You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Basic Research1 Apr 2011607 A FUNCTIONAL VARIANT IN NKX3.1 ASSOCIATED WITH PROSTATE CANCER SUSCEPTIBILITY DOWN-REGULATES NKX3.1 EXPRESSION Shusuke Akamatsu, Ryo Takata, Michiaki Kubo, Naoyuki Kamatani, Tomoaki Fujioka, Osamu Ogawa, Yusuke Nakamura, and Hidewaki Nakagawa Shusuke AkamatsuShusuke Akamatsu Kyoto, Japan More articles by this author , Ryo TakataRyo Takata Morioka, Japan More articles by this author , Michiaki KuboMichiaki Kubo Yokohama, Japan More articles by this author , Naoyuki KamataniNaoyuki Kamatani Yokohama, Japan More articles by this author , Tomoaki FujiokaTomoaki Fujioka Morioka, Japan More articles by this author , Osamu OgawaOsamu Ogawa Kyoto, Japan More articles by this author , Yusuke NakamuraYusuke Nakamura Tokyo, Japan More articles by this author , and Hidewaki NakagawaHidewaki Nakagawa Yokohama, Japan More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.1460AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) identified multiple susceptible loci for prostate cancer (PC), and recent GWAS implicated that a common variant rs1512268 on chromosome 8p21 is associated with PC susceptibility, which is located at 14kb downstream of a prostate tumor suppressor gene NKX3.1. In the present study, we aimed to identify functional or causative variants in this region conferring PC susceptibility. METHODS To identify candidates of functional or causative variants, we performed re-sequencing and fine mapping of this region. The variants in the 3′UTR of NKX3.1 were further screened by RNA stability assay. The variants in the intron, the 5′UTR or the upstream of NKX3.1 were screened by electrophoretic mobility shift assay. The differences in the binding affinity to nuclear proteins between the alleles were confirmed by competition assays, and the nuclear protein that binds to this region was determined by supershift assays. The association between the alleles and transcriptional activities were assessed by reporter assays. NKX3.1 expression in relation to the alleles were examined in vivo by quantative real time PCR and allele specific transcript quantification assays using cDNA from normal prostate tissues. RESULTS We identified 12 candidates of causative SNPs that were absolutely linked with each otherby re-sequencing and fine mapping of this region. Screening of these variants by RNA stability assay, electrophoretic mobility shift assay, and reporter assay indicated that rs11781886 in the 5′UTR of NKX3.1 displayed different binding affinity to nuclear proteins between the alleles, and that the transcriptional activity of the NKX3.1 promoter was significantly lower in the susceptible allele of this SNP. Sp1 was determined to be the transcription factor that binds to the susceptible G allele, but not to the non-susceptible A allele. Allele-specific transcript quantification and quantitative PCR analyses showed that the expression of NKX3.1 transcript in the prostate was significantly lower in the subjects with the haplotype carrying the susceptible variant at rs11781886. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that the functional variant rs11781886 in the 5′UTR of NKX3.1 can affect its transcription by altering the binding affinity of a transcriptional factor Sp1, and results in PC susceptibility by lowering expression of NKX3.1 transcript in the prostate. © 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 185Issue 4SApril 2011Page: e244-e245 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Shusuke Akamatsu Kyoto, Japan More articles by this author Ryo Takata Morioka, Japan More articles by this author Michiaki Kubo Yokohama, Japan More articles by this author Naoyuki Kamatani Yokohama, Japan More articles by this author Tomoaki Fujioka Morioka, Japan More articles by this author Osamu Ogawa Kyoto, Japan More articles by this author Yusuke Nakamura Tokyo, Japan More articles by this author Hidewaki Nakagawa Yokohama, Japan More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract