Management Of Advanced Prostate Cancer Research Articles

The Androgen Deprivation Therapy Landscape in 2024 – Co-navigating the Available Options with Prostate Cancer Patients

This symposium convened during the 2024 European Association of Urology (EAU) Congress in Paris, France, focusing on the multifaceted aspects of prostate cancer (PCa) treatment from the patient’s perspective. The session delved into the nuanced needs, expectations, and treatment experiences encountered by individuals diagnosed with this condition. A pivotal aspect of the discussion centred on the imperative of ensuring patient awareness and informed consent, particularly concerning androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), given its array of potential side effects. ADT, a cornerstone in advanced PCa management, encompasses a spectrum of side effects including both physical and psychological dimensions. These include, but are not limited to, body hair loss, weight fluctuations, mood alterations, decreased libido, cognitive impairments, muscle atrophy, and bone density loss. Effective management of these side effects requires comprehensive support to be provided to patients to mitigate complications and optimise quality of life. The options for ADT were discussed, with their comparative strengths and challenges. ADT strategies take effect over different time periods (from 12 hours up to 4 weeks), exert varying effects on testosterone levels, and carry different side effect profiles. Selecting the optimal course of treatment for localised or locally advanced PCa requires consideration of whether the patient is at intermediate-, high-, or very high-risk of biochemical recurrence, and whether the intermediate-risk disease is classified as favourable intermediate-risk (FIR) or unfavourable intermediate-risk (UIR). While continuous ADT is the standard of care, intermittent ADT has been associated with significantly better quality of life scores for hot flushes, desire for sexual activity, and urinary symptoms, with a trend toward improvement in the level of fatigue. Furthermore, the interplay between PCa, ADT, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) was discussed to underscore the imperative for clinicians to assess the cardiovascular risks associated with ADT, particularly in patients with heightened cardiovascular vulnerability. Mitigating the adverse skeletal effects of ADT mandates a multifaceted approach encompassing nutritional supplementation, exercise regimens, and lifestyle modifications including alcohol cessation and smoking cessation. Integrating a prehabilitation checklist into clinical practice emerges as a pragmatic strategy to facilitate informed discussions regarding the potential adverse effects of ADT, enabling proactive support provision to optimise patient outcomes.

A dual-targeted small-molecule photosensitizer with enhanced dual antitumor and anti-vascular effect for metastatic advanced prostate cancer photodynamic therapy

Advanced prostate cancer is regarded as a fatal disease, characterized by limited treatment options, poor prognosis and considerable tumor metastasis closely related to angiogenesis. Photodynamic therapy emerges as a promising and safe therapeutic modality for advanced prostate cancer with high metastasis and high fatality rate due to its focal damage to tumor cells, as well as its anti-angiogenesis and antitumor immunity capabilities. Herein, a tumor-targeting vascular disrupting agent ASA-404 was introduced to conjugate with a photosensitizer ZnPc for targeted prostate cancer treatment and enhanced vascular-disrupting efficiency. Notably, this novel organic small-molecule photosensitizer Pc-ASA possess a well-defined chemical structure and purity, as well as good photophysical and photochemical properties, which are of benefit for clinical approval and application. Pc-ASA prefers to accumulate in both prostate cancer cells and vascular endothelial cells. Moreover, the conjugation of ASA-404 boosts the photodynamic anticancer effect of Pc-ASA towards both prostate cancer cells and vascular endothelial cells. Ultimately, PC-ASA can successfully inhibit the migration and metastasis of prostate cancer cells, offering significant advantages in advanced prostate cancer management. Our study might open a window in the development of the tumor and vascular dual-targeted small-molecule photosensitizers, with the potential to achieve safe and efficient treatment of metastatic advanced prostate cancer through dual mode of antitumor and anti-vascular action.

A Pharmacological Overview of Degarelix and Relugolix in Advanced Prostate Cancer

Prostate cancer (PCa) ranks the second most diagnosed cancers among men globally and the sixth leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Advanced prostate cancer can be defined as the recurrence after definitive therapies (radical prostatectomy or external beam radiotherapy) and de novo metastasis (metastasis without prior treatment). Advanced PCa can be categorized as metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), non-metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC), and metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Management of advanced PCa often involves castration to reduce testosterone levels, which can be achieved by gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonists such as degarelix and relugolix. Degarelix is injectable while relugolix is an orally administered form of GnRH antagonist. This review aims to explore the latest pharmacological aspects of these drugs to inform treatment decisions for advanced PCa.

