Advanced Practice Providers Research Articles

An Introductory Course on Geriatric Oncology.

The need to train oncologists to address the complexities of the aging population has been a focus of educational initiatives and strategies since the 1980s. However, large gaps in the dissemination and implementation of geriatric oncology curricula are still present. Currently, few resources exist for oncology training programs to implement a formal geriatric oncology curriculum. We aimed to create a formalized introductory course to teach oncology and geriatrics trainees the principles of geriatric oncology. Curriculum presentations were delivered to both hematology/oncology and geriatrics fellows during five 1-hour didactic/workshop sessions over a 2-month period. In addition to didactic presentations, sessions included interactive learning components and a case-based workshop. Evaluation of the curriculum was conducted through pre- and postcourse knowledge and competency assessments, as well as individual session satisfaction surveys. Fifteen (11 hematology/oncology and four geriatric medicine) clinical fellows participated in the first presentation of this curriculum during the 2022-2023 academic year. The mean score on the precourse knowledge assessment was 7.1 (SD = 2.5) out of a maximum score of 15 compared with a mean score on the postcourse knowledge assessment of 9.8 (SD = 3.0; CI: 8.0-11.6; t = -2.5; p = .02). Course content was successfully implemented into the hematology/oncology and geriatric medicine fellowship core curriculum using the above methods. Future directions include presentation of course material to incoming trainees, content refinement based on satisfaction surveys, and interdisciplinary adaptation for trainees in other health care disciplines (e.g., nursing, advanced practice providers, etc.).

Oncology Survivorship Care Clinics: Design and Implementation of Survivorship Care Delivery Systems at NCCN Member Institutions.

It is estimated that there are >18 million cancer survivors in the United States, and there is a growing number of survivorship programs across the country to care for these individuals. There is a clear need for survivorship care; however, evidence is still emerging on how to best operationalize the guidance from nationally recognized organizations and clinical practice guidelines. The NCCN Best Practices Committee (BPC) recently conducted a survey to better understand survivorship clinics at NCCN Member Institutions. Representatives from 24 of the 33 NCCN Member Institutions (73%) submitted responses to the survey. Although all responding centers see cancer survivors, most (92%) have ≥1 dedicated survivorship clinics. Of those centers with dedicated survivorship clinics (n=22), 9 (41%) reported general survivorship clinics for all cancer types, and 13 (59%) indicated their center offered ≥1 disease-specific survivorship clinics. Most centers (55%) use a mix of physicians and advanced practice providers (APPs; nurse practitioners and/or physician assistants) to staff survivorship clinics; however, 9 (41%) are staffed entirely by APPs and 1 (4%) is staffed entirely by physicians. The vast majority (91%) have dedicated scheduling templates, and most (73%) have dedicated clinic space for survivorship clinics. The referral process for survivorship clinics varies across centers, with 16 (73%) using algorithms, guidelines, or pathways to determine when a patient is referred to a survivorship clinic. Findings may reflect the evolution of survivorship care and indicate a move toward standardizing which patients are seen and when. It is notable that >50% of institutions reported a model in which they follow survivors for their lifetime. Given the number of patients impacted by cancer, these data highlight the need to continue refining how survivorship care models are integrated into cancer centers to best serve patients with cancer and cancer survivors.

Abstract Su1206: Reduced Time to Goal Therapeutic Hypothermia With Implementation of a Post Cardiac Arrest Consult Service

