Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors Research Articles

Performance of surufatinib in treating advanced neuroendocrine neoplasms: Insights from a real-world study.

e15124 Background: Current comparisons of targeted treatments for advanced neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs)-specifically surufatinib, sunitinib, and everolimus—are lacking. This study aims to assess their efficacy and safety in a real-world setting. Methods: A retrospective, observational study was conducted at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, including patients with advanced NENs prescribed surufatinib, sunitinib or everolimus between July 2020 and April 2023. The primary outcome was median progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and adverse events (AE). Results: A total of 123, 56 and 68 locally advanced or metastatic NEN patients treated with surufatinib, sunitinib or everolimus were enrolled. In pancreatic NENs (pNEN), surufatinib demonstrated superior efficacy over sunitinib and everolimus combined (mPFS: 8.67 vs 6.37 months, P=0.02; ORR: 17.1% vs 8.3%). Specifically, surufatinib outperformed sunitinib (mPFS: 8.67 vs 6.40 months, P=0.04; ORR: 17.1% vs 10.9%) and everolimus (mPFS: 8.67 vs 5.37 months, P=0.05; ORR: 17.1% vs 3.8%) individually. In extrapancreatic NENs (epNEN), surufatinib showed enhanced efficacy compared to everolimus (mPFS: 9.47 vs 6.70 months, P=0.15; ORR: 8.3% vs 5.3%). On multivariate Cox analysis, male, functional status, Ki67 index>20%, previous SSA and germline mutation, poor differentiation, liver metastasis, multi treatment lines were identified as negative effect (P<0.05) for PFS in pNEN and epNEN patients respectively. The most common adverse events (AEs) were hypertension (12.2%) in surufatinib-treated patients, manageable with medication. Sunitinib led to decreased neutrophil counts (10.7%), and everolimus was associated with anemia (4.4%). Conclusions: Utilizing real-world data, this study reveals surufatinib significantly enhances progression-free survival (PFS) over sunitinib and everolimus in advanced neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), guiding future targeted treatment choices.

Opposing effects of cannabidiol in patient-derived neuroendocrine tumor, pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma primary cultures.

Treatment options for advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (together PPGLs) are still limited. In recent years, anti-tumor effects of cannabinoids have been reported; however, there are only very limited data available in NETs or PPGLs. Investigation of the effects of cannabidiol (CBD) on patient-derived human NET/PPGL primary cultures and on NET/PPGL cell lines. We established primary cultures derived from 46 different patients with PPGLs (n = 35) or NETs (n = 11) who underwent tumor resection at two centers. Treatment of patient primary cultures with clinically relevant doses (5 µM) and slightly higher doses (10 µM) of CBD was performed. We found opposing effects of 5 µM CBD: significant anti-tumor effects in 5/35 (14%) and significant tumor-promoting effects in 6/35 (17%) of PPGL primary cultures. In terms of anti-tumor effects, cluster 2-related PPGLs showed significantly stronger responsivity to CBD compared to cluster 1-related PPGLs (p = 0.042). Of the cluster 2-related tumors, NF1 PPGLs showed strongest responsivity (4/5 PPGL primary cultures with a significant decrease in cell viability were NF1-mutated). We also found opposing effects of 10 µM CBD in PPGLs and NETs: significant anti-tumor effects in 9/33 of PPGL (27%) and 3/11 of NET (27%) primary cultures, significant tumor-promoting effects in 6/33 of PPGL (18%) and 2/11 of NET (18%) primary cultures. We suggest a potential novel treatment option for some NETs/PPGLs, but also provide evidence for caution when applying cannabinoids as supportive therapy for pain or appetite management to cancer patients, and possibly as health supplements.

Advances in Radionuclide Therapies for Patients with Neuro-endocrine Tumors.

To provide insights into the role of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NET) and an overview of possible strategies to combine PRRT with locoregional and systemic anticancer treatments. Research on combining PRRT with other treatments encompasses a wide variety or treatments, both local (transarterial radioembolization) and systemic therapies, chemotherapy (i.e., capecitabine and temozolomide), targeted therapies (i.e., olaparib, everolimus, and sunitinib), and immunotherapies (e.g., nivolumab and pembrolizumab). Furthermore, PRRT shows promising first results as a treatment prior to surgery. There is great demand to enhance the efficacy of PRRT through combination with other anticancer treatments. While research in this area is currently limited, the field is rapidly evolving with numerous ongoing clinical trials aiming to address this need and explore novel therapeutic combinations.