Targeting adenocarcinoma and enzalutamide‑resistant prostate cancer using the novel anti‑androgen inhibitor ADA‑308.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the leading cause of cancer‑related death among men worldwide. PCa often develops resistance to standard androgen deprivation therapy and androgen receptor (AR) pathway inhibitors, such as enzalutamide (ENZ). Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop novel therapeutic strategies for this disease. The efficacy of ADA‑308 was evaluated through in vitro assessments of AR activity and cell proliferation, alongside in vivo studies. ADA‑308 has emerged as a promising candidate, demonstrating potent inhibition of AR‑sensitive adenocarcinoma as well as ENZ‑resistant PCa cell lines. The results of the study revealed that ADA‑308 effectively blocked AR activity, including its nuclear localization, and inhibited cell proliferation in vitro. Furthermore, ADA‑308 demonstrated notable efficacy in vivo, with a robust antitumor response in ENZ‑resistant models. These findings establish the role of ADA‑308 as a potent AR inhibitor that overcomes resistance to AR‑targeted therapies and highlights its potential as a novel therapeutic approach in advanced PCa management.

LX1 Targets Androgen Receptor Variants and AKR1C3 to overcome Therapy Resistance in Advanced Prostate Cancer.

The development of resistance to current standard-of-care treatments, such as androgen receptor (AR) targeting therapies, remains a major challenge in the management of advanced prostate cancer. There is an urgent need for therapeutic strategies targeting key resistance drivers, such as AR variants like AR-V7 and steroidogenic enzymes like AKR1C3, to improve outcomes for patients with advanced prostate cancer. Here, we designed, synthesized, and characterized a class of LX compounds targeting both AR/AR variants and AKR1C3. Molecular docking indicated that LX compounds bound to the AKR1C3 active sites. LX1 blocked AKR1C3 enzymatic activity, suppressing the conversion of androstenedione into testosterone. LX compounds also reduced AR/AR-V7 expression and downregulated their target genes. In vitro, LX1 inhibited the growth of prostate cancer cells resistant to antiandrogens, including enzalutamide, abiraterone, apalutamide, and darolutamide. Treatment with LX1 in vivo significantly decreased tumor growth, lowered serum PSA levels, and reduced intratumoral testosterone levels, without affecting mouse body weight. Furthermore, LX1 overcame resistance to enzalutamide treatment, and the combination of LX1 with enzalutamide further suppressed tumor growth. Collectively, the dual effect of LX1 in reducing intratumoral testosterone and AR signaling, along with its synergy with standard therapies in resistant models, underscores its potential as a valuable treatment option for advanced prostate cancer.

Management of advanced prostate cancer in the Asia-Pacific region: Summary of the Asia-Pacific Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2023.

The aim of the third Asia-Pacific Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APAC APCCC 2023) was to discuss the application in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region of consensus statements from the 4th Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC 2022). The one-day meeting in July 2023 brought together 27 experts from 14 APAC countries. The meeting covered five topics: (1) Intermediate- and high-risk and locally advanced prostate cancer; (2) Management of newly diagnosed metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer; (3) Management of non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer; (4) Homologous recombination repair mutation testing; (5) Management of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Pre- and post-symposium polling gathered APAC-specific responses to APCCC consensus questions and insights on current practices and challenges in the APAC region. APAC APCCC highlights APAC-specific considerations in an evolving landscape of diagnostic technologies and treatment innovations for advanced prostate cancer. While new technologies are available in the region, cost and reimbursement continue to influence practice significantly. Individual patient considerations, including the impact of chemophobia on Asian patients, also influence decision-making. The use of next-generation imaging, genetic testing, and new treatment combinations is increasing the complexity and duration of prostate cancer management. Familiarity with new diagnostic and treatment options is growing in the APAC region. Insights highlight the continued importance of a multidisciplinary approach that includes nuclear medicine, genetic counseling, and quality-of-life expertise. The APAC APCCC meeting provides an important opportunity to share practice and identify APAC-specific issues and considerations in areas of low evidence where clinical experience is growing.

Clinical Management of Advanced Prostate Cancer: Where Does Radiopharmaceutical Therapy Fit in the Treatment Algorithm?