Introduction: Critical care after advanced cardiac life support can be pivotal for survival and outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Prior studies have demonstrated improvements in survival after OHCA with shorter door-to-therapeutic hypothermia (TH) initiation times. Post-cardiac arrest consult teams (PCACT) can facilitate TH to goal 33°C and other aspects of post-arrest care. However, the effects of such a service on TH have not been consistently quantified. Hypothesis: More OHCA patients would undergo TH and reach goal temperature sooner following implementation of a PCACT. Aims: We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of a PCACT in optimizing TH in survivors of OHCA. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 305 patients admitted between January 1, 2021 and December 31, 2022. Implementation of a dedicated PCACT, comprised of a neurointensivist and an advanced practice provider or neurocritical care fellow, occurred on January 1, 2022. The PCACT was active on weekdays only. One year before and after this date were designated as “pre-PCACT” and “post-PCACT”, respectively. De-identified patient demographics, clinical features of cardiac arrest, and TH data were collected and compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum and Chi-squared tests for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Results: Of the 305 patients admitted during the study period, 149 were in the pre-PCACT group and 156 were in the post-PCACT group. Baseline demographics between the two groups were similar except that the post-PCACT group had more patients with non-shockable rhythms (64% vs. 54%, p =0.001). Patients were not cooled to 33°C more frequently (50 vs. 52%) pre- or post-PCACT. TH to 33°C was performed in 156 (51%) patients, 78 patients (50%) pre- and post-PCACT implementation. There were no baseline demographic or temperature differences between the two groups amongst patients undergoing TH to 33°C. Post-PCACT patients were quicker to reach 33°C (1.6 vs. 3 hours, p =0.001). After PCACT implementation, this difference was noted during weekdays but not during weekends (1.3 vs. 2.7 hours, p =0.05).There were no differences in survival or neurologic outcomes pre- and post-PCACT introduction, nor between patients who were or were not cooled to 33C. Conclusion(s): Implementation of a PCACT may streamline care to reduce time to goal temperature during TH. However, further study is required to determine whether a PCACT can improve outcomes.

Abstract 4135630: Improving Cardiac Rehab Referral and Enrollment Post-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Through a Workflow Intervention at the Minneapolis VA: A Quality Improvement Study

Introduction: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a Class 1A recommendation post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), yet it remains underutilized. At the Minneapolis VA, the referral and enrollment rates for CR post-PCI are significantly below the national goal of 70%, indicating a need for improved strategies to enhance veteran participation. Research Questions: This study investigates the impact of a workflow intervention on CR enrollment rates and seeks to understand how staffing changes may influence these rates. It also explores the potential for advanced practice providers to affect CR enrollment. Aim: We aim to increase CR enrollment to 40% and referrals to 50% post-PCI at the Minneapolis VA by August 2023, utilizing a nurse practitioner dedicated to interventional cardiology patients post-PCI. Methods: Utilizing the VA CART database, demographic data for patients undergoing PCI between October 2017 and August 2023 were analyzed, excluding those who died within 30 days of PCI. CR referrals within 90 days and enrollments within one year were tracked. Statistical process control charts were used to detect variations in referral and enrollment rates, with a t-test determining significance. The staffing change intervention occurred in May of 2020. Results: The intervention led to a significant increase in both referral and enrollment rates. The average monthly referral rate rose from 24% to 37%, and the enrollment rate from 14% to 28%. A statistical process control chart indicated special cause variation in the sample after the intervention, suggesting meaningful change. Statistical analysis confirmed these increases as significant (p<0.001). Conclusion: The staffing intervention at the Minneapolis VA significantly improved CR referral and enrollment rates post-PCI. This suggests that dedicated cardiac care providers can play a crucial role in enhancing CR utilization, potentially informing future quality improvement initiatives.

Patient-Reported Goals of Care in the Preoperative Clinic: Barriers to and Facilitators of Patient Values Elicitation and Documentation.

Infrequent preoperative goals of care (GOC) documentation leads to challenges in medical decision-making when patients experience postoperative complications. We evaluated the feasibility of enhancing GOC documentation through a patient portal-based values questionnaire. A patient values questionnaire (PVQ) was distributed to patients before their Gynecologic Surgical Oncology clinic appointments via an electronic health record (EHR)-based portal from June to October 2023. Surgeons and advanced practice providers were encouraged to address PVQ responses during clinic appointments. Patient acceptability surveys were sent to PVQ respondents and clinicians were interviewed to assess feasibility and acceptability. PVQ response rate was 225/383 (59%); 29% of all patients had an established cancer diagnosis. Clinicians deemed preoperative GOC documentation important and the PVQ valuable to prepare for unexpected postoperative complications. Accessing questionnaire responses through the EHR was a technical barrier. Clinicians agreed that GOC should be addressed after diagnosis and treatment discussions, but before surgery. Ninety percent of patients felt comfortable discussing GOC at their first clinic appointment. Patient portals facilitate preoperative GOC documentation, however, clarifying and integrating values into care require ongoing discussions between clinicians and patients. Optimal timing of GOC elicitation is posttreatment planning and before surgery when the patient is most informed.

A quantitative needs assessment for a tele-ultrasound consult program in a tertiary care Emergency Department.

