Aggressive Lipid-lowering Therapy Research Articles

Transplantation of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia living donor liver resulting in early myocardial infarction: a possible dangerous link.

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is a lifesaving procedure that is often curative for several liver diseases. Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a metabolic disease that results from an autosomal dominant mutation in the low-density lipoprotein receptor; yet, young patients with FH can live years without detection. Herein, we report a case of a patient who developed early myocardial infarction (MI) after having a transplant from a donor with undetected heterozygous FH. This was a 67-year-old female with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis-related liver cirrhosis, free from coronary artery disease, who underwent LDLT from her daughter, a 45-year-old female with no past medical history. One year post-transplant, she presented with an acute MI with a large atherosclerotic burden. Genetic analysis confirmed heterozygous FH in the donor but not in the recipient. This case emphasizes the importance of incorporating a thorough clinical history and lipid profile into pre-transplant testing for both the recipient and donor, as well as aggressive lipid-lowering therapy post-transplantation to avoid cardiovascular complications.

Abstract 11810: Is the Presence of Statin Use Before Onset of Disease Associated With In-Hospital Mortality in Elderly Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction?

Introduction: The effect of statin on preventing cardiovascular events is clear, and aggressive lipid-lowering therapy with statins is strongly recommended for patients with coronary artery disease including of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Hypothesis: The relationship between in-hospital mortality of AMI and statin use before onset of AMI in the elderly patients is unknown, we thus assessed. Methods: The subjects were 207 consecutive AMI patients aged 65 years or older who underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at Kagoshima university hospital between January 2015 and March 2021. We investigated the association between in-hospital mortality after PCI and baseline characteristics including Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score, which is widely used for estimating mortality in AMI patients. Results: Twenty-three patients (11%) died in-hospital. The mortality rate was significantly lower in patients who were taking statins at presentation compared to those who were not (3% vs. 16%, p=0.002). Univariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors for in-hospital mortality revealed that statin use before onset of AMI, level of serum albumin, level of high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and GRACE risk score were associated with in-hospital mortality. Multivariate logistic analysis models adjusted for age, statin use, level of serum albumin, level of hs-CRP, and GRACE risk score showed that statin use [Odd's ratio (OR): 0.13, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.02-0.81, p=0.029] and GRACE risk score (OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02-1.06, p <0.001) were independently associated with in-hospital mortality. The optimal cut-off on the receiver-operating characteristic curve of GRACE risk score for predicting in-hospital mortality was 160. In addition, multivariate logistic analysis models using GRACE risk score ≥160 and non-use of statin before the onset of AMI showed greater risk of in-hospital mortality (HR 19.24; 95% CI 6.62-55.94; p <0.001) after PCI as compared to patients with GRACE risk score <160 and statins use. Conclusions: In elderly AMI patients undergoing PCI, statin use before the onset of AMI was an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality, as was the GRACE risk score.

Risk Factors for Vulnerable Plaque Detected Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Patients Receiving Statin Therapy with No History of Coronary Artery Disease.

Residual risk of atherosclerosis remains high despite the use of lipid-lowering therapy with statins. Near-infrared spectroscopy intravascular ultrasound imaging (NIRS-IVUS) can identify vulnerable plaque via the detection of lipid-rich plaque. This study aimed to reveal the clinical characteristics of patients with vulnerable plaque despite statin therapy.NIRS-IVUS was used to determine the maximum 4 mm Lipid Core Burden Index (MaxLCBI4 mm) values of 38 de novo culprit lesions from 32 patients with acute coronary syndrome (53%) (mean age: 73.1 ± 13.1 years) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention after a minimum 6 months of statin therapy for primary prevention. A patient with vulnerable plaque was defined as an individual presenting at least 1 target lesion with a vulnerable plaque (MaxLCBI4 mm > 400). Overall, the average low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level was 95.5 ± 27.2 mg/dL. Patients in the vulnerable plaque group were younger and had higher LDL-C, triglycerides, and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels than those in the non-vulnerable plaque group. The MaxLCBI4 mm was positively correlated with LDL-C (P = 0.0002), triglycerides (P = 0.0003), and non-HDL-C (P = 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, all 3 treatable lipid components failed to show an independent relationship with the patients with vulnerable plaque. Using receiver-operating characteristics curve analysis, the cutoff points for LDL-C, triglycerides, and non-HDL-C were determined to be 78 mg/dL, 108 mg/dL, and 111 mg/dL, respectively, at MaxLCBI4 mm > 400. In conclusion, this study supports a more comprehensive and aggressive lipid-lowering therapy for the primary prevention of coronary artery disease.

