambulatory BP lowering across the entire 24-hour period with higher ambulatory BP control rates at both 12 and 52 weeks. These findings further substantiate the efficacy of an ultra-low-dose quadpill-based BP lowering strategy – which has been previously shown not to increase the rate of side effects - and extends it to ambulatory BP measurements.

Different Home Blood Pressure Thresholds to Predict Perfect 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Control in Treated Hypertension Based on an "All-in-One" Device.

Home blood pressure (BP) is an important component of digital strategies for hypertension management. However, no studies have used the same device to investigate 24-hour BP control status in relation to different home BP control thresholds. Participants in the general practitioner-based, multicenter HI-JAMP study (Home-Activity Information and Communication Technology-Based Japan Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Prospective) underwent office BP measurement, then 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring, then home BP monitoring for 5 days. A validated all-in-one BP monitoring device was used to measure office, home, and ambulatory BP. Baseline data were used to investigate ambulatory BP control status in individuals with well-controlled home BP based on the different guideline thresholds (125/75 mm Hg, 130/80 mm Hg, and 135/85 mm Hg). Data from 2269 patients were analyzed. For individuals with well-controlled home BP <135/85 mm Hg (59.5% of the total population), the prevalence of uncontrolled 24-hour (≥130/80 mm Hg), daytime (≥135/85 mm Hg), and nighttime ambulatory BP (≥120/70 mm Hg) was 19.9%, 18.5%, and 33.6%, respectively. Corresponding prevalence rates in the 42.7% of participants with well-controlled home BP <130/80 mm Hg were 13.4%, 12.9%, and 26.0%, and when well-controlled home BP was strictly defined as <125/75 mm Hg (23.9% of the population), prevalence of rates of uncontrolled 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime ambulatory BP were 7.0%, 9.0%, and 15.3%, respectively. Home BP control status defined using different thresholds could predict 24-hour ambulatory BP control status in treated hypertension. One-third of individuals still had uncontrolled nocturnal hypertension when home BP was controlled to <135/85 mm Hg, but ambulatory BP was quite well controlled when home BP was <125/75 mm Hg.

#5608 THE INFLUENCE OF AMBULATORY BP ON THE ASSOCIATIONS OF SEX WITH CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS AND MORTALITY IN DIALYSIS PATIENTS: A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

Abstract Background and Aims Male patients with pre-dialysis CKD have worse ambulatory BP control than females and this is associated with higher mortality risk. Male hemodialysis patients have higher ambulatory BP levels compared to females. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of ambulatory BP on the associations of sex with cardiovascular events and mortality in hemodialysis individuals. Method 129 male and 91 female hemodialysis patients with valid 48-hour ABPM were followed prospectively for 53.4±31.1 months. The primary endpoint was cardiovascular mortality; the secondary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, resuscitation after cardiac arrest, hospitalization for heart failure, coronary or peripheral revascularization procedure. Results Cumulative-freedom from the primary endpoint was significantly lower for women (logrank-p = 0.032), while cumulative-freedom from the secondary endpoint did not differ significantly between the two groups (logrank-p = 0.644). The crude risk for cardiovascular mortality was significantly higher for women (HR = 1.613, 95% CI [1.037, 2.509]). The crude risk for the combined cardiovascular endpoint was not different between the two genders (HR = 0.918, 95% CI [0.638, 1.320]). After adjusting for other risk factors (age, diabetes, dialysis vintage, coronary disease) no significant differences in the risk for both the primary and the secondary endpoint were observed between women and men (primary: HR = 1.464 (95% CI [0.929, 2.307]), secondary: 0.866 (95% CI [0.596, 1.260])). After additional adjustment for 44-hour ambulatory BP the above relationships did not alter (primary: HR = 1.498, 95% CI [0.947, 2.368]), secondary: (HR = 0.911, 95%CI [0.625, 1.327])). Conclusion In contrast to patients with pre-dialysis CKD, ambulatory BP does not appear to significantly influence the relationship between gender and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in hemodialysis patients.

