All-inside Technique Research Articles

Functional Outcomes in ACL Reconstruction: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing All-Inside and Transportal Techniques.

The two techniques to fix a torn ACL are the Transportal and All-Inside Techniques. However, the argument about which method is better for functional outcomes keeps going on. The aim was to look at how well these two treatments worked and their effects. We hypothesized that All-Inside and Transportal ACL reconstruction procedures would yield similar functional results. The study included 45 patients with ACL insufficiency from AIIMS, Raipur, India. Half of each ACL approach was represented by 22 AI and 23 TP participants, randomly assigned to each group. Preoperative and post-operative VAS, IKDC, and range of motion were determined at 1, 3, and 6 months. The study used IBM SPSS v20 for Data Analysis, comparing two groups using a t-test. P < 0.05 was fixed for Statistical significance. The study was dominated by young males (86.7%, 18-30 years), mainly students (44.4%). Comparable IKDC scores over time (P = 0.628); significant VAS score difference (P = 0.001). A similar movement range (P = 0.153) was observed. AI group had slightly smaller grafts (non-significant, P = 0.235). Similar Lachmann Grade distributions pre- and post-surgery; no significant post-operative complication in either group. When comparing the methods' functionalities, no statistically significant gaps emerged. All-Inside approach preserves bone and gracilis tendon, reduces post-operative pain, and strengthens knee flexors. Although, early rehabilitation favors all inside, both methods are equally effective over time. In comparison to the traditional Transportal Technique, All Inside has a greater learning curve and costs more.

Comparison of a full tibial tunnel or an all-inside technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: An observational study.

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction performed with either a full tibial tunnel technique or an all-inside technique. Data from patients with ACL rupture who underwent ACL reconstruction using autogenous hamstring tendon grafts between January 2019 and July 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 24 months. Preoperative and postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee scores, Lysholm knee scores, visual analog scale pain scores, Tegner activity scale scores, C-reactive protein levels, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, white blood cell (WBC) count, D-dimer levels, and neutrophils were recorded. At the final follow-up, side-to-side differences were assessed with the pivot shift test, Lachman test, anterior drawer test, and a knee laxity-testing device. This study included 135 patients with ACL rupture, with 62 patients (43 males and 19 females, mean age: 34.42 ± 12.79 years) undergoing the full tibial tunnel technique, and 73 patients (58 males and 15 females, mean age: 32.41 ± 11.01 years) undergoing the all-inside techniques (AITs). There were no significant differences in postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee scores, Lysholm knee scores, or Tegner activity scale scores, except at postoperative 6 months. visual analog scale pain scores showed significant improvement in patients that underwent the AIT compared to the full tibial tunnel technique at postoperative 1 week, 2 weeks, and 1 month; however, there were no significant differences at postoperative 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. C-reactive protein levels, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, WBC count, D-dimer levels, and neutrophils were significantly lower in patients that underwent the AIT compared to the full tibial tunnel technique at postoperative 1 month, but there were no other significant differences in these outcome measures, except for WBC count at postoperative 3 months. There was no significant difference in knee stability at the last follow-up. In ACL reconstruction, functional outcomes following the AIT are satisfactory and similar to the total tibial tunnel technique, but patients experience less pain and a reduced early postoperative inflammatory response. These results highlight the promising potential of AITs in the clinical management of ACL rupture and advocate for their widespread adoption.

All-inside Technique versus Conventional Full-tunnel Reconstruction for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears of the Knee: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Introduction: There is a paucity of evidence in literature regarding the efficacy of all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (AIACLR) vis-à-vis the traditionally used full-tunnel (FT) technique. The primary aim of this review, thus, was to shed light on this discrepancy and determine which of the two methods had more optimum results. Methods: PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched by two independent reviewers. Selection criteria were laid down as per the patient, intervention, control, and outcome (PICO) format. All included studies were checked for quality and methodological strength using well-defined risk-of-bias assessment tools. Techniques were compared with respect to their graft and tunnel dimensions, functional outcome scores, and complication rates. Data analysis was carried out using the RevMan 5.3® software. Results: A total of 12 articles (six randomized control trials or randomized clinical trials and six prospective/retrospective cohort studies) with 880 knees were included in this study. In most instances of AIACLR, a short and thick quadrupled semitendinosus graft was used for reconstruction. Suspensory fixation devices alone or in combination with interference screws were used for graft fixation. The two techniques were comparable in terms of their functional outcomes, with a slightly lower graft failure rate with AIACLR. Conclusion: The AI technique provides a safe and reliable alternative to conventional ACLR in terms of comparable functional results, reduced postoperative pain, and lower graft failure rates. However, more comparative trials with long-term follow-ups are needed before a definitive statement can be put forward.

