Alveolar Bone Grafting In Patients Research Articles

Influence of Preoperative Inflammatory Status on Outcomes of Alveolar Bone Grafting in Patients With Cleft Lip.

After secondary alveolar bone grafting, the outcome of bone formation is always a problem that leads to repeat surgery. Bone formation is closely related to the inflammatory and immune status of patients. To achieve better bone formation results, this study aimed to investigate the influence of preoperative inflammatory indicators on the bone survival ratio (BSR) of secondary alveolar bone grafting. A retrospective study was conducted on 62 patients who underwent surgery by the same surgeon between January 2016 to December 2022. Demographic and laboratory data were included as independent variables. The BSR calculated from computed tomography data was included as the dependent variable. Pearson correlation analysis, Spearman correlation analysis, and multiple linear regression analysis were performed. The analysis results revealed significant correlations between BSR and preoperative inflammatory markers, including neutrophil percentage, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte percentage (L%), lymphocyte count, and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio. Multiple linear regression identified L% as an independent factor of BSR, with lower L% associated with higher BSR. Preoperative inflammatory markers may influence BSR after alveolar bone grating. A lower value of L% indicates a better postoperative bone formation outcome. Understanding these associations can aid clinicians in treatment planning and patient stratification.

Speech Outcomes after Delayed Hard Palate Closure and Synchronous Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting in Patients with Cleft Lip, Alveolus and Palate.

Background The best timing of closure of the hard palate in individuals with cleft lip, alveolus, and palate (CLAP) to reach the optimal speech outcomes and maxillary growth is still a subject of debate. This study evaluates changes in compensatory articulatory patterns and resonance in patients with unilateral and bilateral CLAP who underwent simultaneous closure of the hard palate and secondary alveolar bone grafting (ABG). Methods A retrospective study of patients with nonsyndromic unilateral and bilateral CLAP who underwent delayed hard palate closure (DHPC) simultaneously with ABG at 9 to 12 years of age from 2013 to 2018. The articulatory patterns, nasality, degree of hypernasality, facial grimacing, and speech intelligibility were assessed pre- and postoperatively. Results Forty-eight patients were included. DHPC and ABG were performed at the mean age of 10.5 years. Postoperatively hypernasal speech was still present in 54% of patients; however, the degree of hypernasality decreased in 67% ( p < 0.001). Grimacing decreased in 27% ( p = 0.015). Articulation disorders remained present in 85% ( p = 0.375). Intelligible speech (grade 1 or 2) was observed in 71 compared with 35% of patients preoperatively ( p < 0.001). Conclusion This study showed an improved resonance and intelligibility following DHPC at the mean age of 10.5 years, however compensatory articulation errors persisted. Sequential treatments such as speech therapy play a key role in improvement of speech and may reduce remaining compensatory mechanisms following DHPC.

D33. A Comparative Analysis of the Use of rhBMP-2 with Iliac Crest Bone Graft for Alveolar Bone Grafting in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate: A Review of 527 Cases

D33. A Comparative Analysis of the Use of rhBMP-2 with Iliac Crest Bone Graft for Alveolar Bone Grafting in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate: A Review of 527 Cases

Three-dimensional evaluation of secondary alveolar bone grafting in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate: A 2-3 year post-operative follow-up.

The present study aims to quantitatively assess secondary alveolar bone graft (SABG) resorption in unilateral cleft lip, alveolus and palate (UCLAP) patients in a 2-3 year longitudinal follow-up setting by using a validated 3D protocol. Furthermore, the potential relation of SABG resorption with maxillary canine position and a number of patient-related factors was investigated. UCLAP patients who underwent SABG and had good quality CBCT images at the following timepoints were included in the study: pre-operative (T0), immediate (T1), 6 months (T2) and either 1-2 years (T3) or 2-3 years (T4) post-operative. The final bone grafted region was defined on the T1 scans and refined in the registered T0 scans. The bone graft after resorption was determined by applying threshold-based segmentation on the registered T2, T3 or T4 scans within the segmented bone graft volume. The position of the canines was determined at every timepoint at the cleft and non-cleft side. Forty-five UCLAP patients (mean age 9.0 ± 1.3 years) were included. In the first 6 months after SABG, 43.6% bone resorption was recorded. 2-3 years post-operative, 56% bone resorption was found if the maxillary canine was not yet erupted and 42.7% if it erupted through the graft. The vertical position of the canines was significantly higher on the cleft side at T3. The present study reports significant SABG resorption over time. However, no correlation was found between SABG resorption and canine position, nor between other patient-related factors.