USE OF COMBINATION TREATMENT IN HYPERTENSION MANAGEMENT AND ITS ASSOCIATION WITH HYPERTENSION CONTROL

Objective: Achievement of blood pressure (BP) targets in hypertension is crucial for cardiovascular prevention and, in most cases, requires combined pharmacological treatment. Current ESC/ESH Guidelines for hypertension management recommend initiating treatment with combination therapy in most hypertensives, except low-risk individuals with mildly elevated BP. Our aim was to assess how this recommendation is applied in practice and whether it is associated with differences in hypertension control. Design and method: In the setting of an ongoing cardiovascular prevention trial (CV-PREVITAL) we prospectively recruited 278 hypertensive patients with no history of cardiovascular disease, among individuals who responded to the advertisement campaign in outpatient facilities of Istituto Auxologico Italiano. Physical examination, standard routine blood tests, office blood pressure recording and standard 24h ABPM has been performed at baseline. We analyzed the office and ambulatory BP control in relationship to the number of antihypertensive drugs and cardiovascular risk assessed by SCORE for low risk countries. Results: Median age of our sample was 61 years, with balanced gender distribution. Ninety-nine (36%) participants were not receiving any pharmacological treatment, 106 (41%) were on monotherapy and 73 (23%) on combined treatment. Comparison of principal characteristics among the three groups is shown in Table 1. Among study participants 44 (16%) had low to moderate CV risk and 227 (84%) had high or very high estimated risk. The percentage of participants receiving combined treatment in these groups was 4.1% and 22.5%, respectively, and the percentage of patients with well controlled office/ambulatory BP was 50%/41% in low to moderate risk and 35%/65% in high to very high risk participants, respectively. Conclusions: In this sample of patients with known hypertension, a considerable proportion received substandard treatment (no treatment or monotherapy), even among those at high risk. This was associated with worse BP control in these individuals. Implementation of current hypertension guidelines in practice remains largely suboptimal.

THE INFLUENCE OF AMBULATORY BLOOD PRESSURE ON THE ASSOCIATIONS OF SEX WITH CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS AND MORTALITY IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING HEMODIALYSIS: A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

Objective: Male patients with pre-dialysis CKD have worse ambulatory BP control than females and this is associated with higher mortality risk. Male hemodialysis patients have higher ambulatory BP levels compared to females. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of ambulatory BP on the associations of sex with cardiovascular events and mortality in hemodialysis individuals. Design and method: 129 male and 91 female hemodialysis patients with valid 48-hour ABPM were followed prospectively for 53.4±31.1 months. The primary endpoint was cardiovascular mortality; the secondary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, resuscitation after cardiac arrest, hospitalization for heart failure, coronary or peripheral revascularization procedure. Results: Cumulative-freedom from the primary endpoint was significantly lower for women (logrank-p = 0.032), while cumulative-freedom from the secondary endpoint did not differ significantly between the two groups (logrank-p = 0.644). The crude risk for cardiovascular mortality was significantly higher for women (HR = 1.613, 95% CI [1.037, 2.509]). The crude risk for the combined cardiovascular endpoint was not different between the two genders (HR = 0.918, 95% CI [0.638, 1.320]). After adjusting for other risk factors (age, diabetes, dialysis vintage, coronary disease) no significant differences in the risk for both the primary and the secondary endpoint were observed between women and men (primary: HR = 1.464 (95% CI [0.929, 2.307]), secondary: 0.866 (95% CI [0.596, 1.260])). After additional adjustment for 44-hour ambulatory BP the above relationships did not alter (primary: HR = 1.498, 95% CI [0.947, 2.368]), secondary: (HR = 0.911, 95%CI [0.625, 1.327])). Conclusions: In contrast to patients with pre-dialysis CKD, ambulatory BP does not appear to significantly influence the relationship between gender and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in hemodialysis patients.

Gender-Related Differences in the Levels of Ambulatory BP and Intensity of Antihypertensive Treatment in Patients Undergoing Peritoneal Dialysis.