Most men with newly appreciated metastatic prostate cancer are optimally treated with a backbone consisting of androgen receptor-directed therapy with or without taxane chemotherapy. Despite improvements in disease outcomes, prostate cancer remains an extremely heterogeneous disease with variable mechanisms of therapeutic resistance. As a result, it remains a leading cause of cancer-related death in men. Radiopharmaceutical therapy has emerged as an alternative, non-androgen receptor-directed treatment modality for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer that impacts patient survival and represents a potentially more personalized approach. In this review, we aim to outline the current treatment landscape for metastatic prostate cancer with a focus on radiopharmaceutical therapy, specifically 177Lu-PSMA-617. In addition, we illustrate various clinical challenges with 177Lu-PSMA-617 treatment to date and explore investigative efforts to leverage radiopharmaceutical therapies as part of combination regimens or earlier in the treatment algorithm to further improve patient outcomes. Finally, we introduce ongoing studies of alternative radiopharmaceutical therapies in metastatic prostate cancer that may be incorporated into the treatment algorithm pending further study.

Nuclear receptor NURR1 functions to promote stemness and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in prostate cancer via its targeting of Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway

Dysregulated activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway is a frequent or common event during advanced progression of multiple cancers. With this signaling activation, it enhances their tumorigenic growth and facilitates metastasis and therapy resistance. Advances show that this signaling pathway can play dual regulatory roles in the control of cellular processes epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and cancer stemness in cancer progression. Aberrant activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway is shown to be common in prostate cancer and also castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). However, the transcriptional regulators of this pathway in prostate cancer are still not well characterized. NURR1 (NR4A2) is an orphan nuclear receptor and plays an important role in the development of dopaminergic neurons. Previously, we have shown that NURR1 exhibits an upregulation in isolated prostate cancer stem-like cells (PCSCs) and a xenograft model of CRPC. In this study, we further confirmed that NURR1 exhibited an upregulation in prostate cancer and also enhanced expression in prostate cancer cell lines. Functional and molecular analyses showed that NURR1 could act to promote both in vitro (cancer stemness and EMT) and also in vivo oncogenic growth of prostate cancer cells (metastasis and castration resistance) via its direct transactivation of CTNNB1 (β-catenin) and activation of β-catenin to mediate the activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Moreover, we also demonstrated that NURR1 activity in prostate cancer cells could be modulated by small molecules, implicating that NURR1 could be a potential therapeutic target for advanced prostate cancer management.

PARP inhibitors alone or in combination for prostate cancer.

DNA repair genomic aberrations in the Homologous Recombination pathway are identifiable in up to 25% of patients with advanced prostate cancer, making them more likely to benefit from treatment with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) alone or in combination with other therapies, particularly when BRCA driver genomic aberrations are documented. Although several clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of this approach, the validation of reliable biomarkers predictive of response still needs further improvement to refine patient selection. In this setting, the characterization of resistance mechanisms and the validation of novel biomarkers are critical to maximize clinical benefit and to develop novel treatment combinations to improve outcomes. In this review, we summarize the development of PARPi in prostate cancer as single agent as well as the efficacy of their combination with other drugs, and the future directions for their implementation in the management of advanced prostate cancer.

Toxicity-benefit analysis of advanced prostate cancer trials using weighted toxicity scoring.

110 Background: The weighted toxicity score (WTS) is a metric suitable for comparing the toxicity burden in experimental versus control arms of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). When compared against clinical endpoints, the WTS can be used to evaluate the cost versus benefit of anti-cancer agents. This study sought to apply the WTS to prostate cancer (PC) clinical trials. Methods: Select phase 3 PC RCTs with reported adverse event (AE) data were compiled. The WTS was computed for each trial arm and compared to reported hazard ratios (HRs) of primary and/or secondary endpoints (i.e., overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS)). Average WTSs for the experimental versus control arms were used to calculate the toxicity differential between treatment arms. Average HRs for OS and PFS were used to compare efficacy. Results: Sixteen RCTs were analyzed (investigational agents: androgen-receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSi) [n = 4], poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) monotherapy [n = 3], ARSi + PARPi as well as ARSi + ARSi combination therapies [n = 3 each], and triple therapy [n=3]). The median number of distinct reported AEs across all studies was 18 (range, 9-61). Overall, toxicity and efficacy were greater among experimental than control arms (6.62 versus 4.00 median WTS; median HR for OS 0.71, median HR for PFS 0.61). The triple therapy studies observed the lowest increase in toxicity by adding an ARSi to control therapy (10.4%), associated with 52% lower risk of progression, and 29% lower risk of death. Comparably, the ARSi + PARPi trials noted the highest increase in toxicity (79.7%), with 32% lower risk of progression and 12% lower risk of death. The PARPi monotherapy, ARSi monotherapy, and ARSi + ARSi combination therapy studies reported increased toxicity due to experimental therapy in descending order (Table). Conclusions: The WTS enables toxicity versus benefit assessment for anti-cancer regimens. Clinical application of this metric may facilitate individualized treatment planning in advanced PC management. [Table: see text]

