Aldehyde Dehydrogenase Reaction Research Articles

A bioluminescence assay for aldehyde dehydrogenase activity

The aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) family of enzymes is critical for cell survival and adaptation to cellular and environmental stress. These enzymes are of interest as therapeutic targets and as biomarkers of stem cells. This article describes a novel, homogeneous bioluminescence assay to study the activity of the ALDH enzymes. The assay is based on a proluciferin–aldehyde substrate that is recognized and utilized by multiple ALDH enzyme isoforms to generate luciferin. A detection reagent is added to inactivate ALDH and generate light from the luciferin product. The luminescent signal is dependent on the ALDH enzyme concentration and the incubation time in the ALDH reaction; moreover, the luminescent signal generated with the detection reagent is stable for greater than 2h. This assay provides many advantages over standard NADH fluorescence assays. It is more sensitive and the signal stability provided allows convenient assay setup in batch mode-based high-throughput screens. The assay also shows an accurate pharmacological response for a common ALDH inhibitor and is robust, with a large assay window (S/B=64) and Z′=0.75.

231ABC-Transporter mediated efflux of aldehyde dehydrogenase reaction product: Implications for enumeration and isolation of functional blood progenitor cells

231ABC-Transporter mediated efflux of aldehyde dehydrogenase reaction product: Implications for enumeration and isolation of functional blood progenitor cells

Ethanol Metabolism and the Transition from Organic Chemistry to Biochemistry

To ease the transition from organic chemistry at the beginning of a biochemistry course or at the beginning of the metabolism section of the organic course, an early presentation of the oxidation of ethanol is proposed. Alcohol dehydrogenase and aldehyde dehydrogenase reactions can smooth the introduction to biochemistry, since they involve three of the simplest compounds: ethanol, acetaldehyde, and acetic acid. Using these reactions as a model encourages the study of metabolic pathways by a systematic approach rather than by rote memorization. Reactions that can be presented as variations on a theme include methanol poisoning, the polyol reaction, and, most important, the sequence glycerol-3-phosphate to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate to 3-phosphoglyceric acid. This last sequence integrates lipid and carbohydrate metabolism and, by comparison with the model reaction, brings out the principles of substrate-level phosphorylation. The method has evoked favorable verbal feedback from students and, in addition to medical and graduate courses, has been successfully used in the biochemical section of an undergraduate organic course.

Novel alcohol dehydrogenase activity in a mutant of Salmonella able to use ethanol as sole carbon source

We selected a mutant of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium that is capable of growing in air on ethanol as sole carbon and energy source. This adhI mutant expressed high levels of a novel alcohol dehydrogenase (AdhI) that uses ethanol, 1-propanol and 2-propanol as substrates. The fermentative AdhE alcohol dehydrogenase was not expressed aerobically in the adhI mutant. Anaerobically, both the novel AdhI enzyme and the AdhE were expressed simultaneously in the adhI mutant. However, the adhI mutant showed no alteration in the composition of the fermentation products. In addition we found that both the parental Salmonella and its alcohol using adhI mutant expressed substantial levels of a dye-linked aldehyde dehydrogenase that is presumably responsible for conversion of acetaldehyde to acetate. This contrasts with the situation in Escherichia coli where mutants able to grow on ethanol express high aerobic levels of the AdhE enzyme, which performs both the alcohol dehydrogenase and aldehyde dehydrogenase reactions.

Novel alcohol dehydrogenase activity in a mutant of Salmonella able to use ethanol as sole carbon source.

We selected a mutant of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium that is capable of growing in air on ethanol as sole carbon and energy source. This adhI mutant expressed high levels of a novel alcohol dehydrogenase (AdhI) that uses ethanol, 1-propanol and 2-propanol as substrates. The fermentative AdhE alcohol dehydrogenase was not expressed aerobically in the adhI mutant. Anaerobically, both the novel AdhI enzyme and the AdhE were expressed simultaneously in the adhI mutant. However, the adhI mutant showed no alteration in the composition of the fermentation products. In addition we found that both the parental Salmonella and its alcohol using adhI mutant expressed substantial levels of a dye-linked aldehyde dehydrogenase that is presumably responsible for conversion of acetaldehyde to acetate. This contrasts with the situation in Escherichia coli where mutants able to grow on ethanol express high aerobic levels of the AdhE enzyme, which performs both the alcohol dehydrogenase and aldehyde dehydrogenase reactions.

