Therapy For Advanced Melanoma Research Articles

Ibrutinib topical delivery for melanoma treatment: The effect of nanostructured lipid carriers’ composition on the controlled drug skin deposition

Melanoma is responsible for more than 80% of deaths related to skin diseases. Ibrutinib (IBR), a Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has been proposed to treat this type of tumor. However, its low solubility, extensive first-pass effect, and severe adverse reactions with systemic administration affect therapeutic success. This study proposes developing and comparing the performance of two compositions of nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) to load IBR for the topical management of melanomas in their early stages. Initially, the effectiveness of IBR on melanoma proliferation was evaluated in vitro, and the results confirmed that the drug reduces the viability of human melanoma cells by inducing apoptosis at a dose that does not compromise dermal cells. Preformulation tests were then conducted to characterize the physical compatibility between the drug and the selected components used in NLCs preparation. Sequentially, two lipid compositions were used to develop the NLCs. Formulations were then characterized and subjected to in vitro release and permeation tests on porcine skin. The NLCs containing oleic acid effectively controlled IBR release over 24 h compared to the NLCs composed of pomegranate seed oil. Furthermore, the nanoparticles acted as permeation enhancers, increasing the fluidity of the lipids in the stratum corneum, as determined by EPR spectroscopy, which stimulated the IBR penetration more profoundly into the skin. However, the NLCs composition also influenced the permeation promotion factor. Thus, these findings emphasize the importance of the composition of NLCs in controlling and increasing the skin penetration of IBR and pave the way for future advances in melanoma therapy.

Effective Targeting of Melanoma Cells by Combination of Mcl-1 and Bcl-2/Bcl-xL/Bcl-w Inhibitors.

Recent advances in melanoma therapy have significantly improved the prognosis of metastasized melanoma. However, large therapeutic gaps remain that need to be closed by new strategies. Antiapoptotic Bcl-2 proteins critically contribute to apoptosis deficiency and therapy resistance. They can be targeted by BH3 mimetics, small molecule antagonists that mimic the Bcl-2 homology domain 3 (BH3) of proapoptotic BH3-only proteins. By applying in vitro experiments, we aimed to obtain an overview of the possible suitability of BH3 mimetics for future melanoma therapy. Thus, we investigated the effects of ABT-737 and ABT-263, which target Bcl-2, Bcl-xL and Bcl-w as well as the Bcl-2-selective ABT-199 and the Mcl-1-selective S63845, in a panel of four BRAF-mutated and BRAF-WT melanoma cell lines. None of the inhibitors showed significant effectiveness when used alone; however, combination of S63845 with each one of the three ABTs almost completely abolished melanoma cell survival and induced apoptosis in up to 50-90% of the cells. Special emphasis was placed here on the understanding of the downstream pathways involved, which may allow improved applications of these strategies. Thus, cell death induction was correlated with caspase activation, loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, phosphorylation of histone H2AX, and ROS production. Caspase dependency was demonstrated by a caspase inhibitor, which blocked all effects. Upregulation of Mcl-1, induced by S63845 itself, as reported previously, was blocked by the combinations. Indeed, Mcl-1, as well as XIAP (X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis), were strongly downregulated by combination treatments. These findings demonstrate that melanoma cells can be efficiently targeted by BH3 mimetics, but the right combinations have to be selected. The observed pronounced activation of apoptosis pathways demonstrates the decisive role of apoptosis in the loss of cell viability by BH3 mimetics.

Clinical and Histological Response to Talimogene Laherparepvec Therapy in Advanced Melanoma: Impact on Overall Survival.

Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) is an FDA-approved oncolytic herpesvirus therapy used for unresectable stage IIIB through IV metastatic melanoma. However, the correlation between clinical complete response (cCR) and pathologic complete response (pCR) in patients treated with T-VEC is understudied. We conducted a retrospective study from a prospectively maintained IRB-approved melanoma single-center database in patients treated with T-VEC from October 2015 to April 2022. Patients were categorized into 3 groups: cCR with pCR, cCR without pCR, and less than cCR. The primary endpoint was overall survival. We used descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests to compare key covariates among exposure groups. We used survival analysis to compare survival curves and reported hazard ratio of death (95% CI) across exposure groups. We included 116 patients with a median overall survival (interquartile range) of 22.7 (14.8-39.3) months. The majority were men (69%) and White (97.4%), with a median age of 74.5 years. More than half of patients (n = 60, 51.6%) achieved cCR. Distribution among the groups was as follows: cCR with pCR (35.3%), cCR without pCR (16.3%), and less than cCR (48.4%). Median overall survival time (interquartile range) was 26.5 (18.6-36.0) months for cCR with pCR, 22.7 (14.4-35.5) months for cCR without pCR, and 17.8 (9.2-47.0) months for less than cCR (log-rank p value = 0.0033). Patients achieving cCR with pCR after T-VEC therapy have the most favorable overall survival outcomes, whereas those achieving cCR without pCR have inferior survival and those achieving less than cCR have the poorest overall survival outcomes. These findings emphasize the importance of histological confirmation and provide insights for optimizing T-VEC therapy in patients with advanced melanoma.