Plasma ANGPTL8 Levels and Risk for Secondary Cardiovascular Events in Japanese Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease Receiving Statin Therapy.

The ability to predict secondary cardiovascular events could improve health of patients undergoing statin treatment. Circulating ANGPTL8 (angiopoietin-like protein 8) levels, which positively correlate with proatherosclerotic lipid profiles, activate the pivotal proatherosclerotic factor ANGPTL3. Here, we assessed potential association between circulating ANGPTL8 levels and risk of secondary cardiovascular events in statin-treated patients. We conducted a biomarker study with a case-cohort design, using samples from a 2018 randomized control trial known as randomized evaluation of high-dose (4 mg/day) or low-dose (1 mg/day) lipid-lowering therapy with pitavastatin in coronary artery disease (REAL-CAD [Randomized Evaluation of Aggressive or Moderate Lipid-Lowering Therapy With Pitavastatin in Coronary Artery Disease])." From that study's full analysis set (n=12 413), we selected 2250 patients with stable coronary artery disease (582 with the primary outcome, 1745 randomly chosen, and 77 overlapping subjects). A composite end point including cardiovascular-related death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal ischemic stroke, or unstable angina requiring emergent admission was set as a primary end point. Circulating ANGPTL8 levels were measured at baseline and 6 months after randomization. Over a 6-month period, ANGPTL8 level changes significantly decreased in the high-dose pitavastatin group, which showed 19% risk reduction of secondary cardiovascular events compared with the low-dose group in the REAL-CAD [Randomized Evaluation of Aggressive or Moderate Lipid-Lowering Therapy With Pitavastatin in Coronary Artery Disease] study. In the highest quartiles, relative increases in ANGPTL8 levels were significantly associated with increased risk for secondary cardiovascular events, after adjustment for several cardiovascular disease risk factors and pitavastatin treatment (hazard ratio in Q4, 1.67 [95% CI, 1.17-2.39). Subgroup analyses showed relatively strong relationships between relative ANGPTL8 increases and secondary cardiovascular events in the high-dose pitavastatin group (hazard ratio in Q4, 2.07 [95% CI, 1.21-3.55]) and in the low ANGPTL8 group at baseline (166 <pmol/L, hazard ratio in Q4: 1.74, [95% CI, 1.04-2.93]). Monitoring ANGPTL8 levels over time might be useful to assess residual risk of cardiovascular secondary events in patients with cardiovascular disease undergoing statin therapy.

Feasibility of Short-Term Aggressive Lipid-Lowering Therapy with the PCSK9 Antibody in Acute Coronary Syndrome.

The guideline-recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol target level of <70 mg/dL may not be achieved with statin administration in some patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Therefore, the proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) antibody can be added to high-risk patients with ACS. Nevertheless, the optimal duration of PCSK9 antibody administration remains unclear. Patients were randomized to receive either 3 months of lipid lowering therapy (LLT) with the PCSK9 antibody followed by conventional LLT (with-PCSK9-antibody group) or 12 months of conventional LLT alone (without-PCSK9-antibody group). The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, unstable angina, and ischemia-driven revascularization. A total of 124 patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were randomly assigned to the two groups (n = 62 in each). The primary composite outcome occurred in 9.7% and 14.5% of the patients in the with- and without-PCSK9-antibody groups, respectively (hazard ratio: 0.70; 95% confidence interval: 0.25 to 1.97; p = 0.498). The two groups showed no significant differences in hospitalization for worsening heart failure and adverse events. In ACS patients who underwent PCI, short-term PCSK9 antibody therapy with conventional LLT was feasible in this pilot clinical trial. Long-term follow-up in a larger scale clinical trial is warranted.

