ALK-rearranged Non-small Cell Lung Research Articles

Successful treatment with alectinib after crizotinib-induced hepatitis in ALK-rearranged advanced lung cancer patient: a case report

BackgroundBesides the clinical benefit of crizotinib in ALK-rearranged metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), concerns about its hepatotoxicity have arisen. It is not clear whether this is a drug class side effect or if the use of other selective ALKs inhibitors is safe after this serious adverse event. While evidence from clinical trials is scarce, reports of treatment after crizotinib-induces hepatitis may add to clinical decision.Case presentationHerein, we report a case of acute hepatitis induced by crizotinib in a 32-years-old female diagnosed with metastatic NSCLC, harboring the ALK-rearrangement. After 60 days of crizotinib therapy, the patient presented with acute hepatitis, diagnosed after investigation of non-specific symptoms, such as nausea and fatigue. Serum aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels had increased from baseline to 3010 IU/L and 9145 IU/L, respectively. Total bilirubin increased up to 7.91 mg/dL, but she did not develop liver failure. After crizotinib discontinuation, a gradual hepatic function recovery occurred. Unfortunately, during the period without specific oncology treatment, her disease showed an unequivocal progression. Therefore, she started on alectinib with great response, and no liver function alteration recurred.ConclusionsThis case suggests that alectinib, even belonging to the same drug class, could be used as an alternative agent when crizotinib is the etiology of liver damage, but more robust evidence has awaited.

Combining ALK Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization and Immunohistochemistry to Analyze Multiple Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Samples per Patient Reveals Intermethod and Intersample-discrepant Results.

ALK inhibitors have improved the therapeutic management of patients with ALK-rearranged advanced non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). Several diagnostic methods, mainly fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC), can be used as single or combined tests to detect the so-called "ALK-positive" NSCLC. Intersample and intermethod discrepancies could cause issues with therapeutic consequences in ALK testing. In this article, we report a case series of our real-life experience and issues in combining FISH and IHC in multiple tumor samples per patient to diagnose and treat a subset of "ALK-positive" patients with NSCLC. Among analyses conducted in 40 samples of 18 patients with advanced lung adenocarcinomas, we retrospectively encountered 10 patients with intersample-concordant ALK FISH and IHC results. Discrepant results about FISH and/or IHC were noted between different samples in 8 patients. Therapeutic responses were observed in 5 of 10 crizotinib-treated patients including 1 patient with ALK FISH+ IHC- status and 1 patient with ALK FISH- IHC+ status. Our data highlight the difficulty to predict the response/nonresponse to crizotinib therapy, in patients with advanced NSCLC, not only on the basis of single and multiple tumor samples, but also on the basis of single and combined diagnostic methods.

Brigatinib, a new treatment option in ALK-rearranged advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma

Brigatinib, a new treatment option in ALK-rearranged advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma

Brigatinib, a new treatment option in ALK-rearranged advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement is a rare feature in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), occurring in around 5% of the patients (1). This oncogenic addiction is more frequent in no/light-smokers, in thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF1)-positive adenocarcinoma, with cribriform architecture and ring cells (2). ALK rearrangement—most of the time a translocation with a partner gene—induces the formation of a fusion protein with oncogenic properties. The first targeted therapy developed for ALK -rearranged NSCLC was crizotinib, an ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Crizotinib was proved to be superior to chemotherapy in first-line setting in ALK -rearranged NSCLC, with an overall response rate (ORR) of 74% and a progression-free survival (PFS) of 10.9 months (3). Crizotinib in first-line treatment is now widely used. Other ALK TKIs have been developed, as brigatinib. Results of the phase I-II trial published in 2016 showed in 79 advanced NSCLC patients treated with brigatinib an ORR at 75% [72% in previously crizotinib treated patients (n=71)] and a PFS (median) of 13.2 months (4). Safety profile showed specific lung toxicity, occurring at the beginning of the treatment (median 2 days) in 8% of the patients, with incidence increasing with the dose of brigatinib. The ALTA trial, published in May 2017 in Journal of Clinical Oncology by Kim et al . was a phase II trial that randomized patients with advanced ALK -rearranged NSCLC between 2 doses of brigatinib (90 mg daily and 90 mg daily for 7 days then 180 mg daily) (5). The primary endpoint was ORR, and no comparison between the 2 arms was pre-planned. Assuming an ORR ≥35% with a power of 90% and a bilateral alpha risk at 0.025, the study had to include 109 patients per arm. Patients should have an advanced ALK -rearranged NSCLC with progression with crizotinib and a performance status (PS) between 0 and 2. Brain metastases were allowed only if asymptomatic and with stable doses of steroid treatment. Two-hundred and twenty-two patients were randomized [112 patients arm A (90 mg) and 110 patients arm B (90 mg then 180 mg)]. Both arms were well-balanced, with a median age at 54 years, 57% of women, 31% of Asian, 60% of non-smokers, 97% of adenocarcinoma, 69% of brain metastases. ORR (investigator-assessed) was 45% in arm A and 54% in arm B, and disease-control rate was 82% (arm A) and 86% (arm B). Median time to response was 1.8 months (arm A) and 1.9 months (arm B), and duration of response was 13.8 months (arm A) and 11.8 months (arm B). Median PFS was 9.2 months (arm A) and 12.9 months (arm B). Post-hoc comparison between the 2 arms for PFS showed a clear benefit for arm B, with a hazard ratio (HR) at 0.55 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.36–0.86]. One-year overall survival (OS) probability was 71% (arm A) and 80% (arm B). As shown in the phase I-II trial, brigatinib had intracranial efficacy. ORR for measurable brain metastases was 42% (arm A, n=26) and 67% (arm B, n=18). For active brain metastases (i.e., metastases without previous brain radiotherapy, or progression after brain radiotherapy), intracranial ORR was 42% (arm A, n=19) and 73% (arm B, n=15). Intracranial PFS (median) was 15.6 months (arm A) and 12.8 months (arm B), with a duration of intracranial response (median) not reached in both arms. In term of safety, no new signal was detected. In both arms, main toxicities (≥10% patients) were nausea (33%/40%), diarrhea (19%/38%), vomiting (24%/23%), headache (28%/27%), decrease appetite (22%/15%) and hypertension (11%/21%). Grade 3–4 toxicities were rare: hypertension (6%/6%), increased creatine phosphokinase (3%/9%) and rash (1%/3%), mainly. Pulmonary early toxicity occurred in 6% of patients (n=14), during the first 2 days of treatment (always at 90mg daily of brigatinib). Grade 3–5 pulmonary toxicities concerned 3% of patients (n=7). Half of the patients (n=7) had successfully continued brigatinib after suspension, whereas 7 patients stopped brigatinib definitely. One patient died from acute respiratory failure (<1%). Multivariate analysis showed that advanced age [odds ratio (OR) =2.10; 95% CI, 1.21–3.65] and time from last crizotinib dose to first brigatinib dose less than 7 days (OR =3.88; 95% CI, 1.10–13.68) were associated with early pulmonary toxicity. Seven percent (arm A) and 20% (arm B) patients had dose reduction, due to increase of creatine phosphokinase, pneumonitis and rash.

445PD ASCEND-6: single-arm, open label, multicenter phase 1/2 study of ceritinib in Chinese pts with advanced ALK-rearranged (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with crizotinib

445PD ASCEND-6: single-arm, open label, multicenter phase 1/2 study of ceritinib in Chinese pts with advanced ALK-rearranged (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with crizotinib

Abstract 2103: Activating alternative receptor tyrosine kinases induced alectinib-resistance in ALK rearranged non-small cell lung cancer cells