Discussion.

Discussion.

Nivolumab and Relatlimab (Opdualag)


 CADTH recommends that Opdualag be reimbursed for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients 12 years of age or older with unresectable or metastatic melanoma who have not received prior systemic therapy for unresectable or metastatic melanoma if certain conditions are met.
 Opdualag should only be covered to treat patients aged 12 years or older who have a histologically confirmed diagnosis of unresectable stage III or stage IV (metastatic) melanoma and have not received prior systemic therapy for advanced melanoma. Patients should be in relatively good health (i.e., have a good performance status, as determined by a specialist).
 Patients who had prior adjuvant or neoadjuvant anti–programmed death-1 (PD-1) or anti–cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) therapy if the therapy was completed at least 6 months before the date of recurrence are eligible for reimbursement. Opdualag should not be reimbursed in patients with active brain metastases, uveal melanoma, and active autoimmune disease. Opdualag should only be reimbursed if the price of Opdualag is reduced. The feasibility of adoption of Opdualag must also be addressed.

Long-term survival with systemic therapy in the last decade: Can melanoma be cured?

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been shown to prolong survival of patients with several types of cancer, and the finding was first established in melanoma. Previously, systemic therapy for advanced melanoma aimed only at tumor control and palliation of symptoms. However, in recent years, some patients who received systemic therapy have achieved a complete response and survived without continuous treatment for more than several years. This review discusses the long-term survival rates achieved with currently used systemic therapies and their future perspectives. Long-term survival is currently most likely to be achieved with the use of the standard-dose combination of nivolumab plus ipilimumab, however, this regimen is associated with a high frequency of serious or persistent immune-related adverse events. Several new anti-PD-1-based combination therapies with a better risk-benefit balance are currently under development. Although the acral and mucosal subtypes tend to be less responsive to immune checkpoint inhibitors, anti-PD-1-based combination therapy should continue to be investigated for these subtypes owing to its potential for better long-term survival. With the development of efficacious immunotherapy and targeted therapy, it is important to determine the optimal duration of systemic therapy to avoid unnecessary health and financial burdens as well as to improve efforts to support long-term cancer survivors. As the goal of systemic therapy shifts from tumor control to long-term survival, in future clinical trials, long-term clinical outcomes should be evaluated to assess the benefits of novel agents.

Therapeutic Strategies in BRAF V600 Wild-Type Cutaneous Melanoma.

There have been many recent advances in melanoma therapy. While 50% of melanomas have a BRAF mutation and are a target for BRAF inhibitors, the remaining 50% are BRAF wild-type. Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-1, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4) and lymphocyte activated gene-3 (Lag-3) are all approved for the treatment of patients with advanced BRAF wild-type melanoma; however, treatment of this patient population following initial immune checkpoint blockade is a current therapeutic challenge given the lack of other efficacious options. Here, we briefly review available US FDA-approved therapies for BRAF wild-type melanoma and focus on developing treatment avenues for this heterogeneous group of patients. We review the basics of genomic features of both BRAF mutant and BRAF wild-type melanoma as well as efforts underway to develop new targeted therapies involving the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway for patients with BRAF wild-type tumors. We then focus on novel immunotherapies, including developing checkpoint inhibitors and agonists, cytokine therapies, oncolytic viruses and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, all of which represent potential therapeutic avenues for patients with BRAF wild-type melanoma who progress on currently approved immune checkpoint inhibitors.

A Review of Current and Pipeline Drugs for Treatment of Melanoma.

