Advanced Squamous Cell Lung Cancer Research Articles

Abstract 4553: DXC004A, a novel EGFR antibody-tubulysin analog conjugate demonstrated potential to broaden therapeutic opportunities for non-small cell lung cancer

Abstract EGFR is a member of the epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) family, and the over-expression of EGFR plays an important role in the growth and progression of various tumors, including non-small cell lung cancer. Monoclonal EGFR antibodies, such as cetuximab and panitumumab, have proven efficacy in various types of cancer. However, treatment with the anti-EGFR agents can be associated with toxicities of the skin, nails, hair, and eyes. Nimotuzumab (Nimo) is the first humanized monoclonal antibody targeting EGFR and has been granted approval for use in squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (SCCHN), glioma and nasopharyngeal cancer in different countries. In contrast to cetuximab, Nimotuzumab is distinguished by achieving higher or similar complete remission rate (CRR) or overall remission rate (ORR) of the primary tumor in clinical applications but much less toxicity, resulting in a better safety profile, which has been attributed to its about 10-fold lower affinity. Paclitaxel combined with cisplatin is the first-line chemotherapy regimen for non-small cell lung cancer. A phase 2 clinical trial has confirmed that Nimotuzumab combined with concurrent chemoradiation therapy (radiation concurrent with docetaxel and cisplatin, CCRT) was well tolerated for locally advanced squamous cell lung cancer. However, the combination strategy of Nimo-CCRT has only demonstrated similar OS and PFS to those in the CCRT group. DXC004A is an ADC drug targeting EGFR, in which a Nimotuzumab derivative and a Tubulysin B analog is conjugated by a functional linker. DXC004A is in phase I clinical trial and has demonstrated clinical activity in advanced non-small cell lung cancers and good tolerability. In vitro and in vivo results had confirmed that DXC004A monotherapy had better anti-tumor activity than the combination of Nimotuzumab and Tubulysin analog in HCC827 cell lines with high EGFR expression. Meanwhile, a single injection of low-dose DXC004 (2.5 mg/kg) in HCC827 xenograft model showed very good durable anti-tumor effect. Moreover, the combination of DXC004A with Cisplatin exhibited significantly better activities than that of Nimo-CCRT combination, DXC004A or cisplatin alone, in vitro and in vivo, which might solve the predicament of poor efficacy of Nimo-CCRT combination therapy. This synergy results suggested that DXC004A plus cisplatin would possibly be a new adjuvant therapy for non-small cell lung cancer in further clinical studies. Citation Format: Xiaobo Cai, Min Cao, Huihui Guo, Qingliang Yang, Yongxiang Chen, Xiangfei Kong, Yong Du, Zhicang Ye, Zhixiang Guo, Lingli Zhang, Lu Bai, Junxiang Jia, Yunxia Zheng, Wei Zheng, Jun Zheng, Wenjun Li, Yuanyuan Huang, Zhongliang Fan, Binbin Chen, Meng Dai, Robert Y. Zhao. DXC004A, a novel EGFR antibody-tubulysin analog conjugate demonstrated potential to broaden therapeutic opportunities for non-small cell lung cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 4553.

Cost-effectiveness of immunotherapies for advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review

BackgroundThere are differences in the pharmacoeconomics of Immune checkpoint blocking (ICB) therapies for the treatment of lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). However, no corresponding review studies have fully discussed the cost-effectiveness of ICBs in treating LSCC. The aim of this paper is to systematically review and evaluate all available pharmacoeconomic studies of ICBs for LSCC.MethodThe inclusion criteria were based on the population, intervention, comparator, outcomes, and study designs. An electronic search was conducted by June 2023, and the following databases were used: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Search keywords included ‘Carcinoma’, Non-Small-Cell Lung’, ‘Immunotherapy’, and ‘Economics, Medical’. The primary outcome was the cost-effectiveness analysis of ICB therapy in LSCC patients. Drummond Checklist was used to assess quality problems and possible bias in the study design of included pharmacoeconomic studies.ResultsThis review searched 15 articles on the economic evaluation of ICB treatment for LSCC. After a qualitative review of 15 studies, we concluded that nivolumab is more cost-effective as a monotherapy than chemotherapy alone. In the combination regimen, pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy appears to be the most cost-effective option at present, but for Chinese payers with LSCC, locally developed treatments such as sintilimab or toripalimab in combination with chemotherapy are more cost-effective.DiscussionThe inclusion of economic evaluation has heterogeneity in research design and outcomes, which can only support qualitative synthesis. Therefore, The results of this paper need to be treated with caution. For the Chinese market, instead of imported drugs, the possible cost-effectiveness of locally developed ICB therapies should be the focus of future research.