Failure and complication rates following meniscal all-inside and inside-out repairs: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

This study examines failure rates, complication rates and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for meniscal all-inside (AI) and inside-out (IO) repair techniques. A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Embase and Cochrane (inception to January 2024) assessing for Level I-III studies evaluating outcomes after meniscal repair. The primary outcome regarded differences in failure rates between AI and IO repair techniques. Secondary outcomes included a comparison of complication rates and PROMs. Quality assessment was performed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation and Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria. A meta-analysis was conducted for outcomes reported by more than three comparative studies. A total of 24 studies (13 studies and 912 menisci for AI vs. 17 studies and 1,117 menisci for IO) were included. The mean follow-up ranges were 22-192 months (AI) and 18.5-155 months (IO). The overall reported AI failure rate ranged from 5% to 35% compared to 0% to 25% within the IO group. When comparing meniscal repair failure rates in the setting of concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, the AI group had a failure rate (AI: 5%-34%; IO: 0%-12.9%). The complication rate ranged from 0% to 40% for AI and 0% to 20.5% for IO. Post-operative PROM scores ranged from 81.2 to 93.8 (AI) versus 89.6 to 94 (IO) for IKDC and 4.0-7.02 (AI) versus 4.0-8.0 (IO) for Tegner. Upon pooling of six comparative studies, a significantly lower failure rate favouring the IO technique was observed (15.9% AI vs. 11.1% IO; p = 0.02), although this result was influenced by a study with a predominantly elite athlete population. Moreover, no significant differences were found regarding complication rates between cohorts (7.3% AI vs. 4.8% IO; p = 0.86). The present study underscores comparable clinical success between AI and IO meniscal repair techniques, with both techniques demonstrating similar complication rates. However, the AI repair technique was associated with 1.77 times higher odds of failure compared to the IO cohort. Level III.

Remnant Preservation Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Modified All-Inside Technique With Appendiceal Tibial Tunnel

The number of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures treated arthroscopically has increased. In most cases, the rupture of the ligament occurs in the femoral attachment, leaving a robust stump attached to the tibia. ACL reconstruction with stump preservation might have some advantages: rapid reinnervation and revascularization of the graft. Most techniques have used an interference screw in tibial fixation, which could be more difficult to achieve the graft diameter within 8 to 10 mm in most situations. Therefore, we describe a technique for modified “all-inside” ACL reconstruction with remnant preservation using an appendiceal tibial tunnel to optimize the graft size. After tunnel drilling in anatomic positions, the ACL stump is bored centrally up to the diameter of the graft to be passed. After passing the graft from the tibial tunnel to the remnant to the femoral tunnel, adjustable loops are used to fix the femoral side and the tibial side by an appendiceal tibial tunnel.

Retrospective cohort study comparing postoperative joint stability between all-inside PCL reconstruction technique and conventional PCL reconstruction technique in patients with multiligament knee injury