Malignant melanoma is the most aggressive form of skin cancer. Standard treatment options include surgery, radiation therapy, systemic chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. Combining these modalities often yields better responses. Surgery is suitable for localized cases, sometimes involving lymph node dissection and biopsy, to assess the spread of the disease. Radiation therapy may be sometimes used as a standalone treatment or following surgical excision. Systemic chemotherapy, while having low response rates, is utilized as part of combination treatments or when other methods fail. The development of resistance to systemic chemotherapies and associated side effects have prompted further research and clinical trials for novel approaches. In the case of advanced-stage melanoma, a comprehensive approach may be necessary, incorporating targeted therapies and immunotherapies that demonstrate significant antitumor activity. Targeted therapies, including inhibitors targeting BRAF, MEK, c-KIT, and NRAS, are designed to block the specific molecules responsible for tumor growth. These therapies show promise, particularly in patients with corresponding mutations. Combination therapy, including BRAF and MEK inhibitors, has been evidenced to improve progression-free survival; however, concerns about resistance and cutaneous toxicities highlight the need for close monitoring. Immunotherapies, leveraging tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and CAR T cells, enhance immune responses. Lifileucel, an FDA-approved tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy, has demonstrated improved response rates in advanced-stage melanoma. Ongoing trials continue to explore the efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy for advanced melanoma. Checkpoint inhibitors targeting CTLA-4 and PD-1 have enhanced outcomes. Emerging IL-2 therapies boost dendritic cells, enhancing anticancer immunity. Oncolytic virus therapy, approved for advanced melanoma, augments treatment efficacy in combination approaches. While immunotherapy has significantly advanced melanoma treatment, its success varies, prompting research into new drugs and factors influencing outcomes. This review provides insights into current melanoma treatments and recent therapeutic advances.

Increased Thyroidal Activity on Routine FDG-PET/CT after Combination Immune Checkpoint Inhibition: Temporal Associations with Clinical and Biochemical Thyroiditis.

FDG-PET/CT used for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) response assessment can incidentally identify immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including thyroiditis. This study aimed to correlate the time course of FDG-PET/CT evidence of thyroiditis with clinical and biochemical evolution of thyroid dysfunction. A retrospective review was performed by two independent blinded nuclear medicine physicians (NMPs) of thyroidal FDG uptake in 127 patients who underwent PET/CT between January 2016 and January 2019 at baseline and during treatment monitoring of combination ICI therapy for advanced melanoma. Interobserver agreement was assessed and FDG-PET/CT performance defined by a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve using thyroid function tests (TFTs) as the standard of truth. Thyroid maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and its temporal changes with respect to the longitudinal biochemistry were serially recorded. At a median of 3 weeks after commencing ICI, 43/127 (34%) had a diagnosis of thyroiditis established by abnormal TFTs. FDG-PET/CT was performed at baseline and at a median of 11 weeks (range 3-32) following the start of therapy. ROC analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.87 (95% CI 0.80, 0.94) for FDG-PET/CT for detection of thyroiditis with a positive predictive value of 93%. Among patients with biochemical evidence of thyroiditis, those with a positive FDG-PET/CT were more likely to develop overt hypothyroidism (77% versus 35%, p < 0.01). In the evaluation of the index test, there was an almost perfect interobserver agreement between NMPs of 93.7% (95% CI 89.4-98.0), kappa 0.83. Increased metabolic activity of the thyroid on routine FDG-PET/CT performed for tumoral response of patients undergoing ICI therapy is generally detected well after routine biochemical diagnosis. Elevation of FDG uptake in the thyroid is predictive of overt clinical hypothyroidism and suggests that an ongoing robust inflammatory response beyond the initial thyrotoxic phase may be indicative of thyroid destruction.

Systemic therapy timing and use in patients with advanced melanoma at the end of life: A retrospective cohort study.

Novel systemic therapies for advanced melanoma improve survival, but carry potential serious side effects and high costs. This study aimed to assess the timing and use of systemic therapies in the months before death. Patients diagnosed with advanced melanoma (July 2017-June 2020) who died before July 2020 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. We evaluated the timing of systemic therapies within 30 days and 3 months before death, and studied patient and tumor characteristics associated with systemic therapy use between diagnosis and death. Out of 1097 patients 68% received systemic therapy. Almost 25% and 10% started a new therapy within 90 days and within 30 days before death, respectively. Female sex, elevated LDH, BRAF mutation, poor ECOG performance status (≥3), and high comorbidity index reduced the odds of receiving immune therapy. Poor performance status and high comorbidity decreased the odds for both therapies. A considerable number of patients started systemic therapy shortly before death, emphasizing the importance of considering potential benefits and drawbacks through shared decision-making.

Real-world outcomes with immuno-oncology therapies in advanced melanoma: final results of the OPTIMIzE registry study.