Hyperlipidemia and Cardiovascular Disease in People with Type 1 Diabetes: Review of Current Guidelines and Evidence

In this review, we discuss the prevalence of cardiovascular disease in people with type 1 diabetes. We outline key risk factors associated with increased cardiovascular event rates and discuss the prevalence and mechanisms underlying hyperlipidemia in people with type 1 diabetes. Finally, we summarize the evidence to support early and more aggressive lipid-lowering therapy in people with type 1 diabetes and review current guideline recommendations. Comprehensive treatment of hyperglycemia, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia reduces adverse cardiovascular outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes. In contrast, evidence to support a comparable benefit of intensive cardiovascular risk factor management in people with type 1 diabetes is lacking from prospective, randomized trials and has only been shown in registries. Therefore, current treatment guidelines extrapolate prospective clinical trial evidence obtained in people with type 2 diabetes to provide similar treatment recommendations for people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Evidence supports the more aggressive treatment of cardiovascular risk factors in people with type 1 diabetes, who would likely benefit from early risk stratification and comprehensive risk factor management, including aggressive lipid-lowering therapy.

Thrombotic Risk Stratification and Intensive Statin Therapy for Secondary Prevention of Coronary Artery Disease - Insights From the REAL-CAD Study.

It is unknown whether beneficial effects of higher-dose statins on cardiovascular events are different according to the thrombotic risk in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS).Methods and Results: The Randomized Evaluation of Aggressive or Moderate Lipid-Lowering Therapy with Pitavastatin in Coronary Artery Disease (REAL-CAD) study is a randomized trial comparing 4 mg and 1 mg pitavastatin in patients with CCS. This study categorized 12,413 patients into 3 strata according to the CREDO-Kyoto thrombotic risk score: low-risk (N=9,434; 4 mg: N=4,742, and 1 mg: N=4,692), intermediate-risk (N=2,415; 4 mg: N=1,188, and 1 mg: N=1,227); and high-risk (N=564; 4 mg: N=269, and 1 mg: N=295). The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal ischemic stroke, or unstable angina. Cumulative 4-year incidence of the primary endpoint was significantly higher in the high-risk stratum than in the intermediate- and low-risk strata (11.0%, 6.3%, and 4.5%, P<0.0001). In the low-risk stratum, the cumulative 4-year incidence of the primary endpoint was significantly lower in the 4 mg than in the 1 mg group (4.0% and 4.9%, P=0.02), whereas in the intermediate- and high-risk strata, it was numerically lower in the 4 mg than in the 1 mg group. There was no significant treatment-by-subgroup interaction for the primary endpoint (P-interaction=0.77). High-dose pitavastatin therapy compared with low-dose pitavastatin therapy was associated with a trend toward lowering the risk for cardiovascular events irrespective of the thrombotic risk in patients with CCS.

Aggressive lipid-lowering therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention - for whom and how?: Aggressive lipid-lowering therapy after PCI.

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been established as a definitive method to treat obstructive coronary artery disease. The procedure on its own, however, is insufficient to ensure optimal long-term patient outcomes as it is also necessary to achieve good control of relevant risk factors. The process of atherosclerosis as a result of dyslipidaemia is a risk continuum and secondary preventive measures for patients who have undergone PCI are of paramount importance to mitigate the risk of procedural failure and further cardiovascular events. This review aims to provide an overview of the landscape of lipid-lowering therapy for the purpose of secondary prevention by summarising recommendations derived from contemporary guidelines and highlighting the rationale and evidence behind the three main lipid-lowering therapies, namely statins, ezetimibe and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors. It also provides insights into real-world challenges and issues surrounding secondary prevention of dyslipidaemia such as suboptimal lipid goal attainment and nonadherence, and assesses the possible methods to overcome them.