ObjectivesThe purpose of our study was to compare (1) posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) laxity, (2) patient-reported outcome, and (3) complications after the all-inside PCL reconstruction (Al-PCLR) technique and conventional PCLR (CON-PCLR) technique at minimum 2-year follow-up. We hypothesized that AI-PCLR and CONV-PCLR would yield similar results in PCL laxity, patient-reported outcomes, and complications. MethodA retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients who underwent PCLR with the Al-PCLR technique and CON-PCLR technique from 2012 to 2023 in a single hospital. Medical records were reviewed for patients’ demographic data, the technique of PCL reconstruction and complications. Patient-reported outcome scores, including International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Tegner activity scale, and Lysholm score, as well as bilateral kneeling radiographs and physical examinations, were collected at least 2 years postoperatively. ResultsIncluded in the study were 24 patients: 11 who underwent the CON-PCLR technique (mean age 40.7 +years) and 13 who underwent Al-PCLR (mean age 34.3 + 12.9 years). Three patients in AI-PCLR group were lost to follow-up and one patient is the CON-PCLR group, a revision case, was excluded from the study.Bilateral stress kneeling radiographs showed a similar side-to-side difference between two groups (CON-PCLR vs AL-PCLR: mean 7.5 ± 5.2 vs 5.8 ± 4.8 mm; P = 0.38) There were no statically significant differences between the two groups in postoperative IKDC (CON-PCLR vs AL-PCLR: 68.9 vs 73.9; P = 0.37), Lysholm (89.1 vs 94.1; P = 0.42), or Tegner activity (6 vs 6.4; P = 0.68) scores. ConclusionAll-inside PCLR demonstrates comparable stability to Conventional PCLR, with satisfactory patient-report outcome at minimum 2 years follow up and low rate of complications in patients with multiligament knee injury.Level of evidence: III Retrospective comparative study.

Continuous suture all-inside meniscal repair technique produces excellent functional outcomes and return to play rates with a low rate of failure.

The all-inside technique is now the most established treatment for meniscal repair, this usually involves a suture-based repair utilising interrupted sutures. A similar technique using continuous sutures can also be used; however there are no studies in the literature appraising this technique. This study aims to review outcomes for patients undergoing meniscal repair using a continuous suture all-inside technique. We reviewed patients undergoing meniscal repair using a continuous suture all-inside technique over a 5year period. We recorded demographic details, injury type, surgical procedure, incidence of reoperation, functional outcomes (Tegner-Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score) return to sport and failure of repair. Data were collected for 37 patients. Mean age was 25.8years, 81%, were male, median time to theatre was 169days, mean follow-up time was 2.9years. Concurrent ACL ruptures were present in 57%, all underwent ACL reconstruction in the same sitting. The mean Tegner-Lysholm score was 89. Mean IKDC score was 90.2. 78% were able to return to sport. Overall failure rate was 10.81%. Increasing age was associated with a decreased IKDC score (p = 0.02). Tegner-Lysholm score was significantly greater in patients with concurrent ACL injuries (p = 0.03) and patients with lateral meniscal tears (p = 0.04). In the first study to review outcomes following continuous all-inside suture-based meniscal repair we demonstrate excellent clinical outcomes with IKDC, Tegner-Lysholm, return to play and failure rates comparable to other commonly used techniques. We conclude that this is an acceptable and cost-effective technique.

All-Inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Full-Thickness All-Soft-Tissue Quadriceps Tendon Autograft With Independent Suture Tape Augmentation

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is the most frequently injured knee ligament that requires surgical intervention. Surgical options to address ACL ruptures include reconstruction using autograft or allograft or performing primary repair. Subsequent ACL graft failure is a significant postoperative concern in the younger patient population. The addition of suture tape to the final construct is thought to protect the graft during moments of high stress by increasing graft stiffness under high load and preventing substantial graft elongation. Given the normal anatomic lengthening of the ACL from knee flexion to full extension, final fixation of both the suture tape and the graft is done with the knee hyperextended to avoid overconstraint. The use of adjustable loop fixation for both femoral and tibial fixation with the all-inside technique allows the graft to be retensioned after final suture tape fixation and subsequent knee cycling. This ensures that the suture tape is slightly laxer than the graft so that the graft experiences loads that are essential for its healing, with the suture tape sharing the load only during times of high stress.

A Simplified Technique for All-Inside Tibial Socket Retrograde Drill Guiding Using a 2- to 3.5-mm Concentric Cannula Without the All-Inside Tibial Guide Ring

The all-inside anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) technique is a minimally invasive surgical procedure that has gained popularity due to its reduced invasiveness and improved patient outcomes. The establishment of tibial sockets remains a crucial step in ACL reconstruction, which has always been difficult in ACL reconstruction research. For doctors who are not very experienced, this technique of positioning and making sockets requires a special guide ring, and the tunnel entrance is prone to be anterior. Herein, we report a simplified technique using a self-made 2- to 3.5-mm concentric cannula to help surgeons easily master the all-inside technique. Our technique for tibial socket construction does not require the specific tibial guiding ring but uses a traditional tibial guiding ring for full-length tibial tunnel construction. With a 2-mm Kirschner wire and the traditional tibial guiding ring initially locating the tunnel position, the self-made concentric cannula helps combine the Kirschner wire with the guide pin sleeve, thereby impacting the guide pin sleeve into the tibial cortex at a controlled depth. Then, retrograde drilling is performed to create the socket. This technique provides feasible approaches for surgeons to transition from traditional full-long tunnel creation to the semi-long socket construction for the all-inside ACL technique.