Integrated analysis identifies GABRB3 as a biomarker in prostate cancer

BackgroundTreatment failure following androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) presents a significant challenge in the management of advanced prostate cancer. Thus, understanding the genetic factors influencing this process could facilitate the development of personalized treatments and innovative therapeutic strategies. The phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT signaling pathway plays a pivotal role in controlling cell growth and tumorigenesis. We hypothesized that genetic variants within this pathway may affect the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing ADT for prostate cancer.MethodsWe genotyped 399 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across 28 core PI3K/AKT pathway genes in a cohort of 630 patients with prostate cancer undergoing ADT. We assessed the potential association of the SNPs with patient survival. Functional analyses of the implicated genes were also performed to evaluate their effects on prostate cancer.ResultsAfter multivariate Cox regression analysis and multiple testing correction, GABRB3 rs12591845 exhibited the most significant association with both overall and cancer-specific survivals (P < 0.003). A comprehensive pooled analysis of 16 independent gene expression datasets revealed elevated expression of GABRB3 in prostate cancer tissues compared to that in normal tissues (P < 0.001). Furthermore, gene set enrichment analysis unveiled differential enrichment of pathways such as myogenesis, interferon γ and α responses, and the MYC proto-oncogene pathway in tumors with elevated GABRB3 expression, implying a role for GABRB3 in prostate cancer.ConclusionOur results suggest that rs12591845 could potentially serve as a valuable prognostic indicator for patients undergoing ADT. The potential role of GABRB3 in promoting prostate tumorigenesis is also highlighted.

Future Landscape in High-risk Prostate Cancer and Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Summary The management of high-risk and advanced prostate cancer had a major paradigm shift over the past decade. From the Huggins’ era of sole androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), the management has evolved to novel androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSI), chemotherapy, targeted molecular, immunotherapy, and radiotheranostics. The management of advanced prostate cancer is broadly studied under metastatic hormone or castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) or metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The mCSPC has evolved from mere ADT to the use of abiraterone, enzalutamide, and docetaxel-based chemotherapy and the burning conflict of treatment intensification with triplet therapy. Various novel agents, such as poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPIs) and radiotheranostics, are being explored in the management of mCSPC. The management of mCRPC has evolved from mitoxantrone to docetaxel-based therapy, novel ARSI therapy, PARPI, 177 lutetium-prostate-specific membrane antigen-617, or novel-targeted therapy.

Addressing controversial areas in the management of advanced prostate cancer in Canada Areas of consensus and controversy from the third Canadian consensus forum.

The management of prostate cancer (PCa) is rapidly evolving. Treatment and diagnostic options grow annually, however, high-level evidence for the use of new therapeutics and diagnostics is lacking. In November 2022, the Genitourinary Research Consortium held its 3rd Canadian Consensus Forum (CCF3) to provide guidance on key controversial areas for management of PCa. A steering committee of eight multidisciplinary physicians identified topics for discussion and adapted questions from the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2022 for CCF3. Questions focused on management of metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC); use of novel imaging, germline testing, and genomic profiling; and areas of non-consensus from CCF2. Fifty-eight questions were voted on during a live forum, with threshold for "consensus agreement" set at 75%. The voting panel consisted of 26 physicians: 13 urologists/uro-oncologists, nine medical oncologists, and four radiation oncologists. Consensus was reached for 32 of 58 questions (one ad-hoc). Consensus was seen in the use of local treatment, to not use metastasis-directed therapy for low-volume mCSPC, and to use triplet therapy for synchronous high-volume mCSPC (low prostate-specific antigen). Consensus was also reached on sufficiency of conventional imaging to manage disease, use of germline testing and genomic profiling for metastatic disease, and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors for BRCA-positive prostate cancer. CCF3 identified consensus agreement and provides guidance on >30 practice scenarios related to management of PCa and nine areas of controversy, which represent opportunities for research and education to improve patient care. Consensus initiatives provide valuable guidance on areas of controversy as clinicians await high-level evidence.