Prior studies have shown that among patients with chronic kidney disease not yet on dialysis, the faster progression of kidney injury in men than in women is, at least partly, explained by sex differences in ambulatory blood pressure (BP) control. The present study aimed to investigate potential differences in the levels of ambulatory BP and intensity of antihypertensive treatment between men and women with end-stage kidney disease undergoing long-term peritoneal dialysis (PD). In a case-control design, 48 male PD patients were matched for age and heart failure status with 48 female patients in a 1:1 ratio. Ambulatory BP monitoring was performed with an oscillometric device, the Mobil-O-Graph (IEM, Stolberg, Germany). The BP-lowering medications actually taken by the patients were prospectively recorded. No gender-related differences were observed in 24 h systolic BP (129.0 ± 17.9 vs. 128.5 ± 17.6 mmHg, p = 0.890). In contrast, 24 h diastolic BP was higher in men than in women (81.5 ± 12.1 vs. 76.8 ± 10.3 mmHg, p = 0.042). As compared with women, men were being treated with a higher average number of antihypertensive medications daily (2.4 ± 1.1 vs. 1.9 ± 1.1, p = 0.019) and were more commonly receiving calcium-channel-blockers (70.8% vs. 43.8%, p = 0.007) and β-blockers (85.4% vs. 66.7%, p = 0.031). In conclusion, the present study shows that among PD patients, the levels of ambulatory BP and intensity of antihypertensive treatment are higher in men than in women. Longitudinal studies are needed to explore whether these gender-related differences in the severity of hypertension are associated with worse cardiovascular outcomes for male patients undergoing PD.

Effectiveness of Amlodipine in the Control of 24-Hour Blood Pressure in Mild-to-Moderate Essential Hypertension: A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Real-World Study from India.

Background Calcium-channel blockers (CCB) are a mainstay in the management of hypertension (HTN), and amlodipine is the preferred CCB due to its longer half-life and better safety. Patients and methods This practice-based, observational, real-world evidence study assessed the 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) control in mild-to-moderate essential hypertensive patients (treatment naïve receiving amlodipine monotherapy, or as add-on therapy) in inadequately controlled blood pressure (BP goal not met after one month of existing therapy). One hundred four (62M/42F) patients between 18 and 65 years of age who received amlodipine 5/10 mg/day for >8 weeks were included after obtaining informed written consent. The primary outcome was a change from baseline in the mean 24-hSBP and DBP on ABP monitoring at eight (±1) weeks. Secondary outcomes were different from baseline in the mean morning, day-time, night-time, and last six-hour dosing interval period. Other outcomes assessed BP variability (dippers and non-dippers), and responder rates based on ABP monitoring and in-clinic trough cuff measurements. Safety outcomes included adverse effects reported, electrocardiogram, and laboratory abnormalities (hepatic and renal function). Changes in BP parameters in different sub-groups (age, gender, BMI, physical activity, occupation, duration of hypertension, the total daily dose of amlodipine, type of amlodipine therapy, and hypertension severity at baseline) were estimated. Results Of the 104 patients, 49 patients (completed eightweeks) were included in the per-protocol (PP) data for efficacy analysis. Safety analysis was done on the intent-to-treat (ITT) dataset. Significant reductions (p<0.0001) from baseline in all BP measurements on ABPM were observed at the end of eight weeks. Similar improvements were observed in office BP recordings. There was a marginal but non-significant (p>0.05) increase in the proportion of dippers and extreme dippers with amlodipine at the end of the eight-week treatment period. Conclusions Amlodipine 5/10 mg/day therapy used as monotherapy or adjuvant therapy provided significant reductions in both office BP and ambulatory BP over eight weeks.

Home blood pressure measurement for hypertension management in the real world: Do not just measure, but share with your physician.

Studies of the effectiveness of home blood pressure (BP) measurement on the treatment of hypertension in the real world are sparse, and the results are controversial. There is an efficacy-effectiveness gap in the treatment of hypertension using home BP measurements. We aimed to investigate the effect of reporting home BP to physicians on ambulatory BP control as a factor contributing to the efficacy-effectiveness gap in treating patients with hypertension. We recruited patients ≥20 years of age taking antihypertensive drugs. Office and 24-h ambulatory BP were measured. A questionnaire to the measurement of home BP was conducted. Participants were divided into an HBPM(-) group, home BP was not measured (n = 467); HBPM(+)-R(-) group, home BP was measured but not reported (n = 81); and HBPM(+)-R(+) group, home BP was measured and reported (n = 125). The HBPM(+)-R(+) group had significantly lower office systolic BP (SBP, p = 0.035), 24-h SBP (p = 0.009), and daytime SBP (p = 0.016) than the HBPM(-) group, and lower nighttime SBP (p = 0.005) and diastolic BP (DBP, p = 0.008) than the HBPM(+)-R(-) group. In the multivariate analysis, the differences in 24-h SBP, daytime SBP, and nighttime DBP remained significant. There was a significant difference between groups in the target achievement rate of 24-h SBP (p = 0.046), nighttime SBP (p = 0.021), and nighttime DBP (p = 0.023). The nighttime SBP and DBP target achievement rates in the HBPM(+)-R(+) group were higher than those in the HBPM(+)-R(-) group (p = 0.006 and 0.010, respectively). Among patients measuring home BP, the adjusted odds ratio for 24-h and nighttime BP target achievement in the HBPM(+)-R(+) group were 2.233 and 3.658, respectively. Home BP measurements should be reported to the treating physician to effectively manage hypertension. https://clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT03868384.

