Aggresome Formation In Cells Research Articles

α-Synuclein Aggregation Intermediates form Fibril Polymorphs with Distinct Prion-like Properties

α-Synuclein (α-Syn) amyloids in synucleinopathies are suggested to be structurally and functionally diverse, reminiscent of prion-like strains. The mechanism of how the aggregation of the same precursor protein results in the formation of fibril polymorphs remains elusive. Here, we demonstrate the structure–function relationship of two polymorphs, pre-matured fibrils (PMFs) and helix-matured fibrils (HMFs), based on α-Syn aggregation intermediates. These polymorphs display the structural differences as demonstrated by solid-state NMR and mass spectrometry studies and also possess different cellular activities such as seeding, internalization, and cell-to-cell transfer of aggregates. HMFs, with a compact core structure, exhibit low seeding potency but readily internalize and transfer from one cell to another. The less structured PMFs lack transcellular transfer ability but induce abundant α-Syn pathology and trigger the formation of aggresomes in cells. Overall, the study highlights that the conformational heterogeneity in the aggregation pathway may lead to fibril polymorphs with distinct prion-like behavior.

P38δ MAPK regulates aggresome biogenesis by phosphorylating SQSTM1 in response to proteasomal stress

Aggresome formation is a major strategy to enable cells to cope with proteasomal stress. Misfolded proteins are assembled into micro-aggregates and transported to the microtubule organizing center (MTOC) to form perinuclear aggresomes before their degradation through autophagy. So far, multiple factors have been identified as the activators of micro-aggregate formation, but much less is known about the regulatory mechanisms of their transport. Here, we report that proteasomal stress leads to the activation of p38 MAPK family members. Two of them, p38γ (MAPK12) and p38δ (MAPK13), are dispensable for micro-aggregate formation but are required for their targeting to the MTOC. Interestingly, p38δ promotes micro-aggregate transport by phosphorylating SQSTM1, a major scaffold protein that assembles soluble ubiquitylated proteins into micro-aggregates. Expression of the phospho-mimetic mutant of SQSTM1 in p38δ-knockout cells completely rescued their aggresome formation defects and enhanced their resistance to proteasomal stress to wild-type levels. This study reveals p38δ-mediated SQSTM1 phosphorylation as a critical signal for the targeting of micro-aggregates to the MTOC and provides direct evidence for the survival advantages associated with aggresome formation in cells under proteasomal stress.

Accumulation of the PX domain mutant Frank-ter Haar syndrome protein Tks4 in aggresomes.

BackgroundCells deploy quality control mechanisms to remove damaged or misfolded proteins. Recently, we have reported that a mutation (R43W) in the Frank-ter Haar syndrome protein Tks4 resulted in aberrant intracellular localization.ResultsHere we demonstrate that the accumulation of Tks4R43W depends on the intact microtubule network. Detergent-insoluble Tks4 mutant colocalizes with the centrosome and its aggregate is encaged by the intermediate filament protein vimentin. Both the microtubule inhibitor nocodazole and the histone deacetylase inhibitor Trichostatin A inhibit markedly the aggresome formation in cells expressing Tks4R43W. Finally, pretreatment of cells with the proteasome inhibitor MG132 markedly increases the level of aggresomes formed by Tks4R43W. Furthermore, two additional mutant Tks4 proteins (Tks41–48 or Tks41–341) have been investigated. Whereas the shorter Tks4 mutant, Tks41–48, shows no expression at all, the longer Tks4 truncation mutant accumulates in the nuclei of the cells.ConclusionsOur results suggest that misfolded Frank-ter Haar syndrome protein Tks4R43W is transported via the microtubule system to the aggresomes. Lack of expression of Tks41–48 or aberrant intracellular expressions of Tks4R43W and Tks41–341 strongly suggest that these mutations result in dysfunctional proteins which are not capable of operating properly, leading to the development of FTHS.

Influenza A virus uses the aggresome processing machinery for host cell entry.