Surgery for advanced neuroendocrine tumours of the small bowel: recommendations based on a consensus meeting of the European Society of Endocrine Surgeons (ESES).

Small bowel neuroendocrine tumours often present with locally advanced or metastatic disease. The aim of this paper is to provide evidence-based recommendations regarding (controversial) topics in the surgical management of advanced small bowel neuroendocrine tumours. A working group of experts was formed by the European Society of Endocrine Surgeons. The group addressed 11 clinically relevant questions regarding surgery for advanced disease, including the benefit of primary tumour resection, the role of cytoreduction, the extent of lymph node clearance, and the management of an unknown primary tumour. A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE to identify papers addressing the research questions. Final recommendations were presented and voted upon by European Society of Endocrine Surgeons members at the European Society of Endocrine Surgeons Conference in Mainz in 2023. The literature review yielded 1223 papers, of which 84 were included. There were no randomized controlled trials to address any of the research questions and therefore conclusions were based on the available case series, cohort studies, and systematic reviews/meta-analyses of the available non-randomized studies. The proposed recommendations were scored by 38-51 members and rated 'strongly agree' or 'agree' by 64-96% of participants. This paper provides recommendations based on the best available evidence and expert opinion on the surgical management of locally advanced and metastatic small bowel neuroendocrine tumours.

Assessing the effectiveness and safety of surufatinib versus everolimus or sunitinib in advanced neuroendocrine neoplasms: insights from a real-world, retrospective cohort study using propensity score and inverse probability treatment weighting analysis.

While surufatinib, sunitinib, and everolimus have shown efficacy for advanced neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), direct comparisons in a real-world setting remain unexplored. This gap highlights the clinical need to understand their comparative effectiveness and safety within the diverse Chinese population. Addressing this, our study provides insights into the real-world performance of these therapies, aiming to inform treatment selection and improve patient outcomes. A retrospective, observational study was conducted at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, including patients with advanced NENs treated with surufatinib, sunitinib, or everolimus between July 2020 and April 2023. Eligibility criteria focused on histologically confirmed, locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic NENs, with patients having received at least one month of targeted therapy. We employed inverse probability weighting (IPW) with the propensity score (PS) matching to adjust for the bias of baseline characteristics. The assessment of covariates included age, sex, performance status, primary tumor site, functional status, genetic mutations, tumor differentiation, Ki67 index, tumor grade, metastasis site, and previous therapies. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs). The study enrolled 123, 56, and 68 locally advanced or metastatic NEN patients treated with surufatinib, sunitinib, and everolimus, respectively. Before adjusting for confounding factors, surufatinib was used less frequently as a first-line treatment compared to sunitinib and everolimus in pancreatic NENs (pNENs) (11.1% vs. 22.1%, P=0.057). Significant differences were noted in prior treatments and tumor characteristics between surufatinib and everolimus groups in extrapancreatic NENs (epNENs) (P<0.05). Post-IPW, these disparities were resolved (P>0.05). Surufatinib demonstrated superior median PFS (mPFS) in both pancreatic [8.30 vs. 6.33 months, hazard ratio (HR) 0.592, P<0.001] and epNENs (8.73 vs. 3.70 months, HR 0.608, P<0.001) compared to everolimus or sunitinib. Notably, male gender (HR 1.75, P=0.001), functional status (HR 2.09, P=0.01), Ki67 index >20% (HR 12.7, P=0.004), previous somatostatin analogue (SSA) treatment (HR 1.73, P=0.001), germline mutation (HR 5.62, P<0.001), poor differentiation (HR 7.45, P<0.001), liver metastasis (HR 1.72, P=0.001) and multiple treatment lines (HR 1.62 for 2nd line, P=0.04; HR 1.88 for ≥3rd line, P=0.01) were identified as negative prognostic factors for PFS. Conversely, dose adjustment (HR 0.63, P=0.009) and treatment with surufatinib (HR 0.58 for pNEN, P<0.001; HR 0.62 for epNEN, P=0.002) were correlated with longer PFS. In a real-world Chinese cohort, surufatinib significantly outperformed sunitinib and everolimus in prolonging PFS among advanced NEN patients, with identifiable clinical features impacting survival, and conclusions regarding superiority should be interpreted with caution due to the retrospective design. Our findings underscore the need for prospective studies to further validate these results and explore additional predictive biomarkers for personalized treatment strategies.

