Alternative Routes Of Insulin Administration Research Articles

The promising future of insulin therapy in diabetes mellitus.

The first therapeutic use of insulin by Frederick Banting and Charles Best in 1921 revolutionized the management of type 1 diabetes and considerably changed the lives of many patients with other types of diabetes. In the past 100 years, significant pharmacological advances took place in the field of insulin therapy, bringing closer the goal of optimal glycemic control along with decreased diabetes-related complications. Despite these developments, several challenges remain, such as increasing treatment flexibility, reducing iatrogenic hypoglycemia, and optimizing patient quality of life. Ongoing innovations in insulin therapy (e.g., new insulin analogs, alternative routes of insulin administration, and closed-loop technology) endeavor to overcome these hurdles and change the landscape of diabetes mellitus management. This report highlights recent advances made in the field of insulin therapy and discusses future perspectives.

Insulin-delivery methods for children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes

Efforts directed toward restoring normal metabolic levels by mimicking the physiological insulin secretion, thereby ensuring safety, efficacy, minimal invasiveness and conveniences, are of great significance in the management of type 1 diabetes among children and adolescents. Regardless of the various technologies being discovered in addressing invasiveness and enhancing medication adherence in the management of type 1 diabetes, yet limited success had been observed among children and adolescents. The multiple daily subcutaneous insulin injections route using vial and syringe, and occasionally insulin pens, remain the most predictable route for insulin administration among children and adolescents. However, this route has been associated with compromised patient compliance, fear of injections and unacceptability, resulting in poor glycemic control, which promote the demand for alternative routes of insulin administration. Alternative routes for delivering insulin are being investigated in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes; these include the hybrid closed-loop ‘artificial pancreas’ system, oral, inhalation, intranasal routes, and others. This review article explores the current advances in insulin-delivery methods that address the needs of children and adolescents in the treatment of type 1 diabetes.

Nanotechnology in Insulin Delivery for Management of Diabetes.

Diabetes is a group of diseases characterized by hyperglycemia and originating from the deficiency or resistance to insulin, or both. Ultimately, the most effective treatment for patients with diabetes involves subcutaneous injections of insulin. However, this route of administration is often painful and inconvenient, as most patients will have to selfadminister it at least twice a day for the rest of their lives. Also, infection, insulin precipitation, and either lipoatrophy or lipohypertrophy are frequently observed at the site of injection. To date, several alternative routes of insulin administration have been explored, including nasal, pulmonary and oral. Although the delivery of insulin is an ideal route for diabetic patients, several limitations have to be overcome such as the rapid degradation of insulin in gastric fluid and low oral bioavailability. Numerous strategies have been carried out to improve these limited parameters such as the use of enzyme inhibitors, absorption enhancers, mucoadhesive polymers and chemical modification for receptor-mediated absorption. Also, insulin-loaded nanocarriers bypass several physiological barriers. This current review focuses on the various barriers existing in the delivery of insulin through the oral route and the strategies undertaken so far to overcome those obstacles using nanocarriers as a potential vehicle of insulin.

Cardioprotective effects of pectin-insulin patch in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats.

Cardiovascular complications are among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in diabetes mellitus. Despite the beneficial effects of subcutaneous insulin, reports suggest that the therapy itself precipitates cardiovascular risks due to the high insulin concentration administered. It is therefore necessary to seek alternative routes of insulin administration that may bypass the undesirable effects associated with high plasma insulin concentrations. Accordingly, the present study investigated the effects of a novel transdermal pectin-insulin patch on selected markers of cardiovascular function in diabetes. Pectin-insulin matrix patches (20.0, 40.8, and 82.9 μg/kg) were prepared as described previously. The three formulations were applied to streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats thrice daily. Blood glucose concentrations and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were monitored weekly for 5 weeks. Rats were then killed and blood collected for analysis of the lipid profile, cardiotropin-1, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP). The patches decreased blood glucose concentrations and diabetes-induced disturbances in lipid profile were attenuated by patch application (82.9 μg/kg). The diabetes-induced increase in MAP was also attenuated in patch (82.9 μg/kg)-treated rats. Patch treatment resulted in a decreased heart weight: body weight ratio, as well as reductions in cardiotropin-1, TNF-α, and hsCRP concentrations. Application of the pectin-insulin patch protects against the debilitating cardiovascular effects associated with conventional diabetes treatment. This suggests that the pectin-insulin patch may provide an effective alternative therapeutic approach to the commonly used subcutaneous insulin injections in the management of diabetes.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Properties of a Novel Inhaled Insulin.