On the Role of Conserved Histidine 106 in 10-Formyltetrahydrofolate Dehydrogenase Catalysis: CONNECTION BETWEEN HYDROLASE AND DEHYDROGENASE MECHANISMS

The enzyme, 10-formyltetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase (FDH), converts 10-formyltetrahydrofolate (10-formyl-THF) to tetrahydrofolate in an NADP(+)-dependent dehydrogenase reaction or an NADP(+)-independent hydrolase reaction. The hydrolase reaction occurs in a 310-amino acid long amino-terminal domain of FDH (N(t)-FDH), whereas the dehydrogenase reaction requires the full-length enzyme. The amino-terminal domain of FDH shares some sequence identity with several other enzymes utilizing 10-formyl-THF as a substrate. These enzymes have two strictly conserved residues, aspartate and histidine, in the putative catalytic center. We have shown recently that the conserved aspartate is involved in FDH catalysis. In the present work we studied the role of the conserved histidine, His(106), in FDH function. Site-directed mutagenesis experiments showed that replacement of the histidine with alanine, asparagine, aspartate, glutamate, glutamine, or arginine in N(t)-FDH resulted in expression of insoluble proteins. Replacement of the histidine with another positively charged residue, lysine, produced a soluble mutant with no hydrolase activity. The insoluble mutants refolded from inclusion bodies adopted a conformation inherent to the wild-type N(t)-FDH, but they did not exhibit any hydrolase activity. Substitution of alanine for three non-conserved histidines located close to the conserved one did not reveal any significant changes in the hydrolase activity of N(t)-FDH. Expressed full-length FDH with the substitution of lysine for the His(106) completely lost both the hydrolase and dehydrogenase activities. Thus, our study showed that His(106), besides being an important structural residue, is also directly involved in both the hydrolase and dehydrogenase mechanisms of FDH. Modeling of the putative hydrolase catalytic center/folate-binding site suggested that the catalytic residues, aspartate and histidine, are unlikely to be adjacent to the catalytic cysteine in the aldehyde dehydrogenase catalytic center. We hypothesize that 10-formyl-THF dehydrogenase reaction is not an independent reaction but is a combination of hydrolase and aldehyde dehydrogenase reactions.

Drosophila melanogaster alcohol dehydrogenase: mechanism of aldehyde oxidation and dismutation.

Drosophila alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh) catalyses the oxidation of both alcohols and aldehydes. In the latter case, the oxidation is followed by a reduction of the aldehyde, i.e. a dismutation reaction. At high pH, dismutation is accompanied by a small release of NADH, which is not observed at neutral pH. Previously it has been emphasized that kinetic coefficients obtained by measuring the increase in A340, i.e. the release of NADH at high pH is not a direct measure of the aldehyde oxidation reaction and these values cannot be compared with those for alcohol dehydrogenation. In this article we demonstrate that this is not entirely true, and that the coefficients phiB and phiAB, where B is the aldehyde and A is NAD+, are the same for a dismutation reaction and a simple aldehyde dehydrogenase reaction. Thus the substrate specificity of the aldehyde oxidation reaction can be determined by simply measuring the NADH release. The coefficients for oxidation and dehydrogenation reactions (phi0d and phiAd respectively) are complex and involve the constants for the dismutation reaction. However, dead-end inhibitors can be used to determine the quantitative contribution of the kinetic constants for the aldehyde oxidation and reduction pathways to the phi0d and phiAd coefficients. The combination of dead-end and product inhibitors can be used to determine the reaction mechanism for the aldehyde oxidation pathway. Previously, we showed that with Drosophila Adh, the interconversion between alcohols and aldehydes followed a strictly compulsory ordered pathway, although aldehydes and ketones formed binary complexes with the enzyme. This raised the question regarding the reaction mechanism for the oxidation of aldehydes, i.e. whether a random ordered pathway was followed. In the present work, the mechanism for the oxidation of different aldehydes and the accompanying dismutation reaction with the slow alleloenzyme (AdhS) from Drosophila melanogaster has been studied. To obtain reliable results for the liberation of NADH during the initial-rate phase, the reaction was measured with a sensitive recording filter fluorimeter, and the complexes formed with the different dead-end and product inhibitors have been interpreted on the basis of a full dismutation reaction. The results are only consistent with a compulsory ordered reaction mechanism, with the formation of a dead-end binary enzyme-aldehyde complex. Under initial-velocity conditions, the rate of acetate release was calculated to be larger than 2.5 s-1, which is more than ten times that of NADH. The substrate specificity constant (kcat/Km or 1/phiB) with respect to the oxidation of substrates was propan-2-ol>ethanol>acetaldehyde>trimethylacetaldehyde.