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has been shown to be beneficial in facilitating patient care, but its adoption is variable among emergency medicine (EM) clinicians. We identified the patterns of POCUS use and gaps in POCUS integration in a tertiary care emergency department (ED). These data provide a user-centered platform for subsequent development of a tele-ultrasound (tele-US) consultation program. We developed a 25-item needs assessment survey and used a 5-point Likert scale to assess current patterns of POCUS use and potential needs for POCUS among EM clinicians. Data were analyzed descriptively, and a chi-square analysis was used to assess for differences in POCUS use and comfort levels among clinicians. Overall, 48% (91/190) of eligible providers responded to the survey. Clinician responders included 38% (35/91) attendings (including fellows), 29% (26/91) residents, and 33% (30/91) advance practice providers (APPs). In assessing needs, 70% (58/83) of clinicians noted they would use POCUS more if they had more training. 76% (63/83) of clinicians felt comfortable with image acquisition and 68% (56/83) with image interpretation. APPs were less comfortable with POCUS image interpretation and clinical integration of POCUS findings compared to residents (χ2: 16.3, p < 0.0001 and χ2: 5.1, p = 0.02, respectively). 65% (54/83) of clinicians would use POCUS more if real-time supervision via tele-US was available for image acquisition and image interpretation. EM clinicians indicated a substantial need for further real-time POCUS training and supervision, especially for image interpretation. A clinician-centered strategy, such as tele-US, has potential to increase proficient use of POCUS.

Clinician contributions to central nervous system-active polypharmacy among older adults with dementia in the United States.

Exposure to central nervous system (CNS)-active polypharmacy-overlapping exposure to three or more CNS-active medications-is potentially harmful yet common among persons living with dementia (PLWD). The extent to which these medications are prescribed to community-dwelling PLWD by individual clinicians versus distributed across multiple prescribers is unclear. We identified community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries with a dementia diagnosis and Medicare Parts A, B, and D coverage for at least one month in 2019. Using fill date and days' supply for prescriptions filled between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2019, we identified beneficiaries exposed to CNS-active polypharmacy (i.e., >30 days of overlapping exposure to three or more antidepressant, antipsychotic, antiseizure, benzodiazepine, opioid, nonbenzodiazepine benzodiazepine receptor agonists, or skeletal muscle relaxant medications). We examined the number and type of clinicians who contributed to polypharmacy person-days among PLWD. The cohort included 955,074 PLWD who were primarily female (64.0%), were White (78.5%), and had a mean age of 83.4 years (standard deviation 8.0). Notably, 14.3% were exposed to CNS-active polypharmacy. At the person level, 24.6% of PLWD experienced polypharmacy prescribed by a single clinician. Considering total days of exposure, 45.3% of polypharmacy person-days were prescribed by a single clinician. Primary care physicians prescribed 63.0% of polypharmacy person-days and accounted for the plurality of days for all seven medication classes, followed by psychiatrists for antipsychotics and benzodiazepines and primary care advanced practice providers (APPs) for antidepressants and antiseizure medications. In this cross-sectional analysis of Medicare claims data, primary care clinicians (both physicians and APPs) prescribed the majority of medications that contributed to CNS-active polypharmacy for PLWD. Future research is needed to identify strategies to support primary care clinicians in appropriate prescribing of CNS-active medications to PLWD.

The American Headache Society First Contact-Headache in Primary Care program: Current metrics, knowledge assessments, and direction for future initiatives.

