TECHNOLOGY AND CULTURE Book Reviews 169 and little commitment to rural development, to American agricultural economics programs, where both theory and methodology for pur suing applied work are steeped in simplifications inappropriate to contemporary China. All in all, Stress’s accomplishment is superb. His work is thoroughly documented with extensive notes and an excellent bibliography of Chinese- and English-language sources. Bruce Stone Mr. Stone is the coordinator for China research at the International Food Policy Research Institute in Washington, D.C., where he investigates economic policy impli cations of technical change in agricultural supply and demand development. He co authored Food Production in the People's Republic ofChina with Anthony Tang and recently edited Fertilizer Pricing Policy in Bangladesh. Another Icarus: Percy Pilcher and the Quest for Flight. By Philip Jarrett. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1987. Pp. xi + 226; illustrations, notes, appendixes, index. $22.50. Over the last two decades we have learned about the early years of heavier-than-air flight and the major personalities who played out the technological drama that climaxed with the invention of the airplane. Charles H. Gibbs-Smith and Tom D. Crouch, especially, have studied the careers of Otto Lilienthal, Octave Chanute, Samuel P. Langley, the Wrights, and others, placing them within the context of late-19thcentury science and engineering. Together, these experimenters formed what Crouch identifies as a loosely knit transatlantic “aero nautical community” and generated a climate conducive to the ulti mate solution of what was widely regarded as the “problem of the century.” Less well known than some of the others within this com munity was Percy Pilcher, a young English engineer who was drawn to aeronautics in the 1890s and built and flew gliders until his tragic death in 1899. In Another Icarus, Philip Jarrett has provided the most comprehen sive study of Pilcher’s life and career to date. Born in 1867, Pilcher served for a time in the Royal Navy before working in the engineering department of a shipbuilder and lecturing at Glasgow University. Like many others, Pilcher marveled at the photographs of the gliding flights of Otto Lilienthal. In 1895, he visited Lilienthal to observe his ex periments and apparently established a regular correspondence with the German master. This turned out to be a fateful encounter, because it led Pilcher to emulate Lilienthal’s hang gliders and his acrobatic approach to the vexatious problem of in-flight control. Pilcher constructed his first glider in Scotland shortly after meeting Lilienthal and possibly flew for the first time in October 1895. Pilcher’s gliders, similar in appearance and size to Lilienthal’s, were mono 170 Book Reviews TECHNOLOGY AND CULTURE planes with folding, fabric-covered wings reinforced by bamboo ribs radiating from a king post on each side and braced with numerous wires. Pilcher, however, btted his later gliders with wheeled under carriages, which helped absorb the shock of landing and eased the task of moving the machines about on the ground. By 1898, Pilcher had built and flown an improved glider, named the Hawk, and he was developing designs for a triplane powered by a small two-cylinder engine. Throughout, he had the encouragement and assistance of his sister Ella. Pilcher persisted in his conviction that aerodynamic control surfaces were unnecessary: this, of course, greatly circumscribed his work and made it unlikely that he could have succeeded with a larger powered machine. However, he never had to face that reality, for the tail of the Hawk collapsed in midair during a routine flight at Stanford Hall in 1899. Pilcher died a few days later from the injuries sustained in the crash. Another Icarus is likely to be considered the definitive biography of Percy Pilcher. Jarrett has pieced together Pilcher’s story despite the dearth of primary sources—Pilcher was a “reluctant correspondent” (p. ix) and did not leave behind a body of letters or other unpublished materials. Further, Jarrett provides a balanced assessment of Pilcher’s accomplishments, stressing that he “made no revolutionary scientific or technical contributions to the advancement ofaeronautics” (p. 147). Yet Pilcher does deserve such extended treatment, because he was, as Jarrett writes, “the first man in Britain to design, construct, and...
Read full abstract