Abstract P039: Low-density Lipoprotein Management In Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease With And Without Severe Hypercholesterolemia In A Largely Rural Population

Background: Elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) is associated with increased risk for peripheral artery disease (PAD) and major limb or adverse cardiovascular events. We aimed to compare the prevalence and appropriate lipid-lowering treatment of patients diagnosed with PAD with and without prior phenotypic severe hypercholesterolemia (SH) in a large, rural healthcare system. Methods: Retrospective study of ambulatory adults with a lipid panel at Essentia Health clinics obtained between 7/1/2016-6/30/2019 (MN, WI, and ND, USA) with PAD on the problem list (defined based on ICD-9/10 codes). Patients were divided into two groups, PAD only and PAD with SH. Phenotypic SH was defined as any prior LDL ≥ 190 mg/dL. Patients were excluded if they were currently pregnant (n=232) or if they did not have repeat LDL &gt; 30 days apart (n=1684). High-intensity statin was considered atorvastatin 40mg or 80mg or rosuvastatin 20mg or 40mg daily. Results: A total of 10,874 patients were previously diagnosed with PAD (mean age 40.4 + 10.9, 43.3% female (N=4711), 58.1% rural (N=6319). A total of 13.6% (N=1484) had SH. Patients with PAD and SH were more likely to be female, urban, have prior acute limb ischemia, stroke/transient ischemic attack, and were less likely to have diabetes or chronic limb ischemia than patients with PAD only. Patients with PAD and SH were more likely to be on a high intensity statin than those with PAD only (65.8% (N=977) vs. 51.3% (N=4813); p&lt;0.001). Very few patients received no lipid-lowering therapy (PAD with SH 0.7% (N=10) vs. PAD alone 2.1% (N=234). More patients with PAD and SH received PCKS9 inhibitors (2.5% (N=37) vs 0.4% (N=39); p&lt;0.001) and ezetimibe (23.4% (N=347) vs. 8.1% (N=760); p&lt;0.001) than patients with PAD only. Approximately 50% (N=749) of PAD with SH patients achieved a 50% lowering from peak LDL compared to 28.9% (N=2717) with PAD only. Mean LDL in the PAD with SH was 113.9 + 43.4 mg/dL compared to 81.8 + 29.1 mg/dL in patients with PAD without SH. However, fewer patients with PAD and SH achieved a LDL &lt;70 mg/dL compared to those with PAD only (13.3% (N=197) vs 37.1% (N=3487), p&lt; 0.001). Conclusion: One in 10 patients with PAD has a history of SH and majority are not achieving target LDL&lt;70mg/dL. There is an urgent need for more aggressive lipid-lowering therapy for all patients with PAD.

Small Dense Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Cardiovascular Risk in Statin-Treated Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.

Aim: We investigated the relationship between small dense low-density cholesterol (sdLDL-C) and risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients treated with high- or low-dose statin therapy. Methods: This was a prospective case-cohort study within the Randomized Evaluation of Aggressive or Moderate Lipid-Lowering Therapy with Pitavastatin in Coronary Artery Disease (REAL-CAD) study, a randomized trial of high- or low-dose (4 or 1 mg/d pitavastatin, respectively) statin therapy, in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). Serum sdLDL-C was determined using an automated homogenous assay at baseline (randomization after a rule-in period, ＞1 month with 1 mg/d pitavastatin) and 6 months after randomization, in 497 MACE cases, and 1543 participants randomly selected from the REAL-CAD study population. Results: High-dose pitavastatin reduced sdLDL-C by 20% than low-dose pitavastatin (p for interaction ＜0.001). Among patients receiving low-dose pitavastatin, baseline sdLDL-C demonstrated higher MACE risk independent of LDL-C (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], 4th versus 1st quartile, 1.67 [1.04–2.68];p for trend=0.034). High-dose (versus low-dose) pitavastatin reduced MACE risk by 46% in patients in the highest baseline sdLDL-C quartile (＞34.3 mg/dL; 0.54 [0.36–0.81];p=0.003), but increased relative risk by 40% in patients with 1st quartile (≤ 19.5 mg/dL; 1.40 [0.94–2.09];p=0.099) and did not alter risk in those in 2nd and 3rd quartiles (p for interaction=0.002). Conclusions: These findings associate sdLDL-C and cardiovascular risk, independent of LDL-C, in statin-treated CAD patients. Notably, high-dose statin therapy reduces this risk in those with the highest baseline sdLDL-C.