This study examines the American Headache Society First Contact-Headache in Primary Care program metrics to date in order to assess the program's reach and provide direction for future initiatives. Approximately 4 million primary care office visits annually are headache-specific encounters. Therefore, it is important that primary care providers are knowledgeable about headache management. Recognizing the need, the American Headache Society First Contact designed the comprehensive First Contact-Headache in Primary Care program with input from an advisory board comprised of a diverse group of physicians and advanced practice providers with backgrounds in family and internal medicine, pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology, and neurology. This is the first study to assess the reach of the program and critically examine how to best meet the needs of clinicians and patients going forward. We report descriptive statistics for the First Contact website metrics from October 2020 to June 2023 and grand rounds program data from May 2020 to December 2023. We also conducted a cross-sectional analysis of survey data from presentations conducted at two large national family medicine symposia, as well as a thematic analysis of the question: "Please indicate what areas of your practice could be enhanced or improved with additional education?" The First Contact program homepage was the second most visited page on the American Headache Society website (>100,000 views). A total of 20 podcast episodes were created for the program (>3500 plays). The First Contact program held 99 events (72 institutional grand rounds, 22 State-level meetings, and five national meetings), reaching >7000 clinicians. The institutional grand rounds and state-level meetings were held across 27 States and Washington D.C. Only 31.9% (30/94) of First Contact program events (excluding national meetings) occurred in the West census region, which has the fewest headache subspecialists and lowest headache subspecialist density in the United States. When examining survey data of participants who attended the two virtual national family medicine symposia (39.3% response rate, N = 636/1620), 85.7% (544/635) reported being "completely confident" or "veryconfident" in their ability to recognize and accurately diagnose patients presenting with a primary complaint of headache and 81.5% (517/634) reported being "completely confident" or "very confident" in their ability to develop evidence-based treatment plans that are tailored to the needs of individual patients. The use of diagnostic tools to recognize patients with migraine (60.4%, 384/636) and translating standards of care to the practice setting (42.5%, 270/636) were the most reported intended changes by participants. Most participants reported that program content was of clinical relevance and would improve their patients' outcomes (90.5% [571/631] and 90.6% [572/631], respectively). Over three-quarters (77.8%, 495/636) of participants reported areas of their practice that can be improved by additional education specifically regarding workflow, diagnosis, and management. This study evaluates one of the first national initiatives for primary care education. Data from the two First Contact Family Medicine national symposia indicate the program is generally well received with most participants reporting improved confidence and intention to implement key changes in practice to improve care for patients with headache; however, there remain areas of exploration for education that could further enhance participant experience and expand the reach of the initiatives. Areas for future programming include continued education on multifactorial approaches to headache treatment and suggestions for addressing cost, insurance, and time constraints. Also, future work may examine where the First Contact program might focus initiatives based on specific areas of need in headache care, such as geographic "desert" areas, racial and ethnic disparities, and uninsured/underinsured populations.

The Effect of Ambient Artificial Intelligence Notes on Provider Burnout.

Healthcare provider burnout is a critical issue with significant implications for individual well-being, patient care, and healthcare system efficiency. Addressing burnout is essential for improving both provider well-being and the quality of patient care. Ambient artificial intelligence (AI) offers a novel approach to mitigating burnout by reducing the documentation burden through advanced speech recognition and natural language processing technologies that summarize the patient encounter into a clinical note to be reviewed by clinicians. To assess provider burnout and professional fulfilment associated with Ambient AI technology during a pilot study, assessed using the Stanford Professional Fulfillment Index (PFI). A pre-post observational study was conducted at University of Iowa Health Care with 38 volunteer physicians and advanced practice providers. Participants used a commercial ambient AI tool, over a 5-week trial in ambulatory environments. The AI tool transcribed patient-clinician conversations and generated preliminary clinical notes for review and entry into the electronic medical record. Burnout and professional fulfillment were assessed using the Stanford PFI at baseline and post-intervention. Pre-test and post-test surveys were completed by 35/38 participants (92% survey completion rate). Results showed a significant reduction in burnout scores, with the median burnout score improving from 4.16 to 3.16 (p=0.005), with validated Stanford PFI cutoff for overall burnout 3.33. Burnout rates decreased from 69% to 43%. There was a notable improvement in interpersonal disengagement scores (3.6 vs. 2.5, p<0.001), although work exhaustion scores did not significantly change. Professional fulfillment showed a modest, non-significant upward trend (6.1 vs. 6.5, p=0.10). Ambient AI significantly reduces healthcare provider burnout and may enhance professional fulfillment. By alleviating documentation burdens, ambient AI can improve operational efficiency and provider well-being. These findings suggest that broader implementation of ambient AI could be a strategic intervention to combat burnout in healthcare settings.