62P First-line (1L) camrelizumab plus chemotherapy (chemo) for advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer (sqNSCLC): 4-yr update from the phase III CameL-sq trial

62P First-line (1L) camrelizumab plus chemotherapy (chemo) for advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer (sqNSCLC): 4-yr update from the phase III CameL-sq trial

Predicting radiation pneumonitis in lung cancer: a EUD-based machine learning approach for volumetric modulated arc therapy patients.

This study aims to develop an optimal machine learning model that uses lung equivalent uniform dose (lung EUD to predict radiation pneumonitis (RP) occurrence in lung cancer patients treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). We analyzed a cohort of 77 patients diagnosed with locally advanced squamous cell lung cancer (LASCLC) receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy with VMAT. Patients were categorized based on the onset of grade II or higher radiation pneumonitis (RP 2+). Dose volume histogram data, extracted from the treatment planning system, were used to compute the lung EUD values for both groups using a specialized numerical analysis code. We identified the parameter α, representing the most significant relative difference in lung EUD between the two groups. The predictive potential of variables for RP2+, including physical dose metrics, lung EUD, normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) from the Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) model, and lung EUD-calibrated NTCP for affected and whole lung, underwent both univariate and multivariate analyses. Relevant variables were then employed as inputs for machine learning models: multiple logistic regression (MLR), support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), and K-nearest neighbor (KNN). Each model's performance was gauged using the area under the curve (AUC), determining the best-performing model. The optimal α-value for lung EUD was 0.3, maximizing the relative lung EUD difference between the RP 2+ and non-RP 2+ groups. A strong correlation coefficient of 0.929 (P< 0.01) was observed between lung EUD (α = 0.3) and physical dose metrics. When examining predictive capabilities, lung EUD-based NTCP for the affected lung (AUC: 0.862) and whole lung (AUC: 0.815) surpassed LKB-based NTCP for the respective lungs. The decision tree (DT) model using lung EUD-based predictors emerged as the superior model, achieving an AUC of 0.98 in both training and validation datasets. The likelihood of developing RP 2+ has shown a significant correlation with the advancements in RT technology. From traditional 3-D conformal RT, lung cancer treatment methodologies have transitioned to sophisticated techniques like static IMRT. Accurately deriving such a dose-effect relationship through NTCP modeling of RP incidence is statistically challenging due to the increased number of degrees-of-freedom. To the best of our knowledge, many studies have not clarified the rationale behind setting the α-value to 0.99 or 1, despite the closely aligned calculated lung EUD and lung mean dose MLD. Perfect independence among variables is rarely achievable in real-world scenarios. Four prominent machine learning algorithms were used to devise our prediction models. The inclusion of lung EUD-based factors substantially enhanced their predictive performance for RP 2+. Our results advocate for the decision tree model with lung EUD-based predictors as the optimal prediction tool for VMAT-treated lung cancer patients. Which could replace conventional dosimetric parameters, potentially simplifying complex neural network structures in prediction models.

New treatment options in advanced squamous cell lung cancer: new drugs, molecular targets and immunotherapy

New treatment options in advanced squamous cell lung cancer: new drugs, molecular targets and immunotherapy

A Case of Advanced Squamous Cell Lung Cancer with Hemodialysis That Responded to Carboplatin and Nab-paclitaxel Combination Therapy After Progression on Pembrolizumab

A Case of Advanced Squamous Cell Lung Cancer with Hemodialysis That Responded to Carboplatin and Nab-paclitaxel Combination Therapy After Progression on Pembrolizumab

Real-World Treatment Outcomes and Safety of Afatinib in Advanced Squamous Cell Lung Cancer Progressed after Platinum-Based Doublet Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy (SPACE Study)

Real-World Treatment Outcomes and Safety of Afatinib in Advanced Squamous Cell Lung Cancer Progressed after Platinum-Based Doublet Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy (SPACE Study)

MO57-5 Multicenter retrospective study to evaluate necitumumab plus CDDP/GEM after ICIs in advanced squamous-cell lung cancer in Japan (NINJA study)

MO57-5 Multicenter retrospective study to evaluate necitumumab plus CDDP/GEM after ICIs in advanced squamous-cell lung cancer in Japan (NINJA study)