Personalized dietary management of advanced prostate cancer using nutrigenomics: a case report

While there are emerging reports in the scientific literature on potential associations between cholesterol/lipids and prostate cancer, information on the dietary management of these cancer patients is currently lacking. We report on a 57-year-old white Australian male diagnosed with advanced prostate cancer who had personalized dietary management in preparation for and following his medical treatment: radiation and radical prostatectomy. Dietary recommendations were based on his blood results and nutrigenomic tests which showed a history of and genetic predisposition to dyslipidemia. Nutritional analysis also confirmed the need for dietary modification of his fat intake. Eighteen months post medical and dietary intervention his PSA level was reported at 0.1 ug/L and all blood lipid levels were within reference ranges. At two years there was no detectable disease recurrence and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was not required. Personalized dietary recommendations could be a clinically beneficial addition to the multidisciplinary management of prostate cancer patients.

Loss of PDE4D7 expression promotes androgen independence, neuroendocrine differentiation and alterations in DNA repair: implications for therapeutic strategies

BackgroundAndrogen signalling remains the seminal therapeutic approach for the management of advanced prostate cancer. However, most tumours eventually shift towards an aggressive phenotype, characterised by androgen independence and treatment resistance. The cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) pathway plays a crucial role in regulating various cellular processes, with the phosphodiesterase PDE4D7 being a vital modulator of cAMP signalling in prostate cancer cells.MethodsUsing shRNA-mediated PDE4D7 knockdown in LNCaP cells and downstream analysis via RNA sequencing and phenotypic assays, we replicate clinical observations that diminished PDE4D7 expression promotes an aggressive prostate cancer phenotype.ResultsOur study provides evidence that loss of PDE4D7 expression represents a pivotal switch driving the transition from an androgen-sensitive state to hormone unresponsiveness and neuroendocrine differentiation. In addition, we demonstrate that PDE4D7 loss affects DNA repair pathways, conferring resistance to poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors.ConclusionReinstating PDE4D7 expression sensitises prostate cancer cells to anti-androgens, DNA damage response inhibitors, and cytotoxic therapies. These findings provide significant insight into the regulatory role of PDE4D7 in the development of lethal prostate cancer and the potential of its modulation as a novel therapeutic strategy.

Unleashing novel horizons in advanced prostate cancer treatment: investigating the potential of prostate specific membrane antigen-targeted nanomedicine-based combination therapy.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a prevalent malignancy with increasing incidence in middle-aged and older men. Despite various treatment options, advanced metastatic PCa remains challenging with poor prognosis and limited effective therapies. Nanomedicine, with its targeted drug delivery capabilities, has emerged as a promising approach to enhance treatment efficacy and reduce adverse effects. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) stands as one of the most distinctive and highly selective biomarkers for PCa, exhibiting robust expression in PCa cells. In this review, we explore the applications of PSMA-targeted nanomedicines in advanced PCa management. Our primary objective is to bridge the gap between cutting-edge nanomedicine research and clinical practice, making it accessible to the medical community. We discuss mainstream treatment strategies for advanced PCa, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy, in the context of PSMA-targeted nanomedicines. Additionally, we elucidate novel treatment concepts such as photodynamic and photothermal therapies, along with nano-theragnostics. We present the content in a clear and accessible manner, appealing to general physicians, including those with limited backgrounds in biochemistry and bioengineering. The review emphasizes the potential benefits of PSMA-targeted nanomedicines in enhancing treatment efficiency and improving patient outcomes. While the use of PSMA-targeted nano-drug delivery has demonstrated promising results, further investigation is required to comprehend the precise mechanisms of action, pharmacotoxicity, and long-term outcomes. By meticulous optimization of the combination of nanomedicines and PSMA ligands, a novel horizon of PSMA-targeted nanomedicine-based combination therapy could bring renewed hope for patients with advanced PCa.

Neferine Targets the Oncogenic Characteristics of Androgen-Dependent Prostate Cancer Cells via Inducing Reactive Oxygen Species.