Acute arterial events across all vascular territories in the FOURIER trial

Abstract Background In the FOURIER (Further Cardiovascular Outcomes Research With PCSK9 Inhibition in Patients With Elevated Risk) trial, adding the PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab to statin therapy reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and cardiovascular risk. Although atherosclerotic coronary, cerebrovascular, and peripheral vascular events share a related pathobiology, the effect of aggressive LDL-C lowering with PCSK9 inhibition on the risk of acute arterial events across all three vascular beds is not well-described. Purpose To assess the efficacy of evolocumab on acute arterial events in all vascular territories including coronary, cerebral, and peripheral vascular beds. Methods In the FOURIER trial, patients (n=27,564) with stable atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL on a statin were randomly assigned to evolocumab versus placebo and followed for a median of 2.2 years (1.8–2.5). Acute arterial events were defined as a composite of coronary (coronary heart disease [CHD] death, myocardial infarction [MI], or urgent coronary revascularization), cerebrovascular (ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack [TIA], or urgent cerebral revascularization), or peripheral vascular (acute limb ischemia, major amputation, or urgent peripheral revascularization) events. Cox proportional-hazard models were used to assess the efficacy of evolocumab on these outcomes. Landmark and total event analyses were also done. Results Of the 2,210 first acute arterial events occurring during follow-up, 74% were coronary, 22% were cerebrovascular, and 4% were peripheral vascular. Evolocumab reduced the risk of a first acute arterial event by 19% (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.74–0.88; P&amp;lt;0.001), with significant individual reductions in acute coronary (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.75–0.91; P&amp;lt;0.001), acute cerebrovascular (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.65–0.92; P=0.004), and acute peripheral vascular (HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.38–0.88; P=0.01) events (Figure, top). The magnitude of the risk reduction with evolocumab tended to increase over time, with a 16% reduction (HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.75–0.96) in the first year followed by a 24% reduction (HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.67–0.85) thereafter (Figure, bottom). There were 3,780 total acute arterial events (first plus recurrent), with a 22% reduction with evolocumab (incidence rate ratio [RR] 0.78; 95% CI 0.70–0.87). Evolocumab prevented 496 total acute arterial events as compared to 222 first events. Conclusions The addition of the PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab to statin therapy reduced the risk of acute arterial events across all vascular territories with a robust effect over time. These findings indicate a pan-vascular impact of aggressive lipid-lowering therapy on these acute and clinically meaningful events. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): The FOURIER trial was supported by Amgen.

Effect of evolocumab on acute arterial events across all vascular territories : results from the FOURIER trial