Aim: The OPTIMIzE registry study evaluated real-world outcomes in patients with advanced melanoma receiving immuno-oncology therapies. Materials and methods: Data were collected for patients treated with anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) monotherapy (nivolumab or pembrolizumab; n=147) or nivolumab plus ipilimumab (n=81) from 2015-2017 and followed for ≥3years. Results: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus anti-PD-1 monotherapy was associated with a nonsignificantly lower risk of death (adjusted HR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.54-1.28; p=0.41), higher disease control rate (72vs 56%; p=0.04), and stable quality of life, but more grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (54vs 26%; p<0.0001). Conclusion: These results support the use of immuno-oncology therapy in advanced melanoma.

Long-term outcomes and persistent toxicities following BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy for advanced melanoma

BackgroundRecent studies have shown that approximately 20% of patients have 4–5 year progression free survival (PFS) on BRAF/MEK inhibitors. The long-term safety and efficacy in these patients with more durable responses have not been studied. MethodsThis retrospective multicenter cohort study assessed response, progression, and adverse events in patients from eight institutions in four countries with >4-year PFS following BRAF/MEK inhibitors. ResultsAmong 146 patients, 112 (76.7%) remained progression-free at median follow-up of 7.8 years from treatment start; 131 (89.7%) were alive. Among progressors (n = 34), 21 (62%) were on treatment at progression. Among those who discontinued treatment for reasons other than progression (toxicity, preference, etc.) (n = 68, with median 49 months treatment duration), 13 (19%) progressed (median 15.3 months from treatment cessation to progression). Surgery or radiation for single-organ progression resulted in durable benefit in 11 of 22 patients (50%). Subsequent systemic therapy included immune therapy (24% responded) and BRAF/MEK rechallenge (56% responded). Thirteen (8.9%) patients had ongoing toxicities at last follow-up, 10 (77%) of which remained on active treatment; all cardiac adverse events had resolved (n = 9). Twenty-four (16.4%) patients developed any new primary cancer, and 28 (19%) patients experienced other major health events. ConclusionsOver 75% of patients with 4-year PFS from BRAF/MEK inhibitors had continued durable antitumor responses after nearly 8-year median follow-up, with similar results in patients who discontinued therapy for reasons other than progression. Long-term toxicities were uncommon and low-grade. These findings highlight the often-favourable outcomes in patients with extended benefit from BRAF/MEK inhibitors.

Efficacy of salvage therapies for advanced acral melanoma after anti-PD-1 monotherapy failure: a multicenter retrospective study of 108 Japanese patients.

Anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) monotherapy is one of the standard systemic therapies for advanced melanoma; however, the efficacy of salvage systemic therapies after PD-1 monotherapy failure (PD-1 MF), particularly in acral melanoma (AM), the main clinical melanoma type in Japanese patients, is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of salvage systemic therapies in Japanese patients with AM after PD-1 MF. The study included 108 patients with advanced AM (palm and sole, 72; nail apparatus, 36) who underwent salvage systemic therapy at 24 Japanese institutions. We mainly assessed the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Thirty-six (33%) patients received ipilimumab, 23 (21%) received nivolumab and ipilimumab (nivo/ipi), 10 (9%) received cytotoxic chemotherapy, 4 (4%) received BRAF and MEK inhibitors (BRAFi/MEKi), and the remaining 35 (32%) continued with PD-1 monotherapy after disease progression. The ORRs in the ipilimumab, nivo/ipi, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and BRAFi/MEKi groups were 8, 17, 0, and 100%, respectively. The nivo/ipi group showed the longest OS (median, 18.9 months); however, differences in ORR, PFS, and OS between the groups were insignificant. The OS in the nivo/ipi group was higher in the palm and sole groups than in the nail apparatus group (median: not reached vs. 8.7 months, p < 0.001). Cox multivariate analysis demonstrated that nail apparatus melanoma independently predicted unfavorable PFS and OS (p = 0.006 and 0.001). The total OS (from PD-1 monotherapy initiation to death/last follow-up) was insignificant between the groups. Nivo/ipi was not more effective than cytotoxic chemotherapy and ipilimumab after PD-1 MF in patients with advanced AM. The prognosis after PD-1 MF would be poorer for nail apparatus melanoma than for palm and sole melanoma.