Results of the prospective observation in routine practice of hypertensive patients with concomitant chronic respiratory diseases. Part II. Predictors of adverse events

Aim. To study the predictors of adverse events in hypertensive (HTN) patients, including those with chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs).Material and methods. Regression analysis evaluated clinical and anamnestic data and blood pressure (BP) in outpatients with stage II-III HTN (n=156): 49 patients had asthma, 20 — chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; age — 63,4±8,8 years, women — 72,4%, followup duration 29,3±8,0 months. The outcomes included in the composite primary endpoint (EP) were registered in 32 patients (death, major cardiovascular events and complications), while the secondary EPs were registered in 57 patients (hospitalizations, emergency calls, temporary disability due to cardiovascular disease/CRD, hypertensive crisis, exacerbation of CRD, pneumonia, respiratory failure), and tertiary EP — in 76 (other significant diseases/conditions, including increased blood pressure without hypertensive crisis, requiring correction of regular therapy).Results. Predictors of primary EPs were the decrease level of nocturnal diastolic BP (DBP) (β=-5,335, p=0,026), nocturnal DBP variability (β=1,796, p=0,007), blood leukocyte level (β=0,241, p=0,039); secondary EPs — systolic blood pressure ≥170 mm Hg in history (β=1,305-1,641, p=0,037-0,017), statin use (β=-0,997, p=0,037), CRD (β=0,734, p=0,023), blood platelet level (β=-0,008, p=0,022); tertiary EPs — only CRD (β=1,082, p&lt;0,0001).Conclusion. Patients with HTN need complex multifactorial prevention. It is necessary to improve the control of office and ambulatory blood pressure, blood lipids, especially in the presence of CRD, to improve the control of CRDs themselves. The method of 24-hour blood pressure monitoring should be used more often in routine practice, including assessing the degree of nocturnal blood pressure reduction and its variability.

PS-C10-9: EFFECTIVENESS OF AMLODIPINE ON 24-HOUR AMBULATORY BLOOD PRESSURE IN ADULT PATIENTS WITH MILD-MODERATE ESSENTIAL HYPERTENSION: A MULTICENTRE OBSERVATIONAL, REAL-WORLD STUDY

Objective: Inadequate 24-hour blood pressure control could cause complications, especially in high-risk hypertensive individuals. Hence, it is recommended that the targeted blood pressure levels be maintained round the clock. This prospective, observational study assessed the 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) control with 8-week amlodipine therapy 5/10 mg/day in patients with hypertension. Methods: Adult patients (62 m, 42 f) with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension received oral amlodipine 5 mg/day (n = 68) or 10 mg/day (n = 36) for 8 weeks. The study was approved by the independent ethics committee and informed consent was obtained from all participants. Primary outcome was change at 8 weeks from baseline in mean 24-hr ABP (systolic and diastolic), and secondary outcomes were change from baseline in mean morning, daytime, night-time, and last 6-hr dosing interval ABP. A repeat measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was done for changes in ABP over 8 weeks, with age, gender, BMI and associated comorbidities as covariates. Nocturnal dippers were assessed as those greater than or equal to 10% reduction in ABP at 8 weeks. Sub-groups were created based on age, duration of hypertension, occupation, baseline BMI and amlodipine dose. Safety was evaluated based on clinical adverse events and 12-lead electrocardiogram. Results: Of the 104 patients from 2 study centers, 49 completed 8-weeks therapy and were included for per-protocol analysis. Significant reductions in the mean 24-hr blood pressure were seen for both SBP and DBP (figure 1). The mean 24-hr. reduction was -10.82 and -6.25 mmHg with 5 mg amlodipine and -19.81 and -11.19 mmHg with 10 mg amlodipine for SBP and DBP respectively (p &lt; 0.0001). The mean morning, daytime, night-time, and last 6-hr reductions in SBP were -14.06, -18.63, -20.42, and -13.51 respectively (p &lt; 0.0001), and DBP reductions were -7.78, -10.27, -11.07, and -6.44 respectively (p &lt; 0.0001). Significant reduction in ABP was seen in all sub-groups (p &lt; 0.0001). Greater reduction in SBP and DBP were observed in patients with stage-2 hypertension. At baseline, there were 30 (61.2%) non-dippers which decreased to 18 (36.7%) at 8 weeks. At the end of the study, 40% of non-dippers were converted to dippers by Amlodipine, whereas none of the dippers were converted to non-dippers. No adverse effects were reported. Conclusion: Amlodipine significantly reduces the 24-hr. mean morning, daytime, night-time, and last 6-hr. ABP and converted non dippers to dippers in adult patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. The Study highlights the consistent effects of amlodipine on both quantity and quality of 24 hours BP control which is important for associated CV risk reduction.