Advances in insulin treatment options over recent decades have markedly improved the management of diabetes. Despite this, glycemic control remains suboptimal in many people with diabetes. Although postprandial glucose control has been improved with the development of subcutaneously injected rapid-acting insulin analogs, currently available insulins are not able to fully mimic the physiological time-action profile of endogenously secreted insulin after a meal. The delayed onset of metabolic action and prolonged period of effect induce the risk of postprandial hyperglycemia and late postprandial hypoglycemia. A number of alternative routes of insulin administration have been investigated over time in an attempt to overcome the limitations associated with subcutaneous administration and to provide an improved time-action insulin profile more closely simulating physiological prandial insulin release. Among these, pulmonary insulin delivery has shown the most promise. Technosphere® Inhaled Insulin (TI) is a rapid-acting inhaled human insulin recently approved by the FDA for prandial insulin therapy. In this article we discuss the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of TI, and, based on key studies performed during its clinical development, the implications for improved postprandial glucose control.

Insulin therapy - new directions of research.

Insulin therapy is the most effective method of lowering blood glucose. Over 100 years have passed the studies for the optimisation of insulin action. To date, subcutaneous insulin administration has been the basic route of insulin delivery. The search for insulin therapy is simultaneously conducted in the following directions: the optimisation of insulin action, automatisation, and the decrease in the invasiveness of insulin delivery methods. The optimisation of insulin action has led to the discovery of ultra-rapid-acting human insulin analogues, ultra-long-acting human insulin analogues, and biosimilar insulin. Automatisation referred to the "artificial pancreas" and closing the loop system in insulin pump therapy. The decrease in the invasiveness of insulin delivery methods is focused on alternative routes of insulin administration. (Endokrynol Pol 2016; 67 (3): 314-324).

Towards a Physiological Prandial Insulin Profile: Enhancement of Subcutaneously Injected Prandial Insulin Using Local Warming Devices

The need to develop an insulin delivery system that can closely mimic physiologically induced changes in prandial insulin release has been a major research target since the discovery of insulin. The challenges facing existing insulin delivery systems, related to relatively slow pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, have been further highlighted by rapid advances in diabetes technology and progress in artificial pancreas research. Despite the growing interest in alternative routes of insulin administration, the subcutaneous route remains—at least for now—the preferred route for insulin administration. In this article, we review efforts aimed at developing subcutaneously injected ultrafast-acting insulin and measures aimed at enhancing insulin absorption, focusing on local warming devices.

Emerging Trends in Noninvasive Insulin Delivery.

This paper deals with various aspects of oral insulin delivery system. Insulin is used for the treatment of diabetes mellitus, which is characterized by the elevated glucose level (above the normal range) in the blood stream, that is, hyperglycemia. Oral route of administration of any drug is the most convenient route. Development of oral insulin is still under research. Oral insulin will cause the avoidance of pain during the injection (in subcutaneous administration), anxiety due to needle, and infections which can be developed. Different types of enzyme inhibitors, like sodium cholate, camostat, mesilate, bacitracin, leupeptin, and so forth, have been used to prevent insulin from enzymatic degradation. Subcutaneous route has been used for administration of insulin, but pain and itching at the site of administration can occur. That is why various alternative routes of insulin administration like oral route are under investigation. In this paper authors summarized advancement in insulin delivery with their formulation aspects.

Oral insulin reloaded: a structured approach.