Dosimetry and pharmacokinetics of [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan in patients with progressive neuroendocrine tumours.

To evaluate the dosimetry and pharmacokinetics of the novel radiolabelled somatostatin receptor antagonist [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). This study was part of a phase I/II trial of [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan, administered at a median cumulative activity of 13.0 GBq over three planned cycles (median activity/cycle: 4.5 GBq), in 40 patients with progressive NETs. Organ absorbed doses were monitored at each cycle using patient-specific dosimetry; the cumulative absorbed-dose limits were set at 23.0Gy for the kidneys and 1.5Gy for bone marrow. Absorbed dose coefficients (ADCs) were calculated using both patient-specific and model-based dosimetry for some patients. In all evaluated organs, maximum [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan uptake was observed at the first imaging timepoint (4h after injection), followed by an exponential decrease. Kidneys were the main route of elimination, with a cumulative excretion of 57-66% within 48h following the first treatment cycle. At the first treatment cycle, [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan showed a median terminal blood half-life of 127h and median ADCs of [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan were 5.0Gy/GBq in tumours, 0.1Gy/GBq in the bone marrow, 0.9Gy/GBq in kidneys, 0.2Gy/GBq in the liver and 0.8Gy/GBq in the spleen. Using image-based dosimetry, the bone marrow and kidneys received median cumulative absorbed doses of 1.1 and 10.8Gy, respectively, after three cycles. [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan showed a favourable dosimetry profile, with high and prolonged tumour uptake, supporting its acceptable safety profile and promising efficacy. NCT02592707. Registered October 30, 2015.

Abstract 3585: DNA-PK inhibition to enhance radiation sensitivity in metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine cancer

Abstract Gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are neoplasms originating from the gastrointestinal track and pancreas. Unfortunately, most patients at the time of diagnosis have extensive metastatic disease and are not candidates for curative surgical resection of metastatic tumors. In such cases, targeted radiation therapy (RT) can slow the progression of metastatic disease, but eventually tumors develop resistance to radiation therapy. In this study, we examined whether DNA-PK inhibition could sensitize pancreatic NETs to radiation therapy and enhance the radiation therapy effect in a preclinical model of pNET metastasis. Methods. We used 96-well clonogenic assays to evaluate the efficacy of the DNA-PK inhibitor peposertib in combination with RT in vitro in QGP-1 and BON pancreatic NET cell lines. Double-strand break-induced DNA repair was visualized with confocal laser scanning microscopy using γ-H2AX immunofluorescence after peposertib treatment alone or in combination with RT. Western blot analysis was used to confirm inhibition of DNA-PKcs (pDNA-PKcs S2056) combination RT. The efficacy of peposertib in combination with RT was evaluated in QGP-1 and BON human xenograft models in athymic nude mice and a BON preclinical lung metastasis model. Results. Clonogenic assays demonstrated absence of cytotoxicity from peposertib alone at doses below 1000 nM and a strong radiosensitizing effect at 200 nM in both QGP-1 and BON cell lines. Pretreatment with peposertib or treatment within 2 h after RT suppressed colony formation; treatment at later timepoints did not enhance radiotherapy. Immunofluorescence analysis revealed high numbers of γH2AX foci with peposertib therapy alone at 96 h or when given 2 h after RT. Western blot analysis confirmed inhibition of DNA-PK Ser2056 after RT in combination with peposertib. DNA-PK inhibition in combination with RT led to remarkable repression of pNET growth both in subcutaneous xenografts (&amp;gt;90%) and in the preclinical lung metastasis model (&amp;gt;90%). Conclusions. Our results showed several advantages of targeting DNA-PK to enhance radiation sensitivity in high-grade pNETs: (1) DNA-PK inhibition alone disrupts DNA damage response in pNETs as demonstrated by strong H2AX phosphorylation. (2) DNA-PK inhibition is most effective at enhancing radiotherapy either right before or after radiation therapy administration. This demonstrates that extended DNA-PK inhibition is not necessary to achieve marked responses during pNET radiotherapy. (3) DNA-PK inhibition 30 min before radiation therapy is sufficient to greatly reduce pNET tumor growth or metastasis progression in pNET preclinical models. In summary, selective DNA-PK inhibition provides a potent therapeutic strategy for disruption of non-homologous end joining DNA double-strand break repair and may offer a novel therapeutic approach in advanced NET radiotherapy. Citation Format: Piotr G. Rychahou, Aman Chauhan, Zeta Chow, Tadahide Izumi, Quan Chen, Eun Y. Lee, Dana Napier, Lowell Brian Anthony, Michael J. Cavnar, Courtney M. Townsend, B. Mark Evers. DNA-PK inhibition to enhance radiation sensitivity in metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 3585.