Poster 307: Meniscal Repair in the Setting of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: 6-Year Follow up Results from the MARS Cohort

Objectives: Meniscal preservation has been demonstrated to contribute to long term knee health and has been a successful intervention in the isolated and ACL reconstructed patient. The long-term results of meniscus repair in the setting of revision ACL reconstruction have yet to be documented. The purpose of this study is to report the incidence of meniscal repair failures at 6-year follow-up in a cohort of patients who underwent concurrent revision ACL reconstruction and meniscal repair. Methods: All revision ACL reconstructions with concomitant meniscal repair cases from a multicenter group between 2006 and 2011 were selected. Six-year follow-up was obtained by both phone and email to determine whether any subsequent surgery had occurred to either knee since their initial revision ACL reconstruction. If so, operative reports were obtained, whenever possible, to verify pathologic condition and treatment. Results: In total, 221 patients from 1234 revision ACL reconstructions underwent concurrent meniscal repairs (18% of the cohort). There were 238 repairs performed: 173 medial and 65 lateral. The vast majority of these repairs (n=181; 76%) were performed with an all-inside technique. Baseline patient and surgical characteristics of this group are reported (Tables 1, 2). Six-year surgical follow-up was obtained on 77% (171/221) of the cohort. Overall, the meniscal repair failure rate defined as reoperation was 13% (31/235) at 6 years. Of the 31 failures, 28 were medial (24 all-inside, 4 inside-out; 16% failure rate) and 3 were lateral (2 all-inside, 1 inside-out; 4.6% failure rate; Table 2). Three medial failures were treated in conjunction with a subsequent repeat revision reconstruction. The mean (SD) time to failure for the medial repairs was 2.6 (1.7) years, while the time to failure for the lateral repairs was 1.6 (1.8) years. Medial tears underwent reoperation for failure at a statistically significant higher rate than lateral tears (16% versus 4.6%; p&lt;0.001). Conclusions: Meniscus repair in the revision ACL setting is a successful treatment option when clinically indicated with low failure rates. At 6-year follow-up, overall meniscal failure rate as defined by reoperation was 13% in this revision cohort. Failure rates for medial tears (16%) were higher than for lateral tears (4.6%), which aligns with previous studies both in the revision and primary setting.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Augmentation With Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate, Demineralized Bone Matrix, and Suture Tape Shows No Difference in Outcomes—But Faster Functional Recovery—Versus Non-augmented Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

PurposeTo compare outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), demineralized bone matrix (DBM), and suture tape augmentation (STA) vs. ACLR without biologic augmentation or STA. MethodsA prospective randomized controlled trial at a single institution was performed to compare ACLR with BMAC, DBM, and STA (Group A) vs. ACLR without biologic or STA (Group NA). One hundred patients were required. Skeletally mature patients <25 years old received quadriceps tendon autografts, while patients ≥25 years old received allograft ACLR with an all-inside technique. Concomitant meniscal pathologies were included. Primary outcomes compared were range-of-motion (ROM), limb symmetry, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Secondary outcomes included radiographic outcomes and surgical complications. Univariate and mixed-model regression analysis were used to compare outcomes. ResultsFifty-nine patients were included (Group A: 29 patients, 11 females, 38%; Group NA: 30 patients, 15 females, 50%). Early range-of-motion at 6 weeks (125° vs 109° flexion, p<0.0001) and limb symmetry testing at 12 weeks (80.6 % vs. 36.7% [Delta 43.9%], p<0.001) were significantly improved in Group A. At two years, International Knee Documentation (IKDC) scores were similar (91.1 ± 12.7 vs. 85.3 ± 10.8, p=0.109). Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis and Outcome Score (KOOS) Quality of Life (QOL) scores were significantly enhanced in Group A (85.2 ± 20.9 vs. 72.1 ± 20.4, p=0.042). Twenty-two patients (12 Group A, 10 Group NA) underwent CT scans at 6-months to compare bone tunnel healing. Overall, the mean increase in bone tunnel diameter was significantly smaller in Group A vs. NA. No difference in graft re-ruptures or re-operations was observed. Seven of 59 patients (11.9%) underwent re-operation for stiffness (A: 3 (10%) vs. NA: 4 (13%), p=1.0). ConclusionThere were no differences in IKDC scores between groups at 2-year follow-up. Functional outcomes including early range-of-motion and limb symmetry were significantly improved in patients who received ACLR with BMAC, DBM, and STA. ACLRACLR.ACLR