Эффективность тройной комбинации в терапии распространенной меланомы

Skin melanoma is one of the most aggressive malignant forms of neoplasms, difficult to treat, has a high potential for growth and dissemination, as well as regional and widespread metastasis. Over the past few years, the issues of efficacy and safety of a number of drugs used to treat patients both in mono mode and in combination therapy regimens have been actively discussed. One notable study on the efficacy of a new drug combination is IMspire150. The use of a triple combination (atezolizumab, vemurafenib, cobimetinib) in the first line of therapy for advanced melanoma with a positive BRAF V600 mutation is presented in this clinical case.

Five-year survival outcomes in patients with melanoma with complete response to immunotherapy who discontinue therapy.

e21503 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for advanced melanoma in the first-line setting often results in durable responses and prolonged overall survival (OS) after achieving a complete response (CR). While generally well-tolerated, there are financial toxicities and treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) associated with ICI use. There are limited data to inform the optimal duration of therapy after CR, and how specific patient factors may lead to variable OS in patients (pts) with CR. Methods: Pts with locally advanced stage III or stage IV melanoma who started first-line ICI therapy with pembrolizumab, nivolumab, or ipilimumab/nivolumab (ipi/nivo) and achieved CR were identified at a single institution under an Institutional Review Board approved protocol. Pts were only included in the sample if they had initiated treatment by 2013 and discontinued therapy by February of 2021 and had documented follow-up at least 1 year after discontinuing ICI therapy. Recurrence rates were determined by the presence of any recurrence after CR. Pts were analyzed by baseline stage (III vs IV), BRAF status, use of steroids for TRAEs, time from treatment start to CR, and total duration of therapy. OS was determined by time from treatment start to death or date of last follow-up. Results: 78 Pts with CRs from ICI therapy who discontinued treatment were identified at the University of Pennsylvania. Median follow-up time was 63 months from ICI treatment start. Median age at treatment start was 65 years (range 33-94). 51 Pts (68%) had an ECOG performance status (PS) of 0 vs 24 (32%) with ECOG PS of 1-2. 21 Pts (27%) had locally advanced stage III and 57 (73%) had stage IV disease. Of stage IV pts, 8 were M1a, 16 M1b, 22 M1c, and 11 M1d. 61 (78%) pts were treated with pembrolizumab, 5 (6%) nivolumab, 12 (15%) ipi/nivo. 34 pts (44%) were treated with steroids for TRAEs. Of the 78 total pts, 13 (16.7%) developed a recurrence after stopping treatment. The median time to recurrence was 57 months (range 9-110). Melanoma specific survival was 96%. Of the pts with recurrence, 3 died of melanoma, 9 are disease free after additional local and/or systemic treatment and one patient is alive with disease. There was no significant difference ( p &lt; 0.05) in OS based on baseline stage, BRAF status, or use of steroids for TRAEs. Pts were treated for a median of 6 months (range 1 day to 24 months). Conclusions: With over 5 years median follow-up time, the majority of pts with advanced melanoma who attain a CR from first-line ICI therapy remain disease free after treatment discontinuation. Patient factors including stage at treatment initiation, BRAF status, and steroid usage during treatment were not associated with significant variation in OS in this cohort. Most pts with recurrences remain disease free after additional local and/or systemic treatment. Few melanoma specific deaths occurred in pts with a CR to ICI who discontinued treatment.

Abstract 5344: Novel melanoma leads demonstrate efficacy in A375 xenograft model in nude mice

Abstract The purpose of this study was to evaluate efficacy of novel anti-melanoma leads for in vivo efficacy. Despite the recent advances in melanoma therapy, the need for new targets and novel approaches to therapy is urgent. We previously reported novel melanoma leads, 2155-14 and 2155-18, that work via binding and downregulating spliceosomal proteins hnRNPH1 and H2. To determine the therapeutic potential of these compounds we tested them in A375 cell-line derived xenograft in nu/nu mice. For determination of 2155-14 and 2155-18 potency in vivo, nude mice were inoculated subcutaneously with A375 cell line and tumors were allowed to reach 100mm3. Animals were then randomized into four groups to receive subcutaneous administration of vehicle, 10mg/kg vemurafenib, and 25mg/kg 2155-14 and 2155-18 three times per week for 15 days. The result revealed that both 2155-14 and 2155-18 significantly decreased the growth of A375 tumors, which was comparable to vemurafenib. These results are well correlated with the exposure of leads in plasma. In summary, these results suggest a therapeutic potential of targeting spliceosomal proteins hnRNPH1 and H2 and support potential of 2155-14 and 2155-18 as drug candidates for treatment of melanoma. Keywords: Melanoma, drug discovery, A375, xenograft. Citation Format: Dmitriy Minond, Sadeeshkumar Velayutham. Novel melanoma leads demonstrate efficacy in A375 xenograft model in nude mice. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 5344.