Optimal coverage of insulin needs is the paramount aim of insulin replacement therapy in patients with diabetes mellitus. To apply insulin without breaking the skin barrier by a needle and/or to allow a more physiological provision of insulin are the main reasons triggering the continuous search for alternative routes of insulin administration. Despite numerous attempts over the past 9 decades to develop an insulin pill, no insulin for oral dosing is commercially available. By way of a structured approach, we aim to provide a systematic update on the most recent developments toward an orally available insulin formulation with a clear focus on data from clinical-experimental and clinical studies. Thirteen companies that claim to be working on oral insulin formulations were identified. However, only 6 of these companies published new clinical trial results within the past 5 years. Interestingly, these clinical data reports make up a mere 4% of the considerably high total number of publications on the development of oral insulin formulations within this time period. While this picture clearly reflects the rising research interest in orally bioavailable insulin formulations, it also highlights the fact that the lion's share of research efforts is still allocated to the preclinical stages.

Doctor, stop needling me: an update on alternative routes of insulin administration

SUMMARY Since its introduction, insulin therapy for diabetes has long been equated with pain, anxiety, lifestyle inconvenience and potential injection-site irritation and lipodystrophy. Efforts to develop noninvasive methods for insulin delivery have relied on molecular modifications, absorption enhancers and encapsulation techniques to resist degradation, promote drug penetration and achieve therapeutic plasma insulin levels. Product development attempts have targeted virtually every mucosal membrane in the body for potential drug delivery. Each administration route has unique physiologic constraints. Potential alternative insulin therapies are discussed with their respective technical challenges. An overview of new drug-delivery platforms currently in development is also provided.

Buccal spray insulin (Oralgen) for type 2 diabetes: what evidence?

Introduction: The achievement of a good glycemic control and, in particular, the management of postprandial hyperglycemia represent the most significant treatment target for the management of diabetes. Multiple daily insulin injections are often still required to gain the treatment goals. Since the noncompliance with injected insulin therapy causes a slowdown in the process of glycemic compensation, novel non-injectable insulin formulations have been developed. Oral spray insulin (Oralgen) is a tasteless liquid formulation that provides insulin absorption via buccal mucosa.Areas covered: To elucidate the current status of Oralgen in type 2 diabetes patients, studies of pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic and clinical trials are reviewed.Expert opinion: The ‘psychological insulin resistance,' represented by the reluctance of both patients and health-care professionals to initiate insulin therapy, could be won by alternative routes of insulin administration, improving patients' compliance. In particular, Oralgen seems to be suitable to manage the postprandial hyperglycemia without hypoglycemic risk, although no comparative studies with rapid-acting insulin analogs and no randomized controlled trials in large cohort subjects with type 2 diabetes are available to date.

New ways of insulin delivery

New ways of insulin delivery

New ways of insulin delivery

New ways of insulin delivery

New ways of insulin delivery

New ways of insulin delivery

Oral insulin and buccal insulin: a critical reappraisal.

Despite the availability of modern insulin injection devices with needles that are so sharp and thin that practically no injection pain takes place, it is still the dream of patients with diabetes to, for example, swallow a tablet with insulin. This is not associated with any pain and would allow more discretion. Therefore, availability of oral insulin would not only ease insulin therapy, it would certainly increase compliance. However, despite numerous attempts to develop such a "tablet" in the past 85 years, still no oral insulin is commercially available. Buccal insulin is currently in the last stages of clinical development by one company and might become available in the United States and Europe in the coming years (it is already on the market in some other countries). The aim of this review is to critically describe the different approaches that are currently under development. Optimal coverage of prandial insulin requirements is the aim with both routes of insulin administration (at least with most approaches). The speed of onset of metabolic effect seen with some oral insulin approaches is rapid, but absorption appears to be lower when the tablet is taken immediately prior to a meal. With all approaches, considerable amounts of insulin have to be applied in order to induce therapeutically relevant increases in the metabolic effect because of the low relative biopotency of buccal insulin. Unfortunately, the number of publications about clinical-experimental and clinical studies is surprisingly low. In addition, there is no study published in which the variability of the metabolic effect induced (with and without a meal) was studied adequately. In summary, after the failure of inhaled insulin, oral insulin and buccal insulin are hot candidates to come to the market as the next alternative routes of insulin administration.