The Effect of Insurance Status and Medicaid Expansion on Timing of Alveolar Bone Grafts in Patients with Orofacial Clefts: A Cohort Study Utilizing the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) Database

The Effect of Insurance Status and Medicaid Expansion on Timing of Alveolar Bone Grafts in Patients with Orofacial Clefts: A Cohort Study Utilizing the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) Database

A Comparison of Three-Dimensional Cone Beam Computed Tomography Outcomes between Early versus Late Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting in Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

A Comparison of Three-Dimensional Cone Beam Computed Tomography Outcomes between Early versus Late Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting in Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

A Comparison of Three-Dimensional Cone Beam Computed Tomography Outcomes Between Early Versus Late Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting in Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

A Comparison of Three-Dimensional Cone Beam Computed Tomography Outcomes Between Early Versus Late Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting in Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

It's Hip to Go Home: An Evaluation of Outpatient Alveolar Bone Grafting in Patients With Cleft Palate.

Secondary alveolar bone grafting (ABG) is a common procedure performed at cleft care centers used to fill the alveolar cleft. The advent of techniques such as minimally invasive trephine drill harvest and placement of continuous-infusion pain pumps at the donor site has made outpatient ABG an increasingly feasible and cost-effective procedure. However, enhanced recovery after surgery protocols to maximize pain control and recovery times for this patient population have not been well established. A retrospective single-institution review was conducted of pediatric patients with cleft palate who underwent iliac crest bone graft ABG at a large urban academic children's hospital from 2017 to 2022. Patient age, alveolar cleft repair laterality, pain scores, surgery duration, hospital LOS, readmissions, and re-operations within 30 days were examined. Fifty-four patients met our inclusion criteria. Fifty patients (92.6%) received a pain pump during the operation. The median duration of surgery and LOS in the post-anesthesia care unit were 1.28 and 1.75 hours, respectively. Fifty-two patients (96.3%) were discharged on the same day as their surgery whereas 2 patients (3.7%) stayed in the hospital overnight. The median pain score at the time of discharge was 0 (interquartile range 0, 0). There were 6 (11.1%) minor complications including 5 pain pump malfunctions and 1 recipient site wound breakdown. There was 1 readmission (1.9%) for development of a surgical site infection at the hip and no re-operations within 30 days of surgery. The described outpatient ABG protocol demonstrates effective postoperative pain control, short hospital LOS, and few complications requiring hospital readmission or reoperation.

Evaluation of Dental Root Development Regarding Maxillary Canine Eruption Status after Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate.

In children born with cleft lip and palate, the timing of the secondary alveolar bone graft (SABG) is crucial to its success; this involves estimating the eruption of the permanent maxillary canine. Altered dental eruption in this patient group gives impetus to the identification of dental developmental factors concerning maxillary canine eruption, which may steer the clinical decision of SABG timing. Records of over nine hundred patients who received SABG with pre- and post-operative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were analyzed for inclusion and divided into two groups (erupting or non-erupting canine after SABG). Roots of the maxillary canines and premolars were segmented from the cementoenamel junction then linear and volumetric measurements were performed. The pre- and post-operative root length and volume differences were calculated and compared statistically using independent sample tests and paired t-tests. No statistically significant differences were found in the volume change (%), or reciprocal of mean root length in the erupted and unerupted groups in the canine, first premolar, or second premolar roots except for an association between the post-operative dental root length of the canine and the maxillary canine eruption status. Therefore, assessment of root development from pre-treatment CBCT scans was not deemed worthy from a diagnostic perspective.

Efficacy of Demineralized Bone Matrix for Revision Alveolar Bone Grafting in Patients Previously Treated with Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 (BMP-2).