The use of tenoxicam in active axial spondyloarthritis – focus on efficacy and safety

Purpose of the study – to study the efficacy and safety of tenoxicam (Texared®) in patients with active axial spondyloarthritis.Material and methods. The study included 35 patients with active axial spondyloarthritis with BASDAI≥4.0. Patients were given continuous oral tenoxicam (Texared®, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories) at a dosage of 20 mg/day. Subsequently, 5 patients were excluded from the study due to discontinuation of the drug after 5–10 days of administration. 30 patients were included in the final analysis. Initially and after 30 days, to assess the severity of pain and stiffness, activity, patients filled out questionnaires in electronic form using Google forms, a general assessment of pain in the lower back and the intensity of night pain by the patient, subjective sleep characteristics were carried out. The doctor calculated the BASDAI, ASDAS-CRP, BASMI indices, and evaluated the activity according to the doctor’s opinion. The baseline blood pressure level was determined, and a patient diary was issued for ambulatory blood pressure measurement in the morning/evening for 30 days. After 30 days, the patient’s ambulatory blood pressure control was assessed. At baseline and after 30 days, biochemical blood parameters were studied, including a complete blood and urine test.Results and conclusion. In patients with axial spondyloarthritis with high and very high activity, a positive effect of tenoxicam (Texared®) therapy on disease activity was noted. The effect of Texared® develops with regular use already during the first 2 weeks, and after 4 weeks there is a clear decrease in the severity of pain in the lower back, a decrease in the duration of morning stiffness. The drug is well tolerated, has a favorable safety profile, no serious adverse events and few side effects that do not require discontinuation of therapy.