Effectiveness and Safety of Retreatment with 177Lu-DOTATATE in Patients with Progressive Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Retrospective Real-World Study in the United States.

Advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are associated with a poor prognosis. A regimen of 4 cycles of 177Lu-DOTATATE has been shown to improve both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced NETs. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study in the United States to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of additional cycles of 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy in patients with progressive NETs. Methods: This was a retrospective chart review of adults with advanced NETs. The patients had undergone initial treatment with up to 4 cycles of 177Lu-DOTATATE and, after disease progression and a period of at least 6 mo since the end of the initial treatment, were retreated with at least 1 additional cycle at a single center (2010-2020). Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes were evaluated descriptively. Response was evaluated according to RECIST 1.1; toxicity was defined using criteria from Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Kaplan-Meier plots were used to evaluate PFS and OS. Results: Of the 31 patients who received 177Lu-DOTATATE retreatment, 61% were male and 94% were White. Overall, patients received a median of 6 cycles (4 initial cycles and 2 retreatment cycles), and the mean administered activity was 41.9 GBq. Two patients also went on to receive additional retreatment (1 and 2 cycles, individually) after a second period of at least 6 mo and progression after retreatment. Best responses of partial response and stable disease were observed in 35% and 65% of patients after the initial treatment and 23% and 45% of patients after retreatment, respectively. The median PFS after the initial treatment was 20.2 mo and after retreatment was 9.6 mo. The median OS after the initial treatment was 42.6 mo and after retreatment was 12.6 mo. Hematologic parameters decreased significantly during both the initial treatment and retreatment but recovered such that there was little difference between the values before the initial treatment and before the retreatment. Clinically significant hematotoxicity occurred in 1 and 3 patients after the initial treatment and retreatment, respectively. No grade 3 or 4 nephrotoxicity was observed. Conclusion: Retreatment with 177Lu-DOTATATE after progression appeared to be well tolerated and offered disease control in patients with progressive NETs after initial 177Lu-DOTATATE treatment.

Patient Priorities Concerning Treatment Decisions for Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors Identified by Discrete Choice Experiments.

Patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) have multiple treatment options. Ideally, treatment decisions are shared between physician and patient; however, previous studies suggest that oncologists and patients place different value on treatment attributes such as adverse event (AE) rates. High-quality information on NET patient treatment preferences may facilitate patient-centered decision making by helping clinicians understand patient priorities. This study used 2 discrete choice experiments (DCE) to elicit preferences of NET patients regarding advanced midgut and pancreatic NET (pNET) treatments. The DCEs used the "potentially all pairwise rankings of all possible alternatives" (PAPRIKA) method. The primary objective was to determine relative utility rankings for treatment attributes, including progression-free survival (PFS), treatment modality, and AE rates. Ranking of attribute profiles matching specific treatments was also determined. Levels for treatment attributes were obtained from randomized clinical trial data of NET treatments. One hundred and 10 participants completed the midgut NET DCE, and 132 completed the pNET DCE. Longer PFS was the highest ranked treatment attribute in 64.5% of participants in the midgut NET DCE, and in 59% in the pNET DCE. Approximately, 40% of participants in both scenarios prioritized lower AE rates or less invasive treatment modalities over PFS. Ranking of treatment profiles in the midgut NET scenario identified 60.9% of participants favoring peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), and 30.0% somatostatin analogue dose escalation. NET patients have heterogeneous priorities when choosing between treatment options based on the results of 2 independent DCEs. These results highlight the importance of shared decision making for NET patients.