During cell entry, capsids of incoming influenza A viruses (IAVs) must be uncoated before viral ribonucleoproteins (vRNPs) can enter the nucleus for replication. After hemagglutinin-mediated membrane fusion in late endocytic vacuoles, the vRNPs and the matrix proteins dissociate from each other and disperse within the cytosol. Here, we found that for capsid disassembly, IAV takes advantage of the host cell's aggresome formation and disassembly machinery. The capsids mimicked misfolded protein aggregates by carrying unanchored ubiquitin chains that activated a histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6)-dependent pathway. The ubiquitin-binding domain was essential for recruitment of HDAC6 to viral fusion sites and for efficient uncoating and infection. That other components of the aggresome processing machinery, including dynein, dynactin, and myosin II, were also required suggested that physical forces generated by microtubule- and actin-associated motors are essential for IAV entry.

Activity and Cellular Functions of the Deubiquitinating Enzyme and Polyglutamine Disease Protein Ataxin-3 Are Regulated by Ubiquitination at Lysine 117

Deubiquitinating enzymes (DUbs) play important roles in many ubiquitin-dependent pathways, yet how DUbs themselves are regulated is not well understood. Here, we provide insight into the mechanism by which ubiquitination directly enhances the activity of ataxin-3, a DUb implicated in protein quality control and the disease protein in the polyglutamine neurodegenerative disorder, Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3. We identify Lys-117, which resides near the catalytic triad, as the primary site of ubiquitination in wild type and pathogenic ataxin-3. Further studies indicate that ubiquitin-dependent activation of ataxin-3 at Lys-117 is important for its ability to reduce high molecular weight ubiquitinated species in cells. Ubiquitination at Lys-117 also facilitates the ability of ataxin-3 to induce aggresome formation in cells. Finally, structure-function studies support a model of activation whereby ubiquitination at Lys-117 enhances ataxin-3 activity independent of the known ubiquitin-binding sites in ataxin-3, most likely through a direct conformational change in or near the catalytic domain.

PXII-6 Degradation an aggresome formation of the Gn tail of the apathogenic tula hantavirus

Aggresome formation in cells involves the failure of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway to dispose of proteins destined for degradation by the 26S proteasome. UBB+1 is present in Mallory bodies in alcoholic liver disease and in aggresomes formed in Alzheimer’s desease. The present investigation focuses on the role that UBB+1 plays in cytokeratin aggresome formation in Mallory bodies (MBs) in vitro. Immunoprecipitation with a monoclonal antibody to cytokeratin-8 (CK-8) was used. The immunoprecipitate was incubated for 24 h in the presence of different constituents involved in aggresome formation including ubiquitin, UBB+1, the proteasome inhibitor PS341, an ATP generating energy source, a deubiquitinating enzyme inhibitor, a purified proteasome fraction, and an E1–3 conjugating enzyme fraction. MB-like protein aggregates formed in the presence of ubiquitin, plus UBB+1 or PS341. These aggregates stained positively for CK-8. UBB+1, and a proteasome subunit Tbp7, as demonstrated on Western blots. A second approach was used to form MBs in vitro in cultured hepatocytes transfected with UBB+1 protein using Chariot. The cells were double stained using CK-8 and ubiquitin antibodies. The two proteins colocalized in MB-like aggregates. The results support the possibility that aggresome formation is a complex multifactor process, which is favored by inhibition of the proteasome and by the presence of UBB+1.

PXII-4 Human papillomavirus type 16: a study on its variants in the L1 gene

Aggresome formation in cells involves the failure of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway to dispose of proteins destined for degradation by the 26S proteasome. UBB+1 is present in Mallory bodies in alcoholic liver disease and in aggresomes formed in Alzheimer’s desease. The present investigation focuses on the role that UBB+1 plays in cytokeratin aggresome formation in Mallory bodies (MBs) in vitro. Immunoprecipitation with a monoclonal antibody to cytokeratin-8 (CK-8) was used. The immunoprecipitate was incubated for 24 h in the presence of different constituents involved in aggresome formation including ubiquitin, UBB+1, the proteasome inhibitor PS341, an ATP generating energy source, a deubiquitinating enzyme inhibitor, a purified proteasome fraction, and an E1–3 conjugating enzyme fraction. MB-like protein aggregates formed in the presence of ubiquitin, plus UBB+1 or PS341. These aggregates stained positively for CK-8. UBB+1, and a proteasome subunit Tbp7, as demonstrated on Western blots. A second approach was used to form MBs in vitro in cultured hepatocytes transfected with UBB+1 protein using Chariot. The cells were double stained using CK-8 and ubiquitin antibodies. The two proteins colocalized in MB-like aggregates. The results support the possibility that aggresome formation is a complex multifactor process, which is favored by inhibition of the proteasome and by the presence of UBB+1.