We assessed the impact of the proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor evolocumab on acute arterial events across all vascular territories, including coronary, cerebrovascular, and peripheral vascular beds, in patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). In the FOURIER trial, 27 564 patients with stable ASCVD on statin therapy were randomly assigned to evolocumab or placebo. Acute arterial events were a composite of acute coronary (coronary heart disease death, myocardial infarction, or urgent coronary revascularization), cerebrovascular (ischaemic stroke, transient ischaemic attack, or urgent cerebral revascularization), or peripheral vascular (acute limb ischaemia, major amputation, or urgent peripheral revascularization) events. Of the 2210 first acute arterial events, 74% were coronary, 22% were cerebrovascular, and 4% were peripheral vascular. Evolocumab reduced first acute arterial events by 19% (hazard ratio [HR] 0.81 [95% confidence interval 0.74-0.88]; P < 0.001), with significant individual reductions in acute coronary (HR 0.83 [0.75-0.91]), cerebrovascular (HR 0.77 [0.65-0.92]), and peripheral vascular (HR 0.58 [0.38-0.88]) events. There were 3437 total events (first plus recurrent), with evolocumab reducing total events by 24% (incidence rate ratio 0.76 [0.69-0.85]). The magnitude of reduction in acute arterial events with evolocumab numerically increased over time, with a 16% reduction (HR 0.84 [0.75-0.95]) in the first year followed by a 24% reduction (HR 0.76 [0.67-0.85]) thereafter. The addition of the PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab to statin therapy reduced acute arterial events across all vascular territories with a robust effect over time, indicating a pan-vascular impact of aggressive lipid-lowering therapy on these acute and clinically meaningful events. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01764633.

Design and rationale of the EVOCATION trial: A prospective, randomized, exploratory study comparing the effect of evolocumab on coronary microvascular function after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with stable coronary artery disease

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a standard treatment in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD); however, periprocedural myocardial infarction (PMI) remains a common complication of PCI. Aggressive lipid-lowering therapy with statin has shown to reduce the incidence of PMI by preventing coronary microvascular dysfunction. It is unclear whether evolocumab, a potent lipid-lowering agent, could diminish microvascular damage after PCI. The EVOCATION trial (jRCTs051180022) is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, parallel-group, exploratory, investigator-initiated clinical study to evaluate whether pretreatment with evolocumab could decrease the index of microvascular resistance (IMR) after PCI in patients with stable CAD. This study population consists of 100 patients with stable CAD who will undergo PCI and have high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels despite administration of maximum tolerated dose of statins for at least 2 weeks. Eligible patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either evolocumab 140 mg every 2 weeks in addition to standard of care treatment or standard of care treatment only for 2–6 weeks before PCI. The primary endpoint is IMR after PCI. The EVOCATION trial will evaluate whether pretreatment with evolocumab reduces periprocedural microvascular damage in patients with stable CAD undergoing PCI.

Lipoprotein(a) Testing Patterns in a Large Health System

Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] is associated with increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). As directed therapy for Lp(a) emerges, it is important to understand patterns of Lp(a) testing in routine clinical practice. We set out to characterize Lp(a) testing across a large academic health system. Using electronic health record (EHR) data from 2014 to 2019, we compared patients who underwent Lp(a) testing to date-matched peers who had low density lipoprotein (LDL-C) assessment alone. We analyzed ordering provider characteristics and rates of initiation of new lipid lowering therapy (LLT) within 12 months after testing. Of 1,296 adults with Lp(a) test results, 629 (48.5%) had prior history of ASCVD and 667 (51.4%) did not. Compared with those with LDL-C testing alone, individuals who underwent Lp(a) testing were more like to have a myocardial infarction or ischemic stroke at a young age and multiple prior cardiovascular events. Though the majority of Lp(a) tests were ordered in outpatient encounters, a higher proportion of Lp(a) tests compared with LDL-C tests were performed in the inpatient setting. Neurology and psychiatry were the most common specialty to order Lp(a) tests in our cohort. There was a significantly increased initiation of LLT after Lp(a) testing compared with LDL-C testing across all medication types. Consistent with guidelines, Lp(a) testing is used in those with early onset ASCVD, and among those with multiple cardiovascular events. Lp(a) testing is associated with more aggressive LLT in following year. Further research is needed to characterize Lp(a) testing across larger populations.