Sharing Genomic Tumor Sequencing Results With Patients: Experiences of Advanced Practice Oncology Providers

Background: Patients with cancer routinely undergo genomic tumor sequencing, a component of molecular profiling (MP), to better characterize their cancer and identify potential targetable alterations. Targeted treatments potentially confer higher response rates and better efficacy. With increasing complexity, patients may require detailed explanations of MP results. Patient understanding of MP results increases the likelihood that eligible patients receive targeted treatment. Advanced practice providers (APPs), defined as nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and pharmacists, frequently review and discuss MP results with patients. Purpose: The aim of this study is to understand APP experiences discussing MP results with adult cancer patients. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted through virtual semi-structured interviews with APPs recruited via study invitation shared through the Advanced Practitioner Society for Hematology and Oncology (APSHO). Eligibility criteria included APPs with &gt; 1 year of oncology experience and involvement in discussing MP results. Data were analyzed utilizing a constant comparative analysis and coded in three stages: open, axial, and selective. Results: Thirteen participants were enrolled from across the United States. Participants discussed learning to understand and explain MP findings primarily through on-the-job experiences. Barriers to patient education were also described. Initially coded participant statements (open codes) produced six themes (axial codes). Conclusions: With MP now standard practice in oncology, APPs frequently discuss these results with patients. This study highlights that additional and continuing education related to MP is needed in communicating complex results. Patient educational tools, specific to patients’ MP findings and tailored to their preferences and literacy levels, are critically needed.

Creating a Model for Advanced Practice Provider Mentorship.

Advanced practice providers (APPs), widely considered essential to the delivery of healthcare, are one of the fastest-growing workforces in the United States. However, the APP role is evolving, and professional growth and advancement programs for APPs are still emerging at many institutions. Professional mentorship has been long embraced by other healthcare disciplines and numerous organizations because of the benefits gained from helping employees increase knowledge, enhance skills, and achieve scholarly goals, such as retention. Thus, there is a dearth of evidence on building effective APP mentorship models. This article details the development of an APP mentorship model and program designed to support both the mentor and mentee across the career trajectory.

Medication optimization clinic decreases hospitalizations and mortality for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Study objectiveTo evaluate the impact of a medication optimization clinic (MOC) on GDMT and outcomes for patients with HFrEF versus usual care. DesignRetrospective evaluation of a multi-site MOC was conducted. SettingLarge health system with academic and community hospitals. ParticipantsPatients with HFrEF referred to MOC by their cardiologist versus usual care. InterventionsGDMT use managed by an advanced practice provider or clinical pharmacist through weekly telemedicine visits. Main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was HF hospitalization. Cardiovascular hospitalization and all-cause mortality were also assessed. Kaplan−Meier Curve, Cumulative Incidence Function, and competing risk analysis with regression models were conducted. Results1419 patients in MOC group were compared to 5116 control patients. GDMT use was significantly higher in MOC: quadruple therapy (49 % vs. 19 %; p < 0.0001), angiotensin-receptor neprilysin inhibitor (62 % vs. 45 %; p < 0.0001), beta blocker (92 % vs. 88 %; p < 0.0001), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (69 % vs. 45 %; p < 0.0001), and sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (68 % vs. 35 %; p < 0.0001). Competing risk analyses showed that HF and CV hospitalizations were significantly lower at all times points (3, 6, and 12 months) for MOC vs. control (p < 0.001). All-cause mortality was significantly lower at 6 months (p = 0.006) and 12 months (p < 0.001), but did not differ at 3 months (p = 0.35), for MOC vs. control. ConclusionsMOC was associated with improved GDMT and lower risks of hospitalizations due to HF and any cardiovascular cause, and all-cause mortality in patients with HFrEF.

Comparing Provider and ChatGPT Responses to Breast Reconstruction Patient Questions in the Electronic Health Record.