Real-Life Use of [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in Confirmed and Suspected NETs from a Prospective 5-Year Electronic Archive at an ENETS Center of Excellence: More Than 2000 Scans in More Than 1500 Patients.

The recent introduction of novel treatments for advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and the well-established impact of clinical case discussion within dedicated multidisciplinary teams indicates the need to promote the centralization of rare diseases, such as NENs (neuroendocrine neoplasms). Data on the real-life use of and indications for [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT were collected from a prospective monocentric 5-year electronic archive including consecutive patients with confirmed and suspected NETs (September 2017 to May 2022). Overall, 2082 [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT scans (1685 confirmed NETs, 397 suspected NETs) were performed in 1537 patients. A high positivity rate was observed across different clinical settings (approximately 70%). Approximately 910/2082 scans were requested by the local oncology ward (851 confirmed NETs, 59 suspected NETs). The following observations were found: (i) the detection rate across all indications was 73.2% (higher for staging, peptide receptor radioligand therapy (PRRT) selection, and treatment response assessment); (ii) in suspected NETs, PET was more often positive when based on radiological findings. This systematic data collection in a high-volume diagnostic center represents a reliable cohort reflecting the global trends in the use of [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT for different clinical indications and primary tumor sites, but prompts the need for further multicenter data sharing in such a rare and slowly progressive disease setting.

Prediction of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE therapy response using the absorbed dose estimated from [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE SPECT/CT in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumour.

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE has shown efficacy in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). Personalised dosimetry is crucial to optimise treatment outcomes and minimise adverse events. In this study, we investigated the correlation between the tumour-absorbed dose (TAD) estimated from [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE SPECT/CT and the therapeutic response. A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with advanced well-differentiated NETs grades 1-3 who underwent PRRT and exhibited greater uptake than liver on pre-therapeutic [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT. Target lesions were selected based on the RECIST 1.1 and PERCIST 1.0 criteria using [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE SPECT/CT and pre-therapeutic contrast-enhanced CT scans. For anatomical image analysis, the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of the target lesions was measured using the RECIST 1.1 criteria for patient-based analysis and the longest diameter (LD) of the target lesion using the RECIST-L criteria for lesion-based analysis. Standardised uptake values (SUVs) were measured on SPECT/CT images, and TADs were calculated based on the SUVs. Dosimetry was performed using a single SPECT/CT imaging time point at day 4-5 post-therapy. Statistical analyses were conducted to investigate correlations and determine the target lesion responses. Twenty patients with primary tumour sites and hepatic metastases were included. Fifty-five target lesions, predominantly located in the pancreas and liver, were analysed. The cumulative TAD (lesion-based analysis: r = 0.299-0.301, p = 0.025-0.027), but not the cycle 1 SUV (lesion-based analysis: r = 0.198-0.206, p = 0.131-0.147) or cycle 1 TAD (lesion-based analysis: r = 0.209-0.217, p = 0.112-0.126), exhibited a significant correlation with the change in LD of the target lesion. Binary logistic regression analysis identified the significance of the cumulative TAD in predicting disease control according to the RECIST-L criteria (odds ratio = 1.031-1.051, p = 0.024-0.026). The cumulative TAD estimated from [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE SPECT/CT revealed a significant correlation with change in LD, which was significantly higher for the cumulative TAD than for the cycle 1 SUV or TAD. A higher cumulative TAD was associated with disease control in the target lesion. However, considering the limitations inherent to a confined sample size, careful interpretation of these findings is required. Estimation of the cumulative TAD of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE therapy could guide the platform towards personalised therapy.

Assessment of hematological toxicity in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors and extensive/innumerable bone metastases undergoing lutetium-177 DOTATATE treatment.