This study investigates the effectiveness of demineralized bone matrix (DBX) to close alveolar clefts in patients previously treated with bone morphogenic protein-2 (BMP-2) who remained with bone nonunion. This is an IRB-approved retrospective, single-center study. This study was conducted at a tertiary academic center. We searched for all surgical encounters with the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code 42210 from the years 2013-2019. Included patients were diagnosed with cleft alveolus, previous BMP-2 exposure and required revision bone grafting during mixed dentition for persistent alveolar defects. 17 patients underwent revision alveolar bone grafting (ABG) with either DBX (n = 10) or autograft (n = 7) to repair persistent bony cleft. The primary study outcome measured was alveolar bone graft revision failure described as continued alveolar nonunion. The median age at revision ABG was 13.1 ± 3.3 years, with a mean follow-up time of 4.9 years (1.1-9.2 years). Patients were 53% male, 47% had a unilateral cleft lip and alveolus. 58.8% of patients were treated with DBX in the cleft, 41.2% treated with autograft from iliac crest. Overall, 11.8% (n = 2) of all revisions failed, requiring a second revision. The average time to reoperation was 2.06 years, and both were re-grafted with autograft. There was no statistically significant difference between the type of bone graft source used and the failure rate obtained (P = .1544). DBX and autologous iliac crest bone grafts achieve similar alveolar union rates during revision ABG in patients treated with previous BMP-2 to the alveolar cleft.

A Review of Orthodontic Considerations before and after Alveolar Bone Grafting in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate

A Review of Orthodontic Considerations before and after Alveolar Bone Grafting in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate

Erratum.

Figures 1 and 2 were inadvertently switched and printed with the wrong legends in “Does absence of maxillary lateral incisor affect the status of maxillary canine before and after secondary alveolar bone grafting in patients with unilateral alveolar cleft?,” by Hyunseung Hong, Il-Hyung Yang, Jin-Young Choi, Jong-Ho Lee, Jee Hyeok Chung, Sukwha Kim, and Seung-Hak Baek.Angle Orthod.2022;92:683– 690. These have been corrected in the online version.

Rapid maxillary expansion vs slow maxillary expansion in patients with cleft lip and/or palate: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

To compare the dentoalveolar outcomes of slow maxillary expansion (SME) and rapid maxillary expansion (RME) used for maxillary expansion before secondary alveolar bone grafting in patients with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P). Secondarily, the advantages and disadvantages of SME vs RME were reviewed. A systematic search was conducted up to November 2021, including Medline (via PubMed), Embase (via Ovid), Web of Science, Cochrane Central, and Google Scholar. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. Risk-of-bias assessment was performed using the Risk of Bias (RoB 2.0) and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS I) tool. Overall quality was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tool. Of 4007 records, five studies met the inclusion criteria. The randomized control trial (RCT) had a low risk of bias, the non-RCTs presented with a moderate risk of bias. Arch width and perimeter increased significantly with both SME and RME treatments. No difference in the increase in palatal depth was found. The meta-analysis showed a greater anterior-to-posterior expansion ratio for the Quad Helix (QH) appliance. The results for dental tipping were not conclusive. SME and RME promote equal posterior expansion in cleft patients. The anterior differential expansion is greater with SME (QH appliance). No clear evidence exists concerning the amount of dental adverse effects of SME and RME in cleft patients.

Does absence of maxillary lateral incisor affect the status of maxillary canine before and after secondary alveolar bone grafting in patients with unilateral alveolar cleft?

ABSTRACT Objectives To investigate whether absence of maxillary lateral incisor (MXLI) would affect the status of maxillary canine (MXC) before and after secondary alveolar bone grafting (SABG) in patients with unilateral cleft lip and alveolus (UCLA) and unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). Materials and Methods 47 male patients with UCLA and UCLP, whose Bergland indices were type I or II after SABG, were divided into the MXLI-absence (n = 26) and MXLI-presence groups (n = 21). Using panoramic radiographs, the position, angulation, and development status of MXC on the cleft side, and the cleft width before SABG (T1) were evaluated. After full eruption of the permanent dentition (T2), the root length, root shape, and frequency of forced eruption of MXC on the cleft side were investigated. Then, statistical analysis was performed. Results Compared to the MXLI-presence group, the MXLI-absence group showed higher frequencies of mesial angulation of MXC at T1 (criteria: &amp;gt;25°; 46.2% vs 14.3%, P &amp;lt; .05) and dilaceration of MXC at T2 (26.9% vs 4.8%, P &amp;lt; .001). MXC on the cleft side showed positive correlations between horizontal position at T1 and forced eruption at T2, and between vertical position and mesial angulation at T1 and dilaceration at T2 (all P &amp;lt; .01). Conclusions In patients with UCLA and UCLP whose SABG outcome was successful, absence of MXLI on the cleft side increased only the frequencies of mesial angulation of MXC at T1 and dilaceration of MXC at T2, not frequency of forced eruption at T2.

Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate: A Step-by-Step Video Series.

Secondary alveolar bone grafting is one of the key surgical procedures performed to restore dental arch continuity and facilitate tooth eruption in patients with cleft lip and palate. Harvest of cancellous bone graft from the iliac crest has become the gold standard; however. there is no consensus regarding the ideal technique. An optimal bone harvest technique must be aimed at producing minimal donor-site morbidity and patient discomfort. The success of the bone grafting procedure depends largely on the surgical technique. To restore cleft alveolar defects, one must be able to conceptualize the different underlying aspects of the problem to perform an effective surgical repair. It is important for surgeons-in-service to adopt newer techniques that significantly enhance the overall outcome. This article describes two techniques of iliac bone harvest and the principles involved in execution of the alveolar bone grafting procedure. The accompanying four-part video series depicts the bone harvest, flap design, dissection of the recipient cleft alveolus, and bone grafting in a step-by-step manner.

Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting in Patients with Unilateral and Bilateral Complete Cleft Lip and Palate: A Single-Institution Outcomes Evaluation Using Three-Dimensional Cone Beam Computed Tomography.

Secondary alveolar bone grafting of autologous bone from the iliac crest is a widely accepted modality for repair of residual alveolar cleft in patients with mixed dentition with previously repaired complete cleft lip and palate. There remains debate regarding surgical timing and preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative management of these cases. This retrospective study reviewed patient demographic information in addition to preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative course to evaluate how patient and practice factors impact graft outcomes as assessed by three-dimensional cone beam computed tomographic evaluation at the 6-month postoperative visit. On univariate analysis, age at operation older than 9 years, history of oronasal fistula, history of cleft lip or palate revision, and history of international adoption were all found to significantly increase likelihood of graft failure (p < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, age older than 9 years was found to be the single most significant predictor of graft failure (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in graft outcomes between patients with unilateral or bilateral cleft lip and palate, and no single variable was found to significantly correlate to increased complication rates. The graft success rate overall of the authors' practice was 86.2 percent, with a complication rate of 7.7 percent. Secondary alveolar bone grafting is an integral part of the cleft lip and palate surgical treatment series; this study identified several outcome predictors for both graft failure and adverse events, the most significant of which was age at operation. Although the mixed dentition phase often extends to 12 years of age, it is recommended that bone grafting be performed before 9 years of age to optimize outcomes. Risk, III.

Extensive Gingivoperiosteoplasty Versus Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting in Patients With Complete Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate During the Mixed Dentition Period: A Retrospective Outcome Analysis.

The concept of gingivoperiosteoplasty (GPP) in the mixed dentition stage as compared with secondary alveolar bone grafting (ABG) in management of alveolar cleft has not been much discussed upon. The authors present the experience with extensive GPP and ABG in the mixed dentition stage in complete bilateral alveolar cleft cases. A retrospective review of nonsyndromic patients with complete bilateral alveolar cleft operated on with either GPP or ABG (iliac crest) in the mixed dentition stage with at least 1-year follow-up was performed. Dental occlusal radiographs were evaluated for level of bone gain using Bergland and Witherow scales. Statistical evaluation of clinical success and procedure-related complications was conducted using χ2 test and odds ratio. Twenty-four patients in the GPP group and 20 in the ABG group were comparatively studied. Clinical success rate as indicated by Bergland scales I and II (87.5% in GPP vs 82.5% in ABG; P = 0.731), complication rate (20.83% in GPP vs 30% in ABG; P = 0.484), and status of canine eruption showed no significant differences in clinical outcomes in both groups. The technique of extensive GPP as described by authors shows equal efficacy to secondary ABG for management of bilateral alveolar clefts during the mixed dentition period.

A CBCT Based Assessment of Canine Eruption and Development Following Alveolar Bone Grafting in Patients Born With Unilateral Cleft lip and/or Palate.