Perspective on Clinical and Functional Outcomes of Arthroscopic All-Inside Meniscal Repair: Insights From a Lower Middle-Income Country.

Background Meniscal tears are a common injury in the adult population. With the advent of newer devices, the adoption of the all-inside repair technique has been expanding substantially because of its feasibility and reduced risk to surrounding neurovascular structures. This study was conducted in a lower middle-income country to assess the functional outcome of the arthroscopic all-inside technique and to identify the potential factors that may affect the functional outcome that will eventually influence the future management of these patients. Method This study is a retrospective case series conducted at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. Patients presenting to the outpatient clinics with meniscal tears who underwent arthroscopic all-inside repair from January 2015 to December 2021 were included in this study. The exclusion criteria included patients who had associated fractures and patients with meniscal tears greater than six months ago. Results A total of 29 patients underwent all-inside meniscal repair for meniscus tears. The mean age of our patients was 26.31 years (SD = 7.11 years), ranging from 17 years to 48 years. Of these patients, 26 were males and three were females, accounting for 89.7% and 10.3%, respectively. The most frequent mechanism of injury was twisting while playing sports, accounting for 51.7%, followed by falling while playing sports and road traffic accidents (RTAs), accounting for 13.8% and 20.7%, respectively. Of the 29 patients, 16 (55.2%) had lateral meniscal injuries, 10 (34.5%) were diagnosed with medial meniscus injuries, and three (10.3%) had injuries to both menisci. The most common type of tear that was observed in our sample size was bucket handle tears, which were found in 14 patients, accounting for a total of 48.3%, followed by complex tears in seven patients (24.1%). The majority of the patients, i.e., 19 out of 29 patients (65.5%), had an acute course of injury, i.e., less than six weeks. For the functional outcome, the Lysholm score was calculated at 12 months and was found to be excellent in 17 patients, good in six patients, and fair in six patients, accounting for 58.6%, 20.7%, and 20.7%, respectively. The mean Lysholm score was 90.03 ± 8.85 points. Of the 29 patients, 27 (93.2%) had no complaints at the regular 12-month follow-up, whereas one patient (3.4%) experienced rotatory instability and one patient (3.4%) experienced stiffness at the knee joint. None of the patients had to undergo a reoperation. The mean Lysholm score in the 25 patients who had an associated anterior cruciate ligament tear was 89.64 ± 9.442 points, whereas the four patients who had an isolated meniscal tear had a mean score of 92.50 ± 2.887 points, which was not significantly different (p-value = 0.831). Conclusion All-inside meniscal repair for treating meniscal tears has become the new treatment paradigm as it not only renders excellent functional outcomes with minimal complications but also prevents damage to the surrounding neurovasculature and the soft tissue envelope as it is a minimally invasive technique.

The Effect of Gracilis Tendon Preservation on Postoperative Knee Joint Stability and Muscle Strength in Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery.