592 Background: The introduction of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) using Lutetium-177 (177Lu) DOTATATE has led to a paradigm shift in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Hematological toxicity is a well-recognized adverse effect (AE) of 177Lu DOTATATE. Most cytopenias are transient, with an estimated incidence of 10-25%, typically mild to moderate in severity (grade G1-2). The most dreaded AE of PRRT is therapy-related myeloid neoplasm (t-MN), with an estimated 2-8% incidence and a higher incidence reported in patients who also received prior chemotherapy. We sought to evaluate the hematological safety of 177Lu PRRT in the setting of NETs with extensive (i.e., innumerable) bone metastases. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all Mayo Clinic patients (pts) with extensive/innumerable osseous metastases, defined as &gt;50% skeletal involvement by positron emission tomography (PET) DOTATATE, who were treated with 177Lu DOTATATE. Pts characteristics and laboratory results were collected before, during, and after 177Lu DOTATATE treatment. Hematotoxicity was graded according to the NCI-CTCAE v5. Results: Out of 27 pts, 13(48%) developed cytopenia(s) of any grade after treatment with one or more cycles of 177Lu DOTATATE. In total, there were 13(48%) pts with anemia, 13(48%) with thrombocytopenia, and 6(22%) with neutropenia. Six (22%) pts had severe hematological toxicity (G3-4). Twelve months post-PRRT, 7(26%) pts continued to experience cytopenia(s) of any grade, of whom 4(15%) had G3-4 hematotoxicity. One pt developed t-MN, and two pts had myelophthisis on bone marrow biopsy from infiltrating NET. 16(59%) pts received cytotoxic chemotherapy before PRRT, and 7(25.9%) developed subsequent cytopenia(s). Overall, 15(55%) pts completed four cycles, while 3 pts didn’t complete four cycles of 177Lu DOTATATE due to hematotoxicity. Conclusions: Pts with advanced NETs and extensive/innumerable bone metastases treated with PRRT could be at higher risk for myelosuppression than historical controls. Our study highlights the importance of carefully monitoring and assessing hematological parameters in pts being considered for 177Lu DOTATATE with extensive/innumerable bone metastasis. [Table: see text]

Immunotherapy for endocrine tumours: a clinician's perspective.

Immunotherapy has revolutionised the treatment of oncological patients, but its application in various endocrine tumours is rather limited and is mainly used when conventional therapies have failed. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been employed in progressive adrenocortical carcinoma, primarily utilizing the anti-PD-L1 agent pembrolizumab, obtaining overall response rates ranging between 14% and 23%. In contrast, the response rate in phaeochromocytoma/paraganglioma was substantially less at 9%, considering the small number of patients treated. Similarly, the response rate in advanced differentiated thyroid carcinomas treated with pembrolizumab was also low at 9%, although the combination of ICIs with tyrosine kinase inhibitors showed higher efficacy. Low response rates to ICIs have also been observed in progressive medullary thyroid cancer, except in tumours with a high mutation burden (TMB). Pembrolizumab or spartalizumab can be utilized in patients with high TMB anaplastic thyroid cancer, obtaining better response rates, particularly in patients with high PD-L1 expression. Immunotherapy has also been used in a few cases of parathyroid carcinoma, showing limited antitumour effect. Pituitary carcinomas may exhibit a more favourable response to ICIs compared to aggressive pituitary tumours, particularly corticotroph tumours. Patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumours achieve an overall response rate of 15%, which varies according to the primary tumour site of origin, degree of differentiation, and therapeutic regimen utilised. Future research is needed to evaluate the potential role of immunohistochemical biomarkers, such as programmed death 1/programmed death ligand 1 and TMB, as predictors for the response to immunotherapy. Furthermore, randomised prospective studies could provide more robust data on the efficacy and side effects of ICIs.

Combined Lanreotide Autogel and Temozolomide Treatment of Progressive Pancreatic and Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors: The Phase II SONNET Study.

In advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NET), antiproliferative treatment options beyond somatostatin analogs remain limited. Temozolomide (TMZ) has shown efficacy in NET alone or combined with other drugs. SONNET (NCT02231762) was an open, multicenter, prospective, phase II study to evaluate lanreotide autogel 120 mg (LAN) plus TMZ in patients with progressive advanced/metastatic grade 1/2 gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) NET or of unknown primary. Patients could be enrolled at first-line or higher therapy line. The primary endpoint was disease control rate ([DCR], rate of stable disease [SD], partial [PR], and complete response [CR]) at 6 months of LAN and TMZ. Patients with nonfunctioning (NF) NET without progression at 6 months were randomized to 6-month LAN maintenance or watch and wait, patients with functioning (F)-NET with clinical benefit (PR, SD) continued on LAN. Fifty-seven patients were recruited. The majority of patients received the study drug at second or higher treatment line and had an NET G2. DCR at 6 months LAN and TMZ was 73.5%. After 6 months of further LAN maintenance, 54.5% of patients with F-NET and 71.4% with NF-NET had SD or PR vs 41.7% with NF-NET on observation only. LAN and TMZ were effective in all subgroups analyzed. At 12 months of follow-up, median progression-free survival was 11.1 months. Median serum chromogranin A decreased except in NF-NET on observation. O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation appeared to better reflect TMZ response than loss of gene expression. During combination therapy, the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events grade 3/4 reported were nausea (14%), thrombocytopenia (12.3%), and neutropenia (8.8%). Four deaths were reported resulting from severe adverse events not considered related to study medication. LAN plus TMZ is a treatment option for patients with progressive GEP-NET with more aggressive biological profile showing a manageable safety profile.

Quality of life differs by age and sex for participants with advanced neuroendocrine neoplasms in the eNET study

Quality of life differs by age and sex for participants with advanced neuroendocrine neoplasms in the eNET study

Phase 3 LEVEL trial of 177Lu-edotreotide vs everolimus in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors of lung or thymic origin (GETNE-T2217)

Phase 3 LEVEL trial of 177Lu-edotreotide vs everolimus in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors of lung or thymic origin (GETNE-T2217)

PP492 177Lu-DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors: Asian retrospective analysis

PP492 177Lu-DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors: Asian retrospective analysis

Peptide receptor chemoradionuclide therapy for neuroendocrine neoplasms: A systematic review.

Peptide receptor chemoradionuclide therapy (PRCRT), the addition of radiosensitising chemotherapy to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), has been used in individual centres for neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), but there are few data to date regarding its efficacy and safety. We conducted a systematic review to document the efficacy and side effect profile of this combination. We searched for studies including ≥5 patients with advanced NENs who received PRCRT. Major databases were searched and supplemented by handsearching of major conferences from 2019 to 2023. Data extracted included clinicopathological characteristics, trial setting and doses of chemotherapy and PRRT administered. Endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events (AEs); summarised qualitatively because of the marked heterogeneity in patient populations, trial designs and treatments administered. Eligible studies (24) included: 14 retrospective studies (643 patients) and 10 prospective studies (521 patients). For PRRT, most studies used 177 Lu (n = 21), with combination 177 Lu + 90 Y (n = 2), 111 In (n = 1) and 225 Ac (n = 1). Chemotherapy regimens included capecitabine (n = 8), capecitabine and temozolomide (n = 5), 5-fluorouracil (n = 4) or a mixture of regimens (n = 6). Most studies included Grade 1-2 NENs. In prospective studies, median OS exceeded 2 years in most studies (range not reached by end of follow-up-86 months). In retrospective studies, median OS ranged from 7 months to 55 months and was not reached in many studies. PFS data ranged from 31 months-not reached in prospective cohorts and from 4 months-not reached in retrospective cohorts. Grade 3/4 AEs were commonly haematological, with majority being reversible or having no ongoing clinical impact. For advanced NENs, PRCRT treatment has demonstrated promising clinical outcomes and was well tolerated, although identified studies were heterogeneous. Further randomised trial data are required to clarify the place of this combination modality in the NEN treatment paradigm.

MO69-4 Clinical outcomes of everolimus for patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors arising from the rectum: A single-institutional retrospective study

MO69-4 Clinical outcomes of everolimus for patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors arising from the rectum: A single-institutional retrospective study

Clinical manifestation of neuroendocrine tumor – carcinoid heart disease

Carcinoid heart disease (CHD) is a rare manifestation of the carcinoid syndrome, but eventually occurs in most patients and is a major cause of cardiovascular mortality. The development of CHD is known to be a negative prognostic factor in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors. The mechanism of CHD pathophysiology remains poorly understood. Progress in early diagnosis and improvement of therapeutic approaches over the last decade has reduced hospital mortality in this cohort of patients. In this clinical case we summarize clinical features of the examination, treatment of and demonstrate modern pathogenetic aspects of the development of this condition.