HSR23-110: Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI) Treatment After Progression on Anti–PD-1 Therapy in Advanced Melanoma: A Systematic Review of the Literature

"HSR23-110: Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI) Treatment After Progression on Anti–PD-1 Therapy in Advanced Melanoma: A Systematic Review of the Literature" published on 31 Mar 2023 by National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

More than Just Skin-Deep: A Review of Imaging's Role in Guiding CAR T-Cell Therapy for Advanced Melanoma.

Advanced melanoma is one of the deadliest cancers, owing to its invasiveness and its propensity to develop resistance to therapy. Surgery remains the first-line treatment for early-stage tumors but is often not an option for advanced-stage melanoma. Chemotherapy carries a poor prognosis, and despite advances in targeted therapy, the cancer can develop resistance. CAR T-cell therapy has demonstrated great success against hematological cancers, and clinical trials are deploying it against advanced melanoma. Though melanoma remains a challenging disease to treat, radiology will play an increasing role in monitoring both the CAR T-cells and response to therapy. We review the current imaging techniques for advanced melanoma, as well as novel PET tracers and radiomics, in order to guide CAR T-cell therapy and manage potential adverse events.

Time interval from primary melanoma to first distant recurrence in relation to patient outcomes in advanced melanoma.

Since the introduction of BRAF(/MEK) inhibition and immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI), the prognosis of advanced melanoma has greatly improved. Melanoma is known for its remarkably long time to first distant recurrence (TFDR), which can be decades in some patients and is partly attributed to immune-surveillance. We investigated the relationship between TFDR and patient outcomes after systemic treatment for advanced melanoma. We selected patients undergoing first-line systemic therapy for advanced melanoma from the nationwide Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry. The association between TFDR and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed by Cox proportional hazard regression models. The TFDR was modeled categorically, linearly, and flexibly using restricted cubic splines. Patients received anti-PD-1-based treatment (n=1844) or BRAF(/MEK) inhibition (n=1618). For ICI-treated patients with a TFDR <2 years, median OS was 25.0months, compared to 37.3months for a TFDR >5 years (P= .014). Patients treated with BRAF(/MEK) inhibition with a longer TFDR also had a significantly longer median OS (8.6months for TFDR <2 years compared to 11.1months for >5 years, P= .004). The hazard of dying rapidly decreased with increasing TFDR until approximately 5 years (HR 0.87), after which the hazard of dying further decreased with increasing TFDR, but less strongly (HR 0.82 for a TFDR of 10 years and HR 0.79 for a TFDR of 15 years). Results were similar when stratifying for type of treatment. Advanced melanoma patients with longer TFDR have a prolonged PFS and OS, irrespective of being treated with first-line ICI or targeted therapy.

Long-term outcomes of margin-controlled excision for eyelid melanoma.

To provide evidence for long-term outcomes for margin-controlled excision of eyelid melanoma. Retrospective single-centre observational case series of patients treated for eyelid melanoma between 2007 and 2016, with a minimum of 5-year follow-up. Tumour excision involved rush-paraffin en face horizontal sections and delayed repair (Slow Mohs; SM). Twenty-two cases were seen with a survival of 91% (two deaths from nodular and lentigo maligna melanoma) and seven with melanoma in situ (MIS). Invasive melanoma includes eight lentigo maligna melanoma, four nodular, two amelanotic and one desmoplastic. Mean Breslow thickness was 6 mm for invasive (range 0.5-26). Mean excision margin for MIS was 3 mm (range 2-5 mm) and for invasive was 5 mm (range 2-10). Further excisions were performed in nine (41%); two went on to recur. Local recurrence was 36%; six invasive (27%) at a mean of 24 months (range 1.5-5 years) and two for MIS at a mean of 15 months (range 1-1.5 years). Imaging occurred for suspected advanced disease. Sentinel node biopsy was not performed. Advanced melanoma therapy was performed in two cases. No vitamin D testing occurred. Survival rates are in line with 90% overall survival in the UK. Prescriptive excision margins are not applicable in the periocular region and margin-controlled excision with a delayed repair is recommended, but patients need to know further excision may be needed to obtain clearance. Evidence recommending vitamin D therapy needs to be put into clinical practice. In addition, upstaging of MIS occurred advocating excision rather than observation of MIS. More studies are needed to determine the best management of eyelid melanoma.