The aim of our study is to evaluate preserving gracilis tendon in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) surgery and its effect to the flexion of the knee joint and tibial internal rotation strength and the stability of the knee. Patients who underwent primary single-bundle arthroscopic ACLR using all-inside technique and using hamstring tendon autograft were evaluated retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups as gracilis preserved (St) and gracilis harvested (StG) groups. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Knee-related quality of life (KOOS-QOL) score, ACL-Return to Sport after Injury scale score were used to evaluate as postoperative functional scores at last follow-up. Anterior tibial translation was evaluated using the KT-1000 device. Knee joint flexion, extension, and internal rotation strength were evaluated using isokinetic dynamometer. Dynamic balance performances were measured using the Biodex Balance System. There were 24 patients in the St group and 23 patients in the StG group. Demographic data and clinical results showed no significant difference. Anteroposterior movement of the tibia was found to be significantly higher in the StG group than in the St group in measurements at 89 and 134 N, respectively (p = 0.01 and <0.001). No statistically significant difference was found between both standard and deep flexor and extensor and internal rotator strength. No statistically significant difference was found in the amount of total, anteroposterior, and mediolateral balance deficit between the two groups. Additional gracilis harvesting does not have a negative effect on both standard and deep knee flexion, and tibial internal rotation strength compared with the St group. Although semitendinosus and StG group showed significantly more anterior tibial translation, there was no significant difference in clinical and dynamic stability measurements.

ACL Reconstruction Using Quadrupled Semitendinosus Versus Double-Stranded Semitendinosus and Gracilis Autograft: 2-Year Results From a Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

Background: A disadvantage of using hamstring tendon autograft consisting of the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is pain from tendon harvesting and persistent hamstring weakness. In the tendon-sparing all-inside technique, a quadrupled semitendinosus graft and adjustable-loop cortical fixation are suggested to give less postoperative flexion deficits while displaying overall similar clinical results to the traditional hamstring technique. However, there are a limited number of high-quality studies comparing these techniques with inconsistent results. Purpose: To investigate differences between the all-inside (quadrupled semitendinosus) and traditional hamstring (double-stranded semitendinosus and gracilis) technique regarding (1) self-reported function, (2) hamstring strength, and (3) knee laxity. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: A total of 98 patients were randomized to either the all-inside or the traditional hamstring technique. Perioperatively, duration of surgery and graft size were obtained. The International Knee Documentation Committee 2000 Subjective Knee Form score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Tegner Activity Scale score, knee laxity (KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side difference and pivot shift), range of motion, isokinetic knee strength, and hop test score were collected preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. Return-to-sport readiness was evaluated 9 months postoperatively. Results: A total of 89 patients completed 2-year follow-up, 45 patients with the all-inside technique and 44 patients with the traditional hamstring technique. There were no significant differences between groups in any of the outcome measures 2 years after surgery, but there was a tendency in the all-inside group toward having increased anterior translation (mean, 3.6 mm vs 2.7 mm), a higher number of revision surgeries (5 patients vs 2 patients), and more patients having +1 and +2 pivot-shift values (29 vs 18 patients) when compared with the traditional group. Conclusion: The all-inside technique yields equivalent results to the traditional hamstring technique 2 years after surgery and should be considered a reliable technique to use for ACL reconstruction. Sparing the gracilis tendon does not lead to less persistent hamstring weakness. Long-term follow-up is needed to further determine whether the tendency of increased anterior translation seen at 2 years postoperatively will lead to a higher risk of graft failure.

Comparison of the Functional Outcomes of Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction through the All-inside and Outside-in Techniques: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objective To compare the functional outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with hamstring autograft (HA) through the all-inside (AI) technique with adjustable-loop cortical Endobutton (Smith & Nephew, Watford, Hertfordshire, England) on the sides of the femur and tibia and through the outside-in (OI) technique using an interference screw on the tibial side and a cortical Endobutton on the femoral side. Materials and Methods The present is a double-blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 44 patients undergoing arthroscopic ACL reconstruction from February 2019 to February 2022 in a tertiary care hospital. As per computer-based randomization, the patients were distributed into two groups: the AI and OI groups. Both groups were evaluated for 12 months using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, and part I (pain score) and part II (function score) of the Knee Society Score (KSS). Results On postoperative day 2, the VAS score was significantly higher in the OI group ( p = 0.0001), but insignificant ( p = 0.807) at 6 weeks. At 3, 6, and 12 months of follow-up, the score on the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale was significantly higher ( p = 0.001) in the AI group. At 6 months, both parts of the KSS showed a significant difference, with the AI group presenting a better outcome ( p = 0.04). However, at 12 months, the AI group presented a better score on part I of the KSS, but no differences were observed regarding part II. Conclusion In a follow-up of 12 months, the patients submitted to the AI technique presented better outcome scores and pain relief than those submitted to the OI technique.

Meniscal Repair with ArthroZheal® an Autologous Bioactive Fibrin Scaffold. A New Technique and Treatment Option.