Expression, Purification, and Properties of the Aldehyde Dehydrogenase Homologous Carboxyl-terminal Domain of Rat 10-Formyltetrahydrofolate Dehydrogenase

The liver cytosolic enzyme, 10-formyltetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase (FDH) (EC 1.5.1.6) catalyzes two reactions: the NADP+-dependent oxidation of 10-formyltetrahydrofolate to tetrahydrofolate and CO2 and the NADP+-independent hydrolysis of 10-formyltetrahydrofolate to tetrahydrofolate and formate. The COOH-terminal domain of the enzyme (residues 420-902) is about 48% identical to a family of NAD-dependent aldehyde dehydrogenases (EC 1.2.1.3), and FDH possesses aldehyde dehydrogenase activity. We expressed the COOH-terminal domain (residues 420-902) of FDH in insect cells using a baculovirus expression system. The recombinant protein was released from insect cells to the culture medium and was purified from the medium by a two-step procedure: precipitation with 35% saturated ammonium sulfate followed by chromatography on hydroxyapatite. The purified COOH-terminal domain displayed aldehyde dehydrogenase activity similar to that of native FDH but had neither dehydrogenase nor hydrolase activity toward folate substrates. Aldehyde dehydrogenase activity of the COOH-terminal domain and FDH was independent of the presence of 2-mercaptoethanol while 10-FDDF dehydrogenase activity of FDH occurred only in the presence of 2-mercaptoethanol. The COOH-terminal domain existed as a tetramer showing that the sites for oligomerization of subunits in native FDH resides in this domain. Using titration of tryptophan fluorescence, it was found that the COOH-terminal domain bound NADP+ to the same extent as FDH (Kd 0.2 and 0.3 microM, respectively) but did not bind folate. Both FDH and its COOH-terminal domain also bound NAD+ (Kd 11 and 16 microM, respectively) as measured by fluorescence titration. Both proteins were able to catalyze the aldehyde dehydrogenase reaction utilizing NADP+ or NAD+, but the Km for NAD+ was three orders higher than that for NADP+ (2 mM and 1.5-2.0 microM, respectively). The concentration of NAD+ required for the reaction was high compared with the physiological level of NAD+, suggesting that the reaction does not occur in vivo. NAD+ at physiological concentrations stimulated the aldehyde dehydrogenase reaction performed by FDH or its COOH-terminal domain using NADP+.

Kinetic and structural evidence for the identification of 11-hydroxythromboxane B 2 dehydrogenase as cytosolic aldehyde dehydrogenase

We have recently purified 11-hydroxythromboxane B 2 dehydrogenase from porcine kidney and identified it as cytosolic aldehyde dehydrogenase (EC 1.2.1.3) based on amino acid analysis and other protein characteristics. In the present paper we have studied the catalytic interaction of thromboxane B 2 (TXB 2) with different aldehyde substrates and a potent aldehyde dehydrogenase inhibitor, disulfiram. TXB 2 was a competitive inhibitor of the aldehyde dehydrogenase reaction in assays with 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetaldehyde, a high affinity substrate. The conversion of TXB 2 to 11-dehydro-TXB 2 was also inhibited by propanal and disulfiram. The protein characteristics of the enzyme have also been further studied. The native enzyme is a tetramer and has an isoelectric point of 7.0 which is comparable with that of cytosolic aldehyde dehydrogenases from other species. Taken together the present data further indicate that 11-hydroxythromboxane B 2 dehydrogenase is identical with cytosolic aldehyde dehydrogenase and that substrates and inhibitors of aldehyde dehydrogenase interact with thromboxane metabolism in vitro.

Site-directed mutagenesis shows that the conserved cysteine residues of histidinol dehydrogenase are not essential for catalysis.