Patient-directed Electronic Health Record (EHR) messaging is used as an adjunct to enhance patient-physician interactions but further burdens the physician. There is a need for clear electronic patient communication in all aspects of medicine, including plastic surgery. We can potentially utilize innovative communication tools like ChatGPT. This study assesses ChatGPT's effectiveness in answering breast reconstruction queries, comparing its accuracy, empathy, and readability with healthcare providers' responses. Ten deidentified questions regarding breast reconstruction were extracted from electronic messages. They were presented to ChatGPT3, ChatGPT4, plastic surgeons, and advanced practice providers for response. ChatGPT3 and ChatGPT4 were also prompted to give brief responses. Using 1-5 Likert scoring, accuracy and empathy were graded by 2 plastic surgeons and medical students, respectively. Readability was measured using Flesch Reading Ease. Grades were compared using 2-tailed t tests. Combined provider responses had better Flesch Reading Ease scores compared to all combined chatbot responses (53.3 ± 13.3 vs 36.0 ± 11.6, P < 0.001) and combined brief chatbot responses (53.3 ± 13.3 vs 34.7 ± 12.8, P < 0.001). Empathy scores were higher in all combined chatbot than in those from combined providers (2.9 ± 0.8 vs 2.0 ± 0.9, P < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in accuracy between combined providers and all combined chatbot responses (4.3 ± 0.9 vs 4.5 ± 0.6, P = 0.170) or combined brief chatbot responses (4.3 ± 0.9 vs 4.6 ± 0.6, P = 0.128). Amid the time constraints and complexities of plastic surgery decision making, our study underscores ChatGPT's potential to enhance patient communication. ChatGPT excels in empathy and accuracy, yet its readability presents limitations that should be addressed.

2024 ACLP Recommendations for Training Residents in Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry

Despite rapid shifts in consultation-liaison psychiatry (CLP) training in residency, including increasing general residency training requirements from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, greater utilization of advanced practice providers, and effects of the coronavirus-2019 pandemic, the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry (ACLP) has not updated recommendations for residency training in CLP since 2014. A national survey of residency program directors in 2021 suggested many changes to the structure of CLP rotations at individual programs over the past decade. We convened a workgroup of 8 ACLP members holding leadership positions in residency and fellowship education on local and national levels. The project was approved by the ACLP Executive Council and conducted via a three-stage iterative process. Consensus was reached on 34 recommendations across four domains, including structural issues, faculty supervsion, formal curriculum and evaluations, and elective experiences. Residents must spend sufficient time on CLP rotations to achieve relevant milestones. Given that consultants are expected to offer unique insight, the ideal placement of core CLP rotations comes at a time in residency where residents are able to provide expert opinion and lead teams. Faculty expertise in CLP and availability to provide direct supervision and oversight to trainees is essential. A separate and formal CLP didactic curriculum should exist, and elective opportunities should be offered to supplement training. These recommendations are intended to guide residency program directors towards optimizing CLP training for all residents, including those who will eventually pursue CLP fellowship. Establishing a strong CLP foundation for all residents is essential for ensuring competency in providing psychiatric care for medically complex patients and collaborating with our colleagues in other specialties, as well as fostering trainee interest in pursuing a career in CLP.

PP184 Topic: AS16–Medical, Nursing and AHP Workforce &amp; Education: Staff Education and Development/Equity, Diversity, Inclusion/Other: INTEGRATING ADVANCED PRACTICE PROVIDERS INTO PEDIATRIC INTENSIVE CARE UNITS: CONTRASTING APPROACHES FROM FOUR UNITED STATES-BASED PEDIATRIC HOSPITALS

PP184 Topic: AS16–Medical, Nursing and AHP Workforce &amp; Education: Staff Education and Development/Equity, Diversity, Inclusion/Other: INTEGRATING ADVANCED PRACTICE PROVIDERS INTO PEDIATRIC INTENSIVE CARE UNITS: CONTRASTING APPROACHES FROM FOUR UNITED STATES-BASED PEDIATRIC HOSPITALS

Measures of Success: Making the Case for Advanced Practice-Sensitive Quality Indicators.

Description Advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) are key health care providers in a variety of settings. Often APRNs are grouped in a collective category, along with physician assistants, and referred to collectively as advanced practice providers. As APRNs assume an increasing role in patient care management in hospital, outpatient, and community settings, such as clinics and rural practices, measuring the impact of their care on patient outcomes and quality of care becomes a necessary component of performance evaluation. APRN-sensitive outcome indicators are an important way to identify the impact of the role. While a number of studies have been conducted that demonstrate APRN outcomes, identifying specific APRN-sensitive outcome indicators can be challenging. This article reviews the use of APRN-sensitive outcome indicators to identify the impact of the APRN role, highlighting exemplars from several clinical practice sites.

"Who You Are and Where You Live Matters": Hospice Care in New York City During COVID-19 Perspectives on Hospice and Social Determinants: A Rapid Qualitative Analysis.