Escalation of liPid-lOwering therapy in patientS wiTh vascular disease receiving HIGH-intensity statins: the retrospective POST-HIGH study

In this retrospective study, we investigated whether lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) escalation has clinical benefits in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels of 55–99 mg/dL (1.4–2.6 mmol/L), post high-intensity. Out of 6317 Korean patients screened in 2005–2018, 1159 individuals with ASCVD and LDL-C levels of 55–99 mg/dL after statin use equivalent to 40 mg atorvastatin were included. After 1:2 propensity score matching, 492 patients (164 with LLT escalation, 328 controls without LLT escalation) were finally analysed. Primary outcome variables were major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and all-cause death. At median follow-up (1.93 years), the escalation group had a lower MACCE rate (1.72 vs. 3.38 events/100 person-years; hazard ratio [HR] 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14–0.83; p = 0.018) than the control group. The incidence of all-cause death (0.86 vs. 1.02 events/100 person-years; HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.15–2.19; p = 0.42) and each MACCE component did not differ between groups. Kaplan–Meier curves exhibited lower risk of MACCE in the escalation group (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.12–0.97; p = 0.040) but a difference not statistically significant in all-cause death (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.04–2.48; p = 0.26). LLT escalation was associated with reduced cardiovascular risk, supporting more aggressive LLT in this population.

Familial Hypercholesterolemia Identification Algorithm in Patients with Acute Cardiovascular Events in A Large Hospital Electronic Database in Bulgaria: A Call for Implementation.

BackgroundFamilial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a genetic disorder characterized by a high level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and is an important cause for premature cardiovascular disease. Because of underdiagnoses, an acute event is often the first clinical manifestation of FH. There are limited data on the prevalence and treatment of FH among adults admitted for treatment of acute cardiovascular events in Bulgaria. Our objective was to assess the proportion and management of FH patients from those admitted to hospital for treatment of acute symptomatic acute atherosclerotic cardiovascular events (ASCVD), the achievement of LDL-C targets of European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society guidelines and related public healthcare resources.ObjectiveDigitalized healthcare records for patients admitted for treatment of symptomatic ASCVD acute events between August 2018 and August 2019 were used for the analysis. Five cardiology hospitals provided data for hospitalizations, laboratory tests, and ambulatory follow-ups up to February 2020. Patients’ hospital and ambulatory records were linked, and medical histories were extracted via a specifically developed algorithm, and analyzed. Outcomes included the proportion of patients classified as FH as defined by the Dutch Lipid Network Criteria (DLNC), use of lipid-lowering therapy, LDL-C achieved by 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-index event, and public resources spent on hospital and ambulatory treatment.ResultsWe reviewed 11,090 hospital records of patients admitted for treatment of acute events in the period August 2018–August 2019 with ICD codes for ASCVD (Supplementary Table S3). FH was identified in 731 (6.6%) patients, with DLNC score ≥ 3, (682 with coronary artery disease, 32 with cerebrovascular disease, and 17 with peripheral artery disease). We did not find the criteria for FH in 5797 patients. The remaining 4562 records were inconclusive due to lack of data in the hospital dossier. Less than half of FH patients (274/731, 37%) were discharged on high-intensity statin therapy prescribed (34/731, 5%) with combination therapy. The vast majority (96.2% with LDL-C ≥ 1.8 mmol/l) had poorly controlled LDL-C during the first year after discharge. Patients with a probable/definite DLNC score ≥ 6 points and those with recurrent events contributed to the higher cost paid both by the healthcare system and the patients themselves.ConclusionThese findings reinforce the need for more aggressive lipid-lowering therapy, and underline the efficiency of using an electronic medical records search tool to support physicians in improving early FH diagnosis, aiming to minimize residual and future ASCVD events among FH patients and their family members. Supplementary file1 (MP4 21838 KB)Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-020-01608-3.

Lipid-Lowering Therapy in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease and Prior Stroke: Mission Impossible?