539P Biomarker analysis of IBI110 (anti-LAG-3 mAb) in combination with sintilimab (anti-PD-1 mAb) and chemotherapy as 1L treatment for advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer (sqNSCLC)

539P Biomarker analysis of IBI110 (anti-LAG-3 mAb) in combination with sintilimab (anti-PD-1 mAb) and chemotherapy as 1L treatment for advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer (sqNSCLC)

540P Phase III study of serplulimab plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer: ASTRUM-004 Asian subgroup

540P Phase III study of serplulimab plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer: ASTRUM-004 Asian subgroup

Pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy in patients with advanced squamous cell lung cancer — clinical trials and real-world data

Pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy in patients with advanced squamous cell lung cancer — clinical trials and real-world data

Cost-effectiveness of camrelizumab plus chemotherapy in advanced squamous non-small-cell lung cancer.

Objectives: A cost-effectivenessstudyof camrelizumab plus chemotherapy for advanced squamous non-small-cell lung cancerin China was conducted versus chemotherapy alone. Methods: Survival data were derived from CameL-Sq. Cost-effectiveness is indicated by an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) less than the willingness-to-pay threshold. The partitioned survival model stability was assessed by sensitivity analyses. Results: With camrelizumab plus chemotherapy, quality-adjusted life years increased by 0.83, and cost increased by $21,259/patient versus chemotherapy. The ICER was $25,674/quality-adjusted life year. The probability of cost-effectiveness was >90% regardless of PD-L1 expression level. Regardless of the variation in each parameter across a wide range, the ICER never transcended the willingness to pay. Conclusion: Camrelizumab plus chemotherapy is a cost-effective first-line treatment for advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer in China.

Cemiplimab + Chemo Shows Clinical Benefit in Advanced NSCLC

Cemiplimab + Chemo Shows Clinical Benefit in Advanced NSCLC

Phase 2 clinical trial of the proautophagic drug ABTL0812 combined with paclitaxel and carboplatin in first-line patients with advanced squamous non-small cell lung carcinoma.

9059 Background: ABTL0812 induces the inhibition of Akt/mTOR pathway by upregulation of TRIB3 protein, an endogenous Akt inhibitor, and promotes endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. As a result, ABTL0812 induces cytotoxic autophagy that leads to specific death of cancer cells, without affecting non-tumor cell viability. A Phase II clinical trial was designed where ABTL0812 was evaluated in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in first-line patients with advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: ABTL0812 was administered 1300 mg TID orally with 175 mg/m2 paclitaxel and AUC5 carboplatin every 3 weeks, for up to 8 cycles, followed by ABTL0812 as a maintenance until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The study enrolled patients with non-irradiable IIIb stage or stage IV squamous NSCLC. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) by RECIST criteria v.1.1. Secondary endpoints were progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR), safety and tolerability according to CTCAE v4.03, pharmacokinetics (PK) of ABTL0812 enantiomers ((-)-ABTL and (+)-ABTL) and pharmacodynamics assessed by two surrogate blood biomarkers: TRIB3 and CHOP. Results: Forty patients were included; median age was 66.1 years old; 90% men/10% women; 100% ECOG 0-1; 30% current smokers/67.5% former smokers and 37.5% had received prior chemotherapy &gt; 12 months before inclusion. 39 patients had at least 1 adverse event (AE), anemia appeared in 32.5% of the patients (5.0% grade 3), neutropenia in 27.5% (25% grades 3-4) and thrombocytopenia in 17.5% of the patients (2.5% grade 3). For non-hematological AEs, asthenia was reported in 62.5% of the patients (2.5% grade 3); diarrhea in 45% (no grade 3-4) and nausea in 37.5% (5% grades 3-4). Twenty-five patients reach the primary endpoint for efficacy evaluation. ORR was 52.0% (95% CI 34.2-65.9) and 32.0% of the patients had stable disease. Median OS was 22.5 months (10.4-NC), median progression free survival 6.2 months (4.4-8.8), and DOR 5.1 months (3.9-7.4). Area under the curve (µg·h/ml) for (-)-ABTL and (+)-ABTL were 39.0±12.3 and 17.1±6.3 respectively, maximal concentrations (µg/ml) were 6.4±2.6 and 5.1±2.2 and minimum concentrations (µg/ml) 2.2±1.5 and 0.8±1.3. TRIB3 and CHOP PD biomarkers were induced by the treatment. Conclusions: The combination of ABTL0812 with paclitaxel and carboplatin shows survival outcomes that compare favorably with historical controls in squamous-NSCLC with an acceptable safety profile. PK analysis is compatible with drug activity, and pharmacodynamic analysis shows drug engagement. Clinical trial information: NCT03366480 .