Castration resistance poses a significant challenge in the management of advanced prostate cancer (PCa), with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) or chemotherapy being the primary treatment options. However, these approaches often lead to significant side effects and the development of therapeutic resistance. Therefore, it is crucial to explore novel treatment options that can efficiently target PCa, improve patient survival, and enhance their quality of life. Neferine (Nef), a bioactive compound derived from plants, has emerged as a promising candidate for cancer treatment due to its ability to induce apoptosis, autophagy, and cell cycle arrest. In this study, we investigated the potential anticancer effects of Nef in androgen receptor (AR)-positive LNCaP and VCaP cells, representative models of androgen-dependent PCa. Our findings demonstrate that Nef effectively inhibits cell growth, proliferation, and the tumorigenic potential of androgen-dependent PCa cells. Furthermore, Nef treatment resulted in the excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), leading to the activation of key markers of autophagy and apoptosis. These results suggest that Nef has the potential to target the oncogenic characteristics of androgen-dependent PCa cells by exploiting the potency of ROS and inducing autophagy and apoptosis in AR-positive PCa cells. These findings shed light on the therapeutic potential of Nef as a novel treatment option with reduced side effects for androgen-dependent prostate cancer. Further investigations are warranted to assess its efficacy and safety in preclinical and clinical settings.

Immunogenomic profiles associated with response to life-prolonging agents in prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer but the management of advanced prostate cancer remains a therapeutic challenge, despite the survival benefits imparted by several therapeutic discoveries targeting different molecular pathways. The mechanisms of resistance to androgen deprivation and tumour progression to lethal metastatic variants are often regulated by androgen receptor (AR) bypass mechanisms and/or neuroendocrine differentiation. Moreover, recent data also suggested the involvement of adaptive and innate infiltrated immune cells in prostate tumour progression. Improvements in cancer genome analyses contributed to a better understanding of antitumour immunity and provided solutions for targeting highly cancer-specific neoantigens generated from somatic mutations in individual patients. In this review, we investigated the current knowledge on the interplay between cancer development and the complex mechanisms of immune regulation. Particularly, we focused on the role of tumour immune microenvironment, generally characterised by strong barriers for immunotherapy, and we discuss the rationale for the potential application of single agent and combination immune-targeting strategies that could lead to improved outcomes. Careful selection based on clinical and genomic factors may allow identification of patients who could benefit from this treatment approach in multiple settings (from localised to advanced prostate tumour) and in different histological subtypes (from adenocarcinoma to neuroendocrine prostate cancer).

Hierarchical Phosphorylation of HOXB13 by mTOR Dictates Its Activity and Oncogenic Function in Prostate Cancer.

Control of HOXB13 transcriptional activity via its direct phosphorylation by the mTOR kinase is a potential therapeutic avenue for the management of advanced prostate cancer.

Efficacy of Degarelix in the Neoadjuvant Setting in Managing Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer.

Background Prostate cancer holds a substantial presence in the global cancer landscape, and a considerable proportion of diagnoses occur at late stages, particularly in India. Management of locally advanced prostate cancer necessitates a multimodal treatment strategy. A critical part of this strategy is neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy, typically administered via luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogs. This study explores the potential of an alternative approach: neoadjuvant therapy with degarelix, an LHRH antagonist, and its impact on perioperative and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for locally advanced or high-risk prostate cancer. Methodology We conducted a retrospective, non-randomized clinical study at Apollo Hospitals in Chennai, India. Patients diagnosed with locally advanced or high-risk prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy were included. Participants were patients treated with neoadjuvant degarelix and subsequent radical prostatectomy between March 2020 and June 2022. We excluded patients receiving radical radiotherapy, those switching from LHRH agonists to antagonists, and those contraindicated for androgen deprivation therapy due to existing comorbidities. For comparison, we selected a group from the institutional database who received conventional treatment (i.e., without neoadjuvant therapy). Results The study compared two groups, each with 32 patients. The groups had no significant difference in total operative duration and console times. The postoperative pathological assessment showed significantly lower margin positivity rates and notable pathological downstaging in the group receiving neoadjuvant degarelix compared to the control group. The incidence of node positivity, prostate-specific antigen levels at three months postoperative, and number of pads used per day at one month did not differ significantly between the two groups. Conclusions Our study suggests that neoadjuvant degarelix could notably enhance patient outcomes in locally advanced prostate cancer management. The benefits include improved symptom control, significant reductions in margin positivity rates, and facilitated surgical procedures. Neoadjuvant degarelix therapy could potentially enhance the feasibility of the surgical intervention in locally advanced prostate cancer management, thus suggesting a promising pathway for improved patient care.