Abstract Background The second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), alectinib, demonstrated high response rate, long response duration and a favorable toxic profile in patients with ALK-rearranged advanced non-small cell lung cancer in a phase II study (Lancet Oncol 14:590-8, 2013). However, even this promising drug is predicted to develop acquired resistance. Therefore, we investigated the mechanisms of resistance using two alectinib-resistant cell lines. Methods We established alectinib-resistant cell lines, H2228/CHR and ABC-11/CHR, from H2228 (EML4-ALK fusion genes variant 3a/b E6) and ABC-11 (EML4-ALK fusion genes variant 3b E6) respectively, by continuous exposure to alectinib. They were characterized using MTT assay, Western blotting, receptor tyrosine kinase array, ELISA, FISH, RT-PCR, and xenograft models. Results H2228/CHR and ABC-11/CHR cells were 117- and 40-fold more resistant than the parental lines, respectively, and maintained downstream AKT and ERK phosphorylation even in the presence of 10 μM alectinib. There were no ALK secondary mutations in those resistant cell lines. H2228/CHR lost the EML4-ALK fusion gene, and exhibited increased activation of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (HER3) with overexpression of the HER3 ligand neuregulin 1. Accordingly, pharmacologic inhibition of IGF-1R and HER3 signaling overcame the resistance. In ABC-11/CHR, MET was activated by stimulated hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) autocrine signaling. We found HGF gene translocation underlying the HGF autocrine system. Anti-HGF antibody suppressed the MET activation and combined treatment with alectinib and anti-HGF antibody or a MET inhibitor suppressed downstream signaling in ABC-11/CHR cells. Finally, crizotinib, which targets both ALK and MET, most effectively inhibited the growth of ABC-11/CHR both in vitro and in vivo. Conclusions We identified novel alectinib resistance mechanisms caused by the activation of alternative tyrosine kinase receptors. Our findings provide new insights into constructing a therapeutic strategy for ALK-positive lung cancer. Citation Format: Hideko Isozaki, Eiki Ichihara, Masayuki Yasugi, Nagio Takigawa, Kadoaki Ohashi, Toshio Kubo, Takashi Ninomiya, Nobuaki Ochi, Daisuke Minami, Kenichiro Kudo, Yuka Kato, Hiroe Kayatani, Tomoki Tamura, Kiichiro Ninomiya, Toshio Higo, Tsuyoshi Makimoto, Akiko Sato, Katsuyuki Hotta, Kunio Matsumoto, Toshiaki Sendo, Mitsune Tanimoto, Katsuyuki Kiura. Activating alternative receptor tyrosine kinases induced alectinib-resistance in ALK rearranged non-small cell lung cancer cells. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 2103.

419O Efficacy and safety of ceritinib in patients (pts) with ALK-rearranged (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and baseline brain metastases (BM) – results from ASCEND-2 and ASCEND-3

419O Efficacy and safety of ceritinib in patients (pts) with ALK-rearranged (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and baseline brain metastases (BM) – results from ASCEND-2 and ASCEND-3

BMET-35CERITINIB IN ALK+ NSCLC METASTATIC TO BRAIN AND/OR LEPTOMENINGES: THE ASCEND-7 STUDY

BACKGROUND: The anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitor (ALKi) crizotinib achieves high responses in patients with ALK-rearranged (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, disease progression can occur within 1 year and the brain/central nervous system (CNS) is a common site of progression/relapse. Ceritinib is a novel oral ALKi with 20-fold greater potency than crizotinib in enzymatic assays and crosses the blood-brain barrier with good CNS penetration in preclinical studies. In phase 1 and 2 studies, ceritinib was highly active in ALK+ NSCLC patients (regardless of prior crizotinib exposure) and achieved intracranial responses in 31-59% of patients with measurable baseline brain lesions. METHODS: This international, prospective, phase 2, open-label study will evaluate the antitumor activity of ceritinib in patients with ALK+ NSCLC and active brain metastases (BM) or leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC), either with or without prior whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) (ASCEND-7; NCT02336451). Eligible patients must have ALK+ (centrally assessed) NSCLC with active CNS metastases and ≥1 extracranial measurable lesion using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. Patients must be neurologically stable prior to study drug administration and will be allocated to 1 of 5 arms: active BM without LC, with prior ALKi exposure, with or without prior WBRT (Arms 1 and 2, respectively); active BM without LC, with no prior ALKi exposure, with or without prior WBRT (Arms 3 and 4, respectively); LC with or without evidence of active lesion at baseline (Arm 5). Oral ceritinib 750 mg/day will be dosed on a continuous schedule. The primary and key secondary objectives are to evaluate overall response rate and disease control rate, respectively. Other secondary objectives include assessment of intracranial and extracranial response for all patients and overall survival and safety for all patients in arms 1-4, including pharmacokinetics for each of arms 1-5. Enrollment is ongoing.