Economic Evaluation of Nivolumab Versus Docetaxel for the Treatment of Advanced Squamous and Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer After Prior Chemotherapy in China.

To evaluate the economic value of nivolumab versus docetaxel for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) treatment after platinum-based chemotherapy in adults without epidermal growth factor receptor/anaplastic lymphoma kinase aberrations in China. Partitioned survival models evaluated lifetime costs and benefits of nivolumab versus docetaxel by squamous and non-squamous histologies from a Chinese healthcare payer perspective. Progression-free disease, progressed disease, and death health states were considered over a 20-year time horizon. Clinical data were derived from the CheckMate pivotal Phase III trials (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01642004, NCT01673867, NCT02613507); patient-level survival data were extrapolated using parametric functions. China-specific health state utilities, healthcare resource utilisation, and unit costs were applied. Sensitivity analyses explored uncertainty. Nivolumab resulted in extended survival (1.489 and 1.228 life-years [1.226 and 0.995 discounted]) and quality-adjusted survival benefits (1.034 and 0.833 quality-adjusted life-years) at additional costs of ¥214,353 (US$31,829) and ¥158,993 (US$23,608) versus docetaxel in squamous and non-squamous aNSCLC, respectively. Nivolumab was associated with higher acquisition costs, lower subsequent treatment costs, and lower adverse event management costs than docetaxel in both histologies. Drug acquisition costs, discount rate for outcomes, and average body weight were key model drivers. Stochastic results aligned with the deterministic results. Nivolumab yielded survival and quality-adjusted survival benefits at incremental cost versus docetaxel in aNSCLC. As a traditional healthcare payer perspective was applied, the true economic benefit of nivolumab may be underestimated as not all treatment benefits and costs of relevance to society were considered.

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis of 11 treatment paths, seven first-line and three second-line treatments for Chinese patients with advanced wild-type squamous non-small cell lung cancer: A sequential model.

A total of 11 treatment sequences for advanced wild-type squamous non-small cell lung cancer are recommended by Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology Guidelines, consisting of seven first-line and three second-line treatments. Five of these treatments were newly approved in China between 2021 and 2022. We evaluated the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these strategies from the Chinese healthcare system perspective. Network meta-analysis with non-proportional hazards was used to calculate the relative efficacy between interventions. A sequential model was developed to estimate costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) for treatment sequences with first-line platinum- and paclitaxel-based chemotherapy (SC) with or without nedaplatin, tislelizumab, camrelizumab, sintilimab, sugemalimab or pembrolizumab, followed by second-line docetaxel, tislelizumab or nivolumab. SC and docetaxel were used as comparators for first-line and second-line treatments, respectively. QALY and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were used to evaluate effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, respectively. Cost-effective threshold was set as USD 19,091. Subgroup analysis was conducted to determine the best first-line and second-line therapy. Pembrolizumab + SC, followed by docetaxel (PED) was the most effective treatment sequence. QALYs for patients received SC, nedaplatin + SC, tislelizumab + SC, sintilimab + SC, camrelizumab + SC, sugemalimab + SC, pembrolizumab + SC followed by docetaxel were 0.866, 0.906, 1.179, 1.266, 1.179, 1.266, 1.603, 1.721, 1.807; QALYs for SC, nedaplatin + SC followed by tislelizumab were 1.283, 1.301; QALYs for SC, nedaplatin + SC followed by nivolumab were 1.353, 1.389. Camrelizumab + SC, followed by docetaxel (CAD) was the most cost-effective. Compared to SC with or without nedaplatin, tislelizumab, or sintilimab followed by docetaxel, ICERs of CAD were USD 12,276, 13,210, 6,974, 9,421/QALY, respectively. Compared with nedaplatin or SC followed by tislelizumab, the ICERs of CAD were USD 4,183, 2,804/QALY; CAD was dominant compared with nedaplatin or SC followed by nivolumab; The ICER of sugemalimab + SC followed by docetaxel and PED were USD 522,023, 481,639/QALY compared with CAD. Pembrolizumab + SC and camrelizumab + SC were the most effective and cost-effective first-line options, respectively; tislelizumab was the most effective and cost-effective second-line therapy. Tislelizumab used in second-line was more effective than first-line, no significant differences between their cost-effectiveness. Sensitivity and scenario analysis confirmed robustness of the results. PED and CAD are the most effective and cost-effective treatment sequence, respectively; pembrolizumab + SC and camrelizumab + SC are the most effective and cost-effective first-line choice, respectively; tislelizumab is the most effective and cost-effective second-line choice.

