188 SCIENCE FICTION STUDIES, VOLUME 46 (2019) samizdat literature, this was represented most notably by Arkady Rovner, Yuri Mamleyev, and the formidable cosmic fantasia The Rose of the World by Daniil Andreev [completed 1959; first published 1989], all of whom are absent from the picture). A lot of space is justly dedicated to Oles Berdnik, but not a word is written about his activity as an heir to the famous occultist Nicolas Roerich and as the leader of the “Spiritual Nation of Ukraine.” Curiously, his interstellar visions, as well as Efremov’s, are attributed to the theories of Teilhard de Chardin (248), but are not linked to the occultist tradition they helped to revive nor to the “Russian cosmists” Vladimir Vernadsky or Nikolai Fyodorov, whose names never appear in the Lajoyes’ book. These omissions resemble, in a supreme paradox, a kind of censorship. And one is rather puzzled by the fact that this new look at past sf territory is not so different from the old, almost forty years ago. Maybe this is the direct consequence of a rather poor bibliography that includes only a small number of recent works; while Anindita Banerjee’s We Modern People: Science Fiction and the Making of Russian Modernity (2012) is cited, Asif Saddiqi’s no-less excellent The Red Rockets’ Glare: Spaceflight and the Russian Imagination, 1857-1957 (2010) is not. This reviewer’s “professorial mind” is slightly disturbed by the absence of works in languages other than Russian, French, and English; one has to agree, however, that this is a common drawback in sf studies. That is why this reviewer can only add that whatever the shortcomings of the Lajoyes’ book are, it is still a very readable and useful introduction to Soviet sf. It makes one want to reread the masterpieces it discusses and to search for their successors.—Leonid Heller, Paris-Lausanne Repetition Without Much Difference. Susana Loza. Speculative Imperialisms: Monstrosity and Masquerade in Postracial Times. Lanham, MD: Lexington, 2018. x+193 pp. $90 hc. Susana Loza’s monograph Speculative Imperialisms sets out to explore the enduring legacies of colonialism (“classic” and “settler”) and racialized slavery in sf. She does so through a series of case studies: Chapter 1, “Playing the Alien in Postracial Times,” which looks at Avatar (2009) and District 9 (2009); Chapter 3, “Imperial Fictions, Postracial Fantasies: Doctor Who in the Age of Neoliberal Multiculturalism”; and Chapter 4, “Monkeys, Monsters, and Minstrels in Rise and Dawn of the Planet of the Apes”—and an intriguing Chapter 2, “Colonial Cosplay: Steampunk and the After-Life of Empire,” on debates in the steampunk community that have unfolded almost exclusively in the ephemeral spaces of blog posts, comments sections, and cosplay. Loza explores this sampling of recent texts to show that as much as things may seem to have changed, much remains the same. Overall, this study leaves little doubt that the state of popular sf today is anything but post-racial. What is less clear is whether anyone (or at least, anyone likely to seek out this book) seriously thinks otherwise, especially after RaceFail ’09 and the continuing “Puppy” battle against the Hugo awards (neither of which is addressed in the text). This book does important work 189 BOOKS IN REVIEW charting some of the contours of the persistence of racism, but it would be improved if it also attended more directly to some of the many spaces of resistance in the sf community, past and present, that collectively offer the other side of the conversation. The racism and rank colonialism that Loza sets out to “illuminate” are already well known—and vigorously contested—in sf fandom. The issue, in other words, is not so much whether race and colonialism are still live topics in sf (they are), but what sf has to say about race and colonialism. Loza’s monograph utilizes a novel methodology: “My analysis samples and remixes the voices of scholars, fans, and critics to illustrate the ubiquity and intractability of (settler) colonialism in SF” (2). This approach works best in the second chapter, especially when documenting the debates around a 2010 issue of a steampunk fanzine titled VictOrientalism. This issue, edited and posted by a...
Read full abstract