Context: Social determinants of health (SDOH) impacted the quality of home hospice care provided during the COVID-19 pandemic. Perspectives from professionals who provided care identify challenges and lessons learned from their experience. Objective: To examine hospice professionals' perspectives of how SDOH affected the delivery of high-quality home hospice care in New York City (NYC) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We conducted semistructured interviews with 30 hospice professionals who delivered care to home hospice patients during the COVID-19 pandemic in NYC using a qualitative descriptive design. Purposive sampling was used to recruit professionals from a range of disciplines including physicians, advanced practice providers, nurses, social workers, chaplains, and hospice administration and management. Participants worked for one of two large NYC metro hospices and one outpatient palliative care practice serving the five boroughs of NYC and the surrounding suburbs. Rapid qualitative analysis was used to identify themes. Results: Thirty hospice professionals were interviewed, spanning a variety of clinical and administrative roles. Most (21 out of 30) reported that social determinants affected access and/or delivery of equitable hospice care. Two key themes emerged from interviews: (1) SDOH exist and affect the delivery of high-quality care and (2) disparities were exacerbated during the COVID-19 pandemic resulting in barriers to care. Subthemes outline barriers described by hospice professionals: decreased hospice enrollment, telehealth challenges, resulting in deficient patient/family education, shortages of nursing assistants in some neighborhoods, and diminished overall quality of hospice care for some patients. SDOH created barriers to hospice care through neighborhood factors, resource barriers, and system challenges. Conclusion: SDOH provide a context to understand disparity in the provision of hospice care. COVID-19 exacerbated these conditions. Addressing multidimensional barriers created by SDOH is key in creating high-quality and equitable hospice care, particularly during a crisis.

Future Considerations and Areas for Innovation for Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Patients.

Pulmonary rehabilitation is an effective therapy that improves day-to-day symptoms and quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In this review, we look at the role of virtual programs, implementation of artificial intelligence, emerging areas of improvement within the educational components of programs, and the benefit of advanced practice providers in directorship roles.

A Case for Specific Education of Advanced Practice Providers in Allergy &amp; Immunology: Results of a Gap Analysis and Targeted Needs Assessment

Introduction Advanced practice providers (APPs) are increasingly utilized throughout the health care system. At present there is no nationally sanctioned curriculum for APPs providing Allergy &amp; Immunology (A&amp;I) care. Methods A nationwide gap analysis and targeted needs assessment was conducted to examine the current level of education/training of APPs in A&amp;I. Results At present, training in A&amp;I in NP/PA school is quite limited. The formal education and clinical training APPs receive at practice sites varies significantly with most APPs feeling only somewhat comfortable providing A&amp;I care upon completion of their training period. Conclusions Results of a nationwide gap analysis and targeted needs assessment identify the need for providing education specific for A&amp;I to APPs practicing in this field.

Development and Implementation of a Family Presence Facilitator Curriculum for Interprofessional Use in Pediatric Medical Resuscitations.

Family presence during pediatric medical resuscitation has myriad benefits. However, there is significant heterogeneity in provider acceptance and implementation of the family support role. We designed this curriculum to teach all members of the health care team best practices in the Family Presence Facilitator (FPF) role during pediatric medical resuscitations. We applied Kern's six-step approach to develop an FPF curriculum comprising didactic and interactive elements, along with training for simulated participants. We implemented the curriculum through (a) live sessions (30-minute didactic or 90-minute workshop) for learners; (b) a 20-minute asynchronous version of the didactic curriculum for self-directed learning; and (c) a 1-hour, monthly, in situ simulation curriculum in a pediatric emergency department setting. Curriculum evaluation surveys queried self-reported engagement, satisfaction, relevance, confidence, commitment, knowledge, skills, and attitudes in a retrospective pre/post format. We collected data from 153 learners, including attendings, fellows, residents, advanced practice providers, medical students, and child life specialists, between October 2022 and September 2023. Only 22% of participants had received similar prior training. One hundred percent of learners found the curriculum enjoyable and engaging; learners also agreed the curriculum improved their knowledge and skills in providing empathetic and respectful communication (99%); nonspeculative, clear information (100%); and nonverbal support (99%). Of respondents, 100% believed the curriculum would improve the patient care experience. Facilitating family presence during pediatric medical resuscitations is a crucial skill. Our curriculum improves self-reported confidence, knowledge, and skills among interprofessional learners. Next steps include expanding this curriculum beyond the pediatric setting.