Histidinol dehydrogenase (HDH) catalyzes two sequential oxidation reactions to produce histidine from histidinol via histidinaldehyde. In HDH proteins so far reported, two Cys residues are conserved. From the results of the studies on Salmonella typhimurium HDH, it has been proposed that one of these two conserved Cys residues is involved in the thiohemiacetal formation at the aldehyde oxidation step [Grubmeyer and Gray (1986) Biochemistry 25, 4778-4784]. To clarify the reaction mechanism, we investigated the role of the conserved Cys residues by site-directed mutagenesis in cabbage HDH. Thus, Cys-112, that corresponds to the catalytic Cys residue of the Salmonella enzyme, and the other conserved one, Cys-149, were replaced with Ala, Ser, or Phe. All the Cys-112 mutant HDHs catalyzed both the alcohol dehydrogenase and aldehyde dehydrogenase reactions, producing 1 mol of L-histidine during the reduction of 2 mol of NAD+, as did the wild type HDH. Site-directed mutagenesis at Cys-149 did not cause significant changes in the catalytic properties, either. These observations, together with the results of detailed comparison of the catalytic properties of mutant HDHs, clearly indicate that neither Cys-112 nor Cys-149 is involved in the reaction, and ruled out the involvement of thiohemiacetal formation in the histidinol dehydrogenase reaction.

Kinetic mechanism of histidinol dehydrogenase: histidinol binding and exchange reactions.

Salmonella typhimurium histidinol dehydrogenase produces histidine from the amino alcohol histidinol by two sequential NAD-linked oxidations which form and oxidize a stable enzyme-bound histidinaldehyde intermediate. The enzyme was found to catalyze the exchange of 3H between histidinol and [4(R)-3H]NADH and between NAD and [4(S)-3H]NADH. The latter reaction proceeded at rates greater than kcat for the net reaction and was about 3-fold faster than the former. Histidine did not support an NAD/NADH exchange, demonstrating kinetic irreversibility in the second half-reaction. Specific activity measurements on [3H]histidinol produced during the histidinol/NADH exchange reaction showed that only a single hydrogen was exchanged between the two reactants, demonstrating that under the conditions employed this exchange reaction arises only from the reversal of the alcohol dehydrogenase step and not the aldehyde dehydrogenase reaction. The kinetics of the NAD/NADH exchange reaction demonstrated a hyperbolic dependence on the concentration of NAD and NADH when the two were present in a 1:2 molar ratio. The histidinol/NADH exchange showed severe inhibition by high NAD and NADH under the same conditions, indicating that histidinol cannot dissociate directly from the ternary enzyme-NAD-histidinol complex; in other words, the binding of substrate is ordered with histidinol leading. Binding studies indicated that [3H]histidinol bound to 1.7 sites on the dimeric enzyme (0.85 site/monomer) with a KD of 10 microM. No binding of [3H]NAD or [3H]NADH was detected. The nucleotides could, however, displace histidinol dehydrogenase from Cibacron Blue-agarose.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Reversal of part of the aldehyde dehydrogenase reaction pathway during the hydrolysis of an ester

An aldehyde dehydrogenase from rabbit liver, a homogeneous protein on three distinct polyacrylamide-gel systems, has an associated 4-nitrophenyl esterase activity. At pH 7.0 in the presence of 80 micrometer-NADH and 800 micrometer-4-nitrophenyl acetate the enzyme produces NAD+ and a stoicheiometric amount of an aldehyde, as well as hydrolysing the ester. On this and other evidence it is proposed that ester hydrolysis occurs at the usual active site of the enzyme.

Incorporation of the 1‐pro‐R and the 1‐pro‐S Hydrogen Atoms of Ethanol into Steroids and Phosphatidylcholines in vivo

The transfer of deuterium from chiral 1-monodeuteroethanols to various metabolites formed in the liver was studied in order to investigate the coupling of metabolic reductions to the alcohol dehydrogenase and the aldehyde dehydrogenase reactions. The ethanols were administered to female bile fistula rats for 10 h. The hydrogen at C-2 in the glycerol moiety of newly formed phosphatidylcholine molecules in bile, liver and plasma was derived to 22-25% from the 1-pro-R position and to 5-6% from the 1-pro-S position in the ethanol. sn-Glycerol 3-phosphate isolated from liver had a lower deuterium content at C-2. The ratio between the contributions from the two positions in ethanol to C-2 of free sn-glycerol 3-phosphate was the same as in the phosphatidylcholines. This indicates that the higher degree of labelling of this position in phosphatidylcholines is not due to a specific coupling between alcohol dehydrogenase and the formation of a phosphatidylcholine precursor. Cholesterol and chenodeoxycholic acid in bile became increasingly labelled, and the ratio between the incorporations from the 1-pro-S and the 1-pro-R positions of ethanol was about 0.37 in cholesterol and 0.46 in chenodeoxycholic acid. Thus, these NADPH-dependent reactions utilized hydrogen from the 1-pro-S position to a larger extent than NADH-dependent reactions.