Bronchial artery chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads versus bronchial artery infusion followed by polyvinyl alcohol particles embolization for advanced squamous cell lung cancer: A retrospective study

PurposeTo analyze the efficacy and safety of bronchial arterial embolization (BACE) with drug-eluting beads (DEB) versus bronchial artery infusion (BAI) followed by polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) particle embolization for the treatment of advanced squamous cell lung cancer after the failure of systemic therapy. MethodThirty-six patients with advanced squamous cell lung cancer who underwent bronchial arterial interventional therapy were included in this retrospective study. The DEB group (n = 20) was treated with nedaplatin and DEB loaded with gemcitabine, and the PVA group (n = 16) BAI with nedaplatin and gemcitabine followed by embolization with PVA particles. The treatment efficacy and complications were analyzed. ResultsThe technical success rate was 100 %. The two groups were followed up for a median period of 8.9 months. The mean overall survival (OS) in the DEB group was 12.6 months (95 % CI:9.99–15.21), which was significantly longer than 8.14 months (95 % CI:6.07–10.2) in the PVA group (p = 0.007). The median progression-free survival (PFS) in the DEB group was 4.3 months (95 % CI:2.33–6.27), significantly longer than 3.2 months (95 % CI:2.55–3.85) in the PVA group (p = 0.030). The objective response rate (ORR) six months after the procedure was 50 % in the DEB group and 12.5 % in the PVA group. In the univariate and multivariate analyses, DEB-BACE was an independent prognostic factor for survival. Only grade 1 adverse events like fever, chest pain, and cough were seen. ConclusionsDEB-BACE may be a good choice for patients with advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma, as it could prolong OS and PFS without increasing adverse events.

Multistate Pharmacometric Model to Define the Impact of Second-Line Immunotherapies on the Survival Outcome of the IMpower131 Study.

Overall survival is defined as the time since randomization into the clinical trial to event of death or censor (end of trial or follow-up), and is considered to be the most reliable cancer end point. However, the introduction of second-line treatment after disease progression could influence survival and be considered a confounding factor. The aim of the current study was to set up a multistate model framework, using data from the IMpower131 study, to investigate the influence of second-line immunotherapies on overall survival analysis. The model adequately described the transitions between different states in patients with advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer treated with or without atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin, and characterized the survival data. High PD-L1 expression at baseline was associated with a decreased hazard of progression, while the presence of liver metastasis at baseline was indicative of a high risk of disease progression after initial response. The hazard of death after progression was lower for participants who had longer treatment response, i.e., longer time to progression. The simulations based on the final multistate model showed that the addition of atezolizumab to the nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin regimen had significant improvement in the patients' survival (hazard ratio=0.75, 95% prediction interval: 0.61-0.90 favoring the atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin arm). The developed modeling approach can be applied to other cancer types and therapies to provide a better understanding of efficacy of drug and characterizing different states, and investigate the benefit of primary therapy in survival while accounting for the switch to alternative treatment in the case of disease progression.

86P Efficacy and safety of IBI110 (anti-LAG-3 mAb) in combination with sintilimab (anti-PD-1 mAb) in advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer (sqNSCLC): Updated results of the phase Ib study

Although PD-1/L1 inhibitors have shown efficacy in advanced/metastatic sqNSCLC, many patients (pts) do not achieve robust response or durable benefit to this treatment. Hence, novel therapies that meet this requirement are needed. The preliminary results of IBI110 combined with sintilimab and chemotherapy (paclitaxel plus carboplatin, TP) (combination therapy) in pts with treatment-naive sqNSCLC were previously presented (Caicun Zhou et al. ASCO 2022). Here, we report updated results of this phase Ib study.

132P Randomized phase III study of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment for advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer (sq-NSCLC): RATIONALE-307 updated analysis

Interim analysis of the open-label phase 3 RATIONALE-307 study (NCT03594747) demonstrated clinical benefit, including significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) with a manageable safety profile, of tislelizumab (TIS) plus chemotherapy (chemo) as first-line (1L) therapy in patients (pts) with advanced sq-NSCLC vs chemo alone. Here, we report updated results.