Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs) are becoming more and more used for different applications. Since AUVs are not physically connected to anything, they are well suited to execute long-range missions in unknown waters and to collect data from the surrounding environment. The most important parameters to consider when designing AUVs for such missions are endurance, flexibility, weight and volume. Very accurate sensors give high performances to today’s AUVs, but also make them energy intensive, which has a strong impact on the AUVs’ endurance. Hydrogen for conversion in fuel cells has a higher specific energy (kWh/kg) and a lower specific power (kW/kg) than secondary batteries. A promising alternative to reach both power and range demands of the AUVs is therefore to design hybrid fuel cell/battery systems. The Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell (PEMFC) works at close to ambient temperatures and is the most common fuel cell on the market. In the AUV application the volume is limited, and both H2 and O2 utilization must be optimized as much as possible. Due to the space limitation, it is also complicated to add sub-components such as re-circulation pumps or condenser units to the system. In order to maximize the hydrogen utilization in the stack, the fuel cell is running in so-called dead-end mode, where the hydrogen is trapped inside the stack in order to force it to react. In such a mode, water accumulates in the membrane and transfers from the cathode to the anode, causing the cell performance to drop dramatically. A previous study on a 6-cells PEMFC stack in a closed environment [1] showed that the fuel cell should operate at high relative humidity, with a limited forced convection and deliver a relatively low current in order to increase the time between two necessary hydrogen purges and maintain the performance of the stack over time. In this configuration, the six cells composing the stack are in series both electronically and in terms of hydrogen flow. This means that the first cell receives fresh hydrogen and its outlet is the hydrogen inlet for the next cell. The purge valve is placed right after the last cell, in this so-called “single-purging” strategy.In a new developed setup presented in the attached Figure, the hydrogen flow within the stack is reversed after each hydrogen purge. In this configuration, the last cell that was receiving hydrogen, after each purge instead becomes the first cell to receive hydrogen. This purging strategy is called “symmetric purging”. Unlike for the previous study, the voltage of each cell is now monitored during the experiments.This study presents the results of the comparison between the two purging strategies. Galvanostatic experiments at relatively low current with different set times between the purges, or voltage-drop purge criteria, are performed and the behaviour of both the stack and each individual cell is studied. A minimum of 40 purges occurs for each experiment. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy is performed in order to highlight the impact of each strategy on the cells’ degradation. Preliminary results show that both strategies lead to a stable voltage of the stack during the experiments. However, when studying the voltage of each individual cell over time, some differences appear depending on the purging strategy. With the symmetric purging strategy, the individual cells reach a steady-state faster and show less variation over time than with the single-purging strategy. Future experiments will provide more results and help to find the best purging strategy for a PEM fuel cell stack working in a closed environment, i.e. be the most suitable strategy for fuel cell-powered AUVs.[1]: Chiche, A., Lindbergh, G., Stenius, I., & Lagergren, C. (2021). Design of experiment to predict the time between hydrogen purges for an air-breathing PEM fuel cell in dead-end mode in a closed environment. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46(26), 13806-13817. Figure 1
Read full abstract