[MWS 7.1 (2007) 119-132] ISSN 1470-8078 Book Reviews Joachim Radkau, Max Weber. Die Leidenschaft des Denkens (Munich: Hanser, 2005), pp. 1000. ISBN 3446206752.45€. When Max Weber died in 1920, Karl Jaspers felt as if the German world had lost its heart. This was an emotion particularly felt amongst the younger members in Max Weber's sphere, although he was actually in fact a master without pupils. After being released from teaching duties, he spent most of his remaining lifetime as a private scholar. His worldwide fame started decades after his death. Nonethe less, he became an authority of modern social science, and the international Weber industry continues to grow. Twenty years earlier, Lawrence Scaff predicted that whoever was successful with his own Weber interpretation would determine the further progress of the social sciences. If this is right, one can certainly say that 'Weber is power7. This is also the conclusion of historian Joachim Radkau, who examines the life and work of Max Weber in this voluminous biography. To anticipate the following remarks: this book is the first biography of Weber since 1926 that really may be called a biography. All the other previous attempts were merely extracts of Marianne Weber7s Lebensbild of Max Weber, a hagiographie widow's portrait, first published in 1926. Radkau's book offers new insights even for those who are familiar with Weber7s life and work. He quotes sources from private archive material that have not been accessible up to now, especially Marianne's diaries as well as unpublished letters, including correspondence between Max and Marianne, his mother, and his two lovers. All these sources provide a deeper and more accurate understanding of Weber's life, particularly his affective life. But at the same time, these sources lead the biographer to a voyeuristic attitude that is occasionally embarrassing and detrimental to his performance. Previously, Joachim Radkau had distinguished himself especially in fields such as the history of medicine and the history of technology. He has been an unknown quantity in Weber research up to now. But this should not be a disadvantage, because many things are seen more clearly with distance. Due to this, Radkau is - pleasantly - far from palming his own Weber interpretation off on the reader, and, moreover, he is relatively fair in describing rival interpretations. It was surely a good decision of his, to consult the advice of experts such as Christoph Braun, Stefan Breuer, Wilhelm Hennis, M. Rainer Lepsius, and Günther Roth, although he did not consider much of their advice. Anyway, the 'passion' which appears as the subtitle of Radkau's book, is also to be observed in his consideration of Max Weber. Meticulously, he has got used to Weber's monumental work, following its aspects into their finest ramifications, and putting them into biographical contexts. What he wants to offer to the reader is 'the whole Weber' - from the dissertation and the studies on the stock© Max Weber Studies 2007, Department of Applied Social Sciences, London Metropolitan University, Old Castle Street, London El 7NT, UK. 120 Max Weber Studies market, the sociology of domination and the sociology of music, up to and including the love letters. Radkau's biography gives an intimate insight into Weber's life. It starts with the portrait of the scientist as a young man, growing up in a German upper-class family and feeling part of the elite. He then changes into the gruff, corpulent, hard drinking and duelling Heidelberg student, changes then again to become the newly appointed professor of economics demanding powerful imperial German politics in his Freiburg inaugural lecture, changing once more into the desperate workaholic trying to escape from depression, who was treated in mental hospitals year after year without any success. He concentrated later on his famous articles The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, and changed finally into the reconvalescent whose speed of life gained rapidly in the realms of love, science and politics, before he died, unexpectedly, in 1920. In the whole book it is transparent that Radkau's interest in Weber depends on his own field of research, the nerves. The author of a study on The Age of Nervousness has...
Read full abstract