Association between nocturnal blood pressure dipping and chronic kidney disease

Abstract Introduction Management of blood pressure (BP) in chronic kidney disease (CKD) is critical for preventing cardio-renal complications. While increasing attention has been given to discrepancies between office and ambulatory BP control in this population, information on nocturnal BP decrease patterns (dipping) in CKD is still scarce. Purpose We aimed at describing nocturnal BP dipping patterns and its predictors in patients with CKD. Methods We analysed data from patients with CKD stages 1 to 5 referred for kidney function testing from September 2006 to January 2022, including 24-hour urine collection, gold-standard measurement of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) using clearance of a radioisotopic tracer, as well as ambulatory BP measurement (ABPM) in a single tertiary hospital in Paris, France. A total of 1177 ABPM were available in 642 participants. The magnitude of dipping was calculated as the difference between day- and night-time systolic BP (SBP), in percentage of daytime SBP. Participants were then categorized as extreme-dippers (≥20%), dippers (10% to &amp;lt;20%), non-dippers (0% to &amp;lt;10%), or reverse-dippers (&amp;lt;0%). Factors associated with a less than 10% dipping were analysed with crude and adjusted logistic regression models including a random intercept to deal with clustering of measurements within patients. Results Participants (mean age 56±15 years; 35% female, mean GFR 49±21 mL/min per 1.73 m2) consisted of 8% extreme-dippers, 37% dippers, 40% non-dippers, and 15% reverse-dippers. The prevalence of non- or reverse-dipping increased with CKD severity, from 36% in CKD stage 1 to 65% in CKD stages 4–5 (Figure). In crude analyses, African origin, a lower measured GFR, a higher daytime SBP, diabetes, a higher number of antihypertensive medications and a higher 24-hour urinary sodium to potassium ratio (24h Na/K) were associated with abnormal dipping status. In the multivariable adjusted regression, non or reverse dipping was independently associated with measured GFR (odds ratio [OR, 95% confidence interval] per 10 ml/min/1.73 m2 decrease = 1.16 [1.06–1.26], p=0.001), daytime ambulatory SBP (OR per 10 mmHg decrease = 1.17 [1.06–1.28], p=0.001), African origin (OR= 1.56 [1.04–2.34], p=0.03) and 24h Na/K (OR per 1-unit increase = 1.20 [1.06–1.37], p=0.006). Conclusions The prevalence of nocturnal non-or reverse dipping BP profiles increases substantially across the spectrum of CKD. Measured GFR, ambulatory daytime SBP, African origin and 24-hour urinary sodium to potassium ratio are independent predictors of abnormal nocturnal BP decrease and thus may help in cardiovascular risk stratification in this population. More research is needed on whether nocturnal dipping may be a treatment target to reduce cardiorenal complications. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Sex differences in ambulatory blood pressure levels, control and phenotypes of hypertension in hemodialysis patients.

Ambulatory blood pressure (BP) control is worse in men than women with chronic kidney disease or kidney transplantation. So far, no study investigated possible sex differences in the prevalence, control, and phenotypes of BP according to predialysis and 48-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in hemodialysis patients. Further, no study has evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of predialysis BP in male and female hemodialysis patients. One hundred and twenty-nine male and 91 female hemodialysis patients that underwent 48-h ABPM were included in this analysis. Hypertension was defined as: (1) predialysis SBP ≥140 or DBP ≥90 mmHg or use of antihypertensive agents, (2) 48-h SBP ≥130 or DBP ≥80 mmHg or use of antihypertensive agents. Predialysis SBP did not differ between groups, while DBP was marginally higher in men. 48-h SBP (137.2 ± 17.4 vs. 132.2 ± 19.2 mmHg, P = 0.045), DBP (81.9 ± 12.1 vs. 75.9 ± 11.7 mmHg, P < 0.001) and daytime SBP/DBP were higher in men. The prevalence of hypertension was not different between groups with the use of predialysis BP or 48-h ABPM (92.2% vs. 89%, P = 0.411). However, concordant lack of control was more frequent in men than women (65.3% vs. 49.4%, P = 0.023). The prevalence of white-coat and masked hypertension did not differ between groups; the misclassification rate with the use of predialysis BP was marginally higher in women. In both sexes, predialysis BP showed low accuracy and poor agreement with ABPM for diagnosing ambulatory hypertension [area-under-the-curve in receiver-operating-curve analyses (SBP/DBP): men, 0.681/0.802, women: 0.586/0.707]. Ambulatory BP levels are higher in male than female hemodialysis patients. Although hypertension prevalence is similar between sexes, men have worse rates of control. The diagnostic accuracy of predialysis BP was equally poor in men and women.

Dipping Status, Ambulatory Blood Pressure Control, Cardiovascular Disease, and Kidney Disease Progression: A Multicenter Cohort Study of CKD

Ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring allows concurrent evaluation of BP control and nocturnal BP dipping status, both related to adverse outcomes. However, few studies have assessed the prognostic role of combining information on dipping status and achieved ambulatory BP in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Prospective observational cohort study. 906 patients with hypertension and CKD attending 1 of 3 Italian nephrology clinics. Four groups were defined by simultaneously classifying systolic ambulatory BP levels as being at goal (daytime SBP<135 and nighttime SBP<120 mm Hg) or above goal, and the presence or absence of nocturnal dipping (nighttime to daytime SBP ratio of<0.9 versus≥0.9). The composite of time to initiation of maintenance dialysis or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline≥50%, and the composite of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate risks of kidney disease progression and cardiovascular disease in the 4 exposure groups where nocturnal dipping with systolic ambulatory BP at goal was the reference group. The mean patient age was 63.8 years, 61% were male, and 26.4% had diabetes; eGFR was 41.1 ± 20.8 mL/min/1.73 m2. The dipping prevalence in each of the 4 groups was as follows: nocturnal dipping with ambulatory BP at goal, 18.6%; no nocturnal dipping with ambulatory BP at goal, 20.5%; nocturnal dipping with ambulatory BP above goal, 11.8%; and no nocturnal dipping with ambulatory BP above goal, 49.1%. Among patients with ambulatory BP above goal, the risk of cardiovascular events was greater in the absence (HR, 2.79 [95% CI, 1.64-4.75]) and presence (HR, 2.05 [95% CI, 1.10-3.84]) of nocturnal dipping. The same held true for risk of kidney disease progression (HRs of 2.40 [95% CI, 1.58-3.65] and 2.11 [95% CI, 1.28-3.48] in the absence and presence of nocturnal dipping, respectively). Patients at the ambulatory BP goal but who did not experience nocturnal dipping had an increased risk of the cardiovascular end point (HR, 2.06 [95% CI, 1.15-3.68]) and the kidney disease progression outcome (HR, 1.82 [95% CI, 1.17-2.82]). Lack of a diverse cohort (all those enrolled were White). Residual uncontrolled confounding. Systolic ambulatory BP above goal or the absence of nocturnal dipping, regardless of ambulatory BP, is associated with higher risks of cardiovascular disease and kidney disease progression among patients with CKD. Among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring improves the identification of individuals at high risk of clinical disease outcomes. Those with uncontrolled ambulatory BP are known to have a higher risk of developing cardiovascular disease and kidney disease progression, particularly when their ambulatory BP does not decline by at least 10% at night. Whether this is also true for patients with presence of optimal ambulatory BP levels but a BP pattern of no nighttime decline is largely unknown. We measured ambulatory BP in 900 Italian patients with CKD and followed them for several years. We found that, independent of ambulatory BP level, the absence of nighttime reductions in BP was associated with worsening of CKD and more frequent cardiovascular events. The absence of nighttime declines in BP is an independent risk factor for adverse events among patients with CKD. Future studies are needed to examine whether treating the absence of nighttime declines in BP improves clinical outcomes.

IMPACT OF LONG-TERM USE OF CPAP TREATMENT ON BLOOD PRESSURE AMONG REFRACTORY HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS WITH OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA

Objective: To assess blood pressure response to long-term continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment among patients with refractory hypertension (RfHTN) with moderate and severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Design and method: An observational prospective study was performed in 26 patients (35.7% male, average age 59.3 ± 7.9 years) with diagnostic of RfHTN and moderate and severe OSA who were divided in 2 groups to use CPAP (CPAP group, n = 13) or not (control group, n = 15). All of them were submitted to clinical follow-up and their anti-hypertensive medication was adjusted according to the assistant physician. 24-hour ABPM was performed both at the beginning and at the end of the study. Primary outcomes were changes in office and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) and BP control. The comparison between groups of BP changes were calculated by a general linear model with group allocation as a fixed factor and adjusted by its respective BP basal values in addition to gender and age. Results: The median follow-up time was 68 months (IQR: 49–81 months). CPAP and control groups were similar in their baseline demographic, anthropometric, laboratory characteristics, and office and ambulatory BP. They had mean systolic and diastolic 24-hour BP of 142 (15) and 83 (14), respectively. At the end of follow-up, refractory patients using CPAP had a reduction of 8.5 and 5.0 mmHg of office systolic and diastolic BP with an intergroup difference (CPAP and control) of 13.5 (-15.2 – 42.3) mmHg and 10.1 (-7.5 – 5.4) mmHg, respectively. The most important difference between groups was noticed at nighttime with an intergroup difference of 10.0 (-8.6 – 28.7) mmHg of systolic BP and 6.7 (-3.9 – 17.3) mmHg of nighttime diastolic BP. Out of 28 initial refractory patients, 12 are not refractory anymore, being 3 (20%) in control group and 9 (69.2%) in CPAP group with a significant difference between the groups (p = 0.02) Conclusions: Long-term use of CPAP among refractory hypertensive patients with moderate/severe OSA seems to be effective to reduce and control blood pressure measured both in the office BP and 24-hour ABPM, especially lowering nighttime blood pressure.