To three-dimensionally assess and visualize the eruption path and development of the maxillary canine following alveolar bone grafting in patients born with cleft lip and palate. A further objective of this analysis was to assess how the presence of the lateral incisor impacts the eruption path of the canine. Observational follow-up study. Stockholm Craniofacial Team, Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden. Thirty children born with non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip with or without palate were consecutively included. CBCT scans of the maxilla were taken six months before and six months after the alveolar bone-grafting surgery for each patient. Canine eruption (angulation and vertical movement) and canine development (length and volume). There was a significant difference pre- and post-operatively of the canine angulation between the cleft and non-cleft sides. The mean angulation on the cleft side was 14.7° (SD = 11.1°) while on the non-cleft side, it was 4.9° (SD = 9.2°). No significant differences were noted between cleft-side and non-cleft side canines in terms of amount of vertical eruption and volumetric development. Absence of the lateral incisor did not significantly contribute to either canine angulation or its vertical eruption on the cleft-side. Higher angulation of the canine on the cleft side indicates a higher risk of future canine impaction. Presence or absence of the lateral incisor did not significantly affect canine angulation or its vertical eruption. Increased age and children born with total cleft lip and palate imply a higher risk of angulated canines on the cleft side.

Progressive Comparison of Density Assessment of Alveolar Bone Graft in Patients with Unilateral and Bilateral Cleft.

(1) Background: Continuing to observe the grafted bone mineral density (BMD) is essential to ensure the success of alveolar bone grafting (ABG) in patients with cleft lip and palate. This study elaborates on three methods that can be used to evaluate the progressive BMD. (2) Methods: Forty patients with unilateral or bilateral clefts receiving ABG were enrolled. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were taken at 6 months (T1) and 2 years (T2) postoperatively. In CBCT, measurements were obtained on three different planes using the circle located 1 mm from the adjacent teeth (Method A), the largest circle within the defect (Method B), or the central circle with a diameter of 2 mm (Method C). The BMD was the average density of the three planes and was adjusted by pogonion density. Bland–Altman plots were used to evaluate the agreement of each method. Inter-rater reliability was confirmed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). (3) Results: For Method A, B, and C, the mean-adjusted BMD (BMD/pogonion density, BMDa) was 17.44%, 17.88%, and 17.69%, respectively, at T1 (p = 0.495), and 22.51%, 22.87%, and 22.74%, respectively, at T2 (p = 0.690); the density enhancement rates were 40.54%, 38.92%, and 43.15% (p = 0.382). Significant differences between the BMDa at T1 and T2 were observed (p < 0.001, <0.001, and 0.001, for Method A, B, and C, respectively). The volume of the grafted tissue remained stable during T1 and T2, and no significant correlation between density enhancement rate and volume loss was observed. (4) Conclusions: A significant increase in the BMD of grafted tissue was observed in the 2-year postoperative follow-up. The three methods for measuring BMDa via CBCT can be applied in post-ABG evaluations.

Long-Term Stability of Alveolar Bone Graft in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Alveolar bone grafts are the golden standard in treating patients with oral cleft and hence, the long-term success of this treatment is the subject of many studies. The aim of this study was to systematically review literature that examined the long-term stability of alveolar bone grafting in patients with cleft lip and palate. In this study, data was collected via a comprehensive search of random and nonrandom studies evaluating the success of bone grafts in patients with cleft lip and palate in ISI Web of Science, EMBASE, Scopus, Medline, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from the beginning until July 3, 2020. Also, a search was conducted for ongoing studies in the trial registry and a hand search of related gray literature and references of the relevant studies. The relevant data of the included studies were extracted using predefined extraction forms. Meta-analysis was performed using inverse-variance for calculating the pooled outcome of outcome measures. The pooled mean success rate of alveolar bone graft and mean difference of cleft volume after 1 year was presented as the outcome of the analysis. Eight studies (1 randomized clinical trial study and 7 controlled prospective studies) were included in this meta-analysis. The results of the analyses showed that the total percentage of secondary alveolar success in the follow-up period of at least 1 year according to the Bergland index was 76.52% (pooled success = 76.52%, 44.92-98.10). Also, bone defect in the cleft area reduced significantly after bone grafting (MD = 0.62 cm3, 0.48-0.75, P < 0.00001). The total percentage of bone filling after 1 year and according to CBCT (cone beam computed tomography) was about 63.38%, and the rate of definite natural eruption of canine within the graft was 80.89%. The total success rate of secondary alveolar bone grafting in the follow-up period of at least 1 year was clinically significant and alveolar bone grafting significantly reduced bone defect volume. Also, there was no difference in the amount of bone remaining after 1 year in patients whose canine had erupted through the grafted bone and in those whose canine had not erupted.