Noninjectable methods of insulin administration

Optimal glycemic control is essential for the prevention of diabetes-related complications, and the intensive insulin regimens that best resemble physiological insulin secretion are most likely to attain it. However, there are many limitations that preclude the early use of insulin by patients with type 2 diabetes or wider implementation of the intensive regimens in type 1 diabetes. More acceptable alternative routes of insulin administration and effective, noninvasive, patient-friendly delivery systems that alleviate the burden of insulin injections have been researched over the years. To date, only pulmonary inhalation of insulin has become a feasible alternative; it has proved to be as effective and well tolerated as the subcutaneously injected regular insulin and it has a pharmacodynamic profile well suited for mealtime insulin therapy. Several pulmonary insulin delivery systems are in different stages of development, and one (Exubera, Nektar Therapeutics/Pfizer Inc.-Sanofi-Aventis Group) has already become clinically available in the United States and Europe for patients with diabetes. Other noninjectable methods of insulin administration are reviewed.

New strategies in insulin treatment: analogues and noninvasive routes of administration

Abstract Recent years have seen the development of alternatives to human insulin for the treatment of diabetes. Both rapid-acting and long-acting analogues are available. Alternative routes of insulin administration are emerging. The present review briefly summarizes the present knowledge on insulin analogues and alternative administration routes.

Waiting to inhale: noninjectable insulin, are we there yet?

Subcutaneous injection has been the only route of insulin administration for patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes for the past 80 years. Although research and development in this time has improved the insulin treatments themselves, it is only now that alternative routes of insulin administration are becoming viable. Many avenues of insulin administration have been explored, including oral, buccal, and pulmonary routes. However, these methods of noninvasive insulin delivery are not free from difficulties and only preliminary data are available for oral insulin pills and buccal insulin sprays. The most promising alternative route of delivery appears to be inhaled insulin and two devices are already in phase III testing. Nevertheless, inhaled insulin devices will still have to overcome some problems and recent studies show that these challenges are currently being confronted. It appears that years of research into noninvasive methods of insulin administration are close to fruition and this review outlines the most recent findings in this area.

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of inhaled insulin.

The benefits of intensive insulin therapy in the prevention of complications in patients with diabetes mellitus are now well established. However, the current methods of insulin administration fall well short of the ideal. Consequently, alternative routes of insulin administration have been investigated. The pulmonary route has received the most attention, helped by advances in inhaler devices and insulin formulation technology. As a result, several insulin inhalation systems are at varying stages of development, with one already filed for marketing approval in Europe. Knowledge of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of the various inhaled insulin formulations will help to determine their positioning in current and evolving diabetes treatment strategies. For instance, a rapid onset and short duration of action would be desirable for use in postprandial glucose control. Pharmacokinetic studies with inhaled insulin reveal that serum insulin concentrations peak earlier and decay more rapidly following inhalation compared with subcutaneously administered regular insulin, and pharmacodynamic studies measuring glucose infusion rate under euglycaemic glucose clamp show corresponding rapid changes in glucose control. Furthermore, intrapatient variability in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of inhaled insulin is low; variability is similar to (or perhaps less than) that seen when insulin is administered subcutaneously. Estimates of the bioavailability and bioefficacy achievable with the current inhalation systems are typically in the region of 10% of that experienced with subcutaneously administered insulin. Most of the losses are in the device, mouth and throat, with approximately 30-50% of the insulin deposited in the lungs being absorbed. Clinical experience to date indicates that inhaled insulin has the potential to be an effective treatment in patients with diabetes, and that it may have particular utility in the treatment of postprandial hyperglycaemia.