Hyperlipidemia is a powerful risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD). It has been known for a long time that lipid-lowering drugs significantly reduce morbidity from CHD, thus proving a causal role for cholesterol in coronary events. Conversely, the relationship between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and stroke has been less clear and debated for many years. Recent data conclusively demonstrate not only the inverse epidemiological relationship of blood LDL-C with stroke, but also the efficacy of different strategies to attain cholesterol-lowering on stroke. They also dissipate lingering doubts about the possibility that lipid-lowering is linked to an increase in hemorrhagic stroke. However, despite current international lipid guidelines now strongly recommend aggressive lipid-lowering therapy in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, including CHD and cerebrovascular disease (CeVD), secondary prevention patients are often undertreated with lipid-lowering therapies in routine clinical practice. This review highlights that patients with CHD and concomitant CeVD do not receive aggressive lipid-lowering therapy despite being at very high risk and with clear evidence of benefit from lowering LDL-C levels below current targets.

Non-culprit ruptured vulnerable plaque healing and stabilization by an aggressive lipid-lowering therapy

Non-culprit ruptured vulnerable plaque healing and stabilization by an aggressive lipid-lowering therapy

Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia.

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an inherited disorder with retarded clearance of plasma LDL caused by mutations of the genes involved in the LDL receptor-mediated pathway and most of them exhibit autosomal dominant inheritance. Homozygotes of FH (HoFH) may have plasma LDL-C levels, which are at least twice as high as those of heterozygous FH (HeFH) and therefore four times higher than normal levels. Prevalence of HoFH had been estimated as 1 in 1,000,000 before but more recent genetic analysis surveys predict 1 in 170,000 to 300,000. Since LDL receptor activity is severely impaired, HoFH patients do not or very poorly respond to medications to enhance activity, such as statins, and have a poorer prognosis compared to HeFH. HoFH should therefore be clinically distinguished from HeFH. Thorough family studies and genetic analysis are recommended for their accurate diagnosis.Fatal cardiovascular complications could develop even in the first decade of life for HoFH, so aggressive lipid-lowering therapy should be initiated as early as possible. Direct removal of plasma LDL by lipoprotein apheresis has been the principal measure for these patients. However, this treatment alone may not achieve stable LDL-C target levels and combination with drugs should be considered. The lipid-lowering effects of statins and PCSK9 inhibitors substantially vary depending on the remaining LDL receptor activity of individual patients. On the other hand, the action an MTP inhibitor is independent of LDL receptor activity, and it is effective in most HoFH cases.This review summarizes the key clinical issues of HoFH as well as insurance coverage available under the Japanese public healthcare system.

Abstract 13337: Increased Serum Immunoglobulin G4 Level is a Novel Predictor of Cardiovascular Events Independent of Established Risk Factors: Results From the Real-cad Study

Background: Inflammation is a mediator of atherosclerosis progression. However, it remains unclear whether immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)-related immuno-inflammation may play a specific role in cardiovascular disease. Methods: We used a case-cohort design to analyze the association of serum IgG4 levels with future cardiovascular events. The sample included 561 cases of the primary end point, defined as cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or unstable angina, and a random subcohort of 1688 (1409 males; mean age, 68.1 ± 8.4 years), of whom 73 were also cases, selected from 12413 eligible participants with stable coronary artery disease in the Randomized Evaluation of Aggressive or Moderate Lipid Lowering Therapy with Pitavastatin in Coronary Artery Disease (REAL-CAD) study. Results: This case-cohort study had a median follow-up of 3.9 years (interquartile range [IR] 2.9-4.6). Serum IgG4 levels at baseline were 45.3 mg/dL (IR 37.9-58.9), and 845 (50%) took high-dose statins in the subcohort sample. In Cox regression using age, gender, statin dose, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), body mass index, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), hypertension, diabetes, and serum lipid profiles, including low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and triglycerides, as covariates, the highest IgG4 quartile was predictive of the primary end point at 4 years (hazard ratio [HR] 1.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-2.00, P=0.031), compared with the lowest quartile. Similar results were observed for the secondary end point, a composite of the primary end point plus coronary revascularization (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.16-2.20, P=0.004). Conclusions: Elevated serum IgG4 level at baseline predicted long-term cardiovascular outcomes independent of established risk factors and high-dose statin therapy in patients with stable CAD. Serum IgG4 may reflect residual cardiovascular risk.