Protein Folding, Misfolding, and Aggregation. Formation of Inclusion Bodies and Aggresomes

In this review the mechanisms of protein folding, misfolding, and aggregation as well as the mechanisms of cell defense against toxic protein aggregates are considered. Misfolded and aggregated proteins in cells are exposed to chaperone-mediated refolding and are degraded by proteasomes if refolding is impossible. Proteolysis-stable protein aggregates accumulate, forming inclusion bodies. In eucaryotic cells, protein aggregates form structures in the pericentrosomal area that have been termed "aggresomes". Formation of aggresomes in cells is a general cellular response to the presence of misfolded proteins when the degrading capacity of the cells is exceeded. The role of aggresomes in disturbance of the proteasomal system operation and in cellular death, particularly in the so-called "protein conformational diseases", is discussed.

Microtubule disruption inhibits autophagosome-lysosome fusion: implications for studying the roles of aggresomes in polyglutamine diseases

Large cytoplasmic inclusions called aggresomes are seen in many protein conformational diseases including Huntington’s disease and Parkinson’s disease. The roles of inclusions and aggresomes in these diseases are unresolved critical issues that have been vigorously debated. Two recent studies used microtubule disruption with nocodazole to inhibit aggresome formation and observed increased toxicity of expanded polyglutamines in the context of huntingtin exon 1 and a truncated androgen receptor. Increased toxicity of expanded polyglutamines in the presence of nocodazole was correlated with decreased protein turnover, leading the authors to conclude that aggresomes were cytoprotective and that they directly enhanced clearance of the toxic proteins. Here we show that nocodazole has additional effects, which provide a simple alternative explanation for these previous observations. We confirmed aggresome formation in cells expressing proteins with polyalanine and polyglutamine expansions. As expected, we found a reduction in aggresome formation when microtubule function was disrupted using nocodazole. However, in addition to this effect, nocodazole treatment increased the proportions of cells with nuclear inclusions in PC12 cells expressing huntingtin exon 1 with 74 glutamines. This can be explained as nocodazole inhibits autophagosome-lysosome fusion, a key step in mutant huntingtin exon 1 clearance. This effect alone can explain the previous observations with this compound in polyglutamine diseases and raises doubts about the interpretation of some of the data that have been used to argue that aggresomes protect against polyglutamine mutations.

The mechanism of cytokeratin aggresome formation: the role of mutant ubiquitin (UBB +1)

Aggresome formation in cells involves the failure of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway to dispose of proteins destined for degradation by the 26S proteasome. UBB +1 is present in Mallory bodies in alcoholic liver disease and in aggresomes formed in Alzheimer’s desease. The present investigation focuses on the role that UBB +1 plays in cytokeratin aggresome formation in Mallory bodies (MBs) in vitro. Immunoprecipitation with a monoclonal antibody to cytokeratin-8 (CK-8) was used. The immunoprecipitate was incubated for 24 h in the presence of different constituents involved in aggresome formation including ubiquitin, UBB +1, the proteasome inhibitor PS341, an ATP generating energy source, a deubiquitinating enzyme inhibitor, a purified proteasome fraction, and an E 1–3 conjugating enzyme fraction. MB-like protein aggregates formed in the presence of ubiquitin, plus UBB +1 or PS341. These aggregates stained positively for CK-8. UBB +1, and a proteasome subunit Tbp7, as demonstrated on Western blots. A second approach was used to form MBs in vitro in cultured hepatocytes transfected with UBB +1 protein using Chariot. The cells were double stained using CK-8 and ubiquitin antibodies. The two proteins colocalized in MB-like aggregates. The results support the possibility that aggresome formation is a complex multifactor process, which is favored by inhibition of the proteasome and by the presence of UBB +1.