Injuries of the meniscus often lead to changes in joint biomechanics, which affect the load distribution and contact stresses. The menisci consist of a peripheral vascular region (red zone) and an inner avascular region (white zone). The blood supply plays an important role in the healing of meniscal tears. Surgical treatment of such lesions includes meniscectomy/meniscoplasty and repair, depending on the type of injury, where "meniscoplasty" refers to the treatment modality that occurs under coblation. The application of Autologous Bioactive Matrix (ABM) has been shown to promote healing in such lesions. In addition, a special type of PRF (ArthroZheal®, Vivostat A/S, Allerød, Denmark) has been demonstrated to have healing effects in extracellular matrix synthesis and cell proliferation, as well as regenerative and remodeling effects. This autologous product can be applied directly at the meniscal repair site. We performed a prospective study on meniscus repair with ArthroZheal® alone (plus meniscoplasty) and ArthroZheal® together with an all-inside suturing technique using the STAR AccurFix Meniscal Repair Device system (STAR Sports Medicine, Beijing, China), depending on the type and the site of the lesion. One hundred twenty knees (110 patients) were identified through the use of clinical examination and MRI scan. The study took place between January 2023 and August 2023. Two groups were created: GROUP A was treated only with ArthroZheal®(plus meniscoplasty) and GROUP B was treated with a combination of ArthroZheal® and an all-inside suturing technique (STAR AccurFix). Pre- and postoperative grading was performed with the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score and the Tegner Activity Level Scale (Tegner Score). The results with both treatment methods were excellent and meniscus restoration has been documented on MRIs conducted 6 months post-op. In 15 patients, 2nd-look arthroscopy was performed through a nanoscope on an outpatient basis, and showed meniscal healing and remodeling. Tegner scores and IKDC scores in both groups showed significant improvement. Meniscal repair should be performed at all costs to maintain meniscal integrity and prevent long-term degenerative changes. New treatment methods include orthobiologics and all-inside suturing techniques. The main idea is to apply an autologous biological scaffold which is able to carry cells into the meniscal lesion and to allow their differentiation, proliferation, and extracellular matrix synthesis to produce a meniscal-like tissue. Our results suggest that the application of autologous ABM (ArthroZheal®) for the treatment of such lesions by means of dry arthroscopy results in better MRI, pain management and functional results at 3 months post-op, and these improvements can persist for up to 6 months.

Outcomes from different aspects indicate the all-inside technique may serve as an ideal option for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

To evaluate the postoperative outcomes of the all-inside technique in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Patients who underwent ACLR using the all-inside technique between 2018 and 2021 were retrospectively assessed. All patients were followed up for at least 2 years. Functional recovery and pain relief were assessed using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and visual analogue scale (VAS). Instrumented laxity was assessed via side-to-side difference using the Kneelax3 arthrometer. Graft maturity was estimated using the signal-to-noise quotient value based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Adverse events during and after the surgery were recorded. A total of 78 patients were included in this study, with a mean age of 28.1 ± 7.6 years. The IKDC (p < 0.001), Lysholm (p < 0.001) and KOOS (p < 0.001 for all subgroups) scores at the final follow-up were significantly higher than those before the surgery. The VAS scores (p < 0.05) were significantly lower than those before surgery. The side-to-side difference results indicated that 50 patients had a difference of less than 3 mm, indicating a tight graft, whereas only 1 patient had a difference of >5 mm, indicating a loose graft. The median signal-to-noise quotient of the graft on MRI was 1.4 (P25, P75: 1.0, 2.0). No intraoperative adverse events were observed. Postoperative adverse events included three cases of infection, three cases of graft rerupture, two cases of cyclops lesion and one case of surgical intervention for a meniscal tear. ACLR using the all-inside technique offers promising results in patients with ACL rupture. Level IV.

Arthroscopic repair is an effective treatment for dynamic medial ankle instability secondary to posttraumatic and partial injury of the deltoid ligament deep fascicle.

When the intermediate or collicular fascicle of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) is injured, the diagnosis of posttraumatic medial ankle instability (MAI) is supported. The aim of this study was to describe an arthroscopic all-inside MCL repair after posttraumatic MAI secondary to an isolated injury of the MCL deep fascicle with a knotless suture anchor technique. Seven patients (seven men, median age: 23 [19-28] years) with posttraumatic MAI were treated by arthroscopic means after failing nonoperative management. The median follow-up was 34 (13-75) months. The MCL was repaired with an arthroscopic all-inside technique. A tear affecting the deep and intermediate or collicular fascicle of the MCL was observed in all cases. In addition, five patients were diagnosed with an isolated fibular anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) detachment, and in two patients, both the ATFL and calcaneofibular ligament were involved. All patients reported subjective improvement after the arthroscopic ligament repair. The median American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society score increased from 68 (range: 64-70) preoperatively to 100 (range: 90-100) at final follow-up. Posttraumatic MAI can be successfully treated by an arthroscopic all-inside repair of the MCL. The presence of an MCL tear affecting the tibiotalar ligament fibres attached to the area of the anterior colliculus should be considered a sign of posttraumatic MAI. This partial deltoid injury at the level of the intermediate or collicular fascicle will conduct to a dynamic MAI. Level IV.

Outside in and all inside approach for repair of meniscal tears: post-operative subjective evaluation: a retrospective study

Background: Assess clinical outcomes after using outside-in, all-inside or combination of both approaches for meniscal repair. Methods: 86 patients with diagnosed meniscal tears, operated between January 2017 and January 2019 by one surgeon in Northway Clinic, Vilnius and Vilnius Clinical Hospital were surveyed. The meniscal repair techniques used included all-inside, outside-in, or a combination. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, with meniscal retear indicating failure. Ethical approval was deemed unnecessary for this project. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 29.01. Results: Patients undergoing the outside-in approach scored 89.4±12.5 on the IKDC questionnaire, compared to 88.5±16.6 for all-inside and 82.8±20.3 for both techniques combined (p=0.194). Kaplan–Meier analysis showed a 5.6-year survival rate of 80.9% with the all-inside approach. Subjective knee function assessment indicated scores of 8.50±1.9 for outside-in, 8.49±1.4 for all-inside, and 8.16±1.95 for both techniques. Cox proportional hazards model analysis suggested that older age and higher BMI trended towards reduced reoperation risk (hazard ratio, 0.93 and 0.98; p=0.246 and p=0.832, respectively). Conclusions: Self-reported outcomes in this study evaluated by IKDC questionnaire and subjective function assessment emphasize that both all-inside, outside-in or combination of the techniques provide similar results. All adverse outcomes defined as meniscal retears were observed using all-inside technique.

All-inside endoscopic semiautomatic running locked stitch technique shows favourable outcomes for acute Achilles tendon ruptures.

The safety and reliability of endoscopic Achilles tendon rupture repair are still concerning aspects. This study's aim is to evaluate an all-inside endoscopic semiautomatic running locked stitch (Endo-SARLS) technique. Forty cases with acute Achilles tendon rupture were treated with the all-inside Endo-SARLS technique between 2020 and 2021. Under endoscopic control, the proximal tendon stumps were stitched with the running locked method using a semiautomatic flexible suture passer. The threads of the high-strength suture were grasped through the paratenon subspace and then fixed into calcaneal insertion with a knotless anchor. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), surgical timeand complications were assessed. Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS), Achilles Tendon Resting Angle (ATRA)and Heel Rise Height Scale (HRHS) were utilised to evaluate final outcomes. The average follow-up time was 25.4 ± 0.4 (range: 24-32) months. Appropriate tendon regeneration was observed on MRI after 12 months. At the final follow-up, the median value of ATRS score was 95 (interquartile range: 94, 98). Furthermore, there is no significant difference between the injured and contralateral side in the average ATRA (18.2 ± 1.8 vs. 18.3 ± 1.9°, ns) and median value of HRHS [14.5 (13.3, 15.5) vs. 14.8 (13.5, 15.6) cm, ns]. No infection and nerve injuries were encountered. Thirty-ninepatients reported that they resumed casual sports activity after 6 months. One patient had a slight anchor cut-out, due to an addition injury, which was removed after 5 months. An all-inside Endo-SARLS technique showed promising clinical results for acute Achilles tendon ruptures. This procedure reduces the risk of sural nerve injuries while establishing a reliable connection